lagg/trunk or ng_one2many ?
Hi guys ! I try use one trunk interface on DragonFly... but, only option ng_one2many is support on the moment for me or no ? exist one port of lagg (freebsd) or trunk (openbsd) .. or again agr (from Netbsd) for DragonFly ? what alternative for this ? -- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre http://www.mundounix.com.br ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: cont...@mundounix.com.br
Re: 2.0 packages being removed from avalon
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:05:40 -0400 (EDT), Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > Since 2.4 is out, and we'll have binary pkgsrc packages for it soon, the > 2.0 packages are due to be removed. If this will cause you trouble, > please speak up. > > The plan is to keep packages for the current release (2.4) and the > previous release (2.2), which gives us a binary package retention > schedule of about a year. If possible, I would recommend (and request) keeping packages available for at least two previous releases rather than just one. I just finally upgraded my work station to 2.2.1 finally from 1.10.1 only about a week ago and we still have other work stations around here that are running 1.10.x. In fact, our firewall/misc server is still running 1.8.0-RELEASE. A lot of our machines get pretty old because lack of time and necessity to upgrading them. You know the adage: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". By the way, I cannot get to the package directories to any previous release on any of the mirrors today. I just get error 550 "Permission denied". I was trying to access the 2.2.1 packages. I tried ftp://ftp.twaren.net/BSD/DragonFlyBSD/packages/ ftp://www.theshell.com/pub/DragonFly/packages/ ftp://chlamydia.fs.ei.tum.de/pub/DragonFly/packages/ On chlamydia I can get to the DragonFly-2.3.1 directory but nothing older. On theshell, the only directory I seem to be able to access is DragonFly-2.4.0-upload - Vince
Re: altq over vlan
\o/ \o/ \o/
YEP !!! is working !!!
morcego# uname -a
DragonFly morcego.mundounix.com.br 2.4.0-RELEASE DragonFly
v2.4.0.11.g958a8-RELEASE #1: Wed Sep 23 02:35:26 BRT 2009
r...@morcego.mundounix.com.br:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MUNDOUNIX i386
morcego# pfctl -sq
queue root_vlan10 bandwidth 2Mb priority 0 {teste_up, def_up}
queue teste_up bandwidth 1Mb hfsc( realtime 512Kb upperlimit 1Mb )
queue def_up bandwidth 1Mb hfsc( default realtime 1Mb upperlimit 2Mb )
queue root_vlan20 bandwidth 2Mb priority 0 {teste_down, def_down}
queue teste_down bandwidth 1Mb hfsc( realtime 512Kb upperlimit 1Mb )
queue def_down bandwidth 1Mb hfsc( default realtime 1Mb upperlimit 2Mb )
morcego#
thanks !! DflyBSD team !!!
2009/9/22 Sepherosa Ziehau :
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Luiz Gustavo S. Costa
> wrote:
>> Hi !
>>
>> It's possible i use altq configuration over vlan ?
>
> It is possible and probably works, though I never tried.
>
> Best Regards,
> sephe
>
> --
> Live Free or Die
>
--
Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD)
*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+
mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre
http://www.mundounix.com.br
ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: cont...@mundounix.com.br
Re: Which graphics card for dual display?
elekktrett...@exemail.com.au wrote: Is the nvidia wrapper up to date with the devfs work? It is not a wrapper, it is a port. Works on my office PC (some Nvidia quadro in there). cheers simon -- <3 the future +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\ rock the past +++ space for low CHF NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ / Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \ Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
Re: altq over vlan
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Luiz Gustavo S. Costa wrote: > Hi ! > > It's possible i use altq configuration over vlan ? It is possible and probably works, though I never tried. Best Regards, sephe -- Live Free or Die
Re: Which graphics card for dual display?
