Re: [389-users] Sync from RDBMS to LDAP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30/04/14 01:00, Fong, Trevor wrote: Thanks a lot for the lead, Jeff – I’ll check it out. For the thread – there’s also Ldap Sync Connector from lsc-project.org, which is open source, but commercial support is preferred. We use lsc for a variety of data synchronization tasks, including DBMS - - LDAP, LDAP - LDAP and LDAP - DBMS. I recommend it highly. Other suggestions welcome! Trev *From:*389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Clowser, Jeff *Sent:* April-29-14 7:02 AM *To:* 'General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.' *Subject:* Re: [389-users] Sync from RDBMS to LDAP If you want a commercial solution, take a look at the Unbound ID Synchronization server. Depending on how complex your needs are, that may work. This e-mail and its attachments are confidential and solely for the intended addressee(s). Do not share or use them without Fannie Mae’s approval. If received in error, contact the sender and delete them. *From:*389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Paul Robert Marino *Sent:* Tuesday, April 29, 2014 8:55 AM *To:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. *Subject:* Re: [389-users] Sync from RDBMS to LDAP Sorry that kind of thing is always a custom scripting job. -- Sent from my HP Pre3 On Apr 28, 2014 13:27, Fong, Trevor trevor.f...@ubc.ca mailto:trevor.f...@ubc.ca wrote: **Bump** Surely we can’t be the only ones who want to this? Trev *From:*Fong, Trevor *Sent:* April-22-14 3:33 PM *To:* '389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org' *Subject:* Sync from RDBMS to LDAP Hi Everyone, We are in the process of migrating from an old OpenLDAP service to 389-DS. We currently synchronise users and attributes from an Oracle DB to OpenLDAP service using an aging set of custom scripts and DB triggers. We would like to do something similar for 389-DS but using a commercial-off-the-shelf solution. I was wondering what the good people on this list use or would recommend? Thanks in advance, Trev - Trevor Fong – Senior Programmer Analyst Identity and Access Management Group University of British Columbia – Information Technology 6356 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2, Canada Ph: (604) 827-5247 -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users - -- Dr Robin Garner Technology Services Southern Cross University P: +61 2 6620 3281 M: +61 418 619 500 http://cs.anu.edu.au/people/robin.garner/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTY0tVAAoJEHm9xBvoMhvaCs8IAICoiIxynIbwt2m9GUXnkGPH pw6MDwI7lwci49Oh/MNv3K5D0p61fpBJcm77sBDSPtnHO/VwvpFsWF/R+mAoF90N saGyGey+AxT36JFOIjWpy3vX/ZO4Vqr21Nq2lxnglwZkekTn0kRG84pt7pg0to/D 7Ic0s0zuS7OcN6+uOLJ7IcqNB3+JhLSFlWaxuie6OrhPsOBj3ZxSx2+RFSrOfOz7 YZqP13QzucuzsTmHGla2cWvUSMlQ2IqHZsE7zHV6QFweg4pwbEGSHpSNujTas29a pqwjDPJ9P9vsUBNZXl76ahXOvvyJFX4BvXhMWAyA/gcV3WIuiqg9s2+TpHUZAFo= =3WBJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: Gnome weather extension as malware?
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Unless you're actually in the airport control tower, or flying a plane, I doubt you need to keep updating a weather report that often. LOL your comment made my day. Well said. :) Although by reading some other mailing lists, I could quickly conclude that some people are not flying planes but are still high above the ground... ;-) FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verdad se convierte en un Acto Revolucionario - George Orwell -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild
Dne St 30. dubna 2014 20:34:29, Patrick Laimbock napsal(a):
On 30-04-14 20:25, Patrick Dupre wrote:
[snip]
You compare the files listed in the %files section to what is installed
in BUILDROOT/perl-tk-zinc-.../...
ls ../BUILDROOT/perl-tk-zinc-3.303-1.fc20.x86_64/usr
bin lib lib64 share src
!!
compared to:
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Copyright README
%{_bindir}/*
%{_mandir}/man1/*.1.gz
%{perl_vendorarch}/auto/*
%{perl_vendorarch}/tk*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
How can make it match?
There seems to be a difference in where the spec file expects the perl
files and where they are installed. I guess you need to fix that in the
spec file or some ask someone who knows perl (I don't). Maybe try in
#rpm on irc.freenode.net or perhaps there is an rpm mailing list.
Just to set the right expectation, #rpm on Freenode is channel for rpm5. The
right channels for Fedora are either #rpm.org or #yum.
Thanks
Jan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild
I fixed the issue by modifying the .spc file.
Mainly commenting the %doc and changing tk* in Tk*
Dne St 30. dubna 2014 20:34:29, Patrick Laimbock napsal(a):
On 30-04-14 20:25, Patrick Dupre wrote:
[snip]
You compare the files listed in the %files section to what is installed
in BUILDROOT/perl-tk-zinc-.../...
ls ../BUILDROOT/perl-tk-zinc-3.303-1.fc20.x86_64/usr
bin lib lib64 share src
!!
compared to:
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Copyright README
%{_bindir}/*
%{_mandir}/man1/*.1.gz
%{perl_vendorarch}/auto/*
%{perl_vendorarch}/tk*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
How can make it match?
There seems to be a difference in where the spec file expects the perl
files and where they are installed. I guess you need to fix that in the
spec file or some ask someone who knows perl (I don't). Maybe try in
#rpm on irc.freenode.net or perhaps there is an rpm mailing list.
Just to set the right expectation, #rpm on Freenode is channel for rpm5. The
right channels for Fedora are either #rpm.org or #yum.
Thanks
Jan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
vnc
Hello, I am trying to understand the port configuration. With firewall-config, I can set the part range of the vnc-server let say from 5900-5903 Then as a user, I can open/kill the ports by using vncserver But I do not understand the link. :1 does not seems to by associated with 5900 or 5901? how can I manage this? Thnak. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 20 Update: unetbootin-603-1.fc20
On 05/01/2014 11:22 PM, Tim wrote: Then it appears to run, if I close the warning. I haven't actually tested, yet, whether it manages to run successfully. But a few things spring to mind: If it really *requires* to be run as root, why is it in a menu where it cannot? We don't have a "run as" (someone else) option like Windows has. Well, at least the mate desktop does not. Why doesn't the menu call it in a way where appropriate permissions are requested as you call it? Other things that need it, such as various system configurators, get you to type in your password, or the root password, before the thing continues on. If it has to be run from the command line, why's there a menu entry? Have I missed something? (Before I go through the tortures of trying to make a bugzilla report.) I just installed it on my fedora 20 amd_64 system, and ran it from a user command line. It brought up a " run as root" password box.. -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 20 Update: unetbootin-603-1.fc20
On 05/01/2014 11:22 PM, Tim wrote: On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 22:23 +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: UNetbootin allows you to create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions from Windows or Linux, without requiring you to burn a CD. You can either let it download one of the many distributions supported out-of-the-box for you, or supply your own Linux .iso file if you've already downloaded one or your preferred distribution isn't on the list. I thought I'd give this a try, and ran it from the menu, since it was listed there, only to get this warning message: UNetbootin must be run as root. Close it, and re-run using either: sudo /usr/bin/unetbootin or: su - -c '/usr/bin/unetbootin' Then it appears to run, if I close the warning. I haven't actually tested, yet, whether it manages to run successfully. But a few things spring to mind: If it really *requires* to be run as root, why is it in a menu where it cannot? We don't have a run as (someone else) option like Windows has. Well, at least the mate desktop does not. Why doesn't the menu call it in a way where appropriate permissions are requested as you call it? Other things that need it, such as various system configurators, get you to type in your password, or the root password, before the thing continues on. If it has to be run from the command line, why's there a menu entry? Have I missed something? (Before I go through the tortures of trying to make a bugzilla report.) the run as root - KDE su box says Command: /usr/bin/unetbootin rootcheck=no so if it says rootcheck=no, why is it requesting root password?? -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
bitcoin miner
I have been reading about bitcoins lately thought I would install look at it. from the bitcoin.org web site I tried to install every miner program they showed, without success. always dependency issues or errors. Is there a bitcoin miner program that works for fedora 20 amd_64?? -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Disabling users after a period of time
Hello, Fedudes! So this is the situation: I have a server called El Servidor de la Comunidad or The Community Server. This servers provides old fashioned hosting to GNU Linux and Fedora enthusiasts. Everybody has a shell and their websites are all in /srv/www; owned by them and their group; allowing the world to enter. Basically, everything has 2771 from /srv/www and up; until it reaches the actual document root; where people have what they please. So, since we're not an ISP; just a bunch o' loosers, we do not have an idea of when a user needs to renew the yearly subscription, which is $100. Anyway, I thought of using usermod -e; which is the expire flag. But this will not disable their websites along with the user, since the files are out of their home dir; which we will never support. So, I need good ideas on how to make their websites go away with a this guy doesn't pay... message. This is to avoid the possibility of somebody not paying for the service; which covers the bills for the server. So, if anybody has a great idea, this is the time to spit it out. Thanks guys; in advance. p.s. Please, do not pollute this email with rants about how 2771 doesn't provide actual security or why should we put stuff at /home; which we will not do. Focus on clean, simple, ingenious solutions, if you may. -- Renich Bon Ciric ren...@woralelandia.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 20 Update: unetbootin-603-1.fc20
On 02/05/14 11:19, Paul Cartwright wrote: On 05/01/2014 11:22 PM, Tim wrote: On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 22:23 +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: UNetbootin allows you to create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions from Windows or Linux, without requiring you to burn a CD. You can either let it download one of the many distributions supported out-of-the-box for you, or supply your own Linux .iso file if you've already downloaded one or your preferred distribution isn't on the list. I thought I'd give this a try, and ran it from the menu, since it was listed there, only to get this warning message: UNetbootin must be run as root. Close it, and re-run using either: sudo /usr/bin/unetbootin or: su - -c '/usr/bin/unetbootin' Then it appears to run, if I close the warning. I haven't actually tested, yet, whether it manages to run successfully. But a few things spring to mind: If it really *requires* to be run as root, why is it in a menu where it cannot? We don't have a run as (someone else) option like Windows has. Well, at least the mate desktop does not. Why doesn't the menu call it in a way where appropriate permissions are requested as you call it? Other things that need it, such as various system configurators, get you to type in your password, or the root password, before the thing continues on. If it has to be run from the command line, why's there a menu entry? Have I missed something? (Before I go through the tortures of trying to make a bugzilla report.) the run as root - KDE su box says Command: /usr/bin/unetbootin rootcheck=no so if it says rootcheck=no, why is it requesting root password?? Because it won't issue that command until you have responded to the prompt? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Escape character is '^]'.
Hello once ^] was working fine but from some releases (i dunno which) into Konsole ^] does Enlarge fonts so, it is like: ^] = ^++ this is very ugly I just search into Edit profile/Keyboard/Default (XFree4) but I as not able to do anything Did you know how to remap it? -m smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: FC14 - FC20 Evolution
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 20:55 -0400, Charlie McVeigh wrote: Okay, I have to admit I gave been lazy and have fallen far behind the the curve on Fedora releases. I am currently running FC14 and I want to upgrade to FC20. My question for the board is as follows: Since I am so far behind the current release of Fedora will I have any trouble restoring a backup of my Evolution files to FC20 Evolution once I upgrade? I have searched the web for advice on this but I can't find any information that answers this question. I am concerned that I am making too big of a leap in Evolution versions and need to consider an intermediate step of upgrading to FC16 or FC17, restoring my Evolution data and backing it up again to make the leap to FC20. Currently running FC14 Evolution 2.32.3 I would strongly advise checking the Evolution mailing list archives (https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list) where there has been recent discussion of this. 2.32 is a really old version and data formats have changed substantially. That said, a lot depends on your account setup. If you keep everything on IMAP it will be a lot less painful. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
webmin
Hello, I was unable to install webmin by using yum: nothing to do! Hence, I was wondering it there some conflicts with fedora or if it just not recommanded to use it! Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
remmina
Hello, I was trying to terminate (logout or close) a remmina-vnc session, not just disconnect! When I reconnect, I wish to start a brand new session. Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 20 Update: unetbootin-603-1.fc20
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Paul Cartwright pbcartwri...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/01/2014 11:22 PM, Tim wrote: On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 22:23 +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: UNetbootin allows you to create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions from Windows or Linux, without requiring you to burn a CD. You can either let it download one of the many distributions supported out-of-the-box for you, or supply your own Linux .iso file if you've already downloaded one or your preferred distribution isn't on the list. I thought I'd give this a try, and ran it from the menu, since it was listed there, only to get this warning message: UNetbootin must be run as root. Close it, and re-run using either: sudo /usr/bin/unetbootin or: su - -c '/usr/bin/unetbootin' Then it appears to run, if I close the warning. I haven't actually tested, yet, whether it manages to run successfully. But a few things spring to mind: If it really *requires* to be run as root, why is it in a menu where it cannot? We don't have a run as (someone else) option like Windows has. Well, at least the mate desktop does not. Why doesn't the menu call it in a way where appropriate permissions are requested as you call it? Other things that need it, such as various system configurators, get you to type in your password, or the root password, before the thing continues on. If it has to be run from the command line, why's there a menu entry? Have I missed something? (Before I go through the tortures of trying to make a bugzilla report.) the run as root - KDE su box says Command: /usr/bin/unetbootin rootcheck=no so if it says rootcheck=no, why is it requesting root password?? -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org You have two option either ignore or enter password. If you ignore it will give you access to the unetbootin but not allow you to write or format the disk, which is obvious, and on the other hand if you do enter root password it gets access to your flash drive. -- Regards, Sudhir Khanger. sudhirkhanger.com https://github.com/donniezazen -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
packages
Hello, I made the following packages because they either do not existed or because they were wrong. I can donate them to the community if it make sense. perl-Chart-Clicker-2.88-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Chart-GRACE-0.95-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Color-Scheme-1.06-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-define-1.02-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Forest-0.10-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Geometry-Primitive-0.24-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Graphics-Color-0.29-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Graphics-Primitive-0.65-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Graphics-Primitive-Driver-Cairo-0.46-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Layout-Manager-0.35-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Math-Function-Roots-0.065-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Math-Integral-Romberg-0.04-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Sort-Fields-0.90-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-String-Scanf-2.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Text-Flow-0.01-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Tk-FontDialog-0.17-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Tk-LineGraphDataset-0.01-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Tk-PlotDataset-2.04-1.fc19.noarch.rpm system-config-lvm-1.1.18-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Math-GSL-0.27-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.67-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm perl-PDL-LinearAlgebra-0.08-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm perl-tk-zinc-3.303-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm The i686 versions are also available. There are running fine, however, 1 or 2 may require to be installed with rpm and the --nodeps option. This is not clear why, because the packages are already installed! === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: webmin
On 05/02/2014 07:11 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, I was unable to install webmin by using yum: nothing to do! Hence, I was wondering it there some conflicts with fedora or if it just not recommanded to use it! You have to get the rpm from the webmin site, then do a 'yum localinstall'. Anyway, that is how I do it. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: webmin
Try download the RPM file. There are another admin tool like webmin you may like them http://www.tecmint.com/web-control-panels-to-manage-linux-servers/ -- Cheers! Dodi Linkedin: http://goo.gl/3eJ9UI In business do not look for credits, look for innovation! On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.comwrote: On 05/02/2014 07:11 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, I was unable to install webmin by using yum: nothing to do! Hence, I was wondering it there some conflicts with fedora or if it just not recommanded to use it! You have to get the rpm from the webmin site, then do a 'yum localinstall'. Anyway, that is how I do it. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: perl
On 30 April 2014 19:01, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:
Hello,
I do not understand,
I have 2 machines fedora 20 x86_64.
On one my application run fine, on the other one I get an error:
Perl API version v5.16.0 of PDL::Core does not match v5.18.0 at
/usr/lib64/perl5/DynaLoader.pm line 213.
Compilation failed in require at (eval 42) line 6.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 42) line 6.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/home/pdupre/Spectroscopy/Stepram/Input_windows.pm line 12.
At line 12 there is
use PDL ;
Both perl-PDL are the same.
How can I debug?
The error says that one of your machines has a version of PDL
installed that was built against the wrong version of Perl. You have
Perl 5.18 installed, but the PDL library was build for Perl 5.16. PDL
is an XS-based library. That means that a lot of it is made up of C
code. Perl doesn't guarantee binary compatibility between major
versions so XS-based libraries need to be rebuilt for a new version.
The question then becomes, how did your system get into that state. I
can suggest two possibilities.
1/ Your system was upgraded from a previous version of Fedora which
was running Perl 5.16 and for some reason the upgrade didn't pull in
the new version of the RPM. You say that both systems have the same
perl-PDL installed, but how similar are they? They might be the same
version number but built for different Perl versions (or, rather,
different versions of Fedora). What do you get if you run 'rpm -q
perl-PDL' on each of the systems?
If this is the problem, then you can probably fix it by running yum
reinstall perl-PDL.
2/ Your system was upgraded from previous version of Fedora which was
running Perl 5.16 and that older installation had a version of PDL
which was installed through cpan, not rpm/yum. It's possible that the
cpan-installed version is in an different directory to the
yum-installed version and that the cpan-installed version's directory
appears earlier on the @INC path. This would mean the Perl completely
ignores the yum-installed version. Try running these three command and
report back what you get.
perl -MPDL -le'print $INC{PDL.pm}'
rpm -ql perl-PDL | grep PDL.pm
perl -le'print $_ for @INC'
Hope this helps,
Dave...
--
Dave Cross :: d...@dave.org.uk
http://dave.org.uk/
@davorg
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: perl
YEs,
Thank you.
I found the issue.
There were 2 perl-PDL installed for a while.
I cleaned every things right.
On 30 April 2014 19:01, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:
Hello,
I do not understand,
I have 2 machines fedora 20 x86_64.
On one my application run fine, on the other one I get an error:
Perl API version v5.16.0 of PDL::Core does not match v5.18.0 at
/usr/lib64/perl5/DynaLoader.pm line 213.
Compilation failed in require at (eval 42) line 6.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 42) line 6.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/home/pdupre/Spectroscopy/Stepram/Input_windows.pm line 12.
At line 12 there is
use PDL ;
Both perl-PDL are the same.
How can I debug?
The error says that one of your machines has a version of PDL
installed that was built against the wrong version of Perl. You have
Perl 5.18 installed, but the PDL library was build for Perl 5.16. PDL
is an XS-based library. That means that a lot of it is made up of C
code. Perl doesn't guarantee binary compatibility between major
versions so XS-based libraries need to be rebuilt for a new version.
The question then becomes, how did your system get into that state. I
can suggest two possibilities.
