Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster

[‪H Yavari‬ ‪]

Hi again,
I'm confused with attributes and rules. I was searching for dummies agents and 
I see the remote solution.You're are right. This is not advised for 
production.Now, I know that, physical servers should be map to services then I 
constraint services to other resource.
I couldn't find my way.
Regards,H.Yavari


  From: Klaus Wenninger 
 To: users@clusterlabs.org 
 Sent: Wednesday, 18 May 2016, 16:55:17
 Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster
   
On 05/18/2016 01:57 PM, ‪H Yavari‬ ‪ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for reply.
> I tested the first method "multi-site cluster". it was ok with ticket
> manually assignment. But I had issues with running Booth.
> I tested second method "constraints and attributes". I make a cluster
> with 4 nodes and define some constraints for nodes. But I have
> problems with node relations now.
> I was searching in the docs then I found
> "http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Remote/ch05.html";.
> I thinks this is very close to my answer. Do you offer this solution?

Going with pacemaker-remote would be a 3rd option.
Could imagine to have the 2 nodes with the master/slave-resource be the
full-fledged pacemaker-nodes
and the 2 other nodes would then be remote-nodes.
On the other hand this would end up in a 2-node-cluster which is bad for
quorum and thus should
be avoided whenever possible - especially if you have enough nodes anyway.

Thinking in the direction of making the remote-node-resources both tied
to one of the full nodes each
and collocated with the master role. And your service would then be tied
to the remote nodes.
Sounds like something funny to play with although I've never set up
anything like this ;-)
But as pacemaker-remote is not broadly used this way it is probably not
advisable to use that in a
production environment.

Or how did you have in mind to leverage pacemaker-remote for your scenario?

>
> Regards,
> H.Yavari
>
>
> 
> *From:* Kristoffer Grönlund 
> *To:* ‪H Yavari‬ ‪ ; Cluster Labs - All topics
> related to open-source clustering welcomed 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 18 May 2016, 10:36:39
> *Subject:* Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster
>
> ‪H Yavari‬ ‪ mailto:hyav...@rocketmail.com>>
> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > So you think for this solution Booth is better or attribute method?
> I'm not familiar with them so can you share your experiences with
> them?Many thanks.
> >
>
> I think a single cluster using node attributes should be a lot easier to
> understand and maintain, so I'd recommend that solution if it works out
> for you.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Kristoffer
>
> -- 
> // Kristoffer Grönlund
> // kgronl...@suse.com <mailto:kgronl...@suse.com>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org


___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org


  ___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster

[Klaus Wenninger]

On 05/18/2016 01:57 PM, ‪H Yavari‬ ‪ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for reply.
> I tested the first method "multi-site cluster". it was ok with ticket
> manually assignment. But I had issues with running Booth.
> I tested second method "constraints and attributes". I make a cluster
> with 4 nodes and define some constraints for nodes. But I have
> problems with node relations now.
> I was searching in the docs then I found
> "http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Remote/ch05.html";.
> I thinks this is very close to my answer. Do you offer this solution?

Going with pacemaker-remote would be a 3rd option.
Could imagine to have the 2 nodes with the master/slave-resource be the
full-fledged pacemaker-nodes
and the 2 other nodes would then be remote-nodes.
On the other hand this would end up in a 2-node-cluster which is bad for
quorum and thus should
be avoided whenever possible - especially if you have enough nodes anyway.

Thinking in the direction of making the remote-node-resources both tied
to one of the full nodes each
and collocated with the master role. And your service would then be tied
to the remote nodes.
Sounds like something funny to play with although I've never set up
anything like this ;-)
But as pacemaker-remote is not broadly used this way it is probably not
advisable to use that in a
production environment.

Or how did you have in mind to leverage pacemaker-remote for your scenario?

>
> Regards,
> H.Yavari
>
>
> 
> *From:* Kristoffer Grönlund 
> *To:* ‪H Yavari‬ ‪ ; Cluster Labs - All topics
> related to open-source clustering welcomed 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 18 May 2016, 10:36:39
> *Subject:* Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster
>
> ‪H Yavari‬ ‪ mailto:hyav...@rocketmail.com>>
> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > So you think for this solution Booth is better or attribute method?
> I'm not familiar with them so can you share your experiences with
> them?Many thanks.
> >
>
> I think a single cluster using node attributes should be a lot easier to
> understand and maintain, so I'd recommend that solution if it works out
> for you.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Kristoffer
>
> -- 
> // Kristoffer Grönlund
> // kgronl...@suse.com <mailto:kgronl...@suse.com>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org


