Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Stuck with 3.3 forever?

2011-12-13 Thread JOE CONNER

SNIP

On 12/4/2011 1:18 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:

2011/12/3 Jay Lozierjsloz...@gmail.com:

On 12/03/2011 12:50 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
If you enter a number in A1, A3 displays that number+27. If you don't,
A3 displays an error message: ”#VALUE!” (I guess; I didn't test this
particular example…). I want it to display 27.



Thanks anyway for trying to help. :)


Kind regards

Johnny Rosenberg
ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ


You could use this kind of formula structure:
  =IF(ISNUMBER(A1),A1+27,)   (without the quotes).
This should do what you want.

Joe Conner, Poulsbo, WA USA

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Stuck with 3.3 forever?

2011-12-04 Thread Johnny Rosenberg
2011/12/3 Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com:
 On 12/03/2011 12:50 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:

 2011/12/3 Pedropedl...@gmail.com:

 Johnny Rosenberg wrote

 Depending on the value in other cells, the result can be a time or an
 empty string (). In this case, E9 is an empty string, so E10 becomes
 ”#VALUE!”, and in fact every cell below E10 is also ”#VALUE!” because
 of this.

 Can you provide an example file? This used to be a problem but it is
 fixed
 in 3.4.4 (at least under Windows)

 I could, but it's not needed, I think. I just did this simple test in
 3.3.4 and 3.4.4:

 Open LibreOffice Calc from scratch.

 A1:
 =

 A2:
 =A1+1

 In LibreOffice 3.3.4 (Ubuntu 10.10), A2 displays:
 1

 In 3.4.4 (Ubuntu 11.10), OOO340m1 (Build:402), A2 displays:
 #VALUE!

 Try in A1 no data/empty cell and in A2 =A1+1, you will get 1 in A2.

Well, I know that, of course. And that's not a part of the problem.
The problem occurs when a cell is set to an empty string. Older
versions considered the value empty strings to be 0, which was very
elegant. That feature now seems to be gone.

 You are
 adding a text and number and the + operator is not used for concatenation.

Very good, because concatenation is not what I want in this case.


 This has to do with operator overloading, are other, similar, operations
 allowed when using '+'. Some may allow it and others may not, restricting
 its use to mathematical operations only. LO uses the '' operator for
 concatenation.


Which I use all the time when I want concatenation, which I don't in this case.

 If you use A1 =  and A2 = A1  1 you get 1.

Yes, but if A1=75, I get 751 and not 76, so that's not the ultimate
workaround in this case.

The point is that ALL of the cells in a certain column contains a
formula that, depending of other cells, give either an empty string as
result, or a numerical value.

Let's create another example:
Let's use A1 for manual input.
In A2, enter:
=IF(A1=;;A1)
In A3, enter:
=A2+27

If you enter a number in A1, A3 displays that number+27. If you don't,
A3 displays an error message: ”#VALUE!” (I guess; I didn't test this
particular example…). I want it to display 27.



Thanks anyway for trying to help. :)


Kind regards

Johnny Rosenberg
ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Stuck with 3.3 forever?

2011-12-04 Thread Johnny Rosenberg
2011/12/3 Pedro pedl...@gmail.com:

 Johnny Rosenberg wrote

 I could agree with that, but it would have been nice if they thought
 of that since 1.0 and not changing it on the way, breaking a whole lot
 of spreadsheets…


 I see your point. But this was wrong.
 It's not a change of plans it's simply a correction. And not fixing it would
 break a lot of other spreadsheets ;)


 Johnny Rosenberg wrote

 Is there another way to make A2 look empty in
 this case, making it useable for calculations? Something like the
 following:
 =IF(A1=6;SomethingNiceToPutHere;B1)


 There are at least two ways: add an extra IF to the following formula and
 use ISTEXT to validate or replace SomethingNiceToPutHere by 0 (zero) and use
 conditional formatting to hide the zeros (set the font to White or the cell
 background color when the value is zero)

 If you liked the way it worked before you can use =N() as suggested by
 Miguel Angel.

