Re: Unable to hibernate fc20 system
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 21:14 -0700, Luke Nath wrote: > On fc20 with mate desktop. > > Clicking System -> Shutdown > > does not show the option to hibernate. > > Am I missing a package? Is this a mate problem?? > "Alt" please! C.S. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Unable to hibernate fc20 system
On fc20 with mate desktop. Clicking System -> Shutdown does not show the option to hibernate. Am I missing a package? Is this a mate problem?? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How I got Firefox 29 to not be slow.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 12:07:54PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: >> >> This seems to be epidemic in browsers. If you use chrome for a while >> you'll see it there too. > > I've had similar experiences. Having 50 or more open tabs in several tab > groups. > When you look at the ps output next time notices FFs memory usage. I noticed > it tends to use more and more memory over time and a a certain point it just > becomes slow. Therefor I just quit FF overy couple of days and restart it. > I suspect this is due to badly written javascript on pages that just gobbles up resources. In chrome I press SHIFT-ESC to get the task manager open. Sometimes I find a tab that is using way too much CPU and or memory and I can kill it. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
thoughts on using Fedora for Dell Mobile Precision 3800 laptop
Hi, I am considering buying the Dell Mobile Precision M3800 (with QHD+ 3200×1800 resolution) for use with Fedora 20 and later. Any thoughts/experiences with it? (I am excited about the resolution aspect.) http://www.dell.com/us/business/p/precision-m3800-workstation/fs It appears to have a touchscreen (not sure if that is an option only) but is there any use for a touchscreen on Fedora? Sorry if this is a naive question, but I have never considered using a touchscreen device previously. Many thanks for any input! Ranjan -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses. FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and family! Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: LibreOffice envelope bug?
-Original Message- From: Ed Greshko Reply-to: Community support for Fedora users To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: Re: LibreOffice envelope bug? Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 08:01:07 +0800 On 06/06/14 07:17, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote: > Trying to use LibreOffice to compose and print #6 3/4 envelopes. > > Insert -> Envelope -> Format tab -> Size #6 3/4 (Personal) Envelope -> Insert > > File -> Print preview shows a Size #8 (Monarch) Envelope format, which is the > menu selection just above #6 3/4 (Personal) Envelope in the Format tab list. > > Is this a known bug? Is there a work-around? You mean "File -> Page Preview" right? I just tried it and I could not reproduce the problem. -- Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong. -- Dandemis No. File -> Print... displays a page preview and some final formatting choices before actually sending the job to the printer. I just found what appears to be a recent report of this bug on the LibreOffice site: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77149 --Doc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: LibreOffice envelope bug?
On 06/06/14 07:17, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote: > Trying to use LibreOffice to compose and print #6 3/4 envelopes. > > Insert -> Envelope -> Format tab -> Size #6 3/4 (Personal) Envelope -> Insert > > File -> Print preview shows a Size #8 (Monarch) Envelope format, which is the > menu selection just above #6 3/4 (Personal) Envelope in the Format tab list. > > Is this a known bug? Is there a work-around? You mean "File -> Page Preview" right? I just tried it and I could not reproduce the problem. -- Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong. -- Dandemis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
LibreOffice envelope bug?
