from:"Mindaugas Milinavičius"

Re: CloudStack 14.18.0 Can't mount cpvm secondary storage

2023-07-28 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Thank you!

On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 6:49 AM Jithin Raju 
wrote:

> Hi Mindaugas,
>
> CPVM doesn’t require access to secondary storage. You can avoid running
> the script ‘ssvm-check.sh’ on CPVM.
>
> -Jithin
>
> From: Mindaugas Milinavičius 
> Date: Friday, 28 July 2023 at 12:27 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Subject: CloudStack 14.18.0 Can't mount cpvm secondary storage
> Hello everyone,
>
> with ssvm - without any problem, all working good, with cpvm - can't mount
> nfs secondary storage.
>
> I tried mount manually - without problem. ping going.
>
> Anyone have this problem?
>
>
>
> root@s-8-VM:/usr/local/cloud/systemvm# ./ssvm-check.sh
> 
> First DNS server is  1.1.1.1
> PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=60 time=0.933 ms
> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=1.004 ms
> --- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics ---
> 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.933/0.969/1.004/0.036 ms
> Good: Can ping DNS server
> 
> Good: DNS resolves cloudstack.apache.org
> 
> nfs is currently mounted
> Mount point is /mnt/SecStorage/a8305a6a-a24a-3d7b-875a-584b6157a348
> Good: Can write to mount point
> 
> Management server is 185.*,10.0.11.31. Checking connectivity.
> Good: Can connect to management server 185.* port 8250
> Good: Can connect to management server 10.0.11.31 port 8250
> 
> Good: Java process is running
> 
> Tests Complete. Look for ERROR or WARNING above.
> root@s-8-VM:/usr/local/cloud/systemvm#
>
>
>
>
>
> root@v-10-VM:/usr/local/cloud/systemvm# ./ssvm-check.sh
> 
> First DNS server is  1.1.1.1
> PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=60 time=1.063 ms
> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=0.936 ms
> --- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics ---
> 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.936/1.000/1.063/0.064 ms
> Good: Can ping DNS server
> 
> Good: DNS resolves cloudstack.apache.org
> 
> ERROR: Storage nfs is not currently mounted
> Verifying if we can at least ping the storage
> Storage address is empty, trying to ping storage network gateway instead ()
> ping: missing host operand
> Try 'ping --help' or 'ping --usage' for more information.
> WARNING: Cannot ping nfs storage network gateway
> routing table follows
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> Iface
> 0.0.0.0 185.* 0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth2
> 1.1.1.1 10.0.11.254 255.255.255.255 UGH   0  00
> eth1
> 10.0.0.010.0.11.254 255.0.0.0   UG0  00
> eth1
> 10.0.11.0   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00
> eth1
> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0  00
> eth0
> 172.16.0.0  10.0.11.254 255.240.0.0 UG0  00
> eth1
> 185.*   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth2
> 185.* 10.0.11.254 255.255.255.255 UGH   0  00 eth1
> 192.168.0.0 10.0.11.254 255.255.0.0 UG0  00
> eth1
> 
> Management server is 185.*,10.0.11.31. Checking connectivity.
> Good: Can connect to management server 185.* port 8250
> Good: Can connect to management server 10.0.11.31 port 8250
> 
> Good: Java process is running
> 
> Tests Complete. Look for ERROR or WARNING above.
> root@v-10-VM:/usr/local/cloud/systemvm#
>
>
>
>

CloudStack 14.18.0 Can't mount cpvm secondary storage

2023-07-27 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello everyone,

with ssvm - without any problem, all working good, with cpvm - can't mount
nfs secondary storage.

I tried mount manually - without problem. ping going.

Anyone have this problem?



root@s-8-VM:/usr/local/cloud/systemvm# ./ssvm-check.sh

First DNS server is  1.1.1.1
PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=60 time=0.933 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=1.004 ms
--- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.933/0.969/1.004/0.036 ms
Good: Can ping DNS server

Good: DNS resolves cloudstack.apache.org

nfs is currently mounted
Mount point is /mnt/SecStorage/a8305a6a-a24a-3d7b-875a-584b6157a348
Good: Can write to mount point

Management server is 185.*,10.0.11.31. Checking connectivity.
Good: Can connect to management server 185.* port 8250
Good: Can connect to management server 10.0.11.31 port 8250

Good: Java process is running

Tests Complete. Look for ERROR or WARNING above.
root@s-8-VM:/usr/local/cloud/systemvm#





root@v-10-VM:/usr/local/cloud/systemvm# ./ssvm-check.sh

First DNS server is  1.1.1.1
PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=60 time=1.063 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=0.936 ms
--- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.936/1.000/1.063/0.064 ms
Good: Can ping DNS server

Good: DNS resolves cloudstack.apache.org

ERROR: Storage nfs is not currently mounted
Verifying if we can at least ping the storage
Storage address is empty, trying to ping storage network gateway instead ()
ping: missing host operand
Try 'ping --help' or 'ping --usage' for more information.
WARNING: Cannot ping nfs storage network gateway
routing table follows
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
0.0.0.0 185.* 0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth2
1.1.1.1 10.0.11.254 255.255.255.255 UGH   0  00 eth1
10.0.0.010.0.11.254 255.0.0.0   UG0  00 eth1
10.0.11.0   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0  00 eth0
172.16.0.0  10.0.11.254 255.240.0.0 UG0  00 eth1
185.*   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth2
185.* 10.0.11.254 255.255.255.255 UGH   0  00 eth1
192.168.0.0 10.0.11.254 255.255.0.0 UG0  00 eth1

Management server is 185.*,10.0.11.31. Checking connectivity.
Good: Can connect to management server 185.* port 8250
Good: Can connect to management server 10.0.11.31 port 8250

Good: Java process is running

Tests Complete. Look for ERROR or WARNING above.
root@v-10-VM:/usr/local/cloud/systemvm#

Re: cloudstack Can't find at least one running router!

2020-09-07 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

Doesn't matter now, we decide to move from cloudstack to openstack and from
scaleio to linbit



Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€2.50)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€5.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€20.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€40.00)



On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 1:59 PM Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

> Hi Mindaugas,
>
> What error are you seeing in the logs? ScaleIO isn't natively supported in
> CloudStack yet (at least until 4.14), are you using that as block storage
> for NFS?
>
>
> Regards.
>
> ____
> From: Mindaugas Milinavičius 
> Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2020 16:28
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: cloudstack Can't find at least one running router!
>
> Yes, restarted network with clean up but did not helped.
>
> Just now found that is redundant router is enabled, just change via mysql
> redundant to 0 - router is up!
>
> But now another problem with errors, then errors starting, we can't
> shutdown, start, restart vm's :(
>
> Pagarbiai
> Mindaugas Milinavičius
> UAB STARNITA
> Direktorius
> http://www.clustspace.com
> LT: +37068882880
> RU: +7913933
>
> Tomorrow's possibilities today
> <http://www.clustspace.com/>
>
>- 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€2.50)
>- 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€5.00)
>- 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€10.00)
>- 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€20.00)
>- 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€40.00)
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 1:41 PM Andrija Panic 
> wrote:
>
> > Restart the network/VPC with a "cleanup"?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 11:16, Mindaugas Milinavičius <
> > mindau...@clustspace.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Few days ago we found that our virtual router get a lot of error.
> > >
> > > EXT4-fs error like find_extent or remove space truncate and so on
> (can't
> > > copy from the screenshot:( )
> > >
> > > We decide to reboot few times VR - after reboot all VM's started, but
> in
> > > next few h after reboot situation the same: errors and so on.
> > >
> > > We tried to delete vr and force to start new one - the same errors.
> Tried
> > > to reboot few times for auto-fsck did not helped and its totally
> died...
> > >
> > > Does anyone have any idea how to start router? We tryed everything what
> > we
> > > knew
> > >
> > > ACS 14.13.1
> > > XenCenter6.5
> > > ScaleIO
> > >
> > > 2020-09-03 04:12:04,900 ERROR [o.c.n.r.d.RouterDeploymentDefinition]
> > > (Work-Job-Executor-3:ctx-957682bf job-40817/job-40819 ctx-575b792c)
> > > (logid:b6a59be5) Didn't support redundant virtual router without public
> > > network!
> > > 2020-09-03 04:12:04,903 INFO  [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > > (Work-Job-Executor-3:ctx-957682bf job-40817/job-40819 ctx-575b792c)
> > > (logid:b6a59be5)
> > > *Unable to contact
> > > resource.com.cloud.exception.ResourceUnavailableException: Resource
> > > [DataCenter:2] is unreachable: Can't find at least one running router!*
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> com.cloud.network.element.VirtualRouterElement.prepare(VirtualRouterElement.java:281)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.NetworkOrchestrator.prepareElement(NetworkOrchestrator.java:1380)
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andrija Panić
> >
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Re: cloudstack Can't find at least one running router!

2020-09-03 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Yes, restarted network with clean up but did not helped.

Just now found that is redundant router is enabled, just change via mysql
redundant to 0 - router is up!