___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster

[‪H Yavari‬ ‪]

Hi,
Thank you for reply. 
I tested the first method "multi-site cluster". it was ok with ticket manually 
assignment. But I had issues with running Booth.I tested second method 
"constraints and attributes". I make a cluster with 4 nodes and define some 
constraints for nodes. But I have problems with node relations now.
I was searching in the docs then I found 
"http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Remote/ch05.html".I
 thinks this is very close to my answer. Do you offer this solution?
Regards,H.Yavari


  From: Kristoffer Grönlund 
 To: ‪H Yavari‬ ‪ ; Cluster Labs - All topics related 
to open-source clustering welcomed  
 Sent: Wednesday, 18 May 2016, 10:36:39
 Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster
   
‪H Yavari‬ ‪  writes:

> Hi,
> So you think for this solution Booth is better or attribute method? I'm not 
> familiar with them so can you share your experiences with them?Many thanks.
>

I think a single cluster using node attributes should be a lot easier to
understand and maintain, so I'd recommend that solution if it works out
for you.

Cheers,
Kristoffer

-- 
// Kristoffer Grönlund
// kgronl...@suse.com

  ___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster

[Kristoffer Grönlund]

‪H Yavari‬ ‪  writes:

> Hi,
> So you think for this solution Booth is better or attribute method? I'm not 
> familiar with them so can you share your experiences with them?Many thanks.
>

I think a single cluster using node attributes should be a lot easier to
understand and maintain, so I'd recommend that solution if it works out
for you.

Cheers,
Kristoffer

-- 
// Kristoffer Grönlund
// kgronl...@suse.com

___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster

[‪H Yavari‬ ‪]

Hi,
I begin to test. So I defined 2 clusters that are include: Cluster 1: App1 and 
App3   Cluster 2: App2 and App4
Now If I want enable IPaddr as a resource on clusters, this resource will 
assign to both nodes. while ip float should run only on App3 and App4.Should I 
use constraints to limit ip float resource to only one node in each cluster? so 
I should do this for other resource too and then use Booth for CTR?Any hints or 
sample save my life :)

Regards,H.Yavari


  From: Klaus Wenninger 
 To: users@clusterlabs.org 
 Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2016, 11:08:51
 Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster
   
On 05/17/2016 08:20 AM, ‪H Yavari‬ ‪ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Emm I have a scenario and I'm confused. So I'm searching for the
> solutions. Can you please check this
> http://clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2016-April/002796.html
>
> I don't know how achieve to this? with Booth? with attribute? 2
> clusters or 1 cluster?

I would say you have 2 options:

- 1 cluster with node attributes and these dummy resources I had
described previously in the thread. (Unless
  anybody has a better idea how to tackle this).
- 2 small clusters and use booth

Which one is better depends e.g. on where your servers are located -
timing/reliability issues with certain network connections
between them?
Bringing up the booth infrastructure is of course an issue as well...

>
> Please show me a way.
>
> Many thanks.
>
> Regards,
> H.Yavari
>
>
> 
> *From:* Kristoffer Grönlund 
>
>
>
> ‪H Yavari‬ ‪ mailto:hyav...@rocketmail.com>>
> writes:
>
> > Thank you for reply.
> > I mean when in cluster X , node A is online and node B is offline,
> in cluster Y nodes will have same status.
>
> Why do you want to have two clusters with the same set of nodes? A
> single cluster can do everything that the two clusters could. If you
> want to run certain resources on only some of the nodes, you can achieve
> this with node attributes and location constraints.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Kristoffer
>
> -- 
> // Kristoffer Grönlund
> // kgronl...@suse.com <mailto:kgronl...@suse.com>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org


___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org


  ___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster

[‪H Yavari‬ ‪]

Hi,
So you think for this solution Booth is better or attribute method? I'm not 
familiar with them so can you share your experiences with them?Many thanks.


Regards,H.Yavari
 

  From: Kristoffer Grönlund 
 To: ‪H Yavari‬ ‪ ; Cluster Labs - All topics related 
to open-source clustering welcomed  
 Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2016, 11:33:37
 Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster
   
‪H Yavari‬ ‪  writes:

> Hi,
> Emm I have a scenario and I'm confused. So I'm searching for the solutions. 
> Can you please check this 
> http://clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2016-April/002796.html
> I don't know how achieve to this? with Booth? with attribute? 2 clusters or 1 
> cluster?
> Please show me a way.
> Many thanks.
> Regards,H.Yavari

Ah,

If I understand the suggestion there correctly, it is to have two
clusters, with a total of 4 nodes:

Cluster 1:

App 1 + App 3

Cluster 2:

App 2 + App 4


The cluster configuration on both clusters should be the same:

1. Your services
2. A ticket that allows your services to run when granted

Then use booth to connect the clusters and move the services from
cluster 1 (App 1 and App 3) to cluster 2 (App 2 and App 4).

