RE: Adding hosts of different CPU to the new zone

2014-03-24 Thread Marcel Keller
Hey Nancy,

The CPUs in an Cluster must be homogenous and not in a Zone... So just add a 
new cluster in CS and add all the AMD based server to it...

-Original Message-
From: iStar Cloud [mailto:sanotecna...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Montag, 24. März 2014 09:38
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Adding hosts of different CPU to the new zone

Hi everyone,

I tried to add new hosts to the existing zone whose hosts are of XenServer 
based o n Intel processors. But the new ones I was trying to add are of the 
same hipervisor based on AMD processors. And it failed.
After reviewing document, I figured that each host of the same hipervisor shoud 
be homogeneous in CPU configurations.
Then if I create a new zone, is it possible to add hosts that are AMD based in 
it?



Regards,
Nancy


RE: Creating Windows Server 2012 template for KVM

2013-09-10 Thread Marcel Keller
It's the same process... sysprep is  still available under 
%systemdrive%\windows\system32\

-Original Message-
From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id] 
Sent: Dienstag, 10. September 2013 11:21
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Creating Windows Server 2012 template for KVM

Dear all,

I checked the documentation on creating Windows servers templates using 
sysprep, and there is instruction on how to create the templates for Windows 
Server 2008 R2 and Windows Server 2003 R2, but there's no specific instruction 
for Windows Server 2012.

http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.1/html/Admin_Guide/create-windows-template.html

Can we use the same method for Windows Server 2012?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.


RE: realhostip.com timeouts

2013-05-06 Thread Marcel Keller
If you change the FQDN the your mgmt. servers hostname - you have to make sure 
that you run your own DNS Service to resolve the PUBLIC IP Adresses...

That should help:

http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX133468 

-Original Message-
From: ronald higgins [mailto:ronald.higg...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Montag, 6. Mai 2013 14:19
To: users
Subject: Re: realhostip.com timeouts

Thanks Nux!. I've changed the consoleproxy.url.domain value to the FQDN of the 
MGMT server and restarted the management service.
 Opening a console though is still resulting in an error resolving the host on 
realhostip.com.

Firefox can't find the server at SRV_PUB_ADDRESS.realhostip.com.



Any thoughts?


On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Nux!  wrote:

> On 06.05.2013 11:17, ronald higgins wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I'm getting timeouts trying to resolve realhostip.com . Is there an 
>> issue with the service?
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> You should replace realhostip.com with your server's fqdn hostname in 
> the Settings. IP address might work, too, AFAIK.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>


management server startup - database integrity

2013-04-05 Thread Marcel Keller
Folks, i tried to earn some experience with Cloudstack. Everything is
working well but since yesterday i have some trouble when i try to start my
management servers.

I always get a:

seUpgradeChecker - DatabaseUpgradeChecker
2013-04-05 16:19:10,465 INFO  [utils.component.ComponentLocator]
(main:null) Adding system integrity checker: DatabaseUpgradeChecker
2013-04-05 16:19:10,537 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
(main:null) Encryption Type: file
2013-04-05 16:19:10,623 INFO  [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseIntegrityChecker]
(main:null) Grabbing lock to check for database integrity.
2013-04-05 16:19:10,894 INFO  [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseIntegrityChecker]
(main:null) Performing database integrity check

the server hangs in that state since one hour

The mysql servers are available...

any ideas?


RE: How do you work around the 4096 VLANs limitation?

2013-03-28 Thread Marcel Keller
I apologize for that, that was my mistake. Lets say in future releases...

-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] 
Sent: Donnerstag, 28. März 2013 16:19
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: pytho...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: How do you work around the 4096 VLANs limitation?

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 02:48:16PM +, Marcel Keller wrote:
> At the moment, the only way is to add additional availability zones, however 
> there are some plans to support VXLAN with Felton Release!

Marcel,

Apache CloudStack has no such "release" called Felton.  Please don't discuss a 
commercial product that happens to be based on CloudStack as if it is 
CloudStack.

As for VXLAN support, it has only been discussed within the context of adding 
ASA 1000v support (and within that discussion it was moved to "open items" in 
the spec).

If folks think this is a good addition, please weigh in here or on the dev list.


RE: How do you work around the 4096 VLANs limitation?

2013-03-28 Thread Marcel Keller
At the moment, the only way is to add additional availability zones, however 
there are some plans to support VXLAN with Felton Release!


Marcel Keller
__
Cloud Implementation Engineer – Worldwide Cloud Consulting

Citrix Systems GmbH | Am Soeldnermoos 17 | D-85399 Hallbergmoos
Mob: +49 151 140 587 01 
marcel.kel...@citrix.com
http://www.citrix.com
 
Citrix Systems GmbH
Geschäftsführer: Carlos Sartorius | Scott Herren
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hallbergmoos
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRB 113576
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
This e-mail message and all documents which accompany it are intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity to which addressed, and may contain 
privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized disclosure or 
distribution of this e-mail message is prohibited. If you have received this 
e-mail message in error, please notify me immediately. Thank you.



-Original Message-
From: Wang Fei [mailto:pytho...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Donnerstag, 28. März 2013 15:35
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: How do you work around the 4096 VLANs limitation?

It is understood that the maximum number of VLAN is 4096 in advanced zone.
and it is very common one account can own 3-4 VLANs in practice. maybe more. 
therefore hundreds of account can be only supported in one zone.  how you 
beyond this limitation? To add more zones?




best regards