Thanks Paul.
Glad I could help figure this out.
Good luck with the bug then.
Cheers,
Le mar. 11 oct. 2016 à 13:54, Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> a écrit :
> This is a bug in Groovy. Normally for a property those modifier bits
> are cleared:
>
> https://github.com/apache/groovy/blob/master/src/main/org/codehaus/groovy/classgen/Verifier.java#L641-L647
>
> But for @Bindable it creates its own setters and bypass the above logic:
>
> https://github.com/apache/groovy/blob/master/src/main/groovy/beans/BindableASTTransformation.java#L247-L258
>
> The same will be true for @Vetoable:
>
> https://github.com/apache/groovy/blob/master/src/main/groovy/beans/VetoableASTTransformation.java#L311-L323
>
> I created the following issue to track the problem:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7969
>
> Cheers, Paul.
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Nicolas Peru
> <nicolas.p...@sonarsource.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am the developer of the SonarQube Java Analyzer.
> > While we are doing an analysis we are reading bytecode of external
> > dependencies of the compilation unit analyzed.
> >
> > A user recently came back on SonarQube google group complaining about a
> > failure on one of the invariant we have in our bytecode analysis where a
> > bridge method was not marked as synthetic.
> >
> > Investigating a bit further it appears that the failing method is a
> getter
> > generated by groovy compiler and that it is indeed (wrongly) marked as
> > bridge because it is the same bit as the one used for volatile for
> fields.
> >
> > This is an issue that is supposed to be solved a long time ago per :
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-3726
> >
> > A reproducer of this issue can be found by compiling the following
> project :
> > https://github.com/Petikoch/sonarqube_issue and looking at the generated
> > .class files.
> >
> > Related discussion about this specific problem on SonarQube Google
> groups:
> >
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_medium=email_source=footer#!msg/sonarqube/htmOuRPm4-c/AVMlDxvOCgAJ
> >
> > as I am no Groovy expert, can anyone shed a light on this ? It sounds to
> me
> > like there is still a bug on Groovy side on this but I might be wrong.
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nicolas PERU | SonarSource
> > Senior Developer
> > http://sonarsource.com
> > https://twitter.com/benzonico
>
--
*Nicolas PERU | SonarSource*
*Senior Developer*
http://sonarsource.com
https://twitter.com/benzonico
