SSL Keystore functionality in CloudStack
I tried looking around to understand the role of SSL Keystore in CS and an exhaustive list of its functionality/Use cases in CS. I couldn't find any documentation that explains about it. Can anyone help me direct to any relevant documentation to understand keystore's role in CS, Thank you, Chandan.
RE: Unable to deploy guest vm
Hello Tejas, May I know whether you can access the DomR via vCenter and check if the DomR has a link local IP Address ( 169.254.x.x) ? Looks like the DomR didn’t get a link local IP Address, Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 4:40 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Unable to deploy guest vm SSVM Console proxy working fine. while trying to create vm from ISO on new setup it throws below exception. 2014-05-30 16:42:20,358 ERROR [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-62:ctx-97ac79ab 10.129.137.199) Unable to execute ping command on DomR (null), domR may not be ready yet. failure due to Exception: java.io.IOException Message: There was a problem while connecting to null:3922 java.io.IOException: There was a problem while connecting to null:3922 Regards, Tejas
RE: F5 and CloudStack
Hello Amin, May I know whether you added Port Forwarding Service to your Network Offering, Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Amin Pashapour [mailto:jol...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 2:21 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: F5 and CloudStack Chandan Purushothama Chandan.Purushothama@... writes: Hello Amin, May I know if you are able to work with a VM deployed in a network created using DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingWithSourceNatService. This will prove that your Guest VLAN range and Public VLAN are valid, Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Amin Pashapour [mailto:jolfa1@...] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 1:09 PM To: users@... Subject: F5 and CloudStack Hi All I am trying to add an F5 BigIP (10.1) into my CloudStack (4.2.1) environment. This is what I have done: 1- Created a network offering with VR to do everything, including Source and Static NAT, except BL using F5BigIP. 2- Created a network based on the offering. Added egress rule for 0.0.0.0/0 for all protocols. 3- Created a VM using Centos template and the network from step 2 4- Added a firewall rule to the public ip of the network for tcp ports 1- 64000. 5- Can't add port forwarding to the public ip. I get into the VM's console and the network is up. However, I can't ping/ssh to any other system. No system can ping/ssh my VM. This is similar to what someone named Anoop had observed in April of 2013. Can someone give me a hint or two on what I am missing? Thanks. Hi Chandan. Other VM's using DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingWithSourceNatService work perfectly fine. I can ssh with no problems. Of course, I had to add a port forwarding rule to let port 22 through. When I try to add a port forwarding rule with the F5 offering network, I get this error: The IP public ip is already used as SourceNAT rather than PortForwarding. And I can't go any further. Thanks
RE: AWS api only for basic networking zones ?
Hello Andrija, AWSAPI feature can be tried on any type of zone. The feature makes more sense if it is used with Basic Zone with Security Groups and Advanced Zone with Security Groups. In case if you just want to try couple of ec2 apis against CloudStack, there is no harm in enabling it and playing with it. You might fail to execute couple of ec2 apis on using the feature against any zone other than the supported zones, Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 1:10 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: AWS api only for basic networking zones ? Hi, I'm looking into enabling the AWS compatible API on CS. But from the docs: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html-single/Installation_Guide/index.html#aws-ec2-introduction ...it states that this is only supported in Basic Networking zones. Since I'm using advanced networking zone, should I even try enabling the AWS thing, or should I give up on this. I'm on CS 4.2.1. Thanks, - Andrija Panić
RE: Internal DNS confusion
