[libreoffice-users] resizing superscript/subscript
Hi, I would like to change the default relative size of superscript font. The default value of 58% is too small, a value around 70% or 80% would be better for my use. I know how to change that for one occurrence, but I need to change the default value, modifiing all the text already there. I expected I would be able to edit the corresponding style but I don't find the relevant one. Thanks a lot in advance, Jean-Louis Onetoemail : jl.on...@free.fr -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Re: [libreoffice-users] about unicode characters:
I use several of the fonts listed on this page: http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/fonts.html I only used the Windows fonts, but they have also fonts for Linux/Unix/MacOSX. HTH, Jean-Louis On 15/03/2016 17:52, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote: On 03/15/2016 11:23 AM, toki wrote: On 15/03/2016 13:16, Tim wrote: do not want to include the "full set" of the available characters. A font with all Unicode glyphs in it, would contain 2^17 different glyphs, but current font format definitions restrict the size of a font to 2^16 different glyphs. Arial Unicode MS seems to me to have the most Unicode characters There are just over 50,000 glyphs in Arial, whilst Unifont has just under 60,000 glyphs. IOW, if you absolutely positively have to have a pan-unicode font, then Unifont is the way to go. jonathon In the Synaptic Package Manager, it shows that I have the Unifont installed, but I do not see a font named as that in my .font folder. I wonder where the font was re-installed to, since I had it installed via the package manager already, but could not find the name "Unifont" listed. When I went online to the Unifont "project", I downloaded the full 12 MB version TTF file. When I looked at it in the font viewer, it was very "boxy" - actually each character is made up with boxes. Both the Web site and the info in the package manager stated the boxiness of the font. I still wonder what is the best looking unicode font with somewhere near the number of characters/glyphs that Arial Unicode has. -- Jean-Louis Oneto email: jl.on...@free.fr -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Dear Libre Office team
Hi, If you are really worry about security, you should apply the rule in practice in high security agency (military...): only use software that you compîled yourself, from official source files, and after checking the sources for any backdoor or security issues. While usually you can get the source of proprietary sofware (with a non-disclosure agreement and often a lots of money), Open-source software let you do that for free. That's one major reason that those agencies favor more and more open source. Best regards, Jean-Louis On 13/10/2015 12:47, Alexander Y Lee wrote: Hi, I am Libre office user on Mac OS. Above all, I really appreciate to you guys' adventure and entrepreneurship to develop this kind of useful Open source software that is extremely helpful for Mac OS user. Documents written through MS office are always the source of problem to handle based on Mac OS. However, after I used your S/W, then it became much easier and I can get rid of burden regarding those stuff. The reason why I write this letter is to ask you about the security of this software, I think since it is open source, so I am worrying about the security and possibility of being attacked by hacker and virus. I am very sensitive toward security and I do not want my documents sent to the hacker later. Can I make myself easy about the concern? And, does this software work independently like MS office and is it Off-line program? or Does it work through cloud service system, API, and Online based system? I wish you will not misunderstand my message, I just want to confirm the structure of the program regarding security that is my priority concern. And, separated from my question, I sincerely respect your effort. Hope to receive your reply. Thanks for your development. Best wishes, Alexander -- Jean-Louis Oneto email: jl.on...@free.fr -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] RE : Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Microsoft Revisits the '80s With MS-DOS, Word for Windows Source Code,