1/ Your system was upgraded from a previous version of Fedora which
was running Perl 5.16 and for some reason the upgrade didn't pull in
the new version of the RPM. You say that both systems have the same
perl-PDL installed, but how similar are they? They might be the same
version number but built for different Perl versions (or, rather,
different versions of Fedora). What do you get if you run 'rpm -q
perl-PDL' on each of the systems?
If this is the problem, then you can probably fix it by running yum
reinstall perl-PDL.
2/ Your system was upgraded from previous version of Fedora which was
running Perl 5.16 and that older installation had a version of PDL
which was installed through cpan, not rpm/yum. It's possible that the
cpan-installed version is in an different directory to the
yum-installed version and that the cpan-installed version's directory
appears earlier on the @INC path. This would mean the Perl completely
ignores the yum-installed version. Try running these three command and
report back what you get.
perl -MPDL -le'print $INC{PDL.pm}'
rpm -ql perl-PDL | grep PDL.pm
perl -le'print $_ for @INC'
Hope this helps,
Dave...
--
Dave Cross :: d...@dave.org.uk
http://dave.org.uk/
@davorg
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: packages
On May 2, 2014 5:49 AM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: Hello, I made the following packages because they either do not existed or because they were wrong. I can donate them to the community if it make sense. perl-Chart-Clicker-2.88-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Chart-GRACE-0.95-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Color-Scheme-1.06-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-define-1.02-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Forest-0.10-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Geometry-Primitive-0.24-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Graphics-Color-0.29-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Graphics-Primitive-0.65-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Graphics-Primitive-Driver-Cairo-0.46-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Layout-Manager-0.35-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Math-Function-Roots-0.065-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Math-Integral-Romberg-0.04-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Sort-Fields-0.90-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-String-Scanf-2.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Text-Flow-0.01-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Tk-FontDialog-0.17-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Tk-LineGraphDataset-0.01-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Tk-PlotDataset-2.04-1.fc19.noarch.rpm system-config-lvm-1.1.18-1.fc20.noarch.rpm perl-Math-GSL-0.27-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.67-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm perl-PDL-LinearAlgebra-0.08-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm perl-tk-zinc-3.303-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm The i686 versions are also available. There are running fine, however, 1 or 2 may require to be installed with rpm and the --nodeps option. This is not clear why, because the packages are already installed! === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France == Great! Would you like assistance filing bugs against wrong packages, or perhaps assistance becoming a packager for the nonexistent ones? --Pete -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
fail2ban on fc20
Hello, Is anyone running fail2ban on fc20 with firewalld? I'm trying to get this working and finding a lot of bug reports on this but not an rpm that goes out of the box. I'd prefer not to have to revert to iptables but I want to stop brute force attempts. Thanks. Dave. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: bitcoin miner
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:22:10 -0400, Paul Cartwright pbcartwri...@gmail.com wrote: I have been reading about bitcoins lately thought I would install look at it. from the bitcoin.org web site I tried to install every miner program they showed, without success. always dependency issues or errors. Is there a bitcoin miner program that works for fedora 20 amd_64?? I'd only recommend doing this for fun. Mining bitcoins is probably going to cost you more in power, than you can sell them for. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: bitcoin miner
Oh man.It's already too late 2014-05-02 16:46 GMT+02:00 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to: On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:22:10 -0400, Paul Cartwright pbcartwri...@gmail.com wrote: I have been reading about bitcoins lately thought I would install look at it. from the bitcoin.org web site I tried to install every miner program they showed, without success. always dependency issues or errors. Is there a bitcoin miner program that works for fedora 20 amd_64?? I'd only recommend doing this for fun. Mining bitcoins is probably going to cost you more in power, than you can sell them for. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- MfG Cheng(誠) http://freakrobot.blogbus.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: KDE using sudo instead of su
Emmett Culley wrote: On 04/30/2014 10:27 AM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 04/30/2014 08:25 AM, Emmett Culley wrote: Any ideas how to get apps to require the root password instead of my user password? Take yourself out of wheel. I was in the users group, but not in the wheel group. Also, I have all sudoers disabled except for root. Still, I get prompted for my users password. Something to do with polkit? Yes polkit. The curious thing is that polkit default configuration is supposed to work as you describe: admin user (in wheel) group: allow user password non admin user: require root password -- Rex -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: bitcoin miner
You are better off buying bitcoin than mining it right now. Last I checked it's down in the $450s (from last year's bubble of above $1,500) On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:57 AM, cheng chen basaka.c...@gmail.com wrote: Oh man.It's already too late 2014-05-02 16:46 GMT+02:00 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to: On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:22:10 -0400, Paul Cartwright pbcartwri...@gmail.com wrote: I have been reading about bitcoins lately thought I would install look at it. from the bitcoin.org web site I tried to install every miner program they showed, without success. always dependency issues or errors. Is there a bitcoin miner program that works for fedora 20 amd_64?? I'd only recommend doing this for fun. Mining bitcoins is probably going to cost you more in power, than you can sell them for. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- MfG Cheng(誠) http://freakrobot.blogbus.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: bitcoin miner
On 05/02/2014 12:14 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: You are better off buying bitcoin than mining it right now. Last I checked it's down in the $450s (from last year's bubble of above $1,500) I don't plan on doing any full-scale mining, I just wanted to see the process.. At least I have bitcoin installed, have my own wallet and a miner installed. Yeah, I know it crashed, but I was just curious to see how it works.. -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: bitcoin miner
I've been able to compile and run bfgminer on my 64bit machine with no problems. On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Paul Cartwright pbcartwri...@gmail.comwrote: On 05/02/2014 12:14 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: You are better off buying bitcoin than mining it right now. Last I checked it's down in the $450s (from last year's bubble of above $1,500) I don't plan on doing any full-scale mining, I just wanted to see the process.. At least I have bitcoin installed, have my own wallet and a miner installed. Yeah, I know it crashed, but I was just curious to see how it works.. -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Trouble starting webex in F20
