Re: Realhost ip certificate replacement
You can follow these articles https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Procedure+to+Replace +realhostip.com+with+Your+Own+Domain+Name https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=43188254 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Realhost+IP+changes Thanks prashant On 9/30/15, 11:45 PM, "Indra Pramana"wrote: >Hi Jaime, > >For me, I just get the new certificate and the private key, and then >upload >them via CloudStack GUI > Infrastructure > SSL Certificate. The SSVM and >CPVM will be rebooted as a result. > >This is provided that the intermediate and root certificates are the same, >otherwise you might need to upload them as well via API. That's why it's >best to renew the certificate from the same CA provider. > >Hope that helps, thank you. > >Cheers. > >-ip- > > >On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Jaime Orlando Rojas Sanchez < >jaime.ro...@kumo.com.co> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Last year we replaced realhost ip certificate with our own certificate, >> now it expires and we have to replace it with the new one. Could anybody >> share with me how to do that without interrupt the service? >> >> Regards, >> >> Jaime Rojas >> >> >>
Re: how to disable CPVM http trace and disable sslV3 poodle security issue
You need to upgrade system vm templates , check the https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/ for mote details Related info thought might help 1. does changing in httpd.conf reflects the setting for apache2? Use the nmap script as suggested below to identify ssl versions on installed system vm template. Check the suggested change works or not. http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/70733/how-do-i-use-openssl-s-cl ient-to-test-for-absence-of-sslv3-support 2. TLSv1.2 is the latest to be used and suggested default, ssl protocol and the ciphers we use leads to vulnerability, the settings for these as well should be available in similar config file. In our code, search for TLS leads to usage at places, and assumption is that it should negotiate the protocol version from configured and available latest version to least, so if TLSv1.2 is configured on server and client supports it, then it should work. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/email-security-appliance /118518-technote-esa-00.html Regards, Santhosh __ On 8/20/15, 11:43 AM, jerry 1163...@qq.com wrote: hello,We use cloudstack 3.0.2 ,Since CPVM have http trace enable and sslV3 poodle securiy issue, Does anyone how to disable it。 Some security tools said web proxy console link have php security issue,How to upgrade php for CPVM Thanks
Re: KVM - convert vmdk to qcow2 - send volume to CS
Yes attach-detach to a vm then you should see snapshot option ~prashant On 8/17/15, 5:29 PM, Luciano Castro luciano.cas...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Prashant I can´t take snapshot from a datadisk, there´s no option to do this. Did you mean I try to attach this disk to an instance, take a snapshot and convert to a template? thanks On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Prashant Kumar Mishra prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com wrote: You can take snapshot and convert it to template and then try to deploy vm. ~prashant On 8/15/15, 3:52 AM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote: Does the Volumes uploaded always will be DATADISK type? Yes. Regards, Somesh -Original Message- From: Luciano Castro [mailto:luciano.cas...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 11:04 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: KVM - convert vmdk to qcow2 - send volume to CS Another question. My volume is now a DATADISK. I can´t instantiate a new VM from this disk. Does the Volumes uploaded always will be DATADISK type? thanks On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Luciano Castro luciano.cas...@gmail.com wrote: Vadim Yes, the problem seems to be on SSVM. When I could try with wget , I receive connection refused. I deleted the OUTPUT rule which denies port 80, and now it worked. Is it correct ? Does the SSVM wouldn´t have access to external HTTP servers? Thank you!! On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Have you tried to wget from management server or SSVM or both? It may be a probleem with SSVM. Try to check SSVM also Vadim. -Original Message- From: Luciano Castro [mailto:luciano.cas...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 3:49 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: KVM - convert vmdk to qcow2 - send volume to CS Yes, with wget is working (i took off the web proxy from the middle) , as I said before From the manager I do wget normally: [root@1q2 ~]# wget 10.253.118.181/dsv-str-tools.qcow2 --2015-08-14 12:37:49-- http://10.253.118.181/dsv-str-tools.qcow2 Connecting to 10.253.118.181:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 20611792896 (19G) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: “dsv-str-tools.qcow2†0% [ ] 94,175,024 112M/s ^C And the log of nginx is ok: 10.253.118.180 - - [14/Aug/2015:11:49:38 +] GET /dsv-str-tools.qcow2 HTTP/1.1 200 50680 - Java/1.7.0_79 - 10.253.118.180 - - [14/Aug/2015:11:50:33 +] GET /dsv-str-tools.qcow2 HTTP/1.0 200 214111416 - Wget/1.12 (linux-gnu) - 10.253.118.180 - - [14/Aug/2015:12:15:07 +] GET /dsv-str-tools.qcow2 HTTP/1.0 200 139332352 - Wget/1.12 (linux-gnu) - On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Can you try to wget URL ? May be you have error in nginx configuration? Vadim. -Original Message- From: Luciano Castro [mailto:luciano.cas...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 3:40 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: KVM - convert vmdk to qcow2 - send volume to CS I asked this because I´m getting error with GUI. I put this qcow2 image on a KVM host, and I installed a nginx for webserver. After I tryed to send the volume , but the log shows me connection refused 2015-08-14 12:30:41,253 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (AgentManager-Handler-9:null) Seq 11-2078692703008194575: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 102228234536925, via: 11, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, [{com.cloud.agent.api.storage.DownloadAnswer:{jobId:206c8462-2f53 -4a70-8430-5de582438915,downloadPct:0,errorString:Connection refused,downloadStatus:DOWNLOAD_ERROR,downloadPath:/mnt/SecSto rage/f53e0727-8384-3fd0-9770-560676ea5d9a/volumes/2/152/dnld6851218099 292451394tmp_,installPath:volumes/2/152,templateSize:0,templat ePhySicalSize:0,result:true,details:Connection refused,wait:0}}] } From the manager I do wget normally: [root@1q2 ~]# wget 10.253.118.181/dsv-str-tools.qcow2 --2015-08-14 12:37:49-- http://10.253.118.181/dsv-str-tools.qcow2 Connecting to 10.253.118.181:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 20611792896 (19G) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: “dsv-str-tools.qcow2†0% [ ] 94,175,024 112M/s ^C And the log of nginx is ok: 10.253.118.180 - - [14/Aug/2015:11:49:38 +] GET /dsv-str-tools.qcow2 HTTP/1.1 200 50680 - Java/1.7.0_79 - 10.253.118.180 - - [14/Aug/2015:11:50:33 +] GET /dsv-str-tools.qcow2 HTTP/1.0 200 214111416 - Wget/1.12 (linux-gnu) - 10.253.118.180 - - [14/Aug/2015:12:15:07 +] GET /dsv-str-tools.qcow2 HTTP/1.0 200 139332352 - Wget/1.12 (linux-gnu) - I don´t know why I´m getting refused. thanks On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:15 AM
Re: KVM - convert vmdk to qcow2 - send volume to CS
You can take snapshot and convert it to template and then try to deploy vm. ~prashant On 8/15/15, 3:52 AM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote: Does the Volumes uploaded always will be DATADISK type? Yes. Regards, Somesh -Original Message- From: Luciano Castro [mailto:luciano.cas...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 11:04 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: KVM - convert vmdk to qcow2 - send volume to CS Another question. My volume is now a DATADISK. I can´t instantiate a new VM from this disk. Does the Volumes uploaded always will be DATADISK type? thanks On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Luciano Castro luciano.cas...@gmail.com wrote: Vadim Yes, the problem seems to be on SSVM. When I could try with wget , I receive connection refused. I deleted the OUTPUT rule which denies port 80, and now it worked. Is it correct ? Does the SSVM wouldn´t have access to external HTTP servers? Thank you!! On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Have you tried to wget from management server or SSVM or both? It may be a probleem with SSVM. Try to check SSVM also Vadim. -Original Message- From: Luciano Castro [mailto:luciano.cas...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 3:49 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: KVM - convert vmdk to qcow2 - send volume to CS Yes, with wget is working (i took off the web proxy from the middle) , as I said before From the manager I do wget normally: [root@1q2 ~]# wget 10.253.118.181/dsv-str-tools.qcow2 --2015-08-14 12:37:49-- http://10.253.118.181/dsv-str-tools.qcow2 Connecting to 10.253.118.181:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 20611792896 (19G) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: “dsv-str-tools.qcow2†0% [ ] 94,175,024 112M/s ^C And the log of nginx is ok: 10.253.118.180 - - [14/Aug/2015:11:49:38 +] GET /dsv-str-tools.qcow2 HTTP/1.1 200 50680 - Java/1.7.0_79 - 10.253.118.180 - - [14/Aug/2015:11:50:33 +] GET /dsv-str-tools.qcow2 HTTP/1.0 200 214111416 - Wget/1.12 (linux-gnu) - 10.253.118.180 - - [14/Aug/2015:12:15:07 +] GET /dsv-str-tools.qcow2 HTTP/1.0 200 139332352 - Wget/1.12 (linux-gnu) - On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Can you try to wget URL ? May be you have error in nginx configuration? Vadim. -Original Message- From: Luciano Castro [mailto:luciano.cas...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 3:40 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: KVM - convert vmdk to qcow2 - send volume to CS I asked this because I´m getting error with GUI. I put this qcow2 image on a KVM host, and I installed a nginx for webserver. After I tryed to send the volume , but the log shows me connection refused 2015-08-14 12:30:41,253 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (AgentManager-Handler-9:null) Seq 11-2078692703008194575: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 102228234536925, via: 11, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, [{com.cloud.agent.api.storage.DownloadAnswer:{jobId:206c8462-2f53 -4a70-8430-5de582438915,downloadPct:0,errorString:Connection refused,downloadStatus:DOWNLOAD_ERROR,downloadPath:/mnt/SecSto rage/f53e0727-8384-3fd0-9770-560676ea5d9a/volumes/2/152/dnld6851218099 292451394tmp_,installPath:volumes/2/152,templateSize:0,templat ePhySicalSize:0,result:true,details:Connection refused,wait:0}}] } From the manager I do wget normally: [root@1q2 ~]# wget 10.253.118.181/dsv-str-tools.qcow2 --2015-08-14 12:37:49-- http://10.253.118.181/dsv-str-tools.qcow2 Connecting to 10.253.118.181:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 20611792896 (19G) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: “dsv-str-tools.qcow2†0% [ ] 94,175,024 112M/s ^C And the log of nginx is ok: 10.253.118.180 - - [14/Aug/2015:11:49:38 +] GET /dsv-str-tools.qcow2 HTTP/1.1 200 50680 - Java/1.7.0_79 - 10.253.118.180 - - [14/Aug/2015:11:50:33 +] GET /dsv-str-tools.qcow2 HTTP/1.0 200 214111416 - Wget/1.12 (linux-gnu) - 10.253.118.180 - - [14/Aug/2015:12:15:07 +] GET /dsv-str-tools.qcow2 HTTP/1.0 200 139332352 - Wget/1.12 (linux-gnu) - I don´t know why I´m getting refused. thanks On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Luciano, I am afraid there is only HTTP. Vadim. -Original Message- From: Luciano Castro [mailto:luciano.cas...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 2:56 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: KVM - convert vmdk to qcow2 - send volume to CS Hi! I converted vmdk to qcow2 (qemu-img convert -O qcow2 travis-ci-flat.vmdk dsv-str-tools.qcow2), and I need know if there´s another way to submit the volume instead by HTTP (via GUI). If i have the volume
Re: Register iso so slow.
Check out this https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM%2C+templates%2C +Secondary+storage+troubleshooting ~prashant On 8/12/15, 12:13 PM, Borhan Asgharnejad b.asgharne...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Vadiam The SSVM and CPVM is running and up. The status of registering iso is null, and i figure out when i try get iso file on SSVM by wget command (wget http://192.168.76.5/isoname.iso) http://10.39.1.9/isoname.iso say cannot write to 'isoname http://10.39.1.9/isoname.iso.iso' (No space left on device). i have problem to register iso could you please tell me what can i do. by the way i have about 400 GB free space on secondary storage. On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Hello Borhan, 1. It all depends on the speed of you network, storage and size of the ISO image. If you analyze the whole process chain -- you can find bottlenecks. Then you can (probably) optimize something. It is better to show numbers here to be able to judge. 2. Go to ISO, Zone tab, klick on zone and you will see ISO details tab with downloaded % and status. Vadim. -Original Message- From: Borhan Asgharnejad [mailto:b.asgharne...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 8:53 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Register iso so slow. Hi All, 1- Could you please guide me how i increase speed of registering iso template. 2- how could see percentage of iso that uploaded to ssvm in cloud stack 4.5.
Re: resources release when deleting account or user!
Yes , there are few global setting related to cleanup set them to low value for quick cleanup . On 7/27/15, 12:01 PM, gagan chhabra gagan.13031...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Does deleting an account/user-within-an-account frees all storage, expunges the VMs and releases all other resources held by the account/user ? If no, how do I free all resources in bulk (primary-storage/secondary-storage/CPUs etc.) held by an account? Gagandeep S. Chhabra
Re: AW: system VMs on local storage
Yes , if your zone is in enabled state and system vm went down , CS will try to bring them up on shared/local storage depend on current system.vm.use.local.storage settings . On 5/28/15, 5:19 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Hi Glenn, will CS create the SystemVMs after a XenServer failure automatically? We do not want to use shared storage at all. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Glenn Wagner [mailto:glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 11:13 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: RE: system VMs on local storage Hi, I honestly would not put the System VM's on local Storage on a Production environment, if you have a Xenserver failure the System VM's will go down, You will need to recreate them causing downtime. Glenn Wagner Senior Consultant, South Africa Phone: +27 21 527 0091 | Mobile: +27 73 917 4111 glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeBlue ShapeBlue SA (Pty) Ltd, 2nd Floor, Oudehuis Centre, 122 Main Rd, Somerset West, Cape Town 7130 -Original Message- From: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH [mailto:s.brues...@proio.com] Sent: 28 May 2015 10:58 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: system VMs on local storage Hi, we are thinking about to use only local storage in our CS installation. We are using XenServer 6.2 SP1 as hypervisor. What about System VMs? Is it okay to change system.vm.use.local.storage to true and then migrate all System VMs and Router VMs to local storage? Is it wise to put System VMs on local storage? Thank for sharing your experience! Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918 Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1dYmNXcpqRQ4xMQy8yCKTrGSQaWN6hV3CuoIg11a tTedR7-uxNmPD5eRyhs9cqh-RJ__Q9a5GlyOpZv6fZdddcg0OzTeAwpLrvQxK3BIQGTeesvIvS r6VYLK_-KkXUlV6J6lRwaLZDlCKv8EvEQgDo2tz7k-MM84I94oI3Vj1Gb24JeHSV6g38nwpANW JekyS/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design-and-build%2F%2F CSForge rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1c3DThpdAoMLpcII1DUg4mb77LEBA8F47u6r _3GRCRkgV7i8PzG1Y5Y0XmXhnvTaXXy-lPJKaS0bZGnLc40yXglmoSo5ETEKKOW0Zr45ZFTXao QtOF6JrMMKIF-EzLy4LLsb0my3uHt6xrUlvPspMsY47e-7AZO1uxdrRrM5vYNpmrj3JHkDsn1k 0beubo5Mp/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcsforge%2F CloudStack Consultinghttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1_IL8Rn9bKuPzhdLeJKPw2Ej4Kr2BCDuYMl U7I1pHQCnxmKmrAuRwp6qoIHRQdQc0Vu7Ql1RGVb1BkO8dyTricX8p7w-wN9nuDcecE-FgEXte 7pF9ddfZV_BRO4y2RkbMp8fe05TFRNmzoNQITeQZ2ztjU-5EgAk20qetQZeqxfE3Kqrt4HdC2a kdrUI6Ph4E/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-consultancy%2F CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/138uz6eUEWimRjLZUGUdElT3G29pRsqBVF 9ILB39CNDFAq5H-DCSgHcURR69gu2YvPgsr9bqqP0hwMbT6GvRBkWyLkqLsQgCjr3O25isxzcL 3qWrozWWCUinjhJ4YBwN_pUS0qJlDHWgY7FPfhDjveaY4Olo9W8jv7--bIrlsf9ESbyRbgNmmN tectVP5i2ul/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-software-engineering%2 F CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://secure-web.cisco.com/11EBpBbT6Pgt-_ei9szQxDq74yMhUaXJP0C9Fr DWdCS0BL8x8yBi-alFE2EusPeJprg6GZHUQ6026IYhBpZeDfmLUQlANyN70XBbXFhZ23Yxe17v qDRu-fbzcpExdZirjsp3I5SWOY5b7Nzn-kVjSgHa5sGlcJUtUZrVkRghl7yHAxqSVODAhebnpy TkPXE8w/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-infrastructure-support%2F CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1j_s3pZ4AyTCLWjFpmvOAq76V6KZfUhiwdT0Dp y6Kf9wggW63JYjZWebwZwBf_iOZo-DQyrWy6VFGIMFzJNEUnH8IPoV7itBSAn7wvG2BlPkH2om pe0tdiXuU2_kOCGoyT4DJSAzECe3HirB_H_3A3IKQYUIXLtJFevlLHe4OEbXGtizArkn-OHejk OcjCgIb/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-training%2F This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape
Re: AW: system VMs on local storage
1-To recreate router vm you need to stop-start any existing vm or deploy a new vm . 2-In case if you are changing storage(shared to local or local to share) you need to destroy existing router vm and follow step 1. On 5/28/15, 6:12 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: How do you recreate VRs? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 14:30 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: system VMs on local storage SSVM and CPVM will be started simultaneously. But virtual routers won't get created automatically. On 28-May-2015, at 5:51 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Hi Prashant, so the only downside is that it will take some time until CS created all SystemVMs after a host crash? Will CS create SystemVMs one by one? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 14:12 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: system VMs on local storage Yes , if your zone is in enabled state and system vm went down , CS will try to bring them up on shared/local storage depend on current system.vm.use.local.storage settings . On 5/28/15, 5:19 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Hi Glenn, will CS create the SystemVMs after a XenServer failure automatically? We do not want to use shared storage at all. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Glenn Wagner [mailto:glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 11:13 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: RE: system VMs on local storage Hi, I honestly would not put the System VM's on local Storage on a Production environment, if you have a Xenserver failure the System VM's will go down, You will need to recreate them causing downtime. Glenn Wagner Senior Consultant, South Africa Phone: +27 21 527 0091 | Mobile: +27 73 917 4111 glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeBlue ShapeBlue SA (Pty) Ltd, 2nd Floor, Oudehuis Centre, 122 Main Rd, Somerset West, Cape Town 7130 -Original Message- From: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH [mailto:s.brues...@proio.com] Sent: 28 May 2015 10:58 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: system VMs on local storage Hi, we are thinking about to use only local storage in our CS installation. We are using XenServer 6.2 SP1 as hypervisor. What about System VMs? Is it okay to change system.vm.use.local.storage to true and then migrate all System VMs and Router VMs to local storage? Is it wise to put System VMs on local storage? Thank for sharing your experience! Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918 Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1dYmNXcpqRQ4xMQy8yCKTrGSQaWN6hV3Cuo Ig 11a tTedR7-uxNmPD5eRyhs9cqh-RJ__Q9a5GlyOpZv6fZdddcg0OzTeAwpLrvQxK3BIQGTee sv IvS r6VYLK_-KkXUlV6J6lRwaLZDlCKv8EvEQgDo2tz7k-MM84I94oI3Vj1Gb24JeHSV6g38n wp ANW JekyS/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design-and-build%2F%2F CSForge rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1c3DThpdAoMLpcII1DUg4mb77LEBA8F 47 u6r _3GRCRkgV7i8PzG1Y5Y0XmXhnvTaXXy-lPJKaS0bZGnLc40yXglmoSo5ETEKKOW0Zr45Z FT Xao QtOF6JrMMKIF-EzLy4LLsb0my3uHt6xrUlvPspMsY47e-7AZO1uxdrRrM5vYNpmrj3JHk Ds n1k 0beubo5Mp/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcsforge%2F CloudStack Consultinghttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1_IL8Rn9bKuPzhdLeJKPw2Ej4Kr2BC Du YMl U7I1pHQCnxmKmrAuRwp6qoIHRQdQc0Vu7Ql1RGVb1BkO8dyTricX8p7w-wN9nuDcecE-F gE Xte 7pF9ddfZV_BRO4y2RkbMp8fe05TFRNmzoNQITeQZ2ztjU-5EgAk20qetQZeqxfE3Kqrt4 Hd C2a kdrUI6Ph4E/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-consultancy%2F CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/138uz6eUEWimRjLZUGUdElT3G29pR sq BVF 9ILB39CNDFAq5H
Re: Routing Feature while registering template.
Sadly there is no account level setting for this , only way is to change GS after account creation to empty and restart ms On 5/4/15, 11:38 PM, raja sekhar rajsekhar@gmail.com wrote: but this will effect every account in cloudstack, is there any account level setting in order to dedicate this router to a particular account. Regards, Rajasekhar. On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:05 AM, raja sekhar rajsekhar@gmail.com wrote: hi prasanth, thanks for your reply. now i am getting router from an uploaded template. Regards, Rajasekhar. On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 5:24 AM, Prashant Kumar Mishra prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com wrote: Which template r u using ? ,Try with default system vm template. After registering go to global settings and search for router.template ,depend on hypervisor update the setting with template id/uuid . prashant On 5/1/15, 12:44 PM, raja sekhar rajsekhar@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, while we are uploading template,there is a feature called Routing,when it is checked it is showing check this if the template is used for deploying router. but i am unable to deploy router from that template. can any one tell me how to use this feature? Is there any possibility to use our own router instead of using cloudstack router? please tell me the procedure how to use this in cs 4.4.3. Regards, Rajasekhar.
Re: Routing Feature while registering template.
Which template r u using ? ,Try with default system vm template. After registering go to global settings and search for router.template ,depend on hypervisor update the setting with template id/uuid . prashant On 5/1/15, 12:44 PM, raja sekhar rajsekhar@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, while we are uploading template,there is a feature called Routing,when it is checked it is showing check this if the template is used for deploying router. but i am unable to deploy router from that template. can any one tell me how to use this feature? Is there any possibility to use our own router instead of using cloudstack router? please tell me the procedure how to use this in cs 4.4.3. Regards, Rajasekhar.
Re: CPVM and SSVM certificate not working
To rule out DNS issues try resolving ips locally on ssvm,cpvm. On 4/22/15, 7:59 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: did you create all DNS records aaa-bbb-ccc-ddd.yourdomain.com ? wild card SSL - any ROOT CA and Intermediate CA uploaded also ? On 22 April 2015 at 15:52, Sonali Jadhav son...@servercentralen.se wrote: Hi, I have installed certificate for CPVM and SSVM as per this http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX133468 or https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Procedure+to+Repla ce+realhostip.com+with+Your+Own+Domain+Name Now problem is, its giving error that server not found ? I don't see errors in mgmt. logs, nothing in cpvm logs as well. Its weird, Any suggestion ? /Sonali -- Andrija Panić
Re: unable to start CS4.5-RC4
This is common exception(I see this exception every time I restart my ms and ms works fine) , should not be the reason . On 3/13/15, 9:53 PM, d...@soleks.com d...@soleks.com wrote: Encountered IOException java.io.IOException: Stream closed at java.util.zip.ZipInputStream.ensureOpen(ZipInputStream.java:66) at java.util.zip.ZipInputStream.getNextEntry(ZipInputStream.java:115) at java.util.jar.JarInputStream.getNextEntry(JarInputStream.java:142) at java.util.jar.JarInputStream.getNextJarEntry(JarInputStream.java:179) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.serializer.OnwireClassRegistry.getFromJARF ile(OnwireClassRegistry.java:162) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.serializer.OnwireClassRegistry.getClasses( OnwireClassRegistry.java:119)
Re: no operation available on template
Stoping-starting secondary storage vm should update ur template state . On 3/12/15, 3:31 PM, Sonali Jadhav son...@servercentralen.se wrote: Hi, I don't see any operations available on template I created from disk snapshot. I even created new instance from that template, which was working fine. I deleted that instance. But I want to delete template as well now. Its status is blank and Ready is NO. /sonali
Re: Primary storage limit issue
On 2/20/15, 10:46 AM, Sonali Jadhav son...@servercentralen.se wrote: Anyone help? /Sonali -Original Message- From: Sonali Jadhav [mailto:son...@servercentralen.se] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 10:34 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Primary storage limit issue Hi, Yes, in resource_count table, I found this , mysql select * from resource_count where domain_id=3; +-++---+---+-+ | id | account_id | domain_id | type | count | +-++---+---+-+ | 113 | NULL | 3 | user_vm | 0 | | 114 | NULL | 3 | public_ip | 0 | | 115 | NULL | 3 | volume| 0 | | 116 | NULL | 3 | snapshot | 0 | | 117 | NULL | 3 | template | 0 | | 118 | NULL | 3 | project | 0 | | 119 | NULL | 3 | network | 0 | | 120 | NULL | 3 | vpc | 0 | | 121 | NULL | 3 | cpu | 0 | | 122 | NULL | 3 | memory| 0 | | 123 | NULL | 3 | primary_storage | 65498251264 | | 124 | NULL | 3 | secondary_storage | 0 | +-++---+---+-+ So then I logged into same domain from UI, and in Domains section clicked on update resource count. After which in resource_count table primary_storage table value went back to zero. Is this a bug ? Because such way every time domain admin has to update resource count to do actual reset. There should be a bug on this (check jira):After release of resource resource_count table should be updated accordingly 2nd Bug, I have observed, I had set primary storage limit on domain to 40GB, On account there is no limit defined. From domain admin login when I try to create first instance, I can add disk of any size, e.g. I gave 200GB disk and it created instance without any error. But when I try to add more disk or new instance with nay disk size it gives error, that resource limit is exceeded. So how come domain admin can create 200GB primary storage instance when limit is set to 40GB ? Again it is an issue please open a ticket. In what priorities resource count limits are considered by cloudstack ? I thought it was 1. global settings, 2. Domain, 3. Account, 4. Project /Sonali -Original Message- From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 10:15 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Primary storage limit issue Since volumes are expunged , Only possibility is resource_count table , please update the primary storage count to zero (seems a bug to me). On 2/18/15, 8:08 PM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote: Have you looked at the resource_count table? Can you try updating resource count (UI/API) to see if that fixes the issue. Regards, Somesh -Original Message- From: Sonali Jadhav [mailto:son...@servercentralen.se] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 8:05 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Primary storage limit issue Hi, Yes capacity checker is running. mysql select domain_id,name,recreatable,created,attached,updated,removed,state from volumes; +---+---+-+-+ - -+-+-+--+ | domain_id | name | recreatable | created | attached | updated | removed | state| Size | +---+---+-+-+ - -+-+-+--+ | 3 | ROOT-16 | 0 | 2015-02-18 08:29:34 | NULL | 2015-02-18 08:42:40 | 2015-02-18 08:42:40 | Expunged | 21474836480 | | 3 | ROOT-17 | 1 | 2015-02-18 08:28:18 | NULL | 2015-02-18 13:00:07 | 2015-02-18 13:00:07 | Expunged | 262144 | | 3 | ROOT-18 | 0 | 2015-02-18 08:56:07 | NULL | 2015-02-18 09:07:25 | 2015-02-18 09:07:25 | Expunged | 44023414784 | Above are the only 3 values I could find in volumes tables for domain id 3. And still I am getting error that Maximum number of resources of type 'primary_storage' for domain id=3 has been exceeded /Sonali -Original Message- From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 5:43 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Primary storage limit issue 1-Capacity checkers is running ( can be found in global settings) ? 2- Check volumes table if there are some volume in which are not destroyed . Thanks prashant From: Sonali Jadhav son
Re: Primary storage limit issue