The first floppies where 8", single sided, single density and were lade for punch card substitute: the 80kB capacity was then equivalent to a rack of 1000 80 columns punched cards. That was in the early 1970's. Before that, there was 14" amovible HDD, with a capacity of 2.5 MB, made by several manufacturer, IBM, CDC... The DRI CP/M80 then CP/M86 were nothing but vaporware, only the MP/M86 (multitasking variant of CP/M86) never had a real existence. When Microsoft bought DRI, they were only able to add some bugs to a perfectly healthy OS. Sadly, they were a lot better in marketing, and they took over the market. You know the rest of the story :-( Best regards, Jean-Louis Oneto Envoyé depuis un mobile Samsung Message d'origine De : Jim Seymour Date :05/04/2014 21:05 (GMT+01:00) A : users@global.libreoffice.org Objet : Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Microsoft Revisits the '80s With MS-DOS, Word for Windows Source Code, On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 13:57:48 -0400 James Knott wrote: > Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote: > > On 04/04/2014 05:56 PM, CVAlkan wrote: > >> Not sure if my recollections are correct, but I don't believe > >> either DOS (before 2.x) or the DOS version of Word were written > >> by Microsoft. I seem to > >> recall that both were purchased and re-branded. > > DOS was bought from Seattle Computer Products and it was originally > intended to be a hardware test system, while waiting for CP/M-86, > rather than a proper OS. > > Do not remember 8 inch ones. I remember 10 inch, and then the 5.x > > inch ones. [single sided and then double sided] > > > > The first floppies, as invented by IBM, were 8". There never were > 10" floppies. > > 8", 5-1/4", then 3-1/2". The first Winchester drives were 10", IIRC. DOS *was* originally designed and written by SCP, but I do not recall it being a "test" system. Digital Research was essentially ignoring the new Intel processors, and the people that formed SCP finally got tired of waiting for something that showed no signs of ever happening, and created what became DOS. That was half of a double-screw up by Gary Kildall, who formed and led DRI. The 2nd screw-up (this story is apocryphal) was him leaving visitors from IBM to meet with his wife, rather than him. IBM decided DRI was not serious, stopped in to see Gates, Gates bought "DOS," and the rest is history. So is DRI. I still have a well-thumbed and somewhat yellowed CP/M 1.4 User's Manual on my bookshelf :) Says "Distributed by Lifeboat Associates" on it. Anybody remember them? Regards, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Huge security bugs
When I see a sender email address that translate to "you kill me you
make me good [@gmail.com]", I think that been suspicious of trolling is
the least we can do ;-{
Regards from France,
Jean-Louis
On 29/10/2013 13:17, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Even if/when it is a trollish post i think we should still try to deal with
it as though it were legitimate. There are obviously 3rd party issues at
play with this case (assuming the situation really occurred (which i
personally doubt)) so we 'should' just address those issues.
Trolls win when they stir-up anything, particularly if it could be read as
bullying or unpleasant responses. Minor wins are if they stir up debate on
whether their claims are legit or not. Also if they can convince people to
spend much time on their 'issues'.
In this thread, if it was a troll, we have handed them at least a
triple-win and we really didn't need to do any of that. If it wasn't a
troll then we have done even worse. I'm not saying i was any better than
anyone because i feel i fell into the trap too.
I think we need to focus more on getting good answers out there and back-up
assertions with links if possible. Also a lot of us need to keep our
answers shorter and more on-topic. Ok, that is soemthing i need to pay
more attention to in my own posts but there are a few other people doing
the same thing too. Just my own thoughts. Live and learn right?
Regards from
Tom :)
On 29 October 2013 09:36, e-letter wrote:
On 28/10/2013, Jan wrote:
Today in good faith I downloaded and for trial your Libre Office pack.
The fact that to date, you have failed to answer _any_ of the
questions made by others, suggests that your original post was totally
unjustified. Had you made such allegations to a commercial entity, you
would possible face legal action for defamation.
You should have the honour to retract your original claim.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
--
Jean-Louis Oneto
email: jl.on...@free.fr
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: how to crack a PW in LO?
