Re: Scan does not work on either F-16 box -
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:45:46 -0500, BG (Bob) wrote: > [bobg@box6 ~]$ rpm -qa \*sane\* > libsane-hpaio-3.11.12-1.fc16.x86_64 > sane-backends-drivers-cameras-1.0.22-8.fc16.x86_64 > xsane-0.998-4.fc16.x86_64 > sane-backends-libs-1.0.22-8.fc16.x86_64 > xsane-common-0.998-4.fc16.x86_64 > sane-backends-1.0.22-8.fc16.x86_64 yum -y install sane-backends-drivers-scanners There's something in the package dependencies that doesn't look correct. Since the split-off of the -cameras and -scanners subpackages, nothing depends on these separate packages anymore. They are installed only for the default GNOME Desktop Spin via the "comps" file. -- Fedora release 16 (Verne) - Linux 3.2.7-1.fc16.x86_64 loadavg: 0.03 0.07 0.13 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [SOLVED ... kinda? :] Re: xsane problem - also hp-setup w/ hp7510
On 2/23/2012 5:03 AM, Tim Waugh wrote: On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 22:24 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote: And, given that I currently trying the hp-setup approach using material in the Fedora repository (if that is the correct word), I am seeing that, as root, I get nothing for lpinfo. And one of the suggestions in the document is to run that to see what you get. The document doesn't address "what happens if you can print but lpinfo/lpstat provide nothing. I've just updated that section. See what you think. Tim. */ Tim: I appreciate your listening to this list to add more info to the debug page and see the section about what to do if lpinfo doesn't give an lp info. But I can't see from the doc (okay, its late and maybe I am tired and missing it) what to do to get lpinfo et al to work. I think there needs to be a section of "if you used hp-setup", you need to do these other things. Yes, I know this is HP specific, but hp-setup is yum-able (is there a right word to describe "something that can be gotten through yum"?) and it seems like there is missing info about what might have fallen through the cracks. Is this a conversation to take offline ... I am probably boring everyone who doesn't have an HP to tears. Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
On 2/23/2012 2:30 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2012/02/23 12:01, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/23/2012 10:20 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
To me, that's pretty much a case of being off Windows except when its
the right tool.
Not everybody *can* be 100% Windows free. My post was to show that
under the
right circumstances it's not only possible, it's easy. And, as far as
Totem
goes, there are other media programs that might work. Have you tried
them?
Some programs will never appear on Open Source platforms, Joe. There
are no
talented programmers interested in putting the programs on Open Source
with
no income while they do it. Nobody is willing to pay the programmers
to move
the programs to Open Source. These are typically niche market
programs. They
often have a long Windows or Apple legacy, though. And they are the bread
and butter for the people who distribute them. So being 100% windows
or Apple
free is a forlorn hope if you want to include "everybody". (And what's
this
nonsense of only worrying about Windows free? Apple is "good guys", hunh?
Let's hear people giving Apple equal time to Windows for their hatred.)
{^_-}
I agree with this.
Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
To all: Thanks for suggestions for vlc and mplayer. Will try both and see what I get. Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Making a shared library executable outside the shell
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 08:33 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Christopher Svanefalk > wrote: > > I have built Chromium from source, and currently the only way to start the > > browser is to execute the shared library file 'chrome' from shell. > > > > I would like to be able to launch it from the normal menu like my other > > applications, but I do not really know how to do this. Simply creating a > > symlink in bin breaks dependencies (browser crashes due to inability to load > > related libraries), and I am not really good enough at shell-work to figure > > out what else could be done. It is further not possible to launch the file > > from a normal file browser (system reports that it has no application for > > handling shared libraries). > > > > Any solution to this? > > The Chromium source distribution should contain a shell script to > start Chromium. Google's official builds include this in > /opt/google/chrome and hardlink it to /usr/bin/google-chrome to start > the browser. This is done as part of the build process even for > non-official builds, so it's very strange you don't have it. > > You can find the wrapper script in the Chromium source distribution here: > http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/tools/build/linux/chrome-wrapper?view=markup > > Simply copy it to the main Chrome directory and then hardlink it to /usr/bin. I *think* the OP is asking how to run Chromium from a desktop menu, but it's hard to be sure. And he doesn't mention which desktop. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 22:52, Alchemist wrote: >> I like VLC, however I would also suggest trying mplayer. Its just way >> too awesome. :) >> > > it is also much more better then VLC, due less cpu/memory work. Just > take a good GUI and play Well I wouldn't go that far as much better. There are many problems with mplayer too. I have faced slow rendering sometimes because mplayer failed to properly recognise the hardware. What I hate most is the complete lack of playing multiple streams. This ruins the experience for me when I want to play a concept album like "The Wall". Of course the work around there is to play an audio CD and not tracks in separate files. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
On 2012/02/23 14:58, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/23/2012 02:30 PM, jdow wrote:
Some programs will never appear on Open Source platforms, Joe.
So? Rhythmbox, Anorak and Parole are all in the repos, and there are probably
others there that work. One of the glories of Open Source is that there's almost
always a free alternative to any program you need if the one you like stops
working.
The Linux based alternative to Medialon (a show control program) is neither
free nor supported anymore. (The author died.) The program is a specialized
process control program with features customized for theatrical or venue
presentations and equipment using DMX protocol. People purchase it rather
than use any alternatives out there now that Loren has retired ShowMan.
That's just one example of a small niche that may never be entirely able to
go Open Source. (There is at least one person trying to enter the field with
Open Source as of a decade ago. I've not heard anything of his program for
the last 8 years or so.)
It's must safer to say "Most people can become entirely Open Source." That
sounds better than "Microsoft free" with no mention of also being "Apple
free." Technically people who use Apples can be "Microsoft free", too. But
they are still paying through the nose for (stuff I can't use. I seem
to be "Apple challenged". I simply can't make the famn dool things work to
do what I want to do when I want to do it.)
{^_-}
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: degraded array at reboot
Jeffrey Ross writes: system is running Fedora 16 with RAID 1 upon a reboot some but not all of the partitions come up as degraded and This appears to be a recurring bug, that's yet to be identified. This happens sometimes if you do not have all RAID UUIDs enumerated on the kernel boot command line. Add any missing raid UUIDs to /etc/default/grub, there should be a "rd.md.uuid=UUID" for each one of your RAID (not partition) UUIDs. Rerun grub2-mkconfig to update your grub.cfg. pgpbCIeXjrvSX.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Grub? Grub2?
