Re: [users@httpd] [httpd2.4.57]Possible conflicts between VHosts with SSL and LimitRequestLine

2024-01-21 Thread Florent Thomas
Great thanks for your quick answer. 

If I understand well setting LimitRequestLine 10240 in name based virtualhost ? 
So what is your recommendation. 

Anyway, thanks for the time already spent on this. 

Regards 



Florent THOMAS 

☎ +33 972 457 755 
✉ [ mailto:florent.tho...@mind-and-go.com | florent.tho...@mind-and-go.com ] 


Mind & Go 
14, Rue Pierre Cartelet | 66000 PERPIGNAN [ https://mind-and-go.com/ |   ] [ 
https://www.facebook.com/Mind-And-Go-296462057466508/ ] [ 
https://twitter.com/MindAndGo |   ] [ 
https://www.linkedin.com/company/mind-and-go |   ] 


De: "Eric Covener"  
À: "users"  
Envoyé: Dimanche 21 Janvier 2024 14:48:03 
Objet: Re: [users@httpd] [httpd2.4.57]Possible conflicts between VHosts with 
SSL and LimitRequestLine 

The hostname, normally in the Host header, is not read until after the request 
line. So it cannot be effectively set in name based vhosts. 

The manual already warns about it 

On Sun, Jan 21, 2024, 9:26 AM Florent Thomas 
 wrote: 



Hi everyone, 

I'm running : 
Server version: Apache/2.4.57 (Debian) 
Server built: 2023-04-13T03:26:51 
Server's Module Magic Number: 20120211:127 
Server loaded: APR 1.7.2, APR-UTIL 1.6.3, PCRE 10.42 2022-12-11 
Compiled using: APR 1.7.2, APR-UTIL 1.6.3, PCRE 10.42 2022-12-11 
Architecture: 64-bit 
Server MPM: event 
threaded: yes (fixed thread count) 
forked: yes (variable process count) 
Server compiled with 
-D APR_HAS_SENDFILE 
-D APR_HAS_MMAP 
-D APR_HAVE_IPV6 (IPv4-mapped addresses enabled) 
-D APR_USE_PROC_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE 
-D APR_USE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE 
-D SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT 
-D APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD 
-D AP_HAVE_RELIABLE_PIPED_LOGS 
-D DYNAMIC_MODULE_LIMIT=256 
-D HTTPD_ROOT="/etc/apache2" 
-D SUEXEC_BIN="/usr/lib/apache2/suexec" 
-D DEFAULT_PIDLOG="/var/run/apache2.pid" 
-D DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD="logs/apache_runtime_status" 
-D DEFAULT_ERRORLOG="logs/error_log" 
-D AP_TYPES_CONFIG_FILE="mime.types" 
-D SERVER_CONFIG_FILE="apache2.conf" 

I've been struggling for almost 2 weeks on this weird issue. 
I have multiple vhosts working perfectly either in http and httpS with let's 
encrypt. 

Yet for one vhost we need to set limitrequestline to a higher value. I'm 
familiar with the procedure and I changed the value in the vhost. Sadly it 
didn't worked as expected. 
After searching in any place, enabling/disabling securities, modules etc... I 
found another conf conflicting with mine. 

The ssl.conf vhost placed in conf-enabled is causing troubles. However its 
content is not really complicated : 

LoadModule ssl_module /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_ssl.so 
Listen 443 
 
ServerName publicdomainname.tld 
SSLEngine on 
SSLCertificateFile "/etc/ssl/certs/apache-httpd.crt" 
SSLCertificateKeyFile "/etc/ssl/private/apache-httpd.key" 
 

My other vhost is as follows : 

 
ServerName otherdomain.tld 
.../... 
 
RequestHeader set X-Forwarded-Proto "https" 
 
.../ 
LimitRequestLine 10240 
.../... 
Include /etc/letsencrypt/options-ssl-apache.conf 
 

When both are enabled, the LimitRequestLine is not considered when reaching 
htps://otherdomain.tld . When I comment the Vhost in ssl.conf everything works 
fine. 

Is there any "permeability" between vhosts ? is there any precedence that could 
cause this vhost to be considered as the "master" of some options? Could anyone 
lead me to wha I am doing wrong? 

Sorry if I'm not clear, any question and/or feedback would be appreciated. 

Regards, 

Florent THOMAS 






[users@httpd] [httpd2.4.57]Possible conflicts between VHosts with SSL and LimitRequestLine

2024-01-21 Thread Florent Thomas
Hi everyone, 

I'm running : 
Server version: Apache/2.4.57 (Debian) 
Server built: 2023-04-13T03:26:51 
Server's Module Magic Number: 20120211:127 
Server loaded: APR 1.7.2, APR-UTIL 1.6.3, PCRE 10.42 2022-12-11 
Compiled using: APR 1.7.2, APR-UTIL 1.6.3, PCRE 10.42 2022-12-11 
Architecture: 64-bit 
Server MPM: event 
threaded: yes (fixed thread count) 
forked: yes (variable process count) 
Server compiled with 
-D APR_HAS_SENDFILE 
-D APR_HAS_MMAP 
-D APR_HAVE_IPV6 (IPv4-mapped addresses enabled) 
-D APR_USE_PROC_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE 
-D APR_USE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE 
-D SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT 
-D APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD 
-D AP_HAVE_RELIABLE_PIPED_LOGS 
-D DYNAMIC_MODULE_LIMIT=256 
-D HTTPD_ROOT="/etc/apache2" 
-D SUEXEC_BIN="/usr/lib/apache2/suexec" 
-D DEFAULT_PIDLOG="/var/run/apache2.pid" 
-D DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD="logs/apache_runtime_status" 
-D DEFAULT_ERRORLOG="logs/error_log" 
-D AP_TYPES_CONFIG_FILE="mime.types" 
-D SERVER_CONFIG_FILE="apache2.conf" 

I've been struggling for almost 2 weeks on this weird issue. 
I have multiple vhosts working perfectly either in http and httpS with let's 
encrypt. 

Yet for one vhost we need to set limitrequestline to a higher value. I'm 
familiar with the procedure and I changed the value in the vhost. Sadly it 
didn't worked as expected. 
After searching in any place, enabling/disabling securities, modules etc... I 
found another conf conflicting with mine. 

The ssl.conf vhost placed in conf-enabled is causing troubles. However its 
content is not really complicated : 

LoadModule ssl_module /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_ssl.so 
Listen 443 
 
ServerName publicdomainname.tld 
SSLEngine on 
SSLCertificateFile "/etc/ssl/certs/apache-httpd.crt" 
SSLCertificateKeyFile "/etc/ssl/private/apache-httpd.key" 
 

My other vhost is as follows : 

 
ServerName otherdomain.tld 
.../... 
 
RequestHeader set X-Forwarded-Proto "https" 
 
.../ 
LimitRequestLine 10240 
.../... 
Include /etc/letsencrypt/options-ssl-apache.conf 
 

When both are enabled, the LimitRequestLine is not considered when reaching 
htps://otherdomain.tld . When I comment the Vhost in ssl.conf everything works 
fine. 

Is there any "permeability" between vhosts ? is there any precedence that could 
cause this vhost to be considered as the "master" of some options? Could anyone 
lead me to wha I am doing wrong? 

Sorry if I'm not clear, any question and/or feedback would be appreciated. 

Regards, 

Florent THOMAS 


[users@httpd] proxying websocket and httpd in same VHOST

2023-06-03 Thread Florent Thomas
Hi everyone, 

I've browsed many ressources and read many thread of the mailing list. Looks 
like I'm not alone to have this issue and that documentation is not really 
clear.

So I'm running this release of apache : 
httpd -v
Server version: Apache/2.4.53 (Rocky Linux)
Server built:   Apr 28 2023 00:00:00

Here are the loaded modules :
core_module (static)
 so_module (static)
 http_module (static)
 access_compat_module (shared)
 actions_module (shared)
 alias_module (shared)
 allowmethods_module (shared)
 auth_basic_module (shared)
 auth_digest_module (shared)
 authn_anon_module (shared)
 authn_core_module (shared)
 authn_dbd_module (shared)
 authn_dbm_module (shared)
 authn_file_module (shared)
 authn_socache_module (shared)
 authz_core_module (shared)
 authz_dbd_module (shared)
 authz_dbm_module (shared)
 authz_groupfile_module (shared)
 authz_host_module (shared)
 authz_owner_module (shared)
 authz_user_module (shared)
 autoindex_module (shared)
 cache_module (shared)
 cache_disk_module (shared)
 cache_socache_module (shared)
 data_module (shared)
 dbd_module (shared)
 deflate_module (shared)
 dir_module (shared)
 dumpio_module (shared)
 echo_module (shared)
 env_module (shared)
 expires_module (shared)
 ext_filter_module (shared)
 filter_module (shared)
 headers_module (shared)
 include_module (shared)
 info_module (shared)
 log_config_module (shared)
 logio_module (shared)
 macro_module (shared)
 mime_magic_module (shared)
 mime_module (shared)
 negotiation_module (shared)
 remoteip_module (shared)
 reqtimeout_module (shared)
 request_module (shared)
 rewrite_module (shared)
 setenvif_module (shared)
 slotmem_plain_module (shared)
 slotmem_shm_module (shared)
 socache_dbm_module (shared)
 socache_memcache_module (shared)
 socache_redis_module (shared)
 socache_shmcb_module (shared)
 status_module (shared)
 substitute_module (shared)
 suexec_module (shared)
 unique_id_module (shared)
 unixd_module (shared)
 userdir_module (shared)
 version_module (shared)
 vhost_alias_module (shared)
 watchdog_module (shared)
 brotli_module (shared)
 dav_module (shared)
 dav_fs_module (shared)
 dav_lock_module (shared)
 lua_module (shared)
 mpm_event_module (shared)
 proxy_module (shared)
 lbmethod_bybusyness_module (shared)
 lbmethod_byrequests_module (shared)
 lbmethod_bytraffic_module (shared)
 lbmethod_heartbeat_module (shared)
 proxy_ajp_module (shared)
 proxy_balancer_module (shared)
 proxy_connect_module (shared)
 proxy_express_module (shared)
 proxy_fcgi_module (shared)
 proxy_fdpass_module (shared)
 proxy_ftp_module (shared)
 proxy_http_module (shared)
 proxy_hcheck_module (shared)
 proxy_scgi_module (shared)
 proxy_uwsgi_module (shared)
 systemd_module (shared)
 cgid_module (shared)

I'm deploying an apache RP in front of an Odoo provinding http classic on 8069 
port and websocket on :8072/websocket/ port

I read the example 
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/en/mod/mod_proxy.html#examples and 
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/en/mod/mod_proxy.html#wsupgrade  and I tried 
first this setup  :

   ProxyPreserveHost On
   ProxyRequests Off
   ProxyPass "/websocket/"  "http://127.0.0.1:8072/websocket/"; upgrade=websocket

   ProxyPass / http://127.0.0.1:8069/
   ProxyPassReverse / http://127.0.0.1:8069/

This fist try didn't succeed,so I tried this one 

   ProxyPreserveHost On
   ProxyRequests Off
   ProxyPass "/websocket/"  "ws://127.0.0.1:8072/websocket/"

   ProxyPass / http://127.0.0.1:8069/
   ProxyPassReverse / http://127.0.0.1:8069/

without more success

the backend still returning 400 on websocket url

any ideas , proposal, debug procedure will be appreciated.

Tanks in adavance for the time spent reading this thread.

regards


Florent THOMAS 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org