Trying to use LibreOffice to compose and print #6 3/4 envelopes. Insert -> Envelope -> Format tab -> Size #6 3/4 (Personal) Envelope -> Insert File -> Print preview shows a Size #8 (Monarch) Envelope format, which is the menu selection just above #6 3/4 (Personal) Envelope in the Format tab list. Is this a known bug? Is there a work-around? --Doc Savage Fairview Heights, IL -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Multiplying Dbus-daemons forcing restart
Hi Folks, I'm currently running 3.13.11-100.fc19.x86_64 and have had a problem with dbus-daemons running amok on this system and even on a few earlier fedora revs. If I do 'ps -ef' I get pages of walker 24457 1 0 15:11 ?00:00:00 /bin/dbus-daemon --fork --print-pid 5 --print-a walker 24475 1 0 15:11 ?00:00:00 /bin/dbus-daemon --fork --print-pid 5 --print-a walker 24493 1 0 15:11 ?00:00:00 /bin/dbus-daemon --fork --print-pid 5 --print-a walker 24511 1 0 15:11 ?00:00:00 /bin/dbus-daemon --fork --print-pid 5 --print-a walker 24529 1 0 15:11 ?00:00:00 /bin/dbus-daemon --fork --print-pid 5 --print-a walker 24547 1 0 15:12 ?00:00:00 /bin/dbus-daemon --fork --print-pid 5 --print-a walker 24565 1 0 15:13 ?00:00:00 /bin/dbus-daemon --fork --print-pid 5 --print-a walker 24583 1 0 15:13 ?00:00:00 /bin/dbus-daemon --fork --print-pid 5 --print-a ... 10) uptime 15:21:16 up 2 days, 15:15, 13 users, load average: 0.46, 0.48, 0.49 11) ps -ef | grep dbus-daemon | wc 1031434 11738 So, in two days, I've accumulated 103 of these things. Oh, and if I do a 'killall dbus-daemon' it locks up my desktop. I've searched and this seems to have happened to lots of people going back even into 2012 or so, but I never have seen any definitive fix. I'm long past hoping that "the next update" will fix this problem. Eventually, things like firefox and exmh will fail with "can't open any more file descriptors", "no more processes available". Then I have to just power cycle and start the inflationary cycle all over again. I'm ready to ditch gnome, ditch kde, ditch plasma, or whatever just to get a system that will stably stay up for more than a week or so. Before this happened I could run for a year or more with no problem. Any suggestions? -- Rick Walker -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Where does FC20 NM store wifi config files?
On 06/06/14 00:16, Luke Nath wrote: > Is there a way for the user/owner to actually look at those keys without > having > to bring up the network? If the keys in in the gnome keyring, I suppose it is > in > some file in my home dir. How do I "view" (i.e. decrypt and view) the > contents of that file? I've not had the need to look directly into the file maintained by either gnome key ring or kde's wallet. So, I don't know the answer to your question. -- Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong. -- Dandemis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How I got Firefox 29 to not be slow.
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 12:07:54PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 09:59:08 -0600 > linux guy wrote: > > > I ran a "ps aux | > > grep firefox" only to find a ghost firefox instance still running. I > > killed it. > > This seems to be epidemic in browsers. If you use chrome for a while > you'll see it there too. I've had similar experiences. Having 50 or more open tabs in several tab groups. When you look at the ps output next time notices FFs memory usage. I noticed it tends to use more and more memory over time and a a certain point it just becomes slow. Therefor I just quit FF overy couple of days and restart it. -Marcel -- == Marcel J.E. MolMESA Consulting B.V. ===-ph. +31-(0)6-54724868 P.O. Box 112 ===-mar...@mesa.nl 2630 AC Nootdorp __ www.mesa.nl ---U_n_i_x__I_n_t_e_r_n_e_t The Netherlands They couldn't think of a number, Linux user 1148 -- counter.li.org so they gave me a name! -- Rupert Hine -- www.ruperthine.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
GTK Theme Engine not Found Error
Hi, I have just installed Adobe Acrobat Reader 9.5.5 on Fedora 20 from the rpm provided by Adobe but it won't run. Can anyone tell me what the following warning it produces when run from a shell? (acroread:4395): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "ia_ora" After producing this warning acrobat produces a "File read error" dialog and doesn't run. I am running kde and the "ia_ora" component of the above message I assume is because I am using the "ia_ora_smooth" gtk widget set, and, I have the /usr/lib64 theme engine path that all the kde themes are installed into in the path list in path list in the widget path configuration. Just as a slight side issue to this does anyone have any experience with Eclipse 4.3.2 and windowbuilder, I have an issue at the moment that when I click on a widget I want to add to the gui design, or try and select a property on an existing widget in the design, I get a dialog complaining of an acrobat read error displayed twice. The issue only occurs the first time I try this in an eclipse session. I was getting this issue with acrobat 9.5.1 and uninstalling that version and installing 9.5.5 does not rectify the issue. Any help on these issues would be much appreciated. regards, Steve <>-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OpenSSL package updates coming shortly to mirrors
On 05/06/14 21:57, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 21:26:42 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote: Oh, I have both x86_64 and i686 version of openssl-libs installed and the i686 version is not in koji. Of course it is! Paul has mentioned that then you need to drop the "--arch=x86_64" option from the koji download command. Yes, I saw that but since openssl-libs is the only i686 version I had expected it to come with arch=x86_64 build. I am not familiar at all with the koji stuff. -- Erik -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Run multiple desktop environment on the same system without messing up each other
