Re: [users@httpd] Access rules in an intranet
I think you don't need to use DirectoryMatch option in your config file. Replace DirectoryMatch with Directory option and add following code in it. Order deny,allow deny from all allow from 10.215.1.0/Directory -Anam From: Luís de Sousa luis.a.de.so...@gmail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org; Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, 14 June 2012, 12:19 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Access rules in an intranet Hi Anam, The config file has only two blocks: DirectoryMatch and IfModule, organised like this: DirectoryMatch /usr/share/phppgadmin/ ... IfModule mod_php4.c ... /IfModule ... /DirectoryMatch Where exactly should I put the Directory block? Thank you. On 13 June 2012 19:18, Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, Insert Directory block in virtual host container (configuration). It seems you have added in that area where Directory option is not allowed. -Anam
Re: [users@httpd] Access rules in an intranet
Hi, Insert Directory block in virtual host container (configuration). It seems you have added in that area where Directory option is not allowed. -Anam From: Luís de Sousa luis.a.de.so...@gmail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org; Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com Sent: Wednesday, 13 June 2012, 11:52 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Access rules in an intranet Hi Anam, Apache complains about it: Directory not allowed here. I suppose it doesn't like having two nested Directory blocks. Thank you in any case. On 12 June 2012 20:54, Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com wrote: Try the following configuration: Directory phppgadmin location Order deny,allow deny from all allow from 10.215.1.0 /Directory Replace phppgadmin location with the actual location whereyou have installed your application. Hope it will solve :) -Anam
Re: [users@httpd] Access rules in an intranet
Try the following configuration: Directory phppgadmin location Order deny,allow deny from all allow from 10.215.1.0 /Directory Replace phppgadmin location with the actual location whereyou have installed your application. Hope it will solve :) -Anam From: Luís de Sousa luis.a.de.so...@gmail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 12 June 2012, 14:55 Subject: [users@httpd] Access rules in an intranet Dear all, I'm configuring a server to which I have ssh access through an intranet. I'd like to open access to all nodes in the same IP range as mine to a particular application (phppgadmin). In the .conf file I have the following: order allow,deny deny from all allow from 10.215.xxx.xxx But this way I get the Forbidden error in the browser. I've also tried with: order allow,deny deny from all allow from 10.215 And even by specifying my IP: order allow,deny deny from all allow from 10.215.1.119 Still, I get the Forbidden error. The only way I found out to access this application is by using allow from all, which is not acceptable since this server will be going to the DMZ sometime. What am I doing wrong? Any further information I can provide to solve this issue? Thank you.
Re: [users@httpd] Help troubleshooting performance issue, after 1000 total children Apache no longer responds to HTTP requests. Not MaxClients issue?
PJ You have increased Max Open files setting BUT i think you should increased open files descriptor limit at operating system level. There is a linux kernel parameter file-max in /proc that does the trick. Try increasing to 1000. Hope this will help Thanks! Anam From: P J pauljfli...@gmail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Saturday, 5 May 2012, 0:20 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Help troubleshooting performance issue, after 1000 total children Apache no longer responds to HTTP requests. Not MaxClients issue? On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:18 PM, P J pauljfli...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org wrote: The closer MinSpareServers/MaxSpareServers are, the more time Apache needs to spend killing and creating child processes to ensure it stays within that narrow limit On May 3, 2012, at 2:40 PM, P J wrote: Thanks. Yes, I understand that. I set them both to that number to try and induce the issue we've been seeing. If I set: MinSpareServers 1024 MaxSpareServers 2048 1000+ simultaneous connections is not uncommon this server. This is unlikely to have a major effect on your issue, as I believe something strange is going on when you reach 1024 processes, but why do you have MinSpareServers so high? If you start 1024 children initially, and then 900 of them are busy, you are asking httpd to ensure there are at least 1924 children. It seems massive overkill to ensure that there are so many idle processes. If your high water mark is (say) 1536 clients, and you start 1024 processes, then I would go with settings like this: MinSpareServers 128 MaxSpareServers 1536 StartServers 1024 MaxClients 2048 ServerLimit 2048 So, you start with 1024 processes, increasing up to a maximum of 2048 processes. If there are ever more than 1536 processes idle, kill some off. Cheers Tom Thanks Tom, I agree. I don't normally have MinSpareServers at 1024, I was just trying to see if I can force it to throw the: [debug] mpm_common.c(663): (70007)The timeout specified has expired: connect to listener on [::]:80 error. error. Which I can. The million $ questions is what is the magic 1024 limit I'm hitting. I'll hopefully try with a later version of Apache and let the list know if that resolves it. Thanks again. -- PJ
Re: [users@httpd] Static content switching in Apache
I think forwarding a request from Apache will not create any overhead. If I use mod_proxy then how could i verify that response is return by the lightweight webserver (thttpd) Waiting for reply Regards, Anam From: Jaco Kroon j...@uls.co.za To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 29 February 2012, 14:14 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Static content switching in Apache H Anam, I'm with Tom on this one. The additional processing required in order to forward the request most likely far outweighs the lightweight benefit of using a lightweight server. I would recommend doing this the other way round if you would like to do this, so lightttpd receives the request, if it's static, serve it, if not, forward to apache. That way round you might actually get a benefit from using one of the lightweight http servers. Kind Regards, Jaco On 29/02/12 11:08, Anam Ali Khan wrote: Thank you Tom for your reply. I don't want to serve static content from Apache, i want to forward those requests to lightweight web servers and they should be capable to serve those content. From: Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org; Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, 28 February 2012, 19:54 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Static content switching in Apache On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, I would like to implement following configurations in Apache web server: Static content switching (forwarding) of files in Apache to lightweight web servers - Servers like thttpd/lightttpd Responce should be return directly by those lightweight web servers. mod_proxy will do that. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html Apache is quite capable of serving files from disk though, why not just let it? Cheers Tom - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Load Balancing, no fail over when backend server is down?
I think Apache mod_proxy do not support health checking for backend servers. -Anam From: Ryan Bowman ryanlbow...@gmail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 29 March 2012, 2:04 Subject: [users@httpd] Load Balancing, no fail over when backend server is down? Greetings I have recently setup Apache load balancing to two backend JBoss (5.1.0.GA) servers. Communication over AJP, with Sticky Sessions, (no session replication on the Jboss servers). I'm having a problem with both Apache 2.2.21 (SUSE 11.3) and 2.4.1 (CentOS 5-something, I think). I shut off one of the jboss nodes, the balancer-manager page shows that node's status as Err, yet Apache is still forwarding requests to that server, which results in a 503. Now, I'm making some assumptions here, but they seem pretty reasonable to me - if one of the nodes is in error status, I assume Apache would not send requests to it, even with Sticky Sessions. If I leave my cookies as is (with the jvmRoute to the node that is down), I get a 503 page, which is extremely not useful, and contrary to one of the main reasons we put in the second JBoss server. In order to get Apache to send requests to the server that is available, I have to either delete/modify the browser cookie, or set the node status to disabled. We have monitoring in place for the balancer-manager page, to alert me if the status of a node changes so I can set it to disabled if I need to, but it seems like Apache should not be sending traffic, even sticky traffic, to down nodes. But what I want is that if the node is down that all requests would go to the up node, sticky sessions be damned. If the user's session is broken/reset in the server switch, that is a small thing compared to getting a 503 page, making them think the site is down. Can someone please tell me what am I doing wrong? Proxy balancer://jbcluster BalancerMember ajp://jbtest1:8009 route=tn1 retry=0 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember ajp://jbtest2:8009 route=tn2 retry=0 loadfactor=1 ProxySet lbmethod=byrequests stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid scolonpathdelim=On nofailover=Off /Proxy ProxyPass /images ! ProxyPass /apache-info ! ProxyPass /apache-status ! ProxyPass /balancer-manager ! ProxyPassMatch ^(/|/cl/.*|/s/.*|/c/.*|/d/.*|/m/.*|/v/.*|/t/.*|/p/.*|/b/.*|/tw/.*)$ balancer://jbcluster ProxyPassMatch (\.do.*|\.jsp)$ balancer://jbcluster ProxyPassMatch (.*/styles/.*\.css|/scripts/.*\.js|/pie/PIE.htc)$ balancer://jbcluster thanks ryan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Different pages served depending on IP address or domain addressing
Create a separate vhost definition with same directive values as you configure in main server section. Define vhost definition in httpd.conf file. -Anam From: Prasanna Mulgaonkar prasanna.mulgaon...@gmail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Sunday, 18 March 2012, 2:45 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Different pages served depending on IP address or domain addressing The ServerAlias directive is only applicable in the virtual host section. Do I need to add a vhost definition? --p On 03/17/2012 10:21 AM, Anam Ali Khan wrote: Try this! UseCanonicalName Off ServerAlias www.mydomain.com Remove :80 in ServerName directive Make sure DNS records are properly configure. -Anam From: Prasanna Mulgaonkar prasanna.mulgaon...@gmail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Saturday, 17 March 2012, 5:17 Subject: [users@httpd] Different pages served depending on IP address or domain addressing Have a strange setup behavior that I have not been able to find an answer to. I have a server running Apache set up at IP address 50.X.Y.Z I have www.mydomain.com redirected from our domain hoster to that ip address. At the top level of that apache stack (/var/www/html), i have an index.html file that serves up correctly whether I enter http://www.mydomain.com or http://50.X.Y.Z into the browser address. I have an application in a subdirectory below the html file in /var/www/html/app. If I say http://50.X.Y.Z/app/, the app serves up correctly. We have been doing that for may months now. However, if I try http://www.mydomain.com/app/, I do not get the app–I get the same index.html file that is served as if the /app/ was not appended to the end of the mydomain.com. There are no errors or notices in the apache error file. The httpd.conf file declares ServerName www.mydomain.com:80 UseCanonicalName On There are no vhosts set up. What else should I look at to explain this odd behavior. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Different pages served depending on IP address or domain addressing
Try this! UseCanonicalName Off ServerAlias www.mydomain.com Remove :80 in ServerName directive Make sure DNS records are properly configure. -Anam From: Prasanna Mulgaonkar prasanna.mulgaon...@gmail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Saturday, 17 March 2012, 5:17 Subject: [users@httpd] Different pages served depending on IP address or domain addressing Have a strange setup behavior that I have not been able to find an answer to. I have a server running Apache set up at IP address 50.X.Y.Z I have www.mydomain.com redirected from our domain hoster to that ip address. At the top level of that apache stack (/var/www/html), i have an index.html file that serves up correctly whether I enter http://www.mydomain.com or http://50.X.Y.Z into the browser address. I have an application in a subdirectory below the html file in /var/www/html/app. If I say http://50.X.Y.Z/app/, the app serves up correctly. We have been doing that for may months now. However, if I try http://www.mydomain.com/app/, I do not get the app–I get the same index.html file that is served as if the /app/ was not appended to the end of the mydomain.com. There are no errors or notices in the apache error file. The httpd.conf file declares ServerName www.mydomain.com:80 UseCanonicalName On There are no vhosts set up. What else should I look at to explain this odd behavior. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing
Do not use session replication/sharing, use session stickiness instead. -Anam From: Igor Cicimov icici...@gmail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 14 March 2012, 14:48 Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing What is in apache log file, any proxy errors? I would do some extra logging if i was you as given in the below link: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy_balancer.html#stickyness_troubleshooting On Mar 14, 2012 8:28 PM, Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com wrote: Yes I have that same in server.xml on both tomcats. Thank you, Best Regards, Kashif Rahman From:Igor Cicimov [mailto:icici...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 2:21 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing Does the route parameters in the apache balancer tomcat1 and tomcat2 match the jvmRoute value in the tomcat connectors? On Mar 12, 2012 9:19 PM, Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com wrote: Here what I have used : == ProxyRequests Off Proxy * AddDefaultCharset Off Order deny,allow Allow from all /Proxy ProxyPass /balancer-manager ! ProxyPass /examples balancer://qawebcluster/examples ProxyPassReverse /examples balancer://qawebcluster/examples ProxyPass /kashif/admin ajp://x.x.x.x:18009/kashif/admin ProxyPassReverse /kashif/admin ajp://x.x.x.x:18009/kashif/admin #ProxyPass /kashif balancer://qawebcluster/kashif stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid #ProxyPassReverse /kashif balancer://qawebcluster/kashif stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid ProxyPass /kashif balancer://qawebcluster/kashif ProxyPassReverse /kashif balancer://qawebcluster/kashif ProxyPass /k balancer://qawebcluster/k stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid ProxyPassReverse /k balancer://qawebcluster/k stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid Proxy balancer://qawebcluster BalancerMember ajp://127.0.0.1:8009 route=tomcat1 disablereuse=On BalancerMember ajp://x.x.x.x:8009 route=tomcat2 disablereuse=On ProxySet lbmethod=byrequests /Proxy ProxyPreserveHost Off ProxyStatus On == We have this config on WEB1 as WEB2 both. 3 machines involved. 1 Apache only for load balancing and 2 machines as WEB1 and WEB2 having Apache and tomcat on each. We are using mod_proxy_ajp Tomcat is clustered. Session replication works, if single Apache is handling 2 tomcat instances. When we start second Apache, tomcat session replication stops. We want to have failover for PHP side too. Thank you, Regards, Kashif Rahman. From:Igor Cicimov [mailto:icici...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 2:12 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing You can at least tell us what OS are these servers running on? Also you said when you put second apache something is not working so we would like to see your apache config if you dont mind. Another thing not clear to me is tomcat session replication. Are the tomcats clustered? If not how do they replicate the sessions between each other? In meantime check mod_proxy_balancer documentation as possible solution. You can find lots of examples with sticky sessions configuration fot this module for tomcat backends. On Mar 12, 2012 6:19 PM, Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com wrote: Thanks Anam, but we are looking at to use mod proxy for Apache/Tomcat Communication and session persistence. Can it be done using our requirement? Thank you, Regards, Kashif Rahman. From:Anam Ali Khan [mailto:anamalik...@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 7:44 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Cc: Kashif Rahman Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing Hi, I would recommend HAProxy as a load balancer in your PHP + JSP application environment. It will work as follows: 1. First HAProxy will accept client request. 2. It will forward those requests to two machines via round robin 3. Each WebServer must use mod_jk as a connector (module) for Apache/Tomcat communication and session persistence. 4. HAproxy also perform health checking for two servers. -Anam From:Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, 9 March 2012, 11:36 Subject: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing Hi, We have requirement for to load balance our PHP + JSP application. I need to know that how can I load balance 2 Apache web Servers and 2 Tomcat Servers, 1st Web Server + Tomcat on 1st machine and 2nd Web Server + Tomcat on 2nd machine. We want to use Proxy Load Balancer for Apache to tomcat communication. If we use single Apache Web Server and 2 tomcat instances on different machines, it seems to be working and sharing session fine, but when we add 2nd apache web server to
Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing
Why are you defining mod_proxy_balancer directives in WEB1 WEB2. You only need to configure these in Apache Load Balancer machine. Correct me if i am wrong. -Anam From: Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com To: users@httpd.apache.org users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 15 March 2012, 22:13 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing Do not use session replication/sharing, use session stickiness instead. -Anam From: Igor Cicimov icici...@gmail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 14 March 2012, 14:48 Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing What is in apache log file, any proxy errors? I would do some extra logging if i was you as given in the below link: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy_balancer.html#stickyness_troubleshooting On Mar 14, 2012 8:28 PM, Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com wrote: Yes I have that same in server.xml on both tomcats. Thank you, Best Regards, Kashif Rahman From:Igor Cicimov [mailto:icici...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 2:21 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing Does the route parameters in the apache balancer tomcat1 and tomcat2 match the jvmRoute value in the tomcat connectors? On Mar 12, 2012 9:19 PM, Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com wrote: Here what I have used : == ProxyRequests Off Proxy * AddDefaultCharset Off Order deny,allow Allow from all /Proxy ProxyPass /balancer-manager ! ProxyPass /examples balancer://qawebcluster/examples ProxyPassReverse /examples balancer://qawebcluster/examples ProxyPass /kashif/admin ajp://x.x.x.x:18009/kashif/admin ProxyPassReverse /kashif/admin ajp://x.x.x.x:18009/kashif/admin #ProxyPass /kashif balancer://qawebcluster/kashif stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid #ProxyPassReverse /kashif balancer://qawebcluster/kashif stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid ProxyPass /kashif balancer://qawebcluster/kashif ProxyPassReverse /kashif balancer://qawebcluster/kashif ProxyPass /k balancer://qawebcluster/k stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid ProxyPassReverse /k balancer://qawebcluster/k stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid Proxy balancer://qawebcluster BalancerMember ajp://127.0.0.1:8009 route=tomcat1 disablereuse=On BalancerMember ajp://x.x.x.x:8009 route=tomcat2 disablereuse=On ProxySet lbmethod=byrequests /Proxy ProxyPreserveHost Off ProxyStatus On == We have this config on WEB1 as WEB2 both. 3 machines involved. 1 Apache only for load balancing and 2 machines as WEB1 and WEB2 having Apache and tomcat on each. We are using mod_proxy_ajp Tomcat is clustered. Session replication works, if single Apache is handling 2 tomcat instances. When we start second Apache, tomcat session replication stops. We want to have failover for PHP side too. Thank you, Regards, Kashif Rahman. From:Igor Cicimov [mailto:icici...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 2:12 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing You can at least tell us what OS are these servers running on? Also you said when you put second apache something is not working so we would like to see your apache config if you dont mind. Another thing not clear to me is tomcat session replication. Are the tomcats clustered? If not how do they replicate the sessions between each other? In meantime check mod_proxy_balancer documentation as possible solution. You can find lots of examples with sticky sessions configuration fot this module for tomcat backends. On Mar 12, 2012 6:19 PM, Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com wrote: Thanks Anam, but we are looking at to use mod proxy for Apache/Tomcat Communication and session persistence. Can it be done using our requirement? Thank you, Regards, Kashif Rahman. From:Anam Ali Khan [mailto:anamalik...@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 7:44 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Cc: Kashif Rahman Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing Hi, I would recommend HAProxy as a load balancer in your PHP + JSP application environment. It will work as follows: 1. First HAProxy will accept client request. 2. It will forward those requests to two machines via round robin 3. Each WebServer must use mod_jk as a connector (module) for Apache/Tomcat communication and session persistence. 4. HAproxy also perform health checking for two servers. -Anam From:Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, 9 March 2012, 11:36 Subject: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing Hi, We have requirement for to load balance our PHP + JSP application. I need to know that how
Re: [users@httpd] htaccess
Yes, Apache access.htaccess only at that point where you inserted AllowOverride in the directory container. It also saves a little disk io load on web server :) -Anam From: Nick Edwards nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com To: users users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 14 March 2012, 11:41 Subject: [users@httpd] htaccess Hi, Just trying to clarify it is best to allow these in the virtualhost root on a per domain For instance at present we have Directory / AllowOverride None Options None Require all denied /Directory I know this is good :) But then we have Directory /var/www AllowOverride AuthConfig Options +Indexes /Directory now assume each virtualhosts web root is under /var/www/virtuals/domain.name/var/www/html I understand that current setup means apache looks in all dirs up to /var/www So, am I assuming it is best in each virtualhost container I am better off using a directory container like directory /var/www/virtuals/domain.name/var/www/html? AllowOverride AuthConfig /directory and removing authconfig from the /var/www I am thinking this saves a little performance as it then only looks for .htaccess in /var/www/virtuals/domain.name/var/www/html /var/www/virtuals/domain.name/var/www/html/blog/ /var/www/virtuals/domain.name/var/www/html/blog/includes rather than going up the chain further, is that correct? 3 looks versus 8 ? Also seeing segfaults still occasionally, no further info on that, with 2K hosts a machine it is impossible to peruse every log trying to track down what host/request caused it. Also (they say things come in threes!) any comments on previous post a few days ago re crazy logging :- Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing
First check Apache supports session stickness in PHP application environment, if yes then you can go with your current configuration instead of HAproxy. -Anam From: Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com To: users@httpd.apache.org; 'Anam Ali Khan' anamalik...@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2012, 2:45 Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing So what solution you would recommend and what is best option for session sharing? Thank you, Best Regards, Kashif Rahman -Original Message- From: Tom Evans [mailto:tevans...@googlemail.com] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 9:49 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org; Anam Ali Khan Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, It looks like very complex configuration in your application environment. You can achieve the same with HAProxy example as given before. Why opt for complex configuration instead of easy available solution. Thanks, Anam Your non-complex solution involves replacing the load balancing httpd server with a load balancing HAProxy server. I fail to see how that decreases complexity. You have to learn how to configure two things, instead of one thing twice. HAProxy also cannot serve static files, whilst a load balancing httpd can. Cheers Tom - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing
Dear Kashif, as per your comments below: We are using mod_proxy_ajp Tomcat is clustered. Session replication works, if single Apache is handling 2 tomcat instances. When we start second Apache, tomcat session replication stops. We want to have failover for PHP side too. Why are you using mod_proxy_ajp module. You should use mod_proxy_balancer. For PHP load balancing and session stickiness it can easily be implemented using cookie based approach. And one more interesting thing is that you should use less request counting method to handle Load Balancing efficiently. Please follow the documentation carefully. You can achieve your goal instead of HAproxy solution. Thanks, Anam From: Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com To: Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com; users@httpd.apache.org users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2012, 14:13 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing First check Apache supports session stickness in PHP application environment, if yes then you can go with your current configuration instead of HAproxy. -Anam From: Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com To: users@httpd.apache.org; 'Anam Ali Khan' anamalik...@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2012, 2:45 Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing So what solution you would recommend and what is best option for session sharing? Thank you, Best Regards, Kashif Rahman -Original Message- From: Tom Evans [mailto:tevans...@googlemail.com] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 9:49 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org; Anam Ali Khan Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, It looks like very complex configuration in your application environment. You can achieve the same with HAProxy example as given before. Why opt for complex configuration instead of easy available solution. Thanks, Anam Your non-complex solution involves replacing the load balancing httpd server with a load balancing HAProxy server. I fail to see how that decreases complexity. You have to learn how to configure two things, instead of one thing twice. HAProxy also cannot serve static files, whilst a load balancing httpd can. Cheers Tom - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing
Last but not the least mod_proxy_balancer supports AJP protocol :) -Anam From: Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com To: users@httpd.apache.org users@httpd.apache.org; Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2012, 23:07 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing Dear Kashif, as per your comments below: We are using mod_proxy_ajp Tomcat is clustered. Session replication works, if single Apache is handling 2 tomcat instances. When we start second Apache, tomcat session replication stops. We want to have failover for PHP side too. Why are you using mod_proxy_ajp module. You should use mod_proxy_balancer. For PHP load balancing and session stickiness it can easily be implemented using cookie based approach. And one more interesting thing is that you should use less request counting method to handle Load Balancing efficiently. Please follow the documentation carefully. You can achieve your goal instead of HAproxy solution. Thanks, Anam From: Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com To: Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com; users@httpd.apache.org users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2012, 14:13 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing First check Apache supports session stickness in PHP application environment, if yes then you can go with your current configuration instead of HAproxy. -Anam From: Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com To: users@httpd.apache.org; 'Anam Ali Khan' anamalik...@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2012, 2:45 Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing So what solution you would recommend and what is best option for session sharing? Thank you, Best Regards, Kashif Rahman -Original Message- From: Tom Evans [mailto:tevans...@googlemail.com] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 9:49 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org; Anam Ali Khan Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, It looks like very complex configuration in your application environment. You can achieve the same with HAProxy example as given before. Why opt for complex configuration instead of easy available solution. Thanks, Anam Your non-complex solution involves replacing the load balancing httpd server with a load balancing HAProxy server. I fail to see how that decreases complexity. You have to learn how to configure two things, instead of one thing twice. HAProxy also cannot serve static files, whilst a load balancing httpd can. Cheers Tom - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing
Hello, It looks like very complex configuration in your application environment. You can achieve the same with HAProxy example as given before. Why opt for complex configuration instead of easy available solution. Thanks, Anam From: Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Monday, 12 March 2012, 15:17 Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing Here what I have used : == ProxyRequests Off Proxy * AddDefaultCharset Off Order deny,allow Allow from all /Proxy ProxyPass /balancer-manager ! ProxyPass /examples balancer://qawebcluster/examples ProxyPassReverse /examples balancer://qawebcluster/examples ProxyPass /kashif/admin ajp://x.x.x.x:18009/kashif/admin ProxyPassReverse /kashif/admin ajp://x.x.x.x:18009/kashif/admin #ProxyPass /kashif balancer://qawebcluster/kashif stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid #ProxyPassReverse /kashif balancer://qawebcluster/kashif stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid ProxyPass /kashif balancer://qawebcluster/kashif ProxyPassReverse /kashif balancer://qawebcluster/kashif ProxyPass /k balancer://qawebcluster/k stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid ProxyPassReverse /k balancer://qawebcluster/k stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid Proxy balancer://qawebcluster BalancerMember ajp://127.0.0.1:8009 route=tomcat1 disablereuse=On BalancerMember ajp://x.x.x.x:8009 route=tomcat2 disablereuse=On ProxySet lbmethod=byrequests /Proxy ProxyPreserveHost Off ProxyStatus On == We have this config on WEB1 as WEB2 both. 3 machines involved. 1 Apache only for load balancing and 2 machines as WEB1 and WEB2 having Apache and tomcat on each. We are using mod_proxy_ajp Tomcat is clustered. Session replication works, if single Apache is handling 2 tomcat instances. When we start second Apache, tomcat session replication stops. We want to have failover for PHP side too. Thank you, Regards, Kashif Rahman. From:Igor Cicimov [mailto:icici...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 2:12 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing You can at least tell us what OS are these servers running on? Also you said when you put second apache something is not working so we would like to see your apache config if you dont mind. Another thing not clear to me is tomcat session replication. Are the tomcats clustered? If not how do they replicate the sessions between each other? In meantime check mod_proxy_balancer documentation as possible solution. You can find lots of examples with sticky sessions configuration fot this module for tomcat backends. On Mar 12, 2012 6:19 PM, Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com wrote: Thanks Anam, but we are looking at to use mod proxy for Apache/Tomcat Communication and session persistence. Can it be done using our requirement? Thank you, Regards, Kashif Rahman. From:Anam Ali Khan [mailto:anamalik...@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 7:44 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Cc: Kashif Rahman Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing Hi, I would recommend HAProxy as a load balancer in your PHP + JSP application environment. It will work as follows: 1. First HAProxy will accept client request. 2. It will forward those requests to two machines via round robin 3. Each WebServer must use mod_jk as a connector (module) for Apache/Tomcat communication and session persistence. 