Hello Chris, The following link might help you with your efforts to deploy a Quick Cloud using a single machine. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: chris snow [mailto:chsnow...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 10:19 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Internal DNS confusion Hi Shanker, I'm trying to build a self contained cloudstack virtualbox virtualmachine similar to devcloud. I'm thinking that the virtualmachine will need to run its own internal DNS server, but it probably only needs one entry, the hostname of the virtualbox virtualmachine. Sorry if these questions are basic, but I haven't seen any topology examples that describe everything on a single node, so I'm confused what is required. Many thanks, Chris On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Shanker Balan shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com wrote: Comments inline. On 28-Jan-2014, at 12:47 pm, chris snow chsnow...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the answers Shanker. Some more questions ... Sure. Are internal DNS lookups performed only by the system vms? Dont know. If no, what other parts of cloudstack perform internal DNS lookups? Dunno. Never had a requirement/reason to worry about it as my DNS servers are configured to resolve my RFC1918 assigned LAN devices and public records. For example, does Management Server perform internal DNS lookups? The management server uses whichever nameservers you have configured in /etc/resolv.conf. I am not sure why you are digging deep into the DNS settings... its a very simple step while adding a new Zone. Just specify the same DNS settings as used by other devices in your network. I am however aware that there are MANY networks which still use IP addresses instead of hostnames. If your networks happens to rely on IP addresses, now would be a good time to create a DNS system :) I'm trying to figure out 'when' I need to add new records to the internal DNS server. If you plan to use hostnames instead of IP addresses for resources like hypervisors, storage devices etc, then you need to create DNS records. Alternatively, you can also add /etc/hosts entries. Depending on your DNS topology, you might have private internal DNS servers or public hosted DNS services (or both). I guess one way for me to understand when I need to add a host record to the internal DNS is by knowing what which parts of the Cloudstack admin interface have fields that require a corresponding internal DNS record. For example: Network Add Guest Network Network Domain Domains Add Domain Network Domain Does each network domain above require an entry to be added into the internal DNS? Are there any other places in the admin UI that require records to be added to the internal DNS server? I believe Sanjeev already replied to this one. network domains are handled internally by CloudStack virtual routers. Regards. @shankerbalan On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Shanker Balan shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com wrote: Comments inline. On 28-Jan-2014, at 1:21 am, chris snow chsnow...@gmail.com wrote: When creating a new zone, I have to enter the address for Internal DNS Servers. Extract from the Cloudstack installation manual: Internal DNS 1 and Internal DNS 2. These are DNS servers for use by system VMs in the zone (these are VMs used by CloudStack itself, such as virtual routers, console proxies, and Secondary Storage VMs.). The internal DNS server is usually the corporate DNS servers that provide internal DNS services for your LAN. Usually, these are RFC1918 IPs which is why its hosted internally. Question 1: Who manages the Internal DNS? Is an Internal DNS server setup and managed by me, or is it setup and managed by Cloudstack? You (or your IT team). Question 2: If Internal DNS is setup and managed by me, how should it be setup? set it up any way you look. As long as the internal DNS server can resolve the hostname to IP addresses, you should be fine. Question 3: If it is setup and managed by Cloudstack, when did it get setup, and how can I find out what address Cloudstack is using for this server? Its not managed by cloudstack. Most of the time, your internal and external DNS settings would be your corporate DNS server. If a public DNS server can resolve IP addresses for hosts in your LAN, you can use any public DNS server as your internal and external DNS resolver. Hope that makes sense. -- @shankerbalan M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, Bangalore - 560 055 Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for
RE: Unable to deploy instance from ISO to xenserver
Hello Derek,
Looks like the VM deployment failed due to No Storage Pools available to
service your request. If you are planning to use the local storage on XenServer
as your primary storage, you need to use the corresponding Service Offering
that uses a local storage to deploy a VM. May I know whether the service
offering that you used to deploy this VM uses shared or local storage,
Thank you,
Chandan.
-Original Message-
From: Derek Cole [mailto:derek.c...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:04 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Unable to deploy instance from ISO to xenserver
Hello,
I am trying to setup a cloudstack managed xenserver. I had a fresh xenserver
6.2 install, and I was able to upload my ISO. Whenever I try to create an
instance, I get the error that I have pasted below in this email.
In my setup, the cloudstack-management box is hosting an NFS share for the
secondary storage, and when I set up the zone, I made it use local storage on
the xenserver host. That drive is 100% free.
