Re: [us...@httpd] Sudden death
Frank, Francois Gingras wrote: Pasting the whole config file is not particularly useful. Sorry, newbie mode; won't happen again. If I don't do such in pe Postfix I will be shot, so I thought it might help in this message as well L-) Try tell us what the error log contains, or starting httpd with httpd X, or running it with gdb. Error log didn't say that much: [Sun Jul 12 07:21:38 2009] [info] (2)No such file or directory: make_sock: for port 80, setsockopt: (SO_ACCEPTFILTER) [Sun Jul 12 07:21:38 2009] [warn] pid file /var/run/httpd.pid overwritten -- Unclean shutdown of previous Apache run? With some help (thanks Jack) we found out that mod_unique_id.so was the one that caused the problem; after this it runs smoothly again. [Sun Jul 12 07:21:38 2009] [notice] Apache/1.3.41 (Unix) PHP/5.2.10 with Suhosin-Patch configured -- resuming normal operations [Sun Jul 12 07:21:38 2009] [info] Server built: Jun 12 2009 21:33:15 [Sun Jul 12 07:21:38 2009] [notice] Accept mutex: flock (Default: flock) [Sun Jul 12 07:22:01 2009] [info] removed PID file /var/run/httpd.pid (pid=49247) I really have no clue why these kind of flaws happen all of a sudden; that wouldn't be such a big problem if one could find the reason of that somewhere in a (system) log file. regards, Jos Chrispijn - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
[us...@httpd] Apache 1.3.x or 2.x ?
What I found out is that, with regards to Apache 1.3, Apache 2.0: - provides multi-threading support; - filtered input/output (I/O), which allows one module to modify the output of another module; - also provides support for SSL without any modifications to the core (|mod_tls). | Can someone tell me which of these advantages is, from a user perspective, the most important one? Did I miss other advantages? Jos Chrispijn
[us...@httpd] Help w/ "clean" uninstall
Hi! How do I do a "clean" (i.e., remove everything) uninstall? I'd like to uninstall Apache 2.2 from Windoes XP and start over. Thank you. Dr. T.
Re: [us...@httpd] Help w/ "clean" uninstall
Anthony Rodriguez wrote: Hi! How do I do a "clean" (i.e., remove everything) uninstall? I'd like to uninstall Apache 2.2 from Windoes XP and start over. The same way you uninstall any other software under Windows ; Start.. Settings .. System .. Software .. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [us...@httpd] Help w/ "clean" uninstall
Andre, Thank you. Don't I have to clean up the Windows' Registry? Dr. T. On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:13 AM, André Warnier wrote: > Anthony Rodriguez wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> How do I do a "clean" (i.e., remove everything) uninstall? >> >> I'd like to uninstall Apache 2.2 from Windoes XP and start over. >> >> The same way you uninstall any other software under Windows ; > Start.. Settings .. System .. Software .. > > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > >
[us...@httpd] chunked transfer-encoding and gzip content-encoding
Hello all, I've checked a lot of places in the web to find a answer to this doubt including this mailing list but could not find anything definitive. Hope this is a correct place ask this question. Would appreciate it much if anyone could point me in the right direction if not. The question is also posted at http://www.coderanch.com/t/453340/HTML-JavaScript/HTTP-content-encoding-transfer-encoding I posted a reply to that but still in doubt. The question is, supposing a response has the following headers Transfer-Encoding: chunked Content-Encoding: gzip According to http 1.1, do the chunks have to be decompressed chunk by chunk and then assembled or assemble the whole message and then decompress the whole message? Gamini.
Re: [us...@httpd] chunked transfer-encoding and gzip content-encoding
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:55 PM, thaakshana raala wrote: > Transfer-Encoding: chunked > Content-Encoding: gzip > According to http 1.1, > do the chunks have to be decompressed chunk by chunk and then assembled or > assemble the whole message and then decompress the whole message? > Gamini. Content-Encoding is on the "inside", so you dechunk then decompress. 7.2.1 Type When an entity-body is included with a message, the data type of that body is determined via the header fields Content-Type and Content- Encoding. These define a two-layer, ordered encoding model: entity-body := Content-Encoding( Content-Type( data ) ) 4.3 Message Body The message-body (if any) of an HTTP message is used to carry the entity-body associated with the request or response. The message-body differs from the entity-body only when a transfer-coding has been applied, as indicated by the Transfer-Encoding header field (section 14.41). message-body = entity-body | -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