4. HAproxy also perform health checking for two servers. -Anam From:Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, 9 March 2012, 11:36 Subject: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing Hi, We have requirement for to load balance our PHP + JSP application. I need to know that how can I load balance 2 Apache web Servers and 2 Tomcat Servers, 1st Web Server + Tomcat on 1st machine and 2nd Web Server + Tomcat on 2nd machine. We want to use Proxy Load Balancer for Apache to tomcat communication. If we use single Apache Web Server and 2 tomcat instances on different machines, it seems to be working and sharing session fine, but when we add 2nd apache web server to have fail over for PHP too, tomcat stops replicating session? If anyone is running such type of setup then kindly do let me know what could be the issues or anything missing. I am using Apache WebServer as a load balancer for both Apache too. Apache Webserver |
Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing
Hi,I would recommend HAProxy as a load balancer in your PHP + JSP application environment. It will work as follows:1. First HAProxy will accept client request.2. It will forward those requests to two machines via round robin3. Each WebServer must use mod_jk as a connector (module) for Apache/Tomcat communication and sessionpersistence.4. HAproxy also perform health checking for two servers.-Anam From: Kashif Rahman kashif.rah...@vopium.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, 9 March 2012, 11:36 Subject: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing Hi, We have requirement for to load balance our PHP + JSP application. I need to know that how can I load balance 2 Apache web Servers and 2 Tomcat Servers, 1st Web Server + Tomcat on 1st machine and 2nd Web Server + Tomcat on 2nd machine. We want to use Proxy Load Balancer for Apache to tomcat communication.If we use single Apache Web Server and 2 tomcat instances on different machines, it seems to be working and sharing session fine, but when we add 2nd apache web server to have fail over for PHP too, tomcat stops replicating session? If anyone is running such type of setup then kindly do let me know what could be the issues or anything missing. I am using Apache WebServer as a load balancer for both Apache too. Apache Webserver | | _ |__ | | Apache Webserver Apache Webserver | | Tomcat Tomcat What could be the recommended solution for this requirement? Thank you, Best Regards,Kashif RahmanPrincipal SCM Engineer Vopium A/S | Office# 2, 7th Floor, Shaheen Complex | 38 Abbot RoadLahore | Pakistan | t + 92 42 6316491 | f + 92 42 6316492 + 92 334 9771227 | kashif_r | w www.vopium.com
Re: [users@httpd] What's the name of the http server on my Ubuntu: httpd or apache2?
I think it is not so important to call Apache web server as apache2 in any distribution. The truth is that the proper name of Apache Web Server is httpd which is why Apache Software Foundation call by this name. -Anam From: Mathijs mathijs...@gmail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Cc: julioser...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, 6 March 2012, 3:19 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] What's the name of the http server on my Ubuntu: httpd or apache2? The Debian/Ubuntu distributions, or rather their Apache HTTPD package maintainers, have renamed the binary to apache2, amongst other modifications. This was mainly done to differentiate between Apache 1.x and Apache 2.x, but its use is mostly void nowadays. Some other changes and layout peculiarities are listed here: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DebianDeb0rkification On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Julio Sergio julioser...@gmail.com wrote: I'm very puzzled with this simple question: the name of the http server is httpd or apache2? This is because, all apache documentation, in http.apache.org, refers to it as httpd, however in my Ubuntu installation it appears to be apache2. Were not I someone that has some idea of this, I would be certainly lost. I don't know who to blame for this: Apache, Ubuntu or both? Do you have any comments? Thanks, -Sergio. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org -- Gr, Mathijs
Re: [users@httpd] viurtual management
Create a symbolic link in each domain document root. -Anam From: Pete Houston p...@openstrike.co.uk To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, 2 March 2012, 15:17 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] viurtual management On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 08:06:55PM +1000, Nick Edwards wrote: With a lot of virtual hosts, is it possible to have a sort of global ( /admin ) directory, which uses a specific dir elsewhere, that everyone is referenced to when they type their.domain/admin Sounds like an Alias to me. Any reason not to set an alias in your main conf? eg. Alias /admin /path/to/global/admin Pete -- Openstrike - improving business through open source http://www.openstrike.co.uk/ or call 01722 770036 / 07092 020107
Re: [users@httpd] public_html directory authentication
Hello, Try with this configuration: Directory /home/username/public_html/Private AuthType Basic AuthUserFile /home/username/public_html/Private/.htpasswd AuthName Test Require valid-user AllowOverride All Order allow,deny Allow from all /Directory chmod 644 /home/username/public_html/Private/.htpasswd chown root:apache /home/username/public_html/Private/.htpasswd Note: You dont need to store password file in a publicly accessible directory, i think it can be a security risk. -Anam From: John D javadevelope...@gmail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, 2 March 2012, 0:48 Subject: [users@httpd] public_html directory authentication I'm running Apache/2.2.3 on a centos 5 server and trying to setup authentication for a subdirectory in a user's public_html folder. I created a .htaccess file and .htpasswd file in that subdirectory with permissions 0644. But now the subdirectory does not show up on the web page. In my httpd.conf file I have: Directory /home/*/public_html AllowOverride AuthConfig /Directory I've also tried adding this to the httpd conf file Directory /home/username/public_html/Private AuthType Basic AuthUserFile /home/username/public_html/Private/.htpasswd AuthName Test Require valid-user /Directory but that also doesn't seem to work. The only thing that works a bit for me is to set AllowOverride to None in the /home/*/public_html directory config but that just enables the folder to show and does no authentication. Can anyone help me? Thanks
Re: [users@httpd] Problems with cgi scripts and Apache's log.
