RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Totally stumped on httpd, gcc & solaris 10
> -Original Message- > From: Ricardo Stella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 9:47 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Totally stumped on httpd, gcc & solaris 10 > > > > Chris Edwards wrote: > > Hola! > > > > I am trying to compile Apache2 on Solaris 10 with gcc. Here is the > > error Im getting durring the make... > > I'm using gcc 3.3.2 from sunfreeware.com... This, I think, might be the critical thing... I too have 3.3.2 on solaris 10 and no problems. Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. > > My .02... > > -- > > °(((=((===°°°(((=== > > Diese E-mail ist eine private und persönliche Kommunikation. Sie hat keinen Bezug zur Börsen- bzw. Geschäftstätigkeit der SWX Gruppe. This e-mail is of a private and personal nature. It is not related to the exchange or business activities of the SWX Group. Le présent e-mail est un message privé et personnel, sans rapport avec l'activité boursière du Groupe SWX. This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Proxying active ftp
proxying ftp itself as is a difficult proposition. even when you set
your clients to passive ftp, i dont think its the ftp thats being
actually proxied. the ftp request is being converted into a http
request and sent to the proxy server. the proxy server performs the
actual ftp transaction and returns a http response. the reason is that
there was no ftp proxy protocol developed stated or adhered to.
proxying ftp as is has to be done by intercepting and inspecting the
traffic and rewriting the packets.
now mod_proxy_ftp is not a packet inspector/rewriter.
like i said before the only reason your clients seem to work in passive
mode is that they must be converting the ftp request into a http
request to the proxy server. in active mode + http proxy i really dont
know what the client is supposed to do or what the proxy is supposed to
do. there has never been and probably never will be any clear guideline
on this this.
if you really want to proxy active ftp connections you might consider
using a socks proxy server, though in my experience i have never come
across a client that fully supported active ftp over a socks proxy.
you should actually look at the actual network traffic of the ftp and
http protocols - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP ,
http://www.jmarshall.com/easy/http/ , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ftp
and http://slacksite.com/other/ftp.html
Browne, Anthony A wrote:
Thanks, I now have a better understanding about how the proxy
module handles ftp.
also your configuration seems a bit weird. you are running apache on
port 21
Yes, my configuration is pretty weird. I'm running Apache on
three ports, but clients use 9982 as their ftp proxy. The clients on the
LAN use the Apache ftp proxy as a forward proxy for connections to ftp
servers elsewhere. In other words, I need to forward all ftp requests.
So, now I'm wondering why the proxy_ftp module is having trouble
with this. Shouldn't it proxy active ftp?
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:44 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Proxying active ftp
yes ftp cannot be proxied easily. once a control connection is
established (that is on port 21), information is exchanged as to which
ports will be used to transfer the data. the mod_proxy/mod_proxy_ftp
modules respond in http format to ftp requests. that is they process the
ftp request internally on their own using the ftp protocol but the
response is always http. so ftp will not work.
what is happening in your case is that your ftp clients are making a
http request for a ftp resource via a http proxy server. thats why it
works. i am not sure why your client tries to use a proxy when it is
asked to do active ftp.
also your configuration seems a bit weird. you are running apache on
port 21. running it on port 21 dosent make it an ftp server. i am
drawing these conclusions from the following line -
The proxy server could not handle the request GET
ftp:///products//x/.exe
if i am guessing right you must be setting proxy to :9982 in your
ftp client. its a wonder that it works when u disable active ftp.
cheers,
emmanuel
Browne, Anthony A wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have a virtual host that needs to proxy ftp. The config for it
is:
ServerAdmin
ServerName :9982
LogFormat "%t %h %{Host}i \"%r\" %s %B" ftpcommon
CustomLog logs/9982_access.log ftpcommon
ProxyRequests On
The problem is that when clients try active ftp connections, they get:
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
The proxy server could not handle the request GET
ftp:///products//x/.exe
Reason: connect to :62715 failed - firewall/NAT?