But now another problem with errors, then errors starting, we can't
shutdown, start, restart vm's :(

Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€2.50)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€5.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€20.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€40.00)



On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 1:41 PM Andrija Panic 
wrote:

> Restart the network/VPC with a "cleanup"?
>
>
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 11:16, Mindaugas Milinavičius <
> mindau...@clustspace.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Few days ago we found that our virtual router get a lot of error.
> >
> > EXT4-fs error like find_extent or remove space truncate and so on (can't
> > copy from the screenshot:( )
> >
> > We decide to reboot few times VR - after reboot all VM's started, but in
> > next few h after reboot situation the same: errors and so on.
> >
> > We tried to delete vr and force to start new one - the same errors. Tried
> > to reboot few times for auto-fsck did not helped and its totally died...
> >
> > Does anyone have any idea how to start router? We tryed everything what
> we
> > knew
> >
> > ACS 14.13.1
> > XenCenter6.5
> > ScaleIO
> >
> > 2020-09-03 04:12:04,900 ERROR [o.c.n.r.d.RouterDeploymentDefinition]
> > (Work-Job-Executor-3:ctx-957682bf job-40817/job-40819 ctx-575b792c)
> > (logid:b6a59be5) Didn't support redundant virtual router without public
> > network!
> > 2020-09-03 04:12:04,903 INFO  [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > (Work-Job-Executor-3:ctx-957682bf job-40817/job-40819 ctx-575b792c)
> > (logid:b6a59be5)
> > *Unable to contact
> > resource.com.cloud.exception.ResourceUnavailableException: Resource
> > [DataCenter:2] is unreachable: Can't find at least one running router!*
> > at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.network.element.VirtualRouterElement.prepare(VirtualRouterElement.java:281)
> > at
> >
> >
> org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.NetworkOrchestrator.prepareElement(NetworkOrchestrator.java:1380)
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
>

cloudstack Can't find at least one running router!

2020-09-03 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

Few days ago we found that our virtual router get a lot of error.

EXT4-fs error like find_extent or remove space truncate and so on (can't
copy from the screenshot:( )

We decide to reboot few times VR - after reboot all VM's started, but in
next few h after reboot situation the same: errors and so on.

We tried to delete vr and force to start new one - the same errors. Tried
to reboot few times for auto-fsck did not helped and its totally died...

Does anyone have any idea how to start router? We tryed everything what we
knew

ACS 14.13.1
XenCenter6.5
ScaleIO

2020-09-03 04:12:04,900 ERROR [o.c.n.r.d.RouterDeploymentDefinition]
(Work-Job-Executor-3:ctx-957682bf job-40817/job-40819 ctx-575b792c)
(logid:b6a59be5) Didn't support redundant virtual router without public
network!
2020-09-03 04:12:04,903 INFO  [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-3:ctx-957682bf job-40817/job-40819 ctx-575b792c)
(logid:b6a59be5)
*Unable to contact
resource.com.cloud.exception.ResourceUnavailableException: Resource
[DataCenter:2] is unreachable: Can't find at least one running router!*
at
com.cloud.network.element.VirtualRouterElement.prepare(VirtualRouterElement.java:281)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.NetworkOrchestrator.prepareElement(NetworkOrchestrator.java:1380)

Re: VM Snapshots

2016-12-01 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Yes




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (From €2.50)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (From €5.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (From €10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (From €20.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (From €40.00)


On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Mohd Zainal Abidin Rabani <
zai...@nocser.net> wrote:

> Which place it will store? In secondary storage?
>
>
> On 12/2/2016 3:43 PM, Mindaugas Milinavičius wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Storage > Snapshots
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Pagarbiai
>> Mindaugas Milinavičius
>> UAB STARNITA
>> Direktorius
>> http://www.clustspace.com
>> LT: +37068882880
>> RU: +7913933
>>
>> Tomorrow's possibilities today
>> <http://www.clustspace.com/>
>>
>> - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (From €2.50)
>> - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (From €5.00)
>> - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (From €10.00)
>> - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (From €20.00)
>> - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (From €40.00)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Mohd Zainal Abidin Rabani <
>> zai...@nocser.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm using KVM for cloudstack host. I try to do snapshot from ROOT disk.
>>> Where is snapshots store in UI clodustack?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you need further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mohd Zainal Abidin Rabani
>>> Technical Support
>>>
>>> ModernOne Data Solutions Sdn. Bhd.
>>> [ Dedicated Server | VPS | Co-Location | Hosting ]
>>> [ Managed Service | System Integration | Domain ]
>>> W : www.nocser.net
>>> FB: http://www.facebook.com/nocser
>>> Twitter: @nocsertech
>>> Gtalk: zainal@gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
> --
> If you need further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.
>
> Regards,
> Mohd Zainal Abidin Rabani
> Technical Support
>
> ModernOne Data Solutions Sdn. Bhd.
> [ Dedicated Server | VPS | Co-Location | Hosting ]
> [ Managed Service | System Integration | Domain ]
> W : www.nocser.net
> FB: http://www.facebook.com/nocser
> Twitter: @nocsertech
> Gtalk: zainal@gmail.com
>
>

Re: VM Snapshots

2016-12-01 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hey,

Storage > Snapshots




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (From €2.50)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (From €5.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (From €10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (From €20.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (From €40.00)


On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Mohd Zainal Abidin Rabani <
zai...@nocser.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm using KVM for cloudstack host. I try to do snapshot from ROOT disk.
> Where is snapshots store in UI clodustack?
>
>
> --
> If you need further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.
>
> Regards,
> Mohd Zainal Abidin Rabani
> Technical Support
>
> ModernOne Data Solutions Sdn. Bhd.
> [ Dedicated Server | VPS | Co-Location | Hosting ]
> [ Managed Service | System Integration | Domain ]
> W : www.nocser.net
> FB: http://www.facebook.com/nocser
> Twitter: @nocsertech
> Gtalk: zainal@gmail.com
>
>

Re: Disconnected XenServer 6.5 Master server

2016-11-22 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

pool master and slaves all is ok. Master new server, and slaves working
with new master. There is perfect.

xe pool-ha-disable
The operation could not be performed because HA is not enabled on the Pool

I restarted cloudstack-management service, but anyway, VM's showing online
and can't be restarted or migrated to another host

2016-11-22 17:20:53,501 WARN  [o.a.c.a.c.a.v.MigrateVMCmd]
(API-Job-Executor-2:ctx-fe868303 job-3755 ctx-4e021994) (logid:97c86433)
Exception:
com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:3] is
unreachable: Host 3: Host with specified id is not in the right state: Alert
at
com.cloud.agent.manager.ClusteredAgentManagerImpl.getAttache(ClusteredAgentManagerImpl.java:568)
at
com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl.send(AgentManagerImpl.java:446)
at
com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl.send(AgentManagerImpl.java:360)







Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (From €2.50)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (From €5.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (From €10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (From €20.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (From €40.00)


On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> I would first of all check your new master thoroughly with the below
> commands, then check your XS slaves - do a “more /etc/xensource/pool.conf”
> on all of them to check that they all agree point to the new poolmaster (in
> fact carry this step out on the new master as well). If not you may have to
> do a “xe pool-recover-slaves”. There may be other steps required as well –
> you may have to disable HA temporarily (xe pool-ha-disable) + do some
> xe-toolstack-restarts.
>
> Once you are fully happy the XenServer cluster is healthy you might have
> to restart your cloudstack-management service.
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> On 22/11/2016, 14:51, "uabstarn...@gmail.com on behalf of Mindaugas
> Milinavičius" <uabstarn...@gmail.com on behalf of mindau...@clustspace.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> i did xe pool-emergency-transition-to-master and other server started
> and
> connected.
>
> But my master server is not bootable at the moment, and i can't
> stop/restart or migrate instance to another host, because on cloudstack
> still showing old server like masterHow to change master at
> cloudstack
> to the new one?
>
>
>
>
> Pagarbiai
> Mindaugas Milinavičius
> UAB STARNITA
> Direktorius
> http://www.clustspace.com
> LT: +37068882880
> RU: +7913933
>
> Tomorrow's possibilities today
> <http://www.clustspace.com/>
>
>- 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (From €2.50)
>- 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (From €5.00)
>- 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (From €10.00)
>- 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (From €20.00)
>- 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (From €40.00)
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Dag Sonstebo <
> dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Are the other XS hosts showing as healthy in CloudStack? This can
> > sometimes be a XenServer issue – where a new poolmaster isn’t
> assigned
> > properly.
> >
> > Check the current state of your cluster (“xe host-list / xe
> pool-list /
> > more /etc/xensource/pool.conf”) + if it’s not healthy you may need
> to do a
> > “xe pool-designate-new-master” (or worst case “xe
> > pool-emergency-transition-to-master”).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dag Sonstebo
> > Cloud Architect
> > ShapeBlue
> >
> > On 22/11/2016, 14:36, "uabstarn...@gmail.com on behalf of Mindaugas
> > Milinavičius" <uabstarn...@gmail.com on behalf of
> mindau...@clustspace.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >     Hello,
> >
> > Master server got disconnect (problem with HDD's) and now, can't
> > stop/restart some of VM's.
> >
> > There is enabled HA, but they are not restarting on another
> server.
> >
> > Anyone have idea, how to do it manually?
> >
> >
> >
> > Pagarbiai
> > Mindaugas Milinavičius
> > UAB STARNITA
> > Direktorius
> > http://www.clustspace.com
> > LT: +37068882880
> > RU: +7913933
> >
> > Tomorrow's possibilities today
> > <http:

Re: Disconnected XenServer 6.5 Master server

2016-11-22 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

i did xe pool-emergency-transition-to-master and other server started and
connected.

