Re: AMD Processor support in compute offering

2024-04-22 Thread Ivan Kudriavtsev
Hi.

Normally, you either sponsor it or develop it. This is how CloudStack
works. Every function in CS was developed and sponsored by some individual
or company. Also, I think that required functionality is already there. At
least Qemu hooks probably enable it.

Пн, 22 апр. 2024 г. в 08:11, Logeswaran T :

> Hi Team,
>
> Since the AMD new release of GPU cards AMD Instinct™ MI300X GPU Data, we
> would like to add the GPU support for these AMD M1300X cards to offer GPU
> related services to our end customers. Any possibilities of this card
> support in the upcoming releases? If possible any ETA is fine for our
> roadmap.
>
> Regards,
> Loges
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> *This E-mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. If you
> are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part
> of
> it. If you have received this message in error, please delete it and all
> copies
> from your system and notify the sender immediately by return E-mail.
> Internet
> communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or
> virus-free.
> The sender does not accept liability for any errors or
> omissions*
>


RE: How to force NFSv4 in ACS

2024-04-22 Thread henrique . sato
Hello, Murilo. 

When NFS primary storage is created on ACS, it is mounted on hosts with
the environment settings, which can be customized via
/etc/nfsmount.conf. Could you add the following lines to this file and
check if it works? 

[ NFSMount_Global_Options ]
vers=4.0
timeo=1800

Best regards, Henrique Sato

AW: Monitoring Cloudstack

2024-04-22 Thread me
Take a look at this:
https://www.shapeblue.com/monitoring-apache-cloudstack-hypervisors/

ShapeBlue published a nice White Paper about it.

Regards,
Swen

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Marty Godsey  
Gesendet: Samstag, 20. April 2024 08:22
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Monitoring Cloudstack

Hello all.

What ways do you guys monitor your Cloudstack servers? SNMP, API, etc?..




RE: RVR's in master/master state

2024-04-22 Thread Gary Dixon
Thanks Wei

That was the article I was following for troubleshooting - proved to be very 
useful.

In our case even though the multicast config was present and correct on the 
switches it has just stopped working after the power outage. Re-applying the 
multicast switch config immediately restored functionality to the RVR's




Gary Dixon
Quadris Cloud Manager
+44 (0) 161 537 4980 +44 (0) 7989 717661
gary.di...@quadris.co.uk
www.quadris.com
Innovation House, 12-13 Bredbury Business Park
Bredbury Park Way, Bredbury, Stockport, SK6 2SN
-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU 
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2024 3:28 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: RVR's in master/master state

Hi Gary,

Thanks for the sharing

I recall a similar issue caused by a multicast configuration (not the
same):
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7838#issuecomment-1722697352

anyone facing the similar issue could check the multicast configurations.


Kind regards,
Wei



On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 6:20 PM Gary Dixon 
wrote:

