[EMAIL PROTECTED] windows binaries... yes, again
Somebody could post some links to download the binaries? Searching on the mailing list archive, I see the message above, but is a month ago... I suppose that there is now the files... http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-users/200512.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks begin:vcard fn;quoted-printable:Javier Mart=C3=ADnez Fern=C3=A1ndez n;quoted-printable:Mart=C3=ADnez Fern=C3=A1ndez;Javier org;quoted-printable:FABREGAS, S.A.;Inform=C3=A1tica adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:;;;Matar=C3=B3;Barcelona;;Espa=C3=B1a email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] windows binaries... yes, again
Javier MartÃnez wrote: Somebody could post some links to download the binaries? Searching on the mailing list archive, I see the message above, but is a month ago... I suppose that there is now the files... Yup - here's my 2c update... httpd 2.2.0 simply didn't build on win32, well, not without alot of patches. After the first, then the second, it was looking somewhat promising. By the time I was finished, the package had drifted pretty far from the source tarball. One thing the httpd project Part 2 - including ssl. This part the news is fairly solid. The one shortfall at the moment is I'm trying to figure out how to compile-in zlib.dll support into ssleay32.dll. Shouldn't take that long. Part 3 - new bugs. There are issues with partial results from proxy bodies amoung some other nits. The project dev team is working to agree on the right solution and will probably finish shortly. To pull the first and third part together, I offered to roll the 2.2.1 release over the last weekend, but the part three bug is still in the way. Hopefully if that's resolved in the next day or two, folks can put their hands on the win installer and tarball on Sunday for the purposes of verifing the package and approving the release. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] windows binaries... yes, again
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: httpd 2.2.0 simply didn't build on win32, well, not without alot of patches. After the first, then the second, it was looking somewhat promising. By the time I was finished, the package had drifted pretty far from the source tarball. One thing the httpd project ... (getting tired I guess) ... One thing the httpd project focuses on is the correctness of the source distribution. We only ship binaries based on the sources with very minor corrections to the build, and never really to the source code. If the source changes, a new -source- tarball is created first. Which is exactly what I'm trying to accomplish pushing out 2.2.1, very quickly, ahead of the Windows installer. Bill - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