But my master server is not bootable at the moment, and i can't
stop/restart or migrate instance to another host, because on cloudstack
still showing old server like masterHow to change master at cloudstack
to the new one?




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (From €2.50)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (From €5.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (From €10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (From €20.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (From €40.00)


On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> Are the other XS hosts showing as healthy in CloudStack? This can
> sometimes be a XenServer issue – where a new poolmaster isn’t assigned
> properly.
>
> Check the current state of your cluster (“xe host-list / xe pool-list /
> more /etc/xensource/pool.conf”) + if it’s not healthy you may need to do a
> “xe pool-designate-new-master” (or worst case “xe
> pool-emergency-transition-to-master”).
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> On 22/11/2016, 14:36, "uabstarn...@gmail.com on behalf of Mindaugas
> Milinavičius" <uabstarn...@gmail.com on behalf of mindau...@clustspace.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Master server got disconnect (problem with HDD's) and now, can't
> stop/restart some of VM's.
>
> There is enabled HA, but they are not restarting on another server.
>
> Anyone have idea, how to do it manually?
>
>
>
> Pagarbiai
> Mindaugas Milinavičius
> UAB STARNITA
> Direktorius
> http://www.clustspace.com
> LT: +37068882880
> RU: +7913933
>
> Tomorrow's possibilities today
> <http://www.clustspace.com/>
>
>- 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (From €2.50)
>- 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (From €5.00)
>- 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (From €10.00)
>- 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (From €20.00)
>- 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (From €40.00)
>
>
>
> dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Disconnected XenServer 6.5 Master server

2016-11-22 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

Master server got disconnect (problem with HDD's) and now, can't
stop/restart some of VM's.

There is enabled HA, but they are not restarting on another server.

Anyone have idea, how to do it manually?



Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (From €2.50)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (From €5.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (From €10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (From €20.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (From €40.00)

Re: Restarting virtual router after 2-3min online

2016-10-26 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

I just restart cloudstack-management and all start working fine.




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)


On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote:

> Can you provide more information about your environment? What type of
> hypervisors?
>
>
> 
> From: uabstarn...@gmail.com <uabstarn...@gmail.com> on behalf of
> Mindaugas Milinavicius <mindau...@clustspace.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 6:49 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Restarting virtual router after 2-3min online
>
> Hello,
>
> i tryed to restart onlye 1 server, but have no idea why, but restarted all
> pool servers, after it, console and storage VM's started without any
> problem, but virtual router can't start. He is started, but after 2-3mins
> restarting.
>
>
>

Restarting virtual router after 2-3min online

2016-10-26 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

i tryed to restart onlye 1 server, but have no idea why, but restarted all
pool servers, after it, console and storage VM's started without any
problem, but virtual router can't start. He is started, but after 2-3mins
restarting.

Re: Hello, stopped VM still working

2016-10-26 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

in ACS - stopped, in XenCenter - also stopped. Ping still going, website
working. But client can't connect with FTP and not working e-mails.






Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)


On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> Hi Mindaugas,
>
> Can you elaborate? If the VM is showing as stopped in ACS as well as
> stopped in XenCenter this is fairly conclusive. Are you saying there is a
> website hosted on this VM – and it is still showing as up even though the
> webserver VM seems down?
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
>
> On 26/10/2016, 11:17, "uabstarn...@gmail.com on behalf of Mindaugas
> Milinavičius" <uabstarn...@gmail.com on behalf of mindau...@clustspace.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> guys, maybe anyone know issue what can be.
>
> ACS 4.8
> Storage: ScaleIO (Preorder)
> Hyper: Xen
>
> We have one VM which is stoped in ACS, in XenCenter showing, that he is
> also stoped.
> I tryed to check SMlog, but unfortunaly.
>
> IP and website is working - as i understand, VM's is not
> stopped.anyone
> have idea what to check?
>
>
>
> dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Hello, stopped VM still working

2016-10-26 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

guys, maybe anyone know issue what can be.

ACS 4.8
Storage: ScaleIO (Preorder)
Hyper: Xen

We have one VM which is stoped in ACS, in XenCenter showing, that he is
also stoped.
I tryed to check SMlog, but unfortunaly.

IP and website is working - as i understand, VM's is not stopped.anyone
have idea what to check?

IPv6

2016-09-20 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

anyone know then issue with IPv6 CIDR will be fixed? It taking too long...



Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)

ACS 4.9 in production

2016-09-10 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello guys,

does anyone use 4.9 in production?

Is it stable?

Re: Virtual Router nameserver change

2016-09-06 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

The same info in internal and DNS
Internal DNS 1 8.8.8.8
Internal DNS 2 8.8.4.4




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)


On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote:

> As Anil indicated, the values are set by the zone level DNS entries. What
> have you got setup in those?
>
>
> Also, check what you have listed in your internal DNS, as ACS will place a
> static route in a VR for that internal entry to force the traffic out the
> private interface.
>
>
> - Si
>
> 
> From: uabstarn...@gmail.com <uabstarn...@gmail.com> on behalf of
> Mindaugas Milinavicius <mindau...@clustspace.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 9:15 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Virtual Router nameserver change
>
> Anyone have idea, where i can change it? How to delete mine NS'es:)
>
>
>
>
> Pagarbiai
> Mindaugas Milinavicius
> UAB STARNITA
> Direktorius
> http://www.clustspace.com
> LT: +37068882880
> RU: +7913933
>
> Tomorrow's possibilities today
> <http://www.clustspace.com/>
>
>- 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (EUR 5.00)
>- 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (EUR 10.00)
>- 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (EUR 20.00)
>- 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (EUR 40.00)
>- 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (EUR 80.00)
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Mindaugas Milinavicius <
> mindau...@clustspace.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > ACS 4.7.1
> >
> > I tryed to change /etc/dnsmasq.d/cloud.conf but after creating new VM -
> > they are putting again mine IP.
> >
>

Re: Virtual Router nameserver change

2016-09-06 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Anyone have idea, where i can change it? How to delete mine NS'es:)




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)


On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Mindaugas Milinavičius <
mindau...@clustspace.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> ACS 4.7.1
>
> I tryed to change /etc/dnsmasq.d/cloud.conf but after creating new VM -
> they are putting again mine IP.
>

Virtual Router nameserver change

2016-09-04 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

I have one problem with virtual router and nameserver.

After creating new instance i have 3 nameservers in /etc/resolv.conf file

nameserver mine_ip
nameserver public_ip
nameserver public_ip

Is it possible to change places like:

nameserver public_ip
nameserver public_ip
nameserver mine_ip

or just delete mine nameserver ip?

If nameserver first with mine ip addresses, then internet speed
dramatically goes down by 10-20 times or even more.

If i put mine nameserver manually into last place - speed is back to
normal...

Re: IPv6

2016-09-01 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

i will integrate ipv6 in next week




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)


On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote:

> Marty,
>
>
> I know some folks in Europe are using v6, but I'm not sure to what degree.
> We haven't started looking at it yet, but we will at some point.
>
>
> - Si
>
> 
> From: Marty Godsey <ma...@gonsource.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 2:48 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: IPv6
>
> So.. The subject says it all.. :) to a degree.
>
> Has anyone used/using IPv6 in Cloudstack and based on the support docs, It
> has to be a /64? I can subnet to say a /109?
>
> Regards,
> Marty Godsey
>
>

Re: reseting password

2016-08-31 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

No, if i reboot VM - all is ok, there is old password.

If host, there VM is started, crashed, after VM's started on other host,
they have new password.




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)


On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Kirk Kosinski <kirk.kosin...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> Hi, do you mean the VM Instance reboots when you change the password
> through CloudStack?  That is expected.  The password is reset by a script
> that run at boot time so the VM has to be rebooted for the new password to
> take effect.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> kirk.kosin...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HS
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: uabstarn...@gmail.com [mailto:uabstarn...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Mindaugas Milinavicius
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 12:31 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: reseting password
>
> Hello guys,
>
> then host server goes down, always after back changed VM's passwords. Does
> anyone know why it's doing it? I should everytime stop instance, change
> password, and after it back
>

reseting password

2016-08-31 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello guys,

then host server goes down, always after back changed VM's passwords. Does
anyone know why it's doing it? I should everytime stop instance, change
password, and after it back

Re: Reconnect secondary storage NFS

2016-08-29 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Looks like fixed, strange story, but only after reconfigure eth port in
management server, i get it up.

Re: Reconnect secondary storage NFS

2016-08-29 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Yes, did not helped.

Re: Reconnect secondary storage NFS

2016-08-29 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Yes, i can ping, and i see mounted storage on managemed server:)

Problem is SSVM is disconnected from secondary storage, reboot didnot
helped, i tryed to destroy and now have no idea how to run it again:)) It's
not starting up manually:)

Reconnect secondary storage NFS

2016-08-29 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

Today, server, where is secondary storage, was turned off for 10min. After
it come back, cloudstack can't see secondary storage with templates and ISO
files.

