Re: Troubleshooting upnp and dlna
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Marco Vittorini Orgeas wrote: >> Is there something blocking upnp discovery and sharing on FC? Could it >> be some sort of network misconfiguration that FC is picky about? >> >> Any help on how to troubleshoot upnp discovery in Fedora would be much > Yes , it's your firewall: open port 1900 UDP. Thanks Marco, that did it. Disabled the firewall, as this machine is on a firewalled local network already. All is working now. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Virtual machine => Physical machine - fix screen resolution?
I have a Scientific Linux machine that does not recognize my monitor. I had
to add (at least) this to the xorg.conf file:
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Monitor0"
VendorName "Unknown"
ModelName "CRT-0"
HorizSync 30.0 - 74.6
VertRefresh 60.0
ModeLine "1920x1200" 193.16 1920 2048 2256 2592 1200 1201 1204 1242
-hsync +vsync
Option "dpms"
EndSection
{^_^}
On 2012/01/29 14:29, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 01/28/2012 09:01 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
People,
I sent this note to the Fedora virtual list so I thought I might try
here . .
I installed a Fedora 16 x86_64 virtual machine on a Fedora 14 x86_64
server but used a physical disk (/dev/sdb = /dev/vda) so I could get the
new server going almost completely in virtual mode and then when it was
ready to go, reboot the machine on the new drive. This process went
extremely well (thanks to all the Fedora developers!) but there were a
few glitches left to sort out - one of which was the screen resolution
for both the console and in X. It seems the default virtual screen is
1024x768 but I need 1280x1024(or 768). I tried adding a vga parameter to
the linux line in the grub.cfg file but that only temporarily changed
the resolution during bootup. xorg.conf doesn't get used much anymore -
do I need to create it for this case? Is there some way to tell Fedora
to rediscover the maximum screen resolution somehow?
Thanks,
Phil.
Hey Phil,
I'm assuming that you are using a graphical desktop. Can you adjust the
resolution with System/Preferences/Display?
I know, it sounds like a dumb suggestion, but sometimes it's the simple things
that bite you.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Virtual machine => Physical machine - fix screen resolution?
On 01/28/2012 09:01 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote: People, I sent this note to the Fedora virtual list so I thought I might try here . . I installed a Fedora 16 x86_64 virtual machine on a Fedora 14 x86_64 server but used a physical disk (/dev/sdb = /dev/vda) so I could get the new server going almost completely in virtual mode and then when it was ready to go, reboot the machine on the new drive. This process went extremely well (thanks to all the Fedora developers!) but there were a few glitches left to sort out - one of which was the screen resolution for both the console and in X. It seems the default virtual screen is 1024x768 but I need 1280x1024(or 768). I tried adding a vga parameter to the linux line in the grub.cfg file but that only temporarily changed the resolution during bootup. xorg.conf doesn't get used much anymore - do I need to create it for this case? Is there some way to tell Fedora to rediscover the maximum screen resolution somehow? Thanks, Phil. Hey Phil, I'm assuming that you are using a graphical desktop. Can you adjust the resolution with System/Preferences/Display? I know, it sounds like a dumb suggestion, but sometimes it's the simple things that bite you. -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registerd Linux user No #267004 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Virtual machine => Physical machine - fix screen resolution?
