Re: [ClusterLabs] Resources still retains in Primary Node even though its interface went down

[pillai bs]

Thanks Ken Gaillot,
I will try configuring the resources to monitor and update. Thank you.

Regards,
Madhan.B


On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Ken Gaillot  wrote:

> On 05/18/2017 07:54 AM, pillai bs wrote:
> > Hi Ken Gaillot,
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply.
> > No i didnt configured any thing to monitor the resources.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Madhan.B
>
> Pacemaker has the built-in capability to monitor resources, but it
> doesn't do that unless you tell it to. Without a monitor, Pacemaker will
> never know when a resource has failed.
>
> How you configure a monitor depends on whether you use crm shell, pcs,
> or whatever, but basically you just specify that you want to create an
> operation for the resource of type "monitor" with some interval (such as
> 30 seconds).
>
>
> > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Ken Gaillot  > > wrote:
> >
> > On 05/12/2017 09:43 AM, pillai bs wrote:
> > > Thank you for the Prompt reply.
> > > I have one more question.sorry it might be silly. but am wondering
> after
> > > noticed this.
> > >  I made that interface down  but how the ip
> address(Public)
> > > & VIP (IP resource) are still in primary node.
> > > If i made interface down, public IP address also have to go down
> right?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > pillai.bs  
> >
> > Did you configure a monitor operation on the IP address resources?
> >
> > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Ken Gaillot  
> > > >> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 05/03/2017 02:43 AM, pillai bs wrote:
> > > > Hi Experts!!!
> > > >
> > > >   Am having two node setup for HA
> > (Primary/Secondary) with
> > > > separate resources for Home/data/logs/Virtual IP.. As known
> the
> > > Expected
> > > > behavior should be , if Primary node went down, secondary
> > has to take
> > > > in-charge (meaning initially the VIP will point the primary
> > node, so
> > > > user can access home/data/logs from primary node.Once
> > primary node
> > > went
> > > > down, the VIP/floatingIP will point the secondary node so
> > that the
> > > user
> > > > can experienced uninterrupted service).
> > > >  I'm using dual ring support to avoid split
> > brain. I have
> > > > two interfaces (Public & Private).Intention for having
> private
> > > interface
> > > > is for Data Sync alone.
> > > >
> > > > I have tested my setup in two different ways:
> > > > 1. Made primary Interface down (ifdown eth0), as expected
> > VIP and
> > > other
> > > > resources moved from primary to secondary node.(VIP will not
> be
> > > > reachable from primary node)
> > > > 2. Made Primary Interface down (Physically unplugged the
> > Ethernet
> > > > Cable). The primary node still retain the resources,
> > > VIP/FloatingIP was
> > > > reachable from primary node.
> > > >
> > > > Is my testing correct?? how come the VIP will be reachable
> > even though
> > > > eth0 was down. Please advice!!!
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Madhan.B
> > >
> > > Sorry, didn't see this message before replying to the other
> one :)
> > >
> > > The IP resource is successful if the IP is up *on that host*.
> > It doesn't
> > > check that the IP is reachable from any other site. Similarly,
> > > filesystem resources just make sure that the filesystem can be
> > mounted
> > > on the host. So, unplugging the Ethernet won't necessarily
> > make those
> > > resources fail.
> > >
> > > Take a look at the ocf:pacemaker:ping resource for a way to
> > ensure that
> > > the primary host has connectivity to the outside world. Also,
> > be sure
> > > you have fencing configured, so that the surviving node can
> > kill a node
> > > that is completely cut off or unresponsive.
>
>
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Re: [ClusterLabs] Resources still retains in Primary Node even though its interface went down

[pillai bs]

Thank you for the Prompt reply.
I have one more question.sorry it might be silly. but am wondering after
noticed this.
 I made that interface down  but how the ip address(Public) &
VIP (IP resource) are still in primary node.
If i made interface down, public IP address also have to go down right?

