[users@httpd] APACHE MODULE CSRF
Guys, good afternoon ... I have the following situation: - I have a WEB application running on a WILDFLY-10.1.0 application server; - On the same machine, there is an APACHE on the front with the following configurations: CSRF_Enable on CSRF_Action deny CSRF_EnableReferer off CSRF_ScriptPath https ://mysite.com/web/js/csrf.js <https://meusite.com.br/web/js/csrf.js> With this scenario it works, the problem is when APACHE is on another machine (one machine for APACHE and one for WILDFLY) ... it seems that APACHE can not inject the script and the following error message appears in the console of my browser when I make a request: Forddden: You do not have permission to access ... Has anyone ever had a similar situation? tks Abraços, *Ricardo Fernando Neves* *Desenvolvimento* COURIER DE FLASH Site: www.flashcourier.com.br "Esta mensagem e seus anexos são dirigidos exclusivamente para os seus destinatários, podendo conter informação confidencial e/ou legalmente privilegiada. Se você não for destinatário desta mensagem, não deve revelar, copiar, distribuir ou de qualquer forma utilizá-la. A Flash Courier não se responsabiliza por alterações no conteúdo desta mensagem depois do seu envio." -- "Esta mensagem e seus anexos são dirigidos exclusivamente para os seus destinatários, podendo conter informação confidencial e/ou legalmente privilegiada. Se você não for destinatário desta mensagem, não deve revelar, copiar, distribuir ou de qualquer forma utilizá-la. A empresa não se responsabiliza por alterações no conteúdo desta mensagem depois do seu envio."
[users@httpd] Apache 2.4 timeouts/connection refused under high load. Works fine with version 2.2
Hi, I'm running Apache 2.4 (prefork) on a Centos 7 server. The server specs are pretty good: 2 x Xeon E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz, 512GB of RAM and 8 SSDs in RAID 10. This Apache server is used to run a PHP software and serve a few static files, although most of the static files are cached in our CDN service. The normal load is between 8 and 15 but, due to the server specs, it's very responsive. Also, the number of requests/sec is usually below 300. I noticed that sometimes Apache 2.4 will timeout or refuse connections *even for local requests*. This happens when the requests/sec is higher than 400 and/or the load is 20+. Some notes: 1) The Apache error log doesn't show any errors at all. Increasing the verbosity of log also doesn't show anything related when the issue happens. 2) Even when this happens, the server is responsive. I can access it using SSH and other services works fine. 3) I have munin installed. When the issue happens at least 50% the RAM is free, CPU usage is ~70% and the I/O usage is very low. I tried some tests changing lots of settings related to StartServers, MinSpareServers, Timeout etc. but nothing worked. Then, I decided to downgrade to Apache 2.2 keeping the configuration as close as possible. I only changed what was really necessary to get 2.2 up. After 2 days the problem seems to be gone. I simply don't get more timeouts even with 800-900 requests/sec. Any ideas about what could cause this issue? Thanks!
Re: [users@httpd] Help troubleshooting performance issue, after 1000 total children Apache no longer responds to HTTP requests. Not MaxClients issue?
