Re: Pod VLAN

2013-12-19 Thread Domenico De Monte

  
  
In my case i have to update
also vlan table on CS database because after few minutes/hours,
CS update again VMware port group to original vlan_id.


Regards

  
Il 19/12/2013 16:17, tawfiq zidi ha
  scritto:


  Hi ,

Well I found the Way to resolve this Problem :).

You have to update vmware traffic label with the VLAN number.

Thank you for Help.


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:03 PM, tawfiq zidi  wrote:


  
Thank you for Replying.

I'm using Vmware Esxi 5.0 with vCenter in my installation.

I see that each time a vRouter Create , a control port is Created as:
cloud.private.untagged.0.1-vSwitch

Is it possible to always tag this port with VLAN 20 ?


On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Marty Sweet  wrote:



  Depending on the hypervisor (for example this would work with KVM), you
could still tag management traffic down to each host, just manually
setting
up a network interface (ex. privatebr0) and set the 'KVM Traffic label'
accordingly.
Not sure how effective this would be with other hypervisors.

Example networking on Ubuntu 12.04:
==
iface management0 inet manual
 bond-mode active-backup
 bond-miimon 100
 bond-slaves none
 up /sbin/ifenslave  management0 eth0 eth1
 down /sbin/ifenslave -d management0 eth0 eth1

iface vlan20 inet manual
 vlan-raw-device management0

iface privatebr0 inet static
 bridge_ports vlan20
 bridge_fd 0
 bridge_stp off
 bridge_maxwait -1
 address 172.16.0.12
 netmask 255.255.255.0
==

Marty


On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Ahmad Emneina 
wrote:


  
I believe the management range for a pod has to be untagged. It does

  
  seem

  
like a legacy requirement at this point. You might want to file a

  
  feature

  
enhancement ticket @

  
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa

  


On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:37 AM, tawfiq zidi 
wrote:



  Hi,

Is it possible to tag a specific  VLAN for a POD range ?

*For example a want to tag a VLAN (20) for private addesses
172.16.0.0/24for POD1.

The default installation always gives untagged VLAN.





  
  





  
  



-- 
  
  

  

  
  
  Supernova
  s.r.l.
  Via G. Misiticoni, 3
  65126 - Pescara
  ITALY
  
  
  www.netsons.com


   Domenico
De Monte
CEO 
   
  
  t. (+39)
085 45 100 52
  m. (+39)
339 79 033 98
  e. d.demo...@netsons.com
  
  
 
  

  
  
  
  Netsons® è un marchio registrato dalla Supernova s.r.l.
  
  
  
Le informazioni trasmesse sono riservate alla persona o alla
società indicata come destinatario, e possono includere
contenuti considerati confidenziali. Ogni elaborazione,
comunicazione, trasmissione o altro utilizzo, anche azioni
conseguenti alla conoscenza di queste informazioni da parte di
chiunque non sia espressamente indicato come destinatario è
proibita. Nel caso abbiate ricevuto per errore questa
comunicazione, siete pregati di darne avviso a info [at]
netsons.com ed eliminare ogni stampa ed ogni traccia
informatica. Il ricevente dovrà inoltre accertarsi che gli
eventuali allegati non contengano virus prima di aprirli.
Qualunque opinione o affermazione presentata in questo messaggio
è da ritenersi propria dell'autore e non rappresenta
necessariamente la posizione della Società.


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use
of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact: info
[at] netsons.com and delete the material from any computer. If
this email contains attachments you should ensure they are
checked for viruses before opening them. Any views or opinions
presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of the company.
  

  



Re: Pod VLAN

2013-12-19 Thread tawfiq zidi
Hi ,

Well I found the Way to resolve this Problem :).

You have to update vmware traffic label with the VLAN number.

Thank you for Help.


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:03 PM, tawfiq zidi  wrote:

