Re: SSVM Creation Failure with Advanced Zone

2016-11-22 Thread Dag Sonstebo
Hi Asai,

Check your agent log – as per my previous email you need to reconsider the 
design of your networking:

com.cloud.exception.InternalErrorException: Failed to create vnet 210: device 
eno2.210 is already a member of a bridge; can't enslave it to bridge 
breno2-210.Failed to add vlan: eno2.210 to breno2-210

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

On 21/11/2016, 21:15, "a...@globalchangemusic.org"  
wrote:

 

Hi, Simon. 

I'm using KVM. 

Here's a sample of the Management Server logs: 

http://pastebin.com/DJvmRfRg 

And Agent logs: 

http://pastebin.com/Cpmm3w5M 

On 2016-11-19 14:55, Simon Weller wrote: 

> Can you post some management server and agent logs?
> 
> What hypervisor are you using?
> 
> Simon Weller/ENA
> (615) 312-6068
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Asai [a...@globalchangemusic.org]
> Received: Saturday, 19 Nov 2016, 12:04PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
> Subject: SSVM Creation Failure with Advanced Zone
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Hopefully I can gain some insight here. When I create a basic zone
> using the wizard, everything goes smoothly and the Secondary Storage
> works great. But--and I know I'm missing something here, I just don't
> know what--when I try to set up an advanced zone I always get this error:
> 
> Secondary Storage Vm creation failure. zone: Av1, error details: null
> 
> Secondary storage seems to be mounting normally now, and is in the same
> subnet as Management server and Pod. I have 1 NIC that's set up to
> support 2 VLANS and does management traffic on its NON VLAN IP. e.g. NIC
> 1 IP is 192.168.100.202 (cloudbr0), NIC 1 Public VLAN is VLAN 210
> (cloudbr1), and NIC 1 Private for guest traffic is VLAN 220 (cloudbr2).
> Again, this setup seems to work OK with a basic zone, but not for 
advanced.
> 
> Can anyone offer any direction?
> 
> Thanks,
> Asai
 


dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 



RE: SSVM Creation Failure with Advanced Zone

2016-11-21 Thread asai
 

Hi, Simon. 

I'm using KVM. 

Here's a sample of the Management Server logs: 

http://pastebin.com/DJvmRfRg 

And Agent logs: 

http://pastebin.com/Cpmm3w5M 

On 2016-11-19 14:55, Simon Weller wrote: 

> Can you post some management server and agent logs?
> 
> What hypervisor are you using?
> 
> Simon Weller/ENA
> (615) 312-6068
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Asai [a...@globalchangemusic.org]
> Received: Saturday, 19 Nov 2016, 12:04PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
> Subject: SSVM Creation Failure with Advanced Zone
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Hopefully I can gain some insight here. When I create a basic zone
> using the wizard, everything goes smoothly and the Secondary Storage
> works great. But--and I know I'm missing something here, I just don't
> know what--when I try to set up an advanced zone I always get this error:
> 
> Secondary Storage Vm creation failure. zone: Av1, error details: null
> 
> Secondary storage seems to be mounting normally now, and is in the same
> subnet as Management server and Pod. I have 1 NIC that's set up to
> support 2 VLANS and does management traffic on its NON VLAN IP. e.g. NIC
> 1 IP is 192.168.100.202 (cloudbr0), NIC 1 Public VLAN is VLAN 210
> (cloudbr1), and NIC 1 Private for guest traffic is VLAN 220 (cloudbr2).
> Again, this setup seems to work OK with a basic zone, but not for advanced.
> 
> Can anyone offer any direction?
> 
> Thanks,
> Asai
 

Re: SSVM Creation Failure with Advanced Zone

2016-11-21 Thread Dag Sonstebo
Hi Asai,

You will have to go back to the drawing board with this one. In a basic zone 
your guest isolation is Layer 3 – in other words all down to network ACLs. In 
that scenario your network configuration may make sense – since you are 
restricting your L3 traffic to single subnets on a single VLAN.

Not so in an advanced zone – my guess is you are aiming for L2 VLAN guest 
isolation? If so you can’t restrict VLANs at the bridge level – since you are 
then asking CloudStack to assign VLANs to a bridge which is already using 
VLAN220. In addition to this your bridge configuration seems a bit over the top.

I would propose you do the following:
- NIC1/eth0 = cloudbr0 (192.168.100.202)
- NIC2/eth1 = cloudbr1 – with *no VLAN assignment*
- Configure you're the top of rack for eth1 to trunk all the VLANs you want to 
utilize – but set the default VLAN to your public VLAN 210.

When you set up your advanced zone you can now tag your management network as 
“cloudbr0” and your guest / public as “cloudbr1” – then specify your private 
VLAN range / public range etc.

Once you’re at this stage you can then start troubleshooting your SSVM – 
suggest you review our previous discussions.

If you want some pointers on the KVM networking have a look at my blog on 
http://www.shapeblue.com/networking-kvm-for-cloudstack/ 

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

On 19/11/2016, 18:04, "Asai"  wrote:

Hello,

Hopefully I can gain some insight here.  When I create a basic zone 
using the wizard, everything goes smoothly and the Secondary Storage 
works great.  But--and I know I'm missing something here, I just don't 
know what--when I try to set up an advanced zone I always get this error:

Secondary Storage Vm creation failure. zone: Av1, error details: null

Secondary storage seems to be mounting normally now, and is in the same 
subnet as Management server and Pod.  I have 1 NIC that's set up to 
support 2 VLANS and does management traffic on its NON VLAN IP. e.g. NIC 
1 IP is 192.168.100.202 (cloudbr0), NIC 1 Public VLAN is VLAN 210 
(cloudbr1), and NIC 1 Private for guest traffic is VLAN 220 (cloudbr2).  
Again, this setup seems to work OK with a basic zone, but not for advanced.

Can anyone offer any direction?

Thanks,
Asai





dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 



RE: SSVM Creation Failure with Advanced Zone

2016-11-19 Thread Simon Weller
Can you post some management server and agent logs?

What hypervisor are you using?

Simon Weller/ENA
(615) 312-6068

-Original Message-
From: Asai [a...@globalchangemusic.org]
Received: Saturday, 19 Nov 2016, 12:04PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: SSVM Creation Failure with Advanced Zone

Hello,

Hopefully I can gain some insight here.  When I create a basic zone
using the wizard, everything goes smoothly and the Secondary Storage
works great.  But--and I know I'm missing something here, I just don't
know what--when I try to set up an advanced zone I always get this error:

Secondary Storage Vm creation failure. zone: Av1, error details: null

Secondary storage seems to be mounting normally now, and is in the same
subnet as Management server and Pod.  I have 1 NIC that's set up to
support 2 VLANS and does management traffic on its NON VLAN IP. e.g. NIC
1 IP is 192.168.100.202 (cloudbr0), NIC 1 Public VLAN is VLAN 210
(cloudbr1), and NIC 1 Private for guest traffic is VLAN 220 (cloudbr2).
Again, this setup seems to work OK with a basic zone, but not for advanced.

Can anyone offer any direction?

Thanks,
Asai




Re: SSVM Creation Failure with Advanced Zone

2016-11-19 Thread Asai
I don't know if it's relevant, but no Virtual Router has been created 
either.



On 2016-11-19 11:04 AM, Asai wrote:
Secondary Storage Vm creation failure. zone: Av1, error details: null 




SSVM Creation Failure with Advanced Zone

2016-11-19 Thread Asai

Hello,

Hopefully I can gain some insight here.  When I create a basic zone 
using the wizard, everything goes smoothly and the Secondary Storage 
works great.  But--and I know I'm missing something here, I just don't 
know what--when I try to set up an advanced zone I always get this error:


Secondary Storage Vm creation failure. zone: Av1, error details: null

Secondary storage seems to be mounting normally now, and is in the same 
subnet as Management server and Pod.  I have 1 NIC that's set up to 
support 2 VLANS and does management traffic on its NON VLAN IP. e.g. NIC 
1 IP is 192.168.100.202 (cloudbr0), NIC 1 Public VLAN is VLAN 210 
(cloudbr1), and NIC 1 Private for guest traffic is VLAN 220 (cloudbr2).  
Again, this setup seems to work OK with a basic zone, but not for advanced.


Can anyone offer any direction?

Thanks,
Asai