+users@ The larger community does not have the infra to help with regression testing of srx plugin related changes. I would reach out to our users list as well and ask if there are any srx users who want to share their thoughts?
Otherwise, we only have Richard and his team's changes and testing effort to rely on and we can help run smoketests to validate any regressions. Thanks. Regards, Rohit Yadav From: Richard Lawley Sent: Wednesday, 26 June, 6:37 PM Subject: Juniper SRX Support in 4.13 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Hi, In the current release, we list CloudStack as supporting Juniper SRX (Model srx100b) versions 10.3 to 10.4 R7.5. As I've mentioned in a previous email, this is very old (EOL 2014). The main thing that causes a problem here is that somewhere between JunOS 10 and 15, Port Forwarding changed from being a single port per rule to a port-range per rule. I'm prepared to modify the SRX plugin so that it works fully with JunOS 15 (I've done some basics), but to fully complete this would require breaking compatibility with older versions. I think given that JunOS 15 is the lowest currently available version, and 19 is also available, it would be better if upped the minimum requirements. In addition, when I asked previously for input from anyone using it, there was only one response (from Jayapal Uradi), so I don't think this is being widely used. We're trying to use SRXs with JunOS 15 (and also testing with vSRX appliances). What are anyone's thoughts on bumping the supported SRX version to 15? Regards, Richard rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue
