[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite & mod_proxy & %2F in URL
Hello. We used Apache 2.0.54 as a reverse proxy for an internet webmail access with the following rewrite rule: AllowEncodedSlashes On RewriteEngine on RewriteRule /(.*)/MessagePart/(.*)/(.*)/(.*)-H.txt http://127.0.0.1:8100/$1/MessagePart/$2\%2F$3/$4-H.txt [P] It is essential for the mailserver to get the %2F character instead of an /. Otherwise the request results in an "404 not found error". The ruleset worked well until we upgraded to 2.0.58. Suddenly the rewrite produced another URL string. What before was an %2F now results in an %252F. We could track down that problem to the following patch that came with version 2.0.55: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=227435 Obviously the old (but for us correct) url translation worked in three steps: step 1: mod_rewrite: .../... -> ...%2F... step 2: mod_proxy: ...%2F... -> ...%252F... step 3: mod_proxy: ...%252F... -> ...%2F... With the patch step 3 is now obsolete and we have no possibility to encode an / character into an %2F because mod_proxy will always replace any % charachter it finds with the %25 chars. Has anyone an idea of how to come around this problem. The only solution we found was to disable the patch and to force the behaviour as it was before. Best regards. Markus Stockhausen - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pease help with mod_deflate configuration
Hi, Did you mean this : ## Options FollowSymLinks AllowOverride None # Insert filter # HTTP COMPRESSION SetOutputFilter DEFLATE # Netscape 4.x has some problems... BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4 gzip-only-text/html # Netscape 4.06-4.08 have some more problems BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4\.0[678] no-gzip # MSIE masquerades as Netscape, but it is fine # BrowserMatch \bMSIE !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html # NOTE: Due to a bug in mod_setenvif up to Apache 2.0.48 # the above regex won't work. You can use the following # workaround to get the desired effect: BrowserMatch \bMSI[E] !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html # Don't compress images SetEnvIfNoCase Request_URI \ \.(?:gif|jpe?g|png)$ no-gzip dont-vary # Make sure proxies don't deliver the wrong content #Header append Vary User-Agent env=!dont-vary # This would give error message " And I tried to comment the , no error message given. Anyway this doesn't work. - Original Message - From: Emmanuel E To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:14 PM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pease help with mod_deflate configuration no no what i meant was put it in the section which says . there should already be a section.CC CHEN wrote: Hi, It doesn't work at all if i replace with - Original Message - From: Emmanuel E To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 6:58 PM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pease help with mod_deflate configuration try putting it in the container.CC CHEN wrote: Greeting, I have put in the deflate function in the httpd.conf as below. During testing, the compression is working when I access my web page from internal IP address e.g.:http://x.x.x.x.Anyway when I access the web page using domain name e.g.: http://my.web.com, the compression is not working by looking at the apache access log. Can anyone help me to figure what is wrong with my httpd.conf file. Thank you. ### httpd.conf..# Insert filter # HTTP COMPRESSIONSetOutputFilter DEFLATE # Netscape 4.x has some problems...BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4 gzip-only-text/html# Netscape 4.06-4.08 have some more problemsBrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4\.0[678] no-gzip# MSIE masquerades as Netscape, but it is fine# BrowserMatch \bMSIE !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html# NOTE: Due to a bug in mod_setenvif up to Apache 2.0.48# the above regex won't work. You can use the following# workaround to get the desired effect:BrowserMatch \bMSI[E] !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html# Don't compress imagesSetEnvIfNoCase Request_URI \\.(?:gif|jpe?g|png)$ no-gzip dont-vary # Make sure proxies don't deliver the wrong content#Header append Vary User-Agent env=!dont-vary ###- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] self-referential URL's and load balancer
On 6/12/06, enigma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a problem with the self-referential URL's being generated by Apache when a hardware load balancer is front ending it. The load balancer listens on port 443, decrypts SSL and forwards standard http to Apache on port 13443 on the culster machines. The problem I encounter is when Apache generates self-referential URL's for mod_dir trailing slash redirects and mod_rewrite redirects, it is sending the protocol as http and the port as 13443. So for instance, the brower requests: https://www.example.com/test The redirect returned by Apache is: http://www.example.com:13443/test/ which is invalid on the load balancer and no longer SSL. I want it to be: https://www.example.com/test/ I have tried setting UseCanonicalName Off without success. I can remap the port with the port directive, but it still changes the https to http. Any suggestions?? We had an almost identical question two days ago (see below). Unfortunately, I don't believe there is any way to fix this completely from the apache side short of using the unreleased svn-head version of apache which allows the scheme to be specified with the ServerName directive. On 6/11/06, Damian Birchler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all I have got Squid installed as an httpd accelerator for httpd. Squid will not