Since volumes are expunged , Only possibility is resource_count table , please update the primary storage count to zero (seems a bug to me). On 2/18/15, 8:08 PM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote: Have you looked at the resource_count table? Can you try updating resource count (UI/API) to see if that fixes the issue. Regards, Somesh -Original Message- From: Sonali Jadhav [mailto:son...@servercentralen.se] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 8:05 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Primary storage limit issue Hi, Yes capacity checker is running. mysql select domain_id,name,recreatable,created,attached,updated,removed,state from volumes; +---+---+-+-+- -+-+-+--+ | domain_id | name | recreatable | created | attached | updated | removed | state| Size | +---+---+-+-+- -+-+-+--+ | 3 | ROOT-16 | 0 | 2015-02-18 08:29:34 | NULL | 2015-02-18 08:42:40 | 2015-02-18 08:42:40 | Expunged | 21474836480 | | 3 | ROOT-17 | 1 | 2015-02-18 08:28:18 | NULL | 2015-02-18 13:00:07 | 2015-02-18 13:00:07 | Expunged | 262144 | | 3 | ROOT-18 | 0 | 2015-02-18 08:56:07 | NULL | 2015-02-18 09:07:25 | 2015-02-18 09:07:25 | Expunged | 44023414784 | Above are the only 3 values I could find in volumes tables for domain id 3. And still I am getting error that Maximum number of resources of type 'primary_storage' for domain id=3 has been exceeded /Sonali -Original Message- From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 5:43 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Primary storage limit issue 1-Capacity checkers is running ( can be found in global settings) ? 2- Check volumes table if there are some volume in which are not destroyed . Thanks prashant From: Sonali Jadhav son...@servercentralen.semailto:son...@servercentralen.se Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 at 3:17 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Primary storage limit issue Forgot attachment, sending mail again. :) /Sonali From: Sonali Jadhav Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 3:15 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Primary storage limit issue Hi, I have strange issue with resource limits set on sub-domain. I was doing some tests for checking resource limitation behavior on sub-domain, a/c and project. For account , I didn't set any limits. Instead I set limits on sub-domain. But this specific Primary storage limit(40GB) acted weird. At first in sub-domain, I created new instance (without project), and assigned 41 GB, and it successfully created VM. Then I deleted that VM with Expunge option enabled, and tried to create vm again with disk size 42, which failed with error Maximum number of resources of type 'primary_storage' for domain id=3 has been exceeded Then I gave disk size to 39GB, that also failed with same error. And now if I create any disk size its failing. There are no instances or volumes under that sub-domain. What could be the problem ? Have a look at attached log file. Thanks, /Sonali
Re: Primary storage limit issue
1-Capacity checkers is running ( can be found in global settings) ? 2- Check volumes table if there are some volume in which are not destroyed . Thanks prashant From: Sonali Jadhav son...@servercentralen.semailto:son...@servercentralen.se Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 at 3:17 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Primary storage limit issue Forgot attachment, sending mail again. :) /Sonali From: Sonali Jadhav Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 3:15 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Primary storage limit issue Hi, I have strange issue with resource limits set on sub-domain. I was doing some tests for checking resource limitation behavior on sub-domain, a/c and project. For account , I didn’t set any limits. Instead I set limits on sub-domain. But this specific Primary storage limit(40GB) acted weird. At first in sub-domain, I created new instance (without project), and assigned 41 GB, and it successfully created VM. Then I deleted that VM with Expunge option enabled, and tried to create vm again with disk size 42, which failed with error “Maximum number of resources of type 'primary_storage' for domain id=3 has been exceeded” Then I gave disk size to 39GB, that also failed with same error. And now if I create any disk size its failing. There are no instances or volumes under that sub-domain. What could be the problem ? Have a look at attached log file. Thanks, /Sonali
Re: Job failed due to exception Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-192-VM] - ACS 4.4.1 XenServer 6.2
As you said there is not much in MS logs , I could see only ³The VM is in stopped state, detected problem during startup : i-2-192-VM² I think you should look into host logs. `prashant On 2/18/15, 4:05 AM, Motty Cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am unable to start VM in Cloudstack, I get a very generic error, unable to create deployment. I was working, however I need to detach a 2nd disk. I shutdown the VM, detach the 2nd Disk, restart the VM. however, am unable to restart now. please help! Job failed due to exception Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-192-VM] here is the logs: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=6RjTSduU -Motty
Re: Job failed due to exception Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-192-VM] - ACS 4.4.1 XenServer 6.2
What is overcommit on your MS is it is 1 (setting at cluster level if no setting at cluster level check global setting ) please make it 1 and try to strat On 2/18/15, 10:31 AM, Prashant Kumar Mishra prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com wrote: As you said there is not much in MS logs , I could see only ³The VM is in stopped state, detected problem during startup : i-2-192-VM² I think you should look into host logs. `prashant On 2/18/15, 4:05 AM, Motty Cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am unable to start VM in Cloudstack, I get a very generic error, unable to create deployment. I was working, however I need to detach a 2nd disk. I shutdown the VM, detach the 2nd Disk, restart the VM. however, am unable to restart now. please help! Job failed due to exception Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-192-VM] here is the logs: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=6RjTSduU -Motty
Re: Unable to Cancel Maintenance mode after upgrading to from ACS 4.3.2 to 4.4.2
Can you check host table , for the host current state, is it in some transition state. ~prashant On 2/4/15, 5:28 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote: Hello guys, I have found another problem with ACS 4.4.2, which is pretty serious imho. I am no longer able to Cancel Maintenance mode. The GUI shows the following error a few seconds after pressing the button: Command failed due to Internal Server Error The management server shows the following error: 2015-02-03 23:42:15,621 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-23:ctx-04ea4b6d ctx-35701ff3) ===END=== 192.168.169.91 -- GET command=cancelHostMaintenanceid=c092cb59-c770-4747-8d95-75aa49de5d17resp onse=jsonsessionkey=fI2oaYTbgijs1h6HTOTMnJ%2FkChA%3D_=1423006935464 2015-02-03 23:42:15,622 INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor] (API-Job-Executor-1:ctx-1fda9d17 job-11711) Add job-11711 into job monitoring 2015-02-03 23:42:15,623 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (API-Job-Executor-1:ctx-1fda9d17 job-11711) Executing AsyncJobVO {id:11711, userId: 3, accountId: 2, instanceType: Host, instanceId: 1, cmd: org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.host.CancelMaintenanceCmd, cmdInfo: {id:c092cb59-c770-4747-8d95-75aa49de5d17,response:json,sessionkey :fI2oaYTbgijs1h6HTOTMnJ/kChA\u003d,ctxDetails:{\com.cloud.host.Host \:\c092cb59-c770-4747-8d95-75aa49de5d17\},cmdEventType:MAINT.CANCEL ,ctxUserId:3,httpmethod:GET,_:1423006935464,uuid:c092cb59- c770-4747-8d95-75aa49de5d17,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:64857} , cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid: 115129173025114, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created: null} 2015-02-03 23:42:15,646 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher] (API-Job-Executor-1:ctx-1fda9d17 job-11711) Unexpected exception while executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.host.CancelMaintenanceCmd java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.doCancelMaintenance(ResourceManager Impl.java:2083) at com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.cancelMaintenance(ResourceManagerIm pl.java:2140) at com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.cancelMaintenance(ResourceManagerIm pl.java:1127) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java: 57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorIm pl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(Ao pUtils.java:317) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoi nt(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(Refle ctiveMethodInvocation.java:150) at org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(Exp oseInvocationInterceptor.java:91) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(Refle ctiveMethodInvocation.java:172) at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopP roxy.java:204) at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy148.cancelMaintenance(Unknown Source) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.host.CancelMaintenanceCmd.execute( CancelMaintenanceCmd.java:102) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:141) at com.cloud.api.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.runJob(ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.java:108) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInConte xt(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:503) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(Managed ContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(De faultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithC ontext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithCo ntext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedCo ntextRunnable.java:46) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJ obManagerImpl.java:460) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java: 1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java :615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) 2015-02-03 23:42:15,648 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (API-Job-Executor-1:ctx-1fda9d17 job-11711) Complete async job-11711, jobStatus: FAILED, resultCode: 530, result: org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.ExceptionResponse/null/{uuidList:[], errorcode:530} 2015-02-03 23:42:15,664 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (API-Job-Executor-1:ctx-1fda9d17 job-11711) Done executing
Re: unable to get VM console in broswer
I believe she is not using any certificate , it is default http access,browser security setting may required change . On 1/29/15, 4:49 PM, Anshul Gangwar anshul.gang...@citrix.com wrote: It's because SSL certificate which you are using is not trusted by the browser i.e. not issued by well-known Certificate Authority. -Original Message- From: Sonali Jadhav [mailto:son...@servercentralen.se] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 5:45 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: unable to get VM console in broswer In IE as well, It asked if I want to load insecure content. And user has to click yes. /sonali -Original Message- From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 5:13 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: unable to get VM console in broswer Procedure to change https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Procedure+to+Replac e +realhostip.com+with+Your+Own+Domain+Name Is it not working with IE and safari ?. ~prashant On 1/27/15, 4:24 PM, Sonali Jadhav son...@servercentralen.se wrote: Hi, I haven't changed console access method to anything? How can I change that? I think changing it to HTTPS would might help? And I don't get any exception in cloud.log file. I tried taking console of CPVM from web. Check attached log file /sonali -Original Message- From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 2:06 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: unable to get VM console in broswer You should be able to access in safari ,IE ;By default console access method is http until unless you change it to https ,check out this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6990 -prashant On 1/27/15, 1:28 PM, Sonali Jadhav son...@servercentralen.se wrote: Hi, Yes I have cleared browser cache and also checked CPVM logs. They are not helpful. But isn't this error occurs when the page is trying to load some scripts by HTTP instead of HTTPS, so browser is considering it as unsafe content to load? I tried to check with Firebug plugin of firefox. Its making call to CPVM with Public address but with HTTP protocol not HTTPS, And that's the reason behind this issue I feel. html head frameset frame src=http://PublicIPAddressOfCPVM/ajax?token=Xyzandifbkjsnvcsd.. . . . /frameset /html How do I fix this? It's an issue. /Sonali -Original Message- From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 1:59 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: unable to get VM console in broswer Please clear recent history of your browser , Can you check CPVM log while you are trying to access the console . From: Sonali Jadhav son...@servercentralen.semailto:son...@servercentralen.semailto:son a li@ servercentralen.semailto:son...@servercentralen.se Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailt o :us e...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto: use r...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Friday, January 23, 2015 at 6:56 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailt o :us e...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto: use r...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: unable to get VM console in broswer if I try to take console of VM, it shows blank screen, I can see that certificate is loaded but I have to disable
Re: Failed to create VM from specific template (other templates are fine)
If it is not downloaded properly You can stop-start ssvm which will try to download your template . ~prashant On 1/28/15, 1:20 PM, Amir Abbasi abb...@tebyanidc.ir wrote: Hello, Here is a part of the log: 2015-01-28 10:00:54,046 WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref70 and thread id 1503363977 2015-01-28 10:00:54,046 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.VolumeOrchestrator] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Una ble to create Vol[263|vm=199|ROOT]:Unable to copy template to primary storage due to exception:Exception: java.lang.Exception Message: File upload task failed to complete due to: Error writing request body to server 2015-01-28 10:00:54,046 INFO [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Unable to contact resource. com.cloud.exception.StorageUnavailableException: Resource [StoragePool:1] is unreachable: Unable to create Vol[263|vm=199|ROOT]:Unab le to copy template to primary storage due to exception:Exception: java.lang.Exception Message: File upload task failed to complete due to: Error writing request body to server at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.VolumeOrchestrator.recreateVolu me (VolumeOrchestrator.java:1205) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.VolumeOrchestrator.prepare(Volu me Orchestrator.java:1257) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineMana ge rImpl.java:988) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineMana ge rImpl.java:5195) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor568.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorIm pl .java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.j av a:107) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineManag er Impl.java:5340) at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInConte xt (AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:503) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(Managed Co ntextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(De fa ultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithC on text(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithCo nt ext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedCo nt extRunnable.java:46) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJ ob ManagerImpl.java:460) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java: 11 45) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java :6 15) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) 2015-01-28 10:00:54,051 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Cleaning up resources for the vm VM[User|i-15-199-VM] in Starting state 2015-01-28 10:00:54,056 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Seq 1-1339820889 142821334: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 52239450489, via: 1(172.28.52.4), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand:{ isProxy:false,executeInSequence:false,checkBeforeCleanup:false,vmNam e :i-15-199-VM,wait:0}}] } 2015-01-28 10:00:54,056 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Seq 1-1339820889 142821334: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 52239450489, via: 1(172.28.52.4), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand :{isProxy:false,executeInSequence:false,checkBeforeCleanup:false,vm Na me:i-15-199-VM,wait:0}}] } 2015-01-28 10:00:54,057 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-49:ctx-44763cb1) Seq 1-1339820889142821334: Executing reques t 2015-01-28 10:00:54,057 INFO [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-49:ctx-44763cb1 172.28.52.4) Executing resource StopCommand: { isProxy:false,executeInSequence:false,checkBeforeCleanup:false,vmNa me :i-15-199-VM,wait:0} 2015-01-28 10:00:54,118 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-15:null) SeqA 3-199070: Processing Seq 3-199070: { C md , MgmtId: -1, via: 3, Ver: v1, Flags: 11, [{com.cloud.agent.api.ConsoleProxyLoadReportCommand:{_proxyVmId:2,_lo ad Info:{\n