Tryed to search how to reconnect - but did not found anything.

Any solution?

Virtualization: Xen
Secondary Storage: NFS

Re: Windows instance high CPU load

2016-08-28 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Thank you!

I installed all drivers and looks like is ok now. Downloading more then
500Mbps and load is ±50%:)




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)


On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote:

> What hypervisor are you using?
>
> Make sure you have the paravirtualized drivers installed and pick Windows
> PV as the template OS type.
>
> - Si
>
> Simon Weller/ENA
> (615) 312-6068
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mindaugas Milinavičius [mindau...@clustspace.com]
> Received: Sunday, 28 Aug 2016, 8:51AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
> Subject: Windows instance high CPU load
>
> Hello,
>
> does anyone have problem with Windows instance and high CPU load?
>
> I tryed with 1core and 4 cores - problem the same, if i starting to
> downloading any files, CPU load is going crazy and always 100% of use.
>
> Also, i checked movies - also CPU load ±70%
>
> CPU: E5-2630v4
> 4GB RAM
>

Re: Windows instance high CPU load

2016-08-28 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

I'm using xenserver 6.5 with all updates.




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)


On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote:

> What hypervisor are you using?
>
> Make sure you have the paravirtualized drivers installed and pick Windows
> PV as the template OS type.
>
> - Si
>
> Simon Weller/ENA
> (615) 312-6068
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mindaugas Milinavičius [mindau...@clustspace.com]
> Received: Sunday, 28 Aug 2016, 8:51AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
> Subject: Windows instance high CPU load
>
> Hello,
>
> does anyone have problem with Windows instance and high CPU load?
>
> I tryed with 1core and 4 cores - problem the same, if i starting to
> downloading any files, CPU load is going crazy and always 100% of use.
>
> Also, i checked movies - also CPU load ±70%
>
> CPU: E5-2630v4
> 4GB RAM
>

Re: Debian 8.5 template

2016-08-22 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

sorry for long delay - looks like it's working. i delete key and key.pub
files.

Thank you!




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)


On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Stephan Seitz <
s.se...@secretresearchfacility.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> you should remove /etc/ssh/*{_key,_key.pub} as one of the final steps
> of template creation.
> I'm currently not sure if debian's openssh-server init automatically
> regenerates the server keys. If not a (to be written) "first-boot' init
> should call dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server to get the keys
> regenerated.
>
> Anyway, some housekeeping tasks (like removing .bash_history,
> /var/log/* ...) should be done anyway during template creation.
>
> Here's what we do after template creation/update:
>
> https://github.com/HeinleinSupport/acs-template-scripts/blob/master/deb
> ian8/root/newtemplate.sh
>
>
>
> Am Sonntag, den 14.08.2016, 22:40 +0300 schrieb Mindaugas Milinavičius:
> > Hello,
> >
> > does anyone create template for Debian 8.5?
> >
> > I can create, but after server is booted, do not working SSH becau
> > se of
> > invalid rsa key.
> >
> > Hostname changed, password also changed.
> >
> > The solution is onlye to reinstall openssh-server to get started, but
> > how
> > to do it on boot from template?
> >
> > Does anyone have solution?
>

Debian 8.5 template

2016-08-14 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

does anyone create template for Debian 8.5?

I can create, but after server is booted, do not working SSH because of
invalid rsa key.

Hostname changed, password also changed.

The solution is onlye to reinstall openssh-server to get started, but how
to do it on boot from template?

Does anyone have solution?

Re: Primary storage calculation

2016-08-13 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Yes, thats true, but ridiculous is then you have ~500 templates with
20-160GB of space, and use primary storage ~10TB then you start thinking -
should i really use xen:)




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)
   - 8 core CPU, 16GB RAM, 160GB (€ 160.00)


On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Makrand <makrandsa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> While creating VM, a VM template will be copied from secondary to primary
> for first time. I guess it remains on primary for subsequent launches of
> similar VMs.  
>
> --
> Best,
> Makrand
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Mindaugas Milinavičius <
> mindau...@clustspace.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > vdi is showing correctly, i tested today templates, and here is a
> problem.
> >
> > If i run instance from ISO - space taked normaly, if i run instance from
> > templates - space taking double (creating instance 20gb, primary storage
> > take 40gb, after deleting instance - only 20gb deleted).
> >
>

Re: Primary storage calculation

2016-08-12 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

vdi is showing correctly, i tested today templates, and here is a problem.

If i run instance from ISO - space taked normaly, if i run instance from
templates - space taking double (creating instance 20gb, primary storage
take 40gb, after deleting instance - only 20gb deleted).

Re: Primary storage calculation

2016-08-11 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hi Stephan,

i tryed it a lot of time. At SMlog, lvs, pvs,vgs is fine.

vhd-util scan -f -m "VHD-*" -l
VG_XenStorage-b32a37ca-00a2-0212-8036-5664079043e0 -p
vhd=VHD-e960d09c-449b-448d-888e-e749b7e8b2b5 capacity=3145728000
size=3158310912 hidden=1 parent=none
   vhd=VHD-0bff8b17-46f2-4d9e-8f65-0b1dc43f9436 capacity=3145728000
size=3158310912 hidden=0 parent=VHD-e960d09c-449b-448d-888e-e749b7e8b2b5
   vhd=VHD-9ba7bbfb-06d7-4594-ac73-488eb637a404 capacity=3145728000
size=3158310912 hidden=0 parent=VHD-e960d09c-449b-448d-888e-e749b7e8b2b5
   vhd=VHD-ef0d8695-5a08-4368-8b6d-52a3c47ec2cd capacity=3145728000
size=3158310912 hidden=0 parent=VHD-e960d09c-449b-448d-888e-e749b7e8b2b5
vhd=VHD-1580754c-f516-4211-930a-0f822997bf11 capacity=42949672960
size=43041947648 hidden=0 parent=none


I delete storage, added like new one. Create new instance and.double
space :) Delete instance - deleted only 40GB of space, where is another
40GB - have no idea:)




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)
   - 8 core CPU, 16GB RAM, 160GB (€ 160.00)


On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Stephan Seitz <
s.se...@secretresearchfacility.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> since your lvm shows duplicate pv's I assume the filter in your
> lvm.conf isn't set correct.
> This could also explain the listing of (xenserver unrelated)
> vg_srv1/lv_* due to nested lvm.
>
> btw. I'ld rather use something like
> vhd-util scan -f -m "VHD-*" -l VG_XenStorage-3e26eaad-befd-fb47-82ad-
> b8f2bec1378e -p
> to get a proper view on your vhd-lv's.
>
> - Stephan
>
> Am Dienstag, den 09.08.2016, 21:43 +0300 schrieb Mindaugas
> Milinavičius:
> > 56G
> > 50G and 4G - have no idea what is it...
> >
> >
> > # lvs
> >   Found duplicate PV aVgL0a29JUALu5j3MJZb5iFHRKQhOJi0: using
> > /dev/sdi3 not
> > /dev/sdb3
> >   LV   VG
> >   Attr   LSize  Origin Snap%  Move Log Copy%  Convert
> >   MGT
> >  VG_XenStorage-3e26eaad-befd-fb47-82ad-b8f2bec1378e -wi-a-  4.00M
> >   VHD-0b4dab04-4b0b-4fbb-a847-5818a9b28e66
> > VG_XenStorage-3e26eaad-befd-fb47-82ad-b8f2bec1378e -ri-ao  2.94G
> >   VHD-337c4cac-8027-4dfa-8739-f1846ba2dc24
> > VG_XenStorage-3e26eaad-befd-fb47-82ad-b8f2bec1378e -wi---  2.94G
> >   VHD-6fecae1a-cbbf-4e20-8201-de634e2a2be4
> > VG_XenStorage-3e26eaad-befd-fb47-82ad-b8f2bec1378e -wi---  2.94G
> >   VHD-756e318f-a958-45d5-9837-46b0c91b4293
> > VG_XenStorage-3e26eaad-befd-fb47-82ad-b8f2bec1378e -wi-ao  2.94G
> >   hb-0a0de3c4-e181-4424-af7c-798ebd38269b
> >  VG_XenStorage-3e26eaad-befd-fb47-82ad-b8f2bec1378e -wi---  4.00M
> >   hb-8940634c-1203-44da-bb9b-73193f160eb7
> >  VG_XenStorage-3e26eaad-befd-fb47-82ad-b8f2bec1378e -wi---  4.00M
> >   hb-d5929bfd-bae8-4ed0-bc1e-6e7f5a1987b7
> >  VG_XenStorage-3e26eaad-befd-fb47-82ad-b8f2bec1378e -wi-a-  4.00M
> >   lv_home  vg_srv1
> >    -wi--- 56.14G
> >   lv_root  vg_srv1
> >-wi--- 50.00G
> >   lv_swap  vg_srv1
> >-wi---  4.00G
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Pagarbiai
> > Mindaugas Milinavičius
> > UAB STARNITA
> > Direktorius
> > http://www.clustspace.com
> > LT: +37068882880
> > RU: +7913933
> >
> > Tomorrow's possibilities today
> > <http://www.clustspace.com/>
> >
> >- 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
> >- 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
> >- 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
> >- 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
> >- 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)
> >- 8 core CPU, 16GB RAM, 160GB (€ 160.00)
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Makrand <makrandsa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I've learned few facts about XENserver in last couple of days.
> > >
> > > e.g. On XENserver, when you take snapshot, XENserver will create a
> > > 2 VDI
> > > (Base VDI+place holder for snapshot) file on same primary storage
> > > (SR in
> > > XENserver terms) as disk is. You will offcouse have a vhd file
> > > saved on
> > > seconday storage. Here is funny part, when you delete snapshot from
> > > cloudstack, XENserv

Re: Facelift for End-User GUI of Apache Cloud Stack?

