AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes)
Hi all, News in town for .NET + Flex developers! New AMF library for .NET developers using the .NET Standard 2.0, ie. 100% compatible with .NET Framework, Mono and for the first time .NET Core! The library is here: https://github.com/SolidSoft-Lda/AMFCore -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/
Re: AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes)
Many thanks Hugo! I'll tweet about it! :) https://twitter.com/ApacheFlex/status/1039064979956281345 best Carlos El dom., 9 sept. 2018 a las 15:24, hferreira () escribió: > Hi all, > > News in town for .NET + Flex developers! > > New AMF library for .NET developers using the .NET Standard 2.0, ie. 100% > compatible with .NET Framework, Mono and for the first time .NET Core! > > The library is here: https://github.com/SolidSoft-Lda/AMFCore > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes)
You welcome. -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/
Re: AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes)
Hugo, I don't know if you wrote this library or are just reporting it, but this is awesome news! I personally don't use .NET for AMF, I use PHP, but I can tell you that AMF is by far the fastest way to communicate with FLEX/AIR. Any libraries that keep this technology alive is a plus in my book!! Thanks for reporting. -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/
Re: AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes)
Hi bilbosax, Yes, I wrote this library myself after study how Fluorine works. AMF is fast and Fluorine was already super fast (I tested against other approachs). This library is even faster, with 0 Windows calls and works on every .NET runtimes based on .NET Standard 2.0 or higher. If you need AMF + .NET Core than this library is a most to have. If you need AMF + .NET Framework or Mono than this library is an option for a better performance. If you need AMF + port from .NET Framework or Mono to .NET Core than this library is the option. -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/
RE: AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes)
Thanks so much huge, meant to get around to this awhile ago but never did. Will definitely be checking it out. -Original Message- From: hugo Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2018 6:23 AM To: users@flex.apache.org Subject: AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes) Hi all, News in town for .NET + Flex developers! New AMF library for .NET developers using the .NET Standard 2.0, ie. 100% compatible with .NET Framework, Mono and for the first time .NET Core! The library is here: https://github.com/SolidSoft-Lda/AMFCore -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/
RE: AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes)
Not to sound too ignorant, but would this be a replacement for FluorineFx? From: Jason Taylor Sent: 9/27/18 6:28 PM To: users@flex.apache.org Subject: RE: AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes) Thanks so much huge, meant to get around to this awhile ago but never did. Will definitely be checking it out. -Original Message- From: hugo Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2018 6:23 AM To: users@flex.apache.org Subject: AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes) Hi all, News in town for .NET + Flex developers! New AMF library for .NET developers using the .NET Standard 2.0, ie. 100% compatible with .NET Framework, Mono and for the first time .NET Core! The library is here: https://github.com/SolidSoft-Lda/AMFCore -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/
RE: AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes)
Me too. I came to the point that I will refactor all my application to use json, lose every positive aspect of AMF and will slow down my app and that not acceptable or create this lib my self. It took a while but it's done and running without issues. -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/
RE: AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes)
FluorineFx supports .NET since version 1.1 + RTMP + DataSets + other features and have a deep dependency on Windows Api calls and IIS. AMFCore don't support all this features and will never be, and runs independent on the OS and web server thru .NET Standard. For AMF3 and DTO/VO objects and runtimes that implements .NET Standard 2.0+, yes, it's a new alternative option. If you need features that AMFCore don't support or you can't care about .NET Core/OS portability than perhaps FluorineFx can be a better option (specially if you need that specific features). The goal of this library is to migrate a project to .NET Core with the mininum effort, so this library supports both .NET Framework and .NET Core thru .NET Standard during the process. If you need aditional features, can you can implement for you self. You can contribute that new features if the performance is not affected because I don't care about a library that does everything, I will need only 10% and have to pay a price (performance). -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/
Re: AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes)
Will this library support https? I can recall that flourineFX was not supporting https calls. It used to work only over http. On Sun 30 Sep, 2018 5:41 pm hugo, wrote: > FluorineFx supports .NET since version 1.1 + RTMP + DataSets + other > features > and have a deep dependency on Windows Api calls and IIS. > AMFCore don't support all this features and will never be, and runs > independent on the OS and web server thru .NET Standard. > > For AMF3 and DTO/VO objects and runtimes that implements .NET Standard > 2.0+, > yes, it's a new alternative option. > > If you need features that AMFCore don't support or you can't care about > .NET > Core/OS portability than perhaps FluorineFx can be a better option > (specially if you need that specific features). > > The goal of this library is to migrate a project to .NET Core with the > mininum effort, so this library supports both .NET Framework and .NET Core > thru .NET Standard during the process. > > If you need aditional features, can you can implement for you self. > You can contribute that new features if the performance is not affected > because I don't care about a library that does everything, I will need only > 10% and have to pay a price (performance). > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/ >
Re: AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes)
Yes, it supports. Also FluorineFx supports. -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/
RE: AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes)
Hi Hugo, Thank you for your work. Does your library work in a WebAPI .NET project ? Could you provide an example ? Thanks a lot ! -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/
RE: AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes)
Hi Nisaba, Yes, it does. Actually it's what I use, while I'm waiting for .NET Core 2.2 to be released. You have a full documentation/example with .NET Framework (ASP.NET and ASP.NET Core) and .NET Core on the github project. You just need a Gateway controller. -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/