Re: Failed to create VM from specific template (other templates are fine)
essage: File upload task failed to complete due to: Error writing request body to server Since upload task failed to complete ,you have to make sure template get downloaded properly .May be register a new template On 1/28/15, 2:19 PM, Amir Abbasi abb...@tebyanidc.ir wrote: Hello, The template is Ready and status is Download Complete, do you still offer trying again to download template? -Original Message- From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:52 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Failed to create VM from specific template (other templates are fine) If it is not downloaded properly You can stop-start ssvm which will try to download your template . ~prashant On 1/28/15, 1:20 PM, Amir Abbasi abb...@tebyanidc.ir wrote: Hello, Here is a part of the log: 2015-01-28 10:00:54,046 WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref70 and thread id 1503363977 2015-01-28 10:00:54,046 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.VolumeOrchestrator] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Una ble to create Vol[263|vm=199|ROOT]:Unable to copy template to primary storage due to exception:Exception: java.lang.Exception Message: File upload task failed to complete due to: Error writing request body to server 2015-01-28 10:00:54,046 INFO [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Unable to contact resource. com.cloud.exception.StorageUnavailableException: Resource [StoragePool:1] is unreachable: Unable to create Vol[263|vm=199|ROOT]:Unab le to copy template to primary storage due to exception:Exception: java.lang.Exception Message: File upload task failed to complete due to: Error writing request body to server at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.VolumeOrchestrator.recreateV olu me (VolumeOrchestrator.java:1205) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.VolumeOrchestrator.prepare(V olu me Orchestrator.java:1257) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineM ana ge rImpl.java:988) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineM ana ge rImpl.java:5195) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor568.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccesso rIm pl .java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProx y.j av a:107) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineMa nag er Impl.java:5340) at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInCo nte xt (AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:503) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(Mana ged Co ntextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call (De fa ultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWi thC on text(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWit hCo nt ext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(Manage dCo nt extRunnable.java:46) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(Asy ncJ ob ManagerImpl.java:460) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java : 11 45) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.j ava :6 15) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) 2015-01-28 10:00:54,051 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Cleaning up resources for the vm VM[User|i-15-199-VM] in Starting state 2015-01-28 10:00:54,056 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Seq 1-1339820889 142821334: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 52239450489, via: 1(172.28.52.4), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand:{ isProxy:false,executeInSequence:false,checkBeforeCleanup:false,vm Nam e :i-15-199-VM,wait:0}}] } 2015-01-28 10:00:54,056 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Seq 1-1339820889 142821334: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 52239450489, via: 1(172.28.52.4), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand :{isProxy:false,executeInSequence:false
Re: unable to get VM console in broswer
You should be able to access in safari ,IE ;By default console access method is http until unless you change it to https ,check out this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6990 -prashant On 1/27/15, 1:28 PM, Sonali Jadhav son...@servercentralen.se wrote: Hi, Yes I have cleared browser cache and also checked CPVM logs. They are not helpful. But isn't this error occurs when the page is trying to load some scripts by HTTP instead of HTTPS, so browser is considering it as unsafe content to load? I tried to check with Firebug plugin of firefox. Its making call to CPVM with Public address but with HTTP protocol not HTTPS, And that's the reason behind this issue I feel. html head frameset frame src=http://PublicIPAddressOfCPVM/ajax?token=Xyzandifbkjsnvcsd . /frameset /html How do I fix this? It's an issue. /Sonali -Original Message- From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 1:59 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: unable to get VM console in broswer Please clear recent history of your browser , Can you check CPVM log while you are trying to access the console . From: Sonali Jadhav son...@servercentralen.semailto:son...@servercentralen.semailto:sonali@ servercentralen.semailto:son...@servercentralen.se Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:us e...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:use r...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Friday, January 23, 2015 at 6:56 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:us e...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:use r...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: unable to get VM console in broswer if I try to take console of VM, it shows blank screen, I can see that certificate is loaded but I have to disable
Re: unable to get VM console in broswer
Procedure to change https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Procedure+to+Replace +realhostip.com+with+Your+Own+Domain+Name Is it not working with IE and safari ?. ~prashant On 1/27/15, 4:24 PM, Sonali Jadhav son...@servercentralen.se wrote: Hi, I haven't changed console access method to anything? How can I change that? I think changing it to HTTPS would might help? And I don't get any exception in cloud.log file. I tried taking console of CPVM from web. Check attached log file /sonali -Original Message- From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 2:06 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: unable to get VM console in broswer You should be able to access in safari ,IE ;By default console access method is http until unless you change it to https ,check out this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6990 -prashant On 1/27/15, 1:28 PM, Sonali Jadhav son...@servercentralen.se wrote: Hi, Yes I have cleared browser cache and also checked CPVM logs. They are not helpful. But isn't this error occurs when the page is trying to load some scripts by HTTP instead of HTTPS, so browser is considering it as unsafe content to load? I tried to check with Firebug plugin of firefox. Its making call to CPVM with Public address but with HTTP protocol not HTTPS, And that's the reason behind this issue I feel. html head frameset frame src=http://PublicIPAddressOfCPVM/ajax?token=Xyzandifbkjsnvcsd... . . /frameset /html How do I fix this? It's an issue. /Sonali -Original Message- From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 1:59 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: unable to get VM console in broswer Please clear recent history of your browser , Can you check CPVM log while you are trying to access the console . From: Sonali Jadhav son...@servercentralen.semailto:son...@servercentralen.semailto:sona li@ servercentralen.semailto:son...@servercentralen.se Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto :us e...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto: use r...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Friday, January 23, 2015 at 6:56 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto :us e...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto: use r...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: unable to get VM console in broswer if I try to take console of VM, it shows blank screen, I can see that certificate is loaded but I have to disable
Re: Multiple ROOT disk for one Instances in CS 4.2.1
| +--++---+-+--+-+ ---+---+--+- +-+--+-- --+++-+-+--- +--+-++- +-+--+-+-+-- -++--+---+-- --++++--+--+ 2 rows in set (0.00 sec) On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Prashant Kumar Mishra prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com wrote: Can you check state of these Disks in DB( volumes table for give instance_id). On 1/23/15, 4:46 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Keerthi, This doesn't ring a bell directly but to investigate further; Did you check in the database whether these are pointing to the same image? This seems like a data corruption, to me. When you say stop/start the vm, do you mean from cloudstack/xenserver or within the vm? On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Keerthiraja SJ sjkeer...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone can help on this. Thanks, Keerthi On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Keerthiraja SJ sjkeer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi For one of my Instances I could see many multiple of RootDisk. Because of this when xenserver reboots or if I stop and start the instances my VM is not responding. How can I fix this issue. I could see this issue almost out 173 VM's 5 are like this. *Below are the one pasted from the Storage CS GUI* ROOT-868ROOTXenServer ROOT-868ROOTXenServeror004-test.net ROOT-868ROOTXenServer ROOT-868ROOTXenServer ROOT-868ROOTXenServer ROOT-868ROOTXenServer ROOT-868ROOTXenServeror004-test.net ROOT-868ROOTXenServer ROOT-868ROOTXenServer ROOT-868ROOTXenServer ROOT-868ROOTXenServer Thanks, Keerthi -- Daan -- Daan -- Daan
Re: unable to get VM console in broswer
Please clear recent history of your browser , Can you check CPVM log while you are trying to access the console . From: Sonali Jadhav son...@servercentralen.semailto:son...@servercentralen.se Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Friday, January 23, 2015 at 6:56 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: unable to get VM console in broswer if I try to take console of VM, it shows blank screen, I can see that certificate is loaded but I have to disable
Re: Clearing template cache on primary storage
I want the template to be pulled down to primary storage each time a deployment starts. I think this can be done using full clone vm deployment . In case of full clone template should get copied every time ,there is a global setting ³vmware.create.full.clone² which controls this attribute . Sadly it is only for vmware. Xen server do support this type of deployment http://support.citrix.com/proddocs/topic/xencenter-61/xs-xc-vms-copy.html , but not sure how to control it form CS. Thanks prashant On 1/23/15, 11:35 AM, Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Kyle, CS generally copies the template from secondary to primary if it does not find an entry in the template_spool_ref table for that template. So if you want CS to copy the template to primary every time you deploy a new vm , you can have a script to deploy vms parallelly and to remove the db entry before deploying each vm. Thanks, Sanjeev CloudPlatform Engineering Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Kyle Flavin [mailto:kyle.fla...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 6:18 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Clearing template cache on primary storage Thanks Somesh. -Original Message- From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 4:28 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Clearing template cache on primary storage Should be under /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/secondary/ You can double check Install Guide under section Prepare System VM Tempate. Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Kyle Flavin [mailto:kyle.fla...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 7:00 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Clearing template cache on primary storage Thanks Somesh. Do you know offhand where I could find that script? That sounds like a good place to start. -Original Message- From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 3:14 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Clearing template cache on primary storage Is it possible to have multiple templates that are just pointers to the existing bits of the source template on secondary storage? Not entirely impossible. I mean its' not going to be pointers, but if you were looking to save time it takes to upload 20 copies, you could manually setup the templates. This requires manual copy and DB updates. You can get a hint of what's required by looking at the script used to prepare the secondary storage for system templates. However, this looks like it's just going to download the same VHD to secondary storage multiple times, creating multiple copies of the template on disk. I thought that's what you were looking for. Copy template is definitely not what you are looking for, because, it is copy from on secondary to another, doesn't involve primary storage. Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Kyle Flavin [mailto:kyle.fla...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 6:06 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Clearing template cache on primary storage Hi Somesh, Is it possible to have multiple templates that are just pointers to the existing bits of the source template on secondary storage? I've tried the following two approaches. First, with Cloudmonkey, I tried to register a new template using something like the following: cloudmonkey register template displaytext=Windows Test Template 1 format=VHD hypervisor=XenServer name=WindowsTestTemplate1 ostypeid=osid url=http://url_to_vhd zoneid=zoneid However, this looks like it's just going to download the same VHD to secondary storage multiple times, creating multiple copies of the template on disk. Second, I tried making a copy of the template: cloudmonkey copy template id=templateid destzoneid=zoneid However, this looks like it will only copy the template between two different zones. It doesn't seem to allow me to copy the template to the same zone, and give it a new name. I don't believe either solution gives me what I'm looking for, because I want is to test the time it's taking the template to get from secondary storage to primary when I do my deployment. Both of the possible solution above seem to include the additional step of copying the full VHD to secondary storage. If I could somehow register a new template, and tell it to use the same bits on disk as the source template (no additional copying of anything to secondary storage), I think that'd give me what I want. But I'm not sure if that's possible. Am I looking at this wrong? -Original Message- From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 6:51 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Clearing template cache on primary storage I do not believe there is any global config or API to achieve what you want (force template
Re: Multiple ROOT disk for one Instances in CS 4.2.1
Can you check state of these Disks in DB( volumes table for give instance_id). On 1/23/15, 4:46 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Keerthi, This doesn't ring a bell directly but to investigate further; Did you check in the database whether these are pointing to the same image? This seems like a data corruption, to me. When you say stop/start the vm, do you mean from cloudstack/xenserver or within the vm? On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Keerthiraja SJ sjkeer...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone can help on this. Thanks, Keerthi On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Keerthiraja SJ sjkeer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi For one of my Instances I could see many multiple of RootDisk. Because of this when xenserver reboots or if I stop and start the instances my VM is not responding. How can I fix this issue. I could see this issue almost out 173 VM's 5 are like this. *Below are the one pasted from the Storage CS GUI* ROOT-868ROOTXenServer ROOT-868ROOTXenServeror004-test.net ROOT-868ROOTXenServer ROOT-868ROOTXenServer ROOT-868ROOTXenServer ROOT-868ROOTXenServer ROOT-868ROOTXenServeror004-test.net ROOT-868ROOTXenServer ROOT-868ROOTXenServer ROOT-868ROOTXenServer ROOT-868ROOTXenServer Thanks, Keerthi -- Daan
Re: Root Disk Resize Not working.