I used the following: http://www.crackpdf.com/ but not the Pro version which allows to make brute force attack, but then, they warn you that it will take _a_long_time_ !!! To remove simple protections, it was really fast, but they unlock the file without retrieving the password (or at least they don't display it) Reards, Jean-Louis On 16/10/2012 00:23, Dr. R. O Stapf wrote: On 16.10.2012 03:32, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) The trick is to try to remember what you might have been thinking about at the time. If that's even possible for anyone! There is no password cracking functionality or Extension for LO it's just the inept way MS fails to implement security. Just double-click on an xls or open LO and drop the xls into it or open LO and choose File - Open to navigate to and open the xls. File opens. My company's finance department asked me to add something to one of their spreadsheets but 'forgot' to tell me the password. One of them rushed down to give me the password but was somewhat mortified to find i had already made the change without having the slightest idea that there even was a password. There was a very cofusing conversation where neither of us had a clue what the other was talking about until i figured it out. The company still uses Excel and still attempts to 'protect' those spreadsheets with passwords that don't work. Occasionally people give me other files they want cracked which gives me a morale dilemma each time. Usually i just give a really half-hearted non-effort and then fob them off. Regards from Tom :) --- On Mon, 15/10/12, Dr. R. O Stapf wrote: From: Dr. R. O Stapf Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: how to crack a PW in LO? To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Monday, 15 October, 2012, 15:30 On 15.10.2012 23:11, Andreas Säger wrote: Am 15.10.2012 15:49, rost52 wrote: LO files can be protected with PWs when doing "save as". Fighting currently with an xls file and its lost PW, I wonder how LO files can be cracked? Can the MS related PW remover be used for LO as well? Thanks in advance for comments. xls does not encript your document. The only thing that gets encrypted is the password. Any old version of OpenOffice.org opens a password "protected" xls ignoring the password. Thanks for the information. It seems that my version of LO 3.5.6.2 is too young to ignore the PW of an xls file. However, my question was how to open an LO file if the PW get forgotten (not and MS file)? Hints are welcome for the future. Thanks to all of you providing me with lots of hints on not to forget passwords or prepare in advance for it. The SW I am using to crack an xls-file runs already for more than 60 h in the background. It's a nothing to loose only to win job. 6 or 8 digits alphanumeric no special characters is the PW used. Thereafter I will make a test cracking an LO file. The only thing which makes me wonder is that there are PW removing SW commercially availabe which run demos and claim within 10 - 30 sec they could remove the PW but open the xls file only when I purchase a full license. Does someone has experience with such a SW? -- Jean-Louis Oneto email: jl.on...@free.fr -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: register true origins
Back in 1973, I had was working in the US on a camera-ready book composition, and I was given the "Pocket Pal, a graphic artsproduction handbook", from International Paper Company (10th edition (1970), 3rd printing, rev. January 1973. (the original edition is 1934) as a reference book for english typesetting terminology (I am French and my Polish is very basic :-) , and even if I cannot claim six-quarter printer ancestry, I have some knowledge of printing technologies, from composing stick using mobile lead typefaces to latest digital ones.) In the "graphic arts terms" glossary, there are the following entries: * register: Fitting of two or more printing images on the sae paper in exact alignment with each other. * register marks: Crosses or other devices applied to original copy prior to photography. Used for positioning negatives in register, or for register of two or more colors in process printing. The term "registration" is also used in image processing in a close meaning: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_registration Best regards, Jean-Louis On 08/08/2012 16:32, Andrew Brager wrote: On 8/7/2012 7:11 PM, Brian Barker wrote: At 12:39 07/08/2012 -0700, Andrew Brager wrote: Yet, it fails to answer my original question which is where do the words "register true" come from, and to extend and clarify the question - how did register true come to mean "aligning baselines"? I think that bit's fairly easy. According to the dictionary, one sense of "register" as a noun is "a state of proper alignment" and as a verb "to adjust so as to be properly aligned" or "to be in proper alignment". And "true" similarly can mean as an adjective "accurately placed", and as an adverb "precisely" or "exactly". So "register true" can mean "align exactly" or "precise alignment". (There's nothing about baselines - but we're talking about vertical alignment, so what else could you align?) Brian Barker While I don't doubt your research (I essentially said the same thing in an example - to wit: /I'd be somewhat satisfied if I saw in a book somewhere that was describing the finer points of typesetting or some such, and it simply stated something to the effect of "when they used to set type on the presses built in the early 1900's, they would first align the baselines of all the typeface thingys, and then say to somebody 'it registers true, you may print it'". /) The problem is you're guessing, as was I. If you said to me something like "I've been a typesetter for 45 years, and my daddy was a typesetter before me and before that my granddaddy before him and we always used to align baselines and we called it register true, I don't know why we just did"... well, that at least carry's some ring of authority. If you'd of added "Back in them days register meant 'align' and true meant 'precise', ok that closes the circle. Finis. In lieu of that, a book from a confirmed authority stating something similar would be preferable. It's not that I'm unwilling to accept your explanation, I just would of preferred hearing it from an authoritative source, such that it's undeniable. At this point I'm willing to drop the matter, other than to say I still vote for a change in name from "register true" to "align baselines" simply because it's more clear - at least to me. Thanks to everyone that participated in the discussion. I'll take a look at the links previously provided perhaps they'll give me the answers I'm seeking, but regardless I declare this thread dead & buried. -- Jean-Louis Oneto e-mail: jl.on...@free.fr -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Top posting
I fully agree with Tom and this list sounds more and more like a dictatorship-governed one: do it my way of f*ck off. I will probably f*ck off very soon, LO/OO seems more and more to be a lot less _Open_ than M$ stuff, and I hate they approach! Jean-Louis On 23/02/2012 18:57, Tom Davies wrote: Hi Marc It's not worth flogging a dead horse. He will not attempt to consider anyone else's point of view and if you dare to disagree he will just block you too. Hmmm, it might be wrth aiming for that now i think about it. There is, of course, only ever 1 way to view things and that's your own way, whoever you are. Something i usually like about OpenSource is that it usually allows each of us to follow our own different ways and yet all still be right at the same time even if it all looks completely different. Vive le difference (sorry my French is appalling) ^^--la... but your French is not that much appaling, probably less than my English :-) [just to show that I'm also able to do inline posting, but I doubt that any body will ever read that! . How about "Diversity breeds serendipity!" as a sort of 'war'-cry? Regards from Tom :) --- On Thu, 23/2/12, Tanstaafl wrote: From: Tanstaafl Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Top posting To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 23 February, 2012, 18:50 On 2012-02-23 10:17 AM, Marc Grober wrote: It would appear that true professionals should, as I think Tom has suggested, consider the actual guidelines that is precisely the point... the list guidelines for this list are to bottom post with appropriate trimming (aka inline-posting), and Tom routinely and arrogantly ignores them because he is too lazy to be bothered. as opposed to pontificating upon them as if they were running a gulag Haven't seen anyone do that, and I certainly wasn't... I merely asked Tom to please stop BREAKING inline posted threads by top-posting in them, and he responded with his same old tired irrelevant BULLSHIT. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- Jean-Louis Oneto e-mail: jl.on...@free.fr -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice Hangul (Korean) Font
Under Windows, yhere is BabelMap which can display all the details (including number of glyph per block) of your Unicode font collection: http://www.babelstone.co.uk/Software/BabelMap.html Jean-Louis Le 05/09/2011 12:38, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions a écrit : On 09/05/2011 02:22 AM, Tom Browder wrote: On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 08:09, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote: I Google-ed the name. There are galleries showing the font in Unicode fonts. Is the font just Hangul? or does it contain others as well. Usually it is a Unicode font. I would choose the fonts you like from the gallery display and see if you can get it free. Some of then seem to be free. Here is the gallery I am looking at. http://www.wazu.jp/gallery/Fonts_Korean.html I have been to that site before and many of the links are dead--but others are good. Thanks. -Tom Yes, some/many are dead, but you can see the look and "feel" of the fonts and then Google the font names to download them. To be honest, Arial Unicode seems to have the most glyphs. Having a dedicated Korean font would be great, but it can be hard do decide which one is best without some viewing software [FontForge on Ubuntu] that will show the characters. LibreOffice has a Insert Special Characters option that allow you to go to the different subsets - like Hangul. Actually Arial Unicode has 12+ different Hangul subsets. Do you know what the font name your friend or business associate uses on his system? It would be nice to know that. Otherwise, you will need to find as many Korean fonts, or Unicode ones with Hangul/Korean glyphs in it. "UnBatang" was the free font that was listed in a Wiki page for Korean Fonts. Microsoft's version is "Batang". See if this image has the glyphs "style" you want. http://libreoffice-na.us/other/UnBatang-Hangul.png -- Jean-Louis Oneto e-mail: jl.on...@free.fr -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] IPA Font in LibreOffice
There is also a lot of goodies on the sitye of the IPA:
http://www.langsci.ucl.ac.uk/ipa/ipafonts.html
and IPA keyboards softwares on the SIL site:
http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?&item_id=UniIPAKeyboard
Regards,
Jean-Louis
Le 04/09/2011 13:38, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions a écrit :
Well, there is a LaTeX extensions for Writer, if that helps.
phonetics?
If I remember right, Arial Unicode has phonetic glyphs in it.
Use Arial Unicode font in Insert>"Special Character" and choose IPA
Extensions for the subset? There are 92 glyphs listed there.
Then there are the dedicated Phonetic fonts. You still will need to
use the Insert Special Character option.
http://www.font-zone.com/download.php?fid=1569
http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/hayes/Fonts/
http://www.unc.edu/~jlsmith/ipa-fonts.html
http://www.omniglot.com/writing/ipa.htm
On 09/04/2011 07:31 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
What format is the font? ttf or something?
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Manuel Kaufmann
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Sat, 3 September, 2011 20:11:10
Subject: [libreoffice-users] IPA Font in LibreOffice
Hello,
I'm having an issue with the IPA font in LibreOffice. I'm using the
"TeX tipatt8" font I was doing all my text transcription to the
corresponding phonetics symbols without any problem.
But now, I'm trying to mark the allophones into my transcription. I
found this Manual[1] that explains how to use this font with LaTeX,
but I couldn't do it with LibreOffice.
I tried with LaTeX and I could without any problem. Check the image
below:
* http://www.diigo.com/item/image/1msf9/r7xp?size=o
Can you help me?
I'm trying to add that symbol to my transcriptions. Just in case, this
is the LaTeX code that I'm using to generate that image:
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt,english]{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{tipa}
\begin{document}
\textipa{D\u{eI}}
\end{document}
THANKS IN ADVANCE!
[1] www.tex.ac.uk/CTAN/obsolete/fonts/tipa/tipaman.ps
--
Jean-Louis Oneto
e-mail: jl.on...@free.fr
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] IPA Font in LibreOffice
Hello,
Do you know this site:
http://www.sil.org/computing/catalog/show_software_catalog.asp?by=cat&name=Font
they have a lot of fonts, mostly free, including IPA fonts.
HTH,
Regards,
Jean-Louis
Le 03/09/2011 19:11, Manuel Kaufmann a écrit :
Hello,
I'm having an issue with the IPA font in LibreOffice. I'm using the
"TeX tipatt8" font I was doing all my text transcription to the
corresponding phonetics symbols without any problem.
But now, I'm trying to mark the allophones into my transcription. I
found this Manual[1] that explains how to use this font with LaTeX,
but I couldn't do it with LibreOffice.
I tried with LaTeX and I could without any problem. Check the image below:
* http://www.diigo.com/item/image/1msf9/r7xp?size=o
Can you help me?
I'm trying to add that symbol to my transcriptions. Just in case, this
is the LaTeX code that I'm using to generate that image:
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt,english]{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{tipa}
\begin{document}
\textipa{D\u{eI}}
\end{document}
THANKS IN ADVANCE!
[1] www.tex.ac.uk/CTAN/obsolete/fonts/tipa/tipaman.ps
--
Jean-Louis Oneto
e-mail: jl.on...@free.fr
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Document rendering flaw in LibreOffice
Hi :-) ! With all the problems I had with MS software, (one of the las was with Word XP which forced me to migrate to OO then LO), I can easily believe that they unable to implement their own standards, but that doesn't imply that there is not a marketing strategy behind! :-( Regards, Jean-Louis Le 28/08/2011 01:00, Tom Davies a écrit : Hi :) I think it depends on whether you mean the implementation as actually used in MS Office 2007& 2010 or the theoretical standard as agreed by various organisations. Why MS do not seem to have followed the standard they drew-up could possibly be a marketing ploy, or at least perceived as such. Either that or they are inept at implementing their own standard. Either way it does not inspire confidence in using their new formats especially when they don't work and their old formats do. Regards from Tom :) ____ From: Jean-Louis Oneto To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Sun, 28 August, 2011 0:38:44 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Document rendering flaw in LibreOffice Hi Tom! I'm surprised with that: IFAIK, the docx format was just the opposite: the (XML) Open Format reply of Microsoft to the banning of proprietary formats (the old .doc formats were especially targeted...) by the governments of a lot of countries, starting with the USA, Japan, several European countries...: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Docx I suppose that if Microsoft made available a converter pack (with read and WRITE capabilities), it was also not entirely for avoiding people to buy the new versions of MSO... Best regards, Jean-Louis Le 27/08/2011 20:39, Tom Davies a écrit : Hi :) If you can then please stick with the .doc format and avoid the .docX. The newer format is proprietary and was designed to be incompatible with non-MS Office programs including LibreOffice. Regards from Tom :) From: Rogier F. van Vlissingen To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Sat, 27 August, 2011 21:10:41 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Document rendering flaw in LibreOffice I have one document, with some very simple graphic components in it, which is refusing to load in LibreOffice Writer. It has a few simple boxes in the layout, and it just suppresses them. The problem goes away when I save them as a .doc in lieu of .docx Any suggestions? --Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ --For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- Jean-Louis Oneto e-mail: jl.on...@free.fr -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Document rendering flaw in LibreOffice
Hi Tom! I'm surprised with that: IFAIK, the docx format was just the opposite: the (XML) Open Format reply of Microsoft to the banning of proprietary formats (the old .doc formats were especially targeted...) by the governments of a lot of countries, starting with the USA, Japan, several European countries...: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Docx I suppose that if Microsoft made available a converter pack (with read and WRITE capabilities), it was also not entirely for avoiding people to buy the new versions of MSO... Best regards, Jean-Louis Le 27/08/2011 20:39, Tom Davies a écrit : Hi :) If you can then please stick with the .doc format and avoid the .docX. The newer format is proprietary and was designed to be incompatible with non-MS Office programs including LibreOffice. Regards from Tom :) From: Rogier F. van Vlissingen To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Sat, 27 August, 2011 21:10:41 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Document rendering flaw in LibreOffice I have one document, with some very simple graphic components in it, which is refusing to load in LibreOffice Writer. It has a few simple boxes in the layout, and it just suppresses them. The problem goes away when I save them as a .doc in lieu of .docx Any suggestions? --Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ --For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- Jean-Louis Oneto e-mail: jl.on...@free.fr -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: List Box Form Control changing Source Cell Range
Le 22/08/2011 08:26, Johnny Rosenberg a écrit : 2011/8/22 Jean-Louis Oneto: Hello, I didn't notice the link to example file at first glance, but the alternative of using the Data Validation tool is really very powerful! I would never found it by myself without your example! It is really an nice solution and it surely deserve a better publicity in the doc. Thanks a lot to all of you, Jean-Louis Maybe it deserves a better name in the menu? But unfortunately I have no suggestions, at least not yet… I feel that the validation tool is just well named: the problem is rather that it can make so many different things that it is diffucuilt if non impossible to find a "better" name! My problem was rather the opposite: I always considered that the "Data" menu contained almost only tools for... "databases" (or at least data sources, including reformating of CSV data... That was partly why I didn't understand why "Controls" were made for databases, and why I had to avoid "controls" in the first place. My first think was rather the opposite: use the controls for simple tasks on calc sheets, and use "Data menu" items for "databases". This was sustained by the fact that most of the "Data" tools just ask you to connect to a database! May be it should be the control tools which should be renamed (or just suppressed as some people suggested) ? Regards, Jean-Louis -- Jean-Louis Oneto e-mail: jl.on...@free.fr -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: List Box Form Control changing Source Cell Range
Hello, I didn't notice the link to example file at first glance, but the alternative of using the Data Validation tool is really very powerful! I would never found it by myself without your example! It is really an nice solution and it surely deserve a better publicity in the doc. Thanks a lot to all of you, Jean-Louis - Original Message - From: "Andreas Säger" To: Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 7:30 PM Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: List Box Form Control changing Source Cell Range menu:Data>Validation... Accept: accepts any formula expression including calculated references: http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/download/file.php?id=333 -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/List-Box-Form-Control-changing-Source-Cell-Range-tp3270318p3271238.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Problem with combo box
Le 15/08/2011 16:55, Andreas Säger a écrit : Am 15.08.2011 11:37, Jean-Louis Oneto wrote: Hello, I tried to define a combo box in Scalc which take its source cell range from a table. When I enter the cell reference directly, it works as expected. I defined a name for the table, but when I try to used it instead of the direct cell reference, I just get a blank combo box. I tried several syntax like 'name', ='name' but that doen't make any difference. I tried that both under version 3.3.3 (on Windows XP Pro 32 bit) and version 3.4.2 (on Windows 7 64 bit) as well as OpenOffice v3.3.0: That doesn't make any difference either. Is there a way to make that works? (In fact the original file was made with MS Excel XP) Thanks in advance, Jean-Louis Don't use form controls with spreadsheets. They are made for database input in the first place. menu:Data>Validation... Accept: ... does the trick accepting any formula expression, even calculated references to dynamic ranges. When you turn off the error message, you get the same behaviour as a combo, which is just a text box with auto-complete suggestions. Unlike form controls, this spreadsheet variant of a combo box can be copied across ranges. Hope this helps, Andreas In fact I had found a very similar thread (with a very similar answer...) in the OO forum: http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=38322&p=175957&hilit=combo+box#p175957 but the problem is that in either case I am unable to understand the solution.: I was able to define a Data:Validation..Accept:CellRange, but only if I'm not in Form creation mode, otherwise all the entries of the Data mennue are greyed out. And if define a CellRange with a name, then I'm unable to use it in the combo box (or a list box) I don't understand either why there are controls in Scalc which are supposed to be left unused. And with all the hectic thread about Base and databases, I even feel that if I should avoid something, that would be... databases! Besides that, I just need to choose a set of parameters from list of less than ten entries, and I would feel like overkill to build a database for that! -- Jean-Louis Oneto e-mail: jl.on...@free.fr -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Problem with combo box
Hello, I tried to define a combo box in Scalc which take its source cell range from a table. When I enter the cell reference directly, it works as expected. I defined a name for the table, but when I try to used it instead of the direct cell reference, I just get a blank combo box. I tried several syntax like 'name', ='name' but that doen't make any difference. I tried that both under version 3.3.3 (on Windows XP Pro 32 bit) and version 3.4.2 (on Windows 7 64 bit) as well as OpenOffice v3.3.0: That doesn't make any difference either. Is there a way to make that works? (In fact the original file was made with MS Excel XP) Thanks in advance, Jean-Louis -- Jean-Louis Oneto e-mail: jl.on...@free.fr -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Problem using a name as Source cell range in a combo box control
Hello, I tried to define a combo box in Scalc which take its source cell range from a table. When I enter the cell reference directly, it works as expected. I defined a name for the table, but when I try to used it instead of the direct cell reference, I just get a blank combo box. I tried several syntax like 'name', ='name' but that doen't make any difference. I tried that both under version 3.3.3 (on Windows XP Pro 32 bit) and version 3.4.2 (on Windows 7 64 bit). That doesn't make any difference either. Is there a way to make that works? (In fact the original file was made with MS Excel XP) Thanks in advance, Jean-Louis -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
