Re: [389-users] Busy replica when deleting replication conflict

2010-03-08 Thread Juan Asensio Sánchez
OK; opened: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571677

2010/3/9 Rich Megginson 

> Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:
> > One note, we have servers with version 1.1.3 and servers that have
> > been upgraded to version 1.2.5. Only the servers that have been
> > upgraded to 1.2.5 are showing the busy replica error, not those with
> > version 1.1.3. Hope this could help.
> Please file a bug.  Does this happen every time you attempt to delete a
> replication conflict entry?  Does it happen with any other sort of
> entry?  This began happening with 1.2.5?
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >
> > El 8 de marzo de 2010 16:50, Juan Asensio Sánchez  > > escribió:
> >
> > These are the messages when enabling replication logs:
> >
> > [08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525
> > op=11 repl="o=X,dc=X,dc=X": Replica in use
> > locking_purl=conn=207283 id=3
> > [08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525
> > op=11 replica="o=X,dc=X,dc=X": Unable to acquire
> > replica: error: replica busy locked by conn=207283 id=3 for
> > incremental update
> > [08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525
> > op=11 repl="o=X,dc=X,dc=X":
> > StartNSDS50ReplicationRequest: response=1 rc=0
> > [08/Mar/2010:16:02:54 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525
> > op=13 repl="o=X,dc=X,dc=X": Begin incremental protocol
> >
> > These are all the messages in the access.log referring the
> > connection conn=207283
> >
> > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 fd=607 slot=607 SSL
> > connection from XX to XX
> > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 SSL 256-bit AES
> > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=0 BIND
> > dn="cn=Replication Manager,cn=config" method=128 version=3
> > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97
> > nentries=0 etime=0 dn="cn=replication manager,cn=config"
> > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=1 SRCH base="" scope=0
> > filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension"
> > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101
> > nentries=1 etime=0
> > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=2 SRCH base="" scope=0
> > filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension"
> > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=101
> > nentries=1 etime=0
> > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=3 EXT
> > oid="2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.3" name="Netscape Replication Start
> > Session"
> > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=120
> > nentries=0 etime=0
> > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=4 DEL
> >
> dn="nsuniqueid=f851c101-1dd111b2-a64db547-e406+uid=cabudenhos029p$,ou=computers,o=XX,dc=XX,dc=XX"
> >
> > And no more... As you can see, the replica is busy since 8:16 (now
> > is 16:51, in Spain). I am locked :S.
> >
> >
> > El 8 de marzo de 2010 16:44, Juan Asensio Sánchez
> > mailto:oke...@gmail.com>> escribió:
> >
> > At first sight, there are no messages neither in access or
> > error logs, in supplier or consumers. Last modification
> > operation in the busy replica/database is:
> >
> > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=4 DEL
> >
> dn="nsuniqueid=f851c101-1dd111b2-a64db547-e406+uid=cabudenhos029p$,ou=computers,o=XX,dc=XX,dc=XXX"
> >
> > which does not get any RESULT operation. I have just enabled
> > replication logs in the consumer to see any messages. As soon
> > i get them, i will post.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >
> > 2010/3/8 Rich Megginson  > >
> >
> > Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > I have posted this on the chat, but i am not sure if it
> > is wirking
> > > fine in my computer. I am using 389ds 1.2.5, and i have
> > found some
> > > replication conflicts (nsds5replicaconflict=*). I have
> > deleted them
> > > manually, and now the databases in the other servers are
> > busy all the
> > > time, no matter if i restart the service in the source
> > or target
> > > servers (i must kill the target servers as they never
> > stop), when the
> > > replication agreement is launched again from the source
> > server, the
> > > replica is busy all the time. the last operation in the
> > access log of
> > > the replicated servers is the deletion of the object in
> > conflict,
> > > which never gets a result.
> > Any thing in the errors log of the suppliers or the
>

Re: webcam for linux

2010-03-08 Thread Jatin K
On 03/09/2010 01:10 PM, William John Murray wrote:
>
>>> hi all,
>>>
>>> i am using fedora 12 ... in my dell laptop. i want to enable my
>>> web cam ...
>>>
>> just get cheese (webcam software for linux )
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> yum install cheese
>>
>>  
>I am not sure that will work. It depends upon what application you
> use. In Fedora 11 my Dell integrated cam 'just worked'; in F12 the 'evo'
> web conference tool doesn't seem to recognise it - I get an error about
> 'no openGL found'
> If you have problems, and can find a 'live' F11 to check with, it
> might be worth testing.
>  Bill
>
>
I'm using Dell Vostro 1520 with integrated Web-Cam  cheese works for 
me ( I'm using Fedora 12 x86_64 ,  uname -r = 2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64 )

Regards

-- 
   °v°
  /(_)\
   ^ ^  Jatin Khatri
Registerd Linux user No #501175
www.counter.li.org
No M$

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: webcam for linux

2010-03-08 Thread William John Murray

> > hi all,
> >
> > i am using fedora 12 ... in my dell laptop. i want to enable my 
> > web cam ...
> just get cheese (webcam software for linux )
> 
> 
> 
> 
> yum install cheese
> 
  I am not sure that will work. It depends upon what application you
use. In Fedora 11 my Dell integrated cam 'just worked'; in F12 the 'evo'
web conference tool doesn't seem to recognise it - I get an error about
'no openGL found'
   If you have problems, and can find a 'live' F11 to check with, it
might be worth testing.
Bill

-- 
Bill Murray    ATLAS
STFC RAL at: Bat 161 1-14, CERN, 1211 Meyrin, Geneve 23, Switzerland  
 Tel:- CERN +41 22 7673028or  RAL +44 (0)1235 446256
-- 
Scanned by iCritical.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: ssh to my computer behind NAT

2010-03-08 Thread Chris Kloiber
Oh.  Well forgive me for suggesting a non-open source product, but look 
into Dropbox:


http://www.dropbox.com/

With this, you copy items into the Dropbox on your system, and it's 
almost instantly accessible both from any other machine you install 
Dropbox on, or from the https://www.dropbox.com website. Free (as in 
beer) for up to 2 Gigs space.


Not as good as getting into your system remotely, but oh well.

--
Chris Kloiber


On 03/09/2010 01:41 AM, Hiisi wrote:

2010/3/9 Rick Sewill:

On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 00:08 -0600, Rick Sewill wrote:

On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 08:40 +0300, Hiisi wrote:

2010/3/9 Rick Sewill:

<--SNIP-->

Hiisi.
Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: http://counter.li.org/
--
Spandex is a privilege, not a right.


Your explanation of a middle host is good.
I didn't understand what you were doing, previously.

Your description of NAT is fine. �Your ISP is doing NAT.

My first thought is to say, talk to the ISP.
The ISP should have a way for you to configure their NAT router
to forward the ssh port to your host.

I have difficulty thinking why the ISP wouldn't let you configure
their NAT router to forward the ssh port to your host...unless.

I hadn't thought of it before, but putting customers behind a NAT
router, and not letting customers configure the NAT router to
forward ports, might be a way to prevent customers running servers.

Is this what the ISP is trying to do? �Stop customers running servers?





If a customer wants to run a server, even an ssh server,
which is what you wish to do, does the ISP wish to charge more money?


*YES*



If the ISP is deliberately stopping you, I'd say get another ISP.
If you can't get another ISP, I don't know what to suggest.



I just thought of another possibility the ISP might be doing.

Are you, and some other customers of the ISP, sharing the same public
IP address? �Doing so would reduce the number of public IP addresses
the ISP would need. �I'd be very, very surprised if an ISP did this.
I'd be more than surprised. �I'd be shocked.




Take a deep breath! Yes, we're!!!
I live in a students hostel and I'm unable to change ISP. The only
other solution would be to to get a gprs-modem. But I don't want to
bay it because prices are wild here in Moscow (and I'd have dynamic IP
then, correct?). Before writing on this list I've consulted my ISP.
They have no better (free) solution that the one I have at the moment.
Alternatively, they can charge me with extra money for so called
'static IP'. I don't need it because I don't want to run WEB-server at
home. I just want to access my files at home computer from lab
computer to eliminate stresses in case I forgot a USB-drive in a rash
to the lab :-)




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: webcam for linux

2010-03-08 Thread Jatin K
On 03/09/2010 12:08 PM, • » ѕαтнιѕн я « • wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i am using fedora 12 ... in my dell laptop. i want to enable my 
> web cam ...
just get cheese (webcam software for linux )




yum install cheese

-- 
   °v°
  /(_)\
   ^ ^  Jatin Khatri
Registerd Linux user No #501175
www.counter.li.org
No M$

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: ssh to my computer behind NAT

2010-03-08 Thread Joerg Bergmann
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 00:17 -0600 schrieb Rick Sewill:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 00:08 -0600, Rick Sewill wrote: 
> > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 08:40 +0300, Hiisi wrote: 
> > > 2010/3/9 Rick Sewill :
> > > > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 00:49 +0300, Hiisi wrote:
> > > >> Dear list!
> > > >> I would like to be able to ssh to my home computer located behind my
> > > >> ISP' NAT. I know, I can tunnel to it through some middle host and
> > > >> actually I'm doing it at the moment. But I'm fancy is there a better
> > > >> solution? Is there a possibility of not using any computer at the
> > > <--SNIP-->
> > > >
> > > > If it's a company gateway, we mustn't help you defeat their security.
> > > >
> > > > I don't want to discuss whether having a gateway adds to security.
> > > > Personally, I believe all devices in the internal LAN must be secure.
> > > > I do not believe security can be done solely at the border of a LAN.
> > > >
> > > > Do you control the device that is doing NAT for you or does the ISP?
> > > > If controlled by the ISP, did the ISP provide a way to configure it?
> > > >
> > > > As others have said and will say, one needs to have the NAT device
> > > > port forward the appropriate port (whatever port you use for ssh)
> > > > to your host.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > > You and other, thank for your responses. Sorry I didn't make it clear.
> > > I don't have any router. I'm connected to Internet via LAN. My IP
> > > address is something like 192.168.3.20 and I use ISP' router IP
> > > (192.168.0.1) as a gateway (I don't have any access to the router).
> > > So, I decided its called NAT. Am I wrong here? I don't know. I know
> > > only that I can't reach my computer from the outside of the LAN. So, I
> > > did the following: on the target computer I ran:
> > > ssh -R 10002:localhost:22 u...@middle.host (it's a computer somewhere
> > > and I have ssh access there)
> > > Now I can connect to the target computer in a few steps:
> > > 1. connect to middle.host:
> > > ssh u...@middle.host
> > > 2. and from there:
> > > ssh hi...@home.computer -p 10002
> > > See, it's not very convenient and I'm not sure whether it's possible
> > > to use VNC using this setup (as I would like to).  So, is there any
> > > better solution?
> > > -- 
> > > Hiisi.
> > > Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: http://counter.li.org/
> > > --
> > > Spandex is a privilege, not a right.
> > 
> > Your explanation of a middle host is good.  
> > I didn't understand what you were doing, previously.
> > 
> > Your description of NAT is fine.  Your ISP is doing NAT.
> > 
> > My first thought is to say, talk to the ISP.
> > The ISP should have a way for you to configure their NAT router
> > to forward the ssh port to your host.
> > 
> > I have difficulty thinking why the ISP wouldn't let you configure
> > their NAT router to forward the ssh port to your host...unless.
> > 
> > I hadn't thought of it before, but putting customers behind a NAT
> > router, and not letting customers configure the NAT router to 
> > forward ports, might be a way to prevent customers running servers.
> > 
> > Is this what the ISP is trying to do?  Stop customers running servers?
> > 
> > If a customer wants to run a server, even an ssh server,
> > which is what you wish to do, does the ISP wish to charge more money?
> > 
> > If the ISP is deliberately stopping you, I'd say get another ISP.
> > If you can't get another ISP, I don't know what to suggest.
> > 
> 
> I just thought of another possibility the ISP might be doing.
> 
> Are you, and some other customers of the ISP, sharing the same public
> IP address?  Doing so would reduce the number of public IP addresses
> the ISP would need.  I'd be very, very surprised if an ISP did this.
> I'd be more than surprised.  I'd be shocked.
> 
> 
> 
It's usual for ISP to do so, at least outside U.S.A. Public IP4 
addresses are scarce even in Germany: German Telekom provides a public
IP to my DSL router, O2 provides an non-routable  10.x.x.x address to 
my 3G device. The only solution will be IPv6. I hope it will come soon.

Joerg

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: ssh to my computer behind NAT

2010-03-08 Thread Hiisi
2010/3/9 Rick Sewill :
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 00:08 -0600, Rick Sewill wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 08:40 +0300, Hiisi wrote:
>> > 2010/3/9 Rick Sewill :
<--SNIP-->
>> > Hiisi.
>> > Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: http://counter.li.org/
>> > --
>> > Spandex is a privilege, not a right.
>>
>> Your explanation of a middle host is good.
>> I didn't understand what you were doing, previously.
>>
>> Your description of NAT is fine.  Your ISP is doing NAT.
>>
>> My first thought is to say, talk to the ISP.
>> The ISP should have a way for you to configure their NAT router
>> to forward the ssh port to your host.
>>
>> I have difficulty thinking why the ISP wouldn't let you configure
>> their NAT router to forward the ssh port to your host...unless.
>>
>> I hadn't thought of it before, but putting customers behind a NAT
>> router, and not letting customers configure the NAT router to
>> forward ports, might be a way to prevent customers running servers.
>>
>> Is this what the ISP is trying to do?  Stop customers running servers?
>>


>> If a customer wants to run a server, even an ssh server,
>> which is what you wish to do, does the ISP wish to charge more money?

*YES*

>>
>> If the ISP is deliberately stopping you, I'd say get another ISP.
>> If you can't get another ISP, I don't know what to suggest.
>>
>
> I just thought of another possibility the ISP might be doing.
>
> Are you, and some other customers of the ISP, sharing the same public
> IP address?  Doing so would reduce the number of public IP addresses
> the ISP would need.  I'd be very, very surprised if an ISP did this.
> I'd be more than surprised.  I'd be shocked.
>
>

Take a deep breath! Yes, we're!!!
I live in a students hostel and I'm unable to change ISP. The only
other solution would be to to get a gprs-modem. But I don't want to
bay it because prices are wild here in Moscow (and I'd have dynamic IP
then, correct?). Before writing on this list I've consulted my ISP.
They have no better (free) solution that the one I have at the moment.
Alternatively, they can charge me with extra money for so called
'static IP'. I don't need it because I don't want to run WEB-server at
home. I just want to access my files at home computer from lab
computer to eliminate stresses in case I forgot a USB-drive in a rash
to the lab :-)
-- 
Hiisi.
Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: http://counter.li.org/
--
Spandex is a privilege, not a right.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Firewall config and ftp server

2010-03-08 Thread NoSpaze
Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 22:45 +0800 schrieb Edward. S. P. Leong:
> Our is fedora 11...

Mine is F12.

> How can we enable the following of firewall function ( modules ), then
> the ftp server is good for working ?
> modprobe ip_tables

# lsmod|grep tables
ip6_tables  9409  1 ip6table_filter

# modprobe ip_tables
FATAL: Module ip_tables not found.

# lsmod|grep ip
ip6t_REJECT 3394  2 
nf_conntrack_ipv6  14859  2 
ip6table_filter 2227  1 
ip6_tables  9409  1 ip6table_filter
ipv6  223738  22 ip6t_REJECT,nf_conntrack_ipv6
dm_multipath   12324  0 

therefore, there's no such module, suppose I.

> modprobe ip_nat_ftp
> modprobe ip_conntrack
> modprobe ip_conntrack_ftp

# modprobe ip_nat_ftp
# modprobe ip_conntrack
FATAL: Module ip_conntrack not found.
# modprobe ip_conntrack_ftp

You do not show the output of this three commands, this is mine.

Matches your setup?
--
Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo - nosp...@gmail.com
otbits.blogspot.com / counter.li.org: #367962
--
Apr 13 11:05:20 apollo13 fsck[3927]: root, we have a problem.
-- Jeff Gostin


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


webcam for linux

2010-03-08 Thread • » ѕαтнιѕн я « •
hi all,

   i am using  fedora 12 ... in my dell laptop. i want to enable my web
cam ...
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Problem with an external usb HD - slow usb

2010-03-08 Thread Don Quixote de la Mancha
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Paolo Galtieri  wrote:
> The drives are on different busses. One drive is plugged into a hub the
> other directly into the laptop.

It is possible that the USB port on your computer is USB 2.0 (Full
Speed) but that the hub is just USB 1.1 (High Speed).

USB Mass Storage does work under the 1.1 protocol, but it is so slow
as to be useless for all but very small files, as you have no doubt
observed.

I would suggest asking your friends to let you plug your drive into
their hubs attached to their computers.  If you can find a combination
of hub and computer that operates at an acceptable speed, ask your
friend to let you borrow their hub long enough to try it out on your
own computer.

Put your friend's hub where your own hub is now.  If you then find
that your drive starts working really fast, your next step is to drop
your old hub off at the nearest eWaste recycling center and to buy a
new hub.  They're not expensive, but check the product packaging to
make sure it specifically says USB 2.0 or USB2.

Don Quixote
-- 
Don Quixote de la Mancha
quix...@dulcineatech.com
http://www.dulcineatech.com

   Dulcinea Technologies Corporation: Software of Elegance and Beauty.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: ssh to my computer behind NAT

2010-03-08 Thread Rick Sewill
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 00:08 -0600, Rick Sewill wrote: 
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 08:40 +0300, Hiisi wrote: 
> > 2010/3/9 Rick Sewill :
> > > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 00:49 +0300, Hiisi wrote:
> > >> Dear list!
> > >> I would like to be able to ssh to my home computer located behind my
> > >> ISP' NAT. I know, I can tunnel to it through some middle host and
> > >> actually I'm doing it at the moment. But I'm fancy is there a better
> > >> solution? Is there a possibility of not using any computer at the
> > <--SNIP-->
> > >
> > > If it's a company gateway, we mustn't help you defeat their security.
> > >
> > > I don't want to discuss whether having a gateway adds to security.
> > > Personally, I believe all devices in the internal LAN must be secure.
> > > I do not believe security can be done solely at the border of a LAN.
> > >
> > > Do you control the device that is doing NAT for you or does the ISP?
> > > If controlled by the ISP, did the ISP provide a way to configure it?
> > >
> > > As others have said and will say, one needs to have the NAT device
> > > port forward the appropriate port (whatever port you use for ssh)
> > > to your host.
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > You and other, thank for your responses. Sorry I didn't make it clear.
> > I don't have any router. I'm connected to Internet via LAN. My IP
> > address is something like 192.168.3.20 and I use ISP' router IP
> > (192.168.0.1) as a gateway (I don't have any access to the router).
> > So, I decided its called NAT. Am I wrong here? I don't know. I know
> > only that I can't reach my computer from the outside of the LAN. So, I
> > did the following: on the target computer I ran:
> > ssh -R 10002:localhost:22 u...@middle.host (it's a computer somewhere
> > and I have ssh access there)
> > Now I can connect to the target computer in a few steps:
> > 1. connect to middle.host:
> > ssh u...@middle.host
> > 2. and from there:
> > ssh hi...@home.computer -p 10002
> > See, it's not very convenient and I'm not sure whether it's possible
> > to use VNC using this setup (as I would like to).  So, is there any
> > better solution?
> > -- 
> > Hiisi.
> > Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: http://counter.li.org/
> > --
> > Spandex is a privilege, not a right.
> 
> Your explanation of a middle host is good.  
> I didn't understand what you were doing, previously.
> 
> Your description of NAT is fine.  Your ISP is doing NAT.
> 
> My first thought is to say, talk to the ISP.
> The ISP should have a way for you to configure their NAT router
> to forward the ssh port to your host.
> 
> I have difficulty thinking why the ISP wouldn't let you configure
> their NAT router to forward the ssh port to your host...unless.
> 
> I hadn't thought of it before, but putting customers behind a NAT
> router, and not letting customers configure the NAT router to 
> forward ports, might be a way to prevent customers running servers.
> 
> Is this what the ISP is trying to do?  Stop customers running servers?
> 
> If a customer wants to run a server, even an ssh server,
> which is what you wish to do, does the ISP wish to charge more money?
> 
> If the ISP is deliberately stopping you, I'd say get another ISP.
> If you can't get another ISP, I don't know what to suggest.
> 

I just thought of another possibility the ISP might be doing.

Are you, and some other customers of the ISP, sharing the same public
IP address?  Doing so would reduce the number of public IP addresses
the ISP would need.  I'd be very, very surprised if an ISP did this.
I'd be more than surprised.  I'd be shocked.



-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: ssh to my computer behind NAT

2010-03-08 Thread Chris Kloiber
If that's true (they want to prevent you from running a server) then get 
a new ISP.


--
Chris Kloiber


On 03/09/2010 01:08 AM, Rick Sewill wrote:

On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 08:40 +0300, Hiisi wrote:

2010/3/9 Rick Sewill:

On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 00:49 +0300, Hiisi wrote:

Dear list!
I would like to be able to ssh to my home computer located behind my
ISP' NAT. I know, I can tunnel to it through some middle host and
actually I'm doing it at the moment. But I'm fancy is there a better
solution? Is there a possibility of not using any computer at the

<--SNIP-->


If it's a company gateway, we mustn't help you defeat their security.

I don't want to discuss whether having a gateway adds to security.
Personally, I believe all devices in the internal LAN must be secure.
I do not believe security can be done solely at the border of a LAN.

Do you control the device that is doing NAT for you or does the ISP?
If controlled by the ISP, did the ISP provide a way to configure it?

As others have said and will say, one needs to have the NAT device
port forward the appropriate port (whatever port you use for ssh)
to your host.




You and other, thank for your responses. Sorry I didn't make it clear.
I don't have any router. I'm connected to Internet via LAN. My IP
address is something like 192.168.3.20 and I use ISP' router IP
(192.168.0.1) as a gateway (I don't have any access to the router).
So, I decided its called NAT. Am I wrong here? I don't know. I know
only that I can't reach my computer from the outside of the LAN. So, I
did the following: on the target computer I ran:
ssh -R 10002:localhost:22 u...@middle.host (it's a computer somewhere
and I have ssh access there)
Now I can connect to the target computer in a few steps:
1. connect to middle.host:
ssh u...@middle.host
2. and from there:
ssh hi...@home.computer -p 10002
See, it's not very convenient and I'm not sure whether it's possible
to use VNC using this setup (as I would like to).  So, is there any
better solution?
--
Hiisi.
Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: http://counter.li.org/
--
Spandex is a privilege, not a right.


Your explanation of a middle host is good.
I didn't understand what you were doing, previously.

Your description of NAT is fine.  Your ISP is doing NAT.

My first thought is to say, talk to the ISP.
The ISP should have a way for you to configure their NAT router
to forward the ssh port to your host.

I have difficulty thinking why the ISP wouldn't let you configure
their NAT router to forward the ssh port to your host...unless.

I hadn't thought of it before, but putting customers behind a NAT
router, and not letting customers configure the NAT router to
forward ports, might be a way to prevent customers running servers.

Is this what the ISP is trying to do?  Stop customers running servers?

If a customer wants to run a server, even an ssh server,
which is what you wish to do, does the ISP wish to charge more money?

If the ISP is deliberately stopping you, I'd say get another ISP.
If you can't get another ISP, I don't know what to suggest.






smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: ssh to my computer behind NAT

2010-03-08 Thread Rick Sewill
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 08:40 +0300, Hiisi wrote: 
> 2010/3/9 Rick Sewill :
> > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 00:49 +0300, Hiisi wrote:
> >> Dear list!
> >> I would like to be able to ssh to my home computer located behind my
> >> ISP' NAT. I know, I can tunnel to it through some middle host and
> >> actually I'm doing it at the moment. But I'm fancy is there a better
> >> solution? Is there a possibility of not using any computer at the
> <--SNIP-->
> >
> > If it's a company gateway, we mustn't help you defeat their security.
> >
> > I don't want to discuss whether having a gateway adds to security.
> > Personally, I believe all devices in the internal LAN must be secure.
> > I do not believe security can be done solely at the border of a LAN.
> >
> > Do you control the device that is doing NAT for you or does the ISP?
> > If controlled by the ISP, did the ISP provide a way to configure it?
> >
> > As others have said and will say, one needs to have the NAT device
> > port forward the appropriate port (whatever port you use for ssh)
> > to your host.
> >
> >
> 
> You and other, thank for your responses. Sorry I didn't make it clear.
> I don't have any router. I'm connected to Internet via LAN. My IP
> address is something like 192.168.3.20 and I use ISP' router IP
> (192.168.0.1) as a gateway (I don't have any access to the router).
> So, I decided its called NAT. Am I wrong here? I don't know. I know
> only that I can't reach my computer from the outside of the LAN. So, I
> did the following: on the target computer I ran:
> ssh -R 10002:localhost:22 u...@middle.host (it's a computer somewhere
> and I have ssh access there)
> Now I can connect to the target computer in a few steps:
> 1. connect to middle.host:
> ssh u...@middle.host
> 2. and from there:
> ssh hi...@home.computer -p 10002
> See, it's not very convenient and I'm not sure whether it's possible
> to use VNC using this setup (as I would like to).  So, is there any
> better solution?
> -- 
> Hiisi.
> Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: http://counter.li.org/
> --
> Spandex is a privilege, not a right.

Your explanation of a middle host is good.  
I didn't understand what you were doing, previously.

Your description of NAT is fine.  Your ISP is doing NAT.

My first thought is to say, talk to the ISP.
The ISP should have a way for you to configure their NAT router
to forward the ssh port to your host.

I have difficulty thinking why the ISP wouldn't let you configure
their NAT router to forward the ssh port to your host...unless.

I hadn't thought of it before, but putting customers behind a NAT
router, and not letting customers configure the NAT router to 
forward ports, might be a way to prevent customers running servers.

Is this what the ISP is trying to do?  Stop customers running servers?

If a customer wants to run a server, even an ssh server,
which is what you wish to do, does the ISP wish to charge more money?

If the ISP is deliberately stopping you, I'd say get another ISP.
If you can't get another ISP, I don't know what to suggest.


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: ssh to my computer behind NAT

2010-03-08 Thread Hiisi
2010/3/9 Rick Sewill :
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 00:49 +0300, Hiisi wrote:
>> Dear list!
>> I would like to be able to ssh to my home computer located behind my
>> ISP' NAT. I know, I can tunnel to it through some middle host and
>> actually I'm doing it at the moment. But I'm fancy is there a better
>> solution? Is there a possibility of not using any computer at the
<--SNIP-->
>
> If it's a company gateway, we mustn't help you defeat their security.
>
> I don't want to discuss whether having a gateway adds to security.
> Personally, I believe all devices in the internal LAN must be secure.
> I do not believe security can be done solely at the border of a LAN.
>
> Do you control the device that is doing NAT for you or does the ISP?
> If controlled by the ISP, did the ISP provide a way to configure it?
>
> As others have said and will say, one needs to have the NAT device
> port forward the appropriate port (whatever port you use for ssh)
> to your host.
>
>

You and other, thank for your responses. Sorry I didn't make it clear.
I don't have any router. I'm connected to Internet via LAN. My IP
address is something like 192.168.3.20 and I use ISP' router IP
(192.168.0.1) as a gateway (I don't have any access to the router).
So, I decided its called NAT. Am I wrong here? I don't know. I know
only that I can't reach my computer from the outside of the LAN. So, I
did the following: on the target computer I ran:
ssh -R 10002:localhost:22 u...@middle.host (it's a computer somewhere
and I have ssh access there)
Now I can connect to the target computer in a few steps:
1. connect to middle.host:
ssh u...@middle.host
2. and from there:
ssh hi...@home.computer -p 10002
See, it's not very convenient and I'm not sure whether it's possible
to use VNC using this setup (as I would like to).  So, is there any
better solution?
-- 
Hiisi.
Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: http://counter.li.org/
--
Spandex is a privilege, not a right.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: flash on www.nbc.com

2010-03-08 Thread Patrick Bartek
--- On Mon, 3/8/10, Temlakos  wrote:

> On 03/08/2010 06:59 PM, Patrick
> Bartek wrote:
> > --- On Mon, 3/8/10, Temlakos 
> wrote:
> >
> >    
> >> On 03/08/2010 01:02 PM, Patrick
> >> Bartek wrote:
> >>
> >>      
> > [snip]
> >
> >         
>   
>  Has this anything to do with why videos
> won't play
>           
> >> on
> >>      
>  foxnews.com when I
>  browse them in Firefox?
> 
>  YouTube and other shared-service videos
> play fine,
>           
> >> and so
> >>      
>  do the videos
>  that I embed. But foxnews.com won't play
> at all.
> 
>  Do I need a plugin to get it to work? Or
> do those
>           
> >> videos
> >>      
>  not play nice
>  with flashplayer?
> 
>           
> >>> Both (Foxnews&   YouTube)
> work fine here in
> >>>        
> >> Firefox 3.5.8 and Flash 10.0 R45 all 64-bit. 
> No
> >> special configurations.  Basically, a stock
> install of
> >> F12.
> >>      
> >>> What version flash player do you have? 
> And what
> >>>        
> >> OS?
> >>      
> >>> B
> >>>
> >>>        
> >> Flash-plugin version 10.0.45.2
> >>
> >> 32-bit architecture (i686)
> >>
> >> Fedora 12, with KDE
> >>
> >> Firefox Version 3.5
> >>
> >> In this setup, YouTube works. Foxnews does not.
> >>      
> > I'm using GNOME.  For years, I had recurring
> problems playing Flash (and other multimedia files) through
> any browser, but Firefox was the most problematical. 
> Some sites worked fine; others wouldn't work at all; some
> would work, but with frequent crashes or freezes or
> stuttering requiring reloading/restarting the browser. 
> To make a long story short, using yum, I completely
> uninstalled Totem and all its related files, installed
> mplayer-plugin (and its dependencies), and that cured 98% of
> the multimedia problems.  Sites that wouldn't work, now
> did. Flash was installed manually per Adobe's directions.
> >
> > Maybe, there are some KDE plugins, etc. that Foxnews
> doesn't like or can't recognize and stops.  What
> plugins do you have installed?
> >
> > B
> >
> >    
> 
> I have a bunch of Totem and Totem-compatible plugins,
> including one for 
> Windows Media.
> 
> So you used mplayer-plugin as a replacement. Maybe I can do
> that--so 
> long as I don't have to get rid of VLC.

I initially tried VLC as a plugin (and stand-alone player) with and without 
Totem, but decided to uninstall it before installing mplayer.  Since mplayer 
and its browser plugin worked to my satisfaction, I never bothered reinstalling 
VLC.  My video and multimedia requirements are very basic anyway. So, I didn't 
need anything more sophisticated than mplayer.

