You have many options to do that: - lsyncd+csync2/rsync - cron+rsync - glusterfs replicated f's
Lsyncd + csync2 is a good option if you need near to real time replication Cron + rsync is a good option for scheduled replication Glusterfs is good for real time replication For 2+ nodes Regards El mar. 13, 2017 3:30 PM, "Dimitri Maziuk" <dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu> escribió: > On 03/13/2017 12:38 PM, Frank Fiene wrote: > > Hmm, Puppet is also a good idea. Thanks. > > > > I haven’t tried because we have not so many Linux servers. Just a > handful. > > It depends on how much data there is and what the update model is. For > larger datasets zfs incremental snapshots work best IME, although on our > two-node active/passive pairs I haven't had any problems with DRBD > either -- as long as it's not exported via nfs on centos > 7/corosync/pacemaker. > > -- > Dimitri Maziuk > Programmer/sysadmin > BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org > http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org