Hello, PJ. Perhaps your prefork settings are the cause of the issue. Look, you have 80 StartServers and 120 MaxSpareServers, and with such settings, apache can spawn 9600 (80*120) children. However, your ServerLimit and MaxClients (3500) are way to lower than that. I've had similar issues when the number of children apache could spawn were higher than the ServerLimit/MaxClients value. Try raising the ServerLimit and MaxClients value to 9600 (make sure you have enough memory to do so) and check what happens. In case you can't afford such high number of children, lower the value of StartServers and MaxSpareServers but keep it equivalent to MaxClients and ServerLimit. Hope this helps. Luis Alen On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:38 AM, P J pauljfli...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:26 AM, P J pauljfli...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:22 AM, P J pauljfli...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:37 AM, P J pauljfli...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Alexandr Normuradov norma...@gmail.com wrote: cat /proc/$(pidof -s httpd)/limitsTo troubleshoot that you should have at least two additional outputs from netstat -pant, with connections states and service httpd fullstatus, listing current state of all the apache procs/threads. What applications your Apache is serving? PHP? is it mod_php, mod_python, mod_perl? What the vhost access log file for the most accessed vhost is showing? Any pattern of slow, connections consuming attack? If it is, and all tasks are in the Keep Alive wait then disable Keep Alive and lower the general timeout to just 7 seconds. The error connect to listener on [::]:80 error is quite unusual. ETIMEDOUT Timeout while attempting connection. The server may be too busy to accept new connections. Note that for IP sockets the timeout may be very long when syncookies are enabled on the server. cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr cat /proc/$(pidof -s httpd)/limits Sincerely, Alexandr Normalex Hi Alexandr, thanks for taking a look at this with me. The traffic pattern for this website is at certain times of the day it receives huge spikes of traffic in very short periods of time, trying to tune Apache to accommodate it the best we can. cat /proc/$(pidof -s httpd)/limits Limit Soft Limit Hard Limit Units Max cpu time unlimitedunlimited seconds Max file size unlimitedunlimited bytes Max data size unlimitedunlimited bytes Max stack size10485760 unlimited bytes Max core file size0unlimited bytes Max resident set unlimitedunlimited bytes Max processes 5529655296 processes Max open files1024 1024 files Max locked memory 3276832768 bytes Max address space unlimitedunlimited bytes Max file locksunlimitedunlimited locks Max pending signals 5529655296 signals Max msgqueue size 819200 819200 bytes Max nice priority 00 Max realtime priority 00 cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr 15300 560543 Looking at Max open files I see what is likely the problem :) Max open files1024 I swear I modified this to 4096! I've changed the limit to 4096 now, I'll double check it tomorrow. Hopefully this will be the obvious fix! I will check service httpd fullstatus and netstat -pant tomorrow morning when this happens again, it happens the same time every day - it is not an attack, the customers application receives massive amounts of connections at certain times of the day. I've been working with Apache for 15 years and I've never seen connect to listener on [::]:80 error message before, I hope it's related to reaching Max open files. Thanks again for your help. -- PJ I was hoping this would be fixed now that Max Open files has been updated, same issue this morning. cat /proc/$(pidof -s httpd)/limits Limit Soft Limit Hard Limit Units Max cpu time unlimitedunlimited seconds Max file size unlimitedunlimited bytes Max data size unlimitedunlimited bytes Max stack size10485760 unlimited bytes Max core file size0unlimited bytes Max resident set unlimitedunlimited bytes Max processes 5529655296 processes Max open files1024 1024 files Max locked memory 3276832768 bytes Max address space unlimitedunlimited bytes Max file locksunlimitedunlimited locks Max
Re: [users@httpd] Help troubleshooting performance issue, after 1000 total children Apache no longer responds to HTTP requests. Not MaxClients issue?
Pete, Definitely. You're right. This is only valid for the MPM worker, not prefork. I was still sleeping when I jumped in this thread. Sorry guys. Luis Alen (31) 3239.4001 luis.a...@izap.com.br pedrogoncal...@izap.com.br iZap Tecnologia e Serviços http://izap.com.br On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Pete Houston p...@openstrike.co.uk wrote: On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:33:58AM -0300, Luis Fernando Alen wrote: Perhaps your prefork settings are the cause of the issue. Look, you have 80 StartServers and 120 MaxSpareServers, and with such settings, apache can spawn 9600 (80*120) children. That's not how prefork works. I think you are confusing prefork with a threaded MPM? Pete -- Openstrike - improving business through open source http://www.openstrike.co.uk/ or call 01722 770036 / 07092 020107
[users@httpd] Will wildcard vhost conflict with a specific one?
