Re: [SOVLED by '!' ]how to specify IP not equal to in iptables rules ????
On Saturday 16 July 2011 10:18 AM, g wrote: > On 07/16/2011 04:25 AM, Jatin K wrote: > <> > >> Sorry, that was my mistake :-( > that happens. but does make things difficult to help. > >> actually I got the solution what was needed, from this list. > and was so noted. wherein, a little more info would be nice. > > did blocking work with; > >[1] iptables -A INPUT ! -s 172.16.158.111 -p tcp --dport 21 -j DROP > or >[2] iptables -A INPUT -s ! 172.16.158.111 -p tcp --dport 21 -j DROP > > syntax tends to indicate that [2] is correct, as [1] would tend to > indicate "NOT source". > [2] worked for me ...by the way we need to indicate ! like '!' ( in single quote) iptables -A INPUT -s '!' 172.16.158.111 -p tcp --dport 21 -j DROP -- °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Jatin Khatri Registerd Linux user No #501175 www.counter.li.org No M$ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: NM_CONTROLLED=no not working
On Friday, July 15, 2011 08:14:43 PM Rick Sewill wrote: > On Friday, July 15, 2011 02:48:53 PM Ian Pilcher wrote: > > I feel like I'm losing my mind. Can someone confirm that this is > > supposed to work before I bugzilla this? > > > > I am trying to get NetworkManager to ignore my wireless adapter (while > > still managing my Ethernet adapter and VPN connections). I have created > > > > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0: > >DEVICE=wlan0 > >TYPE=Wireless > >HWADDR=00:23:14:12:C1:38 > >NM_CONTROLLED=no > > Does the following work? > NM_CONTROLLED="no" It was a long shot if NM_CONTROLLED="no" works...documentation indicates NM_CONTROLLED=no should work. I think what you have should work too Documentation says one must have the correct HWADDR address. Looking at your followup emails, it appears you have the correct HWADDR address. Another long shot...documentation suggests you can have HWADDR=00:23:14:12:C1:38 as you have...but as an experiment, please put quotes around the MAC address HWADDR="00:23:14:12:C1:38" Why am I asking for quotes around things? I'm not sure how NetworkManager "reads" ifcfg-wlan0. It may have internal routines for reading the file -or- it may use a shell (like the bash shell) to read ifcfg-wlan0. I believe the non-NetworkManager network has scripts in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts that use the bash shell to read ifcfg-wlan0. I am trying to guess what syntax might make NetworkManager and non-NetworkManager happy. To tell the truth, what you have should work. I just want to rule out this possibility. Another line of questions. What is in /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf? I have the following: rsewill@rsewill:~ <3:1> $ more /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf [main] plugins=ifcfg-rh According to the documentation, man NetworkManager.conf, on a Redhat/Fedora system, one might have plugins=ifcfg-rh and/or keyfile If one has both, the order the plugins are listed matters. For example, do you have plugins=ifcfg-rh -or- plugins=keyfile -or- plugins=ifcfg-rh,keyfile -or- plugins=keyfile,ifcfg-rh? Ideally you will say you have plugins=ifcfg-rh and we still won't have an idea what is wrong. It's a possibility that needs to be ruled out. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: [SOVLED by '!' ]how to specify IP not equal to in iptables rules ????
On 07/16/2011 04:25 AM, Jatin K wrote: <> > Sorry, that was my mistake :-( that happens. but does make things difficult to help. > actually I got the solution what was needed, from this list. and was so noted. wherein, a little more info would be nice. did blocking work with; [1] iptables -A INPUT ! -s 172.16.158.111 -p tcp --dport 21 -j DROP or [2] iptables -A INPUT -s ! 172.16.158.111 -p tcp --dport 21 -j DROP syntax tends to indicate that [2] is correct, as [1] would tend to indicate "NOT source". -- peace out. tc.hago, g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today. ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it. to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it. ** The installation instructions stated to install Windows 2000 or better. So I installed Linux. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: [SOVLED by '!' ]how to specify IP not equal to in iptables rules ????
On Friday 15 July 2011 07:49 PM, g wrote: > On 07/15/2011 09:46 AM, Jatin K wrote: >> On Friday 15 July 2011 03:10 PM, James Hogarth wrote: '!' Solved my problem >>> Really? Because what you have there is the opposite of that which you >>> stated you were trying to accomplish in your first post. >>> >>> Now that IP is the only IP that can access your FTP server and all >>> others get dropped. >>> >> yes and thats what I wanted , Only specified IP can ftp to the server > --- > > > which is not what you stated in your first post, which was; > > }> I want to deny a particular IP (172.16.158.111) address in my network to > }> FTP on server (RHEL6), I'm trying to add the following[1][2] iptabls > }> rules on server and getting error [3] > Sorry, that was my mistake :-( actually I got the solution what was needed , from this list . -- °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Jatin Khatri Registerd Linux user No #501175 www.counter.li.org No M$ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: [SOVLED by '!' ]how to specify IP not equal to in iptables rules ????
On Friday 15 July 2011 03:22 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 15.07.2011 11:46, schrieb Jatin K: >> On Friday 15 July 2011 03:10 PM, James Hogarth wrote: '!' Solved my problem >>> Really? Because what you have there is the opposite of that which you >>> stated you were trying to accomplish in your first post. >>> >>> Now that IP is the only IP that can access your FTP server and all >>> others get dropped. >>> >> yes and thats what I wanted , Only specified IP can ftp to the server > why do you not say this at the begin > > sorry, but first open a port and after that drop all except > one ip is a really ugly style no one should do in production I do not have any control over that decision , I've to have do the things as per company's requirement. I'm the service provider , my duty is to provide setup as per direction and documentations given by my customer ( company ) > why do you not simply open the port only for the ip you want? > and this way you can open fro 2, 3, 4 IPs later if I would have control over the setup, I definitely go with your said solution. > iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s source-ip --dport 21 -j ACCEPT > thanks for you suggestions and help Warm Regards T.C. -- °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Jatin Khatri Registerd Linux user No #501175 www.counter.li.org No M$ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Hard drive/Laptop swap - will fedora croak?