I doubt if VLC will cause problems, if installed along with mplayer, as long as 
everything is configured properly.  Try.  You can always uninstall one or the 
other, if there are conflicts.

B
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Problem with an external usb HD - slow usb

2010-03-08 Thread Paolo Galtieri
On 03/08/2010 06:16 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 12:26 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
>
>> On 03/08/2010 11:53 AM, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
>>  
>>> 2010/3/8 Patrick O'Callaghan
>>>
>>>
 [Please don't top-post on this list]

 First of all, is this device a real hard disk, i.e. a mechanically
 rotating magnetic surface, or is it some kind of Flash drive?

  
>>> Hi,
>>> sorry for top post and sorry about the poor english.
>>> It is not a flash drive, is an real HD.
>>>
>>> I search a lot on www about this issue and the only clue i find is
>>> about sync/async option when mount the device and verify if it is
>>> connected to usb 2.0 hub.
>>> The strange thing is if i use windows to copy this diretory (drag on
>>> drop), the full operation last more or less two six (copy directory
>>> and umount - "eject" - the device),
>>> The same operation under fedora last a lot longer. (last day, i let
>>> the copy last for a full day and it is not finished - i pause in the
>>> middle).
>>>
>>> []'s
>>> Luigi Castro Cardeles
>>>
>>>
>> I have a similar problem.  I have 2 external USB disk drives, one is
>> 1.5TB the other 1TB.  Copies to and from the external disks to the local
>> disk, or between the 2 external disks, take a long time and while the
>> copy is going on the system is essentially unusable, e.g.. it can take
>> 15 to 30 seconds for virtual desktops to update.  Moving the mouse is
>> very jerky, the mouse stops for 5 to 10 seconds then moves then stops
>> again.  I run netbeans IDE with the netbeans projects on one of the
>> external drives.  Even when I'm not doing anything with the IDE the disk
>> light on my laptop will go on solid for several minutes leading to slow
>> response times.
>>
>> I'm running on a 2Ghz Core 2 Duo processor with 2Gb memory.  What I
>> notice during the copies is that both CPUs are 75 - 90% in wait state.
>> I'm also running an encrypted root file system.
>>
>> The problem is really bad when I try running VMware Workstation 7.  The
>> virtual machines are all located on one of the external disks.   When I
>> run one VM the system response time on the system degrades significantly
>> as noted above and I have to shutdown the VM if I want to get anything
>> done.
>>  
> Random comments:
>
> * Are the two disks on the same USB bus (use lsusb to check)? If so,
> move one of them.
>
> * USB is a cpu-intensive protocol (compared with Firewire or SATA) since
> it basically doesn't do any DMA, i.e. every 1kb or whatever protocol
> transfer requires cpu intervention. The wire speed is only part of the
> story.
>
> * If your VM is configured with a lot of RAM, your host will tend to
> swap more, but on your swap device which is probably SATA (you aren't
> using the USB disks as swap are you?). If it's configured with less RAM,
> the guest will swap more (between VM RAM and VM disk), which puts a
> higher load on the kernel. You can try fiddling with the configuration
> to see if it makes a difference.
>
> poc
>
>
The drives are on different busses. One drive is plugged into a hub the 
other directly into the laptop.  The VM is configured with 1Gb of RAM 
which is half the total amount.  Obviously increasing the system RAM 
will help some.  The swap partition is on the system drive.  I'll take a 
look at the VM configus and see if there is anything I can change.   All 
the partitions on the 2 external USB drives are ntfs so there is that 
issue as well.  I'll do some playing around.

Thanks,
Paolo
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Problem with an external usb HD - slow usb

2010-03-08 Thread Mikkel
On 03/08/2010 08:17 PM, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
> 
> Hi Mikkel,
> 
> cat /var/log/messages
> 
> usb 2-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd
> 
That is another reason your drive is slow. You are connected at USB
1.1 speeds, instead of USB 2.0 speeds.

new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd

It does not make a lot of sense, but the speeds go:

slow speed
high speed
full speed

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Problem with an external usb HD - slow usb

2010-03-08 Thread Luigi Castro Cardeles
2010/3/8 Mikkel :
> I know you posted it, but I must have deleted the message. Is the
> drive connecting at full speed, or hi speed?
>
> Mikkel
> --
>
>  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
> for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
>
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>
>

Hi Mikkel,

cat /var/log/messages

usb 2-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd

[]'s
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Problem with an external usb HD - slow usb

2010-03-08 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 12:26 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> On 03/08/2010 11:53 AM, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
> > 2010/3/8 Patrick O'Callaghan
> >
> >> [Please don't top-post on this list]
> >>
> >> First of all, is this device a real hard disk, i.e. a mechanically
> >> rotating magnetic surface, or is it some kind of Flash drive?
> >>  
> > Hi,
> > sorry for top post and sorry about the poor english.
> > It is not a flash drive, is an real HD.
> >
> > I search a lot on www about this issue and the only clue i find is
> > about sync/async option when mount the device and verify if it is
> > connected to usb 2.0 hub.
> > The strange thing is if i use windows to copy this diretory (drag on
> > drop), the full operation last more or less two six (copy directory
> > and umount - "eject" - the device),
> > The same operation under fedora last a lot longer. (last day, i let
> > the copy last for a full day and it is not finished - i pause in the
> > middle).
> >
> > []'s
> > Luigi Castro Cardeles
> >
> 
> I have a similar problem.  I have 2 external USB disk drives, one is 
> 1.5TB the other 1TB.  Copies to and from the external disks to the local 
> disk, or between the 2 external disks, take a long time and while the 
> copy is going on the system is essentially unusable, e.g.. it can take 
> 15 to 30 seconds for virtual desktops to update.  Moving the mouse is 
> very jerky, the mouse stops for 5 to 10 seconds then moves then stops 
> again.  I run netbeans IDE with the netbeans projects on one of the 
> external drives.  Even when I'm not doing anything with the IDE the disk 
> light on my laptop will go on solid for several minutes leading to slow 
> response times.
> 
> I'm running on a 2Ghz Core 2 Duo processor with 2Gb memory.  What I 
> notice during the copies is that both CPUs are 75 - 90% in wait state.  
> I'm also running an encrypted root file system.
> 
> The problem is really bad when I try running VMware Workstation 7.  The 
> virtual machines are all located on one of the external disks.   When I 
> run one VM the system response time on the system degrades significantly 
> as noted above and I have to shutdown the VM if I want to get anything 
> done.

Random comments:

* Are the two disks on the same USB bus (use lsusb to check)? If so,
move one of them.

* USB is a cpu-intensive protocol (compared with Firewire or SATA) since
it basically doesn't do any DMA, i.e. every 1kb or whatever protocol
transfer requires cpu intervention. The wire speed is only part of the
story.

* If your VM is configured with a lot of RAM, your host will tend to
swap more, but on your swap device which is probably SATA (you aren't
using the USB disks as swap are you?). If it's configured with less RAM,
the guest will swap more (between VM RAM and VM disk), which puts a
higher load on the kernel. You can try fiddling with the configuration
to see if it makes a difference.

poc

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Problem with an external usb HD - slow usb

2010-03-08 Thread Mikkel
On 03/08/2010 05:53 PM, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
> 
> well, ntfs filesystem doesn't accept async/sync param... Tom show that
> to me (man mount.ntfs-3g).
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571508
> 
> i will try that Patrick and post the results.
> 
> Start to look for another solution :)
> 
I know you posted it, but I must have deleted the message. Is the
drive connecting at full speed, or hi speed?

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: ssh to my computer behind NAT

2010-03-08 Thread Rick Sewill
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 00:49 +0300, Hiisi wrote: 
> Dear list!
> I would like to be able to ssh to my home computer located behind my
> ISP' NAT. I know, I can tunnel to it through some middle host and
> actually I'm doing it at the moment. But I'm fancy is there a better
> solution? Is there a possibility of not using any computer at the
> middle to connect to my home system from the outside world? Can I
> connect to it directly using some magic setup? Any thoughts?
> -- 
> Hiisi.
> Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: http://counter.li.org/
> --
> Spandex is a privilege, not a right.

You said something about a middle host.  This middle host confuses me.
Is this middle host controlled by the ISP?  What is this middle host?

When I worked for a certain company, I had to ssh to a gateway host.
They didn't want anyone able to ssh directly to their internal LAN.
When you said middle host, I thought of that company and their gateway.

I would be surprised if an ISP requires you to go to a middle host.
I would expect an ISP to use the NAT where only IP addresses change.
I would expect an ISP to forward all ports to your assigned IP address.

If the ISP provided a router to you, that is doing NAT,
you should be able to configure that router to forward your ssh port.

I would not be surprised if a company requires you to go to a gateway.

If it's a company gateway, we mustn't help you defeat their security.

I don't want to discuss whether having a gateway adds to security.
Personally, I believe all devices in the internal LAN must be secure.
I do not believe security can be done solely at the border of a LAN.

Do you control the device that is doing NAT for you or does the ISP?
If controlled by the ISP, did the ISP provide a way to configure it?

As others have said and will say, one needs to have the NAT device
port forward the appropriate port (whatever port you use for ssh)
to your host.


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: flash on www.nbc.com

2010-03-08 Thread Temlakos
On 03/08/2010 06:59 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> --- On Mon, 3/8/10, Temlakos  wrote:
>
>
>> On 03/08/2010 01:02 PM, Patrick
>> Bartek wrote:
>>
>>  
> [snip]
>
>
 Has this anything to do with why videos won't play
  
>> on
>>  
 foxnews.com when I
 browse them in Firefox?

 YouTube and other shared-service videos play fine,
  
>> and so
>>  
 do the videos
 that I embed. But foxnews.com won't play at all.

 Do I need a plugin to get it to work? Or do those
  
>> videos
>>  
 not play nice
 with flashplayer?

  
>>> Both (Foxnews&   YouTube) work fine here in
>>>
>> Firefox 3.5.8 and Flash 10.0 R45 all 64-bit.  No
>> special configurations.  Basically, a stock install of
>> F12.
>>  
>>> What version flash player do you have?  And what
>>>
>> OS?
>>  
>>> B
>>>
>>>
>> Flash-plugin version 10.0.45.2
>>
>> 32-bit architecture (i686)
>>
>> Fedora 12, with KDE
>>
>> Firefox Version 3.5
>>
>> In this setup, YouTube works. Foxnews does not.
>>  
> I'm using GNOME.  For years, I had recurring problems playing Flash (and 
> other multimedia files) through any browser, but Firefox was the most 
> problematical.  Some sites worked fine; others wouldn't work at all; some 
> would work, but with frequent crashes or freezes or stuttering requiring 
> reloading/restarting the browser.  To make a long story short, using yum, I 
> completely uninstalled Totem and all its related files, installed 
> mplayer-plugin (and its dependencies), and that cured 98% of the multimedia 
> problems.  Sites that wouldn't work, now did. Flash was installed manually 
> per Adobe's directions.
>
> Maybe, there are some KDE plugins, etc. that Foxnews doesn't like or can't 
> recognize and stops.  What plugins do you have installed?
>
> B
>
>

I have a bunch of Totem and Totem-compatible plugins, including one for 
Windows Media.

So you used mplayer-plugin as a replacement. Maybe I can do that--so 
long as I don't have to get rid of VLC.

Temlakos
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: flash on www.nbc.com

2010-03-08 Thread Patrick Bartek
--- On Mon, 3/8/10, Temlakos  wrote:

> On 03/08/2010 01:02 PM, Patrick
> Bartek wrote:
>
> >>> [snip]
> >>>        
> >> Has this anything to do with why videos won't play
> on
> >> foxnews.com when I
> >> browse them in Firefox?
> >>
> >> YouTube and other shared-service videos play fine,
> and so
> >> do the videos
> >> that I embed. But foxnews.com won't play at all.
> >>
> >> Do I need a plugin to get it to work? Or do those
> videos
> >> not play nice
> >> with flashplayer?
> >>      
> > Both (Foxnews&  YouTube) work fine here in
> Firefox 3.5.8 and Flash 10.0 R45 all 64-bit.  No
> special configurations.  Basically, a stock install of
> F12.
> >
> > What version flash player do you have?  And what
> OS?
> >
> > B
> >    
> 
> Flash-plugin version 10.0.45.2
> 
> 32-bit architecture (i686)
> 
> Fedora 12, with KDE
> 
> Firefox Version 3.5
> 
> In this setup, YouTube works. Foxnews does not.

I'm using GNOME.  For years, I had recurring problems playing Flash (and other 
multimedia files) through any browser, but Firefox was the most problematical.  
Some sites worked fine; others wouldn't work at all; some would work, but with 
frequent crashes or freezes or stuttering requiring reloading/restarting the 
browser.  To make a long story short, using yum, I completely uninstalled Totem 
and all its related files, installed mplayer-plugin (and its dependencies), and 
that cured 98% of the multimedia problems.  Sites that wouldn't work, now did. 
Flash was installed manually per Adobe's directions.

Maybe, there are some KDE plugins, etc. that Foxnews doesn't like or can't 
recognize and stops.  What plugins do you have installed?

B  

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Problem with an external usb HD - slow usb

2010-03-08 Thread Luigi Castro Cardeles
2010/3/8 Patrick O'Callaghan :
> It would be interesting to see what happens with a different filesystem,
> e.g. ext3 or ext4, that doesn't use fuse. If that's not practical
> because the disk contains real data, perhaps you could create a small
> partition with one of the kernel-supported filesystems and measure that.
>
> If that shows a big difference, check if fuse has enough working memory,
> or if there's any way to instrument it (I know very little about fuse so
> I can't help there). Or even try it with a vm-based Windows installation
> (I know it sounds wierd, but it could be interesting to try).
>
> poc
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>

well, ntfs filesystem doesn't accept async/sync param... Tom show that
to me (man mount.ntfs-3g).

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571508

i will try that Patrick and post the results.

Start to look for another solution :)

[]'s
Luigi Castro Cardeles
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: ssh to my computer behind NAT

2010-03-08 Thread Konstantin Svist
On 03/08/2010 01:49 PM, Hiisi wrote:
> Dear list!
> I would like to be able to ssh to my home computer located behind my
> ISP' NAT. I know, I can tunnel to it through some middle host and
> actually I'm doing it at the moment. But I'm fancy is there a better
> solution? Is there a possibility of not using any computer at the
> middle to connect to my home system from the outside world? Can I
> connect to it directly using some magic setup? Any thoughts?
>   

Just make the modem/router that your ISP gave you forward a port for ssh
and you should be all set.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: ssh to my computer behind NAT

2010-03-08 Thread Steven Stern
On 03/08/2010 03:49 PM, Hiisi wrote:
> Dear list!
> I would like to be able to ssh to my home computer located behind my
> ISP' NAT. I know, I can tunnel to it through some middle host and
> actually I'm doing it at the moment. But I'm fancy is there a better
> solution? Is there a possibility of not using any computer at the
> middle to connect to my home system from the outside world? Can I
> connect to it directly using some magic setup? Any thoughts?

I have ports (not 22) set on the my router that route SSH traffic to one
of two computers on the network.  Just check your router/modem/thing.