You can try following configuration in Apache virtual host container. LocationMatch ^[/]cgi-bin[/](*)\.dll)$ Order deny,allow Deny from all /LocationMatch SetEnvIfNoCase Request_URI ^[/]cgi-bin[/](*)\.dll)$ dontlog CustomLog/var/log/httpd/access_log combined env=!dontlog First will deny allow requests that ending in dll extension and next directives will not logged those requests in Apache logs. Regards, Anam From: Antonio Fernández Pérez antoniofernan...@fabergames.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 1 March 2012, 22:02 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Problems with cgi scripts and Apache's log. Thanks for all answers. I had some doubts about this. I think that is interesting log all data (accesses or errors). I 'm afraid these logs are growing a lot, I don't know if this is bad. I should to define some directives with my partners and we should to decide what to do with this. Thanks for your help. Best regards, Toni. El 1 de marzo de 2012 17:54, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com escribió: Which do you want: to stop the logfiles from growing or deny the requests? Or both? On Mar 1, 2012, at 11:40 AM, Antonio Fernández Pérez wrote: Hi again, My apologies for these messages. Now, I have checked it and is growing the access log file. How can I do to deny these requests? I'm trying to configure Apache to deny all requests that tries to execute .dll files ind cgi-bin directory. Any idea? I don't know how can I do it. Thanks. Best regards, Toni. El 1 de marzo de 2012 17:09, Antonio Fernández Pérez antoniofernan...@fabergames.com escribió: Thanks for your help. I have gotten it doing this: AliasMatch ^/cgi-bin/(.*)\.dll$ /var/www/go_away.html Now Apache doesn't log errors about dll loads. Do you think that is it correct? Thanks. Best regards, Toni. El 1 de marzo de 2012 16:32, Antonio Fernández Pérez antoniofernan...@fabergames.com escribió: I put an error log output. Thanks, [Thu Mar 01 16:31:10 2012] [error] [client 80.24.29.20] script not found or unable to stat: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/cgi-bin/cbws1084x.dll [Thu Mar 01 16:31:12 2012] [error] [client 88.23.110.4] script not found or unable to stat: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/cgi-bin/cbws1084x.dll [Thu Mar 01 16:31:12 2012] [error] [client 217.127.6.33] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:13 2012] [error] [client 212.36.73.27] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:14 2012] [error] [client 217.126.29.45] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:14 2012] [error] [client 83.34.151.133] (13)Permission denied: exec of '/var/www/go_away.html' failed [Thu Mar 01 16:31:14 2012] [error] [client 83.34.151.133] Premature end of script headers: go_away.html [Thu Mar 01 16:31:14 2012] [error] [client 83.42.159.135] (13)Permission denied: exec of '/var/www/go_away.html' failed [Thu Mar 01 16:31:14 2012] [error] [client 83.42.159.135] Premature end of script headers: go_away.html [Thu Mar 01 16:31:14 2012] [error] [client 79.148.190.156] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:16 2012] [error] [client 80.34.128.246] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:17 2012] [error] [client 83.55.242.122] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:17 2012] [error] [client 88.18.154.61] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:17 2012] [error] [client 217.127.7.73] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:17 2012] [error] [client 80.28.208.232] (13)Permission denied: exec of '/var/www/go_away.html' failed [Thu Mar 01 16:31:17 2012] [error] [client 80.28.208.232] Premature end of script headers: go_away.html [Thu Mar 01 16:31:17 2012] [error] [client 217.127.7.73] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:18 2012] [error] [client 80.35.91.44] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:18 2012] [error] [client 88.27.241.160] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin El 1 de marzo de 2012 16:24, Antonio Fernández Pérez antoniofernan...@fabergames.com escribió: Hi again, I have tried to configure this in my virtualhost of Apache but does not works. I have defined in virtualhost config file this: Alias /cgi-bin/cbws1084.dll /var/www/go_away.html Then, I have executed #service apache2 reload, the Apache's error log continues growing a lot (because continues .dll request). Something is wrong in my configuration. Please help me. Thanks. Best regards, Toni. El 1 de marzo de 2012 15:47, Steve Swift swi...@swiftys.org.uk escribió: My
Re: [users@httpd] Problems with cgi scripts and Apache's log.
Place SetEnvIfNoCase in a single line. Sorrt, first will deny ALL requests that ending in dll extension and next directives will not logged those requests in Apache logs. Thanks, Anam From: Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com To: users@httpd.apache.org users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, 2 March 2012, 0:27 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Problems with cgi scripts and Apache's log. You can try following configuration in Apache virtual host container. LocationMatch ^[/]cgi-bin[/](*)\.dll)$ Order deny,allow Deny from all /LocationMatch SetEnvIfNoCase Request_URI ^[/]cgi-bin[/](*)\.dll)$ dontlog CustomLog/var/log/httpd/access_log combined env=!dontlog First will deny allow requests that ending in dll extension and next directives will not logged those requests in Apache logs. Regards, Anam From: Antonio Fernández Pérez antoniofernan...@fabergames.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 1 March 2012, 22:02 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Problems with cgi scripts and Apache's log. Thanks for all answers. I had some doubts about this. I think that is interesting log all data (accesses or errors). I 'm afraid these logs are growing a lot, I don't know if this is bad. I should to define some directives with my partners and we should to decide what to do with this. Thanks for your help. Best regards, Toni. El 1 de marzo de 2012 17:54, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com escribió: Which do you want: to stop the logfiles from growing or deny the requests? Or both? On Mar 1, 2012, at 11:40 AM, Antonio Fernández Pérez wrote: Hi again, My apologies for these messages. Now, I have checked it and is growing the access log file. How can I do to deny these requests? I'm trying to configure Apache to deny all requests that tries to execute .dll files ind cgi-bin directory. Any idea? I don't know how can I do it. Thanks. Best regards, Toni. El 1 de marzo de 2012 17:09, Antonio Fernández Pérez antoniofernan...@fabergames.com escribió: Thanks for your help. I have gotten it doing this: AliasMatch ^/cgi-bin/(.*)\.dll$ /var/www/go_away.html Now Apache doesn't log errors about dll loads. Do you think that is it correct? Thanks. Best regards, Toni. El 1 de marzo de 2012 16:32, Antonio Fernández Pérez antoniofernan...@fabergames.com escribió: I put an error log output. Thanks, [Thu Mar 01 16:31:10 2012] [error] [client 80.24.29.20] script not found or unable to stat: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/cgi-bin/cbws1084x.dll [Thu Mar 01 16:31:12 2012] [error] [client 88.23.110.4] script not found or unable to stat: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/cgi-bin/cbws1084x.dll [Thu Mar 01 16:31:12 2012] [error] [client 217.127.6.33] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:13 2012] [error] [client 212.36.73.27] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:14 2012] [error] [client 217.126.29.45] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:14 2012] [error] [client 83.34.151.133] (13)Permission denied: exec of '/var/www/go_away.html' failed [Thu Mar 01 16:31:14 2012] [error] [client 83.34.151.133] Premature end of script headers: go_away.html [Thu Mar 01 16:31:14 2012] [error] [client 83.42.159.135] (13)Permission denied: exec of '/var/www/go_away.html' failed [Thu Mar 01 16:31:14 2012] [error] [client 83.42.159.135] Premature end of script headers: go_away.html [Thu Mar 01 16:31:14 2012] [error] [client 79.148.190.156] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:16 2012] [error] [client 80.34.128.246] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:17 2012] [error] [client 83.55.242.122] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:17 2012] [error] [client 88.18.154.61] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:17 2012] [error] [client 217.127.7.73] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:17 2012] [error] [client 80.28.208.232] (13)Permission denied: exec of '/var/www/go_away.html' failed [Thu Mar 01 16:31:17 2012] [error] [client 80.28.208.232] Premature end of script headers: go_away.html [Thu Mar 01 16:31:17 2012] [error] [client 217.127.7.73] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:18 2012] [error] [client 80.35.91.44] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin [Thu Mar 01 16:31:18 2012] [error] [client 88.27.241.160] File does not exist: /var/www/www.fabergames.net/Fabergames/cgi-bin El 1 de marzo de 2012 16:24, Antonio Fernández Pérez antoniofernan...@fabergames.com escribió: Hi again, I have tried to configure this in my virtualhost of Apache
Re: [users@httpd] Static content switching in Apache
Thank you Tom for your reply. I don't want to serve static content from Apache, i want to forward those requests to lightweight web servers and they should be capable to serve those content. From: Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org; Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, 28 February 2012, 19:54 Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Static content switching in Apache On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Anam Ali Khan anamalik...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, I would like to implement following configurations in Apache web server: Static content switching (forwarding) of files in Apache to lightweight web servers - Servers like thttpd/lightttpd Responce should be return directly by those lightweight web servers. mod_proxy will do that. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html Apache is quite capable of serving files from disk though, why not just let it? Cheers Tom - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
[users@httpd] Static content switching in Apache
Hello, I would like to implement following configurations in Apache web server: 1. Static content switching (forwarding) of files in Apache to lightweight web servers - Servers like thttpd/lightttpd 2. Responce should be return directly by those lightweight web servers. Waiting of your prompt responce. Thank you Anam