Hello, I need to set both a generic/wildcard vhost and a specific one with different DocumentRoot and configurations, just like the example below: *VirtualHost ** *ServerName specific.mydomain.com* * * *DocumentRoot /var/www/specific.mydomain.com/* *JkMount /otherapp serverX* *JkMount /otherapp/* serverX* */VirtualHost* * * *VirtualHost ** *ServerName wildcard.mydomain.com* *ServerAlias *.mydomain.com* * * *DocumentRoot /var/www/mydomain.com/* *JkMount /myapp serverY* *JkMount /myapp/* serverY* */VirtualHost* I strongly believe apache will be smart enough to make the wildcard vhost be the last match for its requests, but I'm not sure. Is there a chance this will conflict? Apache version is 2.2.3 and it's running on a CentOS 5.6 box.
[us...@httpd] AJP and 500/503 error
Hi guys. I'm experiencing an issue with Apache 2.2.11 on Solaris 10 with mod_proxy to communicate with a JBoss AS 4.2.3. When I try to reach the webpage hosted on JBoss trough Apache (in a reverse proxy configuration), I receive a 500, or sometimes 503 HTTP error. The Apache error log says: [Tue Jul 27 19:17:05 2010] [error] ajp_read_header: ajp_ilink_receive failed [Tue Jul 27 19:17:05 2010] [error] (120006)APR does not understand this error code: proxy: read response failed from 10.192.236.58:8009 (cr7260ux058) I've attached a Snoop Capture File (CAP), Wireshark readable, of this transaction. I can see a GET from Apache, after a keepalive, after a TCP FIN. I suspect of timeout. Can somebody confirm it? Someone already had this issue? My mod_proxy configuration is: Proxy balancer://http-wcm BalancerMember http://webloadbalancer.jboss.caixa:5510 keepalive=on /Proxy Att, Fernando Mercês Linux Registered User #432779 ajp_error.cap Description: Binary data - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [us...@httpd] questions regarding the version 2.2.15
I think is the correct version you are looking for. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/new_features_2_2.html On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Hélène Montarou hmonta...@yahoo.comwrote: Hi, I am looking for an HTTP proxy server with the following features: - It has to be a reverse proxy; - It has to support SSL certificates for encryption and a two-way authentication: it should received HTTPS requests and be able to decrypt them as well as encrypt them based on another SSL keys. The use case is as follow: - It receives HTTPS requests from a non-trusted zone and authenticates the remote party based on the server certificate he owns; - It forward requests to a zone that does not trust it and for which it owns a SLL client certificate. I was thinking of the Apache HTTP Server version 2.2.15. What do you think? Does this version include the modules mod_ssl and mod_proxy? Thanks and regards, Hélène __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
[us...@httpd] same rewrite for several vhosts on 404 errors
Hello guys. I use apache2 on debian and i have several vhosts in /etc/apache2/sites-available, included by /etc/apache/apache2.conf. Well, i need to redirect requests to all vhosts's non existing documents to a specific page. I already know the needed rule. What i need to know is where to put it, because i don't wanna configure it for each vhost. Is there a way to do it? Thanks for your help. Luís Fernando Alén Gonçalves. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [us...@httpd] same rewrite for several vhosts on 404 errors
André, I typed it wrong, sorry. Actually, i wanted to type sites-enable. And yes, i know all about the a2ensite and a2dissite commands and its interesting features. Well, maybe i can put it on an include. That's not a bad idea. But what i still want to avoid is repeating configuration on vhosts. André Warnier wrote: Luis Fernando wrote: Hello guys. I use apache2 on debian and i have several vhosts in /etc/apache2/sites-available, included by /etc/apache/apache2.conf. Not really : what is really included, are the files present in /etc/apache2/sites-enabled. These are symlinks to the files that are in /etc/apache2/sites-available, but you can have files in /etc/apache2/sites-available, which are not really used right now. Have a good look at the a2ensite command and what it does. That is one of the nicest things of the Apache2 configuration process in Debian. Well, i need to redirect requests to all vhosts's non existing documents to a specific page. I already know the needed rule. What i need to know is where to put it, because i don't wanna configure it for each vhost. Is there a way to do it? It would probably be cleaner if you repeated it in each VirtualHost. You can do this via an Include also, so it is only one configuration file. There is another way, but in my view it is more confusing and dangerous, because when you look at a VHost configuration, you will not see it, and forget that it happens : In the principle, anything which you put (or include) in the main configuration part, is inherited by all VirtualHosts, unless they redefine the same parameter themselves. When I say main configuration, it means everything that ultimately becomes part of the entire configuration, but is not between VirtualHost../VirtualHost tags. That includes apache2.conf, but also all files which are Include-d in it at startup time. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
[us...@httpd] AllowOverride for rewrite configurations only
Hello, I've been googling this issue and i couldn't find an answer yet. I read the documentation of AllowOverride directive but it didn't help too... I work on an ISP and we want to allow our customers to override only rewrite configurations via .htaccess files. Nowadays a lot of applications use friendly URLs and we're doing these rewrite configurations manually for each customer (and they're many)... So, if they were able to do it for themselfs, it would be easier to us. Today our AllowOverride configuration is set to None for security reasons.. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you. Luís Fernando Alén Gonçalves - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache load balance very uneven
André Warnier wrote: Hi. I know next to nothing about load balancing per se, so this will be a very naive question related to the data below : does it matter ? I mean, I can see that the load appears to be uneven, but the grand total seems to be about 10% of the available cpu time. I am only showing an example with a few users, but I can drive the load up to 100% CPU utilization. I expect the server to hold well in any case. At low user level I expect the load to be even, so I get the best possible response. So do you really care if one instance is using 4% and another 0.4% if there is still 90% available in total ? I am also wondering if what is shown down there is not just this phenomenon : whenever the load balancer has to decide to which back-end to pass a request, I suppose it checks first which ones are already busy. no, it should round-robin, no matter what is the current load in each od the app. servers. That is the algorithm I am using. Since in this case the total load is light and most of them are always free, it might just take the first of the list, which then ends up more used than the others. No ? André fernando castano wrote: Hi all, I'm new to apache. I am experiencing a problem with apache load balancer. I configured the load balancer across 10 app servers (glassfish domains), but when I see the way the cookies (and load) are distributed I see a very uneven distribution. Here is my proxy configuration: [EMAIL PROTECTED] more proxy_cluster.conf # configuration for clustering more then one glassfish ProxyPass / balancer://cluster/ stickysession=JSESSIONID nofailover=Off ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:8080 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:8280 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:8380 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:8480 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:8580 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:8780 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:8880 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:8980 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:9080 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:9180 Proxy balancer://cluster/ BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:8080 route=kenstgapp01_8080 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:8280 route=kenstgapp01_8280 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:8380 route=kenstgapp01_8380 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:8480 route=kenstgapp01_8480 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:8580 route=kenstgapp01_8580 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:8780 route=kenstgapp01_8780 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:8880 route=kenstgapp01_8880 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:8980 route=kenstgapp01_8980 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:9080 route=kenstgapp01_9080 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:9180 route=kenstgapp01_9180 loadfactor=1 /Proxy [EMAIL PROTECTED] And here is how the load gets distributed across jmeter 10 clients: as you can see, only 7 of the jvms get work, and among them the amount of work they do is very uneven (second to last entry in each row is % of cpu used by the process). These domains are exactly the same. I've checked the cookie distribution and reflects the load distribution (uneven). If I increase clients I eventually get work in all jvms (still uneven), and that just proves that all jvms can be routed thru apache load balancer. I am generating load with jmeter. Any hints of what am I doing wrong? how to fix it? PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP 1388 root 3338M 3257M sleep00 9:08:45 6.5% java/89 1414 root 3332M 3253M cpu2800 7:32:01 4.2% java/92 1417 root M 3253M cpu9 00 7:14:39 2.3% java/96 1424 root 3332M 3254M cpu1200 7:03:12 2.2% java/89 1420 root 3332M 3254M cpu6 00 7:35:40 2.1% java/89 1411 root M 3253M cpu2900 7:31:31 1.9% java/87 3461 webservd 40M 32M sleep00 0:00:03 0.3% httpd/1 3460 webservd 36M 26M sleep00 0:00:03 0.3% httpd/1 3462 webservd 36M 26M sleep00 0:00:03 0.3% httpd/1 3457 webservd 32M 27M cpu2400 0:00:02 0.3% httpd/1 1423 root M 3256M sleep00 7:00:01 0.2% java/88 3348 webservd 40M 32M sleep00 0:00:04 0.2% httpd/1 995 root 3536K 3072K sleep 100- 0:00:46 0.1% cpustat/33 1360 webservd 43M 35M sleep00 0:00:14 0.1% httpd/1 1337 webservd 43M 35M sleep00 0:00:13 0.1% httpd/1 3559 webservd 13M 11M cpu2000 0:00:00 0.1% hgwebdir.cgi/1 883 root 3848K 3832K cpu2500 0:00:13 0.1% prstat/1 1011 webservd 43M 36M sleep00 0:00:15 0.1% httpd/1 77 webservd 9016K 7832K sleep00 0:16:18 0.1% memcached/1 Total: 166 processes, 1525 lwps, load averages: 10.00, 10.20, 10.03 TIA, fdo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache load balance very uneven
Hi all, I'm new to apache. I am experiencing a problem with apache load balancer. I configured the load balancer across 10 app servers (glassfish domains), but when I see the way the cookies (and load) are distributed I see a very uneven distribution. Here is my proxy configuration: [EMAIL PROTECTED] more proxy_cluster.conf # configuration for clustering more then one glassfish ProxyPass / balancer://cluster/ stickysession=JSESSIONID nofailover=Off ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:8080 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:8280 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:8380 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:8480 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:8580 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:8780 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:8880 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:8980 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:9080 ProxyPassReverse / http://kenstgapp01:9180 Proxy balancer://cluster/ BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:8080 route=kenstgapp01_8080 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:8280 route=kenstgapp01_8280 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:8380 route=kenstgapp01_8380 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:8480 route=kenstgapp01_8480 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:8580 route=kenstgapp01_8580 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:8780 route=kenstgapp01_8780 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:8880 route=kenstgapp01_8880 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:8980 route=kenstgapp01_8980 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:9080 route=kenstgapp01_9080 loadfactor=1 BalancerMember http://kenstgapp01:9180 route=kenstgapp01_9180 loadfactor=1 /Proxy [EMAIL PROTECTED] And here is how the load gets distributed across jmeter 10 clients: as you can see, only 7 of the jvms get work, and among them the amount of work they do is very uneven (second to last entry in each row is % of cpu used by the process). These domains are exactly the same. I've checked the cookie distribution and reflects the load distribution (uneven). If I increase clients I eventually get work in all jvms (still uneven), and that just proves that all jvms can be routed thru apache load balancer. I am generating load with jmeter. Any hints of what am I doing wrong? how to fix it? PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP 1388 root 3338M 3257M sleep00 9:08:45 6.5% java/89 1414 root 3332M 3253M cpu2800 7:32:01 4.2% java/92 1417 root M 3253M cpu9 00 7:14:39 2.3% java/96 1424 root 3332M 3254M cpu1200 7:03:12 2.2% java/89 1420 root 3332M 3254M cpu6 00 7:35:40 2.1% java/89 1411 root M 3253M cpu2900 7:31:31 1.9% java/87 3461 webservd 40M 32M sleep00 0:00:03 0.3% httpd/1 3460 webservd 36M 26M sleep00 0:00:03 0.3% httpd/1 3462 webservd 36M 26M sleep00 0:00:03 0.3% httpd/1 3457 webservd 32M 27M cpu2400 0:00:02 0.3% httpd/1 1423 root M 3256M sleep00 7:00:01 0.2% java/88 3348 webservd 40M 32M sleep00 0:00:04 0.2% httpd/1 995 root 3536K 3072K sleep 100- 0:00:46 0.1% cpustat/33 1360 webservd 43M 35M sleep00 0:00:14 0.1% httpd/1 1337 webservd 43M 35M sleep00 0:00:13 0.1% httpd/1 3559 webservd 13M 11M cpu2000 0:00:00 0.1% hgwebdir.cgi/1 883 root 3848K 3832K cpu2500 0:00:13 0.1% prstat/1 1011 webservd 43M 36M sleep00 0:00:15 0.1% httpd/1 77 webservd 9016K 7832K sleep00 0:16:18 0.1% memcached/1 Total: 166 processes, 1525 lwps, load averages: 10.00, 10.20, 10.03 TIA, fdo - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] How to display the Allow Header for 405 Responses?
Hi all, Can you please let me know how could I display the Allow Header for 405 Responses? I need to dynamically set this in my C code. I have successfully managed to set the 405 status, and get it displayed to a client. But, however, setting r-allowed = (1 M_GET) or something similar doesn't display a Allow header. Can you please help me out? Thanks, Senaka - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache segfault with 2k Vhosts
Hi! I`m having a huge problem. I`m migrating apache 1.3 to 2.0. But I have 2k vhosts configured in single files (Include /x/*.conf) The problem is that apache is core dumping!!!I use a FreeBSD 6.1-Stable */dmesg:/* pid 1030 (httpd), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) /*httpd-error.log*/ [Thu Apr 26 11:25:45 2007] [debug] mod_so.c(248): loaded module php4_module [Thu Apr 26 12:00:11 2007] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authentication ... [Thu Apr 26 12:00:11 2007] [notice] Digest: done [Thu Apr 26 12:00:12 2007] [notice] Apache/2.0.59 (FreeBSD) DAV/2 PHP/4.4.4 with Suhosin-Patch configured -- resuming normal operations [Thu Apr 26 12:04:04 2007] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down I need a light to solve this problem. Thanks!!! *Fernando Schubert* SysAdmin San Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sysconfig.d/include.conf not generated
Hi, I'm going through the headaches (so many .conf files) of migrating from Apache 1.3 to 2.0 and when I run httpd2 it complains it can't find sysconfig.d/include.conf, which was supposed to be somehow generated. Why is this file missing?? Who is supposed to generate it? and how? What should be its contents? TIA, Fernando Apache Forums - Apache Web Server Help - sysconfig.dinclude.conf not generated.URL Description: Binary data Apache Forums - Apache Web Server Help - sysconfig.dinclude.conf not generated.URL Description: Binary data Apache Forums - Apache Web Server Help - sysconfig.dinclude.conf not generated.URL Description: Binary data Apache Forums - Apache Web Server Help - sysconfig.dinclude.conf not generated.URL Description: Binary data Apache Forums - Apache Web Server Help - sysconfig.dinclude.conf not generated.URL Description: Binary data Apache Forums - Apache Web Server Help - sysconfig.dinclude.conf not generated.URL Description: Binary data - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Server too slow
Hi there, My configuration is Apache/2.0.39, RH AS (2.4.19-4GB), Coldfusion Enterprise MX 6,1,0,63958 (flex too) e Java Version 1.4.2. My server is too slow and I my little confusion how to fix that. One thing is really strange... my apache log file. Look this: [Wed Sep 14 10:32:34 2005] [notice] child pid 30877 exit signal File size limit exceeded (25) [Wed Sep 14 10:32:34 2005] [notice] child pid 30871 exit signal File size limit exceeded (25) [Wed Sep 14 10:32:34 2005] [notice] child pid 30853 exit signal File size limit exceeded (25) [Wed Sep 14 10:32:34 2005] [notice] jrApache[init] added/activated proxy 127.0.0.1:51010 [Wed Sep 14 10:32:34 2005] [notice] jrApache[init] added/activated proxy 127.0.0.1:51010 [Wed Sep 14 10:32:34 2005] [notice] jrApache[init] added/activated proxy 127.0.0.1:51010 For each second, I have 20 or 30 messages like that. I just looked at google but I couldnt find anything. Any idea? Tks in advance! Fernando Barros - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[users@httpd] Estrange Redirection
I have installed the Apache httpd serve on my machine. When I try to access my page stored in httpd, it redirects to my modem! What can be happening? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