-- 
-- Steve
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


ssh to my computer behind NAT

2010-03-08 Thread Hiisi
Dear list!
I would like to be able to ssh to my home computer located behind my
ISP' NAT. I know, I can tunnel to it through some middle host and
actually I'm doing it at the moment. But I'm fancy is there a better
solution? Is there a possibility of not using any computer at the
middle to connect to my home system from the outside world? Can I
connect to it directly using some magic setup? Any thoughts?
-- 
Hiisi.
Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: http://counter.li.org/
--
Spandex is a privilege, not a right.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: FC12 livecd-iso-to-disk woes

2010-03-08 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 02:39:33 -0800,
  Don Quixote de la Mancha  wrote:
> 
> I haven't tried it myself, or looked at the livecd-iso-to-disk code,
> but are you sure that you want /dev/sdc1 and not /dev/sdc?

You can make either work and I have done so. However some bios' will only
boot from one type or the other. I haven't figured out everything related to
this, but NTFS support is one area that seems to be different depending
on whether or not you use a partition table. A different bootstrap method
is used depending on whether or not you use a partition table. And I think
only one currently supports NTFS. I wanted to use NTFS in order to support
a squashfs image over 4 GiB and be mountable on random Windows machines.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Changing the DHCP address of a machine on my Local LAN

2010-03-08 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 10:58 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: 
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 09:20 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > ATT super-experts charged me $29 for 20 minutes 
> 
> You have to pay for technical support?  Wow...  Both of the ISPs here
> have toll free (and free of charge) technical support.  In fact, the one
> that I do some occasional work for will even send me over to your house
> to re-configure your computer or change your network card.  No charge to
> the customer.  They will even provide you with a network card.

Not for all  technical support. I don't know what made this question different. 
They have
never charged me before. And of course they make it clear that they
don't support Linux.


--
===
If God had intended Man to program, we'd be born with serial I/O ports.
===
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: How to install software without root password (PolicyKit?)

2010-03-08 Thread Valent Turkovic
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Tom H  wrote:
>>> Fedora 12 should was planned to have installation of packages without
>>> users needing to enter root password. How do I enable this feature via
>
>> Is this a question for developers list if nobody here know how to do that?
>
> This was the default when F12 was released and I reversed it with
> pklalockdown –lockdown org.freedesktop.packagekit.package-install
> so you can probably re-enable it with
> pklalockdown something

I even found this article:
http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/polkit-and-package-kit-and-changing-settings/

But it didn't help :(



-- 
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
blog: http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com
linux, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless, ronjenje, pametne kuće, zwave
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turko...@hotmail.com
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: FC12 livecd-iso-to-disk woes - now suicidal

2010-03-08 Thread dexter
On 8 March 2010 16:58, T. Horsnell  wrote:
> dexter wrote:
>> On 8 March 2010 10:35, T. Horsnell  wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I'm trying to make a USB version of the FC12 livecd.
>>> I follow the instructions at:
>>>
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraLiveCD/USBHowTo
>>>
>>> and type (as root):
>>>
>>> # livecd-iso-to-disk --format --reset-mbr Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdc1
>>>
>>> but the resulting USB stick just gives me 'Boot Error' when I boot it.
>>>
>>> If I use the dd method:
>>>
>>> # dd if=Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso of=/dev/sdc bs=8M
>>>
>>> it boots correctly. I ultimately want a persistent-storage
>>> area so the dd solution is no good for me.
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>> try liveusb-creator then bugzilla :-)
>>
>> ...dex
>
> Well, I've so far tried all the suggestions (except bugzilla),
> and *nothing* works. I must be doing something wrong.
>
> On my FC9 with livecd-tools-0.17.3-1.fc9

FC9 why didnt you say :-) its definetly not going to work on FC9 you
need to upgrade syslinux I have syslinux-3.75-2.dex.fc9.i686 self
built & livecd-tools-017.2-1.fc9.i386 I havent tried building a respin
on FC9 lately because of the rpm & squashfs changes around FC11 but I
can still write useable FC12.iso usb-sticks from FC9 due to the
syslinux upgrade.

> Ive tried:
>  livecd-iso-to-disk Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdc1

this should have worked?
Sorry I cant see what your doing wrong from here so if you downloaded
the iso check the checksum again and give your stick a good look to.
(bootable,vfat,ext3/4,etc)

>  livecd-iso-to-disk Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdc (required mkdosfs -I and 
> mkfs.vfat -I)

This is wrong in my book its always the partition and not the whole
disk i.e sdc1

>  liveusb-creator Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso
> and, thinking it might be a subtle difference in the iso structure,
> I tried the same commands with Fedora-9-i686-Live.iso
>
> They all failed with a 'Boot error'.
>
> I then moved to my newly installed and updated FC12 system, with 
> livecd-tools-031-1.fc12.1 and tried:
>  livecd-iso-to-disk Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdb1
>  livecd-iso-to-disk --format --reset-mbr Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdb1
>  livecd-iso-to-disk --format --reset-mbr Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdb
>  liveusb-creator Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso
>
> These also failed in the same way.
>
> The only thing that works is 'dd if=Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso of=/dev/sdb bs=8M'
> and if it wasnt for this I would think either my memsticks or my bios were 
> faulty.

Well if thats the case the stick & iso & bios are good?? ignore what I
said earlier reguarding checking.

...dex
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: request

2010-03-08 Thread Don Quixote de la Mancha
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Amiga5  wrote:
> who sent you mail anyway

The Mail Daemon.  It's objective is to entrap your immortal soul.

Don Quixote
-- 
Don Quixote de la Mancha
quix...@dulcineatech.com
http://www.dulcineatech.com

   Dulcinea Technologies Corporation: Software of Elegance and Beauty.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Problem with an external usb HD - slow usb

2010-03-08 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 15:53 -0300, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
> 2010/3/8 Patrick O'Callaghan 
> > [Please don't top-post on this list]
> >
> > First of all, is this device a real hard disk, i.e. a mechanically
> > rotating magnetic surface, or is it some kind of Flash drive?
> 
> Hi,
> sorry for top post and sorry about the poor english.
> It is not a flash drive, is an real HD.
> 
> I search a lot on www about this issue and the only clue i find is
> about sync/async option when mount the device and verify if it is
> connected to usb 2.0 hub.
> The strange thing is if i use windows to copy this diretory (drag on
> drop), the full operation last more or less two six (copy directory
> and umount - "eject" - the device),
> The same operation under fedora last a lot longer. (last day, i let
> the copy last for a full day and it is not finished - i pause in the
> middle).

It would be interesting to see what happens with a different filesystem,
e.g. ext3 or ext4, that doesn't use fuse. If that's not practical
because the disk contains real data, perhaps you could create a small
partition with one of the kernel-supported filesystems and measure that.

If that shows a big difference, check if fuse has enough working memory,
or if there's any way to instrument it (I know very little about fuse so
I can't help there). Or even try it with a vm-based Windows installation
(I know it sounds wierd, but it could be interesting to try).

poc

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Problem with an external usb HD - slow usb

2010-03-08 Thread Paolo Galtieri
On 03/08/2010 11:53 AM, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
> 2010/3/8 Patrick O'Callaghan
>
>> [Please don't top-post on this list]
>>
>> First of all, is this device a real hard disk, i.e. a mechanically
>> rotating magnetic surface, or is it some kind of Flash drive?
>>  
> Hi,
> sorry for top post and sorry about the poor english.
> It is not a flash drive, is an real HD.
>
> I search a lot on www about this issue and the only clue i find is
> about sync/async option when mount the device and verify if it is
> connected to usb 2.0 hub.
> The strange thing is if i use windows to copy this diretory (drag on
> drop), the full operation last more or less two six (copy directory
> and umount - "eject" - the device),
> The same operation under fedora last a lot longer. (last day, i let
> the copy last for a full day and it is not finished - i pause in the
> middle).
>
> []'s
> Luigi Castro Cardeles
>

I have a similar problem.  I have 2 external USB disk drives, one is 
1.5TB the other 1TB.  Copies to and from the external disks to the local 
disk, or between the 2 external disks, take a long time and while the 
copy is going on the system is essentially unusable, e.g.. it can take 
15 to 30 seconds for virtual desktops to update.  Moving the mouse is 
very jerky, the mouse stops for 5 to 10 seconds then moves then stops 
again.  I run netbeans IDE with the netbeans projects on one of the 
external drives.  Even when I'm not doing anything with the IDE the disk 
light on my laptop will go on solid for several minutes leading to slow 
response times.

I'm running on a 2Ghz Core 2 Duo processor with 2Gb memory.  What I 
notice during the copies is that both CPUs are 75 - 90% in wait state.  
I'm also running an encrypted root file system.

The problem is really bad when I try running VMware Workstation 7.  The 
virtual machines are all located on one of the external disks.   When I 
run one VM the system response time on the system degrades significantly 
as noted above and I have to shutdown the VM if I want to get anything 
done.

Paolo
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Relating to ad hoc wireless network

2010-03-08 Thread sandeep Patel
Hello all,
 I would like to know about how to create ad hoc wireless
network on the Internet-connected computer in fedora-12.And How to add other
computers to this network.Please help me.
-- 
Sandeep Kumar Patel
University of Hyderabad
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Fedora - IBM x3650x M2 - .iso

2010-03-08 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 15:44 +0530, RAMAKISHOREBABU KOPPULA wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> I want to install Fedora 12 on IBM x3650 M2 system (Config details: 2
> quad-core Intel® Xeon® X5500 series with Intel QuickPath Interconnect
> (QPI) technology, up to 2.93 GHz and up to 1333 MHz front-side bus).
> Which .iso file do I need to download for this hardware?
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Kishore

x86_64 DVD.
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/12/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-12-x86_64-DVD.iso

We've installed it on a couple of IBM 3650M2 machines without an issue.
(I think we forced pci=msix, but I'm not sure)

- Gilboa


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


RE: request

2010-03-08 Thread Amiga5
who sent you mail anyway

 

From: rajendra choudhary [mailto:rajendracs...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 7:42 AM
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: request

 

please...
don,t send me further any mail..

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Problem with an external usb HD - slow usb

2010-03-08 Thread Luigi Castro Cardeles
2010/3/8 Patrick O'Callaghan 
> [Please don't top-post on this list]
>
> First of all, is this device a real hard disk, i.e. a mechanically
> rotating magnetic surface, or is it some kind of Flash drive?

Hi,
sorry for top post and sorry about the poor english.
It is not a flash drive, is an real HD.

I search a lot on www about this issue and the only clue i find is
about sync/async option when mount the device and verify if it is
connected to usb 2.0 hub.
The strange thing is if i use windows to copy this diretory (drag on
drop), the full operation last more or less two six (copy directory
and umount - "eject" - the device),
The same operation under fedora last a lot longer. (last day, i let
the copy last for a full day and it is not finished - i pause in the
middle).

[]'s
Luigi Castro Cardeles
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: [389-users] StartTLS issue

2010-03-08 Thread Maurizio Marini
On Saturday 06 March 2010, Maurizio Marini wrote:
> at the point to get SID, i get startTLS errors:

i reply  to myself :)
at last i solved the issue reading this thread:

http://www.mail-archive.com/sa...@lists.samba.org/msg101414.html

so, putting:
ldap ssl = off

issue is off, too

maybe this can save time to someone

-- 
maurizio
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


Re: Fedora 12: Cannot boot with kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64

2010-03-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:19:52 -0600
Rick Sewill  wrote:

> Questions please:
> 1) Are there 3 drivers, nvidia, nv, nouveau?

Yes. 

> 2) If there are 3 drivers, how did people decide which driver to use?

The Fedora default is 'nouveau'. 

>My questions on this subject, are as follows:
>a) Is the nouveau driver now considered better than the nv driver?
>   If the nouveau driver is considered better, I am curious why?

Yes. It's maintained actively and is making rapid improvements. 
The nv driver is hardly maintained anymore. 

>b) Is it true the nvidia driver is faster than the nouveau driver?

In Fedora 12 the nouveau driver has no 3d. The binary only non free
nvidia one does. 

>   I wanted to use the "free" driver, if possible, so I was using
> nv. I switched to nouveau because that seemed to be the new default.
>   I am wondering what I am giving up not using the nvidia driver.

3d. 

However, Fedora 13 should have 3d support in nouveau for lots of cards. 

kevin



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: flash on www.nbc.com

2010-03-08 Thread Temlakos
On 03/08/2010 01:02 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> --- On Mon, 3/8/10, Temlakos  wrote:
>
>
>> On 03/08/2010 01:35 AM, Patrick
>> Bartek wrote:
>>  
>>> --- On Sun, 3/7/10, Michael Hennebry
>>>
>> wrote:
>>  
>>>
>>>
 Is there some trick to getting flash
 to work through firefox?
 When I click on a Chuck episode,
 the peacock shows up and wiggles its tail, but
  
>> that is all
>>  
 that happens.
 Zoom in works.
 I've running FC 11.
 About tells me that I'm running Adobe Flash
  
>> Player
>>  
 10,0,45,2 .

 I can play flash on some sites.
 On others, I can download and use mplayer.
 On www.nbc.com, neither.

  
>>> 32 or 64-bit F11/Flash?
>>>
>>> Doesn't work either with my 64-bit F12, 64-bit Flash
>>>
>> 10.0 R45.  Won't play Chuck through www.fancast.com
>> either, because it gets it from Hulu  which has
>> problems with Linux 64-bit Flash though a browser, but not
>> through its Huludesktop app.  However, 32-bit OS and/or
>> 32-bit Flash might work.
>>  
>>> I just checked using VirtualBox running Puppy Linux
>>>
>> (32-bit) with the default SeaMonkey browser.  NBC
>> wouldn't work, but fancast did, even though the display in
>> Sea Monkey was shifted.  I have yet to install
>> Firefox.  So, I can't check it.
>>  
>>> B
>>>
>>>
>> Has this anything to do with why videos won't play on
>> foxnews.com when I
>> browse them in Firefox?
>>
>> YouTube and other shared-service videos play fine, and so
>> do the videos
>> that I embed. But foxnews.com won't play at all.
>>
>> Do I need a plugin to get it to work? Or do those videos
>> not play nice
>> with flashplayer?
>>  
> Both (Foxnews&  YouTube) work fine here in Firefox 3.5.8 and Flash 10.0 R45 
> all 64-bit.  No special configurations.  Basically, a stock install of F12.
>
> What version flash player do you have?  And what OS?
>
> B
>

Flash-plugin version 10.0.45.2

32-bit architecture (i686)

Fedora 12, with KDE

Firefox Version 3.5

In this setup, YouTube works. Foxnews does not.

Temlakos
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Fedora 12: Cannot boot with kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64

2010-03-08 Thread Rick Sewill
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 09:19 -0600, John Thompson wrote: 
> On 03/08/2010 03:32 AM, Fred Williams wrote:
> 
> > If all I need to do is try running without the proprietary NVidia
> > driver,
> > please let me know specifically how to disable that driver the easiest
> > possible way. �Translation: so that I can just boot back into an older
> > kernel and continue using the proprietary NVidia driver if I decide
> > to do that.
> 
> In your /etc/X11/xorg.conf you need to change the driver from "nvidia"
> (the proprietary driver) to "nv" (the open source driver).
> 
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "Device0"
> Driver "nvidia"  #  <= THIS LINE
> VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation"
> BoardName  "GeForce 6600 GT"
> Option "AccelMethod" "XAA" # not EXA
> 
> BTW, what I do when I update the kernel is first boot into runlevel 3,
> then build the proprietary driver modules, and then change to runlevel 5.
> 
> -- 
> 
> -John (j...@os2.dhs.org)


When I upgraded to Fedora 12, 

I had an error, to the effect, hardware was already in use.
I found the "nouveau" driver had the hardware.
My xorg.conf file was using the "nv" driver.
Not thinking, I changed from the "nv" driver to the "nouveau" driver. 