What is going wrong here? Thanks
2014-01-23 13:50:22,737 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-2:null) SeqA 3-39: Processing Seq 3-39: { Cmd ,
MgmtId: -1, via: 3, Ver: v1, Flags: 11,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.ConsoleProxyLoadReportCommand:{_proxyVmId:2,_loadInfo:{\n
\connections\: []\n},wait:0}}] }
2014-01-23 13:50:22,741 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-2:null) SeqA 3-39: Sending Seq 3-39: { Ans: ,
MgmtId: 218269705676436, via: 3, Ver: v1, Flags: 100010,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.AgentControlAnswer:{result:true,wait:0}}] }
2014-01-23 13:50:22,891 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-3:null)
===START=== 10.20.0.18 -- GET
command=deployVirtualMachinezoneId=68a397f1-b141-4818-8999-7eb9d2cf39fctemplateId=ad6163bf-b4b2-4d68-a9eb-fece57c975cehypervisor=XenServerserviceOfferingId=0e564524-751a-41a3-aed6-dc2344045e2ddiskOfferingId=636ab890-4f91-43b3-a50d-0af1e6e40352networkIds=0e1c8d43-7714-4de1-99d5-8344a33affb7response=jsonsessionkey=MZcKlC%2BbG5N5o1F9aUej178nY%2F0%3D_=1390503666841
2014-01-23 13:50:22,899 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher]
(catalina-exec-3:null) InfrastructureEntity name
is:com.cloud.offering.ServiceOffering
2014-01-23 13:50:22,903 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher]
(catalina-exec-3:null) ControlledEntity name
is:com.cloud.template.VirtualMachineTemplate
2014-01-23 13:50:22,907 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher]
(catalina-exec-3:null) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.network.Network
2014-01-23 13:50:22,911 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher]
(catalina-exec-3:null) InfrastructureEntity name
is:com.cloud.offering.DiskOffering
2014-01-23 13:50:22,926 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl]
(catalina-exec-3:null) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network
id=204
2014-01-23 13:50:22,938 DEBUG [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-3:null) Allocating in the DB for vm
2014-01-23 13:50:22,950 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-3:null) Allocating entries for VM:
VM[User|78138d6d-d15a-42c9-b406-a229c04d065d]
2014-01-23 13:50:22,951 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-3:null) Allocating nics for
VM[User|78138d6d-d15a-42c9-b406-a229c04d065d]
2014-01-23 13:50:22,952 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-3:null) Allocating nic for vm
VM[User|78138d6d-d15a-42c9-b406-a229c04d065d] in network Ntwk[204|Guest|8] with
requested profile NicProfile[0-0-null-null-null
2014-01-23 13:50:22,968 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl]
(catalina-exec-3:null) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network
id=204
2014-01-23 13:50:22,970 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-3:null) Allocating disks for
VM[User|78138d6d-d15a-42c9-b406-a229c04d065d]
2014-01-23 13:50:22,981 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-3:null) Allocation completed for VM:
VM[User|78138d6d-d15a-42c9-b406-a229c04d065d]
2014-01-23 13:50:22,981 DEBUG [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-3:null) Successfully allocated DB entry for
VM[User|78138d6d-d15a-42c9-b406-a229c04d065d]
2014-01-23 13:50:23,009 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl]
(catalina-exec-3:null) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network
id=204
2014-01-23 13:50:23,014 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl]
(catalina-exec-3:null) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network
id=204
2014-01-23 13:50:23,030 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-3:null) submit async job-43 = [
ab3b4b08-3667-4044-b061-ae7721482e94 ], details: AsyncJobVO {id:43, userId:
2, accountId: 2, sessionKey: null, instanceType: VirtualMachine,
instanceId: 11, cmd: org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DeployVMCmd,
cmdOriginator: null, cmdInfo:
RE: Virtual Guest Cidr is not RFC1918 compliant advance networking CS4.2
It is as per design. You can use any of the networks mentioned in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1918 3. Private Address Space The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) has reserved the following three blocks of the IP address space for private internets: 10.0.0.0- 10.255.255.255 (10/8 prefix) 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 (172.16/12 prefix) 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255 (192.168/16 prefix) Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 9:55 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Virtual Guest Cidr is not RFC1918 compliant advance networking CS4.2 Hello, when creating a new network using cloudmonkey i get the following error Virtual Guest CIDR is not RFC1918 Compliant any idea how to bypass this problem? Thanks,