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > Now I wonder. When I run : file - < /dev/sda > The output dose not have the string: GRUB version 0.94 > but in /boot/grub2 there is a grub.cfg and there is no grub.conf > in /boot/grub nor is there a grub-install. > > So what am I to conclude about booting? Apparently, `file` doesn't recognize GRUB2 yet, as it outputs no information about what sort of bootloader is installed. My system, which I'm absolutely certain uses GRUB2 (it says so in the menu ;-), says: /dev/stdin: x86 boot sector; partition 1: ID=0x83, starthead 32, startsector 2048, 1024000 sectors; partition 2: ID=0x7, active, starthead 221, startsector 1026048, 8192 sectors; partition 3: ID=0x8e, starthead 254, startsector 82946048, 1167316992 sectors, code offset 0x63, OEM-ID " м", Bytes/sector 190, sectors/cluster 124, reserved sectors 191, FATs 6, root entries 185, sectors 64514 (volumes <=32 MB) , Media descriptor 0xf3, sectors/FAT 20644, heads 6, hidden sectors 309755, sectors 2147991229 (volumes > 32 MB) , physical drive 0x7e, dos < 4.0 BootSector (0x0) So, no info probably means GRUB2. -T.C. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
On 02/23/2012 02:30 PM, jdow wrote: Some programs will never appear on Open Source platforms, Joe. So? Rhythmbox, Anorak and Parole are all in the repos, and there are probably others there that work. One of the glories of Open Source is that there's almost always a free alternative to any program you need if the one you like stops working. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to keep a particular kernel version?
> > De: M A Young >Para: Community support for Fedora users >Enviado: Jueves, 23 de febrero, 2012 15:29:49 >Asunto: Re: How to keep a particular kernel version? > >On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, enclair wrote: > >> I have these three kernels: 3.1.9, 3.2.5 and 3.2.6 >> There is a new kernel in -updates (3.2.7). >> If I update to the new kernel, yum will want to remove 3.1.9. >> Is there a possibility to set up yum to keep the older kernel (3.1.9) and to >> remove 3.2.5 instead (the middle one)? >> (There is the possibility to remove the middle kernel before each updates, >> but it's not really convenient). > >You could make sure you are running on the kernel you want to keep as yum >won't remove the running kernel. > > Michael Young >-- users mailing list >users@lists.fedoraproject.org >To unsubscribe or change subscription options: >https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users >Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > > > Yum is configured to keep 3 kernels. If you remove the middle one 3.2.5 manually, when yum runs it shouldn't remove any kernels since you only have 2. Alternately, you can configure yum to keep more than 3 kernels. But that will take up more disk space unnecessarily. DK -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Scan does not work on either F-16 box -
On 23/02/12 17:24, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:13:23 -0500, BG (Bob) wrote: [bobg@box6 ~]$ /var/log/message bash: /var/log/message: No such file or directory It's /var/log/messagessorry for the typo in my earlier reply. Have you really not taken a look at that file before? Ok, /var/log/messages most recent stuff but I tried xsane at 17:43:30 and nothing shows after the last line below: Feb 23 17:37:41 box6 dbus-daemon[765]: dbus[765]: [system] Activating service name='net.reactivated.Fprint' (using servicehelper) Feb 23 17:37:41 box6 dbus[765]: [system] Activating service name='net.reactivated.Fprint' (using servicehelper) Feb 23 17:37:41 box6 dbus-daemon[765]: Launching FprintObject Feb 23 17:37:41 box6 dbus-daemon[765]: dbus[765]: [system] Successfully activated service 'net.reactivated.Fprint' Feb 23 17:37:41 box6 dbus[765]: [system] Successfully activated service 'net.reactivated.Fprint' Feb 23 17:37:41 box6 dbus-daemon[765]: ** Message: D-Bus service launched with name: net.reactivated.Fprint Feb 23 17:37:41 box6 dbus-daemon[765]: ** Message: entering main loop Feb 23 17:38:12 box6 dbus-daemon[765]: ** Message: No devices in use, exit Something here: [bobg@box6 ~]$ rpm -qa \*sane xsane-0.998-4.fc16.x86_64 I guess that just shows that xsane is there? rpm -qa \*sane\* is the command I suggested. Alternatively: rpm -qa|grep sane Sorry, I copy/pasted and didn't get the entire command - [bobg@box6 ~]$ rpm -qa \*sane\* libsane-hpaio-3.11.12-1.fc16.x86_64 sane-backends-drivers-cameras-1.0.22-8.fc16.x86_64 xsane-0.998-4.fc16.x86_64 sane-backends-libs-1.0.22-8.fc16.x86_64 xsane-common-0.998-4.fc16.x86_64 sane-backends-1.0.22-8.fc16.x86_64 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Grub? Grub2?
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 10:51 -0800, Scott Doty wrote: > On 02/23/2012 10:26 AM, Jeffrey Ross wrote: > > This is a system that was upgraded from F15 to F16 via Yum, how can I do: > > > > 1) confirm which version of grub was used to boot the system > > # file - < /dev/sda > > The dash is important -- tells file(1) to read from stdin. Example: > > _[/root]_(root@atom)_ > # file - < /dev/sda > /dev/stdin: x86 boot sector; GRand Unified Bootloader, stage1 version > 0x3, boot drive 0x80, 1st sector stage2 0x138800, GRUB version 0.94; > partition 1: ID=0x83, active, starthead 32, startsector 2048, 1572864 > sectors; partition 2: ID=0x82, starthead 8, startsector 1574912, 1048576 > sectors; partition 3: ID=0x83, starthead 77, startsector 2623488, > 56002560 sectors, code offset 0x48 > > > 2) re-install the boot record (MBR?) for the version of grub I'm running > > onto a replacement drive? > > > > > > Take a look at grub2-install or grub-install, depending on what you have > installed. > > -Scott > Now I wonder. When I run : file - < /dev/sda The output dose not have the string: GRUB version 0.94 but in /boot/grub2 there is a grub.cfg and there is no grub.conf in /boot/grub nor is there a grub-install. So what am I to conclude about booting? -- === You can tell the ideals of a nation by its advertisements. -- Norman Douglas === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
On 2012/02/23 12:01, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/23/2012 10:20 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
To me, that's pretty much a case of being off Windows except when its
the right tool.
Not everybody *can* be 100% Windows free. My post was to show that under the
right circumstances it's not only possible, it's easy. And, as far as Totem
goes, there are other media programs that might work. Have you tried them?
Some programs will never appear on Open Source platforms, Joe. There are no
talented programmers interested in putting the programs on Open Source with
no income while they do it. Nobody is willing to pay the programmers to move
the programs to Open Source. These are typically niche market programs. They
often have a long Windows or Apple legacy, though. And they are the bread
and butter for the people who distribute them. So being 100% windows or Apple
free is a forlorn hope if you want to include "everybody". (And what's this
nonsense of only worrying about Windows free? Apple is "good guys", hunh?
Let's hear people giving Apple equal time to Windows for their hatred.)
{^_-}
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Scan does not work on either F-16 box -
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:13:23 -0500, BG (Bob) wrote: > > [bobg@box6 ~]$ /var/log/message > bash: /var/log/message: No such file or directory It's /var/log/messagessorry for the typo in my earlier reply. Have you really not taken a look at that file before? > Something here: > > > [bobg@box6 ~]$ rpm -qa \*sane > xsane-0.998-4.fc16.x86_64 > > I guess that just shows that xsane is there? rpm -qa \*sane\* is the command I suggested. Alternatively: rpm -qa|grep sane -- Fedora release 16 (Verne) - Linux 3.2.7-1.fc16.x86_64 loadavg: 0.31 0.40 0.39 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Sound Broken By Some Update?
