Re: Yumex problem
hello jim, "this tape will self destruct if yum quits" ;=) On 08/22/2013 05:23 PM, Jim wrote: fedora 18 / KDE I have problems starting Yumex, something about backend not running. Yum runs normal doing installs or updates i am not up on yum or yumex other than to say that _yumex_ is the _front_end_ to _yum_ the _back_end_. therefore, have you looked at /var/log/yum.log? when yumex gives problems > 15:21:08 : ERROR - ERROR: Fatal Error : backend-not-running > 15:21:08 : ERROR - ERROR: Backend not running as expected is telling you that _yum_ has stopped. not much to offer, but something to do because you do not mention if you have checked it. possibly something goes wrong when yum is run thru extender. hth until better help comes along. :=) much luck. -- peace out. in a world with out fences, who needs gates. sl6.3 linux tc.hago. g . -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F19 Kernels 3.10.5, 6, 7 won't boot [Solved]
On 08/22/2013 12:34 AM, Robert McBroom wrote: Updated to Fedora 19 but none of the kernels will boot. The process begins and something about an error with connecting to DBUS flashes on the screen then the cycle starts over. I can still run with kernel-3.10.4-100.fc18.x86_64 although it complains about a file missing that udev would like to see. [ 14.730648] systemd-udevd[1081]: failed to execute '/usr/lib/udev/socket:@/org/freedesktop/hal/udev_event' 'socket:@/org/freedesktop/hal/udev_event': No such file or directory Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz Working boot BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.10.4-100.fc18.x86_64 root=UUID=f04657c0-2964-494f-8efa-f194b7ba370a ro rd.md=0 rd.lvm=0 rd.dm=0 vconsole.keymap=us rd.luks=0 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 quiet pci=nomsi noapic irqpoll vconsole.font=latarcyrheb-sun16 3 nouveau.modeset=0 rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau video=vesa:off Looking at the /var/log messages see Some way in the upgrade process in grb2.cfg the kernel command line merged the upgrade parameters with the rest of the initialization. That then propagated to all later kernel installs. linux/vmlinuz-3.10.6-100.fc18.x86_64 root=UUID=f04657c0-2964-494f-8efa-f194b7ba370a ro rd.md=0 rd.lvm=0 rd.dm=0 vconsole.keymap=us rd.luks=0 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 quiet pci=nomsi noapic irqpoll vconsole.font=latarcyrheb-sun16 3 nouveau.modeset=0 rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau video=vesa:off upgrade systemd.unit=system-upgrade.target plymouth.splash=fedup enforcing=0 ===> linux/vmlinuz-3.10.6-100.fc18.x86_64 root=UUID=f04657c0-2964-494f-8efa-f194b7ba370a ro rd.md=0 rd.lvm=0 rd.dm=0 vconsole.keymap=us rd.luks=0 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 quiet pci=nomsi noapic irqpoll vconsole.font=latarcyrheb-sun16 3 nouveau.modeset=0 rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau video=vesa:off Edit of grub.cfg allows everything to function as it should. Robert McBroom -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gpg-agent
On Friday, August 23, 2013 01:00:35 AM Raman Gupta wrote: > On 08/23/2013 12:50 AM, Martin S wrote: > > I get this too, but one issue remains. > > Does the value GPGKEYS take 2 keys? I tried seperating the with " " and > > "," > > and both fails. As well as having two lines, but it only reads the first. > > According to README.Fedora, you can specify multiple keys, space > > separated: > > GPGKEYS defines a single key ID or a space separated list of key > > IDs. > > I would quote it e.g.: > > GPGKEYS="key1 key2" > > I've never tried multiple gpg keys though. I didn't get that to work ...Or at least it said it didn't load the keys =( Still, the setup is working, KMail is signing messages and I'm happy with that =) Thanks for the input. /M. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gpg-agent
On 08/23/2013 12:50 AM, Martin S wrote: > I get this too, but one issue remains. > Does the value GPGKEYS take 2 keys? I tried seperating the with " " and "," > and both fails. As well as having two lines, but it only reads the first. According to README.Fedora, you can specify multiple keys, space separated: > GPGKEYS defines a single key ID or a space separated list of key > IDs. I would quote it e.g.: GPGKEYS="key1 key2" I've never tried multiple gpg keys though. Regards, Raman -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gpg-agent