> Hi Daan
>
> Sorry - I forgot to post back what the issue turned out to be.
>
> We had a power outage in our building where our Dev environment is racked.
> After doing some tcp dumps on some vxlan interfaces I was seeing lots
> of bad checksums.
> Our Network engineer swore that the switches we're all OK but after
> re-applying the multicast config on the switches - all of the RVR's
> came back into a stable Master/Backup state across all VPC's.
> Hope this helps others if they are seeing strange behaviour with VPC
> RVR's when using VXLAN guest isolation
>
> BR
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> Gary Dixon
> Quadris Cloud Manager
> +44 (0) 161 537 4980 <+44%20(0)%20161%20537%204980>
>  +44 (0) 7989 717661 <+44%20(0)%207989%20717661>
> gary.di...@quadris.co.uk
> http://www.q/
> uadris.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7CGary.Dixon%40quadris.co.uk%7Ce9fb36590460
> 4570a19608dc61461dbf%7Cf1d6abf3d3b44894ae16db0fb93a96a2%7C0%7C0%7C6384
> 92200978503803%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2l
> uMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=MOrw1j6mujkBduk
> TaLlsZ%2BhV0ql9qcziL%2FcPnNNIbmk%3D&reserved=0
> Innovation House, 12‑13 Bredbury Business Park Bredbury Park Way,
> Bredbury, Stockport, SK6 2SN -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland 
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 3:08 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RVR's in master/master state
>
> sorry no one could help you Gary,
> Have you gotten any further on this issue?
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 4:59 PM Gary Dixon
>  >
> wrote:
>
> > HI all
> >
> >
> >
> > ACS 4.15.2
> >
> > Ubuntu 20.04
> >
> > KVM
> >
> > Adv Zone no sec groups
> >
> >
> >
> > We recently had to move all of our dev ACS environment virtual
> > management and mysql servers to a new isolated subnet for security
> reasons.
> >
> >
> >
> > Since then all of the VPC RVR’s are in master/master mode.
> >
> > If I restart a VPC with cleanup the RVR’s come back into a
> > master/backup state for a few minutes but then go into master/master
> > state rendering the VPC useless.
> >
> >
> >
> > In the cloud.log on one of the RVR’s it is full of these errors:
> >
> > “2024-04-05 14:51:43,843 ERROR Not able to setup source-nat for a
> > regular router yet”
> >
> >
> >
> > Can anyone point me in the right direction to resolve this issue ?
> >
> > Are there other logs I could look at or services on the RVR’s to check ?
> >
> >
> >
> > BR
> >
> >
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > Gary Dixon
> > Quadris Cloud Manager
> > +44 (0) 161 537 4980 <+44%20(0)%20161%20537%204980>
> > +44 (0) 7989 717661 <+44%20(0)%207989%20717661>
> > gary.di...@quadris.co.uk
> > http://www/
> > .q%2F&data=05%7C02%7CGary.Dixon%40quadris.co.uk%7Ce9fb365904604570a1
> > 9608dc61461dbf%7Cf1d6abf3d3b44894ae16db0fb93a96a2%7C0%7C0%7C63849220
> > 0978509895%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM
> > zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=yig9%2F5H%2F2T7
> > Q07%2BlcLOCgRfwH8NCvrmBZw0L5Z%2BYTz8%3D&reserved=0
> > uadris.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7CGary.Dixon%40quadris.co.uk%7C6d453f6408
> > 0c
> > 449f243d08dc607a6e5c%7Cf1d6abf3d3b44894ae16db0fb93a96a2%7C0%7C0%7C63
> > 84
> > 91326163464980%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV
> > 2l
> > uMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=tKsAdO2jZBj5q
> > eL
> > CsCSOX0zLNsvyrXSeY7PegUCOBhE%3D&reserved=0
> > Innovation House, 12‑13 Bredbury Business Park Bredbury Park Way,
> > Bredbury, Stockport, SK6 2SN
> >
>
>
> --
> Daan
>


Re: Storage pool stucks in initialized

2024-04-22 Thread Mevludin Blazevic

Hi Wei,

yes it is, an all hosts. What makes me wonder is if Cloudstack would 
automatically enable the storage pool if it is configured on all hosts 
or do I have to manually remove the DB entry and remove the pool of the 
hosts and retry.


Mevludin

Am 22.04.2024 um 09:18 schrieb Wei ZHOU:

Hi,

Please check if package "libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-rbd" has been
installed on all hosts


-Wei

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 9:16 AM Mevludin Blazevic
  wrote:

Hi all,

I tried to add a second Zone-wide storage pool (Ceph-RBD), which fails
with notification "Request failed". The strange thing is that only some
KVM host have added the storage pool and some did not. In addition, no
erros or exception were logged in the management-server logs. Are there
similar experiences?

Mevludin










Re: Storage pool stucks in initialized

2024-04-22 Thread Wei ZHOU
Hi,

Please check if package "libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-rbd" has been
installed on all hosts


-Wei

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 9:16 AM Mevludin Blazevic
 wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I tried to add a second Zone-wide storage pool (Ceph-RBD), which fails
> with notification "Request failed". The strange thing is that only some
> KVM host have added the storage pool and some did not. In addition, no
> erros or exception were logged in the management-server logs. Are there
> similar experiences?
>
> Mevludin
>
>


Storage pool stucks in initialized

2024-04-22 Thread Mevludin Blazevic

Hi all,

I tried to add a second Zone-wide storage pool (Ceph-RBD), which fails 
with notification "Request failed". The strange thing is that only some 
KVM host have added the storage pool and some did not. In addition, no 
erros or exception were logged in the management-server logs. Are there 
similar experiences?


Mevludin