Re: IP address incorrectly assigned on boot
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 20:13 -0800, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > server > geoff@mtranch[1]->cat /sys/class/net/wlan0/address > 00:19:d2:2d:f2:76 > client > root@pvr[25]->cat /sys/class/net/wlan0/address > ae:f2:65:4b:b2:16 > > So -- how do I resolve the difference? > And how does the driver come up with the data? Assuming server and client are two different machines, of course they have different MAC addresses. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Sound stopped working -
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 20:01 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote: > On 02/03/2012 12:26 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > > Sound stopped working after I tried a USB Sound Adapter, which > > only lit its indicator leds. > > > > Normally the following should produce sound from the loudspeaker. > > [root@box6 bobg]# aplay /usr/share/sounds/purple/login.wav > > ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:1018:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave > > aplay: main:660: audio open error: Device or resource busy > > > > It does not, and no sound shows on the PAVC input or output > > bars. I'm not certain of how signal moves through the sound > > circuit but it looks like it doesn't get from PA to ALSA input? > > > > I can feed a signal into the sound input jack and produce normal > > indications on the PAVC display and sound at the loudspeaker. > > > > Apparently plugging in that USB "sound adapter" switched > > something in the logic. Rebooting has not changed things? Is > > there a default conig. file somewhere? > > > > I've tried everything I can think of via the alsamixer display > > settings. > > > > Everything did work normally before this. > > > > Also, it would be helpful if there was a way to generate a > > continuous tone or keep aplay looping continuously when messing > > with cables under the desk, etc. I have not been able to find > > anything to do that. > > > > Suggestions wanted, what do I do next? > > > > Bob > > . > > > > while [ 1 <> 0 ] > do > aplay sound.wav > done while true do ... etc. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: IP address incorrectly assigned on boot
On 02/03/2012 04:52:39 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 02/03/2012 02:39 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > > On 02/03/2012 01:54:34 PM, j.e.aneiros wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Geoffrey Leach > >> wrote: > >> > >>> A system on my local network (pvr) has its IP address in > /etc/hosts > >>> > >>> geoff@pvr[1]->cat /etc/hosts > >>> 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4 > >>> localhost4.localdomain4 > >>> > >>> 192.168.10.2pvr.mtranch.com pvr > >>> 192.168.10.3mtranch.mtranch.com mtranch > >>> 192.168.10.1Netgear > >>> 198.168.20.5Homerun > >>> > >>> Netgear router accessed from pvr via wireless. It has the address > >>> 192.168.10.2 reserved and assigned to pvr. Worked fine. Today > >> after > >>> booting up the latest kernel, (3.2.2-1.fc16.i686.PAE), the IP > >> address > >>> has changed to 192.168.10.5: > >>> > >>> geoff@pvr[2]->ifconfig wlan0 > >>> wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr AE:5D:BA:91:67:2D > >>> inet addr:192.168.10.5 Bcast:192.168.10.255 > >>> Mask:255.255.255.0 > >>> inet6 addr: fe80::ac5d:baff:fe91:672d/64 Scope:Link > >>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > >>> RX packets:484 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > >>> TX packets:462 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > >>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > >>> > >>> you'll note that it is 192.168.10.5 > >>> > >>> Not surprisingly, I can't ssh 192.168.10.2, but I can ssh > >> 192.168.10.5 > >>> > >>> Question: where is this (dynamic?) assignment taking place? > >>> > >> > >> I think the machine is requesting the router a new IP and the > router > >> couldn't match the MAC of the request with the MAC associated to > the > >> reserved IP 192.168.10.2, so is giving a new IP in the range. > >> Something > >> change at the machine, did you check the MAC AE:5D:BA:91:67:2D > >> against > >> your > >> rule in the router? > > > > Your suspicion was correct. I replaced the one in use with the one > from > > ifconfig. Unfortunately that did not fix the problem. > > > > I need a tutorial on assigning MAC addresses, as they are > inconsistent > > on the server and client. Is it correct that the MAC address is the > > same as HWADDR in the ifcfg file? And why would the value change > when > > the hardware did not? > > They're supposed to be the same. The only way to be sure is to > actually > see what the driver assigned as the MAC address: > > $ cat /sys/class/net/wlan0/address server geoff@mtranch[1]->cat /sys/class/net/wlan0/address 00:19:d2:2d:f2:76 client root@pvr[25]->cat /sys/class/net/wlan0/address ae:f2:65:4b:b2:16 So -- how do I resolve the difference? And how does the driver come up with the data? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dvd burner db50
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 19:13 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > I'm going to buy a (usb) dvd burner db50, I wonder if anyone is using > on Linux... Is db50 a model number? You might want to mention the brand as well. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to upgrade again,some tools and applications!!!
On 02/04/2012 11:09 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > unbelieveable - how many threads will not be started about the same problem > WAIT until all depending packages are rebuilt and in the repos > dep-solv problems are never a reason to panic and will be solved > after a short time without many postings everywhere > > or enable rpmfusion-testing to get the rebuilt ffmpeg > > but why do nobody read all the existing threads belonging to this problem Don't forget to add that it would also be a good idea to "yum clean dbcache" before trying again -- Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong. -- Dandemis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to upgrade again,some tools and applications!!!
Am 04.02.2012 03:39, schrieb Kaushik Guha: > *Packages skipped because of dependency problems*: > firefox-10.0-1.fc16.x86_64 from updates > gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.22-2.fc16.2.x86_64 from updates > libvpx-1.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64 from updates > xulrunner-10.0-1.fc16.x86_64 from updates > [root@localhost ~]# > > What are the dependency problems? > Is it something to do with libvpx.so.0()(64-bit)? > How do I proceed? unbelieveable - how many threads will not be started about the same problem WAIT until all depending packages are rebuilt and in the repos dep-solv problems are never a reason to panic and will be solved after a short time without many postings everywhere or enable rpmfusion-testing to get the rebuilt ffmpeg but why do nobody read all the existing threads belonging to this problem signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: IP address incorrectly assigned on boot
On 2012/02/03 16:52, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 02/03/2012 02:39 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
On 02/03/2012 01:54:34 PM, j.e.aneiros wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Geoffrey Leach
wrote:
A system on my local network (pvr) has its IP address in /etc/hosts
geoff@pvr[1]->cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4
localhost4.localdomain4
192.168.10.2 pvr.mtranch.com pvr
192.168.10.3 mtranch.mtranch.com mtranch
192.168.10.1 Netgear
198.168.20.5 Homerun
Netgear router accessed from pvr via wireless. It has the address
192.168.10.2 reserved and assigned to pvr. Worked fine. Today
after
booting up the latest kernel, (3.2.2-1.fc16.i686.PAE), the IP
address
has changed to 192.168.10.5:
geoff@pvr[2]->ifconfig wlan0
wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr AE:5D:BA:91:67:2D
inet addr:192.168.10.5 Bcast:192.168.10.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::ac5d:baff:fe91:672d/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:484 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:462 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
you'll note that it is 192.168.10.5
Not surprisingly, I can't ssh 192.168.10.2, but I can ssh
192.168.10.5
Question: where is this (dynamic?) assignment taking place?
I think the machine is requesting the router a new IP and the router
couldn't match the MAC of the request with the MAC associated to the
reserved IP 192.168.10.2, so is giving a new IP in the range.
Something
change at the machine, did you check the MAC AE:5D:BA:91:67:2D
against
your
rule in the router?
Your suspicion was correct. I replaced the one in use with the one from
ifconfig. Unfortunately that did not fix the problem.
I need a tutorial on assigning MAC addresses, as they are inconsistent
on the server and client. Is it correct that the MAC address is the
same as HWADDR in the ifcfg file? And why would the value change when
the hardware did not?
They're supposed to be the same. The only way to be sure is to actually
see what the driver assigned as the MAC address:
$ cat /sys/class/net/wlan0/address
What's returned by that is the MAC address as set up by the driver.
That should match the value in the ifcfg file's HWADDR field.
There is also the little pesky detail that the computer remembers the address
that it last used and requests that of the DHCP server. Modulo the server
involved it will give the requested address regardless of whether it has a
formal assignment for that MAC to another address or not. You may have to
tell the computer to formally release the current DHCP assignment before
going off to request a new one.
{o.o} Been bit by this one before. It's also painful to change a computer's
name on a network in which the dhcpd updates the named. Absurdly short
TTLs helps.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to upgrade again,some tools and applications!!!
Hello Fedora Friends users community, I had adjusted and configured my repos.list according to your advice,and got fruitful results. *But please see this,and help me out of the problem*:- [root@localhost ~]# yum upgrade Loaded plugins: aliases, auto-update-debuginfo, changelog, dellsysid, downloadonly, etckeeper, : fastestmirror, filter-data, fs-snapshot, fusioninventory-agent, keys, langpacks, : list-data, local, merge-conf, post-transaction-actions, presto, priorities, : protectbase, ps, puppetverify, refresh-packagekit, refresh-updatesd, remove-with- : leaves, rpm-warm-cache, security, show-leaves, tmprepo, tsflags, upgrade-helper, : verify, versionlock Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * fedora: fedora.iitm.ac.in * fedora-debuginfo: ftp.kddilabs.jp * fedora-source: ftp.kddilabs.jp * rpmfusion-free: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in * rpmfusion-free-debuginfo: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-free-source: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-free-updates: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in * rpmfusion-free-updates-debuginfo: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-free-updates-source: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-nonfree: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in * rpmfusion-nonfree-debuginfo: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-nonfree-source: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-debuginfo: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-source: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * updates: fedora.iitm.ac.in * updates-debuginfo: ftp.kddilabs.jp * updates-source: ftp.kddilabs.jp Skipping filters plugin, no data 0 packages excluded due to repository protections Setting up Upgrade Process Resolving Dependencies Skipping filters plugin, no data --> Running transaction check ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:9.0.1-1.fc16 will be updated ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:10.0-1.fc16 will be an update ---> Package gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.x86_64 0:0.10.22-2.fc16.1 will be updated ---> Package gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.x86_64 0:0.10.22-2.fc16.2 will be an update ---> Package libvpx.x86_64 0:0.9.7.1-1.fc16 will be updated --> *Processing Dependency: libvpx.so.0()(64bit) for package: libavcodec53-0.9-52.fc16.x86_64* ---> Package libvpx.x86_64 0:1.0.0-1.fc16 will be an update ---> Package xulrunner.x86_64 0:9.0.1-1.fc16 will be updated ---> Package xulrunner.x86_64 0:10.0-1.fc16 will be an update --> Running transaction check ---> Package libvpx.x86_64 0:0.9.7.1-1.fc16 will be updated ---> Package libvpx.x86_64 0:1.0.0-1.fc16 will be an update --> *Processing Dependency: libvpx.so.1()(64bit) for package: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.22-2.fc16.2.x86_64* --> *Processing Dependency: libvpx.so.1()(64bit) for package: xulrunner-10.0-1.fc16.x86_64* --> Running transaction check ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:9.0.1-1.fc16 will be updated *Packages skipped because of dependency problems*: firefox-10.0-1.fc16.x86_64 from updates gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.22-2.fc16.2.x86_64 from updates libvpx-1.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64 from updates xulrunner-10.0-1.fc16.x86_64 from updates [root@localhost ~]# What are the dependency problems? Is it something to do with libvpx.so.0()(64-bit)? How do I proceed? -Kaushik Guha -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: libvpx issues, anyone?
On 04/02/12 12:25, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 04.02.2012 02:08, schrieb Paul Smith: On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Roger wrote: Does anyone except me had problems today with updating their F16 systems? I seem to have dependency problems regarding ffmpeg-libs and/or libvpx. My repos are standard Fedora ones and rpmfusion. And 'yum clean all' did not help. Yes same here Another one in the same situation. WAIT or enable updates-testing from rpmfusion it will not change anything if another 100 people tell about a known problem Yes true but as a result you offered an answer that we did not previously have. Roger -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: libvpx issues, anyone?
Am 04.02.2012 02:08, schrieb Paul Smith: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Roger wrote: >>> Does anyone except me had problems today with updating their F16 systems? >>> I seem to have dependency problems regarding ffmpeg-libs and/or libvpx. My >>> repos are standard Fedora ones and rpmfusion. And 'yum clean all' did not >>> help. >>> >> Yes same here > > Another one in the same situation. WAIT or enable updates-testing from rpmfusion it will not change anything if another 100 people tell about a known problem signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: libvpx issues, anyone?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Roger wrote: >> Does anyone except me had problems today with updating their F16 systems? >> I seem to have dependency problems regarding ffmpeg-libs and/or libvpx. My >> repos are standard Fedora ones and rpmfusion. And 'yum clean all' did not >> help. >> > Yes same here Another one in the same situation. Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Sound stopped working -
On 02/03/2012 12:26 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: Sound stopped working after I tried a USB Sound Adapter, which only lit its indicator leds. Normally the following should produce sound from the loudspeaker. [root@box6 bobg]# aplay /usr/share/sounds/purple/login.wav ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:1018:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave aplay: main:660: audio open error: Device or resource busy It does not, and no sound shows on the PAVC input or output bars. I'm not certain of how signal moves through the sound circuit but it looks like it doesn't get from PA to ALSA input? I can feed a signal into the sound input jack and produce normal indications on the PAVC display and sound at the loudspeaker. Apparently plugging in that USB "sound adapter" switched something in the logic. Rebooting has not changed things? Is there a default conig. file somewhere? I've tried everything I can think of via the alsamixer display settings. Everything did work normally before this. Also, it would be helpful if there was a way to generate a continuous tone or keep aplay looping continuously when messing with cables under the desk, etc. I have not been able to find anything to do that. Suggestions wanted, what do I do next? Bob . while [ 1 <> 0 ] do aplay sound.wav done -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registerd Linux user No #267004 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: IP address incorrectly assigned on boot
On 02/03/2012 02:39 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote: On 02/03/2012 01:54:34 PM, j.e.aneiros wrote: On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote: A system on my local network (pvr) has its IP address in /etc/hosts geoff@pvr[1]->cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4 localhost4.localdomain4 192.168.10.2pvr.mtranch.com pvr 192.168.10.3mtranch.mtranch.com mtranch 192.168.10.1Netgear 198.168.20.5Homerun Netgear router accessed from pvr via wireless. It has the address 192.168.10.2 reserved and assigned to pvr. Worked fine. Today after booting up the latest kernel, (3.2.2-1.fc16.i686.PAE), the IP address has changed to 192.168.10.5: geoff@pvr[2]->ifconfig wlan0 wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr AE:5D:BA:91:67:2D inet addr:192.168.10.5 Bcast:192.168.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::ac5d:baff:fe91:672d/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:484 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:462 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 you'll note that it is 192.168.10.5 Not surprisingly, I can't ssh 192.168.10.2, but I can ssh 192.168.10.5 Question: where is this (dynamic?) assignment taking place? I think the machine is requesting the router a new IP and the router couldn't match the MAC of the request with the MAC associated to the reserved IP 192.168.10.2, so is giving a new IP in the range. Something change at the machine, did you check the MAC AE:5D:BA:91:67:2D against your rule in the router? Your suspicion was correct. I replaced the one in use with the one from ifconfig. Unfortunately that did not fix the problem. I need a tutorial on assigning MAC addresses, as they are inconsistent on the server and client. Is it correct that the MAC address is the same as HWADDR in the ifcfg file? And why would the value change when the hardware did not? They're supposed to be the same. The only way to be sure is to actually see what the driver assigned as the MAC address: $ cat /sys/class/net/wlan0/address What's returned by that is the MAC address as set up by the driver. That should match the value in the ifcfg file's HWADDR field. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - If you can't beat your computer at chess...try kickboxing! - -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
invalid source port message?
I have a CISCO E4200 router, recently installed. I am receiving the following message in /var/log/messages avahi-daemon[1029]: Received response from host 192.168.7.1 with invalid source port 32783 on interface 'eth0.0' 192.168.7.1 is the address for the E4200 router. Where does this address come from and how do I fix it? Thanks, Don -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: libvpx issues, anyone?
On 02/04/2012 12:06 AM, Rares Aioanei wrote: Hello folks, Does anyone except me had problems today with updating their F16 systems? I seem to have dependency problems regarding ffmpeg-libs and/or libvpx. My repos are standard Fedora ones and rpmfusion. And 'yum clean all' did not help. Thanks, Yes same here Roger -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Changing kernel in grub 2
On 03.02.2012, don fisher wrote: > 1. edit the script that says do not edit That's what I do. However, I have never used any distribution kernel beyond the installing process. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: IP address incorrectly assigned on boot
On 02/03/2012 01:54:34 PM, j.e.aneiros wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Geoffrey Leach > wrote: > > > A system on my local network (pvr) has its IP address in /etc/hosts > > > > geoff@pvr[1]->cat /etc/hosts > > 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4 > > localhost4.localdomain4 > > > > 192.168.10.2pvr.mtranch.com pvr > > 192.168.10.3mtranch.mtranch.com mtranch > > 192.168.10.1Netgear > > 198.168.20.5Homerun > > > > Netgear router accessed from pvr via wireless. It has the address > > 192.168.10.2 reserved and assigned to pvr. Worked fine. Today > after > > booting up the latest kernel, (3.2.2-1.fc16.i686.PAE), the IP > address > > has changed to 192.168.10.5: > > > > geoff@pvr[2]->ifconfig wlan0 > > wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr AE:5D:BA:91:67:2D > > inet addr:192.168.10.5 Bcast:192.168.10.255 > > Mask:255.255.255.0 > > inet6 addr: fe80::ac5d:baff:fe91:672d/64 Scope:Link > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > RX packets:484 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > TX packets:462 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > > > > you'll note that it is 192.168.10.5 > > > > Not surprisingly, I can't ssh 192.168.10.2, but I can ssh > 192.168.10.5 > > > > Question: where is this (dynamic?) assignment taking place? > > > > I think the machine is requesting the router a new IP and the router > couldn't match the MAC of the request with the MAC associated to the > reserved IP 192.168.10.2, so is giving a new IP in the range. > Something > change at the machine, did you check the MAC AE:5D:BA:91:67:2D > against > your > rule in the router? Your suspicion was correct. I replaced the one in use with the one from ifconfig. Unfortunately that did not fix the problem. I need a tutorial on assigning MAC addresses, as they are inconsistent on the server and client. Is it correct that the MAC address is the same as HWADDR in the ifcfg file? And why would the value change when the hardware did not? Thanks. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
dvd burner db50
I'm going to buy a (usb) dvd burner db50, I wonder if anyone is using on Linux... Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: IP address incorrectly assigned on boot
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > A system on my local network (pvr) has its IP address in /etc/hosts > > geoff@pvr[1]->cat /etc/hosts > 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4 > localhost4.localdomain4 > > 192.168.10.2pvr.mtranch.com pvr > 192.168.10.3mtranch.mtranch.com mtranch > 192.168.10.1Netgear > 198.168.20.5Homerun > > Netgear router accessed from pvr via wireless. It has the address > 192.168.10.2 reserved and assigned to pvr. Worked fine. Today after > booting up the latest kernel, (3.2.2-1.fc16.i686.PAE), the IP address > has changed to 192.168.10.5: > > geoff@pvr[2]->ifconfig wlan0 > wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr AE:5D:BA:91:67:2D > inet addr:192.168.10.5 Bcast:192.168.10.255 > Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: fe80::ac5d:baff:fe91:672d/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:484 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:462 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > > you'll note that it is 192.168.10.5 > > Not surprisingly, I can't ssh 192.168.10.2, but I can ssh 192.168.10.5 > > Question: where is this (dynamic?) assignment taking place? > I think the machine is requesting the router a new IP and the router couldn't match the MAC of the request with the MAC associated to the reserved IP 192.168.10.2, so is giving a new IP in the range. Something change at the machine, did you check the MAC AE:5D:BA:91:67:2D against your rule in the router? > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- J. E. Aneiros GNU/Linux User #190716 en http://counter.li.org perl -e '$_=pack(c5,0105,0107,0123,0132,(1<<3)+2);y[A-Z][N-ZA-M];print;' PK fingerprint: 5179 917E 5B34 F073 E11A AFB3 4CB3 5301 4A80 F674 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
IP address incorrectly assigned on boot
A system on my local network (pvr) has its IP address in /etc/hosts geoff@pvr[1]->cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4 localhost4.localdomain4 192.168.10.2pvr.mtranch.com pvr 192.168.10.3mtranch.mtranch.com mtranch 192.168.10.1Netgear 198.168.20.5Homerun Netgear router accessed from pvr via wireless. It has the address 192.168.10.2 reserved and assigned to pvr. Worked fine. Today after booting up the latest kernel, (3.2.2-1.fc16.i686.PAE), the IP address has changed to 192.168.10.5: geoff@pvr[2]->ifconfig wlan0 wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr AE:5D:BA:91:67:2D inet addr:192.168.10.5 Bcast:192.168.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::ac5d:baff:fe91:672d/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:484 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:462 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 you'll note that it is 192.168.10.5 Not surprisingly, I can't ssh 192.168.10.2, but I can ssh 192.168.10.5 Question: where is this (dynamic?) assignment taking place? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Changing kernel in grub 2
On Friday 03 Feb 2012 12:19:32 don fisher wrote: > I have been using grub1, where you could edit the menu.1st command to > change kernels. The only place that I see the kernels listed is in > /boot/grub2/grub.cfg which is generated by the files in /etc. > > If the current kernel does not work as desired, how does one choose the > previous kernel? The only choices I see are: > > 1. edit the script that says do not edit > 2. remove the bad kernel from /boot and run grub2-mkconfig > > Please advise. Once boot is broken, it is really bad! Don, make any changes in the grub file which is in /etc/default/ The line you want to edit is GRUB_DEFAULT= and then run grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg Then the changes you made are kept during the next kernel update/reboot etc HTH Colin -- Fedora release 16 (Verne) Registered Linux user number #342953 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Changing kernel in grub 2
On 02/03/2012 11:19 AM, don fisher wrote: If the current kernel does not work as desired, how does one choose the previous kernel? The only choices I see are: 1. edit the script that says do not edit 2. remove the bad kernel from /boot and run grub2-mkconfig Please advise. Once boot is broken, it is really bad! Currently, I have to select an old 2.x kernel on my laptop because all of the 3.x kernels hang. It's safe to edit /boot/grub2/grub.cfg if you're careful, but the next time it's generated your changes will go away. One thing that's safe to change is the timeout period, because all that does is decide how long you have before grub2 starts booting your default kernel. Setting it to 5 gives you five seconds, and that should be ample because once you press the ANY key, the timer stops; if you have good reflexes, or quick boot times are important, three's probably ample. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Changing kernel in grub 2
On 2/3/2012 2:19 PM, don fisher wrote: I have been using grub1, where you could edit the menu.1st command to change kernels. The only place that I see the kernels listed is in /boot/grub2/grub.cfg which is generated by the files in /etc. If the current kernel does not work as desired, how does one choose the previous kernel? The only choices I see are: 1. edit the script that says do not edit 2. remove the bad kernel from /boot and run grub2-mkconfig Please advise. Once boot is broken, it is really bad! Thanks, don try, in the very first stages of boot, pressing nearly any keyboard key; it should bring up a menu listing your available kernels which you can then choose from by using your up/down arrow keys... -- Claude Jones Brunswick, MD, USA -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Changing kernel in grub 2
On 3 February 2012 19:19, don fisher wrote: > I have been using grub1, where you could edit the menu.1st command to change > kernels. The only place that I see the kernels listed is in > /boot/grub2/grub.cfg which is generated by the files in /etc. > > If the current kernel does not work as desired, how does one choose the > previous kernel? The only choices I see are: > > 1. edit the script that says do not edit > 2. remove the bad kernel from /boot and run grub2-mkconfig > > Please advise. Once boot is broken, it is really bad! > Been wondering this myself with the recent wireless breakage, I haven't tried this yet, but: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Grub2 section /etc/default/grub looks to be useful. Mine is currently set to 'saved' which doesn't seem to do what you'd expect, I think it might be necessary to also do GRUB_SAVEDEFAULT=true to remember the previous selection (something you couldn't do previously, so an improvement if it works even if there is a learning curve). The other thing to watch out for is having a working kernel drop off your system when another update comes out. GRUB_DEFAULT - Sets the default menu entry. Entries may be numeric, a complete menuentry quotation, or "saved" GRUB_DEFAULT=0 Sets the default menu entry by menu position. Counting of entries is the same as in GRUB - the first "menuentry" in grub.cfg is 0, the second is 1, etc. Note: Grub 1.99 introduces a submenu menu structure. For a menu item in a submenu, the entry becomes a two-digit entry. The first entry is the position of the submenu title in the main menu. The second entry is the position within the submenu. If the submenu is the 3rd entry in the main entry, and the user wishes to boot the first entry in the submenu, it would be designated as "2>0" GRUB_DEFAULT="" An exact menu entry, including the quotation symbols, may also be used. In this case, location in the menu will not matter. Example: GRUB_DEFAULT="Ubuntu, Linux 2.6.31-9-generic" In a Grub 1.99 submenu, the format would first include the submenu number, followed by the title. Example: "2>Ubuntu, Linux 2.6.38-8-generic" GRUB_DEFAULT=saved The information in this section applies to GRUB 1.98 and later. Enables the "grub-reboot" and "grub-set-default" commands to set the default OS. The default OS will not be set by an interactive selection of an OS from the menu. grub-set-default Sets the default boot entry until changed. The format is sudo grub-set-default X, with X being the menu entry position (starting with 0 as the first entry) or the exact menu string. Examples: sudo grub-set-default 3 or sudo grub-set-default "Ubuntu, Linux 2.6.32-15-generic" To obtain the existing menu entry choice number (starting from 0) or the menu entry "string", run grep menuentry /boot/grub/grub.cfg grub-reboot This command sets the default boot entry for the next boot only. The format of the command is the same as for grub-set-default (see above). GRUB_SAVEDEFAULT= If set to true this setting will automatically set the last selected OS from the menu as the default OS on the next boot. No commands need be run to set the default OS. Any time a menu entry is manually selected from the GRUB 2 menu, it becomes the default OS. This option currently does not work if your /boot directory resides on an LVM partition or RAID. -- imalone -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Changing kernel in grub 2
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 12:19 -0700, don fisher wrote: > I have been using grub1, where you could edit the menu.1st command to > change kernels. The only place that I see the kernels listed is in > /boot/grub2/grub.cfg which is generated by the files in /etc. > > If the current kernel does not work as desired, how does one choose the > previous kernel? The only choices I see are: > > 1. edit the script that says do not edit > 2. remove the bad kernel from /boot and run grub2-mkconfig > > Please advise. Once boot is broken, it is really bad! > > Thanks, > don https://flyingpengwin.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/fedora-how-to-change-the-boot-order-in-grub2-to-windows-7/ google search: grub2 boot order change fefora -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Changing kernel in grub 2
I have been using grub1, where you could edit the menu.1st command to change kernels. The only place that I see the kernels listed is in /boot/grub2/grub.cfg which is generated by the files in /etc. If the current kernel does not work as desired, how does one choose the previous kernel? The only choices I see are: 1. edit the script that says do not edit 2. remove the bad kernel from /boot and run grub2-mkconfig Please advise. Once boot is broken, it is really bad! Thanks, don -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: libvpx issues, anyone?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Steven Stern wrote: > Fixed it with "sudo yum clean all;sudo yum update" clean all is using a sledge hammer to put in a finishing nail. "clean metadata" or even "clean expire-cache" would probably have been sufficient. Richard -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: libvpx issues, anyone?
On 02/03/2012 07:14 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 02/03/2012 02:10 PM, sguazt wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Rares Aioanei >> wrote: >>> Hello folks, >>> >>> Does anyone except me had problems today with updating their F16 systems? I >>> seem to have dependency problems regarding ffmpeg-libs and/or libvpx. My >>> repos are standard Fedora ones and rpmfusion. And 'yum clean all' did not >>> help. >>> >> >> I had this problem until few minutes ago as well. >> Now it seems it has been fixed. >> >> >> -- Marco > > Oops, > > I don't have the impression! Still I get: > > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:9.0.1-1.fc16 will be updated > [snip] > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: Package: ffmpeg-libs-0.8.8-1.fc16.x86_64 (@rpmfusion-free-updates) >Requires: libvpx.so.0()(64bit) >Removing: libvpx-0.9.7.1-1.fc16.x86_64 (@updates-testing) >libvpx.so.0()(64bit) >Updated By: libvpx-1.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64 (updates) >Not found Fixed it with "sudo yum clean all;sudo yum update" I think that some repos just needed to get into the right alignments and my system needed to update cache. -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Sound stopped working -
Sound stopped working after I tried a USB Sound Adapter, which only lit its indicator leds. Normally the following should produce sound from the loudspeaker. [root@box6 bobg]# aplay /usr/share/sounds/purple/login.wav ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:1018:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave aplay: main:660: audio open error: Device or resource busy It does not, and no sound shows on the PAVC input or output bars. I'm not certain of how signal moves through the sound circuit but it looks like it doesn't get from PA to ALSA input? I can feed a signal into the sound input jack and produce normal indications on the PAVC display and sound at the loudspeaker. Apparently plugging in that USB "sound adapter" switched something in the logic. Rebooting has not changed things? Is there a default conig. file somewhere? I've tried everything I can think of via the alsamixer display settings. Everything did work normally before this. Also, it would be helpful if there was a way to generate a continuous tone or keep aplay looping continuously when messing with cables under the desk, etc. I have not been able to find anything to do that. Suggestions wanted, what do I do next? Bob . -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Can't see ADSL modem
Marko Vojinovic wrote: >> I have a small mystery on my home network. ... >> The CentOS-6.2 machine does not get any response to pings >> from the modem, but is able to ping sites beyond the modem. >> >> Could some knowledgeable soul suggest a reason for this? > > Are you sure the problem is with the CentOS machine and not the router > itself? ... > OTOH, if CentOS still doesn't work, then it's most probably the firewall > --- either the CentOS firewall or the router firewall. Check them both for > dropping ICMP packets. > > I cannot think of any other problem. Can CentOS ping other machines on > your LAN? Thanks for all the responses. I have to confess that my error was probably at kindergarten level ... The modem is at 192.168.1.254 , while my LAN is 192.168.2.0 , which the computer accesses through eth1 . I found (from "route") that this computer was trying to send packets for the modem through eth0, to which nothing was connected. After I ran [tim@grover ~]$ sudo ifconfig eth0 down I was able to access the modem. I looked at /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 and I saw that "ONBOOT=yes" was set. (I had copied this from my working server.) I sort of thought that this would not be activated unless something was connected to the ethernet socket ... -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: libvpx issues, anyone?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Rares Aioanei wrote: > Hello folks, > > Does anyone except me had problems today with updating their F16 systems? I > seem to have dependency problems regarding ffmpeg-libs and/or libvpx. My > repos are standard Fedora ones and rpmfusion. And 'yum clean all' did not > help. There's an updated ffmpeg build in RPMFusion updates-testing that fixes this problem. yum --enablerepo=rpmfusion-free-updates-testing update -T.C. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: how to not receive list mail batched in a daily digest
On 03/02/12 13:55, jsduba wrote: please dear: how to refuse list mail in every day? thank you! Go here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/options/users You will need to enter your email and password. Then go down to "receive daily digest" To unsubscribe completly: Just click unsubscribe, and wait for the "confirm" email. -- Regards, Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject UTF_8 Encoded -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
perl/math::gsl
Hello, Since I updated in fedora 16 (including the last updates), I cannot install math::gsl anymore. I got a failure in the ./Build test using either cpan or the manual installation. According to Jonathan Leto it is an issue with the perl installation. How can we make progresses? Linux 3.2.2-1.fc16.i686.PAE #1 SMP Thu Jan 26 03:30:43 UTC 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux This is perl 5, version 14, subversion 2 (v5.14.2) built for i386-linux-thread-multi THANKS -- --- == Patrick DUPRÉ | | Department of Chemistry| | Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-434384 The University of York | | Fax: (44)-(0)-1904-432516 Heslington | | York YO10 5DD United Kingdom | | email: patrick.du...@york.ac.uk ==-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: how to not receive list mail batched in a daily digest
2012/2/3 jsduba : > please dear: > how to refuse list mail in every day? https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/options/users?email=duba...@msn.com > thank you! -T.C. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: libvpx issues, anyone?
On 03/02/12 13:17, Reindl Harald wrote: Take 10 minutes to read the archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2012-February/413232.html nice link but where is there any word about the missing ffmpeg-rebuild from rpmfusion or any line specify "This combination does not appear to work"? My apologies. I cliked the wrong link. I meant the devel archives. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-February/162000.html But Google would have still brought an answer. -- Regards, Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject UTF_8 Encoded -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: libvpx issues, anyone?
Am 03.02.2012 14:14, schrieb Frank Murphy: > On 03/02/12 13:06, Rares Aioanei wrote: >> Hello folks, >> >> Does anyone except me had problems today with updating their F16 >> systems? I seem to have dependency problems regarding ffmpeg-libs and/or >> libvpx. My repos are standard Fedora ones and rpmfusion. And 'yum clean >> all' did not help. >> >> Thanks, >> > > Take 10 minutes to read the archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2012-February/413232.html nice link but where is there any word about the missing ffmpeg-rebuild from rpmfusion or any line specify "This combination does not appear to work"? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: libvpx issues, anyone?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:10 AM, sguazt wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Rares Aioanei > wrote: > > Hello folks, > > > > Does anyone except me had problems today with updating their F16 > systems? I > > seem to have dependency problems regarding ffmpeg-libs and/or libvpx. My > > repos are standard Fedora ones and rpmfusion. And 'yum clean all' did not > > help. > > > > I had this problem until few minutes ago as well. > Now it seems it has been fixed. > > > -- Marco > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > There is a problem with chromium, it uses the old version of libvpx. If you are using that personal repo, you need to wait until is rebuild (or delete the software), the mantainer say that it will be fixed ASAP (is in FOSDEM) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: libvpx issues, anyone?
On 03/02/12 13:06, Rares Aioanei wrote: Hello folks, Does anyone except me had problems today with updating their F16 systems? I seem to have dependency problems regarding ffmpeg-libs and/or libvpx. My repos are standard Fedora ones and rpmfusion. And 'yum clean all' did not help. Thanks, Take 10 minutes to read the archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2012-February/413232.html -- Regards, Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject UTF_8 Encoded -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: libvpx issues, anyone?
On 02/03/2012 02:10 PM, sguazt wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Rares Aioanei wrote: >> Hello folks, >> >> Does anyone except me had problems today with updating their F16 systems? I >> seem to have dependency problems regarding ffmpeg-libs and/or libvpx. My >> repos are standard Fedora ones and rpmfusion. And 'yum clean all' did not >> help. >> > > I had this problem until few minutes ago as well. > Now it seems it has been fixed. > > > -- Marco Oops, I don't have the impression! Still I get: Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:9.0.1-1.fc16 will be updated ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:10.0-1.fc16 will be an update ---> Package gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.x86_64 0:0.10.22-2.fc16.1 will be updated ---> Package gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.x86_64 0:0.10.22-2.fc16.2 will be an update ---> Package libvpx.x86_64 0:0.9.7.1-1.fc16 will be updated --> Processing Dependency: libvpx.so.0()(64bit) for package: ffmpeg-libs-0.8.8-1.fc16.x86_64 ---> Package libvpx.x86_64 0:1.0.0-1.fc16 will be an update ---> Package xulrunner.x86_64 0:9.0.1-1.fc16 will be updated ---> Package xulrunner.x86_64 0:10.0-1.fc16 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: ffmpeg-libs-0.8.8-1.fc16.x86_64 (@rpmfusion-free-updates) Requires: libvpx.so.0()(64bit) Removing: libvpx-0.9.7.1-1.fc16.x86_64 (@updates-testing) libvpx.so.0()(64bit) Updated By: libvpx-1.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64 (updates) Not found -- Joachim Backes http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: libvpx issues, anyone?
Am 03.02.2012 14:06, schrieb Rares Aioanei: > Hello folks, > > Does anyone except me had problems today with updating their F16 systems? > I seem to have dependency problems regarding ffmpeg-libs and/or libvpx. > My repos are standard Fedora ones and rpmfusion. And 'yum clean all' did not > help. goggle has released libvpx-1.0 some days ago upcoming firefox for F15/F16 will be linked against the new vesion so rpmfusion has to rebuild their ffmpeg also against libvpx-1.0 since this is an external repo it will never be possible that all repos and mirrors have mathcing versions in case of so-name changes was tehre and since i am building ffmpeg + deps on my own because the rpmfusion-version is crippled due some license hickhack and the unwillness to move it to "nonfree"-repo and the are way too slow in updates at all looks like this after the updates are finished: [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -qa | grep ffmpeg ffmpeg-libs-0.7.11-2.fc15.20120202.rh.x86_64 ffmpeg-0.7.11-2.fc15.20120202.rh.x86_64 [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -qa | grep libvpx libvpx-1.0.0-2.fc15.20120202.rh.x86_64 [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -qa | grep xulrunner xulrunner-10.0-1.fc15.x86_64 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: libvpx issues, anyone?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Rares Aioanei wrote: > Hello folks, > > Does anyone except me had problems today with updating their F16 systems? I > seem to have dependency problems regarding ffmpeg-libs and/or libvpx. My > repos are standard Fedora ones and rpmfusion. And 'yum clean all' did not > help. > I had this problem until few minutes ago as well. Now it seems it has been fixed. -- Marco -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
libvpx issues, anyone?
Hello folks, Does anyone except me had problems today with updating their F16 systems? I seem to have dependency problems regarding ffmpeg-libs and/or libvpx. My repos are standard Fedora ones and rpmfusion. And 'yum clean all' did not help. Thanks, -- Rares Aioanei -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
