Re: GSoC: LiveCD

2008-05-20 Thread Louisa Luciani
Jost Tobias Springenberg wrote:
 Another feature that might be worth thinking of is the possibility to easily 
 re-spin the dvd.
 Such that you can download it use it, if you like you can install it and
 after you have used it for some time you might think of applications that you 
 need which are not there
 or things that you do not need/want. 
 In such a case an easy mechanism to add/remove pieces of software to the dvd 
 would definitely be worth-while!
 Another opportunity (which may be easier to implement) is to have the ability 
 to store configuration files
 somewhere in a way that you can at least customize certain parts of the 
 environment.
 
 Maybe those suggestions also take it too far, but that is what came to my 
 mind.
 
 Greetings,
 Tobias
 

That would definitely be nice. Ubuntu's LiveCD allows you to boot in
persistent mode by using a USB-drive (or alternatively a loopback file).
Perhaps something similar can be implemented.

-- 
Louisa Luciani
www.lolaluci.se/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: GSoC: LiveCD

2008-05-20 Thread Ben Cadieux
What's the purpose of this LiveCD?  Who's it targeting?

Seems like a bit of a shotgun approach for everyone to submit what
they want on it.  It's much easier to determine what should be on it
when it's got some very clear goals.

I tend to use LiveCDs for:
 - fixing problems (though I use bootable USB for the most part nowadays)
 - using systems that are otherwise 'locked down' such as university
pcs/etc to browser / listen to music / whatever may otherwise not work
 - test out a new OS, or show the OS off to others

Those 3 uses alone would totally change either what's provided, or
require a boot menu at least.  For fixing a PC, you'd want the most
stable kernel and minimal drivers (no audio, for example) and some
decent recovery and diagnostic tools (archivers, file system drivers,
etc).  For an os replacement you'd want all drivers and very few beta
features unless they really enhance the experience.  For testing the
OS or showing it off, you might want all the neat new features
(hammer, vkernels, etc).  There would be other uses, like instant
clusters, etc, that would have yet more/other requirements.

Anyway, I'll still send in what I want on it, but thought I'd add my
two cents :)

Best Regards,
Ben Cadieux