RE: Urgent: Revert disk from expunging state
Hello, Expunging is the last state of a Volume in its life cycle. Even if the database record is updated from Expunging to Ready, the physical disk volume present on the primary storage might have already got purged, Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 11:19 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Urgent: Revert disk from expunging state On 16.01.2014 17:43, Paolo De Marco wrote: Hello, i have a disk in State: Expunging. Is there a way to revert it to Ready? Thanks Hi, You can do so directly in the database. Phpmyadmin should be handy. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
RE: XenServer 6.2 SP1
Hello Francois, As far as I know, XenServer 6.2 GA is a different from XenServer 6.2 SP1. I know that 4.2 Supports XenServer 6.2 GA. But I don't think 4.2 officially supports XenServer 6.2 SP1. It might work, but I don't think it is tested with 4.2, Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2014 8:16 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: XenServer 6.2 SP1 Interesting. I'm glad I asked beforehand :P Thanks Prashant (and Shanker) :) On 1/1/2014, 11:11 AM, Shanker Balan wrote: On 01-Jan-2014, at 9:32 pm, Prashant Sreedharan prashant.sreedha...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Francois, XenServer 6.2 is supported only for fresh install of CloudPlatform 4.2. However, XS 6.2 is fully supported from 4.2.1. Hmm, that explains why I ran into issues after upgrading my environment to SP1. I recreated the Zone and its been working well so far. For your reference please find the compatibility matrix below: http://support.citrix.com/cms/kc/cloud-troubleshooting/cloudplatform- compat ibility-matrix/ Thanks. -- @shankerbalan M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, Bangalore - 560 055 Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 08/09 January 2014, Londonhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 13-17 January 2014, GLOBAL. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 20-24 January 2014, GLOBAL. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@cloudops.com 514-629-6775 - - - CloudOps 420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_
RE: How to update dns server name
Hello DuJun, Kindly note that the changed DNS information doesn't get automatically updated on your system VMs. You might have to stop and start your system VMs for the update to happen, Thank you, Chandan Original message From: Suresh Sadhu Date:12/30/2013 8:54 AM (GMT-08:00) To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: How to update dns server name You can directly update from UI.login with admin user and navigate to Infrastructure-zone-edit zone and change the public and private dns details. Regards sadhu -Original Message- From: Steven Liang [mailto:stevenli...@yesup.com] Sent: 30 December 2013 20:45 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: How to update dns server name Hi Dujun, You can try to modify them in table data_center. Steven On 12/30/2013 09:41 AM, Du Jun wrote: Hi all, How can I update dns server name of Cloudstack? When we create a zone, we are required to add public dns server name and internal dns server name. And how can we update them after enabling zone? As one of my dns server could not work anymore. Can I update some tables of mysql database directly? Thanks! ps: I am the root of my cluster. -- Best regards, DuJun
RE: Regarding cloudstack automation
Hello Umesh,
From the logs that you posted, it appears to me that your command for
deployment of VM got fired to the setup correctly. It looks like the VM
deployment failed on the setup. Can you kindly check your cloudstack
management server logs for the error information in order to understand the
root cause for the issue,
Thank you,
Chandan
Original message
From: Santhosh Edukulla
Date:12/30/2013 4:20 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org,Chandan Purushothama
Cc: Sudha Ponnaganti
Subject: RE: Regarding cloudstack automation
Umesh,
One question : Did you registered the template for ostype: ostype:
'CentOS 5.3 (64-bit)'?
Regards,
Santhosh
From: umesh kute [umeshvk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 6:32 AM
To: Chandan Purushothama
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Sudha Ponnaganti
Subject: Re: Regarding cloudstack automation
Hi Chandan,
Thanks for your response.
