Re: Installing firmware for intel 7260

2014-08-20 Thread Geoffrey Leach
Does not work for an unrecognized piece of hardware. Alas.

The good news is that although I thought I'd installed all updates, that 
apparently was not the case. Hopefully that will resolve the version conflict 
that I've discovered from the dmesg output.

On 08/20/2014 05:58:25 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 08/20/2014 04:04 PM, Geoffrey Leach issued this missive:
> > Here's how to get a MAC address. Assuming (as I do) you have Windows
> on the same box, go there and start Windows. Then start wireless. Now
> go to the router admin page on Fedora, asn look to see what's
> attached. Voila!
> >
> > The bad news: upgraded the definition for the connection. Still no
> luck.
> >
> > How can I tell if the kernel sees the driver?
> 
> To get the MAC address, as root, "ifconfig -a", look for the wifi
> device
> and look for the "ether" bit...just like any NIC:
> 
> [root@golem4 local]# ifconfig wlan0
> wlan0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
>  inet 192.168.2.157  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast
> 192.168.2.255
>  inet6 fe80::be77:37ff:fe51:115c  prefixlen 64  scopeid
> 0x20
>   --->>> ether bc:77:37:51:11:5c  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet) <<<
>  RX packets 165126  bytes 31581078 (30.1 MiB)
>  RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
>  TX packets 17241  bytes 1449351 (1.3 MiB)
>  TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
> 
> Alternately, use "lspci -v" and look for its entry. The MAC will be
> listed as "Device Serial Number":
> 
> 01:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 1030
> 
> [Rainbow Peak] (rev 34)
>   Subsystem: Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 1030 BGN
>   Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 49
>   Memory at d160 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K]
>   Capabilities: [c8] Power Management version 3
>   Capabilities: [d0] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
>   Capabilities: [e0] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
>   Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
>   >>  Capabilities: [140] Device Serial Number
> bc-77-37-ff-ff-51-11-5c
>   Kernel driver in use: iwlwifi
>   Kernel modules: iwlwifi
> 
> At least it does for me. Your mileage may differ.
> 
> > On 08/20/2014 02:11:13 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> >> Hmmm ... memo to self: always google first.
> >>
> >> So, two things. The MAC address that I used was for the ethernet
> >> interface. ip does not show wifi, nor does lspci. The module is
> >> loaded.
> >>
> >> On 08/20/2014 02:02:48 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> >>> The kernel info at the link is helpful in that it confirms that
> the
> >>> 7260 is supported. Your modprobe command is the key. With all of
> the
> >>> permutations I tried, that particular one never occurred :-) Of
> >>> course, modprobe installed the firmware with nary a complaint.
> With
> >>> this, NetworkManager permitted me to create an entry for wifi,
> >>> although this did not allow me to connect, even after a reboot
> >>> (modprobe config file in place)
> >>>
> >>> The only thing that I can think of is that I mis-copied the MAC
> >>> address at install time. Any idea how to find it?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 08/20/2014 01:07:22 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>  On 08/20/2014 03:47 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> > I'm setting up a laptop with Fedora 19 up-to-date. The wireless
> >>> chip
>  is an Intel 7260.HMW, and I've confirmed that it works (under
>  windows). The chip was not recognized by the install, so I did a
> >> yum
>  install of iwl7260.firmware.noarch. That did not install the
> >> module,
>  and insmod refuses to install either of the two ucode files. So,
>  presumably they're not modules ("firmware" might be a clue?) So,
> >> how
>  should I proceed at this point?
> 
>  Have you looked here?
> 
>  http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/iwlwifi
> 
>  What happens when you "modprobe iwlwifi" with the firmware
> >>> installed?
> 
> > Thanks.
> 
> --
> - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
> - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 -
> --
> -   Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.-
> --
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
> 


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fed

Re: Installing firmware for intel 7260

2014-08-20 Thread Rick Stevens

On 08/20/2014 04:04 PM, Geoffrey Leach issued this missive:

Here's how to get a MAC address. Assuming (as I do) you have Windows on the 
same box, go there and start Windows. Then start wireless. Now go to the router 
admin page on Fedora, asn look to see what's attached. Voila!

The bad news: upgraded the definition for the connection. Still no luck.

How can I tell if the kernel sees the driver?


To get the MAC address, as root, "ifconfig -a", look for the wifi device
and look for the "ether" bit...just like any NIC:

[root@golem4 local]# ifconfig wlan0
wlan0: flags=4163  mtu 1500
inet 192.168.2.157  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.2.255
inet6 fe80::be77:37ff:fe51:115c  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20
 --->>> ether bc:77:37:51:11:5c  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet) <<<
RX packets 165126  bytes 31581078 (30.1 MiB)
RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
TX packets 17241  bytes 1449351 (1.3 MiB)
TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

Alternately, use "lspci -v" and look for its entry. The MAC will be
listed as "Device Serial Number":

01:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 1030 
[Rainbow Peak] (rev 34)

Subsystem: Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 1030 BGN
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 49
Memory at d160 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K]
Capabilities: [c8] Power Management version 3
Capabilities: [d0] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
Capabilities: [e0] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
 >>   Capabilities: [140] Device Serial Number bc-77-37-ff-ff-51-11-5c
Kernel driver in use: iwlwifi