Thanks, Is the nvidia wrapper up to date with the devfs work? Petr
2.4.0 DVD kernels
What kernels are included on the DVD iso? I have a couple of DELL 1650 servers that are not able to get thru the bootup without panic and was trying the various listed boot options but they returned errors b/c the various options weren't on the disk, i.e., smp w/o acpi -- John Mire: jm...@lsuhsc.edunetwork Administration LSU Health Sciences Center - Shreveport
altq over vlan
Hi ! It's possible i use altq configuration over vlan ? On freebsd it's dont possible, only Openbsd... and dragonfly ? is possible ? thanks -- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre http://www.mundounix.com.br ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: cont...@mundounix.com.br
Re: 2.0 packages being removed from avalon
On Tue, September 22, 2009 10:00 am, Jordan Gordeev wrote: >> > Who is gonna be hurt if 2.0 packages remain available? > "Current + previous release" is the plan for keeping the packages around; at some point they are not useful any more, and this plan gives them a year of life. We can extend this if it turns out there's people that are both staying at old versions and needing binary packages to be available, but I don't think that's the case (yet). Pkgsrc quarterly releases are only updated for the quarter they are current, so this seems to cover enough time to cover most usage.
Re: Which graphics card for dual display?
elekktrett...@exemail.com.au wrote: > Im going to be setting up a new workstation with 2x 19inch LCD displays > using DVI. Which graphics card should I get that would work well in DF, > any ideas? In general any Intel (using ADD2 card) or dual DVI ATI card will do. From my personal experience (using various Intel, ATI and Nvidia cards) I'd recommend ATI up to R500 though. -- Hasso Tepper
Re: Which graphics card for dual display?
elekktrett...@exemail.com.au wrote: Im going to be setting up a new workstation with 2x 19inch LCD displays using DVI. Which graphics card should I get that would work well in DF, any ideas? nvidia, the binary driver works quite well. I do have problems when using more than 2GB of RAM though, but it seems that this also happens on FreeBSD. cheers simon
Which graphics card for dual display?
Im going to be setting up a new workstation with 2x 19inch LCD displays using DVI. Which graphics card should I get that would work well in DF, any ideas? Petr
Re: 2.0 packages being removed from avalon
Jordan Gordeev wrote: Justin C. Sherrill wrote: Since 2.4 is out, and we'll have binary pkgsrc packages for it soon, the 2.0 packages are due to be removed. If this will cause you trouble, please speak up. The plan is to keep packages for the current release (2.4) and the previous release (2.2), which gives us a binary package retention schedule of about a year. (The 2.3.1 packages on avalon.dragonflybsd.org currently work for 2.4, and the directories are symlinked in until a 2.4 build is finished.) Who is gonna be hurt if 2.0 packages remain available? Disk space, confused people, unfixed security issues...
Updated patch-bktr to make ffmpeg compile on DragonFly
Hi, The attached file is a replacement for multimedia/ffmpeg/patches/patch-bktr that fixes a typo in the condition for building on DragonFly in libavdevice/bktr.c. I have raised the issue upstream as well so hopefully it will get fixed upstream soon, in the meantime this gets ffmpeg building. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays C:>WIN | A better way to focus the sun The computer obeys and wins.|licences available see You lose and Bill collects. |http://www.sohara.org/ patch-bktr Description: Binary data
Re: 2.0 packages being removed from avalon
Justin C. Sherrill wrote: Since 2.4 is out, and we'll have binary pkgsrc packages for it soon, the 2.0 packages are due to be removed. If this will cause you trouble, please speak up. The plan is to keep packages for the current release (2.4) and the previous release (2.2), which gives us a binary package retention schedule of about a year. (The 2.3.1 packages on avalon.dragonflybsd.org currently work for 2.4, and the directories are symlinked in until a 2.4 build is finished.) Who is gonna be hurt if 2.0 packages remain available?
2.0 packages being removed from avalon
Since 2.4 is out, and we'll have binary pkgsrc packages for it soon, the 2.0 packages are due to be removed. If this will cause you trouble, please speak up. The plan is to keep packages for the current release (2.4) and the previous release (2.2), which gives us a binary package retention schedule of about a year. (The 2.3.1 packages on avalon.dragonflybsd.org currently work for 2.4, and the directories are symlinked in until a 2.4 build is finished.)