Seems like the N() function is the best solution in this case then.
Using a test every time I want to use a cell that MIGHT be an empty
string would make my formulas ridiculously long, and most of them are
quite long already.
Another solution would of course be to create a new cell formula with
LibreOffice Basic, that  takes care of everything, but I guess it
would be rather slow, which I think would be noticeable in my case
since I we are talking about thousands of rows here.

The answer I was hoping for in this case, about if there was a way to
make a cell look empty, was that there is maybe some function to use
or something, something like EMPTYCELL():
=IF(Something;EMTYCELL();AnotherCell+AThirdCell)
Which is not a good idea, because if I empty the cell, I guess its
formula will be erased too… :P

Well, never mind, I think I'll go with N() anyway now. Short and simple.


Kind regards

Johnny Rosenberg
ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] Re: Stuck with 3.3 forever?

2011-12-03 Thread Pedro

Johnny Rosenberg wrote
 
 Depending on the value in other cells, the result can be a time or an
 empty string (). In this case, E9 is an empty string, so E10 becomes
 ”#VALUE!”, and in fact every cell below E10 is also ”#VALUE!” because
 of this.
 

Can you provide an example file? This used to be a problem but it is fixed
in 3.4.4 (at least under Windows)

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Stuck-with-3-3-forever-tp3557428p3557454.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Stuck with 3.3 forever?

2011-12-03 Thread Johnny Rosenberg
2011/12/3 Pedro pedl...@gmail.com:

 Johnny Rosenberg wrote

 Depending on the value in other cells, the result can be a time or an
 empty string (). In this case, E9 is an empty string, so E10 becomes
 ”#VALUE!”, and in fact every cell below E10 is also ”#VALUE!” because
 of this.


 Can you provide an example file? This used to be a problem but it is fixed
 in 3.4.4 (at least under Windows)

I could, but it's not needed, I think. I just did this simple test in
3.3.4 and 3.4.4:

Open LibreOffice Calc from scratch.

A1:
=

A2:
=A1+1

In LibreOffice 3.3.4 (Ubuntu 10.10), A2 displays:
1

In 3.4.4 (Ubuntu 11.10), OOO340m1 (Build:402), A2 displays:
#VALUE!



Kind regards

Johnny Rosenberg
ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ


 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Stuck-with-3-3-forever-tp3557428p3557454.html
 Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 --
 For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] Re: Stuck with 3.3 forever?

2011-12-03 Thread Pedro

Johnny Rosenberg wrote
 
 I could, but it's not needed, I think. I just did this simple test in
 3.3.4 and 3.4.4:
 
 Open LibreOffice Calc from scratch.
 
 A1:
 =
 
 A2:
 =A1+1
 
 In LibreOffice 3.3.4 (Ubuntu 10.10), A2 displays:
 1
 
 In 3.4.4 (Ubuntu 11.10), OOO340m1 (Build:402), A2 displays:
 #VALUE!
 

That is expected. Cell A1 contains an empty text string (not a value). When
you try to do a calculation with a text string you get an error. MS Excel
also displays #VALUE

TBH I think it was version 3.3.4 that was wrong...

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Stuck-with-3-3-forever-tp3557428p3557511.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Re: Stuck with 3.3 forever?

2011-12-03 Thread David S. Crampton
I agree with Pedro. A null text is not to be treated as a numeric zero. An
empty cell may be calculated as a zero but a null text is not an empty cell. 
If have found the #VALUE result of mixing null text within a calculation to
be a good debugging and alert technique that the values elsewhere in my
spreadsheet have become messed up.

-
--
David S. Crampton
--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Stuck-with-3-3-forever-tp3557428p3557547.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Stuck with 3.3 forever?

2011-12-03 Thread Johnny Rosenberg
2011/12/3 David S. Crampton david_cramp...@ie2b.com:
 I agree with Pedro. A null text is not to be treated as a numeric zero. An
 empty cell may be calculated as a zero but a null text is not an empty cell.
 If have found the #VALUE result of mixing null text within a calculation to
 be a good debugging and alert technique that the values elsewhere in my
 spreadsheet have become messed up.