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 03:30:46 -0200 From: "Germán A. Racca" To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Virtual machine => Physical machine - fix screen resolution? Message-ID: <4f24d986.3020...@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed On 01/29/2012 12:01 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: People, I sent this note to the Fedora virtual list so I thought I might try here . . I installed a Fedora 16 x86_64 virtual machine on a Fedora 14 x86_64 server but used a physical disk (/dev/sdb = /dev/vda) so I could get the new server going almost completely in virtual mode and then when it was ready to go, reboot the machine on the new drive. This process went extremely well (thanks to all the Fedora developers!) but there were a few glitches left to sort out - one of which was the screen resolution for both the console and in X. It seems the default virtual screen is 1024x768 but I need 1280x1024(or 768). I tried adding a vga parameter to the linux line in the grub.cfg file but that only temporarily changed the resolution during bootup. xorg.conf doesn't get used much anymore - do I need to create it for this case? Is there some way to tell Fedora to rediscover the maximum screen resolution somehow? Thanks, Phil. Hi Phil: Are you using Virtual Box? Did you install guest additions? You misunderstand - I installed the system originally using qemu-kvm on a PHYSICAL (not virtual) disk and then when I was happy that nearly everything was working properly, I rebooted the machine as a NON-virtual ie a normal physical machine. Regards, Phil. -- Philip Rhoades GPO Box 3411 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: SMART: sectors waiting to be remapped, negative numbers and dual boot
On 29 January 2012 08:15, Vikram Goyal wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:52:37PM +, Ian Malone wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I had a slightly worrying moment yesterday when the disc manager in >> F16 came up after booting and logging in and warned me that one of my >> drives wasn't healthy. It was installed in August so is outside the >> traditional early-failure window, which isn't to say it couldn't be on >> the verge of failing. Things that are odd though (via the disc >> management SMART view): >> 1. It reports 'electrical failure' as the SMART test status. >> 2. The parameter that is failing is "197 C5 Current Pending Sector >> Count", which shows a large negative number. >> 3. On refreshing the SMART data both problems clear, current pending >> sector count goes to 0 + n/a and drive status is healthy. >> 4. Running a short self-test the drive still shows as healthy. >> 5. On a long self test this morning I got 'electrical failure' again >> at the end, however refreshing changed this to 'healthy'. >> >> Both times I've seen this (yesterday and today) are after re-booting >> from Windows XP, so I'm wondering if there's something about XP SMART >> management (or lack off?) that's leaving this parameter unset, or >> possibly SMART is reading a small positive value incorrectly before >> pending sectors have been cleared. >> >> Does anyone else have any idea what might be going on? Drive is >> obviously still in warranty, just want to know how concerned I need to >> be. >> > Check your power supply. Did you install a GPU recently. Most probably > the system power load is higher than the supplied one. It is > imtermittant, so most probably some device when used, sucks more power > than your PSU can handle, leading to voltage drops. > > By the way, I hosed 3 of my drives this way. Thanks both for your suggestions. It hasn't happened beyond those two times, last update to the systems was installing that hard drive, which actually wasn't long after buying a new PSU to solve some stability issues. Will just have to keep an eye on it. -- imalone -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Virtual machine => Physical machine - fix screen resolution?
Mark, Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:34:52 -0500 From: Mark LaPierre To: Mail List Fedora Users Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtual machine => Physical machine - fix screen resolution? Message-ID: <4f24da7c.7060...@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed On 01/28/2012 09:01 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote: People, I sent this note to the Fedora virtual list so I thought I might try here . . I installed a Fedora 16 x86_64 virtual machine on a Fedora 14 x86_64 server but used a physical disk (/dev/sdb = /dev/vda) so I could get the new server going almost completely in virtual mode and then when it was ready to go, reboot the machine on the new drive. This process went extremely well (thanks to all the Fedora developers!) but there were a few glitches left to sort out - one of which was the screen resolution for both the console and in X. It seems the default virtual screen is 1024x768 but I need 1280x1024(or 768). I tried adding a vga parameter to the linux line in the grub.cfg file but that only temporarily changed the resolution during bootup. xorg.conf doesn't get used much anymore - do I need to create it for this case? Is there some way to tell Fedora to rediscover the maximum screen resolution somehow? Thanks, Phil. Hey Phil, I'm assuming that you are using a graphical desktop. Can you adjust the resolution with System/Preferences/Display? No - the maximum resolution there is 1024x768 - which I presume is the default res of the virtual screen. The monitor is capable of 1280x1024 (it was previously running Fedora 14). Thanks, Phil. -- Philip Rhoades GPO Box 3411 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Possible bug with F16 + fingerprint reader and gnome login
I have that same experience and I use a password login... -Original Message- From: Digimer Sender: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:46:45 To: Fedora List Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: Possible bug with F16 + fingerprint reader and gnome login Hi all, I've seen a bug for a while and was going to file a bug, but was hoping to confirm that others see it as well. When I log into Gnome by swiping my finger, it logs in and then immediately kicks out the the screen saver, requiring a second login. However, if I login by instead typing a password, it is fine. Fully up to date (as of Jan. 29, 2012) Fedora 16 x86_64. Was upgraded from Fedora 16 Lenovo Thinkpad 400s Reader is reported as "UPEK Eikon 2" -- Digimer E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Possible bug with F16 + fingerprint reader and gnome login
On 01/29/2012 01:46 PM, Digimer wrote: > Was upgraded from Fedora 16 * from Fedora 15 -- Digimer E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Possible bug with F16 + fingerprint reader and gnome login
Hi all, I've seen a bug for a while and was going to file a bug, but was hoping to confirm that others see it as well. When I log into Gnome by swiping my finger, it logs in and then immediately kicks out the the screen saver, requiring a second login. However, if I login by instead typing a password, it is fine. Fully up to date (as of Jan. 29, 2012) Fedora 16 x86_64. Was upgraded from Fedora 16 Lenovo Thinkpad 400s Reader is reported as "UPEK Eikon 2" -- Digimer E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Error 403 on Apache server, You don't have permission to access / on this server.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Alan Holt wrote: > Hello to all, > > I've web-server Apache: > [root@services share]# httpd -v > Server version: Apache/2.2.17 (Unix) > > on Fedora Linux: > [root@services share]# cat /etc/issue > Fedora release 14 (Laughlin) > > And I have domain example.domain.com where I want to see file listing in the > current directory, but when I go in the browser to example.domain.com I get > the next error: > > Forbidden > You don't have permission to access / on this server. > > So I don't know what is the problem =( > My httpd.conf: > > > Order allow,deny > Allow from All > AllowOverride All > IndexOptions +FancyIndexing > Options +Indexes Includes MultiViews FollowSymLinks AuthConfig FileInfo > > > My .htaccess file: > [root@services QaTests]# cat .htaccess > Options +Indexes > > My directory: > drwxrwsrwt 5 root apache 4096 Jan 26 17:15 QaTests > > What could be a problem I don't have any idea? > Could somebody to help me please ? Most likely SELinux is blocking it. You need to relabel that directory so httpd can read it. semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_sys_content_t /path/to/QaTests restorecon -v QaTests Note that an absolute path is required in the first command. -T.C. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Virtual machine => Physical machine - fix screen resolution?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/29/2012 12:01 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: >> People, >> >> I sent this note to the Fedora virtual list so I thought I might try >> here . . >> >> I installed a Fedora 16 x86_64 virtual machine on a Fedora 14 x86_64 >> server but used a physical disk (/dev/sdb = /dev/vda) so I could get the >> new server going almost completely in virtual mode and then when it was >> ready to go, reboot the machine on the new drive. This process went >> extremely well (thanks to all the Fedora developers!) but there were a >> few glitches left to sort out - one of which was the screen resolution >> for both the console and in X. It seems the default virtual screen is >> 1024x768 but I need 1280x1024(or 768). I tried adding a vga parameter to >> the linux line in the grub.cfg file but that only temporarily changed >> the resolution during bootup. xorg.conf doesn't get used much anymore - >> do I need to create it for this case? Is there some way to tell Fedora >> to rediscover the maximum screen resolution somehow? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Phil. > Try deleting /etc/X11/xorg.conf and see if that does it. Mikkel - -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8la/kACgkQqbQrVW3JyMRU8QCdF61OOx0xOMQfRWfENG5IAe2w sNYAnA7u7P0CilX4DOpKbtiezRccq3AR =oy0U -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fed 16 + Broadcom wlan 4312 + kernel-3.2.1-3
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 03:59:19AM -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > It's maintainer kindly built an update a mere two hours after I filed > the bug. :-) > It's in updates-testing now. You can install it by running: > yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update b43-fwcutter > > If you install it, please give it karma to get it in stable updates faster: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0908/b43-fwcutter-015-1.fc16 Downloaded, extracted firmware, it works, gave karma. Thanks again. AV -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Troubleshooting upnp and dlna
On Sunday, January 29, 2012 09:04:20 AM Khairil Yusof wrote: > Hi, > > Just installed F16 and there is an issue I don't know how to > troubleshoot and couldn't find answers easily on Google. > > My media applications can't seem to see upnp devices on my local > network. There are two providers, my phone (dlna provider), home > server (dlna provider). TV which is a dlna media player, can detect, > list and play from both these devices. Banshee on an Ubuntu PC on same > network can also see the DAAP share. So there is at least a working > configurations on the same network. The TV can't see media shared by > rygel either. > > Is there something blocking upnp discovery and sharing on FC? Could it > be some sort of network misconfiguration that FC is picky about? > > Any help on how to troubleshoot upnp discovery in Fedora would be much > appreciated. > > Regards Yes , it's your firewall: open port 1900 UDP. Marco -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Error 403 on Apache server, You don't have permission to access / on this server.
On 29/01/12 08:24, Alan Holt wrote: Hello to all, I've web-server Apache: *[root@services share]# httpd -v Server version: Apache/2.2.17 (Unix)* on Fedora Linux: *[root@services share]# cat /etc/issue Fedora release 14 (Laughlin) * Fedora 14 is EOL, and is now stored in an archive directory. Details I do not know. -- Regards, Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject UTF_8 Encoded -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Error 403 on Apache server, You don't have permission to access / on this server.
Hello to all, I've web-server Apache: *[root@services share]# httpd -v Server version: Apache/2.2.17 (Unix)* on Fedora Linux: *[root@services share]# cat /etc/issue Fedora release 14 (Laughlin) * And I have domain example.domain.com where I want to see file listing in the current directory, but when I go in the browser to example.domain.com I get the next error: *Forbidden You don't have permission to access / on this server.* So I don't know what is the problem =( My httpd.conf: * Order allow,deny Allow from All AllowOverride All IndexOptions +FancyIndexing Options +Indexes Includes MultiViews FollowSymLinks AuthConfig FileInfo * My .htaccess file: *[root@services QaTests]# cat .htaccess Options +Indexes * My directory: *drwxrwsrwt5 root apache 4096 Jan 26 17:15 QaTests* What could be a problem I don't have any idea? Could somebody to help me please ? -- בברכה, אלכס ברבר +9 72 54 285 952 3 www.linuxspace.org -- Best regards. Alex Berber +9 72 54 285 952 3 www.linuxspace.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: SMART: sectors waiting to be remapped, negative numbers and dual boot
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:52:37PM +, Ian Malone wrote: > Hi, > > I had a slightly worrying moment yesterday when the disc manager in > F16 came up after booting and logging in and warned me that one of my > drives wasn't healthy. It was installed in August so is outside the > traditional early-failure window, which isn't to say it couldn't be on > the verge of failing. Things that are odd though (via the disc > management SMART view): > 1. It reports 'electrical failure' as the SMART test status. > 2. The parameter that is failing is "197 C5 Current Pending Sector > Count", which shows a large negative number. > 3. On refreshing the SMART data both problems clear, current pending > sector count goes to 0 + n/a and drive status is healthy. > 4. Running a short self-test the drive still shows as healthy. > 5. On a long self test this morning I got 'electrical failure' again > at the end, however refreshing changed this to 'healthy'. > > Both times I've seen this (yesterday and today) are after re-booting > from Windows XP, so I'm wondering if there's something about XP SMART > management (or lack off?) that's leaving this parameter unset, or > possibly SMART is reading a small positive value incorrectly before > pending sectors have been cleared. > > Does anyone else have any idea what might be going on? Drive is > obviously still in warranty, just want to know how concerned I need to > be. > Check your power supply. Did you install a GPU recently. Most probably the system power load is higher than the supplied one. It is imtermittant, so most probably some device when used, sucks more power than your PSU can handle, leading to voltage drops. By the way, I hosed 3 of my drives this way. -- vikram... ^^'^^||root||^^^'''^^ // \\ )) //(( \\// \\ // /\\ || \\ || / )) ((\\ -- YOW!! Up ahead! It's a DONUT HUT!! -- . ~|~ = -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