Searching the Internet, for the words, blacklist nouveau,
I found the following comment at URL:
http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Fedora/2010-01/msg02113.html

The summary of the comment was, if you use the rpmfusion repository,
for the nvidia module, it will automatically blacklist nouveau?

If I do an Internet, search for the words, blacklist nouveau nv,
I find indications some people, not sure who, claimed the nouveau
driver has passed up the nv driver, and has been made the default.

Questions please:
1) Are there 3 drivers, nvidia, nv, nouveau?
2) If there are 3 drivers, how did people decide which driver to use?
   My questions on this subject, are as follows:
   a) Is the nouveau driver now considered better than the nv driver?
  If the nouveau driver is considered better, I am curious why?
   b) Is it true the nvidia driver is faster than the nouveau driver?
  I wanted to use the "free" driver, if possible, so I was using nv.
  I switched to nouveau because that seemed to be the new default.
  I am wondering what I am giving up not using the nvidia driver.

-Rick

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: flash on www.nbc.com

2010-03-08 Thread Patrick Bartek
--- On Mon, 3/8/10, Michael Hennebry  wrote:

> On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, Patrick Bartek
> wrote:
> 
> > --- On Sun, 3/7/10, Michael Hennebry 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Is there some trick to getting flash
> >> to work through firefox?
> >> When I click on a Chuck episode,
> >> the peacock shows up and wiggles its tail, but
> that is all
> >> that happens.
> >> Zoom in works.
> >> I've running FC 11.
> >> About tells me that I'm running Adobe Flash
> Player
> >> 10,0,45,2 .
> >>
> >> I can play flash on some sites.
> >> On others, I can download and use mplayer.
> >> On www.nbc.com, neither.
> >
> > 32 or 64-bit F11/Flash?
> 
> 32-bit.  Pentium 4 with hyper-threading.

Try playing Chuck through www.hulu.com or www.fancast.com, and see if it works. 
 Do show clips play at NBC?

B
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: flash on www.nbc.com

2010-03-08 Thread Patrick Bartek
--- On Mon, 3/8/10, Aaron Konstam  wrote:

> On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 18:31 -0600,
> Michael Hennebry wrote: 
> > Is there some trick to getting flash to work through
> firefox?
> > When I click on a Chuck episode,
> > the peacock shows up and wiggles its tail, but that is
> all that happens.
> > Zoom in works.
> > I've running FC 11.
> > About tells me that I'm running Adobe Flash Player
> 10,0,45,2 .
> > 
> > I can play flash on some sites.
> > On others, I can download and use mplayer.
> > On www.nbc.com, neither.
> It is not you or the flash player. When I tried it. Law and
> Order played
> but when I tried Chuck the behavior was the same as you
> saw. Just the
> Peacock.

There are no full episodes of L&O that I could find to verify.  (NBC's site 
layout is a hodge-podge morass.)  Clips worked fine on L&O, plus, all the other 
shows I checked, but none of the full episodes did.  Just the Peacock 
animation, but without sound.  I know there's suppose to be audio with it.

B
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Problem with an external usb HD - slow usb

2010-03-08 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 12:16 -0300, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
> Hi list and Patrick,
> 
> 
> the default max_sectors is 240. I change this to 1024 like you said
> but the problem continue.
> 
> 
> If i try the speed:
> 
> 
> time dd if=/dev/sdc1 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=5
> i get that speed: 972 MB/s
> 
> 
> but if i run rsync, the upload transfer rate is very slow ( begins at
> 4MB/s and goes below until 0.7KB/s)

[Please don't top-post on this list]

First of all, is this device a real hard disk, i.e. a mechanically
rotating magnetic surface, or is it some kind of Flash drive?

If it's the latter, then read on.

I've been looking into this recently because of wildly varying
performance when writing to a pendrive. It turns out that Flash memory
isn't "really" random access when it comes to writing (reading is OK
though). Quick summary:

The Flash technology only allows writing zeroes, not ones, and is
organized in blocks of say 128 or 512 bytes (this varies according to
manufacturer) so to write some binary data in the middle of an existing
block the procedure is:

1) Read the entire block to some short-term scratch memory
2) Reset the block to all 1's.
3) Modify the scratch memory with the new bits
4) Copy the 0 bits of the scratch to the Flash block

(all this happens inside the drive of course; AFAIK it's not visible
even at the level of the kernel driver).

This process takes a very long time, and when you're repeatedly writing
small amounts of data (e.g. to update a directory) it all has to be done
multiple times, even for the same drive block. A few days ago I copied a
2GB file to an existing VFAT filesystem on an 8GB pendrive, reputedly
one of the fastest on the market. It took over two hours. I then tried
just simply copying the data directly to the drive using 'dd' (i.e. no
filesystem). It finished in under 5 minutes.

BTW, rsync is a killer on these drives because it adds another layer of
reading and hashing. In this particular case it's a false economy.

poc


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: flash on www.nbc.com

2010-03-08 Thread Patrick Bartek
--- On Mon, 3/8/10, Temlakos  wrote:

> On 03/08/2010 01:35 AM, Patrick
> Bartek wrote:
> > --- On Sun, 3/7/10, Michael Hennebry 
> wrote:
> >
> >    
> >> Is there some trick to getting flash
> >> to work through firefox?
> >> When I click on a Chuck episode,
> >> the peacock shows up and wiggles its tail, but
> that is all
> >> that happens.
> >> Zoom in works.
> >> I've running FC 11.
> >> About tells me that I'm running Adobe Flash
> Player
> >> 10,0,45,2 .
> >>
> >> I can play flash on some sites.
> >> On others, I can download and use mplayer.
> >> On www.nbc.com, neither.
> >>      
> > 32 or 64-bit F11/Flash?
> >
> > Doesn't work either with my 64-bit F12, 64-bit Flash
> 10.0 R45.  Won't play Chuck through www.fancast.com
> either, because it gets it from Hulu  which has
> problems with Linux 64-bit Flash though a browser, but not
> through its Huludesktop app.  However, 32-bit OS and/or
> 32-bit Flash might work.
> >
> > I just checked using VirtualBox running Puppy Linux
> (32-bit) with the default SeaMonkey browser.  NBC
> wouldn't work, but fancast did, even though the display in
> Sea Monkey was shifted.  I have yet to install
> Firefox.  So, I can't check it.
> >
> > B
> >    
> 
> Has this anything to do with why videos won't play on
> foxnews.com when I 
> browse them in Firefox?
> 
> YouTube and other shared-service videos play fine, and so
> do the videos 
> that I embed. But foxnews.com won't play at all.
> 
> Do I need a plugin to get it to work? Or do those videos
> not play nice 
> with flashplayer?

Both (Foxnews & YouTube) work fine here in Firefox 3.5.8 and Flash 10.0 R45 all 
64-bit.  No special configurations.  Basically, a stock install of F12.

What version flash player do you have?  And what OS?

B
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: selinux file permissions

2010-03-08 Thread Rick Stevens
On 03/07/2010 05:01 AM, Mike Fleetwood wrote:
> On 6 March 2010 18:09, Gregory P. Ennis  wrote:
>> Dear List,
>>
>> I am finally getting into selinux. Â Can anyone on this list recommend a
>> tutorial?
>>
>> Is there a way to be able to do a list command like ls -alt to see the
>> selinux permissions of the file.
>>
>> Greg Ennis
>
> Check out the Fedora Documentation page
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/.  Contains all the documents including
> these for Fedora 12:
> SELinux User Guide
> SELinux Managing Confined Services Guide

Here's a couple of books, too, just for good measure:

SELINUX: NSA's Open Source Security Enhanced Linux by Bill McCarty
(published by O'Reilly)

SELinux by Example by Frank Mayer, Karl MacMillan and David Caplan
(published by Prentice Hall)

Good sources, both.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer  ri...@nerd.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-  Diplomacy: The art of saying "Nice doggy!" until you can find a   -
-big enough rock.-
--
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Problem with an external usb HD - slow usb

2010-03-08 Thread Luigi Castro Cardeles
Hi,

ntfs.

Nothing strange on dmesg or /var/log/messages.

There is something strange:
i set a line on fstab with some options (rw,async) but when i mount (mount
-a), i get this:
type fuseblk (rw,nosuid,nodev,allow_other,blksize=4096)

I found a bug about this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474282but it is closed but
not solved (i think).

I filled a this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571508.

I also find this:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537336(not fedora but
related i think).

[]'s
Luigi Castro Cardeles


2010/3/8 NoSpaze 

> Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 12:16 -0300 schrieb Luigi Castro Cardeles:
>
> > the default max_sectors is 240. I change this to 1024 like you said
> > but the problem continue.
> > time dd if=/dev/sdc1 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=5
> > i get that speed: 972 MB/s
> > but if i run rsync, the upload transfer rate is very slow ( begins at
> > 4MB/s and goes below until 0.7KB/s)
>
> Type of filesystem (ext3, ntfs)? Any noticeable messages on dmesg? Whta
> does "top" tracing reports while transferring? Maybe you can also
> check /var/log/messages
>
> Let us know.
> --
> Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo - nosp...@gmail.com
> otbits.blogspot.com / counter.li.org: #367962
> --
> (setq wq "This is emacs, not vi") -- Ingvar
>
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Snort alternative

2010-03-08 Thread Mr Gabriel
Have you tried to build the app from source code? Its worth trying if you 
really need that app on that distro. And its a good skill to have. 
--Original Message--
From: Luc MAIGNAN
Sender: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To: Community assistance, encouragement,and advice for using Fedora.
ReplyTo: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Snort alternative
Sent: 8 Mar 2010 5:42 PM

Hi,

I'm looking for an IP logger (I knew 'ippl' but it doesn't seem to be 
integrated to fedora packages) or a intrusion detector (snort). I've 
installed snort but I've seen on the snort's website that I have to paid 
to get snort rules !!!

What is the best tool to do both actions ?

Thanks for any help
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


---
Kind Regards,
Mr Gabriel (bberry mail)
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Snort alternative

2010-03-08 Thread iarly selbir | ski0s
take a look on OSSEC that introduces concept of Host-based intrusion
detection system.

http://www.ossec.net/

Regards,

- -
iarlyy selbir | ski0s

:wq!


On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for an IP logger (I knew 'ippl' but it doesn't seem to be
> integrated to fedora packages) or a intrusion detector (snort). I've
> installed snort but I've seen on the snort's website that I have to paid
> to get snort rules !!!
>
> What is the best tool to do both actions ?
>
> Thanks for any help
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Problem with an external usb HD - slow usb

2010-03-08 Thread NoSpaze
Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 12:16 -0300 schrieb Luigi Castro Cardeles:

> the default max_sectors is 240. I change this to 1024 like you said
> but the problem continue.
> time dd if=/dev/sdc1 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=5
> i get that speed: 972 MB/s
> but if i run rsync, the upload transfer rate is very slow ( begins at
> 4MB/s and goes below until 0.7KB/s)

Type of filesystem (ext3, ntfs)? Any noticeable messages on dmesg? Whta
does "top" tracing reports while transferring? Maybe you can also
check /var/log/messages

Let us know.
--
Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo - nosp...@gmail.com
otbits.blogspot.com / counter.li.org: #367962
--
(setq wq "This is emacs, not vi") -- Ingvar


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Snort alternative

2010-03-08 Thread Luc MAIGNAN
Hi,

I'm looking for an IP logger (I knew 'ippl' but it doesn't seem to be 
integrated to fedora packages) or a intrusion detector (snort). I've 
installed snort but I've seen on the snort's website that I have to paid 
to get snort rules !!!

What is the best tool to do both actions ?

Thanks for any help
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


F12: gparted & mtab

2010-03-08 Thread Daniel B. Thurman

Has anyone seen the following entries in /etc/mtab:

/etc/pki/dnssec-keys /var/named/chroot/etc/pki/dnssec-keys none rw,bind 0 0
/etc/rndc.key /var/named/chroot/etc/rndc.key none rw,bind 0 0
/usr/lib/bind /var/named/chroot/usr/lib/bind none rw,bind 0 0

These entries was discovered when I was using gparted
to view the partitions of my drives and I noticed for my
F12 drive/partition, gparted was showing the following
under the 'Mount Point' column:

/, /var/named/chroot/etc/pki/dnssec-key,
/var/named/chroot/etc/rndc.key,
/var/named/chroot/usr/lib/bind

It used to show only '/' before, but now gparted
shows this annoying line.

If I do a 'umount -a' followed by a 'mount -a'
the "problem" goes away...

So, what gives?

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Fedora 12: no sound after switch users

2010-03-08 Thread Mikkel
On 03/08/2010 06:48 AM, Neil Bird wrote:
> 
>Following on from another thread (in which gdm seemed to be stealing 
> sound-ability from users), I've updated to the latest pulseuadio RPMs from 
> updates-testing, and by situation seems to have gotten worse.
> 
>(NB: this is fedora 12;  it was all working swimmingly in fedora 10, from 
> which I upgraded a few weeks back).
> 
> 
>After a reboot, I log in.  I have sound, no problems AFAICT.  If I then 
> switch users for my wife to log in (while I remain logged in), she gets no 
> sound at all.
> 
>A quick investigation shows that her PA config. has dropped back to a 
> 'dummy' output device.  I can switch back to my login and hear my sound 
> again, but nothing i can do can get hers working again.
> 
>I am utterly at a loss as to how to debug/diagnose pulseaudio, it's gone 
> well beyond my ken;  can anyone help point me in the right direction?
> 
Before you do a lot of debugging, your system is working properly
with the default setup. When a user log on in the GUI mode, a PA
daemon is started for them. As soon as you play something through
PA, it grabs the ALSA device it is configured to use. If I remember
correctly, after so long with no output, it releases it again. The
problem when you change logins, the new one also starts its own PA
daemon. If there isn't a sound card available, it is stuck using the
dummy one.

One way to get around this is to run a system wide PA daemon. But
make sure you understand the security risk of doing so. (They are
pointed out in the docs.)

If my memory about PA releasing the sound card, you may be able to
work around it by tweeking the timeout setting, and making sure you
do not get any system sounds when changing users.

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: [389-users] Busy replica when deleting replication conflict

2010-03-08 Thread Juan Asensio Sánchez
One note, we have servers with version 1.1.3 and servers that have been
upgraded to version 1.2.5. Only the servers that have been upgraded to 1.2.5
are showing the busy replica error, not those with version 1.1.3. Hope this
could help.

Regards.