For a few days now, I'm having trouble with sound on my machine. I'm running a fully up to date F16, with KDE. This seems to have started on the 20th, and I'm seeing errors like this in the logs: Feb 20 10:58:24 rghquad rtkit-daemon[1501]: Successfully made thread 2834 of process 2834 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by '500' high priority at nice level -11. Feb 20 10:58:24 rghquad pulseaudio[2834]: module-udev-detect.c: inotify_init1() failed: Too many open files Feb 20 10:58:24 rghquad pulseaudio[2834]: module.c: Failed to load module "module-udev-detect" (argument: ""): initialization failed. Feb 20 10:58:24 rghquad pulseaudio[2834]: main.c: Module load failed. Feb 20 10:58:24 rghquad pulseaudio[2834]: main.c: Failed to initialize daemon. Feb 20 10:58:24 rghquad rtkit-daemon[1501]: Successfully made thread 2895 of process 2895 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by '500' high priority at nice level -11. Feb 20 10:58:24 rghquad pulseaudio[2895]: module-udev-detect.c: inotify_init1() failed: Too many open files Feb 20 10:58:24 rghquad pulseaudio[2895]: module.c: Failed to load module "module-udev-detect" (argument: ""): initialization failed. Feb 20 10:58:24 rghquad pulseaudio[2895]: main.c: Module load failed. Feb 20 10:58:24 rghquad pulseaudio[2895]: main.c: Failed to initialize daemon. Feb 20 10:58:24 rghquad rtkit-daemon[1501]: Successfully made thread 2930 of process 2930 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by '500' high priority at nice level -11. Attempts to start pulseaudio manually cause the same errors, initially, but then it eventually works, giving me only this error: /home/rgheck/ > pulseaudio E: bluetooth-util.c: Error from ListAdapters reply: org.freedesktop.systemd1.LoadFailed Nothing's changed with the soundcard, which is fairly basic: 08:01.0 Multimedia audio controller: C-Media Electronics Inc CM8738 (rev 10) Ideas? Richard -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Scan does not work on either F-16 box -
On 23/02/12 16:35, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:09:25 -0500, BG (Bob) wrote: this is an up to date F-16/64 bit computer. I reported last week that my trusty HP 5370 scanner didn't work, finally concluding that it must have met it's end. Today I received a new Canon LIDE 110 which according to a Sane list I found is supposed to work. It does not, lsusb shows: The Canon LIDE 110 is a scanner that does work with F-16 x86_64. Help would be greatly appreciated. Anything suspicious in /var/log/message about the scanner? What do you get for "rpm -qa \*sane\*"? Yes, I consulted a compatibility list and based the selection of the Canon on that. There's little doubt the HP will still work too once we find the cause of the problem. The HP has a separate power supply [wall wart]. I was surprised to see that the canon depends on USB for power, I didn't realize that when I ordered it but they seem to think it works. Nothing here? [bobg@box6 ~]$ /var/log/message bash: /var/log/message: No such file or directory Something here: [bobg@box6 ~]$ rpm -qa \*sane xsane-0.998-4.fc16.x86_64 I guess that just shows that xsane is there? Bob -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
2012/2/23 suvayu ali : > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 20:06, Paul Allen Newell wrote: >>> I'd suggest using VLC from RPMFusion. I've never come across anything >>> it couldn't play, which is why I've always used it, even on Windows. >>> ;-) >> >> >> Let me take a look at this as I am not happy with the total lack of response >> from the Totem developers and wouldn't find migrating to something different > > I like VLC, however I would also suggest trying mplayer. Its just way > too awesome. :) > > -- > Suvayu > > Open source is the future. It sets us free. > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org it is also much more better then VLC, due less cpu/memory work. Just take a good GUI and play -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: f16 x86_64 :: iptraf-ng
On 02/23/2012 01:44 PM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: Does anyone have an working iptraf? I have the latest version from updates and it crashes .. i got from gdb the following backtrace : (gdb) bt #0 0x003e96836285 in __GI_raise (sig=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64 #1 0x003e96837b9b in __GI_abort () at abort.c:91 #2 0x003e96875fae in __libc_message (do_abort=2, fmt=0x3e96974b98 "*** glibc detected *** %s: %s: 0x%s ***\n") at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/libc_fatal.c:198 #3 0x003e9687c2d6 in malloc_printerr (action=3, str=0x3e96974d38 "double free or corruption (!prev)", ptr=) at malloc.c:5021 #4 0x003e9687d5be in _int_free (av=0x3e96baf700, p=0x87ebf0, have_lock=0) at malloc.c:3942 #5 0x00404517 in tx_operatemenu (menu=0x7fffdf50, position=0x7fffdf40, aborted=) at tui/menurt.c:209 #6 0x00410d86 in program_interface (options=0x7fffe100, opt=, optarg=, facilitytime=) at iptraf.c:199 #7 0x0040315f in main (argc=, argv=0x7fffe298) at iptraf.c:567 Any idea about the problem? Is is a know bug? iptraf-ng-1.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64 works for me. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - "I'd explain it to you, but your brain might explode." - -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
f16 x86_64 :: iptraf-ng
Does anyone have an working iptraf? I have the latest version from updates and it crashes .. i got from gdb the following backtrace : (gdb) bt #0 0x003e96836285 in __GI_raise (sig=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64 #1 0x003e96837b9b in __GI_abort () at abort.c:91 #2 0x003e96875fae in __libc_message (do_abort=2, fmt=0x3e96974b98 "*** glibc detected *** %s: %s: 0x%s ***\n") at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/libc_fatal.c:198 #3 0x003e9687c2d6 in malloc_printerr (action=3, str=0x3e96974d38 "double free or corruption (!prev)", ptr=) at malloc.c:5021 #4 0x003e9687d5be in _int_free (av=0x3e96baf700, p=0x87ebf0, have_lock=0) at malloc.c:3942 #5 0x00404517 in tx_operatemenu (menu=0x7fffdf50, position=0x7fffdf40, aborted=) at tui/menurt.c:209 #6 0x00410d86 in program_interface (options=0x7fffe100, opt=, optarg=, facilitytime=) at iptraf.c:199 #7 0x0040315f in main (argc=, argv=0x7fffe298) at iptraf.c:567 Any idea about the problem? Is is a know bug? Thanks! Adrian smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 20:06, Paul Allen Newell wrote: >> I'd suggest using VLC from RPMFusion. I've never come across anything >> it couldn't play, which is why I've always used it, even on Windows. >> ;-) > > > Let me take a look at this as I am not happy with the total lack of response > from the Totem developers and wouldn't find migrating to something different I like VLC, however I would also suggest trying mplayer. Its just way too awesome. :) -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Scan does not work on either F-16 box -
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:09:25 -0500, BG (Bob) wrote: > > > this is an up to date F-16/64 bit computer. I reported last week > that my trusty HP 5370 scanner didn't work, finally concluding > that it must have met it's end. Today I received a new Canon > LIDE 110 which according to a Sane list I found is supposed to > work. It does not, lsusb shows: The Canon LIDE 110 is a scanner that does work with F-16 x86_64. > Help would be greatly appreciated. Anything suspicious in /var/log/message about the scanner? What do you get for "rpm -qa \*sane\*"? -- Fedora release 16 (Verne) - Linux 3.2.7-1.fc16.x86_64 loadavg: 0.23 0.19 0.18 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to keep a particular kernel version?
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, enclair wrote: I have these three kernels: 3.1.9, 3.2.5 and 3.2.6 There is a new kernel in -updates (3.2.7). If I update to the new kernel, yum will want to remove 3.1.9. Is there a possibility to set up yum to keep the older kernel (3.1.9) and to remove 3.2.5 instead (the middle one)? (There is the possibility to remove the middle kernel before each updates, but it's not really convenient). You could make sure you are running on the kernel you want to keep as yum won't remove the running kernel. Michael Young -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Grub? Grub2?
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Jeffrey Ross wrote: > Thanks... system responded: > > > which means it was GRUB not GRUB2, and a reinstall should simply be > "grub-install /dev/sdX" > > However the binaries for grub 0.94 are not installed on the system but > rather the binaries for grub2 (1.99) and yum doesn't seem to want to let > me install the older version of grub. That's because grub2 obsoletes grub. You'll have to uninstall grub2 and manually install the GRUB1 RPM: i686: http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/16/Everything/i386/os/Packages/grub-0.97-84.fc16.i686.rpm x86_64: http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/16/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/grub-0.97-84.fc16.x86_64.rpm > Last time I tried to upgrade I ran into problems so I'm hesitant to > upgrade to grub2 > > I think my problem was /boot and / are on raid 1 partitions, root is on a > raid partition with a superblock of 1.1, /boot is on a superblock of 0.90 > > I need to get grub reinstalled on /dev/sdb > > Thanks, Jeff -T.C. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Scan does not work on either F-16 box -
On 02/23/2012 12:09 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: I suppose that it's possible that the required driver is not included in Fedora-16 but I don't know how to determine what is, at least I haven't yet. You probably want to check the Linux hardware compatibility lists at http://www.linux-drivers.org/ because if you need a special driver, there's probably a link to it. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F16 Live install to 2nd hard disk, grub failure
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 14:53 -0500, Wade Hampton wrote: > On a Dell 745 with WinXP on the first disk, we > added a second disk (SATA) and tried installing > Fedora 16 i386 from the live CD to the second disk. If you want the system to boot from the second disk, you probably need to change the boot device order in the BIOS. --Greg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[Solved] Re: Fedora 16 Stuck on Welcome Screen
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:47 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth < tchollingswo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:40 AM, J.T. Blaylock > wrote: > > It works! Thanks all. I think next time I'll try my hand at adding the > repos > > and getting the drivers during install. > > There are instructions for doing that here: > http://rpmfusion.org/EnablingRpmFusionDuringFedoraInstall > > -T.C. > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > Thanks. It's nice that my dumb wireless stick is now supported out of the box. It would be nicer if I would go buy a less dumb wireless card, *stares longingly at Intel page* or 802.11ac would get here with Linux drivers. Or if I could live somewhere where I could have a wired gigabit net to all my machines. Wishful thinking I'm sure. :) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Grub? Grub2?
> On 02/23/2012 10:26 AM, Jeffrey Ross wrote: >> This is a system that was upgraded from F15 to F16 via Yum, how can I >> do: >> >> 1) confirm which version of grub was used to boot the system > > # file - < /dev/sda > > The dash is important -- tells file(1) to read from stdin. Example: > > _[/root]_(root@atom)_ > # file - < /dev/sda > /dev/stdin: x86 boot sector; GRand Unified Bootloader, stage1 version > 0x3, boot drive 0x80, 1st sector stage2 0x138800, GRUB version 0.94; > partition 1: ID=0x83, active, starthead 32, startsector 2048, 1572864 > sectors; partition 2: ID=0x82, starthead 8, startsector 1574912, 1048576 > sectors; partition 3: ID=0x83, starthead 77, startsector 2623488, > 56002560 sectors, code offset 0x48 > >> 2) re-install the boot record (MBR?) for the version of grub I'm running >> onto a replacement drive? >> >> > > Take a look at grub2-install or grub-install, depending on what you have > installed. > > -Scott Thanks... system responded: /dev/stdin: x86 boot sector; GRand Unified Bootloader, stage1 version 0x3, boot drive 0x80, 1st sector stage2 0x3c0e298, GRUB version 0.94; partition 1: ID=0xfd, starthead 32, startsector 2048, 16580608 sectors; partition 2: ID=0xfd, starthead 254, startsector 16582656, 1536 sectors; partition 3: ID=0xfd, starthead 254, startsector 31942656, 1536 sectors; partition 4: ID=0x5, starthead 254, startsector 47302656, 274368512 sectors, code offset 0x48 which means it was GRUB not GRUB2, and a reinstall should simply be "grub-install /dev/sdX" However the binaries for grub 0.94 are not installed on the system but rather the binaries for grub2 (1.99) and yum doesn't seem to want to let me install the older version of grub. Last time I tried to upgrade I ran into problems so I'm hesitant to upgrade to grub2 I think my problem was /boot and / are on raid 1 partitions, root is on a raid partition with a superblock of 1.1, /boot is on a superblock of 0.90 I need to get grub reinstalled on /dev/sdb Thanks, Jeff -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Scan does not work on either F-16 box -
this is an up to date F-16/64 bit computer. I reported last week that my trusty HP 5370 scanner didn't work, finally concluding that it must have met it's end. Today I received a new Canon LIDE 110 which according to a Sane list I found is supposed to work. It does not, lsusb shows: [bobg@box6 ~]$ lsusb Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110 Bus 002 Device 002: ID 046d:c408 Logitech, Inc. Marble Mouse (4-button) Fedora still reports "no devices available" the same as with the HP 5370. I suppose that it's possible that the required driver is not included in Fedora-16 but I don't know how to determine what is, at least I haven't yet. This is one of those things that usually just works and now it's becoming a science project! Am I the only one with this problem. I have two F-16/64 computers and both respond the same way. Help would be greatly appreciated. Bob -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
On 02/23/2012 10:20 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: To me, that's pretty much a case of being off Windows except when its the right tool. Not everybody *can* be 100% Windows free. My post was to show that under the right circumstances it's not only possible, it's easy. And, as far as Totem goes, there are other media programs that might work. Have you tried them? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
F16 Live install to 2nd hard disk, grub failure
On a Dell 745 with WinXP on the first disk, we added a second disk (SATA) and tried installing Fedora 16 i386 from the live CD to the second disk. During the install, the boot loader (grub) install was automatic with no prompts. After the install, the system still boots into Windows. Grub was installed on the 2nd disk, but must not have changed the MBR of the first disk. Toggling the bootable partition on the first disk did not fix the problem (no bootable partition was found when booting). Anyone have any ideas on this? For now, I am using the full version of Fedora which should properly install grub. Cheers, -- Wade Hampton -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to keep a particular kernel version?
I was wrong. Le 23 février 2012 20:20, T.C. Hollingsworth a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:51 AM, enclair wrote: > > Yes I could do that, thank you. > > (However, it must be set to "keep" I think, not "0", according to man > > yum.conf). > > "keep" is a value set in the YUM database. "0" is what you set > installonly_limit to prevent YUM from removing installonly packages. > > From the manpage, note the added emphasis: > > installonly_limit > Number of packages listed in installonlypkgs to keep installed at the > same time. __Setting to 0 disables this feature.__ Default is '3'. > Note that this functionality used to be in the "installonlyn" > plugin, where this option was altered via. tokeep. Note that as of > version 3.2.24, yum will now __look in the yumdb__ for a installonly > attribute on installed packages. If __that attribute is "keep",__ > then they will never be removed. > > -T.C. > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to keep a particular kernel version?
On 23/02/12 18:07, enclair wrote: Hi, I have these three kernels: 3.1.9, 3.2.5 and 3.2.6 There is a new kernel in -updates (3.2.7). If I update to the new kernel, yum will want to remove 3.1.9. Is there a possibility to set up yum to keep the older kernel (3.1.9) Get a copy of the kernel you want to to keep from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/ search kernel Put it some-place safe, then when yum removes it, you just reinstall it. -- Regards, Frank "Jack of all, fubars" -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to keep a particular kernel version?
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:51 AM, enclair wrote: > Yes I could do that, thank you. > (However, it must be set to "keep" I think, not "0", according to man > yum.conf). "keep" is a value set in the YUM database. "0" is what you set installonly_limit to prevent YUM from removing installonly packages. From the manpage, note the added emphasis: installonly_limit Number of packages listed in installonlypkgs to keep installed at the same time. __Setting to 0 disables this feature.__ Default is '3'. Note that this functionality used to be in the "installonlyn" plugin, where this option was altered via. tokeep. Note that as of version 3.2.24, yum will now __look in the yumdb__ for a installonly attribute on installed packages. If __that attribute is "keep",__ then they will never be removed. -T.C. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
On 2/23/2012 10:42 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: Note that I could care less whether or not you use Windows. I just noticed some things that might make your Linux experience better, if you so desire. :-) T.C.: Noted and comments taken as such (smile) [re: Totem] I'd suggest using VLC from RPMFusion. I've never come across anything it couldn't play, which is why I've always used it, even on Windows. ;-) Let me take a look at this as I am not happy with the total lack of response from the Totem developers and wouldn't find migrating to something different Turbo Tax is Windows and, though I only need it once a year, I need it. Have you tried using the online version? It works great for most use cases (unless you happen to be in a gay marriage, or some other weird edge cases where I wouldn't trust TurboTax in the first place) and works with any operating system. I haven't used the software version in years, and don't miss it one bit. I've got friends that use it and they say it seems to be maturing to a good point. I haven't looked at it since I got the sense it doesn't handle things like stocks and income other than "salary". Turbo Tax hasn't given me too much grief. Appreciate the suggestions, Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to keep a particular kernel version?
Yes I could do that, thank you. (However, it must be set to "keep" I think, not "0", according to man yum.conf). Le 23 février 2012 19:13, T.C. Hollingsworth a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:07 AM, enclair wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have these three kernels: 3.1.9, 3.2.5 and 3.2.6 > > There is a new kernel in -updates (3.2.7). > > If I update to the new kernel, yum will want to remove 3.1.9. > > Is there a possibility to set up yum to keep the older kernel (3.1.9) > and to > > remove 3.2.5 instead (the middle one)? > > (There is the possibility to remove the middle kernel before each > updates, > > but it's not really convenient). > > You could change the installonly_limit in /etc/yum.conf. If you set > it to 0, yum won't remove any kernels when a new one is installed. > You could then remove unwanted ones manually at your convenience. > > -T.C. > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Grub? Grub2?
On 02/23/2012 10:26 AM, Jeffrey Ross wrote: This is a system that was upgraded from F15 to F16 via Yum, how can I do: 1) confirm which version of grub was used to boot the system # file - < /dev/sda The dash is important -- tells file(1) to read from stdin. Example: _[/root]_(root@atom)_ # file - < /dev/sda /dev/stdin: x86 boot sector; GRand Unified Bootloader, stage1 version 0x3, boot drive 0x80, 1st sector stage2 0x138800, GRUB version 0.94; partition 1: ID=0x83, active, starthead 32, startsector 2048, 1572864 sectors; partition 2: ID=0x82, starthead 8, startsector 1574912, 1048576 sectors; partition 3: ID=0x83, starthead 77, startsector 2623488, 56002560 sectors, code offset 0x48 2) re-install the boot record (MBR?) for the version of grub I'm running onto a replacement drive? Take a look at grub2-install or grub-install, depending on what you have installed. -Scott -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 16 Stuck on Welcome Screen
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:40 AM, J.T. Blaylock wrote: > It works! Thanks all. I think next time I'll try my hand at adding the repos > and getting the drivers during install. There are instructions for doing that here: http://rpmfusion.org/EnablingRpmFusionDuringFedoraInstall -T.C. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
Note that I could care less whether or not you use Windows. I just noticed some things that might make your Linux experience better, if you so desire. :-) On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > Joe: > > With the introduction of F16, Totem either crashes or misplays (I've > submitted bugs ... never heard back). There's a limit to how long I'll keep > one machine on F14, so Windows will become media machine until Totem is > fixes (or, if not Totem, whatever is the problem underneath). I'd suggest using VLC from RPMFusion. I've never come across anything it couldn't play, which is why I've always used it, even on Windows. ;-) > Turbo Tax is Windows and, though I only need it once a year, I need it. Have you tried using the online version? It works great for most use cases (unless you happen to be in a gay marriage, or some other weird edge cases where I wouldn't trust TurboTax in the first place) and works with any operating system. I haven't used the software version in years, and don't miss it one bit. > Cygwin has always been good to have around for test ports to see if its > compiler looks at things differently (yes, it does, especially on > optimization). > > Still bump into the occasional website that works better under Windows/IE. > > To me, that's pretty much a case of being off Windows except when its the > right tool. > > Paul -T.C. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 16 Stuck on Welcome Screen
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2012 7:16 AM, "Greg Woods" wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 05:28 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> >
> > > Oh, let me join the game: "systemd.unit=multi-user.taret". (the
> "multi-" as
> > > opposed to "mult-"...). Who's next? :-D
> >
> > OK, why not? That's "systemd.unit=multi-user.target" ("target" as
> > opposed to "taret" :-)
> >
> > The fact that so many typos are being made shows that this is pretty
> > clunky syntax.
> >
> > --Greg
> >
> >
> > --
> > users mailing list
> > users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
> Or, it shows my poor proofreading and clunky, overeager use of my phone's
> touch keyboard. Thanks for the correction.
>
> I believe appending "3" still works, but why not offer a more
> self-descriptive, less depricated option? This is a rhetorical question,
> let's not hijack the thread.
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
> It works! Thanks all. I think next time I'll try my hand at adding the
repos and getting the drivers during install.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Grub? Grub2?
This is a system that was upgraded from F15 to F16 via Yum, how can I do: 1) confirm which version of grub was used to boot the system 2) re-install the boot record (MBR?) for the version of grub I'm running onto a replacement drive? Thanks, Jeff -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [SOLVED ... kinda? :] Re: xsane problem - also hp-setup w/ hp7510
On 2/23/2012 5:03 AM, Tim Waugh wrote: On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 22:24 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote: And, given that I currently trying the hp-setup approach using material in the Fedora repository (if that is the correct word), I am seeing that, as root, I get nothing for lpinfo. And one of the suggestions in the document is to run that to see what you get. The document doesn't address "what happens if you can print but lpinfo/lpstat provide nothing. I've just updated that section. See what you think. Tim. */ Tim: Thanks, will look at it tonight Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
On 2/23/2012 12:14 AM, Joe Zeff wrote: I've been running strictly Linux since F9. The only time I'm at a computer running Windows is when I'm at my SF club playing a first-person shooter on one of the club's Windows boxes. Strictly speaking, my desktop is still dual boot, but I haven't booted into Win98SE in years, and don't expect to. Joe: With the introduction of F16, Totem either crashes or misplays (I've submitted bugs ... never heard back). There's a limit to how long I'll keep one machine on F14, so Windows will become media machine until Totem is fixes (or, if not Totem, whatever is the problem underneath). Turbo Tax is Windows and, though I only need it once a year, I need it. Cygwin has always been good to have around for test ports to see if its compiler looks at things differently (yes, it does, especially on optimization). Still bump into the occasional website that works better under Windows/IE. To me, that's pretty much a case of being off Windows except when its the right tool. Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to keep a particular kernel version?
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:07 AM, enclair wrote: > Hi, > > I have these three kernels: 3.1.9, 3.2.5 and 3.2.6 > There is a new kernel in -updates (3.2.7). > If I update to the new kernel, yum will want to remove 3.1.9. > Is there a possibility to set up yum to keep the older kernel (3.1.9) and to > remove 3.2.5 instead (the middle one)? > (There is the possibility to remove the middle kernel before each updates, > but it's not really convenient). You could change the installonly_limit in /etc/yum.conf. If you set it to 0, yum won't remove any kernels when a new one is installed. You could then remove unwanted ones manually at your convenience. -T.C. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
How to keep a particular kernel version?
Hi, I have these three kernels: 3.1.9, 3.2.5 and 3.2.6 There is a new kernel in -updates (3.2.7). If I update to the new kernel, yum will want to remove 3.1.9. Is there a possibility to set up yum to keep the older kernel (3.1.9) and to remove 3.2.5 instead (the middle one)? (There is the possibility to remove the middle kernel before each updates, but it's not really convenient). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 16 Stuck on Welcome Screen
On Feb 23, 2012 7:16 AM, "Greg Woods" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 05:28 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> > Oh, let me join the game: "systemd.unit=multi-user.taret". (the
"multi-" as
> > opposed to "mult-"...). Who's next? :-D
>
> OK, why not? That's "systemd.unit=multi-user.target" ("target" as
> opposed to "taret" :-)
>
> The fact that so many typos are being made shows that this is pretty
> clunky syntax.
>
> --Greg
>
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Or, it shows my poor proofreading and clunky, overeager use of my phone's
touch keyboard. Thanks for the correction.
I believe appending "3" still works, but why not offer a more
self-descriptive, less depricated option? This is a rhetorical question,
let's not hijack the thread.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
RE: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
Original Message Subject: Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux From: Alan Cox Date: Wed, February 22, 2012 5:25 pm To: Community support for Fedora users Cc: b...@borg1911.com On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:18:16 -0700 "Nex6" wrote: > > Here is the adobe link: > http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/02/adobe-and-google-partnering-for-flash-player-on-linux.html > > and it says they are changing APIs, and will support the current API/plugins > (11.2) for 5 years. > > and, Firefox et al will be free to use the new API and have flash To me this is a good thing - the new API's are far better designed for things like containing garbage code that's probably full of holes. Alan yea, in the long run this may be a very good thing. but, there may be some pain along the way. -Nex6 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server version 1.2.10.2 Testing
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of 389-ds-base-1.2.10.2. No new features were added after alpha 8, just many bug fixes. There are also 389-adminutil, 389-admin, and 389-dsgw packages in Testing. NEW: EL6 support Beginning with RHEL 6.2, the 389-ds-base package is included in the base OS. Therefore, the 389-ds-base package can no longer be provided via EPEL, due to RHEL/EPEL packaging restrictions. However, the 389 Project will still make the full 389-ds-base package available via http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/rmeggins/389-ds-base. See http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Download for more information. NEW: Issue Tracking System We have moved our ticket tracking system from the Red Hat Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=389 to our Fedora Hosted Trac https://fedorahosted.org/389. All of the old 389 bugs have been copied to Trac. All new bugs, feature requests, and tasks should be entered in Trac This link shows all of the issues fixed in the 1.2.10 branch - https://fedorahosted.org/389/report/12 NEW: Plugin Authors WARNING: Plugins should be made transaction aware so that they can be called from within a backend pre/post transaction plugin. Otherwise, attempting to perform an internal operation will cause a deadlock. See http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Plugins Installation yum install --enablerepo=updates-testing 389-ds # or for EPEL yum install --enablerepo=epel-testing [--enablerepo=epel-testing-389-ds-base] 389-ds setup-ds-admin.pl Upgrade yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing 389-ds-base idm-console-framework 389-admin 389-ds-console 389-admin-console 389-dsgw 389-adminutil # or for EPEL yum upgrade --enablerepo=epel-testing [--enablerepo=epel-testing-389-ds-base] 389-ds-base idm-console-framework 389-admin 389-ds-console 389-admin-console 389-dsgw 389-adminutil setup-ds-admin.pl -u How to Give Feedback The best way to provide feedback is via the Fedora Update system. * Go to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates * In the Search box in the upper right hand corner, type in the name of the package * In the list, find the version and release you are using (if you're not sure, use rpm -qi on your system) and click on the release * On the page for the update, scroll down to "Add a comment" and provide your input Or just send us an email to 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org Reporting Issues https://fedorahosted.org/389 More Information * Release Notes - http://port389.org/wiki/Release_Notes * Install_Guide - http://port389.org/wiki/Install_Guide * Download - http://port389.org/wiki/Download -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: F16 USB pass-through to VirtualBox
On 02/23/2012 11:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I can't remember if there's any check boxes to make it connect by > default but that should do it. After that, if the device is plugged in > when you start your guest it should automatically get connected. I'm > not sure what will happen if you start the guest first and then plug > in the USB device. If you start the guest first and then plug in the USB device it will get connected to the guest machine. I verified this earlier today. -- Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong. -- Dandemis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F16 USB pass-through to VirtualBox
On 02/23/2012 11:49 PM, Dave Close wrote: > I thought the same thing. As I read the documentation, that's exactly > what a filter is supposed to do. But I have a "blank" filter, which > claims it will connect any USB device, and that doesn't happen. My guest > doesn't see the device until I select it in the guest menu. It's that > problem which prompted my initial request for help. > > In my case, I have only one guest. I'm only running VBox because the > application won't run on a recent Fedora release and the hardware won't > work with an old release. Solution, run the old release as a guest under > the new release. But the application needs to use the flash drive. As Richard said, you can't use a blank filter for this. You need specific filters for the device that you want to automatically connect. I'd not used USB filters in a long time since in early implementations I found it buggy. So, today I verified that it works as expected if you have those specific filters defined. Ed -- Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong. -- Dandemis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F16 USB pass-through to VirtualBox
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Dave Close wrote: > I thought the same thing. As I read the documentation, that's exactly > what a filter is supposed to do. But I have a "blank" filter, which > claims it will connect any USB device, and that doesn't happen. My guest > doesn't see the device until I select it in the guest menu. It's that > problem which prompted my initial request for help. Perhaps the part that's confusing you is that a blank filter does not automatically grab the next inserted USB device. You have to tell it which device you want to use with the filter. If you *ALWAYS* want that USB device connected to a particular guest when it's running, then you should: 1. Plug it in 2. Run virtualbox and open the settings for the host 3. Add the USB device (not a blank filter, but the device itself). I can't remember if there's any check boxes to make it connect by default but that should do it. After that, if the device is plugged in when you start your guest it should automatically get connected. I'm not sure what will happen if you start the guest first and then plug in the USB device. DISCLAIMER: I can't verify this from work so this is from memory and I might be completely wrong :) Richard -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F16 USB pass-through to VirtualBox
Ed Greshko wrote: >I "think" I may know what you want > >What you need to do is define a "USB" filter. When the "guest" is >started or when the device matching the filter is plugged in it will be >automatically connected to the guest. > >Of course you need to be careful, if you have multiple guests you can't >have the same filters. I thought the same thing. As I read the documentation, that's exactly what a filter is supposed to do. But I have a "blank" filter, which claims it will connect any USB device, and that doesn't happen. My guest doesn't see the device until I select it in the guest menu. It's that problem which prompted my initial request for help. In my case, I have only one guest. I'm only running VBox because the application won't run on a recent Fedora release and the hardware won't work with an old release. Solution, run the old release as a guest under the new release. But the application needs to use the flash drive. -- Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA "Genius may have its limitations, d...@compata.com, +1 714 434 7359but stupidity is not thus dhcl...@alumni.caltech.edu handicapped." --Elbert Hubbard -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [389-users] Named log pipe + normal access log
On 02/23/2012 08:34 AM, Daniel Fenert wrote: Hi, I'd like to log to named pipe (just like said here: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Named_Pipe_Log_Script) for some live analysis and ALSO log to access log as usual. Is it possible? You would have to alter the named pipe log script to write the regular access log file itself - the server cannot write to two different access logs at the same time. I'd like to avoid logging everything via this script (I have 1GB logs every 20 minutes in peak hours on each slave). -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
[389-users] Named log pipe + normal access log
Hi, I'd like to log to named pipe (just like said here: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Named_Pipe_Log_Script) for some live analysis and ALSO log to access log as usual. Is it possible? I'd like to avoid logging everything via this script (I have 1GB logs every 20 minutes in peak hours on each slave). -- Daniel Fenert -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: Making a shared library executable outside the shell
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > I have built Chromium from source, and currently the only way to start the > browser is to execute the shared library file 'chrome' from shell. > > I would like to be able to launch it from the normal menu like my other > applications, but I do not really know how to do this. Simply creating a > symlink in bin breaks dependencies (browser crashes due to inability to load > related libraries), and I am not really good enough at shell-work to figure > out what else could be done. It is further not possible to launch the file > from a normal file browser (system reports that it has no application for > handling shared libraries). > > Any solution to this? The Chromium source distribution should contain a shell script to start Chromium. Google's official builds include this in /opt/google/chrome and hardlink it to /usr/bin/google-chrome to start the browser. This is done as part of the build process even for non-official builds, so it's very strange you don't have it. You can find the wrapper script in the Chromium source distribution here: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/tools/build/linux/chrome-wrapper?view=markup Simply copy it to the main Chrome directory and then hardlink it to /usr/bin. -T.C. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Policykit in fedora 16?
How can i register my application to policykit in fedora16? If i do so, will it ask for the root password as soon i start my application? thank you -- *Regards Shreyas.M * -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: degraded array at reboot
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:17:00 -0500, Jeffrey Ross wrote: > system is running Fedora 16 with RAID 1 > > upon a reboot some but not all of the partitions come up as degraded and > its always the same partitions on the same disk (/dev/sda) /dev/md2, > /dev/md6, and /dev/md7 (/usr, /boot, & /home respectively, /, /var, and > swap mount with no issue) > > config files are: > > $ cat /etc/mdadm.conf > # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda > MAILADDR root > AUTO +imsm +1.x -all > ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=2 > UUID=f7d27973:c1e3562c:c97c2b84:778f9f47 > ARRAY /dev/md1 level=raid1 num-devices=2 > UUID=e36e8193:d486ae1b:d9d2d364:ba744b1a > ARRAY /dev/md2 level=raid1 num-devices=2 > UUID=0bd93f75:e97de149:0c512d92:67476c03 > ARRAY /dev/md3 level=raid1 num-devices=2 > UUID=a3dcd591:ad258de3:429e09ef:aee74491 > ARRAY /dev/md6 level=raid1 num-devices=2 > UUID=7ef1e8e1:d8d1efd9:bfe78010:bc810f04 > ARRAY /dev/md7 level=raid1 num-devices=2 > UUID=e496a7cf:f99735d8:4d63b4bd:567000c5 Have you double checked those UIDs against the arrays? My first guess would be that there is a mismatch for the problem arrays. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
degraded array at reboot
system is running Fedora 16 with RAID 1 upon a reboot some but not all of the partitions come up as degraded and its always the same partitions on the same disk (/dev/sda) /dev/md2, /dev/md6, and /dev/md7 (/usr, /boot, & /home respectively, /, /var, and swap mount with no issue) config files are: $ cat /etc/mdadm.conf # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda MAILADDR root AUTO +imsm +1.x -all ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=2 UUID=f7d27973:c1e3562c:c97c2b84:778f9f47 ARRAY /dev/md1 level=raid1 num-devices=2 UUID=e36e8193:d486ae1b:d9d2d364:ba744b1a ARRAY /dev/md2 level=raid1 num-devices=2 UUID=0bd93f75:e97de149:0c512d92:67476c03 ARRAY /dev/md3 level=raid1 num-devices=2 UUID=a3dcd591:ad258de3:429e09ef:aee74491 ARRAY /dev/md6 level=raid1 num-devices=2 UUID=7ef1e8e1:d8d1efd9:bfe78010:bc810f04 ARRAY /dev/md7 level=raid1 num-devices=2 UUID=e496a7cf:f99735d8:4d63b4bd:567000c5 $ sudo sfdisk -l /dev/sda Disk /dev/sda: 20023 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track Warning: extended partition does not start at a cylinder boundary. DOS and Linux will interpret the contents differently. Units = cylinders of 8225280 bytes, blocks of 1024 bytes, counting from 0 Device Boot Start End #cyls#blocks Id System /dev/sda1 0+ 1032- 1033- 8290304 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda2 1032+ 1988-957- 768 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda3 1988+ 2944-957- 768 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda4 2944+ 20023- 17079- 1371842565 Extended /dev/sda5 2944+ 3900-957- 768 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda6 * 3900+ 4002-102-819200 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda7 4002+ 20023- 16021- 128681984 fd Linux raid autodetect $ sudo sfdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 20023 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track Warning: extended partition does not start at a cylinder boundary. DOS and Linux will interpret the contents differently. Units = cylinders of 8225280 bytes, blocks of 1024 bytes, counting from 0 Device Boot Start End #cyls#blocks Id System /dev/sdb1 0+ 1032- 1033- 8290304 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sdb2 1032+ 1988-957- 768 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sdb3 1988+ 2944-957- 768 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sdb4 2944+ 20023- 17079- 1371842565 Extended /dev/sdb5 2944+ 3900-957- 768 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sdb6 * 3900+ 4002-102-819200 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sdb7 4002+ 20023- 16021- 128681984 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sd[ab]1 = /dev/md1 /dev/sd[ab]2 = /dev/md2 etc except /dev/sd[ab]5 = /dev/md0 In the past I've tried a simple add of the partition, other times I've tried --zero-superblock but each time after a reboot the problem comes back. suggestions? Thanks, Jeff -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Making a shared library executable outside the shell
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 10:05 +0100, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > I have built Chromium from source, and currently the only way to start > the browser is to execute the shared library file 'chrome' from shell. > > > I would like to be able to launch it from the normal menu like my > other applications, but I do not really know how to do this. Simply > creating a symlink in bin breaks dependencies (browser crashes due to > inability to load related libraries), and I am not really good enough > at shell-work to figure out what else could be done. It is further not > possible to launch the file from a normal file browser (system reports > that it has no application for handling shared libraries). > > > Any solution to this? > > > Thanks in advance! > > > Best, > > > Christopher I am not sure what "the only way to start the browser is to execute the shared library file 'chrome' from shell." means exactly but it seems to me that you could add an application to your upper panel (using ALT key) that would execute 'chrome' from wherever it is. -- === The public is an old woman. Let her maunder and mumble. -- Thomas Carlyle === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [389-users] 389 Segfault
On 02/23/2012 03:24 AM, Rafael Cervillera Cortés wrote: So I'm sorry. The platform is a CentOS 5.7 and the version of 389-ds-base is 1.2.9.9 release 1.el5. About the given URL, we can't use the utility of the debugging, because the crash can occurs once in two or three months, and is in our production server. Can you at least enable core files to be generated and saved? If this is the only information we have to go on, we will not be able to find the solution to this problem. Finally, 1.2.10.1 is in epel-testing - it should be more stable than 1.2.9.9 - 1.2.10.2 should be out today or tomorrow which is more stable. Thanks. El 22/02/2012 16:49, Rich Megginson escribió: On 02/22/2012 01:06 AM, Rafael Cervillera Cortés wrote: Hi. Yesterday, one of our 389 Directory Server crashed with the message: ldap kernel: ns-slapd[4300]: segfault at rip 2b91c2db3bab rsp 5302cca0 error 4 We haven't found any information about the 4300 code on Internet, and there isn't any illegal ldap operation in the access log file. Someone has any idea about this error code? No. Let's start with - what is your platform? rpm -qi 389-ds-base see also http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAQ#Debugging_Crashes Thanks. -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: Fedora 16 Stuck on Welcome Screen
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 05:28 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Oh, let me join the game: "systemd.unit=multi-user.taret". (the "multi-" as
> opposed to "mult-"...). Who's next? :-D
OK, why not? That's "systemd.unit=multi-user.target" ("target" as
opposed to "taret" :-)
The fact that so many typos are being made shows that this is pretty
clunky syntax.
--Greg
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [SOLVED ... kinda? :] Re: xsane problem - also hp-setup w/ hp7510
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 09:09 +1030, Tim wrote: > You could have a sample file for them to try out, or suggest a specific > file that they'd already have on their system. Some people have a > strange idea about what constitutes a *small* file. ;-) (It's only > 50MB, I deal with bigger files than that, all the time...) And it could > stop them from trying to test print from some broken document file. I've added a link to the QA Printing Test Cases. Tim. */ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [SOLVED ... kinda? :] Re: xsane problem - also hp-setup w/ hp7510
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 22:24 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > And, given that I > currently trying the hp-setup approach using material in the Fedora > repository (if that is the correct word), I am seeing that, as root, I > get nothing for lpinfo. And one of the suggestions in the document is to > run that to see what you get. The document doesn't address "what happens > if you can print but lpinfo/lpstat provide nothing. I've just updated that section. See what you think. Tim. */ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Making a shared library executable outside the shell
I have built Chromium from source, and currently the only way to start the browser is to execute the shared library file 'chrome' from shell. I would like to be able to launch it from the normal menu like my other applications, but I do not really know how to do this. Simply creating a symlink in bin breaks dependencies (browser crashes due to inability to load related libraries), and I am not really good enough at shell-work to figure out what else could be done. It is further not possible to launch the file from a normal file browser (system reports that it has no application for handling shared libraries). Any solution to this? Thanks in advance! Best, Christopher -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Nature article on Open Source as part of the publication process
Typo: subject should read "...scientific publication process". On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Christopher Svanefalk < christopher.svanef...@gmail.com> wrote: > I thought some of you would find the following article, which was > published in Nature recently, interesting: > > > http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v482/n7386/full/nature10836.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20120223 > > Best, > > Christopher > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Alchemist wrote: > > http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/02/adobe-and-google-partnering-for-flash-player-on-linux.html > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > Hopefully, the coming years will see an increasing shift to HTML5 technology over Flash and related, proprietary plugins. YouTube recently defaulted to WebM (as someone else pointed out), and in my experience it works just fine. The same should be possible for a majority of other interactive web features, it is simply a question of investment from the responsible companies, and these things of course are bound to take time. Even so, I think progress towards a genuinely open web experience is going alright. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Nature article on Open Source as part of the publication process
I thought some of you would find the following article, which was published in Nature recently, interesting: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v482/n7386/full/nature10836.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20120223 Best, Christopher -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 07:59, Heinz Diehl wrote: > For me as a student, this will force me to buy and use Windows > immediately, which I haven't used since Windows 3.1. It is absolutely > crucial for me to be able to view all websites, and a lot of them use flash. > The day this will no longer be possible on my linux machine, I _have_ > to use Windows (to quit at university is no option). Huh! No flash => quitting university? Really? I am also a university student, but I rarely have to visit any website for university business/research where I absolutely need flash. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
On 02/22/2012 11:16 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: I've been trying to "kick the Windows habit" for awhile and it gets better and better each year. But I know that there are just going to be situations where Windows is best (or only). And, to me, that's part of the landscape. I've been running strictly Linux since F9. The only time I'm at a computer running Windows is when I'm at my SF club playing a first-person shooter on one of the club's Windows boxes. Strictly speaking, my desktop is still dual boot, but I haven't booted into Win98SE in years, and don't expect to. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
