Re: Building modular xorg
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 01:12:35PM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote: > The package x11/Xrender is in meta-pkgs/modular-xorg-libs. I'll > poke this information over on pkgsrc-users. Thanks for the response. No, it isn't. It never was. Joerg
Re: Building modular xorg
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 01:16:36AM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote: > This actually worked. However building what I'm trying to build seems to > require all of X, since the build stopped at: > > configure: error: X is required, but it was either disabled or not found. This is generally a sign that it tries to link with libXt for testing. Whether or not it actually *needs* libXt is a separate issue. Joerg
Re: Building modular xorg
Jeremy C Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Where did you make the above changes? > And what were you building that failed? And what packages failed? Well I was trying to build x11/Xrender. I was told on the pkgsrc-users list that I should use x11/libXrender instead. The package x11/Xrender is in meta-pkgs/modular-xorg-libs. I'll poke this information over on pkgsrc-users. Thanks for the response. -- Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> The opinions expressed above are entirely my own <<< What we see depends on mainly what we look for.
Re: Building modular xorg
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, Dave Hayes wrote: > Chris Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I ran into similar problems building some packages here and there - > > basically they need to be converted to use modular xorg - > > e.g. based on LIBS in the Makefile, they should > > > > .include "../../x11/x11libname/buildlink3.mk" > > > > instead of the previous: > > > > .include "../../mk/x11.buildlink3.mk" > > This actually worked. However building what I'm trying to build seems to > require all of X, since the build stopped at: > > configure: error: X is required, but it was either disabled or not found. Where did you make the above changes? And what were you building that failed? And what packages failed? > > tracing through the various includes might yield something fixable, > > thought I'm surprised if noone else has run into this ... > > I'm surprised too. I have no idea how the pbulk build Justin is doing > works at all. ;) Jeremy C. Reed
Re: Building modular xorg
Dave Hayes wrote: I'm surprised too. I have no idea how the pbulk build Justin is doing works at all. ;) actually - glad you reminded me - seems to be working for me here (using 'legacy' bulk) will send mk.conf in a separate email for your perusal
Re: Building modular xorg
Chris Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I ran into similar problems building some packages here and there - > basically they need to be converted to use modular xorg - > e.g. based on LIBS in the Makefile, they should > > .include "../../x11/x11libname/buildlink3.mk" > > instead of the previous: > > .include "../../mk/x11.buildlink3.mk" This actually worked. However building what I'm trying to build seems to require all of X, since the build stopped at: configure: error: X is required, but it was either disabled or not found. > tracing through the various includes might yield something fixable, > thought I'm surprised if noone else has run into this ... I'm surprised too. I have no idea how the pbulk build Justin is doing works at all. ;) -- Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> The opinions expressed above are entirely my own <<< God, to the Bee, is something which has two stings...
Re: Building modular xorg
Chris Turner wrote: Disclaimer: I haven't done my 1.12 builds yet, but.. on 1.10 / 2007Q3, my bulk build had the following: meta-pkgs/modular-xorg-apps \ meta-pkgs/modular-xorg-fonts \ meta-pkgs/modular-xorg-drivers \ x11/modular-xorg-server \ Although I suspect one of these will pull in modular-xorg-libs.. Going through various mk.conf's lying around - a pkgsrc-on-linux build might-have worked by just using 'meta-pkgs/xorg' .. or it could have failed & reverted to the method above.. yeah. anyway - probably best for someone else to answer this :) - Chris
Re: Building modular xorg
Chris Turner wrote: might-have worked by just using 'meta-pkgs/xorg' .. okay.. this doesn't even exist anymore.. staying quiet until I know for sure :) cheers - Chris
Re: Building modular xorg
Dave Hayes wrote: This actually failed differently (I download the vulns file nightly) than before, before I got this: ===> Building binary package for libXrender ... ERROR: This package has set PKG_FAIL_REASON: ERROR: Do not include x11.buildlink3.mk for X11_TYPE != "native". *** Error code 1 Disclaimer: I haven't done my 1.12 builds yet, but.. on 1.10 / 2007Q3, my bulk build had the following: meta-pkgs/modular-xorg-apps \ meta-pkgs/modular-xorg-fonts \ meta-pkgs/modular-xorg-drivers \ x11/modular-xorg-server \ Although I suspect one of these will pull in modular-xorg-libs.. I ran into similar problems building some packages here and there - basically they need to be converted to use modular xorg - e.g. based on LIBS in the Makefile, they should .include "../../x11/x11libname/buildlink3.mk" instead of the previous: .include "../../mk/x11.buildlink3.mk" tracing through the various includes might yield something fixable, thought I'm surprised if noone else has run into this ... Thanks, - Chris