2016-08-11 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

You can customise your site and include all API funckions:)




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)
   - 8 core CPU, 16GB RAM, 160GB (€ 160.00)


2016-08-11 12:01 GMT+03:00 Alessandro Caviglione <c.alessan...@gmail.com>:

> +1
>
>
> Da: Mateo Meier, Artmotion

Re: Primary storage calculation

2016-08-10 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Any ideas?

Re: Primary storage calculation

2016-08-09 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

version of cloudstack 4.7.1
Type: xenserver
primary storage - scaleio with lvmohba (presetup).

I think, it can be with expunge time, because it was set to 24h after
expunge the VM.

Primary storage calculation

2016-08-09 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

does anyone have idea, why it's showing much more used space.

There is no volumes, snapshots, VM's and so on. Clear servers. Just
creating templates which ofcourse saved into secondary storage:)

Re: Overprovising CPU with XenServer 6.5SP1

2016-08-08 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

0z file showing 1 server, with dual CPU, which have total of 63,96GHz. It's
overprovised 3x. And total is 191,88GHz
3s file showing 3 servers, with dual CPU which have total of 264GHz. It's
overprovised 3x. and total is the same - 264GHz.

The different is only 1 - with 191GHz - KVM hypervisor, the next one is
with xenserver.




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)
   - 8 core CPU, 16GB RAM, 160GB (€ 160.00)


On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Stephan Seitz <
s.se...@secretresearchfacility.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> cpu overprovision factor is only recalculated for vms started *after*
> the factor has been changed.
> The more vms you're going to stop/start, the more accurate your
> calculation is getting.
>
> Please refer to http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-a
> dministration/en/4.8/hosts.html#over-provisioning-and-service-offering-
> limits
>
> cheers,
>
> - Stephan
>
>
> Am Montag, den 08.08.2016, 15:22 +0300 schrieb Mindaugas Milinavičius:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does anyone did overprovising with CPU and Xen? I tryed to change in
> > global
> > settings, but in dashboard anyway shoing like 1:1...
> >
> >
> >
> > Pagarbiai
> > Mindaugas Milinavičius
> > UAB STARNITA
> > Direktorius
> > http://www.clustspace.com
> > LT: +37068882880
> > RU: +7913933
> >
> > Tomorrow's possibilities today
> > <http://www.clustspace.com/>
> >
> >- 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
> >- 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
> >- 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
> >- 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
> >- 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)
> >- 8 core CPU, 16GB RAM, 160GB (€ 160.00)
>

Overprovising CPU with XenServer 6.5SP1

2016-08-08 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

Does anyone did overprovising with CPU and Xen? I tryed to change in global
settings, but in dashboard anyway shoing like 1:1...



Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)
   - 8 core CPU, 16GB RAM, 160GB (€ 160.00)

Re: ACS+Scaleio like primary storage

2016-08-02 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

Did not helped - the same errors.

I tryed to reconfigure zone - did not helped too.




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)
   - 8 core CPU, 16GB RAM, 160GB (€ 160.00)


On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Glenn Wagner <glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> Hi
>
> Thanks for the logs ,
> Looking at the error Unable to acquire lock on VMTemplateStoragePool: 35
> There has been some cases in the past  where restarting the management
> server can solve that issue
>
> Regards
> Glenn
>
>
> glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> First Floor, Victoria Centre, 7 Victoria Street, Somerset West, Cape Town
> 7129South Africa
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: uabstarn...@gmail.com [mailto:uabstarn...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Mindaugas Milinavicius
> Sent: Tuesday, 02 August 2016 9:24 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ACS+Scaleio like primary storage
>
> Hello,
>
> Hypervisors XenServer 6.5SP1 with all updates Storage EMC ScaleIO Primary
> storage PreSetup Network - advanced
>
> SMlog: http://pastebin.com/pHXCZye5
>
> ]# xe sr-list shared=true
> uuid ( RO): 7fdb8505-cfef-4d30-84db-c458af09bc68
>   name-label ( RW): SR-SCALEIO
> name-description ( RW):
> host ( RO): 
> type ( RO): lvmohba
> content-type ( RO): ScaleIO
>
>
> ]# xe host-list
> uuid ( RO): 0a0de3c4-e181-4424-af7c-798ebd38269b
>   name-label ( RW): srv0-1-2.cloud
> name-description ( RW): Default install of XenServer
>
>
> uuid ( RO): 8940634c-1203-44da-bb9b-73193f160eb7
>   name-label ( RW): srv0-1-3.cloud
> name-description ( RW): Default install of XenServer
>
>
> uuid ( RO): d5929bfd-bae8-4ed0-bc1e-6e7f5a1987b7
>   name-label ( RW): srv0-1-1.cloud
> name-description ( RW): Default install of XenServer
>
>
> I can create VM via XenCenter, but can't start after adding new zones
> SSVM's.
>
> Log from cloudstack management-server.log http://pastebin.com/ArafHtmQ
>
>
>
>
> Pagarbiai
> Mindaugas Milinavičius
> UAB STARNITA
> Direktorius
> http://www.clustspace.com
> LT: +37068882880
> RU: +7913933
>
> Tomorrow's possibilities today
> <http://www.clustspace.com/>
>
>- 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
>- 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
>- 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
>- 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
>- 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)
>- 8 core CPU, 16GB RAM, 160GB (€ 160.00)
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Glenn Wagner <glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Good morning ,
> >
> > Could you give us a better understanding of your environment (your
> > setup)
> >
> > My thoughts:
> >
> > Hypervisors (XenServer) 6.2 or 6.5
> > Storage (EMC Scaleio)
> > Primary Storage protocol with Cloudstack (NFS, PreSetup, ISCSI etc)
> > Network Type (Basic, Advanced)
> >
> > Can you upload both your SMLog and Management Server logs to Pastebin?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Glenn
> >
> >
> >
> > glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > First Floor, Victoria Centre, 7 Victoria Street, Somerset West, Cape
> > Town 7129South Africa @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: uabstarn...@gmail.com [mailto:uabstarn...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> > Of Mindaugas Milinavicius
> > Sent: Monday, 01 August 2016 8:50 PM
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: ACS+Scaleio like primary storage
> >
> > Hello to everyone,
> >
> > At first, want to say thank you to Marcelo Lima for helping to run
> > ScaleIO and XenServer, also Felipe for good information in
> > powerpoint:)
> >
> >
> > I have a problem with primary storage.
> >
> > Tryed yesterday added new zone, which configured with ScaleIO+XenServer.
> >
> > At the first time, i thought problem with configuration in our system,
> > but later, i debug creating SSVM and found problem with storage.
> >
> > Jul 31 21:58:01 srv0-1-1 SM: [2468] LVHDSR.scan for
> > ebf265da-18b7-7258-425f-a33ae23b11a3
> > Jul 31 21:58:01 srv0-1-1 SM: [2468] * Error in
> >
> >
> scsiutil.refresh_lun_size_by_SCSIid(emc-vol-6955b3dd0edb1105-d3473ceb):
> > EXCEPTION exceptions.OSError, [Errno 2] *No such file or directory:
> > '/dev/disk/by-scsid/emc-vol-6955b3dd0edb1105-d3473ceb'*
> >
> > Checked /var/log/SMLog - the same error.
> >
> > I tryed to create VM via XenCenter - all is nice, VM created and running.
> > Can see storage.
> >
> > Anyone have idea, what can be wrong?
> >
>

Re: ACS+Scaleio like primary storage

2016-08-02 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

Hypervisors XenServer 6.5SP1 with all updates
Storage EMC ScaleIO
Primary storage PreSetup
Network - advanced

SMlog: http://pastebin.com/pHXCZye5

]# xe sr-list shared=true
uuid ( RO): 7fdb8505-cfef-4d30-84db-c458af09bc68
  name-label ( RW): SR-SCALEIO
name-description ( RW):
host ( RO): 
type ( RO): lvmohba
content-type ( RO): ScaleIO


]# xe host-list
uuid ( RO): 0a0de3c4-e181-4424-af7c-798ebd38269b
  name-label ( RW): srv0-1-2.cloud
name-description ( RW): Default install of XenServer


uuid ( RO): 8940634c-1203-44da-bb9b-73193f160eb7
  name-label ( RW): srv0-1-3.cloud
name-description ( RW): Default install of XenServer


uuid ( RO): d5929bfd-bae8-4ed0-bc1e-6e7f5a1987b7
  name-label ( RW): srv0-1-1.cloud
name-description ( RW): Default install of XenServer


I can create VM via XenCenter, but can't start after adding new zones
SSVM's.

Log from cloudstack management-server.log http://pastebin.com/ArafHtmQ




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)
   - 8 core CPU, 16GB RAM, 160GB (€ 160.00)


On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Glenn Wagner <glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> Good morning ,
>
> Could you give us a better understanding of your environment (your setup)
>
> My thoughts:
>
> Hypervisors (XenServer) 6.2 or 6.5
> Storage (EMC Scaleio)
> Primary Storage protocol with Cloudstack (NFS, PreSetup, ISCSI etc)
> Network Type (Basic, Advanced)
>
> Can you upload both your SMLog and Management Server logs to Pastebin?
>
> Thanks
> Glenn
>
>
>
> glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> First Floor, Victoria Centre, 7 Victoria Street, Somerset West, Cape Town
> 7129South Africa
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: uabstarn...@gmail.com [mailto:uabstarn...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Mindaugas Milinavicius
> Sent: Monday, 01 August 2016 8:50 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: ACS+Scaleio like primary storage
>
> Hello to everyone,
>
> At first, want to say thank you to Marcelo Lima for helping to run ScaleIO
> and XenServer, also Felipe for good information in powerpoint:)
>
>
> I have a problem with primary storage.
>
> Tryed yesterday added new zone, which configured with ScaleIO+XenServer.
>
> At the first time, i thought problem with configuration in our system, but
> later, i debug creating SSVM and found problem with storage.
>
> Jul 31 21:58:01 srv0-1-1 SM: [2468] LVHDSR.scan for
> ebf265da-18b7-7258-425f-a33ae23b11a3
> Jul 31 21:58:01 srv0-1-1 SM: [2468] * Error in
>
> scsiutil.refresh_lun_size_by_SCSIid(emc-vol-6955b3dd0edb1105-d3473ceb):
> EXCEPTION exceptions.OSError, [Errno 2] *No such file or directory:
> '/dev/disk/by-scsid/emc-vol-6955b3dd0edb1105-d3473ceb'*
>
> Checked /var/log/SMLog - the same error.
>
> I tryed to create VM via XenCenter - all is nice, VM created and running.
> Can see storage.
>
> Anyone have idea, what can be wrong?
>

ACS+Scaleio like primary storage

2016-08-01 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello to everyone,

At first, want to say thank you to Marcelo Lima for helping to run ScaleIO
and XenServer, also Felipe for good information in powerpoint:)


I have a problem with primary storage.

Tryed yesterday added new zone, which configured with ScaleIO+XenServer.

At the first time, i thought problem with configuration in our system, but
later, i debug creating SSVM and found problem with storage.

Jul 31 21:58:01 srv0-1-1 SM: [2468] LVHDSR.scan for
ebf265da-18b7-7258-425f-a33ae23b11a3
Jul 31 21:58:01 srv0-1-1 SM: [2468] * Error in
scsiutil.refresh_lun_size_by_SCSIid(emc-vol-6955b3dd0edb1105-d3473ceb):
EXCEPTION exceptions.OSError, [Errno 2] *No such file or directory:
'/dev/disk/by-scsid/emc-vol-6955b3dd0edb1105-d3473ceb'*

Checked /var/log/SMLog - the same error.

I tryed to create VM via XenCenter - all is nice, VM created and running.
Can see storage.

Anyone have idea, what can be wrong?

ScaleIO + ACS + HA

2016-07-13 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

does anyone have solution for ScaleIO and ACS high availability?

As we understanding, we can create volume ant map only on 1 server. If this
server goes down - problem with storage will be for all hosts...

How do we do it:

Creating domain > adding SDS > Creating volume > mapping on the server and
creating NFS > Adding to ACS primary storage.

Any solution?

Re: Storage Performance

2016-06-05 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Он спрашивают: XEN, KVM, HyperV, VMWARE или что




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +7913933

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 core CPU, 512MB RAM, 20GB (€ 5.00)
   - 1 core CPU, 1GB RAM, 30GB (€ 10.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 2GB RAM, 40GB (€ 20.00)
   - 2 core CPU, 4GB RAM, 60GB (€ 40.00)
   - 4 core CPU, 8GB RAM, 80GB (€ 80.00)
   - 8 core CPU, 16GB RAM, 160GB (€ 160.00)


On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Vladimir Melnik <v.mel...@uplink.ua> wrote:

> I use CentOS-6.8 as the operating system of a host.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 07:05:30PM +0200, Timothy Lothering wrote:
> > Hi Vladimir,
> >
> > What hypervisor are you using?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Vladimir Melnik [mailto:v.mel...@uplink.ua]
> > Sent: Sunday, 05 June 2016 6:06 PM
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Storage Performance
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have an ACS-driven environment with a storage subsystem which is built
> on
> > Gluster over InfiniBand. The storage shows pretty good performance when I
> > mount a volume on a host and run a simple test ("dd if=/dev/zero
> > of=/mnt/tmp/test.1G bs=1G count=1 conv=fdatasync"), it shows about 400
> MB/s
> > and that's okay. But when I deploy a virtual machine (I tried it with
> > CentOS-6.8-x64 as a guest OS), I can't gain so good result from inside
> of a
> > guest (it shows about 40 MB/s with the same simple test).
> >
> > What do you think, have I forgotten to do something important when I was
> > seting this environment up?
> >
> > Thank you very much for sharing your ideas and clues!
> >
> > --
> > V.Melnik
> >
>
> --
> V.Melnik
>

CloudStack and ScaleIO

2016-05-04 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

does anyone using CS with ScaleIO?

If you using:

1. Storage and VM's on the same servers or differents?
2. Do you use sdc and sds on the same server or differents? SDS:SDC 1:1 or
1:*?
3. Is it any problem with KVM?



Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +79651806396

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 Core, 512MB RAM, 20GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 11EUR
   - 1 Core, 1024MB RAM, 30GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 18,7EUR
   - 2 Cores, 2048MB RAM, 40GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 27,5EUR
   - 4 Cores, 4096MB RAM, 100GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 46EUR

Re: VM per HOST?

2016-04-13 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Very big thanks for Timothy:)

And left last choice

E5-2650v4 or E5-2630v4

Price different ±80%, effectivity - ±10% only.

Ofcourse, 2650 have more pCPU/vCPU, but is it worth to pay double price.




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +79651806396

Tomorrow's possibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 Core, 512MB RAM, 20GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 11EUR
   - 1 Core, 1024MB RAM, 30GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 18,7EUR
   - 2 Cores, 2048MB RAM, 40GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 27,5EUR
   - 4 Cores, 4096MB RAM, 100GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 46EUR


On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> Very thorough Tim :)
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Timothy Lothering [mailto:tlother...@datacentrix.co.za]
> Sent: 13 April 2016 09:42
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: VM per HOST?
>
> Hi Mindaugas,
>
> As per previous responses, the trend is to keep to memory as you base
> benchmark for VM density, from personal experience, memory is always the
> limiting factor. vCPUs are rarely a bottleneck for general workloads (there
> are however specific instances where CPUs are the limiting factor). We do
> not use Memory over-provisioning, but do use CPU over-provisioning. We also
> have converged networking and storage connectivity, so the information
> below might vary from your configuration.
>
> These numbers below are a personal opinion and will vary from Provider to
> Provider.
>
> When looking at VM density on a specific host, consider the following:
>
> 1. Recommended pCore to vCore ratios, some hypervisor vendors publish this
> information freely on the web - see VMware Oversubscription best practices
> -
> https://communities.vmware.com/servlet/JiveServlet/previewBody/21181-102-1-28328/vsphere-oversubscription-best-practices%5B1%5D.pdf
> 2. From #1, consider using HT, the hit is between 10-15%, but you
> virtually double your core count, 3. Once an over-subscription value as
> been decided, for example 1:4 (pCore:vCore), then you can guestimate the
> average VM instance resources - we have seen more 4vCPU & 8GB RAM
> instances. Calculate the required memory from this value - i.e you can get
> between 16-30 hosts (per Sockect) using this configuration and need 256GB
> RAM. (you could get even more, but then you need to consider the impact on
> Customer VM instances) 4. With a reference VM count in hand, consider the
> disk IO and throughput, this will determine what will be required from a
> storage throughput aspect.
>
> Looking at the 2x CPU options you have presented,
> http://ark.intel.com/compare/83356,81705, I would personally opt for the
> E5-2630,
>
> 1. Lower RRP
> 2. Lower TDP
> 3. Lower Cooling requirements
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Timothy Lothering
> Timothy Lothering
> Solutions Architect
> Managed Services
>
> T: +27877415535
> F: +27877415100
> C: +27824904099
> E: tlother...@datacentrix.co.za
>
>
> DISCLAIMER NOTICE:
>
> Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official
> business of Datacentrix Holdings Ltd. and its subsidiaries
> ('Datacentrix') is proprietary to Datacentrix. It is confidential, legally
> privileged and protected by law. Datacentrix does not own and endorse any
> other content. Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly
> stated as being that of Datacentrix.
> The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient.
> Please notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you
> and do not read, disclose or use the content in any way. Datacentrix cannot
> assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor
> that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mindaugas Milinavičius [mailto:uabstarn...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 13 April 2016 10:00 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: VM per HOST?
>
> Server/blade is HBA 8Gb FC connectivity with switch. Its more then enough:)
> 13 апр. 2016 г. 10:57 пользователь "Paul Angus" <paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
> написал:
>
> > I'd agree with that. Memory is nearly always the limiting factor when
> > it comes to VMs per

RE: VM per HOST?

2016-04-13 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Server/blade is HBA 8Gb FC connectivity with switch. Its more then enough:)
13 апр. 2016 г. 10:57 пользователь "Paul Angus" <paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
написал:

> I'd agree with that. Memory is nearly always the limiting factor when it
> comes to VMs per host.
>
> -- unless you're talking about blades, and then you have to start looking
> carefully at the connectivity between the chassis and the switch fabric.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
> -Original Message-
> From: uabstarn...@gmail.com [mailto:uabstarn...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Mindaugas Milinavicius
> Sent: 11 April 2016 13:53
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: VM per HOST?
>
> Thank you, i'm thinking something like that too.
>
>
>
>
> Pagarbiai
> Mindaugas Milinavičius
> UAB STARNITA
> Direktorius
> http://www.clustspace.com
> LT: +37068882880
> RU: +79651806396
>
> Tomorrow's posibilities today
> <http://www.clustspace.com/>
>
>- 1 Core, 512MB RAM, 20GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
>Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 11EUR
>- 1 Core, 1024MB RAM, 30GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
>Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 18,7EUR
>- 2 Cores, 2048MB RAM, 40GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
>Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 27,5EUR
>- 4 Cores, 4096MB RAM, 100GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
>Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 46EUR
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Stavros Konstantaras <
> s.konstanta...@uva.nl
> > wrote:
>
> > In our case (general purpose VMs) we decided to have the system's RAM
> > as the reference point to create our VM limit. For example, if the
> > server has 128GBs of RAM and the default VM profile is 1 vCPU + 4Gbs
> > RAM, then our upper limit is roughly 30VMs per server.
> >
> > Over provisioning the CPU is usually not a problem but over
> > provisioning the RAM can be the start of many problems .
> >
> > Kind Regards
> > Stavros
> >
> > 
> > Stavros Konstantaras
> > Science faculty Research IT support (FEIOG) University of Amsterdam,
> > Science Park 904, 1098 XH
> >
> > Fingerprint: E5E5 9B19 D1CD 88CD 4763  3465 A8DC 7C92 330F D59A
> >
> > > On 11 Apr 2016, at 13:09, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Mindaugas Milinavičius <
> > > mindau...@clustspace.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> how many VM's do you creating per host?
> > >> What you prefer E5-2650v3 or E5-2630v3 (less power, 2x cheaper CPU,
> > >> and only ±20% less benchmark)
> > >>
> > >>
> > > I'd say it depends on the workload. For generic purpose VMs CPU is
> > usually
> > > not the bottleneck and personally I'd pick the cheaper one.
> > >
> > > You should look into v4 CPUs while at it.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Erik
> >
> >
>

Low transfer rate with AB

2016-04-11 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

does anyone got a problem with transfer rate?

We are using at the moment 8x 10k SAS RAID10 disk for local storage for VM
(testing purpose).

Then we are trying ab (ApacheBench) for testing, im gettint low transfer
rate:

Transfer rate:  61.89 [Kbytes/sec] received


http://puzo.lt/srvX144_f.txt

I tested from managed server to host server via LAN - the speed was like
60-63 Kb/s

Also checked raid controler

[root@srv0 ~]# hpacucli ctrl all show config

Smart Array P212 in Slot 2(sn: PACCPID122006CQ)


   SEP (Vendor ID PMCSIERA, Model  SRC 8x6G) 250 (WWID: 5001438020B209DF)


Smart Array P410i in Slot 0 (Embedded)(sn: 50123456789ABCDE)

   array A (SAS, Unused Space: 0  MB)


  logicaldrive 1 (546.8 GB, RAID 1+0, OK)

  physicaldrive 1I:1:1 (port 1I:box 1:bay 1, SAS, 146 GB, OK)
  physicaldrive 1I:1:2 (port 1I:box 1:bay 2, SAS, 146 GB, OK)
  physicaldrive 1I:1:3 (port 1I:box 1:bay 3, SAS, 146 GB, OK)
  physicaldrive 1I:1:4 (port 1I:box 1:bay 4, SAS, 146 GB, OK)
  physicaldrive 2I:1:5 (port 2I:box 1:bay 5, SAS, 146 GB, OK)
  physicaldrive 2I:1:6 (port 2I:box 1:bay 6, SAS, 146 GB, OK)
  physicaldrive 2I:1:7 (port 2I:box 1:bay 7, SAS, 146 GB, OK)
  physicaldrive 2I:1:8 (port 2I:box 1:bay 8, SAS, 146 GB, OK)

   SEP (Vendor ID PMCSIERA, Model  SRC 8x6G) 250 (WWID: 50123456789ABCED)

Does anyone have any ideas whats wrong here?




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +79651806396

Tomorrow's posibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 Core, 512MB RAM, 20GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 11EUR
   - 1 Core, 1024MB RAM, 30GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 18,7EUR
   - 2 Cores, 2048MB RAM, 40GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 27,5EUR
   - 4 Cores, 4096MB RAM, 100GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 46EUR

Re: VM per HOST?

2016-04-11 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Thank you, i'm thinking something like that too.




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +79651806396

Tomorrow's posibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 Core, 512MB RAM, 20GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 11EUR
   - 1 Core, 1024MB RAM, 30GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 18,7EUR
   - 2 Cores, 2048MB RAM, 40GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 27,5EUR
   - 4 Cores, 4096MB RAM, 100GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 46EUR


On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Stavros Konstantaras <s.konstanta...@uva.nl
> wrote:

> In our case (general purpose VMs) we decided to have the system's RAM as
> the reference point to create our VM limit. For example, if the server has
> 128GBs of RAM and the default VM profile is 1 vCPU + 4Gbs RAM, then our
> upper limit is roughly 30VMs per server.
>
> Over provisioning the CPU is usually not a problem but over provisioning
> the RAM can be the start of many problems .
>
> Kind Regards
> Stavros
>
> 
> Stavros Konstantaras
> Science faculty Research IT support (FEIOG)
> University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH
>
> Fingerprint: E5E5 9B19 D1CD 88CD 4763  3465 A8DC 7C92 330F D59A
>
> > On 11 Apr 2016, at 13:09, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Mindaugas Milinavičius <
> > mindau...@clustspace.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> how many VM's do you creating per host?
> >> What you prefer E5-2650v3 or E5-2630v3 (less power, 2x cheaper CPU, and
> >> only ±20% less benchmark)
> >>
> >>
> > I'd say it depends on the workload. For generic purpose VMs CPU is
> usually
> > not the bottleneck and personally I'd pick the cheaper one.
> >
> > You should look into v4 CPUs while at it.
> >
> > --
> > Erik
>
>

VM per HOST?

2016-04-11 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

how many VM's do you creating per host?
What you prefer E5-2650v3 or E5-2630v3 (less power, 2x cheaper CPU, and
only ±20% less benchmark)



Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +79651806396

Tomorrow's posibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 Core, 512MB RAM, 20GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 11EUR
   - 1 Core, 1024MB RAM, 30GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 18,7EUR
   - 2 Cores, 2048MB RAM, 40GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 27,5EUR
   - 4 Cores, 4096MB RAM, 100GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 46EUR

Re: CloudStack and SAN

2016-04-06 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

At the moment i'm using KVM with local disk. Only secondary storage NAS for
backup's of VM's

I'm interested to stay with KVM, but already looking SAN storage.

V3700 Lenovo or NetApp FAS2552 is the price which i can spend (±25000eur
with 20 600GB SAS+4SSD for cache)...




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +79651806396

Tomorrow's posibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 Core, 512MB RAM, 20GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 11EUR
   - 1 Core, 1024MB RAM, 30GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 18,7EUR
   - 2 Cores, 2048MB RAM, 40GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 27,5EUR
   - 4 Cores, 4096MB RAM, 100GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 46EUR


On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote:

> What Hypervisor(s) are you planning on using?
>
> We use KVM and we've utliized FC backed SANS (Compellent) over the last
> few years. At least on KVM, it can get a bit hairy, as you need to use
> Clustered LVMs, or some other locking in order to support migrations. CLVM
> on hosts is a total pain and adds a great deal of complexity to the hosts.
>
> Our netgen product is using Ceph. There are plenty of folks out there
> using NFS, as it's reliable and simple.
>
> - Si
>
>
> 
> From: uabstarn...@gmail.com <uabstarn...@gmail.com> on behalf of
> Mindaugas Milinavičius <mindau...@clustspace.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 9:33 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: CloudStack and SAN
>
> Hello,
>
> What SAN do you use for your services?
>
> I'm looking for SAN storage for ±500 VM's. Thinking about 15k RPM SAS
> disks
>
> Ofcourse, i'm interested at SolidFire - but not at this time, my budget to
> small:)
>
>
>
> Pagarbiai
> Mindaugas Milinavičius
> UAB STARNITA
> Direktorius
> http://www.clustspace.com
> LT: +37068882880
> RU: +79651806396
>
> Tomorrow's posibilities today
> <http://www.clustspace.com/>
>
>- 1 Core, 512MB RAM, 20GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
>Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 11EUR
>- 1 Core, 1024MB RAM, 30GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
>Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 18,7EUR
>- 2 Cores, 2048MB RAM, 40GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
>Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 27,5EUR
>- 4 Cores, 4096MB RAM, 100GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
>Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 46EUR
>

CloudStack and SAN

2016-04-06 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Hello,

What SAN do you use for your services?