On Thursday, June 05, 2014 03:25:22 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:29:45PM +0630, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > > I was wondering if their is a way to have multiple desktop environment on > > a > > system without one messing with other. Anytime you have multiple desktop > > environment on a system they will start writing each others configuration > > files messing up with themes. Not to mention populated application menus. > > I don't think that these problems are generally the case. Are you saying > that you don't want to see some applications that are installed on the > system on the menu of some desktop environments because they're written for > a certain toolkit? (That is, no Gnome-targetted apps available in KDE?) Why > limit yourself like that? > > > Would it be possible to create different users for different desktop > > environment? Or something like that. > > Sure. You could do that. Previously whenever I have tried to run multiple desktop environment themes would get messed up like Chrome may pickup one theme and not the other and things like that. Let me give it another go and see if it works fine. -- Sudhir Khanger http://sudhirkhanger.com/ https://github.com/donniezazen -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Run multiple desktop environment on the same system without messing up each other
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 23:29 +0630, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering if their is a way to have multiple desktop environment on a > system without one messing with other. Anytime you have multiple desktop > environment on a system they will start writing each others configuration > files messing up with themes. Not to mention populated application menus. > > Would it be possible to create different users for different desktop > environment? Or something like that. Of course. I do it all the time. I also occasionally log into a different environment than my default one just to see what it looks like. DEs don't generally step on each other's toes even though in theory they can. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OpenSSL package updates coming shortly to mirrors
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 21:26:42 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > Oh, I have both x86_64 and i686 version of openssl-libs installed and the > i686 > version is not in koji. Of course it is! Paul has mentioned that then you need to drop the "--arch=x86_64" option from the koji download command. -- Also visit the web interface: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=521383 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OpenSSL package updates coming shortly to mirrors
On 05/06/14 20:32, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 20:28:18 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote: For Fedora 20 x86_64: yum -y install koji koji download-build --arch=x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-38.fc20 yum localupdate openssl*-1.0.1e-38.fc20.x86_64.rpm Also, keep in mind that if you have multilib packages installed, you may need to omit the --arch options above and do something like `yum localupdate openssl*rpm` instead to grab and update the additional packages. Isn't openssl-libs missing? No. It is part of the koji "build". $ koji download-build --arch=x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-38.fc20 openssl-perl-1.0.1e-38.fc20.x86_64.rpm | 106 kB 00:00 !!! openssl-libs-1.0.1e-38.fc20.x86_64.rpm | 1.8 MB 00:01 !!! openssl-devel-1.0.1e-38.fc20.x86_64.rpm | 2.3 MB 00:01 !!! openssl-static-1.0.1e-38.fc20.x86_64.rpm| 1.9 MB 00:00 !!! openssl-1.0.1e-38.fc20.x86_64.rpm | 1.4 MB 00:01 !!! Oh, I have both x86_64 and i686 version of openssl-libs installed and the i686 version is not in koji. -- Erik -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: FLASH: Internet Storm Center Briefing on Today's OpenSSL Security Patches
On 05.06.2014, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6881/gnutls-3.1.20-5.fc19 Is the patch backported to that version? The bug is fixed in 3.1.25, but not in 3.1.20. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Run multiple desktop environment on the same system without messing up each other
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:29:45PM +0630, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > I was wondering if their is a way to have multiple desktop environment on a > system without one messing with other. Anytime you have multiple desktop > environment on a system they will start writing each others configuration > files messing up with themes. Not to mention populated application menus. I don't think that these problems are generally the case. Are you saying that you don't want to see some applications that are installed on the system on the menu of some desktop environments because they're written for a certain toolkit? (That is, no Gnome-targetted apps available in KDE?) Why limit yourself like that? > Would it be possible to create different users for different desktop > environment? Or something like that. Sure. You could do that. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fwd: FLASH: Internet Storm Center Briefing on Today's OpenSSL Security Patches
