Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Ordering Sets of Resources

[Ken Gaillot]

On 03/01/2017 01:36 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
 Ken Gaillot  schrieb am 26.02.2017 um 20:04 in 
 Nachricht
> :
>> On 02/25/2017 03:35 PM, iva...@libero.it wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> i have configured a two node cluster on redhat 7.
>>>
>>> Because I need to manage resources stopping and starting singularly when
>>> they are running I have configured cluster using order set constraints.
>>>
>>> Here the example
>>>
>>> Ordering Constraints:
>>>   Resource Sets:
>>> set MYIP_1 MYIP_2 MYFTP MYIP_5 action=start sequential=false
>>> require-all=true set MYIP_3 MYIP_4 MYSMTP action=start sequential=true
>>> require-all=true setoptions symmetrical=false
>>> set MYSMTP MYIP_4 MYIP_3 action=stop sequential=true
>>> require-all=true set MYIP_5 MYFTP MYIP_2 MYIP_1 action=stop
>>> sequential=true require-all=true setoptions symmetrical=false kind=Mandatory
>>>
>>> The constrait work as expected on start but when stopping the resource
>>> don't respect the order.
>>> Any help is appreciated
>>>
>>> Thank and regards
>>> Ivan
>>
>> symmetrical=false means the order only applies for starting
> 
> From the name (symmetrical) alone it could also mean that it only applies for 
> stopping ;-)
> (Another example where better names would be nice)

Well, more specifically, it only applies to the action specified in the
constraint. I hadn't noticed before that the second constraint here has
action=stop, so yes, that one would only apply for stopping.

In the above example, the two constraints are identical to a single
constraint with symmetrical=true, since the second constraint is just
the reverse of the first.


___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Ordering Sets of Resources

[Ulrich Windl]

>>> Ken Gaillot  schrieb am 26.02.2017 um 20:04 in 
>>> Nachricht
:
> On 02/25/2017 03:35 PM, iva...@libero.it wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> i have configured a two node cluster on redhat 7.
>> 
>> Because I need to manage resources stopping and starting singularly when
>> they are running I have configured cluster using order set constraints.
>> 
>> Here the example
>> 
>> Ordering Constraints:
>>   Resource Sets:
>> set MYIP_1 MYIP_2 MYFTP MYIP_5 action=start sequential=false
>> require-all=true set MYIP_3 MYIP_4 MYSMTP action=start sequential=true
>> require-all=true setoptions symmetrical=false
>> set MYSMTP MYIP_4 MYIP_3 action=stop sequential=true
>> require-all=true set MYIP_5 MYFTP MYIP_2 MYIP_1 action=stop
>> sequential=true require-all=true setoptions symmetrical=false kind=Mandatory
>> 
>> The constrait work as expected on start but when stopping the resource
>> don't respect the order.
>> Any help is appreciated
>> 
>> Thank and regards
>> Ivan
> 
> symmetrical=false means the order only applies for starting

>From the name (symmetrical) alone it could also mean that it only applies for 
>stopping ;-)
(Another example where better names would be nice)

> 
> 
> ___
> Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org 
> http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org 
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf 
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org 





___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org