I have the latest Marvin repository (December 20th). I am able to proceed
further. There was an issue of firewall for that machine and it got resolved.
But now i am getting another error when i tried to run the script
test_deploy_vm.py
I have attached the log. Can somebody please have a look on it and help me in
resolving the issue?
++
test_deploy_vm (integration.smoke.test_deploy_vm.TestDeployVM): CRITICAL:
EXCEPTION: test_deploy_vm: Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/unittest/case.py, line 327, in run
testMethod()
File /DataDisk/temp/cloudstack/test/integration/smoke/test_deploy_vm.py,
line 116, in test_deploy_vm
templateid=self.template.idhttp://self.template.id
File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/marvin/integration/lib/base.py,
line 415, in create
virtual_machine = apiclient.deployVirtualMachine(cmd, method=method)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/marvin/cloudstackAPI/cloudstackAPIClient.py,
line 593, in deployVirtualMachine
response = self.connection.marvinRequest(command, response_type=response,
method=method)
File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/marvin/cloudstackConnection.py,
line 280, in marvinRequest
response = self.poll(asyncJobId, response_type)
File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/marvin/cloudstackConnection.py,
line 86, in poll
asyncquery, asyncResonse.jobresult)
cloudstackAPIException: Execute cmd: asyncquery failed, due to: {errorcode :
533, errortext : u'Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|testvmshr]'}
++
PFA entire logs.
Please let me know in case if anything is required.
Thanks and Regards
-- Umesh Kute
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Chandan Purushothama
chandan.purushoth...@citrix.commailto:chandan.purushoth...@citrix.com wrote:
Hello Umesh,
I had a similar experience with an older Marvin build. I updated mine to the
latest and tried again and it worked. I recommend you to kindly try again with
the latest Marvin build and see if you are able to work with the automation
framework,
Thank you,
Chandan
Original message
From: umesh kute
Date:12/26/2013 12:29 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org,Sudha
Ponnaganti
Subject: Re: Regarding cloudstack automation
Hi All,
I have created a Marvin setup on CentOS6.3 by following the document:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Marvin+-+Testing+with+Python
All the pre-requisites are installed successfully.
I tried to run the sample script test_deploy_vm.py
(cloudstack/test/integration/smoke/), I am getting following error:
[root@localhost smoke]# nosetests --with-marvin
--marvin-config=/DataDisk/temp/cloudstack/tools/marvin/dist/demo.cfg --load
test_deploy_vm.py
Exception Occurred Under __deployDC :
HTTPConnectionPool(host='10.88.91.100', port=8096): Max retries exceeded
with url: /client/api?account=admincommand=listUsersresponse=json (Caused
by class 'socket.error': [Errno 110] Connection timed out)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/bin/nosetests, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('nose==1.3.0', 'console_scripts', 'nosetests')()
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose-1.3.0-py2.7.egg/nose/core.py,
line 118, in __init__
**extra_args)
File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/unittest/main.py, line 95, in __init__
self.runTests()
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose-1.3.0-py2.7.egg/nose/core.py,
line 197, in runTests
result = self.testRunner.run(self.test)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose-1.3.0-py2.7.egg/nose/core.py,
line 61, in run
test(result)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose-1.3.0-py2.7.egg/nose
RE: Unable to create a deployment for VM
Hello Sabareesh,
The logs doesn't show the root cause of the problem you have seen on your
setup. The Insufficient Server Capacity Exception that you have seen might have
been thrown for the following reasons.
1. The host on which the VM previously resided on before stopping it, is no
longer suitable to start the VM on.
2. There is no other host available in the cluster that can reach the primary
storage on which the ROOT Volume is present.