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:00:50PM +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote: > On 05.06.2014, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > Fedora has an update that should be rolling out soon. > > And while we are waiting: > http://tinyurl.com/o3glbta Updates for that issue (CVE-2014-3466) have been available for some time, I believe -- for example, gnutls-3.1.25-1.fc20. -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: FLASH: Internet Storm Center Briefing on Today's OpenSSL Security Patches
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 21:00:50 +0200 Heinz Diehl wrote: > On 05.06.2014, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > Fedora has an update that should be rolling out soon. > > And while we are waiting: > http://tinyurl.com/o3glbta Thats talking about the gnutls bug a few days ago. That update is already in fedora stable updates: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6891/gnutls-3.1.25-1.fc20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6881/gnutls-3.1.20-5.fc19 kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fwd: FLASH: Internet Storm Center Briefing on Today's OpenSSL Security Patches
On 05.06.2014, Matthew Miller wrote: > Fedora has an update that should be rolling out soon. And while we are waiting: http://tinyurl.com/o3glbta -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OpenSSL package updates coming shortly to mirrors
>> yum -y install koji >> koji download-build --arch=x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-38.fc20 > > yum localupdate openssl*-1.0.1e-38.fc20.x86_64.rpm A while ago someone posted this method which seems to work well enough and takes care of the dependencies without installing needless *-dev options. Basically you need to create the koji repo file and then use yum to download the needed rpms automatically. /etc/yum.repos.d/koji.repo: [koji] name=Koji Repo baseurl=http://koji.fedoraproject.org/repos/f$releasever-build/latest/$basearch/ enabled=0 skip_if_unavailable=1 gpgcheck=0 and then run: yum install openssl --enablerepo=updates-testing,koji -wolfgang -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OpenSSL package updates coming shortly to mirrors
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 20:28:18 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > >> For Fedora 20 x86_64: > >> > >> yum -y install koji > >> koji download-build --arch=x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-38.fc20 > > > >yum localupdate openssl*-1.0.1e-38.fc20.x86_64.rpm > > > > > > Also, keep in mind that if you have multilib packages installed, you > > may need to omit the --arch options above and do something like `yum > > localupdate openssl*rpm` instead to grab and update the additional > > packages. > > > Isn't openssl-libs missing? No. It is part of the koji "build". $ koji download-build --arch=x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-38.fc20 openssl-perl-1.0.1e-38.fc20.x86_64.rpm | 106 kB 00:00 !!! openssl-libs-1.0.1e-38.fc20.x86_64.rpm | 1.8 MB 00:01 !!! openssl-devel-1.0.1e-38.fc20.x86_64.rpm | 2.3 MB 00:01 !!! openssl-static-1.0.1e-38.fc20.x86_64.rpm| 1.9 MB 00:00 !!! openssl-1.0.1e-38.fc20.x86_64.rpm | 1.4 MB 00:01 !!! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OpenSSL package updates coming shortly to mirrors
On 05/06/14 19:38, Paul W. Frields wrote: On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:28:51PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: Hi, if you weren't aware, there is an announcement about an OpenSSL security issue on the Fedora announce list. Here's the post: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2014-June/003216.html The updates referenced in the announcement are still in the process of being pushed out to mirrors. However, you can pull the updates directly from Fedora's koji instance if you don't want to wait: Corrections to make this a little easier: For Fedora 19 x86_64: yum -y install koji koji download-build --arch=x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-38.fc19 yum localupdate openssl*-1.0.1e-38.fc19.x86_64.rpm For Fedora 20 x86_64: yum -y install koji koji download-build --arch=x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-38.fc20 yum localupdate openssl*-1.0.1e-38.fc20.x86_64.rpm Also, keep in mind that if you have multilib packages installed, you may need to omit the --arch options above and do something like `yum localupdate openssl*rpm` instead to grab and update the additional packages. Isn't openssl-libs missing? -- Erik. -- Erik -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Run multiple desktop environment on the same system without messing up each other
Hello, I was wondering if their is a way to have multiple desktop environment on a system without one messing with other. Anytime you have multiple desktop environment on a system they will start writing each others configuration files messing up with themes. Not to mention populated application menus. Would it be possible to create different users for different desktop environment? Or something like that. -- Sudhir Khanger http://sudhirkhanger.com/ https://github.com/donniezazen -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How I got Firefox 29 to not be slow.
On 5 June 2014 19:46, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > At least a little while ago, chrome was even worse when many tabs were > open, IIRC because it consumed a huge number of threads. Not sure if > that issue has been fixed recently, though. Chrome runs tabs in _processes_ not threads, AIUI. -- Liam Proven * Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk * GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven MSN: lpro...@hotmail.com * Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven Cell: +44 7939-087884 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How I got Firefox 29 to not be slow.