Cheers,
Kristoffer

>
>
>      From: Kristoffer Grönlund 
>
>  
>    
> ‪H Yavari‬ ‪  writes:
>
>> Thank you for reply.
>> I mean when in cluster X , node A is online and node B is offline, in 
>> cluster Y nodes will have same status.
>
> Why do you want to have two clusters with the same set of nodes? A
> single cluster can do everything that the two clusters could. If you
> want to run certain resources on only some of the nodes, you can achieve
> this with node attributes and location constraints.
>
> Cheers,
> Kristoffer
>
> -- 
> // Kristoffer Grönlund
> // kgronl...@suse.com
>
>  

-- 
// Kristoffer Grönlund
// kgronl...@suse.com

  ___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster

[‪H Yavari‬ ‪]

Hi,
Thank you again. 
Servers are in one location. I read a few about Booth. But I'm afraid of 
ticketing. This servers are very sensitive. 
So with this situation you offer Booth or using attribute method??
Best Regards,H.Yavari
 

  From: Klaus Wenninger 
 To: users@clusterlabs.org 
 Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2016, 11:08:51
 Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster
   
On 05/17/2016 08:20 AM, ‪H Yavari‬ ‪ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Emm I have a scenario and I'm confused. So I'm searching for the
> solutions. Can you please check this
> http://clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2016-April/002796.html
>
> I don't know how achieve to this? with Booth? with attribute? 2
> clusters or 1 cluster?

I would say you have 2 options:

- 1 cluster with node attributes and these dummy resources I had
described previously in the thread. (Unless
  anybody has a better idea how to tackle this).
- 2 small clusters and use booth

Which one is better depends e.g. on where your servers are located -
timing/reliability issues with certain network connections
between them?
Bringing up the booth infrastructure is of course an issue as well...

>
> Please show me a way.
>
> Many thanks.
>
> Regards,
> H.Yavari
>
>
> 
> *From:* Kristoffer Grönlund 
>
>
>
> ‪H Yavari‬ ‪ mailto:hyav...@rocketmail.com>>
> writes:
>
> > Thank you for reply.
> > I mean when in cluster X , node A is online and node B is offline,
> in cluster Y nodes will have same status.
>
> Why do you want to have two clusters with the same set of nodes? A
> single cluster can do everything that the two clusters could. If you
> want to run certain resources on only some of the nodes, you can achieve
> this with node attributes and location constraints.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Kristoffer
>
> -- 
> // Kristoffer Grönlund
> // kgronl...@suse.com <mailto:kgronl...@suse.com>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org


___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org


  ___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster

[Kristoffer Grönlund]

‪H Yavari‬ ‪  writes:

> Hi,
> Emm I have a scenario and I'm confused. So I'm searching for the solutions. 
> Can you please check this 
> http://clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2016-April/002796.html
> I don't know how achieve to this? with Booth? with attribute? 2 clusters or 1 
> cluster?
> Please show me a way.
> Many thanks.
> Regards,H.Yavari

Ah,

If I understand the suggestion there correctly, it is to have two
clusters, with a total of 4 nodes:

Cluster 1:

App 1 + App 3

Cluster 2:

App 2 + App 4


The cluster configuration on both clusters should be the same:

1. Your services
2. A ticket that allows your services to run when granted

Then use booth to connect the clusters and move the services from
cluster 1 (App 1 and App 3) to cluster 2 (App 2 and App 4).

Cheers,
Kristoffer

>
>
>   From: Kristoffer Grönlund 
>
>  
>
> ‪H Yavari‬ ‪  writes:
>
>> Thank you for reply.
>> I mean when in cluster X , node A is online and node B is offline, in 
>> cluster Y nodes will have same status.
>
> Why do you want to have two clusters with the same set of nodes? A
> single cluster can do everything that the two clusters could. If you
> want to run certain resources on only some of the nodes, you can achieve
> this with node attributes and location constraints.
>
> Cheers,
> Kristoffer
>
> -- 
> // Kristoffer Grönlund
> // kgronl...@suse.com
>
>   

-- 
// Kristoffer Grönlund
// kgronl...@suse.com

___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster

[Klaus Wenninger]

On 05/17/2016 08:20 AM, ‪H Yavari‬ ‪ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Emm I have a scenario and I'm confused. So I'm searching for the
> solutions. Can you please check this
> http://clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2016-April/002796.html
>
> I don't know how achieve to this? with Booth? with attribute? 2
> clusters or 1 cluster?