Kindly search the logs for information that can help us understand the cause of
Reason 1,
Regarding Avoid Set:
Whenever user deploys or starts a stopped VM, the deployment planner plans the
resources required for deploying or starting the VM. Avoid set is a memory data
structure that is specific for the thread that is executing the request for VM
deployment or VM Start Operation. During the execution of the request, the host
picked for deploying or starting a VM is added to the Avoid Set. This will help
the planner not to retry VM deployment or VM start operation on this host if
there was a failure in its first attempt to use that particular host. Avoid Set
is of no use if the VM got successfully deployed or started on its first
attempt to use that host. Since the avoid set is a thread specific data
structure, the information stored in it will be garbage collected after the
death of the thread that is executing the request,
Hope the above information helps you,
Thank you,
Chandan.
-Original Message-
From: remala sabareesh [mailto:rd.sabare...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2013 11:41 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Unable to create a deployment for VM
Hi,
I am able to setup succesfully the cloudstack and created the instances
running successfully, i am able to stop and start the instances succesfully.
but suddenly after stopping and starting the instance it gives me following
exception... may i know what is the reason when i am checking the logs it shows
like host is avoid set, pod is avoid set... and finally throws the insufficent
server capacity exception.
May i know what is the avoid set how to overcome this issue... if it is the
insufficient server capacity issue it should throw this exception long back.
but it is started throwing exception today onwards...
iam confused and stuck pls help me on this below is the logs pasted
2013-12-30 10:52:37,434 DEBUG [agent.manager.
AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-14:null) SeqA 2-24333: Sending Seq
2-24333: { Ans: , MgmtId: 90591532766, via: 2, Ver: v1, Flags: 100010,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.AgentControlAnswer:{result:true,wait:0}}] }
2013-12-30 10:52:39,290 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
(StatsCollector-2:null) HostStatsCollector is running...
2013-12-30 10:52:39,811 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-15:null) ===START=== 10.203.251.143 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResultjobId=4333d42a-03b4-4500-97db-429e744df78bresponse=jsonsessionkey=7JJVl1vgRpS%2FxVXGO1y4KyXksYo%3D_=1388380873338
2013-12-30 10:52:39,889 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-15:null) ===END=== 10.203.251.143 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResultjobId=4333d42a-03b4-4500-97db-429e744df78bresponse=jsonsessionkey=7JJVl1vgRpS%2FxVXGO1y4KyXksYo%3D_=1388380873338
2013-12-30 10:52:42,811 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-13:null) ===START=== 10.203.251.143 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResultjobId=4333d42a-03b4-4500-97db-429e744df78bresponse=jsonsessionkey=7JJVl1vgRpS%2FxVXGO1y4KyXksYo%3D_=1388380876338
2013-12-30 10:52:42,882 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-13:null) ===END=== 10.203.251.143 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResultjobId=4333d42a-03b4-4500-97db-429e744df78bresponse=jsonsessionkey=7JJVl1vgRpS%2FxVXGO1y4KyXksYo%3D_=1388380876338
2013-12-30 10:52:43,115 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(StatsCollector-2:null) Seq 1-1087657629: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
90591532766, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetHostStatsAnswer } }
2013-12-30 10:52:45,814 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-12:null) ===START=== 10.203.251.143 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResultjobId=4333d42a-03b4-4500-97db-429e744df78bresponse=jsonsessionkey=7JJVl1vgRpS%2FxVXGO1y4KyXksYo%3D_=1388380879340
2013-12-30 10:52:45,883 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-12:null) ===END=== 10.203.251.143 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResultjobId=4333d42a-03b4-4500-97db-429e744df78bresponse=jsonsessionkey=7JJVl1vgRpS%2FxVXGO1y4KyXksYo%3D_=1388380879340
2013-12-30 10:52:47,358 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-1:null) SeqA 2-24334: Processing Seq 2-24334: { Cmd ,
MgmtId: -1, via: 2, Ver: v1, Flags: 11,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.ConsoleProxyLoadReportCommand:{_proxyVmId:2,_loadInfo:{\n
\connections\: []\n},wait:0}}] }
2013-12-30 10:52:47,424 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-1:null) SeqA 2-24334: Sending Seq 2-24334: { Ans: ,
MgmtId: 90591532766, via: 2, Ver: v1, Flags: 100010,