Check out if it is support for your hypervisor https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Root+Resize+Support ~prashant On 1/22/15, 7:31 AM, Mitch.Fiorentini mitch.fiorent...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Everyone: I got root disk resizing against a powered off instance, but when trying to deploy a VM from a template and modifyting the root volume, I get the below error. I'm running CS 4.4.2 2015-01-21 20:51:22,111 INFO [c.c.a.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-6:ctx-da6f3af5 ctx-8b4d49de ctx-07e348ab) Hypervisor None does not support rootdisksize override
Re: expunge disk issue
You should see free space after capacity.check.period which is in global Settings ~prashant On 1/22/15, 12:32 PM, Jochim, Ingo ingo.joc...@bautzen-it.de wrote: Hi all, we are close to our capacity limit on the storage. We noticed that deleting virtual disks within CS (4.2) never does free up space on the storage side. Same for disk migration. We reduced the expunge time but nothing happens. Is there procedure to trigger this and check the status/progress? Thanks, Ingo -- This email was Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. http://www.sophos.com
Re: expunge disk issue
You should see free space after capacity.check.period which is in global settings On 1/22/15, 12:32 PM, Jochim, Ingo ingo.joc...@bautzen-it.de wrote: rigger this and check the status/progre
Re: Can not add a new virtual instance by a template
I am suspecting problem with the template ,check ssvm log can give you details info . Can you check if template got copied properly may be try to download it,check.Also make sure you are using service offering with local storage enabled Thanks prashant On 1/9/15, 1:26 PM, w...@landhightech.com w...@landhightech.com wrote: Hi, We had an issue when we add a new virtual instance by template.we can not create the new instance. We use cloudstack 4.4.1 + Vmware ,advanced network ,local storage. We want to add a new virtual instance into a share network. Message: File upload task failed to complete due to: Error writing request body to server -- 2015-01-09 23:30:14,876 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.RemoteHostEndPoint] (Timer-11:ctx-a09c3aac) Sending command org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadProgressCommand to host: 3 2015-01-09 23:30:14,878 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Timer-11:ctx-a09c3aac) Seq 3-1751055830117010306: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 52230225403, via: 3(s-1-VM), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadProgressCommand:{jobId :b7835acd-50af-44e7-a91c-94b715722bfc,request:GET_STATUS,hvm:false ,description:CentOS 5.3(64-bit) no GUI (vSphere),checksum:f6f881b7f2292948d8494db837fe0f47,maxDownloadSizeI nBytes:53687091200,id:7,resourceType:TEMPLATE,installPath:templa te/tmpl/1/7,_store:{com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO:{_url:nfs://192.1 68.10.2/secondary,_role:Image}},url:http://download.cloud.com/rele ases/2.2.0/CentOS5.3-x86_64.ova,format:OVA,accountId:1,name:cent os53-x64,secUrl:nfs://192.168.10.2/secondary,wait:0}}] } 2015-01-09 23:30:14,923 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (AgentManager-Handler-11:null) Seq 3-1751055830117010306: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52230225403, via: 3, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, [{com.cloud.agent.api.storage.DownloadAnswer:{jobId:b7835acd-50af-44e 7-a91c-94b715722bfc,downloadPct:0,errorString: ,downloadStatus:DOWNLOAD_IN_PROGRESS,downloadPath:/mnt/SecStorage/ 19e03beb-309a-3316-8e6d-5f25071372e5/template/tmpl/1/7/dnld504376175065878 7860tmp_,installPath:template/tmpl/1/7,templateSize:0,templatePhyS icalSize:0,checkSum:f6f881b7f2292948d8494db837fe0f47,result:true,d etails: ,wait:0}}] } 2015-01-09 23:30:15,780 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-23:ctx-6e8835bf) ===START=== 192.168.255.102 -- GET command=queryAsyncJobResultjobId=dde8c83e-63fc-4b49-b70d-27b3faca7883res ponse=jsonsessionkey=SST2qsGww2SbQBYEsnO7%2BoMlQWU%3D_=1420788674854 2015-01-09 23:30:15,841 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-23:ctx-6e8835bf ctx-35fa8112) ===END=== 192.168.255.102 -- GET command=queryAsyncJobResultjobId=dde8c83e-63fc-4b49-b70d-27b3faca7883res ponse=jsonsessionkey=SST2qsGww2SbQBYEsnO7%2BoMlQWU%3D_=1420788674854 2015-01-09 23:30:16,170 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.d.VmWorkJobDaoImpl] (Vm-Operations-Cleanup-1:ctx-86237200) Expunge completed work job-205 2015-01-09 23:30:18,022 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (AgentManager-Handler-3:null) Seq 3-1751055830117010304: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52230225403, via: 3, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, [{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer:{result:false,d etails:Unable to copy template to primary storage due to exception:Exception: java.lang.Exception\nMessage: File upload task failed to complete due to: Error writing request body to server\n,wait:0}}] } 2015-01-09 23:30:18,022 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Work-Job-Executor-92:ctx-cf7cb5f7 job-206/job-207 ctx-be9a377b) Seq 3-1751055830117010304: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52230225403, via: 3, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { CopyCmdAnswer } } 2015-01-09 23:30:18,047 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-2:null) SeqA 2-22712: Processing Seq 2-22712: { Cmd , MgmtId: -1, via: 2, Ver: v1, Flags: 11, [{com.cloud.agent.api.ConsoleProxyLoadReportCommand:{_proxyVmId:2,_lo adInfo:{\n \connections\: []\n},wait:0}}] } 2015-01-09 23:30:18,116 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-2:null) SeqA 2-22712: Sending Seq 2-22712: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52230225403, via: 2, Ver: v1, Flags: 100010, [{com.cloud.agent.api.AgentControlAnswer:{result:true,wait:0}}] } 2015-01-09 23:30:18,150 INFO [o.a.c.s.v.VolumeServiceImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-92:ctx-cf7cb5f7 job-206/job-207 ctx-be9a377b) releasing lock for VMTemplateStoragePool 19 2015-01-09 23:30:18,151 WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (Work-Job-Executor-92:ctx-cf7cb5f7 job-206/job-207 ctx-be9a377b) Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref19 and thread id 1216625438 2015-01-09 23:30:18,151 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.VolumeOrchestrator] (Work-Job-Executor-92:ctx-cf7cb5f7 job-206/job-207 ctx-be9a377b) Unable to create Vol[32|vm=27|ROOT]:Unable to copy template to primary storage due to exception:Exception: java.lang.Exception Message: File upload task failed to complete due to: Error writing request body to server 2015-01-09 23:30:18,151 INFO [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-92:ctx-cf7cb5f7 job-206/job-207 ctx-be9a377b) Unable to contact resource. com.cloud.exception.StorageUnavailableException: Resource
Re: Cancel hung jobs
Restart MS should work . If you don¹t want to restart clean it manually from db , it seems because of one unfinished job , other jobs is also pending . On 1/6/15, 4:09 AM, Francois Gaudreault fgaudrea...@cloudops.com wrote: These are 60min and 1440min for standard jobs and 600sec for vm related jobs right? I have tasks that are from dec 27 still in there and these are vm jobs. FG On Jan 5, 2015 5:25 PM, Motty Cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Francois, you can change timeout default settings in global settings, if you have not done so. Thanks, Motty On 01/05/2015 02:09 PM, Francois Gaudreault wrote: Yes. And also tons of job in the async_job table with status 0. FG On 2015-01-05 4:54 PM, ilya musayev wrote: Do you see something along the lines of below? please provide the complete error message. (1434,VmWorkJobQueue, 2471) is reaching concurrency limit 1 (1475,VmWorkJobQueue, 2483) is reaching concurrency limit 1 (1477,VmWorkJobQueue, 2484) is reaching concurrency limit 1 (1478,VmWorkJobQueue, 596) is reaching concurrency limit 1 (981,VmWorkJobQueue, 2371) is reaching concurrency limit 1 On 1/5/15, 1:40 PM, Francois Gaudreault wrote: Hi folks, What would be the best way to cancel jobs that are stuck? I was expecting them to timeout, but for some reasons they are not. Thanks.
Re: Unable to add primary storage (SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_73NFS mount error [opterr=mount failed with return code 32])
1. Make sure you have 'no_root_squash' in your /etc/exports 2. Make sure you have your portmap listening on all interface. 3. Make sure you have NFS4 specifically turned off. 4. Lastly, make sure iptables allows NFS related ports. You can disable the firewall for time being until you can add the NFS SR. Hope this help. On 1/6/15, 9:40 PM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote: Can you try with *async* instead? If it still fails, check SMlog to see if there are more details why the mount is failing when creating the SR. -Original Message- From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 7:44 AM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Unable to add primary storage (SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_73NFS mount error [opterr=mount failed with return code 32]) Hi Prashant, /etc/export file content is given below /mnt/data/VM-TT/primary *(rw,sync,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check) Still problem persist. I have Ubuntu 12.04 Server acting as NFS-Server. Regards, Tejas On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Prashant Kumar Mishra prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com wrote: It seems issue with remote mounting ,similar issue seen http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-api/2012-05/msg00191.html ,mentioned solution should work in your case also Thanks prashant On 1/6/15, 11:39 AM, Tejas Gadaria refond.g...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Suresh, I was able to mount NFS on XS host through CLI mount.nfs4 successfully. Also vhd-utils was present on Management server and XS host also. Still facing same issue. Regards, Tejas On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Suresh Sadhu suresh.sa...@citrix.com wrote: Hope you have already copied vhd-util in to the host and also as Somesh suggested try manually mounting the storage directly from the host. Regards Sadhu -Original Message- From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] Sent: 05 January 2015 20:16 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Unable to add primary storage (SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_73NFS mount error [opterr=mount failed with return code 32]) XS is unable to create the SR failing with the following error: --- Caused by: SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_73NFS mount error [opterr=mount failed with return code 32] --- May be a problem with the NFS. Can you try manually creating a SR on XS using this NFS or may be simply try to mount the NFS on XS and see if that works. -Original Message- From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 9:26 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Unable to add primary storage (SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_73NFS mount error [opterr=mount failed with return code 32]) Hi, I am facing issue with xenserver 6.2 SP1, on ACS 4.3.1 and 4.4 both. While creating Zone with NFS as primary secondary storage 2015-01-05 19:29:45,715 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-23cfb66b) Seq 1-3875347479352311816: Executing request 2015-01-05 19:29:47,079 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-23cfb66b) Catch Exception com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException, create StoragePool failed due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to create NFS SR Pool[1|192.168.161.110:2049|/mnt/data/VMS-TT/primary] on host:ba237c07-71cb-48a8-8a6d-6e6c3aff65b2 pool: 192.168.161.110/mnt/data/VMS-TT/primary com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to create NFS SR Pool[1|192.168.161.110:2049|/mnt/data/VMS-TT/primary] at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.getNfsSR(CitrixRes ou rceBase.java:6133) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixReso ur ceBase.java:5074) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(Cit ri xResourceBase.java:475) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(Xe nS erver56Resource.java:61) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(X en Server610Resource.java:102) at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgen tA ttache.java:307) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(Mana ge dContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call (D efaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWi th Context(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWit hC ontext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(Manage dC ontextRunnable.java:46) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471
Re: remove host from Cloudstack Clouster XenServer 6.2
If host is in maintenance mode and you are not seeing Œx¹ option try with deleteHost api . On 1/7/15, 5:01 AM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote: When you put the host in maintenance, it does not always enter maintenance mode, sometimes it is stuck in PrepareMaintenance mode. So you might try it again and make sure the status is Maintenance. At that point, you might also want to do a screen refresh just in case the UI was behaving funny. -Original Message- From: Motty Cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 6:20 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: remove host from Cloudstack Clouster XenServer 6.2 I had it in maintenance mode for a while, I took it out and remove it from pool in XenCenter. I never saw the X to remove it gracefully from Cluster. at this moment status is set to Disconnected Thanks, Motty On 01/06/2015 03:16 PM, Somesh Naidu wrote: It should show you a X button to remove the host. Have you checked if the host has indeed entered the maintenance mode? What does the status of the host show as? -Original Message- From: Motty Cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 5:52 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: remove host from Cloudstack Clouster XenServer 6.2 Hello All, I would like to gracefully remove XenServer host from Cloudstack Cluster, I can't find the steps to do so. I set the server in maintenance mode but there are no options to remove it. perhaps a novice question, am using Cloudstack 4.4.1 Thanks, Motty
Re: Unable to add primary storage (SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_73NFS mount error [opterr=mount failed with return code 32])
It seems issue with remote mounting ,similar issue seen http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-api/2012-05/msg00191.html ,mentioned solution should work in your case also Thanks prashant On 1/6/15, 11:39 AM, Tejas Gadaria refond.g...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Suresh, I was able to mount NFS on XS host through CLI mount.nfs4 successfully. Also vhd-utils was present on Management server and XS host also. Still facing same issue. Regards, Tejas On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Suresh Sadhu suresh.sa...@citrix.com wrote: Hope you have already copied vhd-util in to the host and also as Somesh suggested try manually mounting the storage directly from the host. Regards Sadhu -Original Message- From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] Sent: 05 January 2015 20:16 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Unable to add primary storage (SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_73NFS mount error [opterr=mount failed with return code 32]) XS is unable to create the SR failing with the following error: --- Caused by: SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_73NFS mount error [opterr=mount failed with return code 32] --- May be a problem with the NFS. Can you try manually creating a SR on XS using this NFS or may be simply try to mount the NFS on XS and see if that works. -Original Message- From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 9:26 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Unable to add primary storage (SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_73NFS mount error [opterr=mount failed with return code 32]) Hi, I am facing issue with xenserver 6.2 SP1, on ACS 4.3.1 and 4.4 both. While creating Zone with NFS as primary secondary storage 2015-01-05 19:29:45,715 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-23cfb66b) Seq 1-3875347479352311816: Executing request 2015-01-05 19:29:47,079 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-23cfb66b) Catch Exception com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException, create StoragePool failed due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to create NFS SR Pool[1|192.168.161.110:2049|/mnt/data/VMS-TT/primary] on host:ba237c07-71cb-48a8-8a6d-6e6c3aff65b2 pool: 192.168.161.110/mnt/data/VMS-TT/primary com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to create NFS SR Pool[1|192.168.161.110:2049|/mnt/data/VMS-TT/primary] at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.getNfsSR(CitrixResou rceBase.java:6133) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResour ceBase.java:5074) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(Citri xResourceBase.java:475) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenS erver56Resource.java:61) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(Xen Server610Resource.java:102) at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentA ttache.java:307) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(Manage dContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(D efaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWith Context(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithC ontext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedC ontextRunnable.java:46) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.acce ss$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run( ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:292) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java :1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.jav a:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) Caused by: SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_73NFS mount error [opterr=mount failed with return code 32] at com.xensource.xenapi.Types.checkResponse(Types.java:2006) at com.xensource.xenapi.Connection.dispatch(Connection.java:350) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServerConnectionPool$XenServerConnec tion.dispatch(XenServerConnectionPool.java:456) at com.xensource.xenapi.SR.create(SR.java:801) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.getNfsSR(CitrixResou rceBase.java:6129) ... 17 more 2015-01-05 19:29:47,080 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-23cfb66b) Seq 1-3875347479352311816: Response Received: 2015-01-05 19:29:47,080 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-23cfb66b) Seq 1-3875347479352311816: Response
