Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Sub‑clusters / super‑clusters - working :)

2021-08-06 Thread kgaillot
On Fri, 2021-08-06 at 15:48 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > > > Andrei Borzenkov  schrieb am 06.08.2021 um
> > > > 15:14 in
> Nachricht
> :
> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 3:47 PM Ulrich Windl
> >  wrote:
> > > > > > Antony Stone  schrieb am
> > > > > > 06.08.2021 um
> > > 14:41 in
> > > Nachricht <202108061441.59936.antony.st...@ha.open.source.it>:
> > > ...
> > > >   location pref_A GroupA rule ‑inf: site ne cityA
> > > >   location pref_B GroupB rule ‑inf: site ne cityB
> > > 
> > > I'm wondering whether the first is equivalentto
> > > location pref_A GroupA rule inf: site eq cityA
> > > 
> > 
> > No, it is not. The original constraint prohibits running resources
> > anywhere except cityA even if cityA is not available; your version
> > allows it if cityA is not available.
> 
> ?? If a resource must run on "cityA" and cityA is unavailable, then
> will it
> run elsewhere?

-inf = must not
+inf != must

-- 
Ken Gaillot 

___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/


Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Sub‑clusters / super‑clusters?

2021-08-05 Thread Antony Stone
On Thursday 05 August 2021 at 07:48:37, Ulrich Windl wrote:

> Antony Stone schrieb am 04.08.2021 um 21:27:
> > 
> > As soon as I connect the clusters at city A and city B, and apply the
> > location contraints and weighting rules you have suggested:
> > 
> > 1. everything works, including the single resource at either city A or
> > city B, so long as both clusters are operational.
> > 
> > 2. as soon as one cluster fails (all three of its nodes nodes become
> > unavailable), then the other cluster stops running all its resources as
> > well. This is even with quorum=2.
> 
> Have you ever tried to find out why this happens? (Talking about logs)

Not in detail, no, but just in case there's a chance of getting this working 
as suggested simply using location constraints, I shall look further.

Thanks,


Antony.

-- 
This sentence contains exacly three erors.

   Please reply to the list;
 please *don't* CC me.
___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/