Re: Using Kannel in a ISP environment
Aarno Syvänen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there any way of easily making Kannel less strict? Obviously we > > want to try and reduce the number of calls to our helpdesk as much as > > possible. > > > > What kind of WML pages cause problems? Perhaps it is indeed possible to > add compability flags, though Lars used to have strong opinions about this > subject. > I've found a few where they use unquoted "&"s in the source, instead of "&". Stuff like that mostly... I realise that this is illegal WML of course, but the more I can do to help our helpdesk bobs the better really... Scott -- sjr systems and software engineer demon internet, thus plc
Re: Using Kannel in a ISP environment
Scott James Remnant wrote: > Hi there, > > We're a fairly large ISP in the UK and are considering replacing our > existing WAP gateway (currently running on Nokia's NAMP) with a Kannel > gateway. > > Just wanted to know whether there's any "gotcha"s that we might trip over > or any issues that we may come across that people are currently aware of. > > I've got it working on a Solaris 8 box, and have had only a few problems > so far (most of which seem to be more problems with the upstream WML > page). > > Is there any way of easily making Kannel less strict? Obviously we want > to try and reduce the number of calls to our helpdesk as much as possible. > > Scott > -- > sjr systems and software engineer > demon internet, thus plc What kind of WML pages cause problems? Perhaps it is indeed possible to add compability flags, though Lars used to have strong opinions about this subject. Aarno