I would say you have 2 options:

- 1 cluster with node attributes and these dummy resources I had
described previously in the thread. (Unless
  anybody has a better idea how to tackle this).
- 2 small clusters and use booth

Which one is better depends e.g. on where your servers are located -
timing/reliability issues with certain network connections
between them?
Bringing up the booth infrastructure is of course an issue as well...

>
> Please show me a way.
>
> Many thanks.
>
> Regards,
> H.Yavari
>
>
> 
> *From:* Kristoffer Grönlund 
>
>
>
> ‪H Yavari‬ ‪ mailto:hyav...@rocketmail.com>>
> writes:
>
> > Thank you for reply.
> > I mean when in cluster X , node A is online and node B is offline,
> in cluster Y nodes will have same status.
>
> Why do you want to have two clusters with the same set of nodes? A
> single cluster can do everything that the two clusters could. If you
> want to run certain resources on only some of the nodes, you can achieve
> this with node attributes and location constraints.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Kristoffer
>
> -- 
> // Kristoffer Grönlund
> // kgronl...@suse.com 
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org


___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster

[‪H Yavari‬ ‪]

Hi,
Emm I have a scenario and I'm confused. So I'm searching for the solutions. Can 
you please check this 
http://clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2016-April/002796.html
I don't know how achieve to this? with Booth? with attribute? 2 clusters or 1 
cluster?
Please show me a way.
Many thanks.
Regards,H.Yavari


  From: Kristoffer Grönlund 

 
   
‪H Yavari‬ ‪  writes:

> Thank you for reply.
> I mean when in cluster X , node A is online and node B is offline, in cluster 
> Y nodes will have same status.

Why do you want to have two clusters with the same set of nodes? A
single cluster can do everything that the two clusters could. If you
want to run certain resources on only some of the nodes, you can achieve
this with node attributes and location constraints.

Cheers,
Kristoffer

-- 
// Kristoffer Grönlund
// kgronl...@suse.com

  ___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster

[Kristoffer Grönlund]

‪H Yavari‬ ‪  writes:

> Thank you for reply.
> I mean when in cluster X , node A is online and node B is offline, in cluster 
> Y nodes will have same status.

Why do you want to have two clusters with the same set of nodes? A
single cluster can do everything that the two clusters could. If you
want to run certain resources on only some of the nodes, you can achieve
this with node attributes and location constraints.

Cheers,
Kristoffer

-- 
// Kristoffer Grönlund
// kgronl...@suse.com

___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster

[‪H Yavari‬ ‪]

Thank you for reply.
I mean when in cluster X , node A is online and node B is offline, in cluster Y 
nodes will have same status.

Regards,

  From: Kristoffer Grönlund 
 
   
‪H Yavari‬ ‪  writes:

> Hi,
> I have a question, it is possible to make a relation between 2 Clusters?I 
> mean when a node changing occurs in one cluster, it happens on other cluster 
> too.
>

I'm not sure what you mean by a node changing, but there is booth [1]
which enables the transfer of resource ownership between multiple
clusters.

[1]: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/booth

Cheers,
Kristoffer

> It is accessible?
> Thanks for helps.
>
> Regards,H.Yavari
>
> ___
> Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

-- 
// Kristoffer Grönlund
// kgronl...@suse.com

  ___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster

[Kristoffer Grönlund]

‪H Yavari‬ ‪  writes:

> Hi,
> I have a question, it is possible to make a relation between 2 Clusters?I 
> mean when a node changing occurs in one cluster, it happens on other cluster 
> too.
>

I'm not sure what you mean by a node changing, but there is booth [1]
which enables the transfer of resource ownership between multiple
clusters.

[1]: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/booth

Cheers,
Kristoffer

> It is accessible?
> Thanks for helps.
>
> Regards,H.Yavari
>
> ___
> Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

-- 
// Kristoffer Grönlund
// kgronl...@suse.com

___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

[ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster

[‪H Yavari‬ ‪]

Hi,
I have a question, it is possible to make a relation between 2 Clusters?I mean 
when a node changing occurs in one cluster, it happens on other cluster too.

It is accessible?
Thanks for helps.

Regards,H.Yavari

___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org