I could agree with that, but it would have been nice if they thought
of that since 1.0 and not changing it on the way, breaking a whole lot
of spreadsheets…


Let's assume we have this example:
A2:
=IF(A1=6;;B1)

Now, in some cases, A2 will be an empty string, so =A2+1 will fail in
another cell, right? Is there another way to make A2 look empty in
this case, making it useable for calculations? Something like the
following:
=IF(A1=6;SomethingNiceToPutHere;B1)



Kind regards

Johnny Rosenberg
ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ



 -
 --
 David S. Crampton
 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Stuck-with-3-3-forever-tp3557428p3557547.html
 Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 --
 For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Stuck with 3.3 forever?

2011-12-03 Thread Jay Lozier

On 12/03/2011 12:50 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:

2011/12/3 Pedropedl...@gmail.com:

Johnny Rosenberg wrote

Depending on the value in other cells, the result can be a time or an
empty string (). In this case, E9 is an empty string, so E10 becomes
”#VALUE!”, and in fact every cell below E10 is also ”#VALUE!” because
of this.


Can you provide an example file? This used to be a problem but it is fixed
in 3.4.4 (at least under Windows)

I could, but it's not needed, I think. I just did this simple test in
3.3.4 and 3.4.4:

Open LibreOffice Calc from scratch.

A1:
=

A2:
=A1+1

In LibreOffice 3.3.4 (Ubuntu 10.10), A2 displays:
1

In 3.4.4 (Ubuntu 11.10), OOO340m1 (Build:402), A2 displays:
#VALUE!
Try in A1 no data/empty cell and in A2 =A1+1, you will get 1 in A2. You 
are adding a text and number and the + operator is not used for 
concatenation.


This has to do with operator overloading, are other, similar, operations 
allowed when using '+'. Some may allow it and others may not, 
restricting its use to mathematical operations only. LO uses the '' 
operator for concatenation.


If you use A1 =  and A2 = A1  1 you get 1.



Kind regards

Johnny Rosenberg
ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ


--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Stuck-with-3-3-forever-tp3557428p3557454.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



--
Jay Lozier
jsloz...@gmail.com


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] Re: Stuck with 3.3 forever?

2011-12-03 Thread Pedro

Johnny Rosenberg wrote
 
 I could agree with that, but it would have been nice if they thought
 of that since 1.0 and not changing it on the way, breaking a whole lot
 of spreadsheets…
 

I see your point. But this was wrong. 
It's not a change of plans it's simply a correction. And not fixing it would
break a lot of other spreadsheets ;)


Johnny Rosenberg wrote
 
 Is there another way to make A2 look empty in
 this case, making it useable for calculations? Something like the
 following:
 =IF(A1=6;SomethingNiceToPutHere;B1)
 

There are at least two ways: add an extra IF to the following formula and
use ISTEXT to validate or replace SomethingNiceToPutHere by 0 (zero) and use
conditional formatting to hide the zeros (set the font to White or the cell
background color when the value is zero)

If you liked the way it worked before you can use =N() as suggested by
Miguel Angel.

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Stuck-with-3-3-forever-tp3557428p3557738.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Stuck with 3.3 forever?

2011-12-03 Thread David S. Crampton

Expanding a bit on Jonny's concatenation:

A1:  (null string)
A2: 1 (numeric)
A3: =A1+A2 displays #VALUE
A4: =A1  A2 displays left-aligned 1. It is a text result.
A5: =A2 + A4 displays a right-aligned 2. It is a numeric result.

Ergo, the + operator gave #VALUE result when combining a null string and  
a numeric but gives a numeric when combining a text string which can be  
interpreted as a numeric with a numeric.


Per my mini-sermon (earlier today) on debugging and preferring strict  
type-based behavior, I would prefer A5 to also display #VALUE.

--
David S. Crampton

On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 12:08:20 -0800, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:


On 12/03/2011 12:50 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:

2011/12/3 Pedropedl...@gmail.com:

Johnny Rosenberg wrote

Depending on the value in other cells, the result can be a time or an
empty string (). In this case, E9 is an empty string, so E10 becomes
”#VALUE!”, and in fact every cell below E10 is also ”#VALUE!” because
of this.

Can you provide an example file? This used to be a problem but it is  
fixed

in 3.4.4 (at least under Windows)

I could, but it's not needed, I think. I just did this simple test in
3.3.4 and 3.4.4:

Open LibreOffice Calc from scratch.