Re: Can't create or deploy VMs
For now you can set ³pool.storage.capacity.disablethreshold² to 1 in global settings , and restart ms . Insufficient space on pool: 1 since its usage percentage: 0.9072490225390984 has crossed the pool.storage.capacity.disablethreshold: 0.85 On 12/31/14, 11:19 PM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote: 2014-12-31 07:49:44,405 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-22:ctx-f2bc1611 ctx-77cccfb5) No suitable pools found 2014-12-31 07:49:44,405 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-22:ctx-f2bc1611 ctx-77cccfb5) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster: 1 2014-12-31 07:49:44,407 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-22:ctx-f2bc1611 ctx-77cccfb5) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination for this VM under any clusters, returning. Apparently, you only have 1 cluster in Zone 1 where the VM is being deployed and the storage on that one is full. You need to provision more space. -Original Message- From: José Egas López [mailto:josee...@farmaenlace.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 8:18 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Can't create or deploy VMs The log on mgmt is: *** 2014-12-31 07:49:44,138 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-2:ctx-de733770) ===START=== 172.30.1.107 -- GET command=deployVirtualMachineresponse=jsonsessionkey=ExqHTfNe1JVXnQXRkEpg jMoDqu0%3Dzoneid=80b7c240-9204-43eb-85c8-762c7d7f6a15templateid=449e3489 -292e-4888-9682-d57d58a0ea1ahypervisor=VMwareserviceofferingid=a6e438f6- afce-4388-9498-78cf2525cac2diskofferingid=3df3bee2-bdee-4b80-9a0b-5ef039c 5194cdisplayname=testname=test_=1420030300055 2014-12-31 07:49:44,150 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiDispatcher] (catalina-exec-2:ctx-de733770 ctx-77cccfb5) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.ServiceOffering 2014-12-31 07:49:44,153 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiDispatcher] (catalina-exec-2:ctx-de733770 ctx-77cccfb5) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.template.VirtualMachineTemplate 2014-12-31 07:49:44,158 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiDispatcher] (catalina-exec-2:ctx-de733770 ctx-77cccfb5) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.DiskOffering 2014-12-31 07:49:44,190 DEBUG [c.c.v.UserVmManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-2:ctx-de733770 ctx-77cccfb5) Allocating in the DB for vm 2014-12-31 07:49:44,219 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-2:ctx-de733770 ctx-77cccfb5) Allocating entries for VM: VM[User|test] 2014-12-31 07:49:44,221 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-2:ctx-de733770 ctx-77cccfb5) Allocating nics for VM[User|test] 2014-12-31 07:49:44,222 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator] (catalina-exec-2:ctx-de733770 ctx-77cccfb5) Allocating nic for vm VM[User|test] in network Ntwk[204|Guest|6] with requested profile NicProfile[0-0-null-null-null 2014-12-31 07:49:44,233 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-2:ctx-de733770 ctx-77cccfb5) Allocating disks for VM[User|test] 2014-12-31 07:49:44,244 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-2:ctx-de733770 ctx-77cccfb5) Allocation completed for VM: VM[User|test] 2014-12-31 07:49:44,244 DEBUG [c.c.v.UserVmManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-2:ctx-de733770 ctx-77cccfb5) Successfully allocated DB entry for VM[User|test] 2014-12-31 07:49:44,296 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-2:ctx-de733770 ctx-77cccfb5) submit async job-419, details: AsyncJobVO {id:419, userId: 2, accountId: 2, instanceType: VirtualMachine, instanceId: 47, cmd: org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DeployVMCmd, cmdInfo: {serviceofferingid:a6e438f6-afce-4388-9498-78cf2525cac2,sessionkey: ExqHTfNe1JVXnQXRkEpgjMoDqu0\u003d,cmdEventType:VM.CREATE,ctxUserId: 2,zoneid:80b7c240-9204-43eb-85c8-762c7d7f6a15,httpmethod:GET,te mplateid:449e3489-292e-4888-9682-d57d58a0ea1a,response:json,id:4 7,hypervisor:VMware,name:test,_:1420030300055,ctxAccountId: 2,diskofferingid:3df3bee2-bdee-4b80-9a0b-5ef039c5194c,ctxStartEvent Id:1099,displayname:test}, cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid: 345050676845, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created: null} 2014-12-31 07:49:44,297 INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor] (Job-Executor-22:ctx-f2bc1611) Add job-419 into job monitoring 2014-12-31 07:49:44,297 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-2:ctx-de733770 ctx-77cccfb5) ===END=== 172.30.1.107 -- GET command=deployVirtualMachineresponse=jsonsessionkey=ExqHTfNe1JVXnQXRkEpg jMoDqu0%3Dzoneid=80b7c240-9204-43eb-85c8-762c7d7f6a15templateid=449e3489 -292e-4888-9682-d57d58a0ea1ahypervisor=VMwareserviceofferingid=a6e438f6- afce-4388-9498-78cf2525cac2diskofferingid=3df3bee2-bdee-4b80-9a0b-5ef039c 5194cdisplayname=testname=test_=1420030300055 2014-12-31 07:49:44,297 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-22:ctx-f2bc1611) Executing AsyncJobVO {id:419, userId: 2, accountId: 2, instanceType: VirtualMachine, instanceId: 47, cmd: org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DeployVMCmd, cmdInfo:
Re: Can't download ISO's can't setup Templates
System vms are must for download/upload and deploy vm , make sure they are up . You can check cwiki for troubleshooting . Thanks prashant On 12/19/14, 9:11 AM, Mohamed Infaz infaz...@cse.mrt.ac.lk wrote: Hi All, Finally i have successfully added a host in to the management server. Now to create and instance i am unable to download an ISO image. When i click on the sample iso images which is CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM). It shows that it is not ready and i also don't see the download status what could be the issue. I did correctly setup my primary and secondary storages. But i dont have a system vm! is it must to run a system vm? And why can't i download and iSO image and set up an instance. Thank you.
RE: unable to test Network Throttling.
Please check this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2820 Thanks Prashant -Original Message- From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 2:37 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: unable to test Network Throttling. Hi Rajashekar, i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate. Can you please explain what is the issue you are facing while testing. Is it not working as the value configured ? Network throttling is for egress traffic. In configuration it is Mbits/s but in hypervisor it is configured as MBytes/s. 1024 Mb/s is 128MB. Thanks, Jayapal On 10-Dec-2014, at 2:15 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: I also examinded KVM thortling, and got 1/4 of the settings cloudstack always starts VM with same parameters, no matter what you configure manually on KVM/Xen.. On 10 December 2014 at 08:27, raja sekhar rajsekhar@gmail.com wrote: hi prasanth, In cloudstack i have given network rate as 1024Mb/s but in xencenter qos properties it is showing 25Mb/s for that VM. Andrija Panic/Prashant if i change the interface property(bandwidth) through xencenter or commandline process in http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces .html , if i shutdown the VM from cloudstack that VM wil be disabled from xencenter, when ever i start the VM, the qos value will be same or it will changed to 25Mb/s. waiting for your reply. Regards, Rajasekhar. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Prashant Kumar Mishra prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com wrote: From the xencenter you can check interface property (look for QoS settings) for that particular vm . -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:30 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling. Recent reply from Vadim: http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces .html On 9 December 2014 at 08:40, raja sekhar rajsekhar@gmail.com wrote: Hi Star, Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1. how can i check the band width rate of the VM, is there any command for xenserver host? waiting for your reply. Regards, Rajasekhar. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Star Guo st...@ceph.me wrote: Hi, There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering the network rate of global configuration. If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of the VM and focus on interface ... /interface. Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2014年12月9日 14:28 收件人: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org 主题: unable to test Network Throttling. Hi all, i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the Network Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute offering and in global settings i didn't changed any Network Throttling Rate(default 200 Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate. please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM. Regards, Rajasekhar. -- Andrija Panić -- Andrija Panić
RE: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.
From the xencenter you can check interface property (look for QoS settings) for that particular vm . -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:30 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling. Recent reply from Vadim: http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces.html On 9 December 2014 at 08:40, raja sekhar rajsekhar@gmail.com wrote: Hi Star, Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1. how can i check the band width rate of the VM, is there any command for xenserver host? waiting for your reply. Regards, Rajasekhar. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Star Guo st...@ceph.me wrote: Hi, There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering the network rate of global configuration. If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of the VM and focus on interface ... /interface. Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2014年12月9日 14:28 收件人: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org 主题: unable to test Network Throttling. Hi all, i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the Network Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute offering and in global settings i didn't changed any Network Throttling Rate(default 200 Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate. please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM. Regards, Rajasekhar. -- Andrija Panić
RE: Secondary storage problem
Can you provide more logs , was Copycmd successful ? -Original Message- From: Garith Dugmore [mailto:gar...@saao.ac.za] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 3:10 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Secondary storage problem Hi, Could it be secstorage.allowed.internal.sites in Global Settings? I ran into this a while back. Cheers, - Original Message - From: MOULOUD BOUKROUT m.boukr...@afdb.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 8:50:10 AM Subject: Secondary storage problem Hi Users. I’m having this issue where the secondary storage cannot be accessed, please help if you have any idea com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-2-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1 at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachine ManagerImpl.java:947) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachine ManagerImpl.java:5195) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor207.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccess orImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerPro xy.java:107) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineM anagerImpl.java:5340) at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInC ontext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:503) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(Man agedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.cal l(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callW ithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWi thContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(Manag edContextRunnable.java:46) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(As yncJobManagerImpl.java:460) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471 ) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.j ava:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor. java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) 2014-11-11 08:39:08,862 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-22:ctx-f389f2da job-2200/job-2223) Complete async job-2223, jobStatus: FAILED, resultCode: 0, result: rO0ABXNyABpqYXZhLmxhbmcuUnVudGltZUV4Y2VwdGlvbp5fBkcKNIPlAgAAeHIAE2phdm EubGFuZy5FeGNlcHRpb27Q_R8-GjscxAIAAHhyABNqYXZhLmxhbmcuVGhyb3dhYmxl1cY1 Jzl3uMsDAARMAAVjYXVzZXQAFUxqYXZhL2xhbmcvVGhyb3dhYmxlO0wADWRldGFpbE1lc3 NhZ2V0ABJMamF2YS9sYW5nL1N0cmluZztbAApzdGFja1RyYWNldAAeW0xqYXZhL2xhbmcv U3RhY2tUcmFjZUVsZW1lbnQ7TAAUc3VwcHJlc3NlZEV4Y2VwdGlvbnN0ABBMamF2YS91dG lsL0xpc3Q7eHBxAH4AB3QAVUpvYiBmYWlsZWQgZHVlIHRvIGV4Y2VwdGlvbiBVbmFibGUg dG8gY3JlYXRlIGEgZGVwbG95bWVudCBmb3IgVk1bQ29uc29sZVByb3h5fHYtMi1WTV11cg AeW0xqYXZhLmxhbmcuU3RhY2tUcmFjZUVsZW1lbnQ7AkYqPDz9IjkCAAB4cA1zcgAb amF2YS5sYW5nLlN0YWNrVHJhY2VFbGVtZW50YQnFmiY23YUCAARJAApsaW5lTnVtYmVyTA AOZGVjbGFyaW5nQ2xhc3NxAH4ABEwACGZpbGVOYW1lcQB-AARMAAptZXRob2ROYW1lcQB- AAR4cHJ0ACBjb20uY2xvdWQudm0uVm1Xb3JrSm9iRGlzcGF0Y2hlcnQAGFZtV29ya0 pvYkRpc3BhdGNoZXIuamF2 YXQABnJ1bkpvYnNxAH4ACwAAAfd0AD9vcmcuYXBhY2hlLmNsb3Vkc3RhY2suZnJhbWV3b3 JrLmpvYnMuaW1wbC5Bc3luY0pvYk1hbmFnZXJJbXBsJDV0ABhBc3luY0pvYk1hbmFnZXJJ bXBsLmphdmF0AAxydW5JbkNvbnRleHRzcQB-AAsxdAA-b3JnLmFwYWNoZS5jbG91ZH N0YWNrLm1hbmFnZWQuY29udGV4dC5NYW5hZ2VkQ29udGV4dFJ1bm5hYmxlJDF0ABtNYW5h Z2VkQ29udGV4dFJ1bm5hYmxlLmphdmF0AANydW5zcQB-AAs4dABCb3JnLmFwYWNoZS 5jbG91ZHN0YWNrLm1hbmFnZWQuY29udGV4dC5pbXBsLkRlZmF1bHRNYW5hZ2VkQ29udGV4 dCQxdAAaRGVmYXVsdE1hbmFnZWRDb250ZXh0LmphdmF0AARjYWxsc3EAfgALZ3QAQG 9yZy5hcGFjaGUuY2xvdWRzdGFjay5tYW5hZ2VkLmNvbnRleHQuaW1wbC5EZWZhdWx0TWFu YWdlZENvbnRleHRxAH4AGnQAD2NhbGxXaXRoQ29udGV4dHNxAH4ACwAAADVxAH4AHXEAfg AadAAOcnVuV2l0aENvbnRleHRzcQB-AAsudAA8b3JnLmFwYWNoZS5jbG91ZHN0YWNr Lm1hbmFnZWQuY29udGV4dC5NYW5hZ2VkQ29udGV4dFJ1bm5hYmxlcQB-ABZxAH4AF3NxAH 4ACwAAAcxxAH4AEXEAfgAScQB-ABdzcQB-AAsAAAHXdAAuamF2YS51dGlsLmNvbmN1cnJl bnQuRXhlY3V0b3JzJFJ1bm5hYmxlQWRhcHRlcnQADkV4ZWN1dG9ycy5qYXZhcQB-ABtzcQ B-AAsAAAEGdAAfamF2YS51dGlsLmNvbmN1cnJlbnQuRnV0dXJlVGFza3QAD0Z1dHVyZVRh c2suamF2YXEAfgAXc 3EAfgALAAAEeXQAJ2phdmEudXRpbC5jb25jdXJyZW50LlRocmVhZFBvb2xFeGVjdXRvcnQ AF1RocmVhZFBvb2xFeGVjdXRvci5qYXZhdAAJcnVuV29ya2Vyc3EAfgALAAACZ3QALmphd mEudXRpbC5jb25jdXJyZW50LlRocmVhZFBvb2xFeGVjdXRvciRXb3JrZXJxAH4ALHEAfgA Xc3EAfgALAAAC6XQAEGphdmEubGFuZy5UaHJlYWR0AAtUaHJlYWQuamF2YXEAfgAXc3IAJ
RE: Primary Storage Allocated over 100% ?!
