Re: [users@httpd] what's the minimum version of openssl required by 2.2.29?

2015-02-06 Thread Shane Witbeck
Daniel,

Thanks for the helpful reply.

After reading it I realized that I’m indeed compiling on a system that’s 
different than the runtime which led to my issue.

In my case, apache was compiled with latest CentOS with a newer openssl 
version. The runtime was an older version of CentOS with an older version of 
openssl. The RPM distribution (from which the compiled Apache came from) also 
didn’t specify the newer “Requires” version of openssl.



From: Daniel dferra...@gmail.commailto:dferra...@gmail.com
Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.orgmailto:users@httpd.apache.org 
users@httpd.apache.orgmailto:users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 1:17 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.orgmailto:users@httpd.apache.org 
users@httpd.apache.orgmailto:users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] what's the minimum version of openssl required by 
2.2.29?


2015-02-05 18:42 GMT+01:00 Shane Witbeck 
shane.witb...@jivesoftware.commailto:shane.witb...@jivesoftware.com:
I recently upgraded apache from 2.2.27 to 2.2.29 and received the
following error on startup:

/usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.10: no version information available

After some searching, I determined that openssl needed to be upgraded.

On CentOS 6.1 (yes, I know it¹s old):

The previous version was: OpenSSL 1.0.0-fips 29 Mar 2010

After upgrading via Œyum install openssl¹, the new version is: OpenSSL
1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013

This leads me to the question: What¹s the minimum version required by
Apache 2.2.29?



Thanks,
Shane


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.orgmailto:users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: 
users-h...@httpd.apache.orgmailto:users-h...@httpd.apache.org


Hello

none!

You don't specify if you upgraded through your distribution, or compiled 
manually, in any case httpd will depend on openssl libraries to which it was 
compiled, if none were specified it should be using the libraries present in 
the system when you ran ./configure.

If you upgraded with a distribution upgrade it is hard to believe dependencies 
are not met or there are library versions mismatches.

It looks to me as if you are installing different packages from different 
sources.

So I believe it is better if you focus on meeting your distribution 
dependencies, or if you compiled manually with an external openssl version to 
add the /path/to/openssl/lib to your libpath or in envvars so httpd will find 
the appropiate openssl libraries

--
Daniel Ferradal
IT Specialist

email dferra...@gmail.commailto:dferra...@gmail.com
linkedin 
es.linkedin.com/in/danielferradalhttp://es.linkedin.com/in/danielferradal


Re: [users@httpd] What's the meaning of the FilterProtocol Directive change=1:1

2013-01-24 Thread Nick Kew

On 24 Jan 2013, at 09:43, 金 戈 wrote:

 Hi, everyone!Sorry, I'm newbie in apache.

 FilterProtocol Directive
 This directs mod_filter to deal with ensuring the filter doesn't run when it 
 shouldn't, and that the HTTP response headers are correctly set taking 
 into account the effects of the filter.

FilterProtocol is rarely useful: modules usually declare the
protocol information internally.

Or, as in the case of mod_substitute, they may do it themselves.
mod_filter isn't removing content-length, but mod_substitute is!
Find the line
apr_table_unset(f-r-headers_out, Content-Length);
and remove it!

-- 
Nick Kew
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org



Re: [users@httpd] What's the meaning of the FilterProtocol Directive change=1:1

2013-01-24 Thread 金 戈
Thank's for your reply, Nick Kew. That's solve my problem!


在 2013-1-24,下午8:07,Nick Kew n...@webthing.com 写道:

 
 On 24 Jan 2013, at 09:43, 金 戈 wrote:
 
 Hi, everyone!Sorry, I'm newbie in apache.
 
 FilterProtocol Directive
 This directs mod_filter to deal with ensuring the filter doesn't run when it 
 shouldn't, and that the HTTP response headers are correctly set taking 
 into account the effects of the filter.
 
 FilterProtocol is rarely useful: modules usually declare the
 protocol information internally.
 
 Or, as in the case of mod_substitute, they may do it themselves.
 mod_filter isn't removing content-length, but mod_substitute is!
 Find the line
apr_table_unset(f-r-headers_out, Content-Length);
 and remove it!
 
