Re: Linuxulator question, boot loader oddity
I'm willing to go with that explanation, lacking a better one. ;-) However, in vi I would have had to accidentally type the sequence g~~, which doesn't seem likely. Tim On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > On Sun, November 7, 2010 8:45 am, Tim Darby wrote: >> That's when I noticed that loader.conf looked like >> this: >> >> VFS.ROOT.MOUNTFROM="HAMMER:SERNO/s0a4j1ta141435.S1D" >> linux_load=yes >> >> I tried changing the mountfrom line to: >> vfs.root.mountfrom="hammer:serno/S0A4J1TA141435.s1d" > > I don't know what editor you use, but is it possible you somehow hit the > right key sequence to invert case on that line while entering the > linuxulator stuff? It's a guess, but it fits the symptoms. > >
Re: Linuxulator question, boot loader oddity
On Sun, November 7, 2010 8:45 am, Tim Darby wrote: > That's when I noticed that loader.conf looked like > this: > > VFS.ROOT.MOUNTFROM="HAMMER:SERNO/s0a4j1ta141435.S1D" > linux_load=yes > > I tried changing the mountfrom line to: > vfs.root.mountfrom="hammer:serno/S0A4J1TA141435.s1d" I don't know what editor you use, but is it possible you somehow hit the right key sequence to invert case on that line while entering the linuxulator stuff? It's a guess, but it fits the symptoms.
Linuxulator question, boot loader oddity
I'm running 2.8 now and it looks great so far. I setup linuxulator for the first time yesterday as follows: - added linux_load=yes to /boot/loader.conf - added linux_enable=yes to /etc/rc.conf - pkg_radd suse_base - mount -t linprocfs none /usr/pkg/emul/linux/proc Did I miss anything? I've only tested it with java and that works fine. Here's the weird part. After I added the line linux_load=yes to /boot/loader.conf, the machine failed to come up and landed me at the mountroot prompt. That's when I noticed that loader.conf looked like this: VFS.ROOT.MOUNTFROM="HAMMER:SERNO/s0a4j1ta141435.S1D" linux_load=yes I tried changing the mountfrom line to: vfs.root.mountfrom="hammer:serno/S0A4J1TA141435.s1d" This fixed the root mount. So, I'm wondering how my system was able to boot before I made this change and why did simply adding a line to loader.conf cause it to break? Tim
Re: Linuxulator question
On 25/09/10 15:52, Tim Darby wrote: > What's the status of the Linuxulator? I saw that Alex put a lot of > work into it, so is it basically done and just needs testers? Linuxulator works quite nicely on x86; at least Java works and as far as I know Flash, too. On x86_64 there is no linuxulator at all. There was someone who started porting it to that platform, but as far as I know there's nothing to show for it. Personally I'd like to see it ported to x86_64 but I don't have the time. If anyone wants to volunteer, he can count on my support. Cheers, Alex Hornung
Linuxulator question
What's the status of the Linuxulator? I saw that Alex put a lot of work into it, so is it basically done and just needs testers? Thanks, Tim