> Thank you for Replying.
>
> I'm using Vmware Esxi 5.0 with vCenter in my installation.
>
> I see that each time a vRouter Create , a control port is Created as:
> cloud.private.untagged.0.1-vSwitch
>
> Is it possible to always tag this port with VLAN 20 ?
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Marty Sweet  wrote:
>
>> Depending on the hypervisor (for example this would work with KVM), you
>> could still tag management traffic down to each host, just manually
>> setting
>> up a network interface (ex. privatebr0) and set the 'KVM Traffic label'
>> accordingly.
>> Not sure how effective this would be with other hypervisors.
>>
>> Example networking on Ubuntu 12.04:
>> ==
>> iface management0 inet manual
>>  bond-mode active-backup
>>  bond-miimon 100
>>  bond-slaves none
>>  up /sbin/ifenslave  management0 eth0 eth1
>>  down /sbin/ifenslave -d management0 eth0 eth1
>>
>> iface vlan20 inet manual
>>  vlan-raw-device management0
>>
>> iface privatebr0 inet static
>>  bridge_ports vlan20
>>  bridge_fd 0
>>  bridge_stp off
>>  bridge_maxwait -1
>>  address 172.16.0.12
>>  netmask 255.255.255.0
>> ==
>>
>> Marty
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Ahmad Emneina 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I believe the management range for a pod has to be untagged. It does
>> seem
>> > like a legacy requirement at this point. You might want to file a
>> feature
>> > enhancement ticket @
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:37 AM, tawfiq zidi 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Is it possible to tag a specific  VLAN for a POD range ?
>> > >
>> > > *For example a want to tag a VLAN (20) for private addesses
>> > > 172.16.0.0/24for POD1.
>> > >
>> > > The default installation always gives untagged VLAN.
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>


Re: Pod VLAN

2013-12-18 Thread tawfiq zidi
Thank you for Replying.

I'm using Vmware Esxi 5.0 with vCenter in my installation.

I see that each time a vRouter Create , a control port is Created as:
cloud.private.untagged.0.1-vSwitch

Is it possible to always tag this port with VLAN 20 ?


On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Marty Sweet  wrote:

> Depending on the hypervisor (for example this would work with KVM), you
> could still tag management traffic down to each host, just manually setting
> up a network interface (ex. privatebr0) and set the 'KVM Traffic label'
> accordingly.
> Not sure how effective this would be with other hypervisors.
>
> Example networking on Ubuntu 12.04:
> ==
> iface management0 inet manual
>  bond-mode active-backup
>  bond-miimon 100
>  bond-slaves none
>  up /sbin/ifenslave  management0 eth0 eth1
>  down /sbin/ifenslave -d management0 eth0 eth1
>
> iface vlan20 inet manual
>  vlan-raw-device management0
>
> iface privatebr0 inet static
>  bridge_ports vlan20
>  bridge_fd 0
>  bridge_stp off
>  bridge_maxwait -1
>  address 172.16.0.12
>  netmask 255.255.255.0
> ==
>
> Marty
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Ahmad Emneina  wrote:
>
> > I believe the management range for a pod has to be untagged. It does seem
> > like a legacy requirement at this point. You might want to file a feature
> > enhancement ticket @
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:37 AM, tawfiq zidi 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is it possible to tag a specific  VLAN for a POD range ?
> > >
> > > *For example a want to tag a VLAN (20) for private addesses
> > > 172.16.0.0/24for POD1.
> > >
> > > The default installation always gives untagged VLAN.
> > >
> >
>


Re: Pod VLAN

2013-12-15 Thread Marty Sweet
Depending on the hypervisor (for example this would work with KVM), you
could still tag management traffic down to each host, just manually setting
up a network interface (ex. privatebr0) and set the 'KVM Traffic label'
accordingly.
Not sure how effective this would be with other hypervisors.

Example networking on Ubuntu 12.04:
==
iface management0 inet manual
 bond-mode active-backup
 bond-miimon 100
 bond-slaves none
 up /sbin/ifenslave  management0 eth0 eth1
 down /sbin/ifenslave -d management0 eth0 eth1

iface vlan20 inet manual
 vlan-raw-device management0

iface privatebr0 inet static
 bridge_ports vlan20
 bridge_fd 0
 bridge_stp off
 bridge_maxwait -1
 address 172.16.0.12
 netmask 255.255.255.0
==

Marty


On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Ahmad Emneina  wrote:

> I believe the management range for a pod has to be untagged. It does seem
> like a legacy requirement at this point. You might want to file a feature
> enhancement ticket @ https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:37 AM, tawfiq zidi 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it possible to tag a specific  VLAN for a POD range ?
> >
> > *For example a want to tag a VLAN (20) for private addesses
> > 172.16.0.0/24for POD1.
> >
> > The default installation always gives untagged VLAN.
> >
>


Re: Pod VLAN

2013-12-15 Thread Ahmad Emneina
I believe the management range for a pod has to be untagged. It does seem
like a legacy requirement at this point. You might want to file a feature
enhancement ticket @ https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa


On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:37 AM, tawfiq zidi  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to tag a specific  VLAN for a POD range ?
>
> *For example a want to tag a VLAN (20) for private addesses
> 172.16.0.0/24for POD1.
>
> The default installation always gives untagged VLAN.
>