Regards,
pillai.bs

On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Ken Gaillot  wrote:

> On 05/03/2017 02:43 AM, pillai bs wrote:
> > Hi Experts!!!
> >
> >   Am having two node setup for HA (Primary/Secondary) with
> > separate resources for Home/data/logs/Virtual IP.. As known the Expected
> > behavior should be , if Primary node went down, secondary has to take
> > in-charge (meaning initially the VIP will point the primary node, so
> > user can access home/data/logs from primary node.Once primary node went
> > down, the VIP/floatingIP will point the secondary node so that the user
> > can experienced uninterrupted service).
> >  I'm using dual ring support to avoid split brain. I have
> > two interfaces (Public & Private).Intention for having private interface
> > is for Data Sync alone.
> >
> > I have tested my setup in two different ways:
> > 1. Made primary Interface down (ifdown eth0), as expected VIP and other
> > resources moved from primary to secondary node.(VIP will not be
> > reachable from primary node)
> > 2. Made Primary Interface down (Physically unplugged the Ethernet
> > Cable). The primary node still retain the resources, VIP/FloatingIP was
> > reachable from primary node.
> >
> > Is my testing correct?? how come the VIP will be reachable even though
> > eth0 was down. Please advice!!!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Madhan.B
>
> Sorry, didn't see this message before replying to the other one :)
>
> The IP resource is successful if the IP is up *on that host*. It doesn't
> check that the IP is reachable from any other site. Similarly,
> filesystem resources just make sure that the filesystem can be mounted
> on the host. So, unplugging the Ethernet won't necessarily make those
> resources fail.
>
> Take a look at the ocf:pacemaker:ping resource for a way to ensure that
> the primary host has connectivity to the outside world. Also, be sure
> you have fencing configured, so that the surviving node can kill a node
> that is completely cut off or unresponsive.
>
> ___
> Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
> http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Re: [ClusterLabs] Resources still retains in Primary Node even though its interface went down

[Ken Gaillot]

On 05/03/2017 02:43 AM, pillai bs wrote:
> Hi Experts!!!
> 
>   Am having two node setup for HA (Primary/Secondary) with
> separate resources for Home/data/logs/Virtual IP.. As known the Expected
> behavior should be , if Primary node went down, secondary has to take
> in-charge (meaning initially the VIP will point the primary node, so
> user can access home/data/logs from primary node.Once primary node went
> down, the VIP/floatingIP will point the secondary node so that the user
> can experienced uninterrupted service).
>  I'm using dual ring support to avoid split brain. I have
> two interfaces (Public & Private).Intention for having private interface
> is for Data Sync alone.
> 
> I have tested my setup in two different ways:
> 1. Made primary Interface down (ifdown eth0), as expected VIP and other
> resources moved from primary to secondary node.(VIP will not be
> reachable from primary node)
> 2. Made Primary Interface down (Physically unplugged the Ethernet
> Cable). The primary node still retain the resources, VIP/FloatingIP was
> reachable from primary node.
> 
> Is my testing correct?? how come the VIP will be reachable even though
> eth0 was down. Please advice!!!
> 
> Regards,
> Madhan.B

Sorry, didn't see this message before replying to the other one :)

The IP resource is successful if the IP is up *on that host*. It doesn't
check that the IP is reachable from any other site. Similarly,
filesystem resources just make sure that the filesystem can be mounted
on the host. So, unplugging the Ethernet won't necessarily make those
resources fail.

Take a look at the ocf:pacemaker:ping resource for a way to ensure that
the primary host has connectivity to the outside world. Also, be sure
you have fencing configured, so that the surviving node can kill a node
that is completely cut off or unresponsive.

___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

[ClusterLabs] Resources still retains in Primary Node even though its interface went down

[pillai bs]

Hi Experts!!!

  Am having two node setup for HA (Primary/Secondary) with
separate resources for Home/data/logs/Virtual IP.. As known the Expected
behavior should be , if Primary node went down, secondary has to take
in-charge (meaning initially the VIP will point the primary node, so user
can access home/data/logs from primary node.Once primary node went down,
the VIP/floatingIP will point the secondary node so that the user can
experienced uninterrupted service).
 I'm using dual ring support to avoid split brain. I have two
interfaces (Public & Private).Intention for having private interface is for
Data Sync alone.

I have tested my setup in two different ways:
1. Made primary Interface down (ifdown eth0), as expected VIP and other
resources moved from primary to secondary node.(VIP will not be reachable
from primary node)
2. Made Primary Interface down (Physically unplugged the Ethernet Cable).
The primary node still retain the resources, VIP/FloatingIP was reachable
from primary node.

Is my testing correct?? how come the VIP will be reachable even though eth0
was down. Please advice!!!

Regards,
Madhan.B
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org