Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-06 Thread Paul
If he's not being paid by MS, he should be...

But he's a well known troll around these parts, move along folks.
Unless there's useful info in the response, then it's worth spreading.


On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 21:02:55 +
P NIKOLIC  wrote:

> On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:59:33 +0700
> "Urmas"  wrote:
> 
> > "James Knott":
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AARD_code
> > 
> > Quote:
> > Microsoft disabled the AARD code for the final release of Windows
> > 3.1
> > 
> > It's a myth.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Do you actually work for mickeyshaft  seems that way you are backing
> them to the hilt ..
> 
> MS troll per chance ..
> 
> 
> Pete .
> 
> 


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-06 Thread P NIKOLIC
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:59:33 +0700
"Urmas"  wrote:

> "James Knott":
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AARD_code
> 
> Quote:
> Microsoft disabled the AARD code for the final release of Windows 3.1
> 
> It's a myth.
> 
> 

Do you actually work for mickeyshaft  seems that way you are backing them to the
hilt ..

MS troll per chance ..


Pete .


-- 
Linux 7-of-9 3.11.6-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Oct 18 23:22:36 CEST 2013 x86_64
GNU/Linux

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-06 Thread Paul
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:59:33 +0700
"Urmas"  wrote:

> "James Knott":
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AARD_code
> 
> Quote:
> Microsoft disabled the AARD code for the final release of Windows 3.1
> 
> It's a myth.

What is a myth, that Microsoft disabled the AARD code? :P

The AARD code is indeed *not* a myth, it was very real, it was just
disabled for the final release, according to Wikipedia.

That said, I clearly recall some Microsoft program not running on our
old DR-DOS system back in the day, can't recall if it was Windows or
Word (I'm sure it must have been one of those two), but it definitely
complained about our DOS not being good enough, which was completely
bogus. In many respects DR-DOS was much better than MS DOS, and it was
fully capable of running the MS software, despite the bogus claim of
said software.

The AARD code may have been disabled, but it wasn't the only piece of
malicious code they used.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-06 Thread Robert Holtzman
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:44:11AM +0700, Urmas wrote:
> "Paul":
> 
> >Microsoft, as the developers of the
> >OS, put code in their OS to capture the Ctrl+J key combination, and not
> >pass it on to the foreground application. However, they also put in
> >code to allow an application to request that the key combination be
> >passed on, code that most people, including the developers of WordStar,
> 
> >Or, alternatively, Microsoft, as the developers of the OS, put code in
> >to detect a running copy of WordStar, and hide the Ctrl+J key
> >combination from it.
> 
> >I'm not saying they did any of this,
> 
> So you've just made that malarkey up? Wow.

Hey, FUDmeister, what makes you such an authority?



-- 
Bob Holtzman
Your mail is being read by tight lipped 
NSA agents who fail to see humor in Doctor 
Strangelove 
Key ID 8D549279

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-06 Thread Dale Erwin

On 11/6/2013 12:59 PM, Urmas wrote:

"James Knott":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AARD_code

Quote:
Microsoft disabled the AARD code for the final release of Windows 3.1

It's a myth.




But they didn't remove it and it could always be reenabled by changing a 
single byte of machine code.


--
Dale Erwin
Jr. 28 de Julio 657, Depto. 03
Magdalena del Mar, Lima 17 PERU
http://leather.casaerwin.org


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-06 Thread Urmas

"James Knott":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AARD_code

Quote:
Microsoft disabled the AARD code for the final release of Windows 3.1

It's a myth.


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-06 Thread James Knott
Urmas wrote:
> "James Knott":
>
>> That AARD code was one.  They also used hidden API as was revealed when
>> Borland sued them and more.
>
> 'AARD code' was not in any retail version of Windows. It is fake.
>
>
>

Well, you 'd better thel that to the guys at DR-DOS and also those in
the antitrust case, as that was one of the things shown in it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AARD_code

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-06 Thread Urmas

"James Knott":


That AARD code was one.  They also used hidden API as was revealed when
Borland sued them and more.


'AARD code' was not in any retail version of Windows. It is fake.



--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-06 Thread James Knott
Urmas wrote:
> So you've just made that malarkey up? Wow.

He is correct in saying MS did a lot of things to cripple competition. 
That AARD code was one.  They also used hidden API as was revealed when
Borland sued them and more.  They have a very long history of playing
dirty, up to and including extortion.



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-06 Thread Urmas

"Don Myers":

Some  of the things Microsoft has done are chronicled here in a report
to the European Commission a number of years ago:

One cannot hold in a smile while reading that whine. In particular, the 
Wordstar case of 'shell namespace extensions', which a text processor (Even 
MS Office one) does not need was dismissed from the court as boloney. Also, 
a pay-for Netscape vs. free IE browser story is fascinating. 




--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-05 Thread Don Myers


On 11/05/2013 06:55 PM, Paul wrote:

On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 05:34:38 +0700
"Urmas"  wrote:


Simple. The evil machinations of Microsoft.

I will repeat. If any and all Windows application could use Ctrl+J
for anything, why WordStad suddenly couldn't?

Ok, let me spell it out for you. Microsoft, as the developers of the
OS, put code in their OS to capture the Ctrl+J key combination, and not
pass it on to the foreground application. However, they also put in
code to allow an application to request that the key combination be
passed on, code that most people, including the developers of WordStar,
didn't know about (at least until after it was too late). Then
Microsoft, as developers of Word, put in the necessary request to make
the OS pass on the Ctrl+J key combination to Word. They knew to do
this, because they were the same company.

Or, alternatively, Microsoft, as the developers of the OS, put code in
to detect a running copy of WordStar, and hide the Ctrl+J key
combination from it. They did this because they were also the
developers of Word, and wanted it to have a monopoly.

I'm not saying they did any of this, I have no personal experience with
the Ctrl+J key combination, nor have I any insights into exactly how
they did this if it actually is true. I just know that they have done
evil and rude things to get or maintain a monopoly in the past, more
than once, including something very, very similar, and I wouldn't put
it past them to have done this too. I'm merely suggesting ways in which
they could have done it. I'm sure there are more.

Some  of the things Microsoft has done are chronicled here in a report 
to the European Commission a number of years ago:

http://www.ecis.eu/documents/Finalversion_Consumerchoicepaper.pdf

Don



--


**


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-05 Thread Ken Springer

On 11/5/13 5:44 PM, Urmas wrote:

"Paul":


Microsoft, as the developers of the
OS, put code in their OS to capture the Ctrl+J key combination, and not
pass it on to the foreground application. However, they also put in
code to allow an application to request that the key combination be
passed on, code that most people, including the developers of WordStar,



Or, alternatively, Microsoft, as the developers of the OS, put code in
to detect a running copy of WordStar, and hide the Ctrl+J key
combination from it.



I'm not saying they did any of this,


So you've just made that malarkey up? Wow.


It may be true for Wordstar, and it may not be.  MS lost a lot of court 
cases because of actions like this.  Geoworks is one case I know of. 
Geoworks won the battle in court, but the war was over.


So, I never trust companies that I know have broken various policies, as 
Facebook and Google have done.



--
Ken

Mac OS X 10.8.5
Firefox 24.0
Thunderbird 17.0.8
LibreOffice 4.1.2.3


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-05 Thread Urmas

"Paul":


Microsoft, as the developers of the
OS, put code in their OS to capture the Ctrl+J key combination, and not
pass it on to the foreground application. However, they also put in
code to allow an application to request that the key combination be
passed on, code that most people, including the developers of WordStar,



Or, alternatively, Microsoft, as the developers of the OS, put code in
to detect a running copy of WordStar, and hide the Ctrl+J key
combination from it.



I'm not saying they did any of this,


So you've just made that malarkey up? Wow.


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-05 Thread Paul
On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 05:34:38 +0700
"Urmas"  wrote:

> > Simple. The evil machinations of Microsoft.
> 
> I will repeat. If any and all Windows application could use Ctrl+J
> for anything, why WordStad suddenly couldn't? 

Ok, let me spell it out for you. Microsoft, as the developers of the
OS, put code in their OS to capture the Ctrl+J key combination, and not
pass it on to the foreground application. However, they also put in
code to allow an application to request that the key combination be
passed on, code that most people, including the developers of WordStar,
didn't know about (at least until after it was too late). Then
Microsoft, as developers of Word, put in the necessary request to make
the OS pass on the Ctrl+J key combination to Word. They knew to do
this, because they were the same company.

Or, alternatively, Microsoft, as the developers of the OS, put code in
to detect a running copy of WordStar, and hide the Ctrl+J key
combination from it. They did this because they were also the
developers of Word, and wanted it to have a monopoly.

I'm not saying they did any of this, I have no personal experience with
the Ctrl+J key combination, nor have I any insights into exactly how
they did this if it actually is true. I just know that they have done
evil and rude things to get or maintain a monopoly in the past, more
than once, including something very, very similar, and I wouldn't put
it past them to have done this too. I'm merely suggesting ways in which
they could have done it. I'm sure there are more.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-05 Thread Urmas

Simple. The evil machinations of Microsoft.


I will repeat. If any and all Windows application could use Ctrl+J for 
anything, why WordStad suddenly couldn't? 




--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-05 Thread Paul
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:50:25 +0700
"Urmas"  wrote:

> "Virgil Arrington":
> 
> Actually, WordStar had different Ctrl+key functions than Word. Yes,
> today, Ctrl+J is a shortcut for Justify, but back in the WordStar
> days, Ctrl+J did something different...
> 
> If it worked in Microsoft Word, how the hell it was 'captured' and 
> 'unavailable' for Wordstar, whatever function it had?

Simple. The evil machinations of Microsoft.

They've done similar many times. Like making Windows 3.1 report false
errors on versions of DOS other than MS DOS.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AARD_code

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Re: Wordstar

2013-11-04 Thread Urmas

"Virgil Arrington":

Actually, WordStar had different Ctrl+key functions than Word. Yes, today, 
Ctrl+J is a shortcut for Justify, but back in the WordStar days, Ctrl+J did 
something different...


If it worked in Microsoft Word, how the hell it was 'captured' and 
'unavailable' for Wordstar, whatever function it had?




--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted