Re: ssh "GSSAPIAuthentication yes"

[Timothy Murphy]

inode0 wrote:

>> I see that in /etc/ssh/ssh_config I have the above setting
>> in both Fedora-19 and CentOS-6.4 .
>> In both cases ssh (openssh) tries and fails to use gssapi-with-mic
>> authentication, with the message
>> ===
>> Unspecified GSS failure.  Minor code may provide more information
>> No Kerberos credentials available
>> ===
>> It then goes on to use publickey authentication, successfully.
> 
> Do you have a keytab installed on the machine you are trying to login to?

I don't.
I didn't know about keytabs, and am reading 

to learn something about them.

At the moment I'm not clear what advantage keytabs have.
I do not have to login after "ssh -Y ..."
as I have appended id_rsa.pub to known_hosts in each direction.

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: rsync errors (selinux?)

[Wolfgang S. Rupprecht]

ok, I think I see what happened. 

[root@arbol wolfgang]# ll -Z 
/home/wolfgang/.config/google-chrome-unstable/Default/Extensions/_hidden_/0.0.5.0_0/_locales/lt/messages.json
-rw-rw-r-- wolfgang wolfgang ?
/home/wolfgang/.config/google-chrome-unstable/Default/Extensions/_hidden_/0.0.5.0_0/_locales/lt/messages.json

The contexts on the source machine are messed up.  I recall when I did a
"yum distro-sync" that I got an error message between the rpm's for
selinux-policy and selinux-policy-targeted about the policy file build
failing.  I yum erased both rpms (not knowing which caused the error
msg) and re-installed them both.  I didn't get an error that second time
so I figured all went well.  Subsequent "restorecon -rv /home" completed
without error, so I figured all was well.

Off to google as to how to rebuild the policy file...

-wolfgang
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: rsync errors (selinux?)

[Wolfgang S. Rupprecht]

Daniel J Walsh  writes:
> service auditd status

[wolfgang@arbol ~]$ service auditd status
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl status  auditd.service
auditd.service - Security Auditing Service
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/auditd.service; enabled)
   Active: active (running) since Mon 2013-11-25 03:54:01 PST; 12h ago
 Main PID: 308 (auditd)
   CGroup: /system.slice/auditd.service
   ├─308 /sbin/auditd -n
   ├─313 /sbin/audispd
   └─315 /usr/sbin/sedispatch

Nov 25 03:54:01 arbol.wsrcc.com systemd[1]: Starting Security Auditing Servi
Nov 25 03:54:01 arbol.wsrcc.com auditd[308]: Started dispatcher: /sbin/audis...3
Nov 25 03:54:01 arbol.wsrcc.com audispd[313]: priority_boost_parser called w...4
Nov 25 03:54:01 arbol.wsrcc.com audispd[313]: max_restarts_parser called wit...0
Nov 25 03:54:01 arbol.wsrcc.com audispd[313]: audispd initialized with q_dep...s
Nov 25 03:54:01 arbol.wsrcc.com systemd[1]: Started Security Auditing Service.
Nov 25 03:54:01 arbol.wsrcc.com auditd[308]: Init complete, auditd 2.3.2 lis...)
Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full.
[wolfgang@arbol ~]$ 

I'm beginning to think that this is an internal rsync problem where it
can't set the destination file contexts.

-wolfgang
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

[389-users] Upgrade failure

[Gordon Messmer]

On Friday, I updated one of several systems that I manage from version 
1.2.11.15 to version 1.2.11.25.  Thereafter, the service was unable to 
start.  The error indicates a problem with SSL that I don't understand. 
 I've included the relevant section from the "error" log below.


After reverting to the old package, the service starts again.

Does anyone understand this error and have a pointer on resolving it?



yum.log:
Sep 20 15:35:43 Updated: 389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.15-22.el6_4.x86_64
Sep 20 15:36:24 Updated: 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-22.el6_4.x86_64
Nov 22 15:03:40 Updated: 389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.25-1.el6.x86_64
Nov 22 15:05:17 Updated: 389-ds-base-1.2.11.25-1.el6.x86_64


error:
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:08 -0800] - check_and_set_import_cache: pagesize: 
4096, pages: 980670, procpages: 52580

[22/Nov/2013:15:05:08 -0800] - Import allocates 1569072KB import cache.
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:08 -0800] Upgrade DN Format - userRoot: Start upgrade 
dn format.
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:08 -0800] Upgrade DN Format - Instance userRoot in 
/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-master1/db/userRoot is up-to-date
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:14 -0800] - 389-Directory/1.2.11.25 B2013.325.1951 
starting up
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:15 -0800] slapd_get_unlocked_key_for_cert - Error: 
could not find any unlocked slots for certificate 
[E=postmas...@xxx.com,CN=mail.xxx.com,O=xxx,
L=Seattle,ST=Washington,C=US,OID.2.5.4.13=5t6jP8FugTLuYrW8].  Please 
review your TLS/SSL configuration.  The following slots were found:
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:15 -0800] slapd_get_unlocked_key_for_cert - Slot [NSS 
User Private Key and Certificate Services] token [Internal (Software) 
Token] was locked.
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:15 -0800] - Can't get private key from cert 
Server-Cert in attrcrypt_fetch_private_key: -8049 - Unrecognized Object 
IDentifier.
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:15 -0800] - Error: unable to initialize attrcrypt 
system for userRoot
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - start: Failed to start databases, err=-1 
Unknown error: -1

[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Failed to start database plugin ldbm database
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - WARNING: ldbm instance userRoot already 
exists
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - ldbm_config_read_instance_entries: failed 
to add instance entry cn=userRoot,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - ldbm_config_load_dse_info: failed to read 
instance entries

[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - start: Loading database configuration failed
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Failed to start database plugin ldbm database
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: Failed to resolve plugin dependencies
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: preoperation plugin 7-bit check is 
not started
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: preoperation plugin Account 
Usability Plugin is not started
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: accesscontrol plugin ACL Plugin is 
not started
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: preoperation plugin ACL 
preoperation is not started
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: preoperation plugin Auto 
Membership Plugin is not started
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: object plugin Class of Service is 
not started
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: preoperation plugin deref is not 
started
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: preoperation plugin HTTP Client is 
not started
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: database plugin ldbm database is 
not started
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: object plugin Legacy Replication 
Plugin is not started
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: preoperation plugin Linked 
Attributes is not started
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: preoperation plugin Managed 
Entries is not started
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: object plugin Multimaster 
Replication Plugin is not started
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: preoperation plugin Pass Through 
Authentication is not started
[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: object plugin Roles Plugin is not 
started

[22/Nov/2013:15:05:16 -0800] - Error: object plugin Views is not started
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: Display setting problem -

[poma]

On 25.11.2013 22:23, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:

> Then when I select the "Display" GUI it offers me 1680x1050 sure enough but 
> does not actually select it.
> 
> I still have to run my script to get other than 1024x768.
> 
> It doesn't seem to pay attention to lightdm.conf?
> 

"--output" selects a particular output mode, so it should work.
Move a 'monitors.xml' so it doesn't interfere with setup,
$ mv $HOME/.config/monitors.xml $HOME/.config/monitors.xml-backup
and disable that session script of yours.
Check what's happening via '/var/log/lightdm/lightdm.log'

> So I can't even mention it when I am testing to see if I can move one 
> message between F-19 and it and maintain the threading? Which it did 
> incidentally!

You are probably the oldest dude here and intelligent, so please prefer
to be a positive example for all of us.


poma

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can't stand Gnome3, I think it's time for Fedora to move on

[Bill Davidsen]

Rahul Sundaram wrote:




On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:

FWIW, I'm absolutely in love with Gnome3. Best thing ever happened to UI.

That said, it would be nice indeed if users had a choice during
installation, something simple like 3 screenshots to choose from.


There are around a dozen choices here -  GNOME (Shell and Classic), KDE, Xfce,
MATE,  LXDE,  Sugar,  GNU Step, Cinnamon, Enlightenment (both 17 and 16) and so
on.  It is hardly going to be simple to present 3 screenshots.   The DVD image
does have a few of them but it really is a waste of space to include all of
them.  Just install it from the repository or download the specific spin you 
want

Perhaps this has been stated badly, the issue is that if a user doesn't know 
about the other options, or has small hardware, he can't "Just install" at all. 
If there were just a screen to offer any one of the light weight UI choices and 
warn that GNOME is not optimal for the hardware, that would do it. Only a few k 
of screen code, don't need more UI options that are present now, but even the 
two or three now present would be fine with thumbnails. Just default to 
something which will work on the system being installed, I'm certainly not 
asking for more than that. I admit that if MATE was ready for serious use when I 
went to XFCE I would have used that, but it's hardly work changing at this 
point, for my usage practices.


Sorry if it sounded as if we ere asking for more than warning the user if GNOME 
won't work.


--
Bill Davidsen 
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can't stand Gnome3, I think it's time for Fedora to move on

[Bill Davidsen]

Rahul Sundaram wrote:

HI


On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:


That's especially true if you consider that many people are installing Linux
on older computers, especially laptops, so as to get some more use out of
computers that aren't up to running the latest versions of Windows.  If they
don't know about the various DEs and/or spins, they may just look at the
requirements for Fedora with Gnome, see that they don't have the hardware to
run it properly and give up.


The requirements for the installer is more than any desktop environment in
Fedora making Fedora not really a good choice for lower end systems anyway.


Other than GNOME not running well on low end video, I haven't seen any issues 
with the installer through FC18, anyway. The upgrade process seems troubled (see 
my other thread) but the install has been good to me, all the way down to a 
laptop running a Pentium-M setup (which I love for its 17in screen and perfect 
touch on the keyboard). I have four ATOM system, none of which cost more than 
$300 to buy or build, and they work fine on 18, will try 19 one of these days. 
Not for gaming, and probably heavy graphics, rendering, etc, but for mail and 
browsing normal websites I have no issues. One handles two security cameras and 
a 8TB RAID array for backups, another is a firewall, etc.


Caution noted, I'm aware that there are limitations, but a lot of us have modest 
graphics needs and if XFCE will install, that's all we need.


--
Bill Davidsen 
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can't stand Gnome3, I think it's time for Fedora to move on

[Bill Davidsen]

Joe Zeff wrote:

On 11/22/2013 04:29 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:



This is a VERY good point which I had overlooked, the hardware
requirements of GNOME are much higher that XFCE (and I believe MATE) and
represent choice which is very likely to frustrate potential converts.


That's especially true if you consider that many people are installing Linux on
older computers, especially laptops, so as to get some more use out of computers
that aren't up to running the latest versions of Windows.  If they don't know
about the various DEs and/or spins, they may just look at the requirements for
Fedora with Gnome, see that they don't have the hardware to run it properly and
give up.

Maybe what we need is a "beginner's spin" that gives you a choice of DE, but
grays out any choices that your system can't handle.  It would probably have to
be based on the full DVD installation, but with a specially modified version of
Anaconda that checks your CPU, RAM, video and so on, to make sure that it offers
you the correct choices.


That is a brilliant idea, but why a beginners spin? Why shouldn't a major choice 
like UI deserve a screen at startup. And values which are unlikely to work could 
be identified so the installer is warned, giving some hope that at least one 
functional choice will be made. In my opinion every install should add one more 
choice to the boot menu, "boot in VESA (simple) graphics mode." That way people 
who who have video cards which aren't supported by the open source video drivers 
can have a way to use their computers.


Hopefully some features council will actually pick up these ideas and we can see 
them in FC20 or FC21.


--
Bill Davidsen 
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Better way to upgrade fc18->fc19

[Bill Davidsen]

Suvayu Ali wrote:

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 07:05:17PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:


Is there a better way than fedup, and why is it so slow?


The last few upgrades, I went by the yum method.  Despite all the
warnings on the wiki, this seems to be the smoothest of all upgrade
methods I have tried since F10.

Hope this helps,

Appreciated! Having just wasted a lot of time with fedup, it may, I'll go check 
the wiki in the morning. On the first try I started with about 2G free, and got 
this:


18-fedup-64:root> time fedup --iso /mnt/10space/Downloads/ISO/Fedora/Fedora-
19/Fedora-19-x86_64-DVD/Fedora-19-x86_64-DVD.iso
setting up repos...
getting boot images...
setting up update...
finding updates 100% 
[=]

testing upgrade transaction
rpm transaction 100% 
[=]


Upgrade test failed with the following problems:
insufficient disk space
  need 395M free on / (447M free)
fedup ERROR: Upgrade test failed.
rpm transaction 100% 
[=]


real1m35.615s
user0m17.963s
sys 0m3.339s
18-fedup-64:root>

Which wasn't obvious, since the error message appears to say I have more than I 
need.


So I cleared more space and tried again, which ran to completion and told me to 
reboot. There was about a GB of stuff in the /var/tmp/fedora-upgrade tree, which 
was encouraging. I did the reboot, and the default boot option was Fedora 
upgrade, which started, put up a screen with a crawling white line, and when 
done booted back into Fedora18. Checking /boot there are no Fedora19 images, and 
/var/tmp/fedora-upgrade is now empty of all the stuff it had there before the 
reboot. Nothing is changed as far as I can see. I got this behavior with both a 
network upgrade and upgrade from an iso image with no visible network activity.



I'm very ready to try the yum method, since fedup is no more functional for me 
than ever, less actually, since it did eventually complete the last time I 
updated these machines.


--
Bill Davidsen 
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Writing English. Please explain how this is a Fedora topic? -No please don't!

[Beartooth]

On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 12:20:50 +, Ian Malone wrote:

> [] The moderators can tell us
> to drop it, but if you want to ask them to ask then better to email the
> admin address rather than the whole list. To be honest though you could
> just ignore it. There are lots of threads I don't read on here because
> they're not relevant to me either.

For this list (thanks be!) and many another, there is an 
excellent alternative. Point your newsreader, not your mailer (I 
recommend Pan, available via yum, as newsreader) at news.gmane.org, port 
119. To be able to post, it suffices to subscribe and at once set your 
subscription to nomail.

-- 
Beartooth Staffwright, Neo-Redneck Not Quite Clueless Power User
Remember I have precious (very precious!) little idea where up is.


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Display setting problem -

[Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA]

On 25/11/13 12:29, poma wrote:

On 25.11.2013 17:27, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:


Ok, then I assume that to mean there is no better way.


Please this time try to read carefully from top to bottom.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/425665




Ok, so I have done the following [I think]:



Automation in da display manager style:
/etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf:
display-setup-script=/usr/bin/RandR
…

/usr/bin/RandR:
#!/bin/sh
# ViewSonic VX2035wm
xrandr --newmode "1680x1050R" 119.00 1680 1728 1760 1840 1050 1053 1059
1080 +hsync -vsync >/dev/null 2>&1
xrandr --addmode VGA-0 1680x1050R >/dev/null 2>&1
xrandr --output VGA-0 --mode 1680x1050R >/dev/null 2>&1
exit 0


Cheers,
poma



Then when I select the "Display" GUI it offers me 1680x1050 sure enough but 
does not actually select it.

I still have to run my script to get other than 1024x768.

It doesn't seem to pay attention to lightdm.conf?





This message is an interesting experiment in that I have copied your
response between Thunderbird in this F-19 computer to Thunderbird in the
VMware F-20 beta virtual machine. Hopefully it will still thread properly?


U2 should know better after years of use.
F20 ain't an official, so
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
So I can't even mention it when I am testing to see if I can move one 
message between F-19 and it and maintain the threading? Which it did 
incidentally!


Bob


poma





--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
Box 10 Fedora-19/64 XFCE Linux

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: rsync errors (selinux?)

[Daniel J Walsh]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11/25/2013 02:54 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> 
> Daniel J Walsh  writes:
>> ausearch -m avc -ts recent
> 
> local host (source of rsync):
> 
> [root@arbol audit]# ausearch -m avc -ts recent  [root@arbol
> audit]#
> 
> remote host (destination or rsync):
> 
> [root@capsicum audit]# ausearch -m avc -ts recent  
> [root@capsicum audit]#
> 
> also a tail -f on /var/log/audit/audit.log on both machines while the 
> errors were spewing on the screen showed no corresponding errors (or other
> output for that matter) in audit.log.
> 
> -wolfgang
> 
Do you have the audit daemon running?

service auditd status

If you run setenforce 0 to the errors stop?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlKTvkwACgkQrlYvE4MpobOpMACeIpHZzap/wFpM7aGnpdh+/bpm
pK0An2faK6ZZZUtMkywFBn2TMzK+ojk0
=vJN/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Default browser

[Joe Zeff]

On 11/25/2013 12:50 PM, Beartooth wrote:

I've managed to make it a partial default (under xfce4 in F18).
Pan, for instance, routinely opens links in Dillo. Alpine, however, does
not. (I run Alpine on a remote host, over ssh; is that relevant? It does
open Firefox.)



The default browser *on the computer running the program* is the one 
that gets opened.  Unless you can change the default on the remote host, 
Alpine's behavior won't change.



Like so many other things of late, the software to set default
choices seems to have been moved to some new place, without leaving a
spoor behind to follow. So the place I found to set defaults is quite
likely not the main one. What is??


That depends on the DE.  In Xfce4, it should be under 
Settings->Preferred Applications.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Default browser

[Beartooth]

In the past, I have always set my default browser to Dillo, which 
is very fast and very safe; and it usually shows me at least enough to 
guess reasonably well whether I want to go on, switch to another browser, 
or skip the site. 

I've managed to make it a partial default (under xfce4 in F18). 
Pan, for instance, routinely opens links in Dillo. Alpine, however, does 
not. (I run Alpine on a remote host, over ssh; is that relevant? It does 
open Firefox.)

Like so many other things of late, the software to set default 
choices seems to have been moved to some new place, without leaving a 
spoor behind to follow. So the place I found to set defaults is quite 
likely not the main one. What is??
-- 
Beartooth Staffwright, Neo-Redneck Not Quite Clueless Power User
Remember I have precious (very precious!) little idea where up is.


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: rsync errors (selinux?)

[Wolfgang S. Rupprecht]

Daniel J Walsh  writes:
> ausearch -m avc -ts recent

local host (source of rsync):

[root@arbol audit]# ausearch -m avc -ts recent

[root@arbol audit]# 

remote host (destination or rsync):

[root@capsicum audit]# ausearch -m avc -ts recent

[root@capsicum audit]# 

also a tail -f on /var/log/audit/audit.log on both machines while the
errors were spewing on the screen showed no corresponding errors (or
other output for that matter) in audit.log.

-wolfgang

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: installin handbrake in Fedora 18 ?

[poma]

On 25.11.2013 19:05, Jim wrote:
> Where can I get the RPMS for handbrake-gui and  handbrake-cli ?
> 

Are you ready for your build?


poma


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Terminal signal handling

[Ahmad Samir]

On 24 November 2013 19:32, Peter Oliver
 wrote:
> I've started having a couple of odd issues with terminals in the last week
> or so on my Fedora 19 desktop machine and I think they're probably related.
> My laptop, also running Fedora 19, appears to be unaffected.
>
>
> Sometimes, terminals are unresponsive to ^Z, and I'm unable to suspend a
> process by using 'kill -TSTP' on that process.  However, 'kill -STOP' works.
> Running 'stty -a' shows 'susp = ^Z' as expected.
>
> This affects both xterm and gnome-terminal.  It affects all children of an
> affected process.  However, sometimes if I start a new terminal from Gnome
> Shell it will not be affected.
>
> A workaround is to run "exec ksh -c 'exec $SHELL'" from an affected
> terminal.  It appears that ksh does some initialisation that bash, dash and
> tcsh do not.
>
>
> My second problem is that alpine is sometimes unresponsive to changes in
> terminal size.  I suspect that SIGWINCH is not being handled correctly.
>
>
> See
> http://superuser.com/questions/667380/sigint-and-sigtstp-ignored-by-most-common-applications/680020#680020
> for an example of someone with similar but slightly different symptoms (he
> has problems with SIGINT, but my SIGINT works fine).
>
>
> Using 'pstree -ps $$' and then working my way up the tree with 'grep SigBlk
> /proc/$pid/status' shows 'SigBlk: 016717d03fdb4a00' for gnome-session but
> 'SigBlk: ' for its parents.  This makes me suspect that the
> problem originates in gnome-session.
>
>
> Any ideas?
>

If you're using the nvidia proprietary driver 331.20 then it's probably:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028272

> --
> Peter Oliver
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org



-- 
Ahmad Samir
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can't stand Gnome3, I think it's time for Fedora to move on

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 19:58:01 -0500,
  Rahul Sundaram  wrote:


The requirements for the installer is more than any desktop environment in
Fedora making Fedora not really a good choice for lower end systems
anyway.


It's not quite that bad. I was able to do a succesful install of f20 (games 
spin which is based on XFCE) on a laptop with 500 MiB of memory. Gnome also 
needs a more powerful video card than some other desktops. So while I 
agree that Fedora isn't the best distro for low resource machines, there 
is still an area where it is usable on the lighter weight desktops, but 
not gnome.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can't stand Gnome3, I think it's time for Fedora to move on

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 09:13:08 -0500,
  "Eddie G. O'Connor Jr."  wrote:
other version of Linux. I only wish I knew how to "code" so that I 
could contribute in some way, but alas,I'm still struggling with 
the Terminal and some commands (there's too many dang-blasted 
commands and switches!..g!) but I'll just keep chugging 
along..and who knows?...maybe if I get curious enough..I might 
actually go to school and find some classes on C++ / C#.


There are several ways you can help with coding. QA needs testers. Writing 
documentation is helpful. Ambassodars can use help. Answering questions 
for people on mailing lists and IRC is helpful.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

installin handbrake in Fedora 18 ?

[Jim]

Where can I get the RPMS for handbrake-gui and  handbrake-cli ?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Re: Display setting problem -

[Richard Sewill]

I hesitate trying to answer this question because what I am doing may be
wrong.

I tried the following on F18.

I edited the line, found in file /etc/default/grub, which starts
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rd.md=0 ... rhgb quiet"
appending strings so it had
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rd.md=0 ... rhgb quiet"
drm_kms_helper.edid_firmware=edid/1024x768.bin video=VGA-1:e

I next edited any existing lines in /boot/grub2/grub.cfg that had the
string "rhgb quiet" to include the
drm_kms_helper.edid_firmware=edid/1024x768.bin video=VGA-1:e
string which I since learned is the wrong things to do.

>From my limited understanding, /boot/grub2/grub.cfg is auto-generated using
/etc/default/grub each time /boot/grub2/grub.cfg is recreated.
I should have used the grub2-mkconfig command instead of editing
/boot/grub2/grub.cfg directly.

I got this idea reading
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Kernel_Mode_Setting#Forcing_modes_and_EDID
and
https://www.osadl.org/Single-View.111+M5b7fe294ea7.0.html

In my case I wish to run a headless server, but wish to have Linux believe
there is a certain size window if I vnc into the server using x11vnc on the
server.
My vnc client happens to run on a laptop with a screen size, 1024x768.

I do not know if you need the video=VGA-1:e because you indicated you have
a monitor connected.
I do not know if you can use one of the four standard timings that are
hard-coded in the driver.
Please note: there are notes saying this works only with certain drivers.
I am using the nouveau driver.
I don't know if this works if you are using the nvidia driver; a note in
one of the URLs said it did not work with the nvidia driver at one time.

Please save any files before editing.  You and I don't know if this will
work for you.  It's best to play it safe and have backups just in case.

>
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Display setting problem -

[poma]

On 25.11.2013 17:27, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:

> Ok, then I assume that to mean there is no better way.
> 

Please this time try to read carefully from top to bottom.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/425665

> This message is an interesting experiment in that I have copied your 
> response between Thunderbird in this F-19 computer to Thunderbird in the 
> VMware F-20 beta virtual machine. Hopefully it will still thread properly?
> 

U2 should know better after years of use.
F20 ain't an official, so
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


poma


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Re: Display setting problem -

[Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA]

On 11/25/2013 04:39 AM, poma wrote:

On 24.11.2013 17:00, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:


Anyone know a better way to deal with this? As it stands it is just one
of the things I do every morning after booting the computer ...


This question is already answered in detail.


poma



Ok, then I assume that to mean there is no better way.

This message is an interesting experiment in that I have copied your 
response between Thunderbird in this F-19 computer to Thunderbird in the 
VMware F-20 beta virtual machine. Hopefully it will still thread properly?


Thanks,

Bob


--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
Box 10VM Fedora-20/64 Beta XFCE Linux

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: ssh "GSSAPIAuthentication yes"

[inode0]

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Timothy Murphy  wrote:
> I see that in /etc/ssh/ssh_config I have the above setting
> in both Fedora-19 and CentOS-6.4 .
> In both cases ssh (openssh) tries and fails to use gssapi-with-mic
> authentication, with the message
> ===
> Unspecified GSS failure.  Minor code may provide more information
> No Kerberos credentials available
> ===
> It then goes on to use publickey authentication, successfully.

Do you have a keytab installed on the machine you are trying to login to?

John
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Why some say "rpm hell"

[AP]

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Tim  wrote:

> What happens when you break mail, in one way or another:  Your replies
> are not seen with the messages that they're related to.  They get
> missed, they get overlooked.  It gets very hard to follow an ongoing
> thread when all the messages in that thread are scattered randomly
> amongst hundreds of other messages, especially when it's important to be
> able to follow the progress of something along the thread (and no,
> quoting the entire thread in each message is not the answer).  Some
> helpers will give up helping after finding it a pain to follow an
> prolonged on-going conversation.  Some will give up immediately.  And if
> this converstion was on traditional usenet, rather than an email list,
> you'd be needing flameproof pants by now.  ;-)

Well, I agree but I simply reply in Firefox and by typing
www.gmail.com and nothing else!! This is the only way I do. Once I
log-in, I don't log-out ever (unless I have to check other gmail
account also, which I rarely use) and even if I have to use PC in
two-three days, I get directly Inbox because I didn't log out earlier!
I know since I am using Linux and with the addons like No Script, this
all is secured even when I am not logged out. But really I never
thought such technical aspects which are written above!
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: rsync errors (selinux?)

[poma]

On 25.11.2013 14:58, Daniel J Walsh wrote:

> Look in /var/log/audit/audit.log
> 
> ausearch -m avc -ts recent
> 
> After failure.
> 

You're playing so cool, obeying every rule
Dig a way down in your heart
You're burning yearning for some
Somebody to tell you that life ain't passing you by
I'm trying to tell you
It will if you don't even try
You'll get by if you'd only

Cut loose, footloose, kick off the Sunday shoes
Ooh-wee Marie shake it, shake it for me


poma

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: ssh "GSSAPIAuthentication yes"

[Mateusz Marzantowicz]

On 25.11.2013 15:10, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> What would I do if I actually wanted to use GSSAPIAuthentication?
> 

Install and configure FreeIPA on your network. That will let you manage
SSH keys in LDAP database and use Kerberos authentication. You can read
more in FreeIPA's documentation.



Mateusz Marzantowicz
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

ssh "GSSAPIAuthentication yes"

[Timothy Murphy]

I see that in /etc/ssh/ssh_config I have the above setting
in both Fedora-19 and CentOS-6.4 .
In both cases ssh (openssh) tries and fails to use gssapi-with-mic
authentication, with the message
===
Unspecified GSS failure.  Minor code may provide more information
No Kerberos credentials available
===
It then goes on to use publickey authentication, successfully.

As far as I can see, this is because openssh has over-ridden
the default
  #   GSSAPIAuthentication no
with
GSSAPIAuthentication yes

I've googled for this, and see that some people recommend
reverting to the default No.
But I assume openssh has some reason for making this change.

What would I do if I actually wanted to use GSSAPIAuthentication?

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: rsync errors (selinux?)

[Daniel J Walsh]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11/25/2013 07:51 AM, poma wrote:
> On 24.11.2013 19:03, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>> 
>> For several years I've been doing an rsync across-the-lan backup for home
>> directories.  All has worked well until recently (well, since the fedup
>> to f20 last night).  Now backups are failing with an inscrutable rsync
>> error.  While the errors mention selinux, I don't see any errors in
>> either the sending or receiving machines /var/log/secure logfiles.
> ..
>> Any ideas what's up and what I need to do to get this working again?
> 
> You should know better after all these years of use. F20 ain't an official,
> so https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
> 
> 
> poma
> 
> 
Look in /var/log/audit/audit.log

ausearch -m avc -ts recent

After failure.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlKTV3QACgkQrlYvE4MpobP5YACfaUmLw5sslHZ2ATsMH+sBrBu+
o/gAoJ8Cb7syeKxl1+HiDmbOLtaUt+WK
=Zvw2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can't stand Gnome3, I think it's time for Fedora to move on

[poma]

On 21.11.2013 23:10, Hugh Caley wrote:
> I'm voting for Cinnamon, since the developer of compiz isn't interested 
> in keeping it going.  But maybe if MATE was the default for Fedora he'd 
> change his mind?  Or someone else would take over?
> 

Cut loose, footloose, kick off the Sunday shoes
Ooh-wee Marie shake it, shake it for me
Woah, Milo come on, come on let's go
Lose your blues, everybody cut footloose

http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/mmaslano/22711161/1251/1251_original.png
Bee awesome.!


poma


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: rsync errors (selinux?)

[poma]

On 24.11.2013 19:03, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> 
> For several years I've been doing an rsync across-the-lan backup for
> home directories.  All has worked well until recently (well, since the
> fedup to f20 last night).  Now backups are failing with an inscrutable
> rsync error.  While the errors mention selinux, I don't see any errors
> in either the sending or receiving machines /var/log/secure logfiles.
..
> Any ideas what's up and what I need to do to get this working again?

You should know better after all these years of use.
F20 ain't an official, so
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


poma


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Display setting problem CORRECTION-

[poma]

On 24.11.2013 17:00, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> CORRECTION: Fedora-19
> 
> I have a ViewSonic VX2035wm LCD Display monitor on this computer that is 
> not recognized by Fedora-19. in order to get a reasonable display I have 
> to run /usr/bin/xrandr -s 1680x1050 after I am logged in and the display 
> [XFCE] is running. That works for me but it seems a bit clunky and after 
> doing so for more than a year I would like to find some more elegant way 
> to deal with it.
> 
> I could use a different monitor but I prefer the aspect ratio of this 
> one, it's wide but higher than the others available.
> 
> Anyone know a better way to deal with this? As it stands it is just one 
> of the things I do every morning after booting the computer ...
> 

This question is already answered in detail.


poma


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: NetworkManager-l2tp requires kernel-debug ??

[poma]

On 25.11.2013 10:48, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I'm on an F19 system running KDE and wanting to install kde-plasma-nm-l2tp.  
> One of its dependencies is NetworkManager-l2tp which is pulling in 
> kernel-debug and kernel-debug-modules-extra.
> 
> Does anyone know why this would be the case?
> 
> 

yum install NetworkManager-l2tp
..
Installed:
  NetworkManager-l2tp.x86_64 0:0.9.8-4.fc19

Dependency Installed:
  kernel-modules-extra.x86_64 0:3.11.9-200.fc19
  libreswan.x86_64 0:3.5-2.fc19
  xl2tpd.x86_64 0:1.3.1-13.fc19


poma

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

NetworkManager-l2tp requires kernel-debug ??

[Ed Greshko]

I'm on an F19 system running KDE and wanting to install kde-plasma-nm-l2tp.  
One of its dependencies is NetworkManager-l2tp which is pulling in kernel-debug 
and kernel-debug-modules-extra.

Does anyone know why this would be the case?


-- 
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: qemu-system-x86 eat 400% CPU

[James Hogarth]

On 25 November 2013 04:20, Frantisek Hanzlik  wrote:

> On Fedora 19/x86_64, Xeon 4cores/8threads, 8GB RAM I have in a VM
> installed windows 2000 (full qemu cmdline see below). What is weird,
> 'top' on host show that all 4 threads load CPU at 100% each. On guest
> are running only minimum processes and windows task manager show load
> 0-2%; virtual machine is almost idle. VM itself seems react well, its
> responses are fine.
>

I've seen this behaviour before on Windows guests with incorrect HAL
(non-ACPI) causing the guests to basically busy spin on the CPUs ...

I had to rebuild the box with an appropriate HAL to get it to behave
sanely...

Incidentally your performance in that guest will always be fairly poor due
to a lack of virtio drivers and windows 2000 has been out of support for a
few years now ... you really should not be using it in general...
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org