I'm looking for SAN storage for ±500 VM's. Thinking about 15k RPM SAS
disks

Ofcourse, i'm interested at SolidFire - but not at this time, my budget to
small:)



Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +79651806396

Tomorrow's posibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 Core, 512MB RAM, 20GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 11EUR
   - 1 Core, 1024MB RAM, 30GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 18,7EUR
   - 2 Cores, 2048MB RAM, 40GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 27,5EUR
   - 4 Cores, 4096MB RAM, 100GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 46EUR

Re: SSVM cant route to MS, Iptables keep self-updating

2016-04-05 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

added an additional DNS IP: 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +79651806396

Tomorrow's posibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 Core, 512MB RAM, 20GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 11EUR
   - 1 Core, 1024MB RAM, 30GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 18,7EUR
   - 2 Cores, 2048MB RAM, 40GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 27,5EUR
   - 4 Cores, 4096MB RAM, 100GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 46EUR


On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Syafiq Rokman <msyafiq.rok...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I think so. network/interfaces file on host/MS:
>
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
> auto eth0.100
> iface eth0.100 inet manual
> address 172.16.135.179
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> gateway 172.16.135.254
> dns-nameservers 172.16.238.7 172.16.238.6
>
> # Public network
> auto cloudbr0
> iface cloudbr0 inet manual
>
>  bridge_ports eth0.200
>  bridge_fd 5
>  bridge_stp off
>  bridge_maxwait 1
>
> # Private network
> auto cloudbr1
> iface cloudbr1 inet manual
> bridge_ports eth0.300
> bridge_fd 5
> bridge_stp off
> bridge_maxwait 1
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:21 PM Mindaugas Milinavičius <
> mindau...@clustspace.com> wrote:
>
> > Is your network configured properly?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Pagarbiai
> > Mindaugas Milinavičius
> > UAB STARNITA
> > Direktorius
> > http://www.clustspace.com
> > LT: +37068882880
> > RU: +79651806396
> >
> > Tomorrow's posibilities today
> > <http://www.clustspace.com/>
> >
> >- 1 Core, 512MB RAM, 20GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
> Los
> >Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 11EUR
> >- 1 Core, 1024MB RAM, 30GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
> Los
> >Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 18,7EUR
> >- 2 Cores, 2048MB RAM, 40GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
> >Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 27,5EUR
> >- 4 Cores, 4096MB RAM, 100GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
> >Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 46EUR
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Syafiq Rokman <msyafiq.rok...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > traceroute to 172.16.238.7 (172.16.238.7), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
> > >  1  172.16.135.12 (172.16.135.12)  2996.763 ms !H  2996.765 ms !H
> > 2996.764
> > > ms !H
> > >
> > > traceroute to 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
> > >  1  s-2059-VM (172.16.135.84)  2996.386 ms !H  2996.374 ms !H  2996.371
> > ms
> > > !H
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:01 PM Syafiq Rokman <msyafiq.rok...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > iptables -L in SSVM :
> > > >
> > > > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state
> NEW
> > > > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > > > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state
> NEW
> > > > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > > > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state
> NEW
> > > > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > > > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state
> NEW
> > > > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > > > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state
> NEW
> > > > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > > > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state
> NEW
> > > > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > > > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state
> NEW
> > > > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > > > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state
> NEW
> > > > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > > > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state
> NEW
> > > > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > > > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state
> NEW
> > > > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > > > REJECT tcp  --

Re: SSVM cant route to MS, Iptables keep self-updating

2016-04-05 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Is your network configured properly?




Pagarbiai
Mindaugas Milinavičius
UAB STARNITA
Direktorius
http://www.clustspace.com
LT: +37068882880
RU: +79651806396

Tomorrow's posibilities today
<http://www.clustspace.com/>

   - 1 Core, 512MB RAM, 20GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 11EUR
   - 1 Core, 1024MB RAM, 30GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los
   Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 18,7EUR
   - 2 Cores, 2048MB RAM, 40GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 27,5EUR
   - 4 Cores, 4096MB RAM, 100GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania,
   Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 46EUR


On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Syafiq Rokman <msyafiq.rok...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> traceroute to 172.16.238.7 (172.16.238.7), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
>  1  172.16.135.12 (172.16.135.12)  2996.763 ms !H  2996.765 ms !H  2996.764
> ms !H
>
> traceroute to 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
>  1  s-2059-VM (172.16.135.84)  2996.386 ms !H  2996.374 ms !H  2996.371 ms
> !H
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:01 PM Syafiq Rokman <msyafiq.rok...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > iptables -L in SSVM :
> >
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
> > tcp dpt:h

Re: SSVM cant route to MS, Iptables keep self-updating

2016-04-05 Thread Mindaugas Milinavičius

Post traceroute
5 апр. 2016 г. 15:51 пользователь "Rafael Weingärtner" <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> написал:

> can you post your iptables -L from SSVM?
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Syafiq Rokman 
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, just tried ping from SSVM to DNS, and 8.8.8.8, and google.com. Host
> > still unreachable.
> > Healthcheck script also returning host unreachable.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:39 PM Rafael Weingärtner <
> > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, so in your host there is nothing blocking the in-out/going
> requests,
> > > but still the ping command does not work?
> > >
> > > That rule you presented earlier should not block “icmp-echo-request”.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Syafiq Rokman <
> msyafiq.rok...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've checked the host iptables just now...there were rules
> accomodating
> > > the
> > > > SSVM and CPVM.
> > > > But I've made the mistake of flushing the iptables rules without any
> > > > backup.
> > > >  Now Iptables -P, -L has:
> > > >
> > > > -P INPUT ACCEPT
> > > > -P FORWARD ACCEPT
> > > > -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
> > > > -A INPUT -j ACCEPT
> > > > -A INPUT -j ACCEPT
> > > > -A FORWARD -j ACCEPT
> > > > -A OUTPUT -j ACCEPT
> > > > Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> > > > target prot opt source   destination
> > > > ACCEPT all  --  anywhere anywhere
> > > > ACCEPT all  --  anywhere anywhere
> > > >
> > > > Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
> > > > target prot opt source   destination
> > > > ACCEPT all  --  anywhere anywhere
> > > >
> > > > Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> > > > target prot opt source   destination
> > > > ACCEPT all  --  anywhere anywhere
> > > >
> > > > One more thing, this setup is self-hosted.The MS and host are on the
> > same
> > > > machine.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:22 PM Rafael Weingärtner <
> > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Those rules should not block the "ping" comand, hence they are
> meant
> > to
> > > > > block "http" right?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I have been having the same problem lately with XenServer.
> > > > >
> > > > > The iptables rules that are rejecting my traffic are at the host
> > > itself.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you check your host iptables configs?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 3:42 AM, Syafiq Rokman <
> > > msyafiq.rok...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can't ping the default gateway of the SSVM or 8.8.8.8 from the
> > SSVM.
> > > > > > I'm using KVM as hypervisor.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tried changing iptables rules on SSVM using
> > > > > >
> > > > > > iptables -F
> > > > > > iptables -X
> > > > > > iptables -t nat -F
> > > > > > iptables -t nat -X
> > > > > > iptables -t mangle -F
> > > > > > iptables -t mangle -X
> > > > > > iptables -P INPUT ACCEPT
> > > > > > iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
> > > > > > iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
> > > > > >
> > > > > > to allow all connections, but keep getting this at Chain OUTPUT:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere
>  state
> > > NEW
> > > > > tcp
> > > > > > dpt:http reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > > > > > REJECT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere
>  state
> > > NEW
> > > > > tcp
> > > > > > dpt:https reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:49 PM Rafael Weingärtner <
> > > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > What hypervisor are you using?
> > > > > > > Did change the iptables rules at the SSVM itself?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:50 AM, Glenn Wagner <
> > > > > glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Can you ping the default gateway of the SSVM?
> > > > > > > > Can you ping google DNS 8.8.8.8 from the SSVM?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > Glenn
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Glenn Wagner
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com
> > > > > > > > www.shapeblue.com
> > > > > > > > 2nd Floor, Oudehuis Centre, 122 Main Rd, Somerset West, Cape
> > Town
> > > > > > > > 7130South Africa
> > > > > > > > @shapeblue
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > > > > From: Syafiq Rokman [mailto:msyafiq.rok...@gmail.com]
> > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, 04 April 2016 11:16 AM
> > > > > > > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > > > > Subject: SSVM cant route to MS, Iptables keep self-updating
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi everyone!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Im running CS 4.8 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So I've managed to set up everything, but I still cant
> install
> > > > > >

55 matches

Mail list logo