Hi, --It looks like our 2 primary storage pools disk_used_capacity are not reporting the right value. VMware reports then 30% full (same as CloudStack storage value). 1-Can you list volumes for these two storage where removed is null, there should be some larger volume . 2-Try with storage cleanup Global setting Not recommended : 3- For now just try to increase total available storage by setting overprovisioning factor to some high value , total Allocated % should drop by overprovisioning value . Thanks Prashant -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 8:25 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Primary Storage Allocated over 100% ?! Hi Francois, After upping your storage.overprovisioning.factor to 2, and restarted services, have you seen any improvement, if not you may need to do the un-manage / manage Cluster trick to force CloudStack to re-calculate the capacity and allocations etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: François Bousquet [mailto:francois.bousq...@radialpoint.com] Sent: 22 August 2014 15:46 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Primary Storage Allocated over 100% ?! This installation is 4.2.1 and was never upgraded. Now, we have set storage.overprovisioning.factor=2 in the global parameters, but I do not see an storage overprovisioning factor at the cluster level. I only see the one for memory and cpu. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 08:29 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Primary Storage Allocated over 100% ?! Hi Francois, Have you updated to 4.2.1 recently? 4.2.1 introduced a lot of the features for 4.3, one of which was the addition of 'storage.overprovisioning.factor' to each Cluster, where previously it was only a Global Settings The update resets the Global Setting 'storage.overprovisioning.factor' to 1, then sets the same value on each Cluster, even if previously it was set to a higher figure. This value directly affects the allocated calculation and is vital if using NFS which automatically thin provisions. Please confirm what you current value is, at both Global and Cluster lever, and if it is 1, suggest you set it to 4, then restart you cloudstack-management service on all management servers. We dealt with a similar issue recently via our CloudStack Support offering, and I recall we also had to 'un-manage' then 're-manage' each Cluster for the new value to take effect. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com] Sent: 22 August 2014 12:57 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Primary Storage Allocated over 100% ?! Hi Francois, Could it be possible after a certain period metric inside cloudstack get updated to match available resources? I'm wondering if it could be because of global settings like this one: storage.stats.interval The interval (in milliseconds) when storage stats (per host) are retrieved from agents. default=6 Pierre-Luc On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 6:53 AM, François Bousquet francois.bousq...@radialpoint.com wrote: That may explain how I get there, but do you have a suggestion how to fix this issue if I can't find any volume big enough to justify all that allocated space? The sum of all the volumes is much lower than my 189% (15TB/8TB) primary allocated storage. I'm kind if stuck right now, not being able to fix the situation. On Aug 22, 2014, at 0:33, Prashant Kumar Mishra prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com wrote: Similar issue seen because of disk resize https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6797 . Thanks prashant -Original Message- From: François Bousquet [mailto:francois.bousq...@radialpoint.com] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 7:27 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Primary Storage Allocated over 100% ?! Hello, We do have a strange problem with our Primary Storage Allocated. It is now at 189%! (Storage is at 30%). So we cannot deploy anymore, because of the pool.storage.allocated.capacity.disabledthreshold=0.85 CloudStack version is 4.2.1 Hypervisor is VMware ESXi 5.1 with 2 x 2 TB VMFS volume in cluster storage.overprovisioning.factor=2 If we do a list capacity, the capacitytotal for Primary Storage Allocated (type=3) looks fine at 8 TB (8795019280384) but the capacityused value totally doesn’t make sense. We don’t know how this happened or how to fix it. In order to prove my point I did the sum of all volumes ready/destroy (we do not have snapshots) and the total is a little more than 4 TB (see SQL query below
RE: How to change primary storage
For error like The storage pool will not be used but cleanup is needed you should check global settings global.clenup.interaval ,For quick cleanup you can set it to 300ms and check parameter related to cleanup like storage.template.cleanup.enable , storage cleanup enabled etc. If global settings are properly tuned I don't think any database modifications required -cloud.volume stores volumes information , if you are not able to delete storage becausevolume still exist on the storage change the volume state and delete. - storage_pool, storage_pool_view for primary storage Thanks Prashant -Original Message- From: Giri Prasad [mailto:g_p...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 10:00 AM To: Prashant Kumar Mishra; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: How to change primary storage Hello, Thanks for suggestion, which I will try. Btw, I saw a lead as: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.cloudstack.user/7000 Which says : when I've had issues deleting primary storages in the past, I've ended up having to delete volumes that were still associated with the datastore from the cloud.volumes table. Is cloud.volumes the mysql table, where all the primary/secondary storage setups are stored? Or what is the exact db.tablename which stores the primary/secondary storage setups? Regards, D.Giriprasad - Original Message - From: Prashant Kumar Mishra prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Giri Prasad g_p...@yahoo.com; users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Sent: Sunday, 6 July 2014 9:42 AM Subject: RE: How to change primary storage I would suggest add you new primary storage ,migrate volumes from old storage to new storage and then remove ur old primary storage after enabling maintenance mode. Thanks Prashant -Original Message- From: Giri Prasad [mailto:g_p...@yahoo.com.INVALID] Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 10:16 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: How to change primary storage Hello All, I installed CS 4.1 on ubuntu, with primary storage in /export/aa and secondary storage in /export/bb, both in the same hard disk as the management server of CS 4.1. The Ip of the server is http://XXX.XXX.1.5. Recently, I configured the My Book Live Device, to the IP of http://XXX.XXX.1.20. I am able to mount this device to linux dir and view files on it. The CS 4.1 was installed before mounting this external My Book Live Device. Now I want to change the primary storage of the IP address from http://XXX.XXX.1.5 to http://XXX.XXX.1.20. Also, I need to change the primary storage directory. Can, anybody provide insights, on which Mysql table, should I update for CS 4.1 setup. Or is there a procedure, to change the primary storage settings via the CS 4.1 web interface gui? Thanks in advance. Regards, D.Giriprasad
RE: How to change primary storage
Manually changing the db can help you but I prefer These steps , can be done without any downtime . 1-add http://XXX.XXX.1.20 with /export/dd 2- migrate volumes from http://XXX.XXX.1.5 to http://XXX.XXX.1.20 3-put http://XXX.XXX.1.5 to maintains mode 4- remove http://XXX.XXX.1.5. thanks -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 10:48 AM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Giri Prasad Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: How to change primary storage You can probably change the host_address field of the storage_pool table to change the IP address of your primary storage. You will probably want to make sure you don't have any (non-deleted) volumes on the storage pool (primary storage) in question, though. As you likely have seen, the volumes table is linked to the storage_pool table via the storage_pool.id and volumes.pool_id fields. It might be easier for you to create new primary storage and migrate your volumes on the old primary storage to the new primary storage. On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Giri Prasad g_p...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Thanks. I want to change the primary storage IP address from http://XXX.XXX.1.5 to http://XXX.XXX.1.20. Also, I need to change the primary storage directory, from /export/aa to /export/dd. What is the procedure? From: Prashant Kumar Mishra prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com To: Giri Prasad g_p...@yahoo.com; d...@cloudstack.apache.org d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 7 July 2014 10:30 AM Subject: RE: How to change primary storage For error like The storage pool will not be used but cleanup is needed you should check global settings global.clenup.interaval ,For quick cleanup you can set it to 300ms and check parameter related to cleanup like storage.template.cleanup.enable , storage cleanup enabled etc. If global settings are properly tuned I don't think any database modifications required -cloud.volume stores volumes information , if you are not able to -delete storage becausevolume still exist on the storage change the volume state and delete. - storage_pool, storage_pool_view for primary storage Thanks Prashant -Original Message- From: Giri Prasad [mailto:g_p...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 10:00 AM To: Prashant Kumar Mishra; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: How to change primary storage Hello, Thanks for suggestion, which I will try. Btw, I saw a lead as: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.cloudstack.user/7000 Which says : when I've had issues deleting primary storages in the past, I've ended up having to delete volumes that were still associated with the datastore from the cloud.volumes table. Is cloud.volumes the mysql table, where all the primary/secondary storage setups are stored? Or what is the exact db.tablename which stores the primary/secondary storage setups? Regards, D.Giriprasad - Original Message - From: Prashant Kumar Mishra prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Giri Prasad g_p...@yahoo.com; users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Sent: Sunday, 6 July 2014 9:42 AM Subject: RE: How to change primary storage I would suggest add you new primary storage ,migrate volumes from old storage to new storage and then remove ur old primary storage after enabling maintenance mode. Thanks Prashant -Original Message- From: Giri Prasad [mailto:g_p...@yahoo.com.INVALID] Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 10:16 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: How to change primary storage Hello All, I installed CS 4.1 on ubuntu, with primary storage in /export/aa and secondary storage in /export/bb, both in the same hard disk as the management server of CS 4.1. The Ip of the server is http://XXX.XXX.1.5. Recently, I configured the My Book Live Device, to the IP of http://XXX.XXX.1.20. I am able to mount this device to linux dir and view files on it. The CS 4.1 was installed before mounting this external My Book Live Device. Now I want to change the primary storage of the IP address from http://XXX.XXX.1.5 to http://XXX.XXX.1.20. Also, I need to change the primary storage directory. Can, anybody provide insights, on which Mysql table, should I update for CS 4.1 setup. Or is there a procedure, to change the primary storage settings via the CS 4.1 web interface gui? Thanks in advance. Regards, D.Giriprasad -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
RE: How to change primary storage
I would suggest add you new primary storage ,migrate volumes from old storage to new storage and then remove ur old primary storage after enabling maintenance mode. Thanks Prashant -Original Message- From: Giri Prasad [mailto:g_p...@yahoo.com.INVALID] Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 10:16 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: How to change primary storage Hello All, I installed CS 4.1 on ubuntu, with primary storage in /export/aa and secondary storage in /export/bb, both in the same hard disk as the management server of CS 4.1. The Ip of the server is http://XXX.XXX.1.5. Recently, I configured the My Book Live Device, to the IP of http://XXX.XXX.1.20. I am able to mount this device to linux dir and view files on it. The CS 4.1 was installed before mounting this external My Book Live Device. Now I want to change the primary storage of the IP address from http://XXX.XXX.1.5 to http://XXX.XXX.1.20. Also, I need to change the primary storage directory. Can, anybody provide insights, on which Mysql table, should I update for CS 4.1 setup. Or is there a procedure, to change the primary storage settings via the CS 4.1 web interface gui? Thanks in advance. Regards, D.Giriprasad
RE: Cloudstack 4.3 KVM CPU overprovisioning
I am giving an example based on my understanding. Data -- Host= 2 cpu ,2.3GHZ Total capacity =2*2.3 GHZ Total allocated: Total capacity assign to vms 1-Without over provisioning you can have total cpu allocated not more than total capacity . 2-With overprovisioning x you can have total allocated x*total capacity , 3-From the Cloudstack point of view If you are able to use total capacity which is more than physical, it is over provisioned. 4-From the kvm Point of view : I guess you are interested in Cloudstack point of view so leaving it Thanks Prashant -Original Message- From: Ivan Rodriguez [mailto:ivan...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 11:55 AM To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Cloudstack 4.3 KVM CPU overprovisioning More information from my previous post, On this particular blade I only have 9 vm's running Total CPU24 x 2.79 GHzCPU Utilized3.9%CPU Allocated for VMs 97%Memory Total126.02 GBMemory Allocated53.50 GB Memory Used36.74 MBNetwork Read35.99 GBNetwork Write [root@cs2-chas1-bl03 ~]# virsh list IdName State 9 i-8-70-VM running 11i-8-75-VM running 14r-93-VMrunning 15i-8-72-VM running 16r-95-VMrunning 17i-3-84-VM running 18i-3-73-VM running 19i-3-91-VM running 28i-4-110-VM running 29i-9-112-VM running 30i-3-128-VM running My service offering is # of CPU Cores4CPU (in MHz)2.00 GHz Where the number of CPU cores varies, I'm wondering if my service offering is incorrect because on the # of cores in my understanding is the number of vcpu's and the speed is lower than the real speed 2,000 Mhz Any ideas will be really appreciate it Below is the virs vcpuinfo VCPU: 0 CPU:12 State: running CPU time: 11802.8s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 1 CPU:12 State: running CPU time: 11317.7s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 0 CPU:2 State: running CPU time: 115618.7s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 1 CPU:2 State: running CPU time: 113330.9s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 0 CPU:4 State: running CPU time: 3928.5s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 1 CPU:0 State: running CPU time: 3459.6s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 2 CPU:14 State: running CPU time: 3429.3s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 3 CPU:12 State: running CPU time: 3808.8s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 4 CPU:0 State: running CPU time: 3506.9s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 5 CPU:2 State: running CPU time: 3695.5s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 6 CPU:21 State: running CPU time: 4199.5s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 7 CPU:0 State: running CPU time: 3633.2s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 0 CPU:2 State: running CPU time: 650355.2s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 1 CPU:14 State: running CPU time: 652099.4s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 2 CPU:6 State: running CPU time: 644120.8s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 3 CPU:1 State: running CPU time: 648950.4s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 0 CPU:12 State: running CPU time: 10297.6s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 1 CPU:0 State: running CPU time: 10297.3s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 0 CPU:1 State: running CPU time: 1815.1s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 1 CPU:1 State: running CPU time: 3389.8s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 0 CPU:1 State: running CPU time: 409.7s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 1 CPU:2 State: running CPU time: 463.9s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 2 CPU:14 State: running CPU time: 602.6s CPU Affinity: VCPU: 3 CPU:14 State:
RE: template download
ssvm stop-start should help thanks prashant -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 2:32 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: template download Hi folks, If a template fails to download (network issues on ssvm) and I then fix my problems. how do I kick off a new attempt at downloading the template ? thanks -sebastien
RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!!
