Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon?
Hi, Just in case you aren't aware, you can build 4.2.1 yourself via https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.1/ However, you'll see from my Build debs for 4.2.1 thread that I'm having a bit of difficulty in doing so at the moment. Best regards *Graeme Lambert* On 09/12/13 15:22, Adrian Lewis wrote: Do we have any projected dates for the official 4.2.1 release yet? I understand that there's an ACL disclosure issue that is under discussion as a potential blocker but I can't quite work out whether there has been any progress on this. -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 November 2013 18:11 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon? On Nov 27, 2013, at 6:52 PM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Hi Sebastien, Thanks for the reply and the link - I never knew about that option. Are these RPMs likely to be upgrade-safe if I configure the mgmt. server with the relevant yum repo at a later date? These rpms are built from the 4.2 branch, so they represent the latest on that branch and may differ slightly (be ahead ~4.2.2) from what we voted on for 4.2.1 I have not tried that type of upgrade, which If I understand you right, may actually be a 'downgrade'. That said it should only be bug fix changes so the schemas should not change. My advice would be to wait couple days for the official 4.2.1 but if you are eager you can grab those rpms and start ironing out your upgrade procedure (from where you are at to ~4.2.1) on your dev systems. Cheers, Adrian -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 November 2013 17:33 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon? On Nov 27, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Hi All, Hoping that someone here might know what's holding up the release of 4.2.1? A vote was cast back on the 12th Nov which appeared to be all fine with everyone eventually. Citrix have released Cloudplatform 4.2.1. As far as I can tell, the only thing missing was finalising the release notes but these too seem to be finished. Has CCCEU13 killed off all of the momentum to release 4.2.1 or is there something else going on that I've missed? You have not missed anything. It's just lack of time in the day to check the final docs, make the release announcement etc.. I appreciate that beggars can't be choosers but I'm too scared to try building from source and am eagerly awaiting the 'easy' option of having RPMs made from an officially sanctioned release. You can always get the latest rpms from: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.2/job/package-rhel63-4.2/ Even though they are not the official release ones (and won't be since we only release source tar ball) Any info on this welcomed. Many thanks, Adrian
Re: ACS 4.2 Error adding S3/Ceph secondary storage
Hi, Just to confirm, has this been resolved in the 4.2.1 release as expected? Best regards *Graeme Lambert* On 18/11/13 18:05, Min Chen wrote: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Migration+of+NFS+Sec ondary+Storage+to+Object+Store
Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon?
Hi, Has the S3 secondary storage / NFS secondary storage issue been resolved? Unless I'm missing it I can't see it in that list of issues but I thought it was supposed to be fixed in 4.2.1? Best regards *Graeme Lambert* On 28/11/13 11:19, Nux! wrote: On 28.11.2013 05:24, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Animesh Here is the list of issues that are fixed https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325707. This being a maintenance release there are no new features Great, thanks! :)
Re: ACS 4.2 Error adding S3/Ceph secondary storage
Hi Min, Thanks for that. If I remove the NFS storage I've got now and for some reason either can't get S3 to work or decide I want to put the old NFS storage back in, is that possible? How do I migrate what is in the secondary storage to S3? Best regards *Graeme Lambert* On 14/11/13 17:39, Min Chen wrote: Migrating existing NFS to S3 will be supported in 4.2.1, see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Migration+of+NFS+Sec ondary+Storage+to+Object+Store for details. At this moment, you can only add a region-wide S3 when there is no NFS secondary storage existing. When you add S3 into system, system vm templates will be automatically uploaded to S3. Thanks -min On 11/14/13 9:05 AM, Graeme Lambert glamb...@adepteo.net wrote: Hi, Did anyone have an update to this thread in October? I've got exactly the same issue as Andrei. Thanks Graeme Copied from: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-users/201310.mbox/%3C2 6396290.1815.1382555479284.JavaMail.andrei@finka%3E Thanks. I just don't know hot can I add it now. I've got the existing secondary storage over nfs and if i delete it, would I not loose the data? Most likely the data will not be removed from the storage server itself, but all references will be removed i suspect. So, what is the best way to proceed I wonder? Tha nks - Original Message - From: Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org, John Burwell jburw...@basho.com, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl Sent: Wednesday, 23 October, 2013 6:19:49 PM Subject: Re: ACS 4.2 Error adding S3/Ceph secondary storage Adding John and Wido to the thread, they should know On Oct 23, 2013, at 7:25 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote: Sanjeev, Thanks for the information. Does anyone know of the best way to migrate from nfs secondary storage to S3? At the moment, my NFS storage is used for storing templates, including system vm templates. Is it safe for me to remove it and create the new S3 secondary storage? Would it copy systemvm templates onto a new storage automatically or do I have to manually do that? If so, how would I copy the systemvm template onto a non-NFS storage? Many thanks - Original Message - From: Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 23 October, 2013 6:35:38 AM Subject: RE: ACS 4.2 Error adding S3/Ceph secondary storage That means one of the zones in your setup may be having NFS as the secondary storage provider. Make sure that none of the zones use NFS for secondary storage if you want to use S3 . -Original Message- From: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 7:43 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: ACS 4.2 Error adding S3/Ceph secondary storage Hello guys, I am trying to add a new secondary storage provided by Ceph's S3 radosgw, which i've configured and tested. Right after adding it via the GUI I have the following message/error: You can only add new image stores from the same provider NFS already added Does anyone know what this message means? I am a bit confused here as I am not adding the NFS secondary storage, but instead adding the S3 storage. Cheers Andrei
Re: Ubuntu provisioning
Thanks! Best regards *Graeme Lambert* On 14/11/13 16:17, Rafael Weingartner wrote: I did, to change the hostname on the provisioning moment I followed this tutorial: http://www.greenhills.co.uk/2013/08/30/creating-ubuntu-templates-for-cloudstack.html to change the root/anyuser through the CS UI: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Admin_Guide/add-password-management-to-templates.html 2013/11/14 Graeme Lambert glamb...@adepteo.net Hi, Are there any official or recommended scripts to provision an Ubuntu template when a new instance is created? At the minute I'm having to go through and change the hostname etc. when I create a new instance even though I'm setting it in Cloudstack. -- Best regards *Graeme Lambert*