 -- 
 Nick Kew
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org



Re: [users@httpd] What's the meaning?

2012-03-29 Thread Tom Evans
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Hua Li privatestu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi, I have an Apache httpd server working, and it generates something
 like the following from time to time:

 do_close:0, content_len:0.
 do_close:0, content_len:10.

 What's the meaning ? Thanks in advance.


Is this in the error log? Does the line start with a date in square
brackets, like this?

[Thu Mar 29 13:43:09 2012] [error]

If it doesn't, then the error does not come from apache, but it comes
from some component running within Apache, like a PHP script or a CGI
script.

Cheers

Tom

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org



Re: [users@httpd] What's the name of the http server on my Ubuntu: httpd or apache2?

2012-03-06 Thread Anam Ali Khan
I think it is not so important to call Apache web server as apache2 in any 
distribution.


The truth is that the proper name of Apache Web Server is httpd which is why 
Apache Software Foundation call by this name.


-Anam




 From: Mathijs mathijs...@gmail.com
To: users@httpd.apache.org 
Cc: julioser...@gmail.com 
Sent: Tuesday, 6 March 2012, 3:19
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] What's the name of the http server on my Ubuntu: 
httpd or apache2?
 

The Debian/Ubuntu distributions, or rather their Apache HTTPD package 
maintainers, have renamed the binary to apache2, amongst other modifications. 
This was mainly done to differentiate between Apache 1.x and Apache 2.x, but 
its use is mostly void nowadays.
Some other changes and layout peculiarities are listed 
here: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DebianDeb0rkification 


On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Julio Sergio julioser...@gmail.com wrote:

I'm very puzzled with this simple question: the name of the http server is httpd
or apache2?
This is because, all apache documentation, in http.apache.org, refers to it as
httpd, however in my Ubuntu installation it appears to be apache2.
Were not I someone that has some idea of this, I would be certainly lost.
I don't know who to blame for this: Apache, Ubuntu or both?

Do you have any comments?

Thanks,

-Sergio.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org




-- 
Gr,

Mathijs

Re: [users@httpd] What's the name of the http server on my Ubuntu: httpd or apache2?

2012-03-06 Thread Eric Covener
 The truth is that the proper name of Apache Web Server is httpd which is why
 Apache Software Foundation call by this name.

We also let anyone who builds it specify the name of the binary, so
it's not all that egregious.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org



Re: [users@httpd] What's the name of the http server on my Ubuntu: httpd or apache2?

2012-03-05 Thread Mathijs
The Debian/Ubuntu distributions, or rather their Apache HTTPD package
maintainers, have renamed the binary to apache2, amongst other
modifications. This was mainly done to differentiate between Apache 1.x and
Apache 2.x, but its use is mostly void nowadays.

Some other changes and layout peculiarities are listed here:
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DebianDeb0rkification

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Julio Sergio julioser...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm very puzzled with this simple question: the name of the http server is
 httpd
 or apache2?
 This is because, all apache documentation, in http.apache.org, refers to
 it as
 httpd, however in my Ubuntu installation it appears to be apache2.
 Were not I someone that has some idea of this, I would be certainly lost.
 I don't know who to blame for this: Apache, Ubuntu or both?

 Do you have any comments?

 Thanks,

 -Sergio.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org




-- 
Gr,

Mathijs


Re: [users@httpd] What's the name of the http server on my Ubuntu: httpd or apache2?

2012-03-05 Thread Noel Butler
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 23:19 +0100, Mathijs wrote:
 The Debian/Ubuntu distributions, or rather their Apache HTTPD package
 maintainers, have renamed the binary to apache2, amongst other
 modifications. This was mainly done to differentiate between Apache
 1.x and Apache 2.x, but its use is mostly void nowadays.
 


Yes and I have long believed they need to be called to task on this.
The Web Server software httpd,  hence why the source code released in
httpd-x.xx.xx.  Apache is the Foundation name and is not the project
name, in their way of thinking, are they are going to call OpenOffice
apache3.4 when its released in coming months






signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part