If you are seeing error message like below I mentioned please open a ticket ,If not can you please some relevant logs . Log 2014-02-03 10:07:25,234 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (catalina-exec-16:ctx-fca502c2 ctx-cb0c10a8) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to check for allocation: [Host[-4-Routing]] 2014-02-03 10:07:25,237 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (catalina-exec-16:ctx-fca502c2 ctx-cb0c10a8) Found 1 hosts for allocation after prioritization: [Host[-4-Routing]] 2014-02-03 10:07:25,238 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-16:ctx-fca502c2 ctx-cb0c10a8) unhandled exception executing api command: findHostsForMigration java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.agent.manager.allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator.allocateTo(FirstFitAllocator.java:267) at com.cloud.agent.manager.allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator.allocateTo(FirstFitAllocator.java:238) at com.cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl.listHostsForMigrationOfVM(ManagementServerImpl.java:1195) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150) at org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:91) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172) at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204) at $Proxy210.listHostsForMigrationOfVM(Unknown Source) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.host.FindHostsForMigrationCmd.execute(FindHostsForMigrationCmd.java:75) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:161) -Original Message- From: Amin Samir [mailto:a...@opencloud.net.au] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 2:36 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! Sorry forgot to mention this cloud stack is migrated twice before from 2.2.14 to 4.2.1 then 4.3 if this helps Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Amin Samir Sent: Tuesday, 27 May 2014 5:04 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! Hi Devdeep, Thanks for replying, it is one cluster with 7 hosts, we still have room to migrate this host, in fact other machines created from pre-defined offerings do migrate fine. All hosts are running the same version Xen Server 6.2 SP1, There is no logs the when you click the migrate to host icon it does not pop up, while another vm created from pre-defined offer and from the same browser show the pop up when migrate to host is clicked. Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, 27 May 2014 4:58 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! How many hosts do you have in your setup and how are they distributed across clusters? Are all hosts running the same version of the xenserver hypervisor? Do you see the issue only with custom offering; or is it seen if an instance has been created with any other offering? Anything in the cloudstack logs when you try and list the hosts for migration from the UI? Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Amin Samir [mailto:a...@opencloud.net.au] Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 8:12 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: VM's using custom offerings wont let us use the migrate host from UI !!! Hello, We have cloud stack 4.3 over centos our hypervisors are xen server 6.2 SP1 with latest updates, the VM's that are created from custom offering don't let us use the migrate host icon from the UI, however you can move them from the xen center console. Has anyone faced this issue before? Kind Regards
[QA]Test Case for feature Calculate Storage space correctly when using Thin Provisioning
Hi , I am planning to take feature Calculate Storage space correctly when using Thin Provisioning for testing I have written some test cases which may not be covering all the scenarios, please provide your feedback/suggestion if you see any gaps Issue = https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6092 FS == https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Storage+OverProvisioning+as+Per+Primary+Basis Test Case https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Calculate+Storage+space+correctly+when+using+Thin+Provisioning Thanks Prashant
RE: Console Proxy still not using HTTPS
Can you check Global setting consoleproxy.url.domain value , HTTP will be used if this field is blank . Thanks Prashant -Original Message- From: Владислав Старков [mailto:vladislav.star...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 5:10 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Console Proxy still not using HTTPS Hi, I've install SSL certificate to enable HTTPS for Console Proxy VM, as described on http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/latest/systemvm.html#console-proxy However my Console window still connecting to Console Proxy VM through unencrypted HTTP. The question is, how to force it to use HTTPS? Thanks. -- Vlad
[QA]Test Case for feature VR Service Failure Alerting
Hi , I am planning to take feature VR Service Failure Alerting for testing I have written some test cases which may not be covering all the scenarios, please provide you feedback/suggestion if you see any gaps Issue = https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6090 FS == https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Virtual+Router+Service+Failure+Alerting Test Case https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VR+Service+Failure+Alerting Thanks Prashant
RE: tinyLinux template failed to download - how to get cloudstack to retry?
Restarting ssvm should help. Also you can check allow.internal in global settings ~prashant -Original Message- From: chris snow [mailto:chsnow...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 2:16 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: tinyLinux template failed to download - how to get cloudstack to retry? I have created a script to setup my cloudstack environment from scratch. On previous runs of the script, the tinyLinux template has downloaded ok and becomes available. However, on the most recent run of the script, tinyLinux has failed to download for some reason. Will cloudstack automatically retry the download (it doesn't seem to be), or is there something I can do manually to make cloudstack retry? Many thanks, Chris
RE: Capture messages printed in the VM console
If you want to do it anyway take console's screenshot and then covert it into text or pdf. Thanks prashant -Original Message- From: Anshul Gangwar [mailto:anshul.gang...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 3:33 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Capture messages printed in the VM console Hi Iliyas, The VM console which you see in browser is image. So its not possible to copy text from console. Regards, Anshul -Original Message- From: iliyas shirol [mailto:iliyas.shi...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 3:15 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Capture messages printed in the VM console Hi, Is there any way to copy the messages printed in the console opened for a VM in a browser ? I tried using the US Standard key pairs to copy but it didn't work. Thanks. -- - Md. Iliyas Shirol Mobile : +91 9902 977 800 Google : iliyas.shirol@ gmail.com
RE: XenServer VM live scales the CPU, but not the RAM
Can you share xen server version and logs . -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 8:16 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Dev Subject: Re: XenServer VM live scales the CPU, but not the RAM Hi, Copying dev@, maybe someone has an idea for the below? On 27.01.2014 10:28, Nux! wrote: Hi, I'm testing Xenserver live scale-up feature, and it almost works. I'm using a Centos 6 64bit PV guest and trying to upgrade from an offering of 2 CPU and 512MB RAM to 3 CPU and 1024MB RAM. The CPUs scale up nicely, but not the memory, it only scales from 483 MB (as reported by `free -m`) to 532 MB and in XenCenter the memory is also not what it should: http://img.nux.ro/mK7-vmmem116.png What am I doing wrong? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Database Deployment is failing
Hi , Deploy Db is failing , can someone help me . [root@localhost cloudstack]# mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb Eror msg - Processing upgrade: com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker [WARNING] java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at org.codehaus.mojo.exec.ExecJavaMojo$1.run(ExecJavaMojo.java:297) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) Caused by: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to upgrade the database at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:337) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:432) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseCreator.main(DatabaseCreator.java:222) ... 6 more Caused by: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to execute upgrade script: /root/cloudstack/developer/target/db/db/schema-421to430.sql at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.runScript(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:252) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:306) ... 8 more Caused by: com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Duplicate column name 'is_exclusive_gslb_provider' at com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:193) at com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:87) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.runScript(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:243) ... 9 more [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 35.980s [INFO] Finished at: Mon Jan 06 10:29:36 EST 2014 [INFO] Final Memory: 37M/90M [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema) on project cloud-developer: An exception occured while executing the Java class. null: InvocationTargetException: Unable to upgrade the database: Unable to execute upgrade script: /root/cloudstack/developer/target/db/db/schema-421to430.sql: Duplicate column name 'is_exclusive_gslb_provider' - [Help 1] [ERROR] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch. [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging. [ERROR] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles: [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException Setup Detail - [root@localhost cloudstack]# git branch * master root@localhost cloudstack]# git log --name-status HEAD^..HEAD commit c2b5addaedc47b3715b408a6d5a2aa356e7fcd1b Author: SrikanteswaraRao Talluri tall...@apache.org Date: Mon Jan 6 14:50:46 2014 +0530 CLOUDSTACK-5625: removed unnecessary global setting 'ldap.realname.attribute' M test/integration/component/test_ldap.py Thanks prashant
RE: [Doc] [4.3] Dynamic Compute Offering for Review
Hi, Custom compute offerings can be used in following cases: 1-deploy vm 2-change CO of stop vm 3-change CO of running vms(scaling up) -In doc it is more specific to create vm Custom: If checked, the end-user must fill in the desired values for number of CPU cores, CPU MHz, and Memory when creating a VM based on this offering. When you check this box, those three input fields are hidden in the dialog box. Comments: -we should say end user must provide value for #cpu,cpuspeed and ram whenever he/she is going to use custom compute offering. Thanks prashant -Original Message- From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2013 3:57 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [Doc] [4.3] Dynamic Compute Offering for Review Hi, 4.3 Documentation is getting ready to be reviewed. Please review section Creating Compute Offering, which inludes the changes for the Dynamic Compute offering . The documentation is uploaded at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5604 Regards -Radhika
RE: Dynamic Scaling Of CPU and RAM not working
Hi Shanker , Please check following procedure , Let us know if you require more detail. Scaling up is two-step process 1-While deploying vm CS configure memory-static-min(=memory in compute offering) , memory-static-max(=4*memory-static -min) based on vm current CO . 2-Choos a compute offering and dynamically scale up memory ,memory in CO must be =memory static-max . To support these two steps following required 1-xen server tools in vm 2-xen server license How Cloudstack making sure these things are installed = 1- Dynamically Scalable =yes/No If it is No and u try to scale up u will see following error Unable to Scale the vm: 3e245053-4310-4154-8753-d5fd1015193c as vm does not have tools to support dynamic scaling 2- Enable.dynamic.scale.vm =True/False If it is false and u try to scaleup u will see following error oud.exception.PermissionDeniedException: Dynamically scaling virtual machines is disabled for this zone, please contact your admin If it is true and while scaling up vm you see following error Cannot scale up the vm because of memory constraint violation: 0 = memory-static-min(536870912) = memory-dynamic-min(1073741824) = memory-dynamic-max(1073741824) = memory-static-max(536870912) This is because you may have enabled parameter Enable.dynamic.scale.vm after vm deployment . please stop and start vm ,this action will allow cloudstack to configure memory-static-min and memory static-max on xen server host.on xen host you can check these values by using this command xe vm-list params=all uuid=uuid of vm| grep mem Best practice == 1-Please read the admin guide http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Admin_Guide/changing-service-offering-for-vm.html; 2-Use licensed xen server host. 3- set Enable.dynamic.scale.vm =True. 4-Doply vm using a template which have xen tools installed 5-Go for scaling up. Thanks Prashant -Original Message- From: Shanker Balan [mailto:shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 11:27 AM To: CloudStack-Users Subject: Re: Dynamic Scaling Of CPU and RAM not working On 20-Dec-2013, at 11:13 am, Ryan Lei ryan...@cht.com.tw wrote: By the way, I remember seeing this kind of error message, too. Cannot scale up the vm because of memory constraint violation: 0 = memory-static-min = memory-dynamic-min = memory-dynamic-max = memory-static-max Let me RTFM https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dynamic+scaling+of+CPU+and+RAM also. I didnt do it the first time around. -- @shankerbalan M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, Bangalore - 560 055 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.