Hi :)
Base is often quite quirky and has different quirks in different releases with
confusions and regressions too! It's not got any devs actively working on it
right now but hopefully some people will start taking up the challenge and gain
a lot of respect by moving into this very difficult area! That said, most of
Base works fine and it's great where it does work.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Zak McKracken
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Tue, 12 July, 2011 21:44:43
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Re: Feature request: native BibTeX support
Am 12.07.2011, 01:17 Uhr, schrieb planas :
> An alternative is to use Base. I have been thinking on these lines so I
> will look into it more.
I am using base for my literature database, but it has serious drawbacks. You
can use the built-in LO literature database (which isn't portable), or you can
set up a new one, which will let you include stuff you think is useful but not
conetained in the original. You can register that as a data source and start
using it, but as soon as you want to edit any entry from within writer, it will
tell you that it can't associate the db entries with the properties the
literature module expects. So what I did was copy the existing db, add a few
more fields and work with that, but I still had to re-asiciate all the db
categories anew. And even though I stored it in the same directory as the
document I used it for, if I copy that directory elswehere, the game starts
anew.
If I change one of the entries in the db, I have to remove the citation from
the
document and re-insert it before it updates in the literature index. If you
have
cited it multiple times and you misclick once, be prepared for additional fun.
Ok, so aside from ranting about stuff I haven't done myself and should be
thankful for instead of criticizing:
What should be doable (I speculate) is to construct something that will import
bibtex into the OO-database, maybe even link the database to a bitex file (or
several)? So if you change your bibtex file, the db will update, including
establishing new categories, properties and the like.
What should also be done is improve the literature workflow. There is certainly
something to improve there.
I do not use a plugin for citations because I prefer to have all done within
one
program (actually If I restarted my current project right now, I'd probably use
a plugin, but now most of the stuff is in LO's database, and I won't undo
that),
and would welcome not having to copy/paste bibtex entries into the literature
DB
by hand. I'll also welcome any improvement of LO's bibliography module.
Zak
--Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmas...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmas...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