El 8 de marzo de 2010 16:50, Juan Asensio Sánchez escribió:

> These are the messages when enabling replication logs:
>
> [08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 op=11
> repl="o=X,dc=X,dc=X": Replica in use locking_purl=conn=207283
> id=3
> [08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 op=11
> replica="o=X,dc=X,dc=X": Unable to acquire replica: error:
> replica busy locked by conn=207283 id=3 for incremental update
> [08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 op=11
> repl="o=X,dc=X,dc=X": StartNSDS50ReplicationRequest: response=1
> rc=0
> [08/Mar/2010:16:02:54 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 op=13
> repl="o=X,dc=X,dc=X": Begin incremental protocol
>
> These are all the messages in the access.log referring the connection
> conn=207283
>
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 fd=607 slot=607 SSL connection
> from XX to XX
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 SSL 256-bit AES
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=0 BIND dn="cn=Replication
> Manager,cn=config" method=128 version=3
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97
> nentries=0 etime=0 dn="cn=replication manager,cn=config"
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=1 SRCH base="" scope=0
> filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension"
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101
> nentries=1 etime=0
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=2 SRCH base="" scope=0
> filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension"
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=101
> nentries=1 etime=0
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=3 EXT
> oid="2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.3" name="Netscape Replication Start Session"
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=120
> nentries=0 etime=0
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=4 DEL
> dn="nsuniqueid=f851c101-1dd111b2-a64db547-e406+uid=cabudenhos029p$,ou=computers,o=XX,dc=XX,dc=XX"
>
> And no more... As you can see, the replica is busy since 8:16 (now is
> 16:51, in Spain). I am locked :S.
>
>
> El 8 de marzo de 2010 16:44, Juan Asensio Sánchez escribió:
>
> At first sight, there are no messages neither in access or error logs, in
>> supplier or consumers. Last modification operation in the busy
>> replica/database is:
>>
>> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=4 DEL
>> dn="nsuniqueid=f851c101-1dd111b2-a64db547-e406+uid=cabudenhos029p$,ou=computers,o=XX,dc=XX,dc=XXX"
>>
>> which does not get any RESULT operation. I have just enabled replication
>> logs in the consumer to see any messages. As soon i get them, i will post.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>> 2010/3/8 Rich Megginson 
>>
>> Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:
>>> > Hi all
>>> >
>>> > I have posted this on the chat, but i am not sure if it is wirking
>>> > fine in my computer. I am using 389ds 1.2.5, and i have found some
>>> > replication conflicts (nsds5replicaconflict=*). I have deleted them
>>> > manually, and now the databases in the other servers are busy all the
>>> > time, no matter if i restart the service in the source or target
>>> > servers (i must kill the target servers as they never stop), when the
>>> > replication agreement is launched again from the source server, the
>>> > replica is busy all the time. the last operation in the access log of
>>> > the replicated servers is the deletion of the object in conflict,
>>> > which never gets a result.
>>> Any thing in the errors log of the suppliers or the consumers?
>>> >
>>> > any idea?
>>> >
>>> > As other times, thanks in advance for your help.
>>> >
>>> 
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > 389 users mailing list
>>> > 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>>
>>> --
>>> 389 users mailing list
>>> 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>
>>
>>
>
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: flash on www.nbc.com

2010-03-08 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:46:57 -0600 (CST)
Michael Hennebry wrote:

> What makes this case different?

I don't know, but I suspect web developers have a big
EOVERTHINK problem where they check things they shouldn't
be checking and react to them in ways they shouldn't react.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Changing the DHCP address of a machine on my Local LAN

2010-03-08 Thread Frank Cox

On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 09:20 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> ATT super-experts charged me $29 for 20 minutes 

You have to pay for technical support?  Wow...  Both of the ISPs here
have toll free (and free of charge) technical support.  In fact, the one
that I do some occasional work for will even send me over to your house
to re-configure your computer or change your network card.  No charge to
the customer.  They will even provide you with a network card.
-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


FC12 livecd-iso-to-disk woes - now suicidal

2010-03-08 Thread T. Horsnell
dexter wrote:
> On 8 March 2010 10:35, T. Horsnell  wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm trying to make a USB version of the FC12 livecd.
>> I follow the instructions at:
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraLiveCD/USBHowTo
>>
>> and type (as root):
>>
>> # livecd-iso-to-disk --format --reset-mbr Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdc1
>>
>> but the resulting USB stick just gives me 'Boot Error' when I boot it.
>>
>> If I use the dd method:
>>
>> # dd if=Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso of=/dev/sdc bs=8M
>>
>> it boots correctly. I ultimately want a persistent-storage
>> area so the dd solution is no good for me.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
> try liveusb-creator then bugzilla :-)
> 
> ...dex

Well, I've so far tried all the suggestions (except bugzilla),
and *nothing* works. I must be doing something wrong.

On my FC9 with livecd-tools-0.17.3-1.fc9
Ive tried:
  livecd-iso-to-disk Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdc1
  livecd-iso-to-disk Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdc (required mkdosfs -I and 
mkfs.vfat -I)
  liveusb-creator Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso
and, thinking it might be a subtle difference in the iso structure,
I tried the same commands with Fedora-9-i686-Live.iso

They all failed with a 'Boot error'.

I then moved to my newly installed and updated FC12 system, with 
livecd-tools-031-1.fc12.1 and tried:
  livecd-iso-to-disk Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdb1
  livecd-iso-to-disk --format --reset-mbr Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdb1
  livecd-iso-to-disk --format --reset-mbr Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdb
  liveusb-creator Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso

These also failed in the same way.

The only thing that works is 'dd if=Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso of=/dev/sdb bs=8M'
and if it wasnt for this I would think either my memsticks or my bios were 
faulty.

If anyone out there has actually got this stuff to work on FC12, *please* would
you share the secrets. And if it failed, can we compare notes, and I'll file
a bug report.

Thanks,
Terry







-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: flash on www.nbc.com

2010-03-08 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Kevin Martin wrote:

> It appears, from what I've read, that it's an issue with NBC's website
> not detecting the Flash 10 version correctly (have seen this on other
> sites as well).  I've tried accessing the site in Chrome as well on
> Fedora 11 i386 with no success.

Thanks for the information.

Pardon my ignorance.
Why does it have to?
I'd thought that SOP was for clients to ask for information,
for web servers to provide it and for clients eat said information.
The server was not supposed to need to know what was asking.
Apparently not in this case.
What makes this case different?

-- 
Michael   henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"Pessimist: The glass is half empty.
Optimist:   The glass is half full.
Engineer:   The glass is twice as big as it needs to be."
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: flash on www.nbc.com

2010-03-08 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, Patrick Bartek wrote:

> --- On Sun, 3/7/10, Michael Hennebry  wrote:
>
>> Is there some trick to getting flash
>> to work through firefox?
>> When I click on a Chuck episode,
>> the peacock shows up and wiggles its tail, but that is all
>> that happens.
>> Zoom in works.
>> I've running FC 11.
>> About tells me that I'm running Adobe Flash Player
>> 10,0,45,2 .
>>
>> I can play flash on some sites.
>> On others, I can download and use mplayer.
>> On www.nbc.com, neither.
>
> 32 or 64-bit F11/Flash?

32-bit.  Pentium 4 with hyper-threading.

-- 
Michael   henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"Pessimist: The glass is half empty.
Optimist:   The glass is half full.
Engineer:   The glass is twice as big as it needs to be."
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: request

2010-03-08 Thread psmith
On 08/03/10 15:41, rajendra choudhary wrote:
> please...
> don,t send me further any mail..
if you look at the bottom of the mail you will see a line that says "To 
unsubscribe or change subscription options:" if you click the link below 
that you will be able to stop your subscription :)
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: [389-users] Busy replica when deleting replication conflict

2010-03-08 Thread Juan Asensio Sánchez
These are the messages when enabling replication logs:

[08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 op=11
repl="o=X,dc=X,dc=X": Replica in use locking_purl=conn=207283
id=3
[08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 op=11
replica="o=X,dc=X,dc=X": Unable to acquire replica: error:
replica busy locked by conn=207283 id=3 for incremental update
[08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 op=11
repl="o=X,dc=X,dc=X": StartNSDS50ReplicationRequest: response=1
rc=0
[08/Mar/2010:16:02:54 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 op=13
repl="o=X,dc=X,dc=X": Begin incremental protocol

These are all the messages in the access.log referring the connection
conn=207283

[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 fd=607 slot=607 SSL connection from
XX to XX
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 SSL 256-bit AES
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=0 BIND dn="cn=Replication
Manager,cn=config" method=128 version=3
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0
etime=0 dn="cn=replication manager,cn=config"
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=1 SRCH base="" scope=0
filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension"
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101
nentries=1 etime=0
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=2 SRCH base="" scope=0
filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension"
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=101
nentries=1 etime=0
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=3 EXT
oid="2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.3" name="Netscape Replication Start Session"
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=120
nentries=0 etime=0
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=4 DEL
dn="nsuniqueid=f851c101-1dd111b2-a64db547-e406+uid=cabudenhos029p$,ou=computers,o=XX,dc=XX,dc=XX"

And no more... As you can see, the replica is busy since 8:16 (now is 16:51,
in Spain). I am locked :S.


El 8 de marzo de 2010 16:44, Juan Asensio Sánchez escribió:

> At first sight, there are no messages neither in access or error logs, in
> supplier or consumers. Last modification operation in the busy
> replica/database is:
>
> [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=4 DEL
> dn="nsuniqueid=f851c101-1dd111b2-a64db547-e406+uid=cabudenhos029p$,ou=computers,o=XX,dc=XX,dc=XXX"
>
> which does not get any RESULT operation. I have just enabled replication
> logs in the consumer to see any messages. As soon i get them, i will post.
>
> Regards.
>
>
> 2010/3/8 Rich Megginson 
>
> Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:
>> > Hi all
>> >
>> > I have posted this on the chat, but i am not sure if it is wirking
>> > fine in my computer. I am using 389ds 1.2.5, and i have found some
>> > replication conflicts (nsds5replicaconflict=*). I have deleted them
>> > manually, and now the databases in the other servers are busy all the
>> > time, no matter if i restart the service in the source or target
>> > servers (i must kill the target servers as they never stop), when the
>> > replication agreement is launched again from the source server, the
>> > replica is busy all the time. the last operation in the access log of
>> > the replicated servers is the deletion of the object in conflict,
>> > which never gets a result.
>> Any thing in the errors log of the suppliers or the consumers?
>> >
>> > any idea?
>> >
>> > As other times, thanks in advance for your help.
>> > 
>> >
>> > --
>> > 389 users mailing list
>> > 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
>
>
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: [389-users] Busy replica when deleting replication conflict

2010-03-08 Thread Juan Asensio Sánchez
At first sight, there are no messages neither in access or error logs, in
supplier or consumers. Last modification operation in the busy
replica/database is:

[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=4 DEL
dn="nsuniqueid=f851c101-1dd111b2-a64db547-e406+uid=cabudenhos029p$,ou=computers,o=XX,dc=XX,dc=XXX"

which does not get any RESULT operation. I have just enabled replication
logs in the consumer to see any messages. As soon i get them, i will post.

Regards.


2010/3/8 Rich Megginson 

> Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I have posted this on the chat, but i am not sure if it is wirking
> > fine in my computer. I am using 389ds 1.2.5, and i have found some
> > replication conflicts (nsds5replicaconflict=*). I have deleted them
> > manually, and now the databases in the other servers are busy all the
> > time, no matter if i restart the service in the source or target
> > servers (i must kill the target servers as they never stop), when the
> > replication agreement is launched again from the source server, the
> > replica is busy all the time. the last operation in the access log of
> > the replicated servers is the deletion of the object in conflict,
> > which never gets a result.
> Any thing in the errors log of the suppliers or the consumers?
> >
> > any idea?
> >
> > As other times, thanks in advance for your help.
> > 
> >
> > --
> > 389 users mailing list
> > 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

request

2010-03-08 Thread rajendra choudhary
please...
don,t send me further any mail..
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: flash on www.nbc.com

2010-03-08 Thread Kevin Martin


On 03/08/2010 07:59 AM, Temlakos wrote:
> On 03/08/2010 01:35 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>   
>> --- On Sun, 3/7/10, Michael Hennebry  wrote:
>>
>>
>> 
>>> Is there some trick to getting flash
>>> to work through firefox?
>>> When I click on a Chuck episode,
>>> the peacock shows up and wiggles its tail, but that is all
>>> that happens.
>>> Zoom in works.
>>> I've running FC 11.
>>> About tells me that I'm running Adobe Flash Player
>>> 10,0,45,2 .
>>>
>>> I can play flash on some sites.
>>> On others, I can download and use mplayer.
>>> On www.nbc.com, neither.
>>>  
>>>   
>> 
It appears, from what I've read, that it's an issue with NBC's website
not detecting the Flash 10 version correctly (have seen this on other
sites as well).  I've tried accessing the site in Chrome as well on
Fedora 11 i386 with no success.

Kevin
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: [389-users] Busy replica when deleting replication conflict

2010-03-08 Thread Rich Megginson
Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have posted this on the chat, but i am not sure if it is wirking 
> fine in my computer. I am using 389ds 1.2.5, and i have found some 
> replication conflicts (nsds5replicaconflict=*). I have deleted them 
> manually, and now the databases in the other servers are busy all the 
> time, no matter if i restart the service in the source or target 
> servers (i must kill the target servers as they never stop), when the 
> replication agreement is launched again from the source server, the 
> replica is busy all the time. the last operation in the access log of 
> the replicated servers is the deletion of the object in conflict, 
> which never gets a result.
Any thing in the errors log of the suppliers or the consumers?
>
> any idea?
>
> As other times, thanks in advance for your help.
> 
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: Changing the DHCP address of a machine on my Local LAN

2010-03-08 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 21:13 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: 
> Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 15:22 -0600, Mikkel wrote: 
> >> On 03/06/2010 03:06 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> >>> I am not using my neighbors wireless. The machine is hard-wired to the
> >>> router but does not use the router as a DHCP server. It did until this
> >>> morning but now it does not. How does one change that behavior?
> >>>
> >> Check the configuration of the router. You can also try to reset the
> >> router. Outside of giving the machine a static IP address, there is
> >> not much you can do on the machine. This is NOT a problem with the
> >> Linux machine - it is a router problem.
> >>
> >> If you want to know why this is a router problem, find some good
> >> documentation on how DHCP works. The machine making the request
> >> responds to the first DHCP server that replies...
> >>
> >> Mikkel
> > 
> > I agree with your analysis of the problem. But that leaves us with the
> > following mystery.. There are 4 machines on the LAN. Why does only the
> > one get a response from the providers DHCP server first? Also why this
> > only occurred this morning after using the routers DHCP server for 6
> > months?
> 
> The obvious answer is that one machine is different in some way than the 
> others. 
> The backup guess would be that the DSL router is crap, doesn't reuse IP's, 
> and 
> after a period of time ran out. I bet the first.
There is no doubt it is different. Butt why did its behavior change
overnight. Actually it is the router configuration that changed
overnight. The router does reuse ips. Once the router was reconfigured
the ip of the affected machine and all the machines on the LAN returned
to the ones they had before the incident.

What makes me mad, however, is that the ATT super-experts charged me $29
for 20 minutes to not have the slightest idea what to do. And they
claimed to be experts on my 2wire router. Ultimately they wanted me to
buy another 2wire router for $99 from the local ATT store. 


--
===
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the
inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of misery. --
Churchill
===
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Fedora 12: Cannot boot with kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64

2010-03-08 Thread John Thompson
On 03/08/2010 03:32 AM, Fred Williams wrote:

> If all I need to do is try running without the proprietary NVidia
> driver,
> please let me know specifically how to disable that driver the easiest
> possible way. �Translation: so that I can just boot back into an older
> kernel and continue using the proprietary NVidia driver if I decide
> to do that.

In your /etc/X11/xorg.conf you need to change the driver from "nvidia"
(the proprietary driver) to "nv" (the open source driver).

Section "Device"
Identifier "Device0"
Driver "nvidia"  #  <= THIS LINE
VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation"
BoardName  "GeForce 6600 GT"
Option "AccelMethod" "XAA" # not EXA

BTW, what I do when I update the kernel is first boot into runlevel 3,
then build the proprietary driver modules, and then change to runlevel 5.

