Re: [ClusterLabs] Safe way to stop pacemaker on both nodes of a two node cluster
On 10/21/19 12:28 AM, Valentin Vidić wrote: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 09:24:31PM +0530, Dileep V Nair wrote: >> I am confused about the best way to stop pacemaker on both nodes of a >> two node cluster. The options I know of are >> 1. Put the cluster in Maintenance Mode, stop the applications manually and To put the whole cluster in the maintenance node is a reliable approach to shutdown pacemaker gracefully and leave the applications running behind. It fits the use case per the title of this thread. >> then stop pacemaker on both nodes. For this I need the application to be >> stopped manually >> 2. Stop pacemaker on one node, wait for all resources to come up on second >> node, then stop pacemaker on second node. This might cause a significant >> delay because all resources has to come up on second node. >> >> Is there any other way to stop pacemaker on both nodes gracefully ? > > Maybe this pacemaker option can help? > > stop-all-resources FALSE Should the cluster stop all resources? > To shutdown the applications all together with pacemaker, this option is useful. But be caution about stop failure of the application migrate trigger stonith. "stonith-enabled=false" could remove such risk. Cheers, Roger ___ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
Re: [ClusterLabs] Safe way to stop pacemaker on both nodes of a two node cluster
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 09:24:31PM +0530, Dileep V Nair wrote: > I am confused about the best way to stop pacemaker on both nodes of a > two node cluster. The options I know of are > 1. Put the cluster in Maintenance Mode, stop the applications manually and > then stop pacemaker on both nodes. For this I need the application to be > stopped manually > 2. Stop pacemaker on one node, wait for all resources to come up on second > node, then stop pacemaker on second node. This might cause a significant > delay because all resources has to come up on second node. > > Is there any other way to stop pacemaker on both nodes gracefully ? Maybe this pacemaker option can help? stop-all-resources FALSE Should the cluster stop all resources? -- Valentin ___ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
[ClusterLabs] Safe way to stop pacemaker on both nodes of a two node cluster
Hi, I am confused about the best way to stop pacemaker on both nodes of a two node cluster. The options I know of are 1. Put the cluster in Maintenance Mode, stop the applications manually and then stop pacemaker on both nodes. For this I need the application to be stopped manually 2. Stop pacemaker on one node, wait for all resources to come up on second node, then stop pacemaker on second node. This might cause a significant delay because all resources has to come up on second node. Is there any other way to stop pacemaker on both nodes gracefully ? Thanks in advance. Thanks & Regards Dileep Nair Squad Lead - SAP Base Togaf Certified Enterprise Architect IBM Services for Managed Applications +91 98450 22258 Mobile dilen...@in.ibm.com IBM Services ___ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