On 05/01/2014 06:26 PM, Chris Kottaridis wrote: On 05/01/2014 05:08 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 05/01/2014 01:40 PM, Andrew Azores issued this missive: On 05/01/2014 04:27 PM, Chris Kottaridis wrote: On 05/01/2014 02:11 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote: * Chris Kottaridis chris...@quietwind.net [2014-05-01 13:25]: I have an F19 and an F20 host and when I try to start a webex on the F20 host it doesn't work right. It works fine on the F19 machine. The symptom is that when I start the webex in F20 it sends up a message about wanting to run an applet and I tell it yes it's OK to run the applet. That doesn't come up on the F19 host. On the F19 the icedtea icon pops up for a short time and then I get connected. I don't see the icedtea icon pop up in F20. I did notice that icedtea is at 1.5 in F20, but at 1.4 for F19 and there is some policy control added in 1.5. I set the policy to allow all applets to do everything for the time being in the .config/icedtea-web/security/java.policy file which the icedtea-web man page says is the default policy file. Any ideas on what the difference might be between F19 and F20 would be appreciated or pointer to a different group that could help. Sorry that I only have rather high level usage info, but so far other then this issue with starting a webex everything seems OK that I have tried so far. Hi Chris, Is it possible for us to reproduce this? If so, what are the steps? You'd need a webex account. Hmm, there's no way to reproduce it with the test meeting [0] ? After some more playing it seems the issue is when I try to share my desktop it doesn't get shared in F20, but does in F19. So the Webex applet is successfully starting with both, then? That is what's so weird is it works like a champ in F19. I assume there is just something missing, maybe something I need to install or some permission or configuration setting. I haven't found anything in any log files yet to help point to what the problem might be. When I connect to webex to start a session if I click on Activities I see a webex icon of a ball that is half green and half blue and the name is sun-applet-PluginMain on the activites list. After I click on share desktop I see a second icon like that which says Atasjni on the F19, but still only have the one on F20. So, it seems some app is having trouble getting started when I click to share desktop. So, far I haven't found any complaint in any log file though. Thanks Chris Kottaridis Do you have any log files at all to share? You can also try launching your browser from terminal (assuming this is starting through a browser at all), and capture the output with a redirect or tee there. Also, just a note that IcedTea-Web 1.5 is available for Fedora 19 as well. Although if you appear to be having problems after the 1.5 update, I wouldn't recommend you update to it yet - not until we figure out what's going on here! With 1.5 on both Fedora 19 (native) and 20 (VM), Webex works fine, but I haven't tried this 'share desktop' functionality. [0] http://www.webex.com/test-meeting.html Also check to see if there's perhaps a SELinux alert going along with this. There may be changes to selinux configs that block sharing the desktop. I don't know a lot about selinux, but I used the SELinux management tool to just disable SELinux. So, I assume SELinux is out of the picture for now. But, I think it is probably some local configuration issue like that. Thanks Chris Kottaridis -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART? - -- Putting SELinux into permissive mode, would have been plenty. Setting the machine to disabled will only take place on the next reboot. If SELinux is blocking the web browser from sharing desktop you could turn off one of these booleans, which would probably fix your problem. unconfined_chrome_sandbox_transition -- on unconfined_mozilla_plugin_transition -- on setsebool -P unconfined_chrome_sandbox_transition 0 setsebool -P unconfined_mozilla_plugin_transition 0 You would need to restart the browser. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Trouble starting webex in F20
On 05/02/2014 12:07 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: On 05/01/2014 06:26 PM, Chris Kottaridis wrote: On 05/01/2014 05:08 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 05/01/2014 01:40 PM, Andrew Azores issued this missive: On 05/01/2014 04:27 PM, Chris Kottaridis wrote: On 05/01/2014 02:11 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote: * Chris Kottaridis chris...@quietwind.net [2014-05-01 13:25]: I have an F19 and an F20 host and when I try to start a webex on the F20 host it doesn't work right. It works fine on the F19 machine. The symptom is that when I start the webex in F20 it sends up a message about wanting to run an applet and I tell it yes it's OK to run the applet. That doesn't come up on the F19 host. On the F19 the icedtea icon pops up for a short time and then I get connected. I don't see the icedtea icon pop up in F20. I did notice that icedtea is at 1.5 in F20, but at 1.4 for F19 and there is some policy control added in 1.5. I set the policy to allow all applets to do everything for the time being in the .config/icedtea-web/security/java.policy file which the icedtea-web man page says is the default policy file. Any ideas on what the difference might be between F19 and F20 would be appreciated or pointer to a different group that could help. Sorry that I only have rather high level usage info, but so far other then this issue with starting a webex everything seems OK that I have tried so far. Hi Chris, Is it possible for us to reproduce this? If so, what are the steps? You'd need a webex account. Hmm, there's no way to reproduce it with the test meeting [0] ? After some more playing it seems the issue is when I try to share my desktop it doesn't get shared in F20, but does in F19. So the Webex applet is successfully starting with both, then? That is what's so weird is it works like a champ in F19. I assume there is just something missing, maybe something I need to install or some permission or configuration setting. I haven't found anything in any log files yet to help point to what the problem might be. When I connect to webex to start a session if I click on Activities I see a webex icon of a ball that is half green and half blue and the name is sun-applet-PluginMain on the activites list. After I click on share desktop I see a second icon like that which says Atasjni on the F19, but still only have the one on F20. So, it seems some app is having trouble getting started when I click to share desktop. So, far I haven't found any complaint in any log file though. Thanks Chris Kottaridis Do you have any log files at all to share? You can also try launching your browser from terminal (assuming this is starting through a browser at all), and capture the output with a redirect or tee there. Also, just a note that IcedTea-Web 1.5 is available for Fedora 19 as well. Although if you appear to be having problems after the 1.5 update, I wouldn't recommend you update to it yet - not until we figure out what's going on here! With 1.5 on both Fedora 19 (native) and 20 (VM), Webex works fine, but I haven't tried this 'share desktop' functionality. [0] http://www.webex.com/test-meeting.html Also check to see if there's perhaps a SELinux alert going along with this. There may be changes to selinux configs that block sharing the desktop. I don't know a lot about selinux, but I used the SELinux management tool to just disable SELinux. So, I assume SELinux is out of the picture for now. But, I think it is probably some local configuration issue like that. Thanks Chris Kottaridis -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - - - - We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART? - -- Putting SELinux into permissive mode, would have been plenty. Setting the machine to disabled will only take place on the next reboot. If SELinux is blocking the web browser from sharing desktop you could turn off one of these booleans, which would probably fix your problem. unconfined_chrome_sandbox_transition -- on unconfined_mozilla_plugin_transition -- on setsebool -P unconfined_chrome_sandbox_transition 0 setsebool -P unconfined_mozilla_plugin_transition 0 You would need to restart the browser. I have rebooted many times after disabling SELinux, it was getting in the way of other issues and so for the time being I just want to get it out of the way. Thanks for the pointers though. Once I get things right I'll re-enable it and make sure to make the changes you recommend. Thanks Chris Kottaridis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines:
Re: Disabling users after a period of time
Allegedly, on or about 02 May 2014, Renich Bon Ciric sent: since we're not an ISP; just a bunch o' loosers, we do not have an idea of when a user needs to renew the yearly subscription, which is $100. Sounds like you need some kind of diary program. When someone pays their dues, you record how much and when, and then set two future events to happen. An expiry date that disables their website, and an invoice date for at least a couple of weeks before the expiry. If you really are only a small group, you mightn't even need to automate it, just use an ordinary non-computer desk diary. But there are various calendar programs about, and you can set what happens on those dates, including running programs rather than just popping up messages or playing alarm noises. I dare say you could find one that would let you run a script on a date that could do the emailing and account disabling. i.e. Have a look at what diary or calendar programs you can easily install, and see if any fit your needs. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Disabling users after a period of time
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 05:38:03AM -0500, Renich Bon Ciric wrote: Anyway, I thought of using usermod -e; which is the expire flag. But this will not disable their websites along with the user, since the files are out of their home dir; which we will never support. There are a lot of possibilities, but here is one way. Use that flag suggested, and also run a nightly cron job which looks at the account experiation date field in /etc/shadow (it's the next-to-last one -- see `man 5 shadow`). This is in days since Jan 1, 1970. Compare that to the _current_ days since that time `echo $(($(date +%s) / 86400))` and if the number is higher, drop in the webserver configuration which redirects to the expired notice. -- Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project--mat...@fedoraproject.org Tepid change for the somewhat better! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Yum fails to install kernel-devel
yum -y update updated more than 11500 packages, because I had not run updates for quite a while. Everything installed except for kernel-devel. So, I downloaded the file directly from http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/updates/20/x86_64/kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm then I ran yum -y install kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm Here is the info off the screen: # yum -y install kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit Examining kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm: kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64 Marking kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm as an update to kernel-devel-3.11.10-100.fc18.x86_64 Marking kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm as an update to kernel-devel-3.13.6-200.fc20.x86_64 Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package kernel-devel.x86_64 0:3.14.2-200.fc20 will be installed -- Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved Package Arch Version RepositorySize Installing: kernel-devel x86_64 3.14.2-200.fc20 /kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc 20.x86_64 33 M Transaction Summary Install 1 Package Total size: 33 M Installed size: 33 M Downloading packages: Running transaction check Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded Running transaction Installing : kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64 Error unpacking rpm package kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64 error: unpacking of archive failed: cpio: mkdir Verifying : kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64 Failed: kernel-devel.x86_64 0:3.14.2-200.fc20 Complete! # Here are the sums of the file: # md5sum kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm 0d6418857d2c6ba112077a102d41d89e kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm # sha512sum kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm 39ccd42b2ff94e941dd75071004dc73011e98c8b092290f84d5c861c6b1614c1ca7c4d0fea3e13fd155f91bb2d6f2b47bc53c5c909f27aff607f54746acd 77be kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: bitcoin miner
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 12:38:23PM -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote: On 05/02/2014 12:14 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: You are better off buying bitcoin than mining it right now. Last I checked it's down in the $450s (from last year's bubble of above $1,500) I don't plan on doing any full-scale mining, I just wanted to see the process.. At least I have bitcoin installed, have my own wallet and a miner installed. Yeah, I know it crashed, but I was just curious to see how it works.. Try this repo: http://linux.ringingliberty.com/bitcoin/ This is the only reliable prepackaged bitcoin repo I found for Fedora. There was talk to include his packages into Fedora repos, but I believe there was some conflict. There is a bugzilla report. Okay, found it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292 Hope this helps, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: bitcoin miner
On 05/02/2014 02:23 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: Try this repo: http://linux.ringingliberty.com/bitcoin/ This is the only reliable prepackaged bitcoin repo I found for Fedora. There was talk to include his packages into Fedora repos, but I believe there was some conflict. There is a bugzilla report. Okay, found it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292 Hope this helps, thanks, that's exactly what I used to do my install. bitcoin-qt is installed and working. -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
system-config-services
Hello, When I reun system-config-services, I get ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on :1.980:/org/fedoraproject/Config/Services/ServiceHerders/XinetdServiceHerder: dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. I checked: systemctl status dbus.service systemctl status dbus.socket But there are active. What is wrong? Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Trouble starting webex in F20
On 05/02/2014 01:19 PM, Chris Kottaridis wrote: On 05/02/2014 12:07 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: On 05/01/2014 06:26 PM, Chris Kottaridis wrote: On 05/01/2014 05:08 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 05/01/2014 01:40 PM, Andrew Azores issued this missive: On 05/01/2014 04:27 PM, Chris Kottaridis wrote: On 05/01/2014 02:11 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote: * Chris Kottaridis chris...@quietwind.net [2014-05-01 13:25]: I have an F19 and an F20 host and when I try to start a webex on the F20 host it doesn't work right. It works fine on the F19 machine. The symptom is that when I start the webex in F20 it sends up a message about wanting to run an applet and I tell it yes it's OK to run the applet. That doesn't come up on the F19 host. On the F19 the icedtea icon pops up for a short time and then I get connected. I don't see the icedtea icon pop up in F20. I did notice that icedtea is at 1.5 in F20, but at 1.4 for F19 and there is some policy control added in 1.5. I set the policy to allow all applets to do everything for the time being in the .config/icedtea-web/security/java.policy file which the icedtea-web man page says is the default policy file. Any ideas on what the difference might be between F19 and F20 would be appreciated or pointer to a different group that could help. Sorry that I only have rather high level usage info, but so far other then this issue with starting a webex everything seems OK that I have tried so far. Hi Chris, Is it possible for us to reproduce this? If so, what are the steps? You'd need a webex account. Hmm, there's no way to reproduce it with the test meeting [0] ? After some more playing it seems the issue is when I try to share my desktop it doesn't get shared in F20, but does in F19. So the Webex applet is successfully starting with both, then? That is what's so weird is it works like a champ in F19. I assume there is just something missing, maybe something I need to install or some permission or configuration setting. I haven't found anything in any log files yet to help point to what the problem might be. When I connect to webex to start a session if I click on Activities I see a webex icon of a ball that is half green and half blue and the name is sun-applet-PluginMain on the activites list. After I click on share desktop I see a second icon like that which says Atasjni on the F19, but still only have the one on F20. So, it seems some app is having trouble getting started when I click to share desktop. So, far I haven't found any complaint in any log file though. Thanks Chris Kottaridis Do you have any log files at all to share? You can also try launching your browser from terminal (assuming this is starting through a browser at all), and capture the output with a redirect or tee there. Also, just a note that IcedTea-Web 1.5 is available for Fedora 19 as well. Although if you appear to be having problems after the 1.5 update, I wouldn't recommend you update to it yet - not until we figure out what's going on here! With 1.5 on both Fedora 19 (native) and 20 (VM), Webex works fine, but I haven't tried this 'share desktop' functionality. [0] http://www.webex.com/test-meeting.html Also check to see if there's perhaps a SELinux alert going along with this. There may be changes to selinux configs that block sharing the desktop. I don't know a lot about selinux, but I used the SELinux management tool to just disable SELinux. So, I assume SELinux is out of the picture for now. But, I think it is probably some local configuration issue like that. Thanks Chris Kottaridis -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART? - -- Putting SELinux into permissive mode, would have been plenty. Setting the machine to disabled will only take place on the next reboot. If SELinux is blocking the web browser from sharing desktop you could turn off one of these booleans, which would probably fix your problem. unconfined_chrome_sandbox_transition -- on unconfined_mozilla_plugin_transition -- on setsebool -P unconfined_chrome_sandbox_transition 0 setsebool -P unconfined_mozilla_plugin_transition 0 You would need to restart the browser. I have rebooted many times after disabling SELinux, it was getting in the way of other issues and so for the time being I just want to get it out of the way. Thanks for the pointers though. Once I get things right I'll re-enable it and make sure to make the changes you recommend. Thanks Chris Kottaridis If it causes you any problems, please open a bug report or reach out to the
Re: system-config-services
On 05/03/14 02:42, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, When I reun system-config-services, I get ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on :1.980:/org/fedoraproject/Config/Services/ServiceHerders/XinetdServiceHerder: dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. I checked: systemctl status dbus.service systemctl status dbus.socket But there are active. What is wrong? Well, you checked themthey are active but there are errors... systemctl status dbus.service dbus.service - D-Bus System Message Bus Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/dbus.service; static) Active: active (running) since Thu 2014-05-01 18:30:32 CEST; 6h ago Main PID: 965 (dbus-daemon) CGroup: /system.slice/dbus.service ├─ 965 /bin/dbus-daemon --system --address=systemd: --nofork --nopidfile --systemd-activation ├─4753 /usr/bin/python /usr/share/system-config-services/system-config-services-mechanism.py └─4755 /usr/libexec/gam_server May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: follow_name_owner_changes=follow_name_owner_changes) May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/proxies.py, line 248, in __init__ May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: self._named_service = conn.activate_name_owner(bus_name) May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/bus.py, line 175, in activate_..._owner May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: return self.get_name_owner(bus_name) May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/bus.py, line 361, in get_name_owner May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: 's', (bus_name,), **keywords) May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/connection.py, line 651, in ca...ocking May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: message, timeout) May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a replyroken. Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full. You'll need to investigate that -- Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong. -- Dandemis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
yum update
Hello, When I update fedora 20, I get a glitch with some packages of fedora 21! Should I remove rpmfusion-free-rawhide? Packages skipped because of dependency problems: ffmpeg-libs-2.2.1-1.fc21.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free-rawhide x264-libs-0.142-4.20140423gite260ea5.fc21.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free-rawhide I also had to remove vlc! Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: yum update
On Fri, 02 May 2014 23:00:41 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, When I update fedora 20, I get a glitch with some packages of fedora 21! Should I remove rpmfusion-free-rawhide? It's not for Fedora 20, so decide yourself. You've been on these mailing-lists for many years, so you should know that Rawhide refers to the development of the next version of the distribution - Fedora 21. That's also why the packages contain .fc21 in their file names. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide Packages skipped because of dependency problems: ffmpeg-libs-2.2.1-1.fc21.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free-rawhide x264-libs-0.142-4.20140423gite260ea5.fc21.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free-rawhide I also had to remove vlc! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: packages
On Fri, 02 May 2014 13:49:39 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, I made the following packages because they either do not existed or because they were wrong. I can donate them to the community if it make sense. Depending on how much interest you would develop for real packaging, you might want to read up on Fedora Copr. Packages in the Fedora package collection need maintainers. They cannot be donated as prebuilt packages. The last that would need to happen is to make available the src.rpm files, and then somebody with interest might adapt them and enter them into the review queue. There are running fine, however, 1 or 2 may require to be installed with rpm and the --nodeps option. This is not clear why, because the packages are already installed! Mistakes in the packages. Likely bad/incorrect automatic dependencies or lack of filtering of dependencies. Requirement to use --nodeps is a show-stopper. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Yum fails to install kernel-devel
On Fri, 2 May 2014 10:52:56 -0700, Luke Nath wrote: yum -y update updated more than 11500 packages, because I had not run updates for quite a while. A direct upgrade from F18 to F20? Marking kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm as an update to kernel-devel-3.11.10-100.fc18.x86_64 Marking kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm as an update to kernel-devel-3.13.6-200.fc20.x86_64 Error unpacking rpm package kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64 error: unpacking of archive failed: cpio: mkdir Verifying : kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64 Since you're looking for a work-around, have you tried removing the installed kernel-devel package and installing the new one afterwards? It could be that you don't even need the files within it. In case there are dependencies, plain old rpm knows how to deal with such a case. Here are the sums of the file: # md5sum kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm 0d6418857d2c6ba112077a102d41d89e kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm # sha512sum kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm 39ccd42b2ff94e941dd75071004dc73011e98c8b092290f84d5c861c6b1614c1ca7c4d0fea3e13fd155f91bb2d6f2b47bc53c5c909f27aff607f54746acd 77be kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm If you want to verify packages, run rpm -Kv … on the file. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: system-config-services