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 20:31:25 -0400 Gary Waters wrote: > I set up a Fedora 15 installation on a laptop with an intel based chipset. I > just got an AMD ( Turion ) chipset notebook. I assume swapping the hard drive > will result in the fedora installation crashing? If such is the case, other > than a fresh install, is there a way to do it which will work? I don't think there is any way to know for sure other than try it and see what happens, but I know when I swapped my AMD based motherboard for an Intel I was pleasantly surprised to find everything working when I booted up off then same old disk. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: An elementary question on LANs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/15/2011 07:09 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Digimer wrote: > >>> What exactly sets up the correspondence between interfaces and LANs, >>> eg (in my case) eth1 <-> 192.168.2.0 ? >>> >>> I don't see any file in /etc/sysconfig , say, >>> where this is specified. >> >> It's mapped using 'HWADDR' in the >> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX and/or in >> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules. > > As far as I can see, 70-persistent-net.rules just maps > each MAC address on a machine to an interface, > as also does ifcfg-ethX . > > Neither seems to me to associate an interface, say eth1, > to a LAN, say 192.168.2.0 . > >> > http://wiki.alteeve.com/index.php/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_EL6_and_Fedora_12%2B > > I'll study that, thanks. > Guys, he wants to know where the IP address is set, not what determines what interface is eth1. Now, this could be done a couple of ways. If eth1 is set to get its information from a DHCP server, then it is not set on your machine at all, but is given by the DHCP server. If you have a static IP address, then I would look in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1. You should also have other configurations in the network-scripts directory. ifcfg-eth0 is the configuration for eth0. If you want to know what all the options are, you may want to read /usr/share/doc/initscripts-9.20.2/sysconfig.txt Mikkel - -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4g5wsACgkQqbQrVW3JyMR3TACeMc1BPS3bLYVD9xt0Ax4Kru6Y TKsAoIAmATyM+UsOqIjQJA6Kyn6aa5+i =hlRf -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: NM_CONTROLLED=no not working
On Friday, July 15, 2011 02:48:53 PM Ian Pilcher wrote: > I feel like I'm losing my mind. Can someone confirm that this is > supposed to work before I bugzilla this? > > I am trying to get NetworkManager to ignore my wireless adapter (while > still managing my Ethernet adapter and VPN connections). I have created > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0: > >DEVICE=wlan0 >TYPE=Wireless >HWADDR=00:23:14:12:C1:38 >NM_CONTROLLED=no > Does the following work? NM_CONTROLLED="no" -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Hard drive/Laptop swap - will fedora croak?
Gary Waters writes: « HTML content follows » I set up a Fedora 15 installation on a laptop with an intel based chipset. I just got an AMD ( Turion ) chipset notebook. I assume swapping the hard drive will result in the fedora installation crashing? If such is the case, other than a fresh install, is there a way to do it which will work? It's unlikely that any drastic actions will be needed. Fedora will boot just fine. The only situation where Fedora won't boot would be if you move a 64 bit Fedora install onto a system with a 32 bit CPU, of course. The most you will have to do is to reconfigure a few things. Fedora keeps stuff like network configuration settings associated for each device. When you boot the new hardware, Fedora will likely see a new network device, so you may need to refiddle your network settings. Audio might need some manual reconfiguration too. X.org is of sufficiently robust shape that it will come up on any new hardware that it supports without any issues. Of course the video hardware in your new laptop must be supported by X.org. If you're using Nvidia's or AMD's binary blob drivers, all bets are off, who knows what they will do. pgpGhmSA4wh6A.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Hard drive/Laptop swap - will fedora croak?
On 07/15/2011 05:31 PM, Gary Waters wrote: I set up a Fedora 15 installation on a laptop with an intel based chipset. I just got an AMD ( Turion ) chipset notebook. I assume swapping the hard drive will result in the fedora installation crashing? If such is the case, other than a fresh install, is there a way to do it which will work? Usually the biggest problem (at least in my experience) is with sata drivers. The trick is to run mkinitrd and force it to include the correct module for the new motherboard (old one should be included by default, so there's practically no way to mess this up) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Hard drive/Laptop swap - will fedora croak?
On 07/15/2011 08:31 PM, Gary Waters wrote: > I set up a Fedora 15 installation on a laptop with an intel based > chipset. I just got an AMD ( Turion ) chipset notebook. I assume > swapping the hard drive will result in the fedora installation crashing? > If such is the case, other than a fresh install, is there a way to do it > which will work? > > Gary > > I suspect it will work unless you have a 64 bit kernel and the newer on is only 32 bit. You may need to fiddle with networking again as the mac addresses probably changed ... -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Hard drive/Laptop swap - will fedora croak?
I set up a Fedora 15 installation on a laptop with an intel based chipset. I just got an AMD ( Turion ) chipset notebook. I assume swapping the hard drive will result in the fedora installation crashing? If such is the case, other than a fresh install, is there a way to do it which will work? Gary -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: An elementary question on LANs
Digimer wrote: >> What exactly sets up the correspondence between interfaces and LANs, >> eg (in my case) eth1 <-> 192.168.2.0 ? >> >> I don't see any file in /etc/sysconfig , say, >> where this is specified. > > It's mapped using 'HWADDR' in the > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX and/or in > /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules. As far as I can see, 70-persistent-net.rules just maps each MAC address on a machine to an interface, as also does ifcfg-ethX . Neither seems to me to associate an interface, say eth1, to a LAN, say 192.168.2.0 . > http://wiki.alteeve.com/index.php/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_EL6_and_Fedora_12%2B I'll study that, thanks. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Can't send email
On 07/15/2011 02:34 PM, Vinny wrote: > I do get window that ask for password, and I enter password, then a second > window appears "Unable to authenticate to SMTP server. > Bad authentication response from server" Have you considered asking your email provider's tech support? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Can't send email
On 07/15/2011 12:18 PM, james tate wrote: > On 07/15/2011 03:14 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 07/13/2011 04:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> sure that you are using the same MUA and same authentication methods? >>> ssl settings (STARTTLS or SSL on Port 465) are the same? >> You might (as I do) have to use SMTPAUTH on Port 587. > Joe, what is the exact command I would have to use ? First, you check with your email provider to find out if the password is sent insecurely or encrypted and make sure what port it's using. Then, you go through Edit->Account Settings->Outgoing Server (SMTP) then select your server and Edit. Change the Port Number to the one you were told and set the various settings below it to match what you were told then click OK. The first time you try to send, you'll get a pop-up box to put in your password, and there should be a checkbox to Save it. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: NM_CONTROLLED=no not working
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 20:10:38 -0300 Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 07/15/2011 05:58 PM, Tom H wrote: > > Does NM ignore it if you add "ONBOOT=yes"? (Or "ONBOOT=no" if you want > > to bring it up manually.) > > Nope. (I actually had ONBOOT=no in there. I took it out in hopes that > would help.) I had same problem and simply turned off NetworkManager. I wanted to use wlan0 as an access point (with hostapd), not a wi-fi client, but every time I plugged in the USB dongle, NM would come along and grab it and interfere with my hostapd setup. I have never yet been able to leave NetworkManager enabled on any of my systems. It always winds up screwing up something, and it is vastly simpler to fix the problems by turning it off and going back to network. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: NM_CONTROLLED=no not working
On 07/15/2011 05:58 PM, Tom H wrote: > Does NM ignore it if you add "ONBOOT=yes"? (Or "ONBOOT=no" if you want > to bring it up manually.) Nope. (I actually had ONBOOT=no in there. I took it out in hopes that would help.) -- Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com "If you're going to shift my paradigm ... at least buy me dinner first." -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Fedora 15 won't do automatic updates
On 07/15/2011 04:49 PM, James Bridge wrote: > Using Fedora 15 with Gnome 3 I can only get updates manually, either > with Yum or Software Update. That works fine but it is supposed to check > for updates automatically and it doesn't. The options are set using > "Software Updates" (note the final s!) and I have it set to check daily, > for all updates. Nothing happens. Why not? Me, too. And I've also got yum-updatesd running (in notify only mode). It, too, never reports anything. -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Fedora 15 won't do automatic updates
Using Fedora 15 with Gnome 3 I can only get updates manually, either with Yum or Software Update. That works fine but it is supposed to check for updates automatically and it doesn't. The options are set using "Software Updates" (note the final s!) and I have it set to check daily, for all updates. Nothing happens. Why not? -- James Bridge -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Can't send email
From: james tate > On 07/13/2011 07:35 PM, Vincent Onelli wrote: > > Hello, > > I am having problem sending email, receiving is OK but sending keeping > > at asking for password because can't authenticate. > > The set up is identical to my laptop which work OK, I rechecked > > several times, I also redone the set up few times. The OS is F15 > > any of you good people have some suggestion? Vinny. > Are you using Thunderbird to send mail ? > > I find when you send a email a window will open for your email password > and it is is hidden down behind any open window where you can't see it, > and your email won't send until your SMTP gets it's email password. > - > I do get window that ask for password, and I enter password, then a second window appears "Unable to authenticate to SMTP server. Bad authentication response from server" I am sending this email from the same computer using Kmail, however, I would like to go back to Evolution if it can be fixed. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: NM_CONTROLLED=no not working
2011/7/15 Ian Pilcher : > On 07/15/2011 05:08 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: >> >> Can you confirm (iwconfig) that the device is indeed called wlan0? > > [ipilcher@localhost ~]$ cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0 > DEVICE=wlan0 > TYPE=Wireless > HWADDR=00:23:14:12:C1:38 > NM_CONTROLLED=no Does NM ignore it if you add "ONBOOT=yes"? (Or "ONBOOT=no" if you want to bring it up manually.) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Remote Desktop in F15 & Gnome 3
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:45 +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > On 06/30/2011 10:24 PM, Andy Theuninck wrote: > > I want to turn on desktop sharing, but the menu options listed in the > > documentation no longer exist. This is the document I'm looking at: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User_Guide_-_Sharing_Your_Desktop > > The preferences applet is still there - it's in the "Other" category in the > applications menu, "Remote Desktop" (or just start typing "remote" in the menu > view). > > > Alternately, if there's a way to tweak /etc/sysconfig/vncservers to > > use x0vncserver instead of Xvnc, that would probably accomplish what I > > want. According to the man pages, the two programs take pretty much > > identical arguments, but the vncserver wrapper script used by init > > doesn't have any obvious options for switching backends. > > The integrated gnome stuff uses the vino server. > > Regards, > Bryn. I am assuming your talking about Gnome3, since there is no: System->Preferences->Internet and Network->Remote Desktop option on Gnome2. -- === "I'm not a god, I was misquoted." -- Lister, Red Dwarf === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: NM_CONTROLLED=no not working
On 07/15/2011 05:08 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > >Can you confirm (iwconfig) that the device is indeed called wlan0? > >Perhaps its a different name. > [ipilcher@localhost ~]$ cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0 DEVICE=wlan0 TYPE=Wireless HWADDR=00:23:14:12:C1:38 NM_CONTROLLED=no [ipilcher@localhost ~]$ ifconfig wlan0 wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:23:14:12:C1:38 inet addr:10.192.53.204 Bcast:10.192.55.255 Mask:255.255.252.0 inet6 addr: fe80::223:14ff:fe12:c138/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:17347 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:19046 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:10596012 (10.1 MiB) TX bytes:3456668 (3.2 MiB) [ipilcher@localhost ~]$ iwconfig wlan0 wlan0 IEEE 802.11abgn ESSID:"Red Hat Guest" Mode:Managed Frequency:2.412 GHz Access Point: 00:26:0B:16:34:54 Bit Rate=54 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off Power Management:off Link Quality=69/70 Signal level=-41 dBm Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0 Tx excessive retries:8 Invalid misc:409 Missed beacon:0 [ipilcher@localhost ~]$ nmcli dev list iface wlan0 GENERAL.DEVICE: wlan0 GENERAL.TYPE: 802-11-wireless GENERAL.DRIVER: iwlagn GENERAL.HWADDR: 00:23:14:12:C1:38 GENERAL.STATE: connected CAPABILITIES.CARRIER-DETECT:no CAPABILITIES.SPEED: 54 Mb/s WIFI-PROPERTIES.WEP:yes WIFI-PROPERTIES.WPA:yes WIFI-PROPERTIES.WPA2: yes WIFI-PROPERTIES.TKIP: yes WIFI-PROPERTIES.CCMP: yes AP1.SSID: 'HP85722C' AP1.BSSID: 02:21:01:FD:3D:F8 AP1.MODE: Ad-Hoc AP1.FREQ: 2457 MHz AP1.RATE: 11 MB/s AP1.SIGNAL: 20 AP1.SECURITY: AP1.ACTIVE: no AP2.SSID: 'HPEEBEA3' AP2.BSSID: 02:21:C1:12:13:0E AP2.MODE: Ad-Hoc AP2.FREQ: 2457 MHz AP2.RATE: 11 MB/s AP2.SIGNAL: 27 AP2.SECURITY: AP2.ACTIVE: no AP3.SSID: 'SMK' AP3.BSSID: 00:14:BF:B6:BF:B9 AP3.MODE: Infrastructure AP3.FREQ: 2437 MHz AP3.RATE: 54 MB/s AP3.SIGNAL: 25 AP3.SECURITY: WPA2 AP3.ACTIVE: no AP4.SSID: 'HP50116B' AP4.BSSID: 02:29:A9:EC:12:50 AP4.MODE: Ad-Hoc AP4.FREQ: 2457 MHz AP4.RATE: 11 MB/s AP4.SIGNAL: 27 AP4.SECURITY: AP4.ACTIVE: no AP5.SSID: 'Cadec' AP5.BSSID: 00:16:B6:2E:8C:28 AP5.MODE: Infrastructure AP5.FREQ: 2412 MHz AP5.RATE: 54 MB/s AP5.SIGNAL: 24 AP5.SECURITY: WEP AP5.ACTIVE: no AP6.SSID: 'TOTAL' AP6.BSSID: D8:5D:4C:C2:AF:0C AP6.MODE: Infrastructure AP6.FREQ: 2442 MHz AP6.RATE: 54 MB/s AP6.SIGNAL: 24 AP6.SECURITY: WEP AP6.ACTIVE: no AP7.SSID: 'NALCO' AP7.BSSID: 00:1D:71:09:B4:30 AP7.MODE: Infrastructure AP7.FREQ: 2412 MHz AP7.RATE: 54 MB/s AP7.SIGNAL: 19 AP7.SECURITY: WPA WPA2 Enterprise AP7.ACTIVE: no AP8.SSID: 'IMarket' AP8.BSSID: 00:02:6F:91:71:D9 AP8.MODE: Infrastructure AP8.FREQ: 2422 MHz AP8.RATE: 54 MB/s AP8.SIGNAL: 25 AP8.SECURITY: WPA AP8.ACTIVE: no AP9.SSID: 'HP8BAF53' AP9.BSSID: 02:25:05:D2:65:C9 AP9.MODE: Ad-Hoc AP9.FREQ: 2457 MHz AP9.RATE: 11 MB/s AP9.SIGNAL: 27 AP9.SECURITY: AP9.ACTIVE: no AP10.SSID: 'IMarket' AP10.BSSID: 00:02:6F:91:71:D5 AP10.MODE: Infrastructure AP10.FREQ: 2417 MHz AP10.RATE: 54 MB/s AP10.SIGNAL:29 AP10.SECURITY: WPA AP10.ACTIVE:
Re: NM_CONTROLLED=no not working
On 07/15/2011 03:48 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > >DEVICE=wlan0 >TYPE=Wireless >HWADDR=00:23:14:12:C1:38 >NM_CONTROLLED=no > > Even after rebooting, however, NetworkManager is still taking control of > wlan0. > > Can you confirm (iwconfig) that the device is indeed called wlan0? Perhaps its a different name. gene/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Getting Thunderbird to open Links in Email
On 07/15/2011 03:33 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 15:31 -0400, james tate wrote: >> On 07/15/2011 02:49 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 14:13 -0400, james tate wrote: FC15 How do I get thunderbird to select Firefox when opening links in Emails. When clicking on Links in Emails nothing is happening. I can't find in Thunderbird Preferences a way to select Firefox. >>> It's not a Thunderbird preference, it's a desktop preference. If you use >>> Gnome, look under the settings panel. If on KDE you still have to use >>> the Gnome settings since TBird is a Gnome app. In that case, run >>> gnome-control-panel from the Shell and look for Preferred Applications. >>> >>> poc >>> >> Patrick I can't find gnome-control-panel in the fc15 repos. > It's gnome-control-center. Sorry, I keep getting that wrong. > > poc > Thanks for the help Patrick. Ran gnome-control-center, and under /System/System Info/Default Applications I made the changes and it is working normal in Thunderbird now. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
NM_CONTROLLED=no not working
I feel like I'm losing my mind. Can someone confirm that this is supposed to work before I bugzilla this? I am trying to get NetworkManager to ignore my wireless adapter (while still managing my Ethernet adapter and VPN connections). I have created /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0: DEVICE=wlan0 TYPE=Wireless HWADDR=00:23:14:12:C1:38 NM_CONTROLLED=no Even after rebooting, however, NetworkManager is still taking control of wlan0. So who is crazy, me or the computer? :-| Thanks! (This Fedora 15 with NetworkManager-0.8.9997-5.git20110702.fc15.x86_64, BTW.) -- Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com "If you're going to shift my paradigm ... at least buy me dinner first." -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: An elementary question on LANs
On 07/15/2011 03:09 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 07/15/2011 03:00 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> What exactly sets up the correspondence between interfaces and LANs, >> eg (in my case) eth1 <-> 192.168.2.0 ? >> >> I don't see any file in /etc/sysconfig , say, >> where this is specified. > > It's mapped using 'HWADDR' in the > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX and/or in > /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules. > And in some machines (if not changed elsewhere somehow) biosdevname may be used - I believe it is now included in F15 ... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ConsistentNetworkDeviceNaming gene -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Getting Thunderbird to open Links in Email
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 15:10 -0400, james tate wrote: > On 07/15/2011 02:49 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 14:13 -0400, james tate wrote: > >> FC15 > >> > >> How do I get thunderbird to select Firefox when opening links in Emails. > >> > >> When clicking on Links in Emails nothing is happening. > >> > >> I can't find in Thunderbird Preferences a way to select Firefox. > > It's not a Thunderbird preference, it's a desktop preference. If you use > > Gnome, look under the settings panel. If on KDE you still have to use > > the Gnome settings since TBird is a Gnome app. In that case, run > > gnome-control-panel from the Shell and look for Preferred Applications. > > > > poc > > > In KDE it's Settings/Default Applications/Web Browser and my is set to > firefox, > but it still won't open and use Firefox. > > There is a execute file in /usr/bin/firefox > To repeat: TBird is a *Gnome* app. It doesn't care about KDE settings. Stupid but true. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Getting Thunderbird to open Links in Email
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 15:31 -0400, james tate wrote: > On 07/15/2011 02:49 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 14:13 -0400, james tate wrote: > >> FC15 > >> > >> How do I get thunderbird to select Firefox when opening links in Emails. > >> > >> When clicking on Links in Emails nothing is happening. > >> > >> I can't find in Thunderbird Preferences a way to select Firefox. > > It's not a Thunderbird preference, it's a desktop preference. If you use > > Gnome, look under the settings panel. If on KDE you still have to use > > the Gnome settings since TBird is a Gnome app. In that case, run > > gnome-control-panel from the Shell and look for Preferred Applications. > > > > poc > > > Patrick I can't find gnome-control-panel in the fc15 repos. It's gnome-control-center. Sorry, I keep getting that wrong. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Getting Thunderbird to open Links in Email
On 07/15/2011 02:49 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 14:13 -0400, james tate wrote: >> FC15 >> >> How do I get thunderbird to select Firefox when opening links in Emails. >> >> When clicking on Links in Emails nothing is happening. >> >> I can't find in Thunderbird Preferences a way to select Firefox. > It's not a Thunderbird preference, it's a desktop preference. If you use > Gnome, look under the settings panel. If on KDE you still have to use > the Gnome settings since TBird is a Gnome app. In that case, run > gnome-control-panel from the Shell and look for Preferred Applications. > > poc > Patrick I can't find gnome-control-panel in the fc15 repos. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Can't send email
On 07/15/2011 03:14 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 07/13/2011 04:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> sure that you are using the same MUA and same authentication methods? >> ssl settings (STARTTLS or SSL on Port 465) are the same? > You might (as I do) have to use SMTPAUTH on Port 587. Joe, what is the exact command I would have to use ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Can't send email
On 07/13/2011 04:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > sure that you are using the same MUA and same authentication methods? > ssl settings (STARTTLS or SSL on Port 465) are the same? You might (as I do) have to use SMTPAUTH on Port 587. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Getting Thunderbird to open Links in Email
On 07/15/2011 02:49 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 14:13 -0400, james tate wrote: >> FC15 >> >> How do I get thunderbird to select Firefox when opening links in Emails. >> >> When clicking on Links in Emails nothing is happening. >> >> I can't find in Thunderbird Preferences a way to select Firefox. > It's not a Thunderbird preference, it's a desktop preference. If you use > Gnome, look under the settings panel. If on KDE you still have to use > the Gnome settings since TBird is a Gnome app. In that case, run > gnome-control-panel from the Shell and look for Preferred Applications. > > poc > In KDE it's Settings/Default Applications/Web Browser and my is set to firefox, but it still won't open and use Firefox. There is a execute file in /usr/bin/firefox -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: An elementary question on LANs
On 07/15/2011 03:00 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > What exactly sets up the correspondence between interfaces and LANs, > eg (in my case) eth1 <-> 192.168.2.0 ? > > I don't see any file in /etc/sysconfig , say, > where this is specified. It's mapped using 'HWADDR' in the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX and/or in /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules. http://wiki.alteeve.com/index.php/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_EL6_and_Fedora_12%2B -- Digimer E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com Freenode handle: digimer Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org "At what point did we forget that the Space Shuttle was, essentially, a program that strapped human beings to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math?" -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
An elementary question on LANs
What exactly sets up the correspondence between interfaces and LANs, eg (in my case) eth1 <-> 192.168.2.0 ? I don't see any file in /etc/sysconfig , say, where this is specified. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Getting Thunderbird to open Links in Email
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 14:13 -0400, james tate wrote: > FC15 > > How do I get thunderbird to select Firefox when opening links in Emails. > > When clicking on Links in Emails nothing is happening. > > I can't find in Thunderbird Preferences a way to select Firefox. It's not a Thunderbird preference, it's a desktop preference. If you use Gnome, look under the settings panel. If on KDE you still have to use the Gnome settings since TBird is a Gnome app. In that case, run gnome-control-panel from the Shell and look for Preferred Applications. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?
On 07/13/2011 10:32 AM, Tim wrote: > Hmmph... Then goes ahead and does something that's likely to do so. > Statements, like that, are similar to: With all due respect... > And: I don't mean to be critical, but... That's not how I read it. It looked to me as though the OP was asking us our opinion of the article, especially when compared to the recent changes in Gnome. The most important difference, IMO, is the fact that with Gnome, if you really don't like the changes or aren't interested in that particular kind of change, you can always try a different DE and probably find one that works the way you like. If you get a computer with Windows 8 and it works the way the article describes, you have no choice if you stick with Windows. Just as there are people who love Gnome 3, there will people who would love that kind of a GUI for Windows, and that's great. And, of course, there are those who don't like them at first but will either learn to like them or at least to adapt to them and that's also fine. In the long run, the Linux Desktop evolves, following Darwin's maxim. Not, however, the way it's usually misquoted, but as originally written: "Survival of the fit." (Survival of the fittest is neither what he wrote or intended. If only the fittest survived and bred, few species would be able to survive long enough to become the fittest; being fit to survive is all it takes.) Thus, any DE that does what people need can survive in the Linux universe as long as there are people who like the way it works, and users are free to look around until they find the one that's best for them and if that article is right, that freedom may be the "killer app" that brings large numbers of average users away from the Dark Side. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Can't run Software Update since upgrade
On 07/13/2011 10:18 AM, Alan Evans wrote: > This same thing happened yesterday and I found that I could do the > update from a terminal with yum update. So I guess this isn't an > absolute show-stopper, but the GUI app ought to work, I think. How > should I begin troubleshooting this (like where should I go to > *actually* get more details)? I stopped using the Software Updater years ago. It would work Just Fine to tell me I had updates, but when I tried to install them it would insist that there wasn't a network connection. I have yumex installed and it works Just Fine. (At one point, it too failed to find an existing network connection, but I just disabled the check. It doesn't need to check, because I'd never try to use it if my DSL were down.) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Can't send email
On 07/13/2011 07:35 PM, Vincent Onelli wrote: Hello, I am having problem sending email, receiving is OK but sending keeping at asking for password because can't authenticate. The set up is identical to my laptop which work OK, I rechecked several times, I also redone the set up few times. The OS is F15 any of you good people have some suggestion? Vinny. Are you using Thunderbird to send mail ? I find when you send a email a window will open for your email password and it is is hidden down behind any open window where you can't see it, and your email won't send until your SMTP gets it's email password. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Getting Thunderbird to open Links in Email
FC15 How do I get thunderbird to select Firefox when opening links in Emails. When clicking on Links in Emails nothing is happening. I can't find in Thunderbird Preferences a way to select Firefox. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Don't go wireless when wired is available...
For some reason over the past week my F15 laptop has started pestering me for the WPA2 key at work when I'm using my laptop. The problem is that 1) it does it when I'm in the docking station and on a wired connection and 2) I already have a WPA2 key setup for a different wireless network at work that's present at the same time, but to which the laptop's not trying to connect. How do I, short of turning off wireless when I login while docked, tell F15/Gnome3 to stop trying to connect to a wireless network? I want it to give the wired connection preference and not try to go wireless as well. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ pgpMmf9LYmtrX.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Wireless adaptor DWL G-122 E1 /Fedora14 &Intel pentium(r)dual 3.00Ghz
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:36 PM, JD wrote: > On 03/25/2011 08:45 AM, vicenc.melen...@dixieland.jazztel.es wrote: >> >> Thank you very much Terry. >> >> The content you ask for is (for two different adaptors): >> >> Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub >> Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub >> Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub >> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub >> Bus 001 Device 002: ID 07d1:3c0f D-Link System AirPlus G DWL-G122 >> Wireless Adapter(rev.E) [Ralink RT2870] >> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub >> [Blai_isabel_Vicenc@localhost ~]$ ^C >> [Blai_isabel_Vicenc@localhost ~]$ lsusb >> Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub >> Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub >> Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub >> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub >> Bus 001 Device 003: ID 2001:3a03 D-Link Corp. DWL-G132 (no firmware) >> [Atheros AR5523] >> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub >> >> Quoting vicenc.melen...@dixieland.jazztel.es: >> >> > >> > >> > Dear users members, >> > >> > I would like to use a wireless adaptor DWL G122 witha desktop >> > machine (Intel (R) Pentium (R) D CPU 3.00 Ghz with memory 1001 MiB. >> > Kernel 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686. GNOME 2.32.0 >> > >> > I have tried Ralink r-2571w/rt2671 A B G network (rt73usb >> > firmware adaptors with no results. >> > >> > Any help is welcome. >> > >> > Kind regards >> > >> > Vicenc Melendez >> > -- >> > 2007 Jazztel - Jazz Telecom, S.A.U. http://www.jazztel.com >> > Antes de imprimir este e-mail piense bien si es necesario hacerlo. >> >> >> -- >> 2007 Jazztel - Jazz Telecom, S.A.U. http://www.jazztel.com >> Antes de imprimir este e-mail piense bien si es necesario hacerlo. >> > Originally, you had mentioned: > > >> I have tried Ralink r-2571w/rt2671 A B G network (rt73usb firmware > adaptors with no results. > > Now, you say one of your interfaces is > > Bus 001 Device 002: ID 07d1:3c0f D-Link System AirPlus G DWL-G122 > Wireless Adapter(rev.E) [Ralink RT2870] > > The Ralink rt-2870 is supported in kernel 2.6.35 and higher. > I have tested it on a USB device with the rt-2870 chipset. > The driver for this chipset is unstable and it locked up my > machine twice!. The Linux Wireless web page at > http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/rt2800usb > says rt2870 is supported, which is true, but as I stated above, it is > unstable as far as the rt2870 > chipset is concerned. > I am running on the rt2860 mini-pci module, and is very well supported > by the > rt2800/rt2x00 drivers. Only problems I have with this mini-pci card are > weak TX power, and poor Rx sensitivity. > > $ lsmod | grep rt2 > rt2800pci 6723 0 > rt2800lib 28134 1 rt2800pci > rt2x00pci 4001 1 rt2800pci > rt2x00lib 25300 3 rt2800pci,rt2800lib,rt2x00pci > > > As far as > Bus 001 Device 003: ID 2001:3a03 D-Link Corp. DWL-G132 (no firmware) > [Atheros AR5523] > > "ar5523 is a driver to support old Atheros USB 802.11abg chipsets. Work > is currently under developmen" Per: > http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ar5523#ar5523 > > Cheers, > > JD How to get AR5523 based wireless card working in Fedora 14? Do I need to compile new drivers from source? Is firmware missing? Is the best way to use windows drivers via ndiswrapper and just ignore linux based drivers for now? Cheers, Valent. -- follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt & http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turko...@hotmail.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?
On 07/13/2011 07:39 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote: > Is he right and we're moving badly in the wrong direction (as in, an > interface with a more traditional GUI feel would be a big winner?) or is > competing with a similar look-and-feel as the default while providing > lots of traditional-feeling alternatives a winning attitude? Thank you for the link. I've just passed it on to Jerry Pournelle, as I think he (and maybe his readers) will find it interesting. I think what we have in the Gnome Shell is what happens when the devs on a big project find themselves controlled by people who believe that if it's new it must be better. This, naturally, isn't always true any more than the opposite attitude of if it's new it must be bad. Of course, with Linux, those of us who don't like the direction Gnome is going in are able to move to a different DE; in Windows, you won't have that choice, so we may find ourselves becoming more mainstream if Microsoft doesn't correct its current cranio-rectal insertion. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Closing lid of laptop hibernates the computer
On 07/12/2011 02:50 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > Thanks, Suvayu. I have meanwhile installed xfce4-power-manager, but > without success. In truth, my laptop sleeps or hibernates even when I > select "Do nothing" when the lid closes (both for AC and Battery) in > xfce4-power-manager. Any further ideas? Sorry to come in so late, but I was in the hospital for 3 days. If you're still having trouble, try the forums at http://www.xfce.org/. One of the regulars is a core developer for XFCE. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: kernel bug
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 15.07.2011 15:53, schrieb James McKenzie: >> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan >> wrote: >>> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 12:24 +0200, admin lewis wrote: Hi, where I have to post for a kernel bug ? thanks lewis. >>> >>> Instead posting it, report it to Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com >> >> If it truly is a Kernel bug, should it not be reported to the Kernel >> folks? If it is a bug with one of the kernels built by the project, >> yep it should be reported to the Fedora bugzilla > > AFAIK the first bug-report should be for the fedora-kernel > because a) this are patched kernels and b) redhat is very > active upstream > > last but not least fedora users will first search on > the fedora-bugzilla and this way find your bugreport > Thank you for the that answer. Thus the report goes to Fedora's Bugzilla. James -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8? => choosing the fedora desktop
Genes MailLists wrote: > So - lets choose the default desktop manager for fedora from among: > >Gnome 3 >KDE >XFCE >LXDE >? Other? > ...so, if we actually get a vote that counts, I'd say XFCE. Of course, this is *my* personal opinion. There were technical choices the Gnome team made that I have never been happy with, but until v3 the interface worked the way I wanted so I used it and now it doesn't so I don't. I am now looking at the other desktops and so far XFCE come closest *my* preferences. Pick what you like, vote with your keyboard. ...new is not always better ...except when it is 8^/ ...this time it wasn't 8^( -- //Steve sends -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: kernel bug
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 06:53:39 -0700, James McKenzie wrote: > > If it truly is a Kernel bug, should it not be reported to the Kernel > folks? If it is a bug with one of the kernels built by the project, > yep it should be reported to the Fedora bugzilla. There are advantages to doing both. Especially if the bug is a regression in the development kernel, getting attention upstream is helpful. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: [SOVLED by '!' ]how to specify IP not equal to in iptables rules ????
On 07/15/2011 09:46 AM, Jatin K wrote: > On Friday 15 July 2011 03:10 PM, James Hogarth wrote: >> >>> '!' Solved my problem >>> >> Really? Because what you have there is the opposite of that which you >> stated you were trying to accomplish in your first post. >> >> Now that IP is the only IP that can access your FTP server and all >> others get dropped. >> > yes and thats what I wanted , Only specified IP can ftp to the server --- which is not what you stated in your first post, which was; }> I want to deny a particular IP (172.16.158.111) address in my network to }> FTP on server (RHEL6), I'm trying to add the following[1][2] iptabls }> rules on server and getting error [3] therefore, if you want to drop "IP (172.16.158.111)", you would use; [1] iptables -A INPUT -s 172.16.158.111 -p tcp --dport 21 -j DROP [2] iptables -A INPUT -s 172.16.158.111 -p tcp --dport 20 -j DROP if you want to drop all except "IP (172.16.158.111)", you would use; [1] iptables -A INPUT -s ! 172.16.158.111 -p tcp --dport 21 -j DROP [2] iptables -A INPUT -s ! 172.16.158.111 -p tcp --dport 20 -j DROP -- peace out. tc.hago, g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today. ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it. to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it. ** The installation instructions stated to install Windows 2000 or better. So I installed Linux. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: kernel bug
Am 15.07.2011 15:53, schrieb James McKenzie: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 12:24 +0200, admin lewis wrote: >>> Hi, >>> where I have to post for a kernel bug ? >>> thanks lewis. >> >> Instead posting it, report it to Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com > > If it truly is a Kernel bug, should it not be reported to the Kernel > folks? If it is a bug with one of the kernels built by the project, > yep it should be reported to the Fedora bugzilla AFAIK the first bug-report should be for the fedora-kernel because a) this are patched kernels and b) redhat is very active upstream last but not least fedora users will first search on the fedora-bugzilla and this way find your bugreport signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Software update has bugs
On 07/14/2011 09:27 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > continue and the system asked me for a passwd authorization. I entered > the only passwds that seemed possibly relevant and both were rejected What password did it _ask_ for? Depending on what you're trying to do PolicyKit (the component that handles authorisation for the updater services) may ask for either the user password or the administrator (root) password. I had a problem early on on f15 in gnome where polkit-gnome seemed to want the password for a user other than the one logged into the graphical desktop but this seemed to go away with updates. Anyway, if the problem is reproducible with up-to-date packages it sounds like a bug. > I tried to use Gnome to do the same thing. When I searched for Get or > Remove .. the only relevant application I was shown was KPackageKit. KPackageKit is the KDE interface for PackageKit. The Gnome equivalents are in the System section of the menu and are labelled "Add/Remove Software" and "Software Update". > Now I pressed my luck and ran another option called Software Update. > Which attempted it said to find updates but failed. The same option > under KVM also failed. It's hard to say without knowing specific error messages but you could try searching in bugzilla or via google for the specific messages that you saw. Regards, Bryn. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: kernel bug
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 12:24 +0200, admin lewis wrote: >> Hi, >> where I have to post for a kernel bug ? >> thanks lewis. > > Instead posting it, report it to Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com If it truly is a Kernel bug, should it not be reported to the Kernel folks? If it is a bug with one of the kernels built by the project, yep it should be reported to the Fedora bugzilla. James -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: How can I install F15 without a desktop environment
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 23:19, John Wendel wrote: > I need to install F15 without Gnome, KDE, XFCE, or LXDE. The target has > 1 GB of flash for the filesystem. So how can I install F15 with X, but > without a DE? I always do my installs off the DVD. There's also a "minimal" install that I use on my servers. It works well. Then, you'd just "yum install" whatever to get X. MJ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: kernel bug
On 07/15/2011 01:15 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 12:24 +0200, admin lewis wrote: >> Hi, >> where I have to post for a kernel bug ? >> thanks lewis. > > Instead posting it, report it to Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com You should search in bugzilla first to see if someone else has reported the same problem - if you're unsure then it does no harm to post a good description of the problem to the list to see if someone recognises it. There are some general guidelines for bug reporting in the fedoraproject wiki here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugs_and_feature_requests Which has some good links with good advice for writing effective bug reports in the bugzilla cluture section: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugs_and_feature_requests#Understanding_Bugzilla_Culture Regards, Bryn. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 14:18 -0700, James McKenzie wrote: > > I agree with you that Gnome2 is dead but someone has to explain why > a > > feature like holding the ALT key is necessary to power off in the > User > > Menu. It seems to me there was room in the original list for a Power > off > > option. > > > > I think that there is general agreement among the majority of F15 > users > > other than the Gnome developers that there are aspects of Gnome3 > that > > are just plain screwy. > This is definitely not one of those things that should exist. Maybe > the team feels that a new user would not understand what 'power off' > means. I would find that insulting as a new Linux user coming from > the other world. I think this is the wrong way to deal with this. I > have not had the time to look at Gnome3 yet, but this makes me less > likely to do so from an engineering/quality assurance/user experience > view point. BTW, do they have a 'do you really want to do this' > dialog or does Gnome3 go immediately into power down mode? > > You have the usual dialog about what you really want too do. -- === Dishonor will not trouble me, once I am dead. -- Euripides === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Software update has bugs
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 20:05 -0700, John Wendel wrote: > On 07/14/2011 01:27 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > Under KDM I asked for software updates and got an option called Get and > > Remove Software. I ran it and chose to add the Content group. I was > > shown the three documents I could add. One on Python, one on Java and > > one on Linux drivers. I chose to install the first and third. Processing > > started until I was told another dependency must be installed. I said > > continue and the system asked me for a passwd authorization. I entered > > the only passwds that seemed possibly relevant and both were rejected > > > > Ok, I started again . At the place where it asked me for a passwd > > previously it stated that I had not entered an authorizing passwd and > > quit. So I could not proceed further. > > > > I tried to use Gnome to do the same thing. When I searched for Get or > > Remove .. the only relevant application I was shown was KPackageKit. > > When I ran that I was given the option to Get and Remove Software, which > > I ran, entered the passwd which should work and it did. > > > > Now I pressed my luck and ran another option called Software Update. > > Which attempted it said to find updates but failed. The same option > > under KVM also failed. > > > > However, in Gnome under Software Tools the Software Update application > > succeeds. > > > > Have other people fond the same bug or am I going crazy again? > > Same bad experience here. All these apps are just a layer of crap spread > over yum. Save yourself some pain and use yum directly. > > Regards, > > John > I agree with your philosophy. But this all is supposed to be the desktop of our future. So at least even it is screwy it is supposed to work. Do these applications work for the rest of you? If they do why am I having such trouble using them. I also apologize for calling KDE two separate incorrect names. -- === "There is hopeful symbolism in the fact that flags do not wave in a vacuum." --Arthur C. Clarke === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: kernel bug
Am 15.07.2011 12:24, schrieb admin lewis: > Hi, > where I have to post for a kernel bug ? > thanks lewis. the same as for all other bugs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: [SOVLED by '!' ]how to specify IP not equal to in iptables rules ????
Am 15.07.2011 11:46, schrieb Jatin K: > On Friday 15 July 2011 03:10 PM, James Hogarth wrote: >> >>> >>> '!' Solved my problem >> >> Really? Because what you have there is the opposite of that which you >> stated you were trying to accomplish in your first post. >> >> Now that IP is the only IP that can access your FTP server and all >> others get dropped. >> > yes and thats what I wanted , Only specified IP can ftp to the server why do you not say this at the begin sorry, but first open a port and after that drop all except one ip is a really ugly style no one should do in production why do you not simply open the port only for the ip you want? and this way you can open fro 2, 3, 4 IPs later iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s source-ip --dport 21 -j ACCEPT signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: kernel bug
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 12:24 +0200, admin lewis wrote: > Hi, > where I have to post for a kernel bug ? > thanks lewis. Instead posting it, report it to Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:18:40 +0930 Tim wrote: > Over time, *what* did the automounting has changed. Somewhere along the > way HAL did it, and some of those other desktops didn't appear to make > use of it. And now HAL is a dinosaur and if you try to ask about using it, people look at you like you have lobsters crawling out of you ears (FYI: udev is now the king). I love the way subsystems come and go like cosmology theories. One day a theory will be hailed as the one true explanation for the entire universe, the next day it will be scoffed at as a more "elegant" theory replaces it. (And none of them had any way to be tested for validity :-). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?
On 15.07.2011, James McKenzie wrote: > If you even THINK that the current breed of developers CARE about what > the user base wants/needs, you are living in dream-land. As you mentioned before, all is about choices. If there's no interest in what the user base needs, well, the user base will move away, resulting in less and less feedback, which lets developing get more and more difficult. Bugs remain undiscovered, features get less testing, and so on. In case of Gnome 3, I guess it it won't collect much new users over from Wind*ws or Apple related systems. Think logically: those who try will probably have a great optical experience, but when things are unstable, unreliable and buggy and you have work to be done, you'll quickly move away and blame "the difficult Linux" or whatever for the bad experience. Not to mention what such a user will write if anybody is asking how Gnome 3 can be an alternative to let's say Wind*ws 7, and how many users are just too busy to try it by themselves after a lot of negative publicity... I for myself have been a big Gnome fan over a lot of years, and have been using it both at home and at work. I also have been a big LXDE and xmonad fan, which runs on all of my laptops. Not a big thing for me, I'll drop F15, and when F16 comes out, I'll stick with LXDE. It simply works and does not want to convince some Wind*ws users that Linux is the better choice... -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?
Tim: >> I see the sense in pushing the boundaries for high end computing. I >> don't see the sense in making low end computing require high end >> hardware. What's low end computing? Email, web browsing, not playing >> video games. It's just gross inefficiency to require a 4 GHz computer >> to do that. James McKenzie: > I agree with this comment. You should not need a multi-core system just > to read mail and browse the web. Adding a high end desktop system to > this is aggravating and a nuisance. That is why some folks recommend > the 'lower end' windowing systems that do the basic things. I think it's getting close to the point where the default desktop for Fedora ought not to be Gnome, and the flashier desktops ought to be the additional try them out options, rather than the lightweight ones. > I've seen people state that Gnome is needed to automount drives. > Never found that to be the case when I was running RedHat 7/8 or 9. Over time, *what* did the automounting has changed. Somewhere along the way HAL did it, and some of those other desktops didn't appear to make use of it. Likewise, when I tried using a lightweight desktop, some time ago, I got no sound. Because the console kit helper that assigned hardware to a user wasn't part of that desktop's equation. It seems to have got to the point that to use new Linux, you need a new computer. That does rather preclude new users, who will get a new computer with windows. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: P2020 (or PPC support ) for 2.6.32+ kernel in Fedora
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:23:58 +0530 Abhay Vikash wrote: > For the later version of Fedora (13 and above ..) which are based on > higher version of Linux kernel, Fedora release engineering team no > longer manages PPC releases. > > We want to use Fedora 13 (so that we can have Linux 2.6.32+) , can we > get the stable PPC support in this ? No. Fedora 13 is EOL anyway. Some people are still working on Fedora PPC, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/PowerPC They have prepared an installable version of Fedora 15, although the tree hasn't changed since May. Looks like the active development is in the rawhide tree, i.e., they're preparing for Fedora 16. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
kernel bug
Hi, where I have to post for a kernel bug ? thanks lewis. -- my blog - http://predellino.blogspot.com/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
P2020 (or PPC support ) for 2.6.32+ kernel in Fedora
Hi , >From the web , I learnt that ,the latest Fedora release( http://ftp.riken.jp/Linux/fedora/releases/) which has active supports of PPC architecture from Fedora release engineering team is Fedora12 which is based on Linux kernel 2.6.31.5-127 . For the later version of Fedora (13 and above ..) which are based on higher version of Linux kernel, Fedora release engineering team no longer manages PPC releases. We want to use Fedora 13 (so that we can have Linux 2.6.32+) , can we get the stable PPC support in this ? Regards Abhay -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: [SOVLED by '!' ]how to specify IP not equal to in iptables rules ????
On Friday 15 July 2011 03:10 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > > > > '!' Solved my problem > > > > Really? Because what you have there is the opposite of that which you > stated you were trying to accomplish in your first post. > > Now that IP is the only IP that can access your FTP server and all > others get dropped. > yes and thats what I wanted , Only specified IP can ftp to the server -- °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Jatin Khatri Registerd Linux user No #501175 www.counter.li.org No M$ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: [SOVLED by '!' ]how to specify IP not equal to in iptables rules ????
> > '!' Solved my problem > Really? Because what you have there is the opposite of that which you stated you were trying to accomplish in your first post. Now that IP is the only IP that can access your FTP server and all others get dropped. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