allow requests to internal.example.com other than per SSL/TLS. Squid itself talks to httpd in plain text. Now, when httpd generates automatic redirects -- what I mean by this, is for example redirecting /foo to /foo/ -- it tells the client to try HTTP://internal.example.com/foo/ which is then blocked by Squid. So, my question: Is it somehow possible to customize automatic redirects, for instance by telling httpd to use only relative paths? Relative paths are not legal in redirects. Squid probably has the capability to rewrite these headers itself (as apache's mod_proxy can do with the ProxyPassReverse directive). Otherwise, you can tell apache to lie about its true hostname using the ServerName and UseCanonicalName directives. But you will still have a problem with the scheme. The latest development version of apache allows you to configure ServerName to lie about the scheme, but I don't think any released version can do that. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You're flooding people's mailboxes
On Mon, June 12, 2006 3:54 pm, Carlos Ross wrote: > Hello, > > For two weeks I've been getting all of your messages...why all of a sudden > copy everybody? > Please stop broadcasting my mailbox is getting flooded and I have to > delete nearly 30 > messages everyday. Huh? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You're flooding people's mailboxes
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Carlos Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 13 juni 2006 00:55 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You're flooding people's mailboxes Hello, For two weeks I've been getting all of your messages...why all of a sudden copy everybody? Please stop broadcasting my mailbox is getting flooded and I have to delete nearly 30 messages everyday. Thanks!! - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] You're flooding people's mailboxes
Hello, For two weeks I've been getting all of your messages...why all of a sudden copy everybody? Please stop broadcasting my mailbox is getting flooded and I have to delete nearly 30 messages everyday. Thanks!! - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] self-referential URL's and load balancer
I have a problem with the self-referential URL's being generated by Apache when a hardware load balancer is front ending it. The load balancer listens on port 443, decrypts SSL and forwards standard http to Apache on port 13443 on the culster machines. The problem I encounter is when Apache generates self-referential URL's for mod_dir trailing slash redirects and mod_rewrite redirects, it is sending the protocol as http and the port as 13443. So for instance, the brower requests: https://www.example.com/test The redirect returned by Apache is: http://www.example.com:13443/test/ which is invalid on the load balancer and no longer SSL. I want it to be: https://www.example.com/test/ I have tried setting UseCanonicalName Off without success. I can remap the port with the port directive, but it still changes the https to http. Any suggestions?? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FilesMatch Explanation!
On 6/12/06, Zakai Kinan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I see. The way I used the filematch did not result in any errors. Apache seems to simply ignore the directive. The directory is already protected, but I wanted to restrict access to one script to one user within the directory. The user is part of the authentication for the directory in the htpasswd file. Show us the exact matching entry from the access_log along with the exact contents of the .htaccess file without obscuring everything. (I ask this because it is most likely you are making a simple mistake someplace. But we can't tell unless we see exactly what you are doing.) Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Error message "LocationMatch not allowed here"
On 6/12/06, Jesse Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello BP, You're right - this is a question of what is allowed in .htaccess files. Check out http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/mod/core.html#locationmatch, and look at the "Context" section. Since it doesn't include .htaccess, you can't use a LocationMatch in a .htaccess file. There isn't any AllowOverride which will change this. And in addition, trying to use in an .htaccess file indicates a problem anyway. should be used only for resources that don't live in the filesystem. .htaccess, on the other hand, is used only for resources that do live in the filesystem. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Error message "LocationMatch not allowed here"
Hello BP, You're right - this is a question of what is allowed in .htaccess files. Check out http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/mod/core.html#locationmatch, and look at the "Context" section. Since it doesn't include .htaccess, you can't use a LocationMatch in a .htaccess file. There isn't any AllowOverride which will change this. Take care, Jesse Ross Systems Administrator Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard [EMAIL PROTECTED] BP Jonsson wrote: Dear friends, I get an error message: "[alert] [client xxx] /home/account/public_html/.htaccess: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/howto/htaccess.html#what> It seems there should be an AllowOverride directive somewhere, but where? And what should it look like? Can I fix this problem or do I have to have the host admin do it? I'm aware this may be a FAQ. I have unsuccessfully looked around for an answer, but I don't really know how to formulate the question, so I ask your forgiveness and hope somebody has some advice. /BP - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FilesMatch Explanation!
I see. The way I used the filematch did not result in any errors. Apache seems to simply ignore the directive. The directory is already protected, but I wanted to restrict access to one script to one user within the directory. The user is part of the authentication for the directory in the htpasswd file. ZK --- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/9/06, Zakai Kinan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > The idea of requiring a specific user to access a > > script does not work. Secret is a perl script. > The > > restrictions on the directory work as expected. > > Man oh man. Please banish the phrase "does not > work" from your > vocabulary when you talk on a technical list. What > EXACTLY happens? > Do you get an error message? Do you get the content > when you were > expecting a password prompt? What is in the error > and access logs? > > Joshua. > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the > Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for > more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >" from the digest: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Error message "LocationMatch not allowed here"
Dear friends, I get an error message: "[alert] [client xxx] /home/account/public_html/.htaccess: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/howto/htaccess.html#what> It seems there should be an AllowOverride directive somewhere, but where? And what should it look like? Can I fix this problem or do I have to have the host admin do it? I'm aware this may be a FAQ. I have unsuccessfully looked around for an answer, but I don't really know how to formulate the question, so I ask your forgiveness and hope somebody has some advice. /BP - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: FilesMatch Explanation!
Yes, there is a user admin in the htpasswd file. No,
I did not have satisfy any as a directory directive so
I will try that.
Thanks
ZK
--- Joost de Heer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zakai Kinan wrote:
> > I have this directive
> >
> >require user "{Admin}"
> >
> >
> > in an htaccess file and it does not work. Does
> any
> > have any ideas. I have also tried it in
> httpd.conf
> > file.
>
> - Is the user really called {Admin} (with the {})?
> - Do you have a 'Satisfy any' for the directory the
> script is in?
>
> Joost
>
>
>
-
> The official User-To-User support forum of the
> Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for
> more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>" from the digest:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] segmentation fault
Yeah - I realize that code doesn't just 'go off', but if no-one tells me what they changed, I can't change it back. Yes - Mac OS X is a BSD-like OS By re-install, I meant rebuilt from source (I'll remember to be more specific in the future). All Modules are commented out, and I still get a segmentation fault. Thanks for the suggestionsany more? -Josh Boyle Owen wrote: -Original Message- From: Josh Stephenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 8:34 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] segmentation fault On an intel mac os x 10.4 with apache 2.2.0 I am getting a segmentation fault. Is that one of the BSD-like OSes? When I run apachectl start, I get: ./bin/apachectl: line 102: 359 Segmentation fault $HTTPD -k $ARGV Seg faults are often caused by inconsistent compilation - a (third-party) module compiled for one version of apache is loaded into a new version without being recompiled. This could also apply to external libraries (eg, openSSL, libstdc+, libgcc etc.) '359' changes randomly If I run httpd, I get: Segmentation fault I have not changed anything recently (other root-access users swear they haven't either), Despite the protests to the contrary, someone must've changed something on the machine - code doesn't "go off". so I have no idea why this is happening. I have tried completely reinstalling apache, and I still get the same error. When you usay you "re-installed" apache - is this a recompile from source, or RPM or binary or what? Any help is greatly appreciated. Try commenting out all the LoadModule lines from the config and associated directives and seeing if it will start. If so, put back the modules one at a time until you identify who's causing the seg fault. Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. -josh - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Diese E-mail ist eine private und persönliche Kommunikation. Sie hat keinen Bezug zur Börsen- bzw. Geschäftstätigkeit der SWX Gruppe. This e-mail is of a private and personal nature. It is not related to the exchange or business activities of the SWX Group. Le présent e-mail est un message privé et personnel, sans rapport avec l'activité boursière du Groupe SWX. This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pease help with mod_deflate configuration
no no what i meant was put it in the section which says . there should already be a section. CC CHEN wrote: Hi, It doesn't work at all if i replace with - Original Message - From: Emmanuel E To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 6:58 PM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pease help with mod_deflate configuration try putting it in the container. CC CHEN wrote: Greeting, I have put in the deflate function in the httpd.conf as below. During testing, the compression is working when I access my web page from internal IP address e.g.:http://x.x.x.x. Anyway when I access the web page using domain name e.g.: http://my.web.com, the compression is not working by looking at the apache access log. Can anyone help me to figure what is wrong with my httpd.conf file. Thank you. ### httpd.conf ... ... # Insert filter # HTTP COMPRESSION SetOutputFilter DEFLATE # Netscape 4.x has some problems... BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4 gzip-only-text/html # Netscape 4.06-4.08 have some more problems BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4\.0[678] no-gzip # MSIE masquerades as Netscape, but it is fine # BrowserMatch \bMSIE !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html # NOTE: Due to a bug in mod_setenvif up to Apache 2.0.48 # the above regex won't work. You can use the following # workaround to get the desired effect: BrowserMatch \bMSI[E] !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html # Don't compress images SetEnvIfNoCase Request_URI \ \.(?:gif|jpe?g|png)$ no-gzip dont-vary # Make sure proxies don't deliver the wrong content #Header append Vary User-Agent env=!dont-vary ### - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jsp/java servelets
> -Original Message- > From: Muhammad Rizwan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 7:07 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jsp/java servelets > > Hello > > I want to run jsp and java servelets pages on my Apache webserver, Start here: http://tomcat.apache.org/ NB - A java-enabled webserver is non-trivial. It is not as simple as adding a module or something... Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. > > How i can do sooo > > Thanks!!! > > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP > Server Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Diese E-mail ist eine private und persönliche Kommunikation. Sie hat keinen Bezug zur Börsen- bzw. Geschäftstätigkeit der SWX Gruppe. This e-mail is of a private and personal nature. It is not related to the exchange or business activities of the SWX Group. Le présent e-mail est un message privé et personnel, sans rapport avec l'activité boursière du Groupe SWX. This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Antwort: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jsp/java servelets
http://www.apachetomcat.com/home regards Dietmar Muhammad Rizwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> am 12.06.2006 19:06:36 Bitte antworten an users@httpd.apache.org An: users@httpd.apache.org Kopie: Thema: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jsp/java servelets Hello I want to run jsp and java servelets pages on my Apache webserver, How i can do sooo Thanks!!! - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jsp/java servelets
Hello I want to run jsp and java servelets pages on my Apache webserver, How i can do sooo Thanks!!! - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pease help with mod_deflate configuration
Hi, It doesn't work at all if i replace with - Original Message - From: Emmanuel E To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 6:58 PM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pease help with mod_deflate configuration try putting it in the container.CC CHEN wrote: Greeting, I have put in the deflate function in the httpd.conf as below. During testing, the compression is working when I access my web page from internal IP address e.g.:http://x.x.x.x.Anyway when I access the web page using domain name e.g.: http://my.web.com, the compression is not working by looking at the apache access log. Can anyone help me to figure what is wrong with my httpd.conf file. Thank you. ### httpd.conf..# Insert filter # HTTP COMPRESSIONSetOutputFilter DEFLATE # Netscape 4.x has some problems...BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4 gzip-only-text/html# Netscape 4.06-4.08 have some more problemsBrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4\.0[678] no-gzip# MSIE masquerades as Netscape, but it is fine# BrowserMatch \bMSIE !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html# NOTE: Due to a bug in mod_setenvif up to Apache 2.0.48# the above regex won't work. You can use the following# workaround to get the desired effect:BrowserMatch \bMSI[E] !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html# Don't compress imagesSetEnvIfNoCase Request_URI \\.(?:gif|jpe?g|png)$ no-gzip dont-vary # Make sure proxies don't deliver the wrong content#Header append Vary User-Agent env=!dont-vary ###- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pease help with mod_deflate configuration
try putting it in the container. CC CHEN wrote: Greeting, I have put in the deflate function in the httpd.conf as below. During testing, the compression is working when I access my web page from internal IP address e.g.:http://x.x.x.x. Anyway when I access the web page using domain name e.g.: http://my.web.com, the compression is not working by looking at the apache access log. Can anyone help me to figure what is wrong with my httpd.conf file. Thank you. ### httpd.conf ... ... # Insert filter # HTTP COMPRESSION SetOutputFilter DEFLATE # Netscape 4.x has some problems... BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4 gzip-only-text/html # Netscape 4.06-4.08 have some more problems BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4\.0[678] no-gzip # MSIE masquerades as Netscape, but it is fine # BrowserMatch \bMSIE !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html # NOTE: Due to a bug in mod_setenvif up to Apache 2.0.48 # the above regex won't work. You can use the following # workaround to get the desired effect: BrowserMatch \bMSI[E] !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html # Don't compress images SetEnvIfNoCase Request_URI \ \.(?:gif|jpe?g|png)$ no-gzip dont-vary # Make sure proxies don't deliver the wrong content #Header append Vary User-Agent env=!dont-vary ### - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pease help with mod_deflate configuration
Greeting, I have put in the deflate function in the httpd.conf as below. During testing, the compression is working when I access my web page from internal IP address e.g.:http://x.x.x.x.Anyway when I access the web page using domain name e.g.: http://my.web.com, the compression is not working by looking at the apache access log. Can anyone help me to figure what is wrong with my httpd.conf file. Thank you. ### httpd.conf..# Insert filter # HTTP COMPRESSIONSetOutputFilter DEFLATE # Netscape 4.x has some problems...BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4 gzip-only-text/html# Netscape 4.06-4.08 have some more problemsBrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4\.0[678] no-gzip# MSIE masquerades as Netscape, but it is fine# BrowserMatch \bMSIE !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html# NOTE: Due to a bug in mod_setenvif up to Apache 2.0.48# the above regex won't work. You can use the following# workaround to get the desired effect:BrowserMatch \bMSI[E] !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html# Don't compress imagesSetEnvIfNoCase Request_URI \\.(?:gif|jpe?g|png)$ no-gzip dont-vary # Make sure proxies don't deliver the wrong content#Header append Vary User-Agent env=!dont-vary ###
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Can I have negotiated includes?
Hi there. I am trying to find a solution to two problems, the first being: User requests /blah with "Accept-Language: fr, en;q=0.5" File blah.html is the only one available, gets served. File needs to include a common navigation bar. There are two available, /nav.en.inc and /nav.fr.inc File uses User gets navigation bar in English instead of French Now what I want is for the navigation element to use content negotiation, so that even though this particular file is not available in French, the user still gets the French nav bar. I tried using but that wouldn't let my pop-up menus appear (even with overflow: visible; set on the element, and & tags of the included file). Does anyone know how to do this? I am using version 1.3.33 The second problem is that in order to send my Last-Modified headers, I am using "xBitHack full", but this still suppresses the Accept- Ranges and ETag headers. Can this be amended somehow? ETags are very useful. p.s. Does anyone know what "TCN: choice" headers mean? - Nicholas. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PROPFIND record in access_log of apache2 under windows
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 11:29:12AM +0200, Francisco Ruiz Ibañez wrote: > No, the ip is from out of our network. Then I would think this is regular background noise. Anyway: As long as you do not offer DAV, you should be safe in this particular case. Rainer - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PROPFIND record in access_log of apache2 under windows
No, the ip is from out of our network. -Mensaje original- De: Rainer Sokoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: lunes, 12 de junio de 2006 11:05 Para: users@httpd.apache.org Asunto: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PROPFIND record in access_log of apache2 under windows On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:52:09AM +0200, Francisco Ruiz Ibañez wrote: > Hi all, > Last weekend, I've seen in my access_log many records like: > > "x.x.x.x - - [11/Jun/2006:00:09:14 +0200] "PROPFIND /pub/ HTTP/1.1" 405 325 > "-" "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600" > > This is in apache2 under windows: > > What does it mean? is it a malicious action like denial of service? Most probably not, if x.x.x.x belongs to your LAN. Background: If a windows box mounts a share (/pub/, in your case), it thinks that there might be a WebDAV share also. Stupid behaviour. Rainer - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Este correo electrónico contiene información privada que puede estar legalmente protegida, parcial o totalmente. Es sólo para uso del destinatario al que está dirigido. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que lo notifique al remitente del email y que además borre de su sistema el mensaje así como todas sus copias, incluyendo las posibles copias del mismo en su disco duro, y se abstenga de usar, revelar, distribuir a terceros, imprimir o copiar ninguna de las partes de este mensaje. Los datos personales que pueda contener el presente mensaje, ya sea en su contenido o en los destinatarios, cumplen con lo establecido en la Ley Orgánica 15/1999, de 13 de diciembre, de Protección Datos de Carácter Personal. This e-mail contains proprietary information some or all of which may be legally protected. It is for sole use of the intended recipient only. If you have received this message by mistake, you are requested to notify the e-mail sender and erase both the message and any copies from your system, including hard disk copies. You are further requested to refrain from using, distributing to third parties, printing or making copies of any parts of this message. The personal data that may appear in this e-mail message are in accordance with the Organic Law 15/1999 of 13 December on the Protection of Personal Data. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PROPFIND record in access_log of apache2 under windows
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:52:09AM +0200, Francisco Ruiz Ibañez wrote: > Hi all, > Last weekend, I've seen in my access_log many records like: > > "x.x.x.x - - [11/Jun/2006:00:09:14 +0200] "PROPFIND /pub/ HTTP/1.1" 405 325 > "-" "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600" > > This is in apache2 under windows: > > What does it mean? is it a malicious action like denial of service? Most probably not, if x.x.x.x belongs to your LAN. Background: If a windows box mounts a share (/pub/, in your case), it thinks that there might be a WebDAV share also. Stupid behaviour. Rainer - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PROPFIND record in access_log of apache2 under windows
Hi all, Last weekend, I've seen in my access_log many records like: "x.x.x.x - - [11/Jun/2006:00:09:14 +0200] "PROPFIND /pub/ HTTP/1.1" 405 325 "-" "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/5.1.2600" This is in apache2 under windows: What does it mean? is it a malicious action like denial of service? best regards Este correo electrónico contiene información privada que puede estar legalmente protegida, parcial o totalmente. Es sólo para uso del destinatario al que está dirigido. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que lo notifique al remitente del email y que además borre de su sistema el mensaje así como todas sus copias, incluyendo las posibles copias del mismo en su disco duro, y se abstenga de usar, revelar, distribuir a terceros, imprimir o copiar ninguna de las partes de este mensaje. Los datos personales que pueda contener el presente mensaje, ya sea en su contenido o en los destinatarios, cumplen con lo establecido en la Ley Orgánica 15/1999, de 13 de diciembre, de Protección Datos de Carácter Personal. This e-mail contains proprietary information some or all of which may be legally protected. It is for sole use of the intended recipient only. If you have received this message by mistake, you are requested to notify the e-mail sender and erase both the message and any copies from your system, including hard disk copies. You are further requested to refrain from using, distributing to third parties, printing or making copies of any parts of this message. The personal data that may appear in this e-mail message are in accordance with the Organic Law 15/1999 of 13 December on the Protection of Personal Data. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Authentication directive from 1.3 to 2.2 , what do i miss here?
> but now in 2.2 it does recognized that the page needs Authentication > but then > > in the logs it says : > > [Sun Jun 11 16:53:15 2006] [error] [client 1#2.1##.#.6#] No Authn > provider configured, referer: http://myhome:/blah.html > > [Sun Jun 11 16:53:15 2006] [error] [client 1#2.1##.#.6#] access to > /BLD/PER/none.foo failed, reason: verification of user > > id 'admin' not configured, referer: http://myhome:/blah.html > what im doing wrong here ? does the configuration changed ? do i miss > something in the configuration? The configuration for authentication in httpd 2.2 completely changed. See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/auth.html for an explanation on how the new authentication mechanism works. Joost - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