Hello, I am lost again!!! I cannot open the port: 5900/tcp closed vnc 5901/tcp closed vnc-1 5902/tcp closed vnc-2 5903/tcp closed vnc-3 or from localhost: 5900/tcp closed vnc 5901/tcp filtered vnc-1 5902/tcp closed vnc-2 5903/tcp closed vnc-3 while Using firewall-config, I check vncserver bot permanent and runtime, Do I need to do something else? systemctl status vncserver vncserver.service Loaded: not-found (Reason: No such file or directory) Active: inactive (dead) systemctl start vncserver Failed to issue method call: Unit vncserver.service failed to load: No such file or directory. one the server, I did vncserver and open :1 Both machines are on the same network vncviewer fails error 111 (unable to connect to socket) remmina-vnc fails too (it ass the ssh password and sleep!) It looks like to that I am not able to reopen this port, while it has works! I am missing one point: Both dbus.service and .socket are active without error Sorry for my incompetence! On 05/03/14 02:42, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, When I reun system-config-services, I get ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on :1.980:/org/fedoraproject/Config/Services/ServiceHerders/XinetdServiceHerder: dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. I checked: systemctl status dbus.service systemctl status dbus.socket But there are active. What is wrong? Well, you checked themthey are active but there are errors... systemctl status dbus.service dbus.service - D-Bus System Message Bus Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/dbus.service; static) Active: active (running) since Thu 2014-05-01 18:30:32 CEST; 6h ago Main PID: 965 (dbus-daemon) CGroup: /system.slice/dbus.service ├─ 965 /bin/dbus-daemon --system --address=systemd: --nofork --nopidfile --systemd-activation ├─4753 /usr/bin/python /usr/share/system-config-services/system-config-services-mechanism.py └─4755 /usr/libexec/gam_server May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: follow_name_owner_changes=follow_name_owner_changes) May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/proxies.py, line 248, in __init__ May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: self._named_service = conn.activate_name_owner(bus_name) May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/bus.py, line 175, in activate_..._owner May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: return self.get_name_owner(bus_name) May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/bus.py, line 361, in get_name_owner May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: 's', (bus_name,), **keywords) May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/connection.py, line 651, in ca...ocking May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: message, timeout) May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a replyroken. Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full. You'll need to investigate that -- Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong. -- Dandemis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: system-config-services
Sorry, I found the issue: iptables -I INPUT 1 -p tcp --dport 5901 -j ACCEPT ces Hello, I am lost again!!! I cannot open the port: 5900/tcp closed vnc 5901/tcp closed vnc-1 5902/tcp closed vnc-2 5903/tcp closed vnc-3 or from localhost: 5900/tcp closed vnc 5901/tcp filtered vnc-1 5902/tcp closed vnc-2 5903/tcp closed vnc-3 while Using firewall-config, I check vncserver bot permanent and runtime, Do I need to do something else? systemctl status vncserver vncserver.service Loaded: not-found (Reason: No such file or directory) Active: inactive (dead) systemctl start vncserver Failed to issue method call: Unit vncserver.service failed to load: No such file or directory. one the server, I did vncserver and open :1 Both machines are on the same network vncviewer fails error 111 (unable to connect to socket) remmina-vnc fails too (it ass the ssh password and sleep!) It looks like to that I am not able to reopen this port, while it has works! I am missing one point: Both dbus.service and .socket are active without error Sorry for my incompetence! On 05/03/14 02:42, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, When I reun system-config-services, I get ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on :1.980:/org/fedoraproject/Config/Services/ServiceHerders/XinetdServiceHerder: dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. I checked: systemctl status dbus.service systemctl status dbus.socket But there are active. What is wrong? Well, you checked themthey are active but there are errors... systemctl status dbus.service dbus.service - D-Bus System Message Bus Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/dbus.service; static) Active: active (running) since Thu 2014-05-01 18:30:32 CEST; 6h ago Main PID: 965 (dbus-daemon) CGroup: /system.slice/dbus.service ├─ 965 /bin/dbus-daemon --system --address=systemd: --nofork --nopidfile --systemd-activation ├─4753 /usr/bin/python /usr/share/system-config-services/system-config-services-mechanism.py └─4755 /usr/libexec/gam_server May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: follow_name_owner_changes=follow_name_owner_changes) May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/proxies.py, line 248, in __init__ May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: self._named_service = conn.activate_name_owner(bus_name) May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/bus.py, line 175, in activate_..._owner May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: return self.get_name_owner(bus_name) May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/bus.py, line 361, in get_name_owner May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: 's', (bus_name,), **keywords) May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/connection.py, line 651, in ca...ocking May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: message, timeout) May 02 01:24:44 Homere dbus-daemon[965]: DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a replyroken. Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full. You'll need to investigate that -- Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong. -- Dandemis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org === Patrick DUPRÉ
Re: remmina
On 05/02/14 19:14, Patrick Dupre wrote: I was trying to terminate (logout or close) a remmina-vnc session, not just disconnect! When I reconnect, I wish to start a brand new session. The only way to do that is to restart the vncserver on host prior to connecting -- Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong. -- Dandemis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
RE: Yum fails to install kernel-devel
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 23:45:40 +0200 From: mschwe...@gmail.com To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Yum fails to install kernel-devel On Fri, 2 May 2014 10:52:56 -0700, Luke Nath wrote: yum -y update updated more than 11500 packages, because I had not run updates for quite a while. A direct upgrade from F18 to F20? some time ago, I ran fedup to fc20 and it worked perfectly. I booted into fc20 and I had no serious problems. I have been without internet for many weeks. I used a hotspot to finally run yum update, and it worked fine, ecept for the glitch of installing kernel-devel Marking kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm as an update to kernel-devel-3.11.10-100.fc18.x86_64 Marking kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm as an update to kernel-devel-3.13.6-200.fc20.x86_64 Error unpacking rpm package kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64 error: unpacking of archive failed: cpio: mkdir Verifying : kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64 Since you're looking for a work-around, have you tried removing the installed kernel-devel package and installing the new one afterwards? It could be that you don't even need the files within it. In case there are dependencies, plain old rpm knows how to deal with such a case. Thanks for the suggestion. I will indeed try it. I have been under the impression that the package may be corrupted. Here are the sums of the file: # md5sum kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm 0d6418857d2c6ba112077a102d41d89e kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm # sha512sum kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm 39ccd42b2ff94e941dd75071004dc73011e98c8b092290f84d5c861c6b1614c1ca7c4d0fea3e13fd155f91bb2d6f2b47bc53c5c909f27aff607f54746acd 77be kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm If you want to verify packages, run rpm -Kv … on the file. Thanx again for the tips. ] -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