-- 

-John (j...@os2.dhs.org)
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Problem with an external usb HD - slow usb

2010-03-08 Thread Luigi Castro Cardeles
Hi list and Patrick,

the default max_sectors is 240. I change this to 1024 like you said but the
problem continue.

If i try the speed:

time dd if=/dev/sdc1 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=5
i get that speed: 972 MB/s

but if i run rsync, the upload transfer rate is very slow ( begins at 4MB/s
and goes below until 0.7KB/s)

[]'s
Luigi Castro Cardeles


2010/3/6 Patrick O'Callaghan 

> On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 11:05 -0300, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> >
> > I use fedora 12 on a dell inspiron 1545 laptop.
> > (2.6.31.12-174.2.22.fc12.x86_64).
> > i have a external usb hd and i can't make it connect like a usb 2.0
> > device.
> > this device is ntfs format
> >
> >
> > I check if the device is using ehci (dmesg after i plug the device)
> > [r...@localhost ~]# dmesg | grep USB
> > usb 2-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2
> >
> >
> > I check if this device is connected on a usb 2.0
> > [r...@localhost ~]# lsusb
> > Bus 008 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
> > Bus 002 Device 015: ID 0471:2021 Philips
> > Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
> >
> >
> > I mount the device with this options:
> > /dev/sdc1 on /media/hd_backup type fuseblk
> > (rw,nosuid,nodev,allow_other,blksize=4096)
> >
> >
> > but when i use cp, mv or rsync, the max speed i get is max 6MB/s (a
> > lot 800kB/s).
> > If i use this device on Windows (tested with Vista and Seven), i get
> > much high transfer rate.
> > I read about sync and async options, but if i put sync or async on
> > fstab, it does not alter the transfer rate.
> >
> >
> > Is this the normal upload transfer rate? I am doing something wrong?
>
> Try this as an experiment:
>
> echo 1024 > /sys/block/sdc/device/max_sectors
>
> and repeat your I/O measurement.
>
> poc
>
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: flash on www.nbc.com

2010-03-08 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 18:31 -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: 
> Is there some trick to getting flash to work through firefox?
> When I click on a Chuck episode,
> the peacock shows up and wiggles its tail, but that is all that happens.
> Zoom in works.
> I've running FC 11.
> About tells me that I'm running Adobe Flash Player 10,0,45,2 .
> 
> I can play flash on some sites.
> On others, I can download and use mplayer.
> On www.nbc.com, neither.
It is not you or the flash player. When I tried it. Law and Order played
but when I tried Chuck the behavior was the same as you saw. Just the
Peacock.


--
===
If you think things can't get worse it's probably only because you lack
sufficient imagination.
===
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Firewall config and ftp server

2010-03-08 Thread Edward. S. P. Leong
Dear All,

Our is fedora 11...

How can we enable the following of firewall function ( modules ), then
the ftp server is good for working ?

modprobe ip_tables
modprobe ip_nat_ftp
modprobe ip_conntrack
modprobe ip_conntrack_ftp

Due to trying the following cmd under fc 11:

[~]# modprobe ip_tables
WARNING: Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf, all config files
belong into /etc/modprobe.d/.
FATAL: Module ip_tables not found.
[~]#

Thanka !

Edward.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: [PHP] pear for fedora 11

2010-03-08 Thread Edward. S. P. Leong
Ashley Sheridan wrote:

>On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 01:07 +0800, Edward. S. P. Leong wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Dear All,
>>
>>Which can we download pear ann install into fc 11 system ?
>>
>>Thank for your help !
>>
>>Edward.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>I'm not sure I understand your question. Do you mean what Pear
>components can be installed on a Fedora 11 system? I'm running Fedora 11
>on my desktop and laptop at the moment, and both systems are running
>5.2.12, so any of the Pear modules that say they will run on that are
>fine. If you need to check to see what version of PHP is running, in a
>console or text login, type 'yum list php' and you'll get a line that
>reads something like:
>
>php.i5865.2.12-1.fc11@updates
>
>Thanks,
>Ash
>http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
>  
>
Dear Ash,

1, My means is where can we download the pear and install it into the
fedora 11 system ?
Due to our web server :
[pear]# pwd
/usr/share/pear
[pear]# dir
Archive data OS pearcmd.php peclcmd.php System.php XML
Console doc PEAR PEAR.php Structures test
[pear]#
So, it is not update ( pear ) ?

2, Would you mind to send me your php config ( php.ini ) and Web Server
config ( httpd.conf ) as sample ?
Due to our Web Server is problem :
After upload all of homepage data ( php format ) to Web Server, then
type "http://ip or domain_name" the result is blank page...

Thank for your help !

Edward.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: flash on www.nbc.com

2010-03-08 Thread Temlakos
On 03/08/2010 01:35 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> --- On Sun, 3/7/10, Michael Hennebry  wrote:
>
>
>> Is there some trick to getting flash
>> to work through firefox?
>> When I click on a Chuck episode,
>> the peacock shows up and wiggles its tail, but that is all
>> that happens.
>> Zoom in works.
>> I've running FC 11.
>> About tells me that I'm running Adobe Flash Player
>> 10,0,45,2 .
>>
>> I can play flash on some sites.
>> On others, I can download and use mplayer.
>> On www.nbc.com, neither.
>>  
> 32 or 64-bit F11/Flash?
>
> Doesn't work either with my 64-bit F12, 64-bit Flash 10.0 R45.  Won't play 
> Chuck through www.fancast.com either, because it gets it from Hulu  which has 
> problems with Linux 64-bit Flash though a browser, but not through its 
> Huludesktop app.  However, 32-bit OS and/or 32-bit Flash might work.
>
> I just checked using VirtualBox running Puppy Linux (32-bit) with the default 
> SeaMonkey browser.  NBC wouldn't work, but fancast did, even though the 
> display in Sea Monkey was shifted.  I have yet to install Firefox.  So, I 
> can't check it.
>
> B
>

Has this anything to do with why videos won't play on foxnews.com when I 
browse them in Firefox?

YouTube and other shared-service videos play fine, and so do the videos 
that I embed. But foxnews.com won't play at all.

Do I need a plugin to get it to work? Or do those videos not play nice 
with flashplayer?

Temlakos
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: FC12 livecd-iso-to-disk woes

2010-03-08 Thread dexter
On 8 March 2010 10:35, T. Horsnell  wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm trying to make a USB version of the FC12 livecd.
> I follow the instructions at:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraLiveCD/USBHowTo
>
> and type (as root):
>
> # livecd-iso-to-disk --format --reset-mbr Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdc1
>
> but the resulting USB stick just gives me 'Boot Error' when I boot it.
>
> If I use the dd method:
>
> # dd if=Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso of=/dev/sdc bs=8M
>
> it boots correctly. I ultimately want a persistent-storage
> area so the dd solution is no good for me.
>
> Any ideas?
>
try liveusb-creator then bugzilla :-)

...dex
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: this table in html how

2010-03-08 Thread Andrew Parker
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Roger  wrote:
> 6 columns, top row each block spanning 3 columns, bottom each block
> spanning 2.
>>> Why not do it as css and forget tables?
>>>
>>> Why don't you supply that solution?
>>>
> Send money and I will, I haven't got time to do it for free, busy
> designing a new site-  otherwise google and learn css.

i don't have to google it, i'm already well aware of how much of a
pain css is for this, and evidently so are you - no site redesign
necessary with my solution.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Fedora 12: no sound after switch users

2010-03-08 Thread Neil Bird

   Following on from another thread (in which gdm seemed to be stealing 
sound-ability from users), I've updated to the latest pulseuadio RPMs from 
updates-testing, and by situation seems to have gotten worse.

   (NB: this is fedora 12;  it was all working swimmingly in fedora 10, from 
which I upgraded a few weeks back).


   After a reboot, I log in.  I have sound, no problems AFAICT.  If I then 
switch users for my wife to log in (while I remain logged in), she gets no 
sound at all.

   A quick investigation shows that her PA config. has dropped back to a 
'dummy' output device.  I can switch back to my login and hear my sound 
again, but nothing i can do can get hers working again.

   I am utterly at a loss as to how to debug/diagnose pulseaudio, it's gone 
well beyond my ken;  can anyone help point me in the right direction?

   Here's the output of 'pulseaudio -vvv' :

https://www.fnxweb.co.uk/fnx/data/pa.out


   And the two log files generated by system-config-sound (or whatever it's 
called) run (as root) whilst logged in as my wife:

https://www.fnxweb.co.uk/fnx/data/scsconfig.log
https://www.fnxweb.co.uk/fnx/data/scsrun.log


   I did notice some failed device access in the pa.out file, namely 
"/dev/snd/pcmC7D0p", but that device isn't on my system.  I have:

drwxr-xr-x  2 root root   80 2010-03-07 16:41 by-id/
drwxr-xr-x  2 root root  100 2010-03-07 16:41 by-path/
crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116, 10 2010-03-07 16:41 controlC0
crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116, 14 2010-03-07 16:41 controlC1
crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116, 12 2010-03-07 16:41 controlC7
crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116,  9 2010-03-07 16:43 pcmC0D0c
crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116,  8 2010-03-07 16:45 pcmC0D0p
crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116,  7 2010-03-07 16:41 pcmC0D1c
crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116,  6 2010-03-07 16:41 pcmC0D2c
crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116,  5 2010-03-07 16:41 pcmC0D3c
crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116,  4 2010-03-07 16:43 pcmC0D4p
crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116, 13 2010-03-07 16:53 pcmC1D0c
crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116, 11 2010-03-07 16:53 pcmC7D0c
crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116,  3 2010-03-07 16:41 seq
crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116,  2 2010-03-07 16:41 timer

-- 
[n...@fnx ~]# rm -f .signature
[n...@fnx ~]# ls -l .signature
ls: .signature: No such file or directory
[n...@fnx ~]# exit
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Multi-wan setup, trying to build a script that ease setup, need help :)

2010-03-08 Thread Gabriel - IP Guys
Working on a multiwan script based on the page
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html 

 

You can find the script at http://pastie.org/859350 I'm trying to make
sure that the logic is correct, and that it'll work I think it would,
and ideas to make it a better script, feel free to throw them my way.

 

Look forward to hearing from you.

 

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Fedora 12: Cannot boot with kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64

2010-03-08 Thread Brian Millett
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 03:30 -0600, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> Hello Everyone
> The good news is that in my 10+ years using Linux, I am almost certain that 
> I have never had a kernel that would not boot...
> 
> Last night I ran "yum update" and it pulled in 
> kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64.  When I attempted to boot it, the boot 
> process seemed to complete, but X never started.
> 
> Since I have never had this problem before, I don't know precisely what 
> information that you need.
> 
> I am running an NVidia video card, with the proprietary NVidia driver, 
> installed from RPMFusion.  After failing to boot 
> kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64, I can reboot and choose another kernel and 
> it boots just fine.
> 
> >From /var/log/messages, this is the closest that I can find to anything 
> relevant:
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DRHD: handling fault status reg 102
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [03:00.0] 
> fault addr 233038000 
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DMAR:[fault reason 01] Present bit in 
> root entry is clear
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: NVRM: Xid (0003:00): 54, CMDre  
>   0001 0001
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DRHD: handling fault status reg 202
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [03:00.0] 
> fault addr 235833000 
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DMAR:[fault reason 01] Present bit in 
> root entry is clear
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: NVRM: Xid (0003:00): 6, PE007e 
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DRHD: handling fault status reg 302
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: NVRM: Xid (0003:00): 6, PE007e 
> 
> Again, I can boot fine from every other kernel.  I just can't boot from 
> 2.6.32.
> 
> If all I need to do is try running without the proprietary NVidia driver, 
> please let me know specifically how to disable that driver the easiest 
> possible way.  Translation: so that I can just boot back into an older 
> kernel and continue using the proprietary NVidia driver if I decide to do 
> that.
> 
> Also, not only have I never had a problem with being able to boot a 
> particular kernel, I have never had any problems with the proprietary 
> NVidia driver.
> 
> Let me know any additional information that you may need to help me with 
> this issue.
> 
> Steven P. Ulrick

I also had this issue, found a report that is you add

iommu=soft

to the kernel line in the menu.lst 

EXAMPLE:
title Fedora (2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64 ro  
root=UUID=a729b820-4928-4823-ba21-d4233410109c quiet vga=794 selinux=0 
iommu=soft
initrd /initramfs-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64.img


It worked for me.
-- 
Brian Millett - [ Garibaldi and Jack, "Revelations"]
"Look if I were you, I'd start talking straight because right now
you're in a whole world of trouble."
'You don't even know what trouble is... but you're gonna find out...
real soon.'



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: FC12 livecd-iso-to-disk woes

2010-03-08 Thread Steven I Usdansky




- Original Message 
> From: T. Horsnell 
> To: Community support for Fedora users 
> Sent: Mon, March 8, 2010 4:35:00 AM
> Subject: FC12 livecd-iso-to-disk woes
> 
> Hi all,
> I'm trying to make a USB version of the FC12 livecd.
> I follow the instructions at:
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraLiveCD/USBHowTo
> 
> and type (as root):
> 
> # livecd-iso-to-disk --format --reset-mbr Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdc1
> 
> but the resulting USB stick just gives me 'Boot Error' when I boot it.
> 
> If I use the dd method:
> 
> # dd if=Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso of=/dev/sdc bs=8M
> 
> it boots correctly. I ultimately want a persistent-storage
> area so the dd solution is no good for me.
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> Cheers,
> Terry

Scrolled through my /root/.bash_history to find this example:

livecd-iso-to-disk --format --noverify --overlay-size-mb 128 
/home/a/Desktop/Fedora-rawhide-Live-i386.iso /dev/sdg


  
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Fedora 12 Gnome-Desktop since last update very slow

2010-03-08 Thread Jürgen Dankoweit
Hello again,

Am 08.03.2010 10:09, schrieb Jürgen Dankoweit:
> Hello to the list,
> 
> since the last update - look at the protocol at the end of the mail -
> Fedora 12 Gnome-Desktop is very slow. Every action takes seconds before
> it is executed:
> (*) Opening a terminal window: 2 sec
> (*) In the terminal: su root and checking the password: three seconds
> (*) In the same terminal: ls /sbin: first nothing happens, then it
> scrolls the content of the directory line for line
> (*) Opening Thunderbird: 5 seconds a clear window, then a part of (*)
> (*) Thunderbird after 4 seconds the rest
> (*) scrolling in every application very slow
> (*) Starting of Compiz failed
> (*) Moving a window: the content of the window which is under that is
> restored line by line
> 
> Are there any problems with Xorg?
> Before this update, everything was very fast!
> 
> Thanks for your answers
> 

Now I have made additional tests:
(*) resume after suspend (suspend-to-RAM): before suspend the speed of
the graphical output is very good, after resume it is low.
(*) reboot: everything is ok
(*) logging off and logging in: the graphical output speed is terrible

Best regards
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: FC12 livecd-iso-to-disk woes

2010-03-08 Thread Don Quixote de la Mancha
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:35 AM, T. Horsnell  wrote:
> # livecd-iso-to-disk --format --reset-mbr Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdc1
>
> but the resulting USB stick just gives me 'Boot Error' when I boot it.

I haven't tried it myself, or looked at the livecd-iso-to-disk code,
but are you sure that you want /dev/sdc1 and not /dev/sdc?

/dev/sdc1 is the first partition on your third SCSI drive (which
includes USB storage).

/dev/sdc in your entire third SCSI drive.

Unless you write a boot sector to the first 512 bytes of /dev/sdc, you
will get exactly the error you are seeing.

Hope that helps,

Don Quixote
-- 
Don Quixote de la Mancha
quix...@dulcineatech.com
http://www.dulcineatech.com

   Dulcinea Technologies Corporation: Software of Elegance and Beauty.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


FC12 livecd-iso-to-disk woes

2010-03-08 Thread T. Horsnell
Hi all,
I'm trying to make a USB version of the FC12 livecd.
I follow the instructions at:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraLiveCD/USBHowTo

and type (as root):

# livecd-iso-to-disk --format --reset-mbr Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdc1

but the resulting USB stick just gives me 'Boot Error' when I boot it.

If I use the dd method:

# dd if=Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso of=/dev/sdc bs=8M

it boots correctly. I ultimately want a persistent-storage
area so the dd solution is no good for me.

Any ideas?

Cheers,
Terry









-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Fedora - IBM x3650x M2 - .iso

2010-03-08 Thread Jatin K
On 03/08/2010 03:44 PM, RAMAKISHOREBABU KOPPULA wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I want to install Fedora 12 on IBM x3650 M2 system (Config details: 2 
> quad-core Intel® 
>  
> Xeon® X5500 series with Intel QuickPath Interconnect (QPI) technology, 
> up to 2.93 GHz and up to 1333 MHz front-side bus). Which .iso file do 
> I need to download for this hardware?
>
> Thank you
>
> Kishore
x86_64 DVD


http://fedoramirror.hnsdc.com/releases/12/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-12-x86_64-DVD.iso

-- 
   °v°
  /(_)\
   ^ ^  Jatin Khatri
Registerd Linux user No #501175
www.counter.li.org
No M$

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Fedora - IBM x3650x M2 - .iso

2010-03-08 Thread Oliver Falk
Hi Kishore!

On 03/08/2010 11:14 AM, RAMAKISHOREBABU KOPPULA wrote:
> I want to install Fedora 12 on IBM x3650 M2 system (Config details: 2
> quad-core Intel®
> 
> Xeon® X5500 series with Intel QuickPath Interconnect (QPI) technology,
> up to 2.93 GHz and up to 1333 MHz front-side bus). Which .iso file do I
> need to download for this hardware?

The best is the x86_64 DVD (via Torrent):
http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/torrents//Fedora-12-x86_64-DVD.torrent

Best,
 -of

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Fedora - IBM x3650x M2 - .iso

2010-03-08 Thread RAMAKISHOREBABU KOPPULA
Hello everyone,

I want to install Fedora 12 on IBM x3650 M2 system (Config details: 2
quad-core 
Intel®Xeon®
X5500 series with Intel QuickPath Interconnect (QPI) technology, up to
2.93 GHz and up to 1333 MHz front-side bus). Which .iso file do I need to
download for this hardware?

Thank you

Kishore
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Fedora 12 Gnome-Desktop since last update very slow

2010-03-08 Thread Jürgen Dankoweit
Am 08.03.2010 10:53, schrieb Hiisi:
> 2010/3/8 Jürgen Dankoweit :
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Hello to the list,
>>
>> since the last update - look at the protocol at the end of the mail -
>> Fedora 12 Gnome-Desktop is very slow. Every action takes seconds before
>> it is executed:
>> (*) Opening a terminal window: 2 sec
>> (*) In the terminal: su root and checking the password: three seconds
>> (*) In the same terminal: ls /sbin: first nothing happens, then it
>> scrolls the content of the directory line for line
>> (*) Opening Thunderbird: 5 seconds a clear window, then a part of (*)
>> (*) Thunderbird after 4 seconds the rest
>> (*) scrolling in every application very slow
>> (*) Starting of Compiz failed
>> (*) Moving a window: the content of the window which is under that is
>> restored line by line
>>
>> Are there any problems with Xorg?
>> Before this update, everything was very fast!
>>
>> Thanks for your answers
>>
>> Here the protocol:
> <--SNIP-->
> 
> Dumb question: had you reboot your system after update?

Quick answer: yes

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Fedora 12 Gnome-Desktop since last update very slow

2010-03-08 Thread Hiisi
2010/3/8 Jürgen Dankoweit :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hello to the list,
>
> since the last update - look at the protocol at the end of the mail -
> Fedora 12 Gnome-Desktop is very slow. Every action takes seconds before
> it is executed:
> (*) Opening a terminal window: 2 sec
> (*) In the terminal: su root and checking the password: three seconds
> (*) In the same terminal: ls /sbin: first nothing happens, then it
> scrolls the content of the directory line for line
> (*) Opening Thunderbird: 5 seconds a clear window, then a part of (*)
> (*) Thunderbird after 4 seconds the rest
> (*) scrolling in every application very slow
> (*) Starting of Compiz failed
> (*) Moving a window: the content of the window which is under that is
> restored line by line
>
> Are there any problems with Xorg?
> Before this update, everything was very fast!
>
> Thanks for your answers
>
> Here the protocol:
<--SNIP-->

Dumb question: had you reboot your system after update?
-- 
Hiisi.
Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: http://counter.li.org/
--
Spandex is a privilege, not a right.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Fedora 12: Cannot boot with kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64

2010-03-08 Thread n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
On 03/08/2010 09:30 AM, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> Hello Everyone
> The good news is that in my 10+ years using Linux, I am almost certain that 
> I have never had a kernel that would not boot...
> 
> Last night I ran "yum update" and it pulled in 
> kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64.  When I attempted to boot it, the boot 
> process seemed to complete, but X never started.
> 
> Since I have never had this problem before, I don't know precisely what 
> information that you need.
> 
> I am running an NVidia video card, with the proprietary NVidia driver, 
> installed from RPMFusion.  After failing to boot 
> kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64, I can reboot and choose another kernel and 
> it boots just fine.
> 
>>From /var/log/messages, this is the closest that I can find to anything 
> relevant:
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DRHD: handling fault status reg 102
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [03:00.0] 
> fault addr 233038000 
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DMAR:[fault reason 01] Present bit in 
> root entry is clear
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: NVRM: Xid (0003:00): 54, CMDre  
>   0001 0001
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DRHD: handling fault status reg 202
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [03:00.0] 
> fault addr 235833000 
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DMAR:[fault reason 01] Present bit in 
> root entry is clear
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: NVRM: Xid (0003:00): 6, PE007e 
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DRHD: handling fault status reg 302
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: NVRM: Xid (0003:00): 6, PE007e 
> 
> Again, I can boot fine from every other kernel.  I just can't boot from 
> 2.6.32.
> 
> If all I need to do is try running without the proprietary NVidia driver, 
> please let me know specifically how to disable that driver the easiest 
> possible way.  Translation: so that I can just boot back into an older 
> kernel and continue using the proprietary NVidia driver if I decide to do 
> that.
> 
> Also, not only have I never had a problem with being able to boot a 
> particular kernel, I have never had any problems with the proprietary 
> NVidia driver.
> 
> Let me know any additional information that you may need to help me with 
> this issue.
> 
> Steven P. Ulrick

I have a similar problem on my laptop if I have hybrid SLi enabled. Take
a look at your BIOS settings and make sure only 1 graphics card is
enabled. As you state, booting to an earlier kernel does not have this
problem on my laptop either. Hope this helps.

JB
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Fedora 12: Cannot boot with kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64

2010-03-08 Thread Fred Williams
On 8 March 2010 09:30, Steven P. Ulrick  wrote:

> Hello Everyone
> The good news is that in my 10+ years using Linux, I am almost certain that
> I have never had a kernel that would not boot...
>
> Last night I ran "yum update" and it pulled in
> kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64.  When I attempted to boot it, the boot
> process seemed to complete, but X never started.
>
> Since I have never had this problem before, I don't know precisely what
> information that you need.
>
> I am running an NVidia video card, with the proprietary NVidia driver,
> installed from RPMFusion.  After failing to boot
> kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64, I can reboot and choose another kernel and
> it boots just fine.
>
> >From /var/log/messages, this is the closest that I can find to anything
> relevant:
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DRHD: handling fault status reg 102
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [03:00.0]
> fault addr 233038000
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DMAR:[fault reason 01] Present bit in
> root entry is clear
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: NVRM: Xid (0003:00): 54, CMDre 
>   0001 0001
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DRHD: handling fault status reg 202
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [03:00.0]
> fault addr 235833000
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DMAR:[fault reason 01] Present bit in
> root entry is clear
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: NVRM: Xid (0003:00): 6, PE007e
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DRHD: handling fault status reg 302
> Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: NVRM: Xid (0003:00): 6, PE007e
>
> Again, I can boot fine from every other kernel.  I just can't boot from
> 2.6.32.
>
> If all I need to do is try running without the proprietary NVidia driver,
> please let me know specifically how to disable that driver the easiest
> possible way.  Translation: so that I can just boot back into an older
> kernel and continue using the proprietary NVidia driver if I decide to do
> that.
>
> Also, not only have I never had a problem with being able to boot a
> particular kernel, I have never had any problems with the proprietary
> NVidia driver.
>
> Let me know any additional information that you may need to help me with
> this issue.
>
> Steven P. Ulrick
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>
In order to be certain, have you appended 'rdblacklist=nouveau' to the end
of the grub (assuming you're using grub) entry for that kernel? AFAIK it
does not boot correctly with the NVidia drivers without it.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Fedora 12: Cannot boot with kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64

2010-03-08 Thread Steven P. Ulrick
Hello Everyone
The good news is that in my 10+ years using Linux, I am almost certain that 
I have never had a kernel that would not boot...

Last night I ran "yum update" and it pulled in 
kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64.  When I attempted to boot it, the boot 
process seemed to complete, but X never started.

Since I have never had this problem before, I don't know precisely what 
information that you need.

I am running an NVidia video card, with the proprietary NVidia driver, 
installed from RPMFusion.  After failing to boot 
kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64, I can reboot and choose another kernel and 
it boots just fine.

>From /var/log/messages, this is the closest that I can find to anything 
relevant:
Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DRHD: handling fault status reg 102
Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [03:00.0] 
fault addr 233038000 
Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DMAR:[fault reason 01] Present bit in 
root entry is clear
Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: NVRM: Xid (0003:00): 54, CMDre  
  0001 0001
Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DRHD: handling fault status reg 202
Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [03:00.0] 
fault addr 235833000 
Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DMAR:[fault reason 01] Present bit in 
root entry is clear
Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: NVRM: Xid (0003:00): 6, PE007e 
Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: DRHD: handling fault status reg 302
Mar  8 03:01:56 localhost kernel: NVRM: Xid (0003:00): 6, PE007e 

Again, I can boot fine from every other kernel.  I just can't boot from 
2.6.32.

If all I need to do is try running without the proprietary NVidia driver, 
please let me know specifically how to disable that driver the easiest 
possible way.  Translation: so that I can just boot back into an older 
kernel and continue using the proprietary NVidia driver if I decide to do 
that.

Also, not only have I never had a problem with being able to boot a 
particular kernel, I have never had any problems with the proprietary 
NVidia driver.

Let me know any additional information that you may need to help me with 
this issue.

Steven P. Ulrick
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Fedora 12 Gnome-Desktop since last update very slow

2010-03-08 Thread Jürgen Dankoweit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hello to the list,

since the last update - look at the protocol at the end of the mail -
Fedora 12 Gnome-Desktop is very slow. Every action takes seconds before
it is executed:
(*) Opening a terminal window: 2 sec
(*) In the terminal: su root and checking the password: three seconds
(*) In the same terminal: ls /sbin: first nothing happens, then it
scrolls the content of the directory line for line
(*) Opening Thunderbird: 5 seconds a clear window, then a part of (*)
(*) Thunderbird after 4 seconds the rest
(*) scrolling in every application very slow
(*) Starting of Compiz failed
(*) Moving a window: the content of the window which is under that is
restored line by line

Are there any problems with Xorg?
Before this update, everything was very fast!

Thanks for your answers

Here the protocol:
Mar 07 11:43:29 Updated: xorg-x11-server-common-1.7.5-5.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:43:30 Installed:
xorg-x11-drv-ati-firmware-6.13.0-0.21.20100219gite68d3a389.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:43:32 Updated: kernel-firmware-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.noarch
Mar 07 11:43:38 Updated: kernel-headers-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:43:39 Updated: pulseaudio-gdm-hooks-0.9.21-5.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:43:43 Updated: sos-1.9-1.fc12.noarch
Mar 07 11:43:44 Updated: perf-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.noarch
Mar 07 11:43:48 Updated: pulseaudio-libs-0.9.21-5.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:43:51 Updated: GConf2-2.28.0-4.fc12.1.i686
Mar 07 11:44:43 Installed: kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:44:45 Updated: pulseaudio-0.9.21-5.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:44:47 Updated: pulseaudio-utils-0.9.21-5.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:44:48 Updated: file-libs-5.03-13.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:44:51 Updated: xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.7.5-5.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:44:52 Updated: pulseaudio-module-zeroconf-0.9.21-5.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:44:53 Updated: pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-0.9.21-5.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:44:54 Updated: pulseaudio-libs-glib2-0.9.21-5.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:44:55 Updated: pulseaudio-libs-zeroconf-0.9.21-5.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:44:57 Updated: gmime22-2.2.25-1.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:45:00 Updated: usermode-1.104-1.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:45:01 Updated: libmms-0.5-1.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:45:02 Updated: GConf2-gtk-2.28.0-4.fc12.1.i686
Mar 07 11:45:03 Updated: usermode-gtk-1.104-1.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:45:05 Updated: pulseaudio-module-x11-0.9.21-5.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:45:06 Updated: pulseaudio-module-gconf-0.9.21-5.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:45:07 Updated: GConf2-devel-2.28.0-4.fc12.1.i686
Mar 07 11:45:10 Updated: mlocate-0.22.2-2.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:45:11 Updated: info-4.13a-9.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:45:13 Updated: xorg-x11-server-Xnest-1.7.5-5.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:45:13 Updated: pulseaudio-esound-compat-0.9.21-5.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:45:15 Updated: sudo-1.7.2p5-1.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:45:17 Updated:
xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.13.0-0.21.20100219gite68d3a389.fc12.i686
Mar 07 11:45:18 Updated: file-5.03-13.fc12.i686

My Hardware:
IBM/Lenovo Thinkpad T43,
ATI Radeon X300 (RV370) 5B60 (PCIE) with RADEON: Driver for ATI Radeon
chipsets

XOrg:
X.Org X Server 1.7.5
Release Date: 2010-02-16
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: x86-05 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5
Current Operating System: Linux t43.juergendankoweit.net
2.6.32.9-67.fc12.i686 #1 SMP Sat Feb 27 10:00:02 UTC 2010 i686
Kernel command line: ro root=UUID=27547ae9-3737-4bd1-b859-0ebf6beb461f
noiswmd LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 KE
Build Date: 24 February 2010  09:15:30PM
Build ID: xorg-x11-server 1.7.5-5.fc12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAkuUvt4ACgkQP1cqIDNixQLOMAD/VLZUxP+9NIlFcz++ek/4vnMT
B89ir1JOsf3GfFdoOfcA+wQG1yqc84mAfO49LhGUI/Mbe5j7RicgyQQWINxNrHvR
=0SzX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines