Re: mplayer doesn't like me again
On 02/01/2011 09:43 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: >>From the command line I tried > xv: DRI failure, pixelation > gl_nosw: pixelation, but no DRI failure message > dga: mess > fbdev: cannot open /dev/fb, no video > xvidix: pci errors, no video > x11: DRI failure, pixelation > > dga: mess: > Movie-Aspect is undefined - no prescaling applied. > VO: [dga] 640x480 => 640x480 BGRA > vo_dga: DGA 2.0 available :-) Can switch resolution AND depth! > vo_dga: Selected hardware mode 640 x 480 @ 59 Hz @ depth 24, bitspp > 32. > vo_dga: Video parameters by codec: 640 x 480, depth 24, bitspp 32. > vo_dga: Framebuffer mapping failed!!! > FATAL: Cannot initialize video driver. > Too many buffered pts > In light of the above, I'm not sure I have a useable mode. > Considering that I have a rather high end video card, > 'twould be nice if I did. Let's start at the beginning: What is the output of "lspci | grep VGA" Also, what video driver are you using to drive it? (Check the output of /var/log/Xorg.0.log to be sure, but you could also look in your /etc/X11/xorg.conf file if you have one.) Finally, what is the result of "glxinfo | grep direct" That should tell me exactly which video "card" is in your machine, which video driver is being used, and whether or not DRI is being used. We can go from there. > I really hate the poke-it-and-see-what-it-does method. So do it. Lets get some facts straight first -- Kevin J. Cummings kjch...@verizon.net cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Slow Mirror: mirror.sr.unh.edu
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:32:28PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > I was trying to install OpenOffice.org on a fresh F14 machine and > encountered a very slow mirror (mirror.sr.unh.edu). Yum was averaging > 85kb/sec speed. The machine downloading can easily pull 25mbit/sec in a > speed test. Anyone else encountered this? > > The mirror's page says that they are only using 7% of their bandwidth, > so it doesn't seem like they're overloaded. I know Matt sometimes > frequents this list, so if you see this, this is an FYI. I'm getting about 100KBytes/sec from them too, from a few different places. I'll ask their admin. Thanks for the alert. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Slow Mirror: mirror.sr.unh.edu
On 02/01/2011 06:32 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > The mirror's page says that they are only using 7% of their bandwidth, > so it doesn't seem like they're overloaded. More likely than not, there's a bottleneck somewhere between you and them. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: httpd cannot connect via TLS to LDAP server after upgrade to fedora 14
On 1/31/11 2:14 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Ldap Tester wrote: >> I don't know if this is a problem with httpd's mod_authnz_ldap >> or its mod_ldap or with openldap, or just a configuration mistake >> on my part, but it used to work before the upgrade. >> I have searched all over for an answer to this problem >> because I can't believe that I am the only one having it, >> but I have found nothing. >> I welcome any ideas. > Fedora 14 had an undocumented feature where OpenLDAP switched from using > OpenSSL to NSS. NSS isn't a mature or bugfree library and each time core > utilities are switched to it (curl for example) NSS bugs spout their > ugly heads. I'm not sure where the drive to use NSS-for-everything comes > from, but that is for a separate thread. > I'll chime on this: OpenSSL is not FIPS-140 compliant and thus is being removed from the list of approved Federal Security Software products in the United States. NSS is on the list and thus can be used. James McKenzie -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: mplayer doesn't like me again
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 02/01/2011 01:40 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > >> Arrrg. >> I remembered that I didn't have nvidia, >> but I remembered the wrong name. >> I'm on my third video card. >> The first was a radeon. >> After I zapped that one, I had it replaced with >> an nvidia card because it had AGP and I could find it. >> Having cooked or otherwise damaged that one, >> I replaced it with a VisionTek Radeon HD 3650. >> Again was the AGP card I could find. >> I suspect that a Radeon wouldn't play well with a *nvidia.so . >>> What is in your /etc/mplayer/mplayer.conf file? It should show the vo >>> options it will try and use. Mine uses: >>> vo=xv,xvidix, >From mplayer -vo help: vdpau VDPAU with X11 xv X11/Xv gl_nosw OpenGL no software rendering x11 X11 ( XImage/Shm ) xover General X11 driver for overlay capable video output drivers sdl SDL YUV/RGB/BGR renderer (SDL v1.1.7+ only!) gl OpenGL gl2 X11 (OpenGL) - multiple textures version dga DGA ( Direct Graphic Access V2.0 ) fbdev Framebuffer Device fbdev2 Framebuffer Device matrixview MatrixView (OpenGL) aa AAlib cacalibcaca dxr3DXR3/H+ video out v4l2V4L2 MPEG Video Decoder Output xvidix X11 (VIDIX) cvidix console VIDIX nullNull video output xvmcXVideo Motion Compensation mpegpes MPEG-PES to DVB card yuv4mpegyuv4mpeg output for mjpegtools png PNG file jpegJPEG file gif89a animated GIF output tga Targa output pnm PPM/PGM/PGMYUV file md5sum md5sum of each frame >From the command line I tried xv: DRI failure, pixelation gl_nosw: pixelation, but no DRI failure message dga: mess fbdev: cannot open /dev/fb, no video xvidix: pci errors, no video x11: DRI failure, pixelation dga: mess: Movie-Aspect is undefined - no prescaling applied. VO: [dga] 640x480 => 640x480 BGRA vo_dga: DGA 2.0 available :-) Can switch resolution AND depth! vo_dga: Selected hardware mode 640 x 480 @ 59 Hz @ depth 24, bitspp 32. vo_dga: Video parameters by codec: 640 x 480, depth 24, bitspp 32. vo_dga: Framebuffer mapping failed!!! FATAL: Cannot initialize video driver. Too many buffered pts >> I'm at work, so I don't know for sure, >> Somewhere I think a saw a statement that mplayer would use a built-in list. >> The list was not specified. > > Without specifying a list (and after exhausting the modes in the list if > it ends with a ","), mplayer will go though all the modes in its own > order. Seem like vpdau is higher up on the list than the mode you need, > so it tries it before what you need. You might want to determine what > the video mode you need is and add it to your system's mplayer.conf file > so it finds it sooner. In light of the above, I'm not sure I have a useable mode. Considering that I have a rather high end video card, 'twould be nice if I did. I really hate the poke-it-and-see-what-it-does method. -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "Pessimist: The glass is half empty. Optimist: The glass is half full. Engineer: The glass is twice as big as it needs to be." -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Slow Mirror: mirror.sr.unh.edu
I was trying to install OpenOffice.org on a fresh F14 machine and encountered a very slow mirror (mirror.sr.unh.edu). Yum was averaging 85kb/sec speed. The machine downloading can easily pull 25mbit/sec in a speed test. Anyone else encountered this? The mirror's page says that they are only using 7% of their bandwidth, so it doesn't seem like they're overloaded. I know Matt sometimes frequents this list, so if you see this, this is an FYI. Michael -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Printing in 64-Bit Google-Chrome fails
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:15 PM, David wrote: > On 2/1/2011 9:00 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: >>> All of yours are not updated (they look way behind .. i mean way way >>> behind) ..this is the current unstable I have - just letting yum update >>> from the google repo: >>> >>> google-chrome-unstable-10.0.648.6-72589.x86_64 >> >> Yeah, after seeing your previous email I did some researching but >> didn't find anything wrong with my repo... I just did a "yum clean >> all" and I still see the same versions. >> >> My /etc/yum.repos.d/google.repo: >> [google] >> name=Google - i386 >> baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/rpm/stable/i386 >> enabled=1 >> gpgcheck=1 >> gpgkey=https://dl-ssl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub >> >> [google-testing] >> name=Google Testing - i386 >> baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/rpm/testing/i386 >> enabled=1 >> gpgcheck=1 >> >> [google64] >> name=Google - x86_64 >> baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/rpm/stable/x86_64 >> enabled=1 >> gpgcheck=1 >> gpgkey=https://dl-ssl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub >> >> >>> I'd force install fresh if I were you. Also I did not realized they >>> could be installed on top of each other interesting .. I only have >>> unstable. I thought they all ended up in same place (/opt/google/chrome). >> >> I've only got the one installed, the rest are just available packages. >> >> Richard > > > Go to the three links. Those repos are empty. No, not empty, just not directly browse-able. Output from "yum repolist" google Google - i386 5 google-chrome64Google Chrome 3 google-testing Google Testing - i386 1 google64 Google - x86_64 4 The numbers on the end are the number of packages in the repo. I do get updated packages from time to time, but they seem to lag horribly. Anyway I found the problem. My links go to the general google repo, not the chrome specific one. What's strange is if you do a google search on "google yum repo", the links you find tell you to use the information just like I have. I downloaded directly from the google website the latest google-chrome and opened the RPM archive and found the shell script that adds the chrome specific repo. Now I'm showing the newer software packages. # yum list google-chrome* Loaded plugins: changelog, presto, refresh-packagekit, remove-with-leaves, rpm- : warm-cache Installed Packages google-chrome-beta.x86_64 8.0.552.200-65749 @google64 Available Packages google-chrome-beta.i386 8.0.552.200-65749 google google-chrome-beta.x86_64 9.0.597.84-72991 google-chrome64 google-chrome-stable.i386 7.0.517.44-64615 google google-chrome-stable.x86_64 8.0.552.237-70801 google-chrome64 google-chrome-unstable.i386 9.0.576.0-65344google google-chrome-unstable.x86_64 10.0.648.11-73099 google-chrome64 I wonder if Google knows about this discrepancy? Thanks, Richard -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Printing in 64-Bit Google-Chrome fails
On 2/1/2011 9:00 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: >> On 02/01/2011 12:14 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> Interesting. I don't have 8.0 stable available for some reason... >>> >>> # yum list google-chrome\* >>> Loaded plugins: changelog, presto, refresh-packagekit, remove-with-leaves, >>> rpm- >>> : warm-cache >>> Installed Packages >>> google-chrome-beta.x86_648.0.552.200-65749 >>> @google64 >>> Available Packages >>> google-chrome-beta.i386 8.0.552.200-65749 >>> google >>> google-chrome-stable.i3867.0.517.44-64615 >>> google >>> google-chrome-stable.x86_64 7.0.517.44-64615 >>> google64 >>> google-chrome-unstable.i386 9.0.576.0-65344 >>> google >>> google-chrome-unstable.x86_649.0.576.0-65344 >>> google64 >>> >>> Where do you get yours from? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Richard >> >> All of yours are not updated (they look way behind .. i mean way way >> behind) ..this is the current unstable I have - just letting yum update >> from the google repo: >> >> google-chrome-unstable-10.0.648.6-72589.x86_64 > > Yeah, after seeing your previous email I did some researching but > didn't find anything wrong with my repo... I just did a "yum clean > all" and I still see the same versions. > > My /etc/yum.repos.d/google.repo: > [google] > name=Google - i386 > baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/rpm/stable/i386 > enabled=1 > gpgcheck=1 > gpgkey=https://dl-ssl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub > > [google-testing] > name=Google Testing - i386 > baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/rpm/testing/i386 > enabled=1 > gpgcheck=1 > > [google64] > name=Google - x86_64 > baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/rpm/stable/x86_64 > enabled=1 > gpgcheck=1 > gpgkey=https://dl-ssl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub > > >> I'd force install fresh if I were you. Also I did not realized they >> could be installed on top of each other interesting .. I only have >> unstable. I thought they all ended up in same place (/opt/google/chrome). > > I've only got the one installed, the rest are just available packages. > > Richard Go to the three links. Those repos are empty. -- David -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Printing in 64-Bit Google-Chrome fails
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 02/01/2011 12:14 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > Interesting. I don't have 8.0 stable available for some reason... >> >> # yum list google-chrome\* >> Loaded plugins: changelog, presto, refresh-packagekit, remove-with-leaves, >> rpm- >> : warm-cache >> Installed Packages >> google-chrome-beta.x86_64 8.0.552.200-65749 >> @google64 >> Available Packages >> google-chrome-beta.i386 8.0.552.200-65749 google >> google-chrome-stable.i386 7.0.517.44-64615 google >> google-chrome-stable.x86_64 7.0.517.44-64615 >> google64 >> google-chrome-unstable.i386 9.0.576.0-65344 google >> google-chrome-unstable.x86_64 9.0.576.0-65344 >> google64 >> >> Where do you get yours from? >> >> Thanks, >> Richard > > All of yours are not updated (they look way behind .. i mean way way > behind) ..this is the current unstable I have - just letting yum update > from the google repo: > > google-chrome-unstable-10.0.648.6-72589.x86_64 Yeah, after seeing your previous email I did some researching but didn't find anything wrong with my repo... I just did a "yum clean all" and I still see the same versions. My /etc/yum.repos.d/google.repo: [google] name=Google - i386 baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/rpm/stable/i386 enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=https://dl-ssl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub [google-testing] name=Google Testing - i386 baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/rpm/testing/i386 enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 [google64] name=Google - x86_64 baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/rpm/stable/x86_64 enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=https://dl-ssl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub > I'd force install fresh if I were you. Also I did not realized they > could be installed on top of each other interesting .. I only have > unstable. I thought they all ended up in same place (/opt/google/chrome). I've only got the one installed, the rest are just available packages. Richard -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Printing in 64-Bit Google-Chrome fails
On 02/01/2011 07:40 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > > google-chrome-unstable-10.0.648.6-72589.x86_64 Sorry - make that google-chrome-unstable-10.0.648.11-73099.x86_64 > As for printing - there is a bug I know about in which any pull down menu buttons on websites - print black instead of whatever is written/selected for that item. This is for all versions - its being fixed (may have been already I haven't checked in a while). This is with unstable - which I find the best choice for me at the moment - including full support for cert management (which was introduced in 10.0). gene -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Printing in 64-Bit Google-Chrome fails
On 02/01/2011 12:14 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: nteresting. I don't have 8.0 stable available for some reason... > > # yum list google-chrome\* > Loaded plugins: changelog, presto, refresh-packagekit, remove-with-leaves, > rpm- > : warm-cache > Installed Packages > google-chrome-beta.x86_648.0.552.200-65749 > @google64 > Available Packages > google-chrome-beta.i386 8.0.552.200-65749 google > google-chrome-stable.i3867.0.517.44-64615 google > google-chrome-stable.x86_64 7.0.517.44-64615 > google64 > google-chrome-unstable.i386 9.0.576.0-65344 google > google-chrome-unstable.x86_649.0.576.0-65344 > google64 > > Where do you get yours from? > > Thanks, > Richard All of yours are not updated (they look way behind .. i mean way way behind) ..this is the current unstable I have - just letting yum update from the google repo: google-chrome-unstable-10.0.648.6-72589.x86_64 I'd force install fresh if I were you. Also I did not realized they could be installed on top of each other interesting .. I only have unstable. I thought they all ended up in same place (/opt/google/chrome). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 New Installation: Unknown Monitor
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 00:30:26 -0400, > Burkhard Plache wrote: >> Hello Fellow Users, >> >> after installing F14, the monitor resolution defaults to 960x600, >> whereas my BenQ FP 757 has 1280 x 1024. There must be some >> interface (or driver?) problem, since Preferences->Monitor does not >> allow me to change to the desired resolution. I did not find any hints >> on how to proceed in the docs.fedoraproject.org F14 installation guide. > > Does that monitor do proper EDID? If not you'll need to use an xorg.conf > file to add mode lines for it. Appreciate the response. I do not know how to find out if the monitor does proper EDID. Can I query manually? After reading up on this type of problem, there seem to be difficulties getting xorg.conf utilized by X11. Currently, xorf.conf does not exist on my system. Burkhard -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 New Installation: Unknown Monitor
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 00:30:26 -0400, Burkhard Plache wrote: > Hello Fellow Users, > > after installing F14, the monitor resolution defaults to 960x600, > whereas my BenQ FP 757 has 1280 x 1024. There must be some > interface (or driver?) problem, since Preferences->Monitor does not > allow me to change to the desired resolution. I did not find any hints > on how to proceed in the docs.fedoraproject.org F14 installation guide. Does that monitor do proper EDID? If not you'll need to use an xorg.conf file to add mode lines for it. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Help coming up to speed
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 16:54:47 -0700, don fisher wrote: > > level. What are the switches that can be included on the kernel command > line? Is there any way to control Plymouth so that the commands are > visible and one drops to a login prompt at the end? What is upstart Yes. Remove rhgb and quiet from the parameters and add 3 to boot into run level 3. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
RE: zfs works in fedora
>ls zfs working in fedora? Can you share? Last night, I installed zfs on fedora 14 as shown on http://zfsonlinux.org/ . You have to download the files and create & install rpms. Not too hard, but not simple. After installation, I shared the zfs volume using samba, and copied several large files over my network, (1 to 4 gigabytes each) and I was very happy with the write performance. A few months ago, I tried installing ZFS-FUSE on centos 5.5 and the write performance was very poor. However, it worked a little nicer when creating pools with zpool. In the end, if you must use zfs I think it's best to make and install the rpms from zfsonlinux.org, but use yum to install the rpms or yum will complain. I think I'm going to stick with the ext4 file system for my own servers... -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: mplayer doesn't like me again
On 02/01/2011 01:40 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > Arrrg. > I remembered that I didn't have nvidia, > but I remembered the wrong name. > I'm on my third video card. > The first was a radeon. > After I zapped that one, I had it replaced with > an nvidia card because it had AGP and I could find it. > Having cooked or otherwise damaged that one, > I replaced it with a VisionTek Radeon HD 3650. > Again was the AGP card I could find. > I suspect that a Radeon wouldn't play well with a *nvidia.so . Yes, AFAIK, vdpau support is only for nVidia cards. Buts, its really nice support. If you ever seem full HD running on an nVidia netbook and an ATOM processor, its awesome! vdpau support means you don't need a honking CPU to be able to display full HD anymore. That's why when I bought my last motherboard (which came with an builtin Radeon HD chipset) I also bought an nVidia GT210 PCI-E video card: for the VDPAU support. It works great! (OK, The AMD Phenom X4 processor probably helps too!) But, enough advocating for nVidia > As noted above, I remembered the wrong name. > By the time I got around to posting a message, > my brain was too scrambled to take the hint. > >>> from mplayer -V, the last lineis >>> vo: x11 uninit called but X11 not initialized.. >> >> Yeah, I get this message from both my laptop and my desktop. The former >> has an ATI chipset, the latter an nVidia one. >> >> What is in your /etc/mplayer/mplayer.conf file? It should show the vo >> options it will try and use. Mine uses: >> >> vo=xv,xvidix, > > I'm at work, so I don't know for sure, > Somewhere I think a saw a statement that mplayer would use a built-in list. > The list was not specified. Without specifying a list (and after exhausting the modes in the list if it ends with a ","), mplayer will go though all the modes in its own order. Seem like vpdau is higher up on the list than the mode you need, so it tries it before what you need. You might want to determine what the video mode you need is and add it to your system's mplayer.conf file so it finds it sooner. > Thank you for your help and your patience. np -- Kevin J. Cummings kjch...@verizon.net cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: mplayer doesn't like me again
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Mogens Kjaer wrote: > On 02/01/2011 05:50 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> Any ideas? > > Do you have an old config file hanging around in ~/.mplayer ? Sort of. It's empty. > Try renaming ~/.mplayer and start mplayer again. -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "Pessimist: The glass is half empty. Optimist: The glass is half full. Engineer: The glass is twice as big as it needs to be." -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: mplayer doesn't like me again
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 01/31/2011 11:50 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> It doesn't tell me my computer is too slow, >> it just gives me a rather pixelated image. >> People look like there made of burlap. >> >> The output from mplayer has two things >> that look like error messages to me. >> >>> Failed to open VDPAU backend libvdpau_nvidia.so: cannot open shared >>> object file: No such file or directory >>> [vdpau] Error when calling vdp_device_create_x11: 1 >> >> and >> >>> [VD_FFMPEG] DRI failure.0.051 ct: -0.030 0/ 0 ??% ??% ??,?% 0 0 >> >> I don't even know why it looks for VDPAU. >> I have a GeForce card. > > That depends on *which* GeForce card you have. vdpau will only help you > if you have a GeForce 6 series card or later *and* are running with the > nvidia driver. The more later, the more it can help you. If you are > using nouveau or nv, you can't benefit from vdpau support. Arrrg. I remembered that I didn't have nvidia, but I remembered the wrong name. I'm on my third video card. The first was a radeon. After I zapped that one, I had it replaced with an nvidia card because it had AGP and I could find it. Having cooked or otherwise damaged that one, I replaced it with a VisionTek Radeon HD 3650. Again was the AGP card I could find. I suspect that a Radeon wouldn't play well with a *nvidia.so . >> Presumably things would go badly if it found libvdpau_nvidia.so . >> >> Once upon a time, I knew what DRI failure meant, >> but I've forgotten and googling turns up questions but no answers. > > DRI = Direct Rendering Infrastructure. It is the main support for 3D > acceleration in X11 these days. In the video world, DRM is the Direct > Rendering Manager. Wikipedia is your friend. > >> /var/log/Xorg.0.log includes, among other things: >> >>> [ 86356.565] Dac detection success >>> [ 86356.565] (II) RADEON(0): Output: DVI-0, Detected Monitor Type: 0 >>> [ 86356.565] Unhandled monitor type 0 >>> [ 86356.565] (II) RADEON(0): EDID for output DVI-0 > > Whoa! This looks like you have a Radeon card of some sort. Radeon is > made by AMD these days (used to be ATI). GeForce is made by nVidia. Yup. As noted above, I remembered the wrong name. By the time I got around to posting a message, my brain was too scrambled to take the hint. >> from mplayer -V, the last lineis >> >>> vo: x11 uninit called but X11 not initialized.. > > Yeah, I get this message from both my laptop and my desktop. The former > has an ATI chipset, the latter an nVidia one. > > What is in your /etc/mplayer/mplayer.conf file? It should show the vo > options it will try and use. Mine uses: > > vo=xv,xvidix, I'm at work, so I don't know for sure, Somewhere I think a saw a statement that mplayer would use a built-in list. The list was not specified. > and I don't have those problems The man page for mplayer for video > output options. You can override by using the -vo command line option. > See what works best for you. > >> Any ideas? Thank you for your help and your patience. -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "Pessimist: The glass is half empty. Optimist: The glass is half full. Engineer: The glass is twice as big as it needs to be." -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Fedora 14: Shutdown problem
Terry Barnaby beam.ltd.uk> writes: > ... > Note I am using the "network" not "NetworkManager" service. The NetworkManager > service does not work well for me with systems using networked /home and > other file systems. > ... Looks like the reason for this is: # ls /etc/rc0.d/* ... S00killall S01halt # cat /etc/rc0.d/S00killall ... # Networking could be needed for NFS root. [ $subsys = network ] && continue ... The NetworkManager is set in /var/lock/subsys/NetworkManager but it is not skipped as well, so the network is brought down. Next, the halt script is executed that will try to unmount external fs shares (e.g. nfs), and of course will fail. The fix: # Networking could be needed for NFS root. [ $subsys = NetworkManager ] && continue Will that make you use NetworkManager now ? :-) JB -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
qemu-system-sparc64 is not available from the yum repository?
Hello, qemu-system-sparc64 is not available from the yum repository? Could it be compiled in? Thanks. Regards, H Xu 02/02/2011 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Printing in 64-Bit Google-Chrome fails
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Max Pyziur wrote: > On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Richard Shaw wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Max Pyziur wrote: >>> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> I am now favoring Google Chrome over Firefox and Galeon; I use both on my >>> i386 Dell Laptop and 64Bit Desktop. From either Galeon or Firefox on both >>> machines printing functions correctly. >>> >>> Using Google-Chrome, printing functions correctly on the i386 laptop, but >>> fails on the 64Bit desktop (it prints multiple pages of occasional >>> gibberish). >>> >>> Any suggestions? >> >> What version are you running? stable? beta? unstable? >> >> I run the beta right from their yum repo and have very few issues. > > My only issue is printing in the 64bit version; otherwise, I'm a quiet > cheerleader. > > On both 64bit and i386 machines I've installed the latest stable release > by way of yum/rpm: > google-chrome-stable-8.0.552.237-70801.x86_64 Interesting. I don't have 8.0 stable available for some reason... # yum list google-chrome\* Loaded plugins: changelog, presto, refresh-packagekit, remove-with-leaves, rpm- : warm-cache Installed Packages google-chrome-beta.x86_648.0.552.200-65749 @google64 Available Packages google-chrome-beta.i386 8.0.552.200-65749 google google-chrome-stable.i3867.0.517.44-64615 google google-chrome-stable.x86_64 7.0.517.44-64615 google64 google-chrome-unstable.i386 9.0.576.0-65344 google google-chrome-unstable.x86_649.0.576.0-65344 google64 Where do you get yours from? Thanks, Richard -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Printing in 64-Bit Google-Chrome fails
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Max Pyziur wrote: >> >> >> Greetings, >> >> I am now favoring Google Chrome over Firefox and Galeon; I use both on my >> i386 Dell Laptop and 64Bit Desktop. From either Galeon or Firefox on both >> machines printing functions correctly. >> >> Using Google-Chrome, printing functions correctly on the i386 laptop, but >> fails on the 64Bit desktop (it prints multiple pages of occasional >> gibberish). >> >> Any suggestions? > > What version are you running? stable? beta? unstable? > > I run the beta right from their yum repo and have very few issues. My only issue is printing in the 64bit version; otherwise, I'm a quiet cheerleader. On both 64bit and i386 machines I've installed the latest stable release by way of yum/rpm: google-chrome-stable-8.0.552.237-70801.x86_64 fyi, Max Pyziur p...@brama.com > Richard > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: bash question
On 02/01/2011 05:23 AM, fedora wrote: > dirname $0 > > suomi > > On 2011-02-01 13:03, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 14:49 -0700, compdoc wrote: Is there a bash command that tells an executing script what *its* path is? >>> >>> echo $PWD >> >> No, that just tells where it was executed from. The OP wants to know >> where the script actually lives. >> >> poc >> The value of $0 on a Linux system will be the full path to where the script was found, so 'dirname $0' works. However, bash runs on other OS's (Solaris for one), and Solaris does not provide the full path in $0, you only get the name of the script. So be careful if you're writing code that needs to be portable. -- Bob McGowan -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Printing in 64-Bit Google-Chrome fails
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Max Pyziur wrote: > > > Greetings, > > I am now favoring Google Chrome over Firefox and Galeon; I use both on my > i386 Dell Laptop and 64Bit Desktop. From either Galeon or Firefox on both > machines printing functions correctly. > > Using Google-Chrome, printing functions correctly on the i386 laptop, but > fails on the 64Bit desktop (it prints multiple pages of occasional > gibberish). > > Any suggestions? What version are you running? stable? beta? unstable? I run the beta right from their yum repo and have very few issues. Richard -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Printing in 64-Bit Google-Chrome fails
Greetings, I am now favoring Google Chrome over Firefox and Galeon; I use both on my i386 Dell Laptop and 64Bit Desktop. From either Galeon or Firefox on both machines printing functions correctly. Using Google-Chrome, printing functions correctly on the i386 laptop, but fails on the 64Bit desktop (it prints multiple pages of occasional gibberish). Any suggestions? Much thanks, Max Pyziur p...@brama.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: outout format of time command
On 02/01/2011 04:27 AM, Rick Sewill wrote: > On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 04:13:20 am Adel ESSAFI wrote: >> Hello, >> I have followed the man page of time commande to put a certain output >> format. >> However, time command does not recognise -f option. >> >> Could you help please. >> >> >> >> [adel@localhost generateInstance]$ time -f "%e" ls >> bash: -f: command not found > > There are two separate time commands. > > One is a bash built-in. > To set the format for this time, please set the environment variable, > TIMEFORMAT. Please do "info bash" and search for TIMEFORMAT. > > The other is the time command described by "man time". > To use this time command, please do $(which time) -f "%e" ls > On my system, $(which time) happens to be /usr/bin/time > so I can also do /usr/bin/time -f "%e" ls Quoting a command, even quoting must one character of the command name, will bypass the shell's builtin version: $ \time -f %e sleep 2 2.00 $ -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: [389-users] pronunciation of 389
On 02/01/2011 06:34 AM, jean-Noël Chardron wrote: > hello, > > What is the English pronunciation of 389 directory server > Is it three, eight, nine, or three hundred eighty nine or something else ? I use "three eight nine" and "three eighty-nine" - in English, "three eighty-nine" usually means "three hundred eighty-nine", unless you're talking about money, then it means $3.89. > > thanks, > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: Sony Laptop Sound Problem -- original thread: output format of time command
On 02/01/2011 02:39 PM, John Pilkington wrote: > On 01/02/11 10:35, Apurva Tripathi wrote: >> Hello , >> I have sony vaio laptop I am running fedora 14 now but it > I wonder if you have PulseAudio Volume Control active? breaking a thread with a new subject and question is a crime, as already mentioned by POC. answering such a crime is a compounding of the felony. using 'text/html' when one should use 'text/plain' is a misdemeanor. -- peace out. tc.hago, g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today. ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it. to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
[389-users] Export/import with 389 DS 1.2.7.5
Hi, I have a working MM setup and I exported my db with db2ldif.pl with the -r option: db2ldif.pl -D 'cn=Directory Manager' -w password -n userRoot -r -a /tmp/db_replica.ldif The errors file do not indicate an issue: [01/Feb/2011:09:23:59 -0500] - Beginning export of 'userRoot' [01/Feb/2011:09:23:59 -0500] - export userRoot: Processed 1000 entries (10%). [01/Feb/2011:09:23:59 -0500] - export userRoot: Processed 2000 entries (21%). [01/Feb/2011:09:23:59 -0500] - export userRoot: Processed 3000 entries (32%). [01/Feb/2011:09:24:00 -0500] - export userRoot: Processed 4000 entries (43%). [01/Feb/2011:09:24:00 -0500] - export userRoot: Processed 5000 entries (54%). [01/Feb/2011:09:24:00 -0500] - export userRoot: Processed 6000 entries (65%). [01/Feb/2011:09:24:00 -0500] - export userRoot: Processed 7000 entries (76%). [01/Feb/2011:09:24:00 -0500] - export userRoot: Processed 8000 entries (87%). [01/Feb/2011:09:24:00 -0500] - export userRoot: Processed 9000 entries (98%). [01/Feb/2011:09:24:00 -0500] - export userRoot: Processed 9160 entries (100%). [01/Feb/2011:09:24:00 -0500] - Export finished. and the ldif file itself looks fine to me as well. Then, I tried to import the ldif file with ldif2db.pl -D 'cn=Directory Manager' -w password -n userRoot -i /tmp/db_replica.ldif This fails with the following errors log: [01/Feb/2011:09:29:45 -0500] - Bringing userRoot offline... [01/Feb/2011:09:29:45 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - multimaster_be_state_change: replica o=umc is going offline; disabling replication [01/Feb/2011:09:29:46 -0500] - entrycache_clear_int: there are still 1 entries in the entry cache. :/ [01/Feb/2011:09:29:49 -0500] - WARNING: Import is running with nsslapd-db-private-import-mem on; No other process is allowed to access the database [01/Feb/2011:09:29:49 -0500] - import userRoot: Beginning import job... [01/Feb/2011:09:29:49 -0500] - import userRoot: Index buffering is disabled. [01/Feb/2011:09:29:49 -0500] - import userRoot: Processing file "/tmp/db_replica.ldif" [01/Feb/2011:09:29:49 -0500] - BAD CACHE ASSERTION at ../ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/cache.c/883: e->ep_refcnt > 0 Any idea, what is going on there. Thanks, -Reinhard -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: Sony Laptop Sound Problem
On 01/02/11 10:35, Apurva Tripathi wrote: > Hello , > I have sony vaio laptop I am running fedora 14 now but it > have the same problem as fedora 13 that is no sound. No sound come when it > turns on or when we try to play music or movie anything related to sound is > not getting sound through speaker or headphones. I found a solution through > Intel HDA analyser but that is not permanent. Every time I reboot my system > I have to do it Again. The solution is by running HDA analyser go to the > node 0x19 and turn the VIZ to HIZ ! > > Help me.. > > Apurva Tripathi > alonemay...@gmail.com > > I wonder if you have PulseAudio Volume Control active? It's in my KDE Multimedia folder. John P -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: bash question
dirname $0 suomi On 2011-02-01 13:03, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 14:49 -0700, compdoc wrote: >>> Is there a bash command that tells an executing script what *its* path is? >> >> echo $PWD > > No, that just tells where it was executed from. The OP wants to know > where the script actually lives. > > poc > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
CC'ing to fedora-l...@redhat.com (was "where is the gedit dictionary?")
On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 @00:38 zulu, Frank Cox scribed: > gedit uses aspell for its spelling checker > > http://aspell.net/ I believe the fedora-l...@redhat.com address has been deprecated... But cc'ing to fedora-l...@redhat.com AND still results in 2 copies in the digest. It looks like only 1 copy is stored in the web archive; I'm not certain about the email list itself. (?) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Sony Laptop Sound Problem
Please do not hijack threads. When you have a new topic, start a new thread instead of replying to an existing one. Changing the Subject is not enough. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
RE: bash question
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 14:49 -0700, compdoc wrote: > > Is there a bash command that tells an executing script what *its* path is? > > echo $PWD No, that just tells where it was executed from. The OP wants to know where the script actually lives. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Sony Laptop Sound Problem
Hello , I have sony vaio laptop I am running fedora 14 now but it have the same problem as fedora 13 that is no sound. No sound come when it turns on or when we try to play music or movie anything related to sound is not getting sound through speaker or headphones. I found a solution through Intel HDA analyser but that is not permanent. Every time I reboot my system I have to do it Again. The solution is by running HDA analyser go to the node 0x19 and turn the VIZ to HIZ ! Help me.. Apurva Tripathi alonemay...@gmail.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: outout format of time command
On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 04:13:20 am Adel ESSAFI wrote: > Hello, > I have followed the man page of time commande to put a certain output > format. > However, time command does not recognise -f option. > > Could you help please. > > > > [adel@localhost generateInstance]$ time -f "%e" ls > bash: -f: command not found There are two separate time commands. One is a bash built-in. To set the format for this time, please set the environment variable, TIMEFORMAT. Please do "info bash" and search for TIMEFORMAT. The other is the time command described by "man time". To use this time command, please do $(which time) -f "%e" ls On my system, $(which time) happens to be /usr/bin/time so I can also do /usr/bin/time -f "%e" ls signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: outout format of time command
Try specifying the full pathname for time /usr/bin/time otherwise you'll be using bash's builtin Cheers, Terry > > > Hello, > I have followed the man page of time commande to put a certain output > format. > However, time command does not recognise -f option. > > Could you help please. > > > > [adel@localhost generateInstance]$ time -f "%e" ls > bash: -f: command not found > > real0m0.001s > user0m0.000s > sys0m0.000s > [adel@localhost generateInstance]$ > > > -- > PhD candidate in Computer Science > Address > 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 > Tunisia > tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) > fax: +216 71 391 166 > > > > -- > PhD candidate in Computer Science > Address > 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 > Tunisia > tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) > fax: +216 71 391 166 > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
outout format of time command
Hello, I have followed the man page of time commande to put a certain output format. However, time command does not recognise -f option. Could you help please. [adel@localhost generateInstance]$ time -f "%e" ls bash: -f: command not found real0m0.001s user0m0.000s sys0m0.000s [adel@localhost generateInstance]$ -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
outout format of time command
Hello, I have followed the man page of time commande to put a certain output format. However, time command does not recognise -f option. Could you help please. [adel@localhost generateInstance]$ time -f "%e" ls bash: -f: command not found real0m0.001s user0m0.000s sys0m0.000s [adel@localhost generateInstance]$ -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