Apache/2.0.54 (Win32) Server at Port 21
I assume that its active ftp that's causing the problem because of the
port numbers, but in any event I don't know what to do next. I've
tried a bunch of things and none of them have worked. Anyone, have any
suggestions?
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server
Project.
See for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server
Project.
See for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server
Project.
See for more info.
To un
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Large files
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:58:15AM -0400, Mike VanHorn wrote: > > I have compiled and built 2.0.58, but I am still getting the same error: > > (79)Value too large for defined data type > > I'd been checking and LFS was supposedly fixed in 2.0.53, so why am I > getting this error? I'm on Solaris 10 x86. The unnecessarily obscure "more up to date" reference means 2.2.x - see http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/new_features_2_2.html - 2.2.x releases have large file support out of the box. No 2.0.x release has large file support on 32-bit platforms (there are some hacks you can use, but this is not recommended or supported). Regards, joe - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: mod_proxy_balancer stickysession issues
Brian Rectanus wrote: Hello all, I am having problems with mod_proxy_balancer and sticky sessions in 2.2.0 - 2.2.2. Here is what I have: NameVirtualHost *:80 Listen 80 ... BalancerMember http://server1:8000 route=server1 BalancerMember http://server2:8000 route=server2 ProxyPass / balancer://apps/ stickysession=MYCOOKIE nofailover=On This *should* balance all requests to either server1 or server2 and append a '.server[12]' to the MYCOOKIE value. Then, on the next request MYCOOKIE value would be something like '1234567.server1', and the route set to server1. Is this correct? However, the route is not being appended to the cookie value, so the sessions are not sticky. 1) Client requests main page 2) Server sends main page w/Set-Cookie MYCOOKIE=1234567 3) Client makes sub-requests w/Cookie MYCOOKIE=1234567 4) Server balances as if no sticky sessions (no route found) Should 2) above be: 2) Server sends main page w/MYCOOKIE=1234567.server1 as I expect? I forgot to mention in the original post: If I modify the cookie value on the client so that it *does* append the '.server1', then all is fine and it works the way I expect. The server is just not doing that as I expect it to. Also, I have tried using this: ProxyPass /path/ balancer://apps/path/ stickysession=MYCOOKIE nofailover=On as well as: ProxySet balancer://apps stickysession=MYCOOKIE nofailover=On RewriteRule ^/(.*) balancer://apps/$1 [P,L] All had the same failed result. Thanks, -B - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Totally stumped on httpd, gcc & solaris 10
Chris Edwards wrote: > Hola! > > I am trying to compile Apache2 on Solaris 10 with gcc. Here is the > error Im getting durring the make... > > exports.c:116:2: #endif without #if > make[2]: *** [exports.lo] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory > `/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/server' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory > `/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/server' > make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > # > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! > > Well, although 2.2.2 is out, it would help to know what options you used for configure or what gcc you are using. Here's mine, ripped from the net somewhere and since I need ldap and BerkeleyDB, those options are there (note LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS should all be on one line): CFLAGS="-O2"; export CFLAGS LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/ssl/lib -L/usr/local/openldap/lib -L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/ssl/lib:/usr/local/openldap/lib:/usr/local/lib"; export LDFLAGS CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/local/ssl/include -I/usr/local/openldap/include -I/usr/local/include"; export CPPFLAGS ./configure \ --prefix=/usr/local/apache2 \ --enable-mods-shared=most \ --with-ldap-include=/usr/local/openldap/include \ --with-ldap-lib=/usr/local/openldap/lib \ --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl \ --with-perl=/usr/local/bin/perl \ --with-ldap \ --with-berkeley-db=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB \ --enable-ldap \ --enable-authnz-ldap \ --enable-ssl I'm using gcc 3.3.2 from sunfreeware.com... My .02... -- °(((=((===°°°(((=== begin:vcard fn:Ricardo Stella n:Stella;Ricardo org:Rider University adr;dom:;;2083 Lawrenceville Rd;Lawrenceville;NJ;08648 version:2.1 end:vcard - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_auth_radius
I'm using mod_auth_radius with Apache 2.2.2 to protect a directory. Here's the entries from the log file: [Thu May 11 15:32:43 2006] [debug] mod_auth_radius-2.0.c(1154): Radius Auth for: servername requests /path-to-protected-directory/ : file=/full-path-to-protected-directory/ [Thu May 11 15:32:43 2006] [debug] mod_auth_radius-2.0.c(1185): No cookie found. Trying RADIUS authentication.\n [Thu May 11 15:32:43 2006] [debug] mod_auth_radius-2.0.c(894): Sending packet on radius-server [Thu May 11 15:32:43 2006] [debug] mod_auth_radius-2.0.c(1223): RADIUS Authentication for user=my-user-name password=my-password OK. Cookie expiry in 60 minutes\n [Thu May 11 15:32:43 2006] [debug] mod_auth_radius-2.0.c(1225): Adding cookie bad0609dc93dcae84e4316263abb792a44639f6b\n [Thu May 11 15:32:43 2006] [crit] [client my-ip-address] configuration error: couldn't check access. No groups file?: /path-to-protected-directory/ Looking at the "[debug]" messages above, it looks like the radius authentication worked fine, and my username was authenticated, and it told apache to server the page. However, from the "[crit]" message, apache thinks that mod_auth_radius didn't work right. Other things on the server, protected with "regular" password files, work fine, and if you enter the wrong username and password on those, you get my custom error page for a 401 error. With the mod_auth_radius protected directory, it just returns a 500 (server error). From that, I assume that apache is NOT thinking mod_auth_radius said "no, the person is not authorized"; if it had done that, it would have returned the 401 page. Instead, it seems to be that when mod_auth_radius is finished, apache fails in some other way. A huge thanks, and maybe some beer*, if anyone can give me a clue to what's going on. Thanks! * The University probably won't let me buy anyone beer; but the huge thanks is guaranteed. --- Mike VanHorn Senior Computer Systems Administrator College of Engineering and Computer Science Wright State University 265 Russ Engineering Center 937-775-5157 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cs.wright.edu/~mvanhorn/ - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] https to http proxy with Apache
Hello, I have a problem I've been grappling with for the past 3 days
without much luck so I thought I'd come to the experts. :-) I have
an Apache 2.0.x server, which acts as a load balancing gateway to
multiple Tomcat servlet containers behind it. This proxying/load
balancing is done using the combination of mod_rewrite and mod_proxy.
It has been working very well for traffic over normal HTTP. I now need
to make this work over HTTPS between the browsers and the Apache, and
that's where I'm having the problem. I configured the Apache server to
listen for HTTPS requests, and they forward correctly over regular HTTP
to the Tomcats behind it, however whenever there is an incoming POST
from a form in the web application, the response from the Tomcat causes
a switch to HTTP, where I need it to remain HTTPS. Here's what the
pertinent portion of the configuration looks like:
RewriteMap tomcats "rnd:/path/to/tomcat-workers.conf"
ProxyPreserveHost On
ProxyTimeout 8000
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond "%{HTTP_COOKIE}" "(^};\s*)jsessionid=\w*\.(\w+)($|;)" [NC]
RewriteRule "(.*)""http://$(tomcats:%2)%{REQUEST_URI}" [P,L,NC]
RewriteRule "^.*;jsessionid=\w*\.(\w+)($|;)"
"http://$(tomcats:$1)%{REQUEST_URI}" [P,L,NC]
RewriteRule "(.*)""http://$(tomcats:all)%{REQUEST_URI}" [P,L,NC]
ProxyPassRevese http://andy:8012/
ProxyPassRevese http://andy:8022/
ProxyPassRevese http://andy:8032/
ProxyPassRevese http://andy:8042/
I suspect that the problem lies somewhere in the ProxyPassReverse, but
don't know what I could to remedy it. Any suggestions would be welcome.
Thanks,
Bo
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Totally stumped on httpd, gcc & solaris 10
Hola! I am trying to compile Apache2 on Solaris 10 with gcc. Here is the error Im getting durring the make... make[4]: Leaving directory `/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/server/mpm/prefork' make[3]: Leaving directory `/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/server/mpm/prefork' make[2]: Leaving directory `/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/server/mpm' make[2]: Entering directory `/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/server' /export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc -g -O2-DSOLARIS2=10 -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -D_REENTRANT -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -I/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/srclib/pcre -I. -I/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/os/unix -I/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/server/mpm/prefork -I/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/modules/http -I/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/modules/filters -I/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/modules/proxy -I/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/include -I/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/modules/generators -I/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/modules/mappers -I/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/modules/database -I/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/srclib/apr/include -I/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/srclib/apr-util/include -I/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/lib -I/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/modules/proxy/../generators -I/usr/local/ssl/include -I/usr/sfw/include -I/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/modules/ssl -I/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/modules/dav/main -prefer-non-pic -static -c exports.c && touch exports.lo exports.c:116:2: #endif without #if make[2]: *** [exports.lo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/server' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/export/home/chris/Sources/httpd-2.2.0/server' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 # Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! --- Chris Edwards Chief Technology Officer "Buy The Truck" Phone: 706.638.5977 x222 Fax: 706.638.0595 Web: http://www.buythetruck.com Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] P.O. Box 468 1115 S. Chattanooga St. Lafayette, GA 30728 - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] verifying and installing apache 2.0.5.8 in AIX/unix environment
How exactly do you verify the apache download? _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy_balancer stickysession issues
Hello all, I am having problems with mod_proxy_balancer and sticky sessions in 2.2.0 - 2.2.2. Here is what I have: NameVirtualHost *:80 Listen 80 ... BalancerMember http://server1:8000 route=server1 BalancerMember http://server2:8000 route=server2 ProxyPass / balancer://apps/ stickysession=MYCOOKIE nofailover=On This *should* balance all requests to either server1 or server2 and append a '.server[12]' to the MYCOOKIE value. Then, on the next request MYCOOKIE value would be something like '1234567.server1', and the route set to server1. Is this correct? However, the route is not being appended to the cookie value, so the sessions are not sticky. 1) Client requests main page 2) Server sends main page w/Set-Cookie MYCOOKIE=1234567 3) Client makes sub-requests w/Cookie MYCOOKIE=1234567 4) Server balances as if no sticky sessions (no route found) Should 2) above be: 2) Server sends main page w/MYCOOKIE=1234567.server1 as I expect? Also, some other concerns: 1) The separator between sessionid and route is not overridable a) '.' seems to be common in sessionids b) '.' is used by mod_usertrack and makes it incompatible Could something be added to store the route data in another field or be able to specify the field separator? Maybe routename=cookie:MYROUTE Or, perhaps proxy_balancer should be looking for the *last* '.' instead of the first one? 2) The documentation states you can use RewriteRule w/ [P], but ProxySet is not documented w/o browsing the code. a) ProxySet balancer://apps stickysession=foo nofailover=On works but, again, is not documented b) ProxySet stickysession=foo nofailover=On works within on 2.2.2, but only if after BalancerMember and is also not documented. 3) Seemingly no way to know where the response came from on the reverse proxy server. It would be nice to have an ENV var set or a header added to response with the value of the backend route or balancer name. Thanks, -B - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2.2.2 - appropriate APR libraries
Forget my previous comments, I was having flashbacks to 0.9 apr. >> that Apache 2.2 uses the APR 1.0 API - so will the current releases: >> APR 1.2.7 (APR 1.2.7, APR-util 1.2.7 and APR iconv 1.1.1) build >> correctly with this release? Or should I be locating these libraries Yes. They also happen to be bundled in 2.2.2 httpd sources, so you really shouldn't have to go out and grab them seperately. They will build in-tree when you do a win32 httpd binary build. apr-iconv remains at 1.1.1 for the moment, also bundled in the -win32-src.zip package of httpd-2.2.2 Yours, Bill William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to source the appropriate APR libraries for the binary build of the Apache 2.2.2 installation... http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/new_features_2_2.html#module indicates that Apache 2.2 uses the APR 1.0 API - so will the current releases: APR 1.2.7 (APR 1.2.7, APR-util 1.2.7 and APR iconv 1.1.1) build correctly with this release? Or should I be locating these libraries either in the Apache install (on the windows machine) or from somewhere else? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] . - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] . - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2.2.2 - appropriate APR libraries
It shouldn't be saying 1.2.7 - the 1.2.12 releases are out. Our bad. Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to source the appropriate APR libraries for the binary build of the Apache 2.2.2 installation... http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/new_features_2_2.html#module indicates that Apache 2.2 uses the APR 1.0 API - so will the current releases: APR 1.2.7 (APR 1.2.7, APR-util 1.2.7 and APR iconv 1.1.1) build correctly with this release? Or should I be locating these libraries either in the Apache install (on the windows machine) or from somewhere else? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] . - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[cli-users] RE: cli-users Digest 11 May 2006 16:15:42 -0000 Issue 81
Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 12:16 PM To: cli-users@httpd.apache.org Subject: cli-users Digest 11 May 2006 16:15:42 - Issue 81 cli-users Digest 11 May 2006 16:15:42 - Issue 81 Topics (messages 175 through 175): Announcement; cli-users@ List Folding into dev@ on May 15 175 by: William A. Rowe, Jr. Administrivia: To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To post to the list, e-mail: cli-users@httpd.apache.org -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[cli-users] Announcement; cli-users@ List Folding into dev@ on May 15
CLI-USERS@ community, this note is to let you know about some major changes coming up here over the next week. Effective on Monday, May 15th, cli-users@ traffic will all move into the general community of users@httpd.apache.org, with this list closing. You can email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to join that list ahead of time. This is part of a general effort to move mod_aspdotnet into the regular fold of httpd development and user peer-to-peer support. The [EMAIL PROTECTED] list similarly folds into [EMAIL PROTECTED] The mod_aspdotnet moves from cli into the top-level httpd project. Based on participation and oversight from the .NET community on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] community, the httpd project will continue to support the module. If there is an overall lack of participation, the module may be shelved sometime in the future for want of support. It's entirely up to the community to ensure it's long term success. We are doing so to ensure several things, better integration with the httpd development process, better oversight by the httpd project, and to keep the general development community aware of happenings in .NET space to their project. This provides a more open window to you - the cli-users community, to learn about other aspects of Apache httpd by participating in the wider [EMAIL PROTECTED] community process. In closing, a new release will be submitted monday for consideration based on the most recent snapshot (which many already use). Once it's done, this will be branched to a vs2002 specific branch, and the main code upgraded for the new C++ API in Visual Studio 2005. This should permit more users to roll-their-own based on the Visual Studio 2005 express edition, and catches up to Microsoft's current C++.NET programming language (which as some already know, looks little like the original iteration of C++.NET). We hope to see a strong showing in the release vote process, because the release process is the one and only metric of project health; it will determine if mod_aspdotnet continues to survive as an effort of the ASF and the Apache HTTP Project. We look forward to seeing you on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and answering your questions there. As always, general ASP.NET programming questions already have better forums out there, but whenever you find discrepancies between hosting ASP.NET pages under mod_aspdotnet v.s. mod_mono or IIS, users@httpd.apache.org will become the place to ask about them! Yours, Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Large files
I have compiled and built 2.0.58, but I am still getting the same error: (79)Value too large for defined data type I'd been checking and LFS was supposedly fixed in 2.0.53, so why am I getting this error? I'm on Solaris 10 x86. Thanks! On 5/10/06 12:38 PM, "Nick Kew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 10 May 2006 16:10, Mike VanHorn wrote: >> I've found on the web where Apache doesn't support the serving of files >>> 2GB on 32-bit systems > > More up to date versions of apache have large file support enabled by default. --- Mike VanHorn Senior Computer Systems Administrator College of Engineering and Computer Science Wright State University 265 Russ Engineering Center 937-775-5157 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cs.wright.edu/~mvanhorn/ - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to determine build flags
Ah...well, I did a custom configuration anyway with Apache 2.2, PHP 5, MySQL 5 and have things setup in non-standard locales anyway to take advantage of our RAID setup and to integrate into a Win32 environment. Thanks for the info! -Original Message- From: Alexey Polyakov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:18 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to determine build flags On 5/11/06, Billy Nab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately, in some OEM installs the config.nice does not exist. At > least I could not find it on a recent OEM install of RHEL/4. For RHEL4 you can just install SRPM, and check spec file to determine build configuration. -- Alexey Polyakov - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to determine build flags
On 5/11/06, Billy Nab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Unfortunately, in some OEM installs the config.nice does not exist. At least I could not find it on a recent OEM install of RHEL/4. For RHEL4 you can just install SRPM, and check spec file to determine build configuration. -- Alexey Polyakov - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Proxying active ftp
Thanks, I now have a better understanding about how the proxy
module handles ftp.
> also your configuration seems a bit weird. you are running apache on
> port 21
Yes, my configuration is pretty weird. I'm running Apache on
three ports, but clients use 9982 as their ftp proxy. The clients on the
LAN use the Apache ftp proxy as a forward proxy for connections to ftp
servers elsewhere. In other words, I need to forward all ftp requests.
So, now I'm wondering why the proxy_ftp module is having trouble
with this. Shouldn't it proxy active ftp?
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:44 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Proxying active ftp
yes ftp cannot be proxied easily. once a control connection is
established (that is on port 21), information is exchanged as to which
ports will be used to transfer the data. the mod_proxy/mod_proxy_ftp
modules respond in http format to ftp requests. that is they process the
ftp request internally on their own using the ftp protocol but the
response is always http. so ftp will not work.
what is happening in your case is that your ftp clients are making a
http request for a ftp resource via a http proxy server. thats why it
works. i am not sure why your client tries to use a proxy when it is
asked to do active ftp.
also your configuration seems a bit weird. you are running apache on
port 21. running it on port 21 dosent make it an ftp server. i am
drawing these conclusions from the following line -
The proxy server could not handle the request GET
ftp:///products//x/.exe
if i am guessing right you must be setting proxy to :9982 in your
ftp client. its a wonder that it works when u disable active ftp.
cheers,
emmanuel
Browne, Anthony A wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a virtual host that needs to proxy ftp. The config for it
> is:
>
>
> ServerAdmin
> ServerName :9982
> LogFormat "%t %h %{Host}i \"%r\" %s %B" ftpcommon
> CustomLog logs/9982_access.log ftpcommon
> ProxyRequests On
>
>
> The problem is that when clients try active ftp connections, they get:
>
> The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
> The proxy server could not handle the request GET
> ftp:///products//x/.exe
>
> Reason: connect to :62715 failed - firewall/NAT?
>
> Apache/2.0.54 (Win32) Server at Port 21
>
> I assume that its active ftp that's causing the problem because of the
> port numbers, but in any event I don't know what to do next. I've
> tried a bunch of things and none of them have worked. Anyone, have any
> suggestions?
>
>
> -
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server
Project.
> See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server
Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server
Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to determine build flags
I found it (I'm on Solaris 10 x86, config.nice was in /var/apache2/build). Unfortunately, the configure command there didn't quite work, and I'm having to explicitly declare --bindir and --libdir. But, it's closer than I was. Thanks! On 5/11/06 9:53 AM, "Billy Nab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately, in some OEM installs the config.nice does not exist. At > least I could not find it on a recent OEM install of RHEL/4. > > Bill > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua > Slive > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 7:34 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to determine build flags > > On 5/11/06, Mike VanHorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Is there a way to determine what build flags were used to produce an > httpd >> binary, when all you have is the binary? I'm trying to upgrade the >> oem-installed Apache, and I would like to be able to just drop the new > one >> in, so it would be helpful to know all the flags so it gets build > exactly >> the same way. > > What you need to find is the file "config.nice". On a standard apache > install, this is placed in the build/ directory under the ServerRoot. > Where it is on your system is anyones guess. > > httpd -V > gives you some info, but certainly not everyting. > > Joshua. > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server > Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- Mike VanHorn Senior Computer Systems Administrator College of Engineering and Computer Science Wright State University 265 Russ Engineering Center 937-775-5157 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cs.wright.edu/~mvanhorn/ - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to determine build flags
Unfortunately, in some OEM installs the config.nice does not exist. At least I could not find it on a recent OEM install of RHEL/4. Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 7:34 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to determine build flags On 5/11/06, Mike VanHorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there a way to determine what build flags were used to produce an httpd > binary, when all you have is the binary? I'm trying to upgrade the > oem-installed Apache, and I would like to be able to just drop the new one > in, so it would be helpful to know all the flags so it gets build exactly > the same way. What you need to find is the file "config.nice". On a standard apache install, this is placed in the build/ directory under the ServerRoot. Where it is on your system is anyones guess. httpd -V gives you some info, but certainly not everyting. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help configuring server with fastcgi module
While trying to configure Apache2.2.2 on my Windows XP by adding the mod_fastcgi-2.4.2-AP20.dll in the httpd.conf file, I am not able to start the server. The console window indicates a problem and shows a series of numbers which I am unable to figure out. Without this module in the httpd.conf the server starts fine.If any one noticed this I would appreciate hearing from them. I needed to add this module for installing PHP. Thanks Raj Kairam
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to determine build flags
On 5/11/06, Mike VanHorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there a way to determine what build flags were used to produce an httpd binary, when all you have is the binary? I'm trying to upgrade the oem-installed Apache, and I would like to be able to just drop the new one in, so it would be helpful to know all the flags so it gets build exactly the same way. What you need to find is the file "config.nice". On a standard apache install, this is placed in the build/ directory under the ServerRoot. Where it is on your system is anyones guess. httpd -V gives you some info, but certainly not everyting. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] How to determine build flags
Is there a way to determine what build flags were used to produce an httpd binary, when all you have is the binary? I'm trying to upgrade the oem-installed Apache, and I would like to be able to just drop the new one in, so it would be helpful to know all the flags so it gets build exactly the same way. --- Mike VanHorn Senior Computer Systems Administrator College of Engineering and Computer Science Wright State University 265 Russ Engineering Center 937-775-5157 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cs.wright.edu/~mvanhorn/ - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] virtual host limit
On 5/11/06, Norbul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I found in logs something like this [Wed May 10 23:10:44 2006] [crit] [client 83.31.216.31] (24)Too many open files: /.htaccess pcfg_openfile: unable to check htaccess file, ensure it is readable, referer: http://e-walentynki.pl/znaczenie_imion.php [Wed May 10 23:10:46 2006] [crit] [client 80.226.219.162] (24)Too many open files: /.htaccess pcfg_openfile: unable to check htaccess file, ensure it is readable [Wed May 10 23:10:46 2006] [crit] [client ::1] (24)Too many open files: /.htaccess pcfg_openfile: unable to check htaccess file, ensure it is readable See: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/fd-limits.html Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] virtual host limit
I found in logs something like this [Wed May 10 23:10:44 2006] [crit] [client 83.31.216.31] (24)Too many open files: /.htaccess pcfg_openfile: unable to check htaccess file, ensure it is readable, referer: http://e-walentynki.pl/znaczenie_imion.php [Wed May 10 23:10:46 2006] [crit] [client 80.226.219.162] (24)Too many open files: /.htaccess pcfg_openfile: unable to check htaccess file, ensure it is readable [Wed May 10 23:10:46 2006] [crit] [client ::1] (24)Too many open files: /.htaccess pcfg_openfile: unable to check htaccess file, ensure it is readable - Original Message - From: "Boyle Owen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 2:37 PM Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] virtual host limit > -Original Message- > From: Norbul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 2:27 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] virtual host limit > > Dears, > > I have problem with increase of number of virtual host on > apache 2 server, when adding another one, I get form virtual > forbidden error Please post the the *exact* error message (cut'n'paste - don't paraphrase)... Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. > > Does onybody know how to solve this problem?? > > thx, > norbul > Diese E-mail ist eine private und persönliche Kommunikation. Sie hat keinen Bezug zur Börsen- bzw. Geschäftstätigkeit der SWX Gruppe. This e-mail is of a private and personal nature. It is not related to the exchange or business activities of the SWX Group. Le présent e-mail est un message privé et personnel, sans rapport avec l'activité boursière du Groupe SWX. This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] virtual host limit
Maybe I didn't write correctly, I have about 300 virtual hosts on Apache 2 server, and everything works great, without any problems etc. but when I adding another one Virtual Host (nr 301), then server fail, no one virtul host can be accessible, and then I get http 403 error, but this information is not loged in log files, Mayby somthing wrong is in resorce limit?? - Original Message - From: "Boyle Owen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 2:37 PM Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] virtual host limit > -Original Message- > From: Norbul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 2:27 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] virtual host limit > > Dears, > > I have problem with increase of number of virtual host on > apache 2 server, when adding another one, I get form virtual > forbidden error Please post the the *exact* error message (cut'n'paste - don't paraphrase)... Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. > > Does onybody know how to solve this problem?? > > thx, > norbul > Diese E-mail ist eine private und persönliche Kommunikation. Sie hat keinen Bezug zur Börsen- bzw. Geschäftstätigkeit der SWX Gruppe. This e-mail is of a private and personal nature. It is not related to the exchange or business activities of the SWX Group. Le présent e-mail est un message privé et personnel, sans rapport avec l'activité boursière du Groupe SWX. This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] virtual host limit
> -Original Message- > From: Norbul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 2:27 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] virtual host limit > > Dears, > > I have problem with increase of number of virtual host on > apache 2 server, when adding another one, I get form virtual > forbidden error Please post the the *exact* error message (cut'n'paste - don't paraphrase)... Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. > > Does onybody know how to solve this problem?? > > thx, > norbul > Diese E-mail ist eine private und persönliche Kommunikation. Sie hat keinen Bezug zur Börsen- bzw. Geschäftstätigkeit der SWX Gruppe. This e-mail is of a private and personal nature. It is not related to the exchange or business activities of the SWX Group. Le présent e-mail est un message privé et personnel, sans rapport avec l'activité boursière du Groupe SWX. This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virtual host limit
Dears, I have problem with increase of number of virtual host on apache 2 server, when adding another one, I get form virtual forbidden error Does onybody know how to solve this problem?? thx, norbul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Proxy errors
Hi, I'm seeing the following in my apache error log: proxy: Error reading from remote server But I'm having trouble tying it up to a request in the access log and also having problem diagnosing the exact fault. Can I therefore ask a few questions? 1. We use mod_proxy as part of a whole pile of URL rewriting we do. I *think* the proxy is timing out during the rewriting process, possibly because Apache gets busy. We also limit the bandwidth on this site so that might be causing the timeout. Does this seem a reasonable explanation? Or does anyone else have any other ideas? 2. Another possibility is that a lot of our pages make http requests to external services behind the scenes, before returning to the user. If these external services fail to respond, this may also cause the proxy timeout. Comments? 3. I have ProxyErrorOverride turned on, but does this error have an associated HTTP 1.1 status code that I can trap and then give a better error? I don't see anything in the access logs, but that might be because its trapped inside mod_rewrite. 4. When this error occurs, it doesn't seem to be either or after the request is made. My understanding is that this error occurs because the proxy times out, but which timeout value is it supposed to use? Thanks in advance for any help you can give. cheers Matt -- Matthew Claridge Product Support Engineer RWA Limited Tel: 02920 815 054 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.rwa-net.co.uk - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] instaling modules
>> > did you run your ./configure with >> > "--enable-mods-shared=all" ? > $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache2 --enable-so > --enable-mods-share=all Compare your configure line to what was suggested. Joost - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