A1:
=

A2:
=A1+1

In LibreOffice 3.3.4 (Ubuntu 10.10), A2 displays:
1

In 3.4.4 (Ubuntu 11.10), OOO340m1 (Build:402), A2 displays:
#VALUE!
Try in A1 no data/empty cell and in A2 =A1+1, you will get 1 in A2. You  
are adding a text and number and the + operator is not used for  
concatenation.


This has to do with operator overloading, are other, similar, operations  
allowed when using '+'. Some may allow it and others may not,  
restricting its use to mathematical operations only. LO uses the ''  
operator for concatenation.


If you use A1 =  and A2 = A1  1 you get 1.



Kind regards

Johnny Rosenberg
ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ


--
View this message in context:  
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Stuck-with-3-3-forever-tp3557428p3557454.html

Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:  
users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?  
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:  
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette

List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be  
deleted




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] Re: Stuck with 3.3 forever?

2011-12-03 Thread Pedro

David S. Crampton wrote
 
 Per my mini-sermon (earlier today) on debugging and preferring strict  
 type-based behavior, I would prefer A5 to also display #VALUE.
 

Obviously! If it behaves differently it's simply inconsistent.

It the user wants to change that he just has to do =A2+VALUE(A4)

If there is a voting somewhere you can count +1 on the strict (coherent,
consistent) behavior.

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Stuck-with-3-3-forever-tp3557428p3558054.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Stuck with 3.3 forever?

2011-12-03 Thread MiguelAngel
El 03/12/11 22:54, Pedro escribi:David S. Crampton wrotePer my mini-sermon 
(earlier today) on debugging and preferring strict  
type-based behavior, I would prefer A5 to also display #VALUE.Obviously! If it 
behaves differently it's simply inconsistent.


It the user wants to change that he just has to do =A2+VALUE(A4)


If there is a voting somewhere you can count +1 on the strict (coherent,
consistent) behavior.Also mine.But interpret text as number is only with direct 
reference, not
  for example in the middle of a SUM().Miguelngel..
-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Stuck with 3.3 forever?

2011-12-03 Thread MiguelAngel

El 03/12/11 22:54, Pedro escribió:

David S. Crampton wrote

Per my mini-sermon (earlier today) on debugging and preferring strict
type-based behavior, I would prefer A5 to also display #VALUE.


Obviously! If it behaves differently it's simply inconsistent.

It the user wants to change that he just has to do =A2+VALUE(A4)

If there is a voting somewhere you can count +1 on the strict (coherent,
consistent) behavior.


Also mine.
But interpret text as number is only with direct reference, not for 
example in the middle of a SUM().

Miguel Ángel.
.

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Stuck with 3.3 forever?

2011-12-03 Thread Jay Lozier

On 12/03/2011 04:39 PM, David S. Crampton wrote:

Expanding a bit on Jonny's concatenation:

A1:  (null string)
A2: 1 (numeric)
A3: =A1+A2 displays #VALUE
A4: =A1  A2 displays left-aligned 1. It is a text result.
A5: =A2 + A4 displays a right-aligned 2. It is a numeric result.

Ergo, the + operator gave #VALUE result when combining a null string 
and a numeric but gives a numeric when combining a text string which 
can be interpreted as a numeric with a numeric.


Per my mini-sermon (earlier today) on debugging and preferring strict 
type-based behavior, I would prefer A5 to also display #VALUE.
The default behavior appears to be an implicit type conversion of string 
to a numeric data type when it is possible. Either to an integer or 
decimal as needed. I tried your test using 1.356 (US format) in A2 and got


A# = #VALUE
A4 = 1.356 as string (left justified)
A5 = 2.356 as decimal (right justified)

If the there is any character that can not implicitly convert to a 
number, an error is thrown. This  probably dates back to the original 
spreadsheets (Visicalc and Lotus 123). For consistency one must follow 
some of the original, even if stupid, decisions so the average user is 
not confused and spreadsheets can be easily imported into other 
spreadsheet programs.


--
Jay Lozier
jsloz...@gmail.com


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted