Re: [libreoffice-users] Are there solutions for starting LO 4.1.2.3 without java on OSX 10.9 where OSX upgrade as been done on LO with JVM selected
On 10/31/2013 09:56 PM, Marc Grober wrote: [...] Marc, can you please stick to a single thread on this mailing list on the topic of LO+Java+Mavericks? Stephan -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Are there solutions for starting LO 4.1.2.3 without java on OSX 10.9 where OSX upgrade as been done on LO with JVM selected
It would seem that there are just a few options that a user might have after they have upgraded to Mavericks (and I think it is critical pending a resolution of the situatin that LO advise users NOT to upgrade (especially if they have not turned use JVM off) without restoring 10.8 -- the most like require the ability to access LO to turn off Use JVM... so, 1) Is there a way to start LO 4.1.2.3 from the command line with a --withoutJVM switch 2) Is there a way to edit a preferences or set up file that will turn off JVM usage (whatever impact that may have other the remaining functionality of the product 3) If not, is there a way to remove a preferences or settings file to that end and of course will any of those options result being able to bring LO up or will the Foundation issue an update quick enough to render this discussion moot? -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