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 11:58:29 PM Raman Gupta wrote: > On 08/22/2013 11:48 PM, Martin S wrote: > > On Thursday, August 22, 2013 05:16:57 PM Raman Gupta wrote: > >> On 08/22/2013 04:18 PM, Martin S wrote: > >>> As I understand it the file gpg-agent-startup.sh should be placed in > >>> /etc/kde/env and made executable for the gpg-agent to start att boot > >>> time? > >>> Agent is also enabled in the ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf > >>> > >>> Running the file manually it starts the agent, but after having booted, > >>> the > >>> gpg-agent isn't started, so it seems the directory/file isn't read at > >>> boot > >>> time? > >>> > >>> Where should that file be place to be run at startup? > >>> > >>> /Martin S > >> > >> I would suggest use of "keychain". It will automatically load from > >> /etc/profile.d and will handle your gpg agent as well as other agents > >> like ssh. > > > > I installed keychain, created a file in profile.d which I tested manually > > (and it worked) and then rebooted. > > You shouldn't need to create anything in profile.d manually: > > # rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/profile.d/keychain.sh > keychain-2.6.8-11.fc19.noarch > > > Then > > [mskjoldebrand@dragon ~]$ ps aux | grep gpg-agent > > mskjold+ 1491 0.0 0.0 112644 928 pts/1S+ 05:41 0:00 grep -- > > color=auto gpg-agent > > > > Hmm gpg-agent isn't there ... still I tried creating a new signed message > > from KMail, and it actually works. > > > > Shouldn't gpg-agent show up in ps aux | grep gpg-agent if it's run from > > profile.d? > > Did you create a .keychainrc file with your gpg key ID as specified here: > > /usr/share/doc/keychain-2.6.8/README.Fedora > > After you do that, and login again, what happens when you type > "keychain" at the prompt? This is what I see: > > $ keychain > > KeyChain 2.6.8; http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/keychain/ > Copyright 2002-2004 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL > > * Found existing ssh-agent (4386) > * Found existing gpg-agent (4651) I get this too, but one issue remains. Does the value GPGKEYS take 2 keys? I tried seperating the with " " and "," and both fails. As well as having two lines, but it only reads the first. /M . -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gpg-agent
On 08/22/2013 11:48 PM, Martin S wrote: > On Thursday, August 22, 2013 05:16:57 PM Raman Gupta wrote: >> On 08/22/2013 04:18 PM, Martin S wrote: >>> As I understand it the file gpg-agent-startup.sh should be placed in >>> /etc/kde/env and made executable for the gpg-agent to start att boot time? >>> Agent is also enabled in the ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf >>> >>> Running the file manually it starts the agent, but after having booted, >>> the >>> gpg-agent isn't started, so it seems the directory/file isn't read at boot >>> time? >>> >>> Where should that file be place to be run at startup? >>> >>> /Martin S >> >> I would suggest use of "keychain". It will automatically load from >> /etc/profile.d and will handle your gpg agent as well as other agents >> like ssh. > > I installed keychain, created a file in profile.d which I tested manually > (and > it worked) and then rebooted. You shouldn't need to create anything in profile.d manually: # rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/profile.d/keychain.sh keychain-2.6.8-11.fc19.noarch > Then > [mskjoldebrand@dragon ~]$ ps aux | grep gpg-agent > mskjold+ 1491 0.0 0.0 112644 928 pts/1S+ 05:41 0:00 grep -- > color=auto gpg-agent > > Hmm gpg-agent isn't there ... still I tried creating a new signed message > from > KMail, and it actually works. > > Shouldn't gpg-agent show up in ps aux | grep gpg-agent if it's run from > profile.d? Did you create a .keychainrc file with your gpg key ID as specified here: /usr/share/doc/keychain-2.6.8/README.Fedora After you do that, and login again, what happens when you type "keychain" at the prompt? This is what I see: $ keychain KeyChain 2.6.8; http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/keychain/ Copyright 2002-2004 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL * Found existing ssh-agent (4386) * Found existing gpg-agent (4651) and those pid's match my running ssh and gpg agents (which were started by keychain at login time). > Or have I worked from outdated gpg-docs, and KMail finds gpg anyway (it > didn't > before) and wasted everyuones time? =( Not sure about this, I don't use kmail. Regards, Raman -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gpg-agent
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 05:16:57 PM Raman Gupta wrote: > On 08/22/2013 04:18 PM, Martin S wrote: > > As I understand it the file gpg-agent-startup.sh should be placed in > > /etc/kde/env and made executable for the gpg-agent to start att boot time? > > Agent is also enabled in the ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf > > > > Running the file manually it starts the agent, but after having booted, > > the > > gpg-agent isn't started, so it seems the directory/file isn't read at boot > > time? > > > > Where should that file be place to be run at startup? > > > > /Martin S > > I would suggest use of "keychain". It will automatically load from > /etc/profile.d and will handle your gpg agent as well as other agents > like ssh. I installed keychain, created a file in profile.d which I tested manually (and it worked) and then rebooted. Then [mskjoldebrand@dragon ~]$ ps aux | grep gpg-agent mskjold+ 1491 0.0 0.0 112644 928 pts/1S+ 05:41 0:00 grep -- color=auto gpg-agent Hmm gpg-agent isn't there ... still I tried creating a new signed message from KMail, and it actually works. Shouldn't gpg-agent show up in ps aux | grep gpg-agent if it's run from profile.d? Or have I worked from outdated gpg-docs, and KMail finds gpg anyway (it didn't before) and wasted everyuones time? =( /Martin S -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gpg-agent
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 01:55:26 PM Joe Zeff wrote: > On 08/22/2013 01:18 PM, Martin S wrote: > > Where should that file be place to be run at startup? > > My guess (and it's only that) is that you should create > gpg-agent.service and enable it. Either that, or invoke the script from > /etc/rc.local, after making sure that rc.local.service is enabled. Of > course, ICBW. OK, tried both. There is no gpg-agent.service, so I tried enabling rc.local instead. And got the following. [root@dragon mskjoldebrand]# systemctl enable rc-local.service The unit files have no [Install] section. They are not meant to be enabled using systemctl. Possible reasons for having this kind of units are: 1) A unit may be statically enabled by being symlinked from another unit's .wants/ or .requires/ directory. 2) A unit's purpose may be to act as a helper for some other unit which has a requirement dependency on it. 3) A unit may be started when needed via activation (socket, path, timer, D-Bus, udev, scripted systemctl call, ...). /Martin S -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Yumex problem
fedora 18 / KDE I have problems starting Yumex, something about backend not running. Yum runs normal doing installs or updates $ yumex -d 15:20:52 : INFO - Using config file : /home/jim/.config/yumex/yumex.conf 15:20:52 : INFO - Using config file : /home/jim/.config/yumex/yumex.conf 15:20:52 : DEBUG - Current Yumex Settings: 15:20:52 : DEBUG - autorefresh: True 15:20:52 : DEBUG - branding_title: 'Yum Extender' 15:20:52 : DEBUG - bugzilla_url: 'https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=' 15:20:52 : DEBUG - color_downgrade: 'goldenrod' 15:20:52 : DEBUG - color_install: 'darkgreen' 15:20:52 : DEBUG - color_normal: 'black' 15:20:52 : DEBUG - color_obsolete: 'blue' 15:20:52 : DEBUG - color_update: 'red' 15:20:52 : DEBUG - debug: True 15:20:52 : DEBUG - disable_netcheck: False 15:20:52 : DEBUG - disable_repo_page: False 15:20:52 : DEBUG - history_limit: 15 15:20:52 : DEBUG - no_gpg_check: False 15:20:52 : DEBUG - plugins: True 15:20:52 : DEBUG - proxy: '' 15:20:52 : DEBUG - recentdays: 14 15:20:52 : DEBUG - remove_requirements: False 15:20:52 : DEBUG - repo_exclude: ['debug', 'source'] 15:20:52 : DEBUG - show_newest_only: True 15:20:52 : DEBUG - skip_broken: False 15:20:52 : DEBUG - typeahead_search: False 15:20:52 : DEBUG - use_sortable_view: False 15:20:52 : DEBUG - use_sudo: False 15:20:52 : DEBUG - win_height: 494 15:20:52 : DEBUG - win_sep: 300 15:20:52 : DEBUG - win_width: 1000 15:20:52 : DEBUG - yum_conf: '/etc/yum.conf' 15:20:52 : DEBUG - yumdebuglevel: 2 15:20:53 : DEBUG - network interface wlan0 (rtl8188eu) is connected 15:20:53 : DEBUG - network interface wlan0 (rtl8188eu) is connected 15:20:54 : INFO - Connected to an network 15:20:54 : DEBUG - Getting package lists - BEGIN 15:20:54 : DEBUG - network interface wlan0 (rtl8188eu) is connected 15:20:54 : INFO - Starting yum child process 15:20:54 : DEBUG - Initialize yum backend - BEGIN 15:20:54 : DEBUG - Setup START 15:21:08 : ERROR - ERROR: Fatal Error : backend-not-running 15:21:08 : ERROR - ERROR: Backend not running as expected Yum Extender will terminate --> exit code : None 15:21:08 : DEBUG - Quiting the program !!! 15:21:08 : INFO - yum backend process is ended 15:21:08 : DEBUG - Backend reset completed 15:21:08 : DEBUG - Quiting the program !!! 15:21:08 : INFO - yum backend process is ended 15:21:08 : DEBUG - Backend reset completed Program Terminated [jim@localhost ~]$ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gpg-agent
On 08/22/2013 04:18 PM, Martin S wrote: > As I understand it the file gpg-agent-startup.sh should be placed in > /etc/kde/env and made executable for the gpg-agent to start att boot time? > Agent is also enabled in the ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf > > Running the file manually it starts the agent, but after having booted, the > gpg-agent isn't started, so it seems the directory/file isn't read at boot > time? > > Where should that file be place to be run at startup? > > /Martin S I would suggest use of "keychain". It will automatically load from /etc/profile.d and will handle your gpg agent as well as other agents like ssh. Regards, Raman -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gpg-agent
On 08/22/2013 01:18 PM, Martin S wrote: Where should that file be place to be run at startup? My guess (and it's only that) is that you should create gpg-agent.service and enable it. Either that, or invoke the script from /etc/rc.local, after making sure that rc.local.service is enabled. Of course, ICBW. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [389-users] Problems setting up MMR
Modify an entry on the (a) master and see if the change propagates. The master will also complain vociferously in the error log if it can't send updates to a consumer. -morgan On Aug 22, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Louis Bohm wrote: > I added it with an ldapadd on host ldap02 and was able to initialize the > consumer. > > So now that I have it working how do I test it and validate it? > > Louis > On Aug 22, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Morgan Jones wrote: > >> Louis, >> >> Did you create cn=replication manager? It looks like you did not. >> >> Try this to see if it's there: >> ldapsearch -H ldaps://ldap02 -D cn=directory\ manager -w pass -LLLb >> "cn=replication manager,cn=config" objectclass=\* >> >> replace ldaps with ldap of course if you have not set up ssl. >> >> I believe it's in dse.ldif as well. >> >> -morgan >> >> >> On Aug 22, 2013, at 3:17 PM, Louis Bohm wrote: >> >>> I have 2 servers running cents 6.4 and the newest version of DS from the >>> repos. Both serves have the same supplier DN. On the second server >>> (ldap02) I go no errors when setting up the replication agreement. >>> However, on the first server (ldap01) I got "LDAP error: No such object. >>> Error code: 32". The logs on ldap02 show this: >>> >>> [22/Aug/2013:15:14:17 -0400] conn=48 fd=71 slot=71 connection from >>> 10.74.192.51 to 10.74.192.52 >>> [22/Aug/2013:15:14:17 -0400] conn=48 op=0 BIND dn="cn=replication >>> manager,cn=config" method=128 version=3 >>> [22/Aug/2013:15:14:17 -0400] conn=48 op=0 RESULT err=32 tag=97 nentries=0 >>> etime=0 >>> [22/Aug/2013:15:14:17 -0400] conn=48 op=1 UNBIND >>> [22/Aug/2013:15:14:17 -0400] conn=48 op=1 fd=71 closed - U1 >>> >>> I guess the first thing I need to do is prove that supplier DN is really >>> there and is the same. But I have been unable to come up with an >>> ldapsearch that shows it. Or is the only way to see it is to grep the >>> dse.ldif file? >>> >>> Louis >>> >>> -- >>> 389 users mailing list >>> 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users >> >> -- >> 389 users mailing list >> 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
gpg-agent
As I understand it the file gpg-agent-startup.sh should be placed in /etc/kde/env and made executable for the gpg-agent to start att boot time? Agent is also enabled in the ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf Running the file manually it starts the agent, but after having booted, the gpg-agent isn't started, so it seems the directory/file isn't read at boot time? Where should that file be place to be run at startup? /Martin S -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Google Calendar client for Fedora
On 08/22/2013 06:49 AM, Paul Smith wrote: > Dear All, > > Is there some > > Google Calendar client > > for Fedora? > > Thanks in advance, > > Paul > KOrganizer with libgcal (via Akonadi) also works well, although there are a couple of minor timezone/daylight savings issues. Install libgcal, and in KOrganizer, go to Configure, General, Calendars, Add... and select "Google Calendars and Tasks". Regards, Raman -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Google Calendar client for Fedora
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:49 +0100, Paul Smith wrote: > Dear All, > > Is there some > > Google Calendar client > > for Fedora? Evolution works fine as far as I know. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Google Calendar client for Fedora
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > Is there some Google Calendar client for Fedora? > > https://wiki.mozilla.org/Calendar:Using_Lightning_with_Google_Calendars Thanks, Mihamina, lightning is a nice Thunderbird extension, which synchronizes with Google Calendar. Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Google Calendar client for Fedora
On 2013-08-22 13:49, Paul Smith wrote: Dear All, Is there some Google Calendar client for Fedora? https://wiki.mozilla.org/Calendar:Using_Lightning_with_Google_Calendars -- RMA. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Google Calendar client for Fedora
Dear All, Is there some Google Calendar client for Fedora? Thanks in advance, Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: non luks encryption, other minds?
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:20:10 +0100 Forgot to add I have an 80gb sata as swap drive. -- Regards, Frank "When in doubt PANIC!" I check for new mail app. 20min www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
non luks encryption, other minds?
Could some one good at crypt look at the link, lmk thoughts re fedora 19. Have the following in /etc/crypttab: # swap UUID=4ea253d9-e5d2-4d7c-b40c-22c44b2affc6 /dev/urandom swap,cipher=aes-cbc-essiv:sha256,size=256 But during bootup am asked for password for "swap" So Googled: http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/64693/how-do-i-configure-systemd-to-activate-an-encrypted-swap-file -- Regards, Frank "When in doubt PANIC!" I check for new mail app. 20min www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F19 Kernels 3.10.5, 6, 7 won't boot
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:34:59 -0400 Robert McBroom wrote: > # systemctl status dbus-org.freedesktop.nm-dispatcher.service > > dbus-org.freedesktop.nm-dispatcher.service > Loaded: error (Reason: No such file or directory) > Active: inactive (dead) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974811 -- Regards, Frank "When in doubt PANIC!" I check for new mail app. 20min www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F19 Kernels 3.10.5, 6, 7 won't boot
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:34:59AM -0400, Robert McBroom wrote: > Updated to Fedora 19 but none of the kernels will boot. The > process begins and something about an error with connecting > to DBUS flashes on the screen then the cycle starts over. > I can still run with kernel-3.10.4-100.fc18.x86_64 although > it complains about a file missing that udev would like to see. > > [ 14.730648] systemd-udevd[1081]: failed to execute > '/usr/lib/udev/socket:@/org/freedesktop/hal/udev_event' > 'socket:@/org/freedesktop/hal/udev_event': No such file or directory > > Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz > > Working boot > > BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.10.4-100.fc18.x86_64 > root=UUID=f04657c0-2964-494f-8efa-f194b7ba370a ro rd.md=0 rd.lvm=0 rd.dm=0 > vconsole.keymap=us rd.luks=0 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 quiet pci=nomsi noapic irqpoll > vconsole.font=latarcyrheb-sun16 3 nouveau.modeset=0 > rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau video=vesa:off > > Looking at the /var/log messages see > > Aug 18 00:31:57 robert-pc dbus[1066]: [system] Activating via systemd: > service name='org.freedesktop.nm_dispatcher' > unit='dbus-org.freedesktop.nm-dispatcher.service' > Aug 18 00:31:57 robert-pc dbus[1066]: [system] Activation via systemd failed > for unit 'dbus-org.freedesktop.nm-dispatcher.service': Unit > dbus-org.freedesktop.nm-dispatcher.service failed to load: No such file or > directory. See system logs and 'systemctl status > dbus-org.freedesktop.nm-dispatcher.service' for details. > Aug 18 00:31:57 robert-pc NetworkManager[1044]: Dispatcher failed: > (32) Unit dbus-org.freedesktop.nm-dispatcher.service failed to load: No such > file or directory. See system logs and 'systemctl status > dbus-org.freedesktop.nm-dispatcher.service' for details. > Aug 18 00:31:57 robert-pc dbus-daemon[1066]: dbus[1066]: [system] Activating > via systemd: service name='org.freedesktop.nm_dispatcher' > unit='dbus-org.freedesktop.nm-dispatcher.service' > Aug 18 00:31:57 robert-pc dbus-daemon[1066]: dbus[1066]: [system] Activation > via systemd failed for unit 'dbus-org.freedesktop.nm-dispatcher.service': > Unit dbus-org.freedesktop.nm-dispatcher.service failed to load: No such file > or directory. See system logs and 'systemctl status > dbus-org.freedesktop.nm-dispatcher.service' for details. > > # systemctl status dbus-org.freedesktop.nm-dispatcher.service > > dbus-org.freedesktop.nm-dispatcher.service > Loaded: error (Reason: No such file or directory) > Active: inactive (dead) > > Any ideas as to what is happening? No idea, but I also see that: ** the icon of the power manager is missing; ** when is returning from sleep it goes back to sleep right away. Only the second time stays awake; ** when this happens, after the second wakeup the ath9k module issues continuously for a couple dozen of seconds or so: kernel: [121459.809116] ath: phy0: PLL4 meaurement not done 3.10.[56] had no apparent shortcoming, though. Mihai -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