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 12:07 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 09:59:08 -0600 > linux guy wrote: > > > I ran a "ps aux | > > grep firefox" only to find a ghost firefox instance still running. I > > killed it. > > This seems to be epidemic in browsers. If you use chrome for a while > you'll see it there too. > At least a little while ago, chrome was even worse when many tabs were open, IIRC because it consumed a huge number of threads. Not sure if that issue has been fixed recently, though. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OpenSSL package updates coming shortly to mirrors
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:28:51PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > Hi, if you weren't aware, there is an announcement about an OpenSSL > security issue on the Fedora announce list. Here's the post: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2014-June/003216.html > > The updates referenced in the announcement are still in the process of > being pushed out to mirrors. However, you can pull the updates > directly from Fedora's koji instance if you don't want to wait: Corrections to make this a little easier: > For Fedora 19 x86_64: > > yum -y install koji > koji download-build --arch=x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-38.fc19 yum localupdate openssl*-1.0.1e-38.fc19.x86_64.rpm > For Fedora 20 x86_64: > > yum -y install koji > koji download-build --arch=x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-38.fc20 yum localupdate openssl*-1.0.1e-38.fc20.x86_64.rpm Also, keep in mind that if you have multilib packages installed, you may need to omit the --arch options above and do something like `yum localupdate openssl*rpm` instead to grab and update the additional packages. -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
OpenSSL package updates coming shortly to mirrors
Hi, if you weren't aware, there is an announcement about an OpenSSL security issue on the Fedora announce list. Here's the post: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2014-June/003216.html The updates referenced in the announcement are still in the process of being pushed out to mirrors. However, you can pull the updates directly from Fedora's koji instance if you don't want to wait: For Fedora 19 x86_64: yum -y install koji koji download-build --arch=x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-38.fc19 yum localinstall openssl-1.0.1e-38.fc19.x86_64.rpm For Fedora 20 x86_64: yum -y install koji koji download-build --arch=x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-38.fc20 yum localinstall openssl-1.0.1e-38.fc20.x86_64.rpm -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Hibernate
Hi All, Will FC20 have a hibernate option for shutdown? Thanx. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
RE: Where does FC20 NM store wifi config files?
> From: ed.gres...@greshko.com > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 05:41:11 +0800 > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Where does FC20 NM store wifi config files? > > On 06/05/14 05:36, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 06/05/14 01:54, Luke Nath wrote: > >> thanks for any tips or directory pathname where these config files are > >> stored. > > They are stored in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts > >> Also, I read a web page: > >> http://news.softpedia.com/news/All-Linux-Distributions-Store-Wi-Fi-Passwords-in-Plain-Text-If-You-Don-t-Use-Encryption-412387.shtml > >> > >> That the wifi passwords are not stored by NM in encrypted form. > > I use KDE. So, my passwords for wifi are stored in encrypted format in the > > my "KDE wallet". > > > > Oh, and I believe GNOME keeps the passwords in the "GNOME keyring". > > -- Thank you. Is there a way for the user/owner to actually look at those keys without having to bring up the network? If the keys in in the gnome keyring, I suppose it is in some file in my home dir. How do I "view" (i.e. decrypt and view) the contents of that file? Thanx a lot. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How I got Firefox 29 to not be slow.
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 09:59:08 -0600 linux guy wrote: > I ran a "ps aux | > grep firefox" only to find a ghost firefox instance still running. I > killed it. This seems to be epidemic in browsers. If you use chrome for a while you'll see it there too. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
How I got Firefox 29 to not be slow.
Hi people. I realize this isn't a Fedora issue per se but I thought that being a number of people running Fedora use FF, I'd share my experience here. I use FF as my main browser. My apologies to the Konqueror developers. I do a lot of online research and it isn't uncommon for me to have 10 FF instances running with over 50 webpages (tabs) open in total. Lately FF has been very slow. Probably since FF27, though at first I didn't pay much attention. Lately its been a huge annoyance. I tried everything to speed it up. Disabling disk caching, selectively disabling various flash options, changing the graphics backends, etc. All to no avail. Today I happened to stumble upon the solution to the problem. Out of frustration I installed Chrome and began to use it. In doing so I completely closed all the FF instances I had open. I've done this before, but for whatever reason, this time was different. I was using Chrome, doing some light browsing when I accidentally started a FF instance. When I did, I received a message stating that there was already a FF instance running. I aborted the startup. I ran a "ps aux | grep firefox" only to find a ghost firefox instance still running. I killed it. I then restarted FF, only to find that it is now peppy once again. I hope this helps someone. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora-like Linux for 1.99GB RAM?
http://blog.woralelandia.com/2013/09/25/howto-install-fedora-19-on-old-low-on-memory-machines/ Just add nomemcheck arg when you boot the livecd and give it a try. I ended up enabling swap first and it worked fine. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fwd: FLASH: Internet Storm Center Briefing on Today's OpenSSL Security Patches
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:51:09AM -0500, Steven Stern wrote: > OpenSSL today released an critical update, patching 6 different > vulnerabilities, one of which can lead to remote code execution. After Fedora has an update that should be rolling out soon. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
no minimized icons
> Michael Schwendt mschwendt at gmail.com > Tue Jun 3 17:18:22 UTC 2014 > > * Previous message: no minimized icons > * Next message: no minimized icons > * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] > [ author ] > > __ > On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 09:07:53 -0700, Randolph Jones wrote: > > > I am running fc14. gnome 2.32.0 > > recently desktop behaviour changed > > Fedora 14 has reached end-of-life more than 400 days ago, which means > there haven't been any updates since then: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life > > Can you reproduce the issue with a fresh user account? > No. new user puts icons on lower tool bar when program is minimized -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Fwd: FLASH: Internet Storm Center Briefing on Today's OpenSSL Security Patches
FYI Original Message Subject: FLASH: Internet Storm Center Briefing on Today's OpenSSL Security Patches Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 14:37:10 + From: SANS Institute Reply-To: s...@sans.org FLASH: Internet Storm Center Briefing on Today's OpenSSL Security Patches Today, Thursday, June 05 at 12:00 PM EDT (16:00:00 UTC) OpenSSL today released an critical update, patching 6 different vulnerabilities, one of which can lead to remote code execution. After heartbleed, system administrators are rightfully nervous about any new OpenSSL issues. In this webcast, we will discuss the impact of the vulnerabilities patched today, how to find out if you are vulnerable and which systems to patch first. Register here: https://www.sans.org/webcasts/98445 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: A word to the wise regarding failed fedup upgrades
On Thursday 05 June 2014 14:41:57 Trever L. Adams wrote: > Wow. If you are missing glibc, I am not sure I can help you. You need to > find a static mount command and cp (possibly on rescue images). If you > can do that, just suck the glibc stuff onto a flash drive with those and > move them over. From there, you should be able to start rebuilding. > > Otherwise, you are correct, likely just better to copy data and > configuration information off the system and reload. > > Good luck, > Trever Thanks for your help Trevor I have managed to a) start a new server install with the software RAID I wanted - although I do get a worrying error on boot as posted in another thread, but it seems to work perfectly, even headless. b) used sysresccd to boot the old server and using advice elsewhere on this list got the mount commands out of anaconda.program.log and mounted the old RAID partitions. I've managed to successfully rsync off /home /etc and /root and I'm in the process of rsyncing the Bacula storage contents (long job as over 2TB) The Postgresql backup and an old tgz I already had on my backup backup server :-) Now it's just a case of working through each service and configuring it correctly. My only concern is version dependencies on the postgresql database and the Bacula Director config files but they're doable. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: A word to the wise regarding failed fedup upgrades
On 06/05/2014 01:56 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: > On Wednesday 04 June 2014 21:26:36 Trever L. Adams wrote: >> yum check >> >> Then do yum install for anything missing. If you have missing >> dependencies for that, contact me in private, I can provide specific >> files for x86_64. That is assuming you can't fetch rpms and extract the >> files manually. >> >> I have had this happen even with the "proper" clean up methods several >> times. It is a royal pain. >> >> Trever > Thanks for the offer Trevor, I'm going to need all the help I can. > > The situation is that I've currently got one open terminal session over ssh > and can do anything that is built into BASH. So far I've managed to 'cat' a > number of config files and copy/paste into gvim on a separate box. > > I can't run many command (even ls fails) because of missing GLIBC libraries. > > The system is running on a software RAID setup with sdb being a mirror of sda. > > I've pretty much decided that the server is in such a state that it's going > to > be easier to build a new one. I'm just loathed to log out my session as I > know I won't be able to log in again, and I'm loathed to reboot to a LIVEDVD > in case I can't mount the filesystems afterwards > > The system successfully fedup from 17 to 18 but then failed and got messy > doing 18 to 19. It now thinks the RPM's for 18 are installed but the actual > contents of the RPM's were removed trying to clear away the 19 ones. > Gary, Wow. If you are missing glibc, I am not sure I can help you. You need to find a static mount command and cp (possibly on rescue images). If you can do that, just suck the glibc stuff onto a flash drive with those and move them over. From there, you should be able to start rebuilding. Otherwise, you are correct, likely just better to copy data and configuration information off the system and reload. Good luck, Trever signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F19 install and custom / RAID partitioning
The install has succeeded but when I reboot I get the following: Booting 'Fedora, with Linux 3.9.5-301.fc19.x86_64' error: failure reading sector 0xfc from 'hd1'. error: failure reading sector 0xe0 from 'hd1'. error: failure reading sector 0x0 from 'hd1'. Secure boot not enabled Press any key to continue... However, even if I don't press any key it then boots normally. Anyone know what this means and how serious it is? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F19 install and custom / RAID partitioning
On Thursday 05 June 2014 10:29:36 Gary Stainburn wrote: > If I do not create the biosboot partition I can create everything else > without errors but when I return to the main screen I get an warning that > there is an error checking the storage configuration. The error is: > > you have not created a bootloader stage 1 target device > > This was the error that I google'd and got the instruction to create the > biosboot partition at 1MB > > catch 22 Not sure if it was the correct thing to do but I checked the BIOS settings and changed some of the stuff from legacy to EFI (?) then also created /boot/efi and the installation is now proceeding (hopefully) correctly. Next to work out how to boot my old server using a LIVE DVD and mount the old filesystems. Then sit and watch it rsync about 2GB. Yippee -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F19 install and custom / RAID partitioning
If I do not create the biosboot partition I can create everything else without errors but when I return to the main screen I get an warning that there is an error checking the storage configuration. The error is: you have not created a bootloader stage 1 target device This was the error that I google'd and got the instruction to create the biosboot partition at 1MB catch 22 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
F19 install and custom / RAID partitioning
Hi folks. I'm building a F19 box to replace my dead Bacula server and I'm trying to emulate as close as possible the F17 install I did then. However, this install UI is different and I've got a small probem. I've got 2 x 3TG drives sda and sdb. I've selected both drives (sda defaulted to boot device) Selected Standard Partitioning I'm in manual partitioning have done 1) +Mount point = /biosboot capacity = 1MB got this bit by googling a previous error partition put on sda1 2) +Mount point = /boot capacity = 50GB Device type = RAID /biosboot is moved to sda2 3) +Mount point = SWAP capacity = 6GB Device type = RAID /biosboot is moved to sda3 4) + Mount point = / capacity = 100GB Device type = RAID /biosboot is moved to sda4 5) + Mount point = /var/bacula capacity = blank (default to remaining space) Device type = RAID At this point I press "Update settings" to store the details for the last partition. As soon as I press the button it goes wrong and either removes some of the partitions or all of them and I get the message Storage configuration reset due to unrecoverable error. Click for details On clicking I then get the message Can't have overlapping partitions. Can anyone tell me what I need to do to sort this. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: A word to the wise regarding failed fedup upgrades
On Wednesday 04 June 2014 21:26:36 Trever L. Adams wrote: > > yum check > > Then do yum install for anything missing. If you have missing > dependencies for that, contact me in private, I can provide specific > files for x86_64. That is assuming you can't fetch rpms and extract the > files manually. > > I have had this happen even with the "proper" clean up methods several > times. It is a royal pain. > > Trever Thanks for the offer Trevor, I'm going to need all the help I can. The situation is that I've currently got one open terminal session over ssh and can do anything that is built into BASH. So far I've managed to 'cat' a number of config files and copy/paste into gvim on a separate box. I can't run many command (even ls fails) because of missing GLIBC libraries. The system is running on a software RAID setup with sdb being a mirror of sda. I've pretty much decided that the server is in such a state that it's going to be easier to build a new one. I'm just loathed to log out my session as I know I won't be able to log in again, and I'm loathed to reboot to a LIVEDVD in case I can't mount the filesystems afterwards The system successfully fedup from 17 to 18 but then failed and got messy doing 18 to 19. It now thinks the RPM's for 18 are installed but the actual contents of the RPM's were removed trying to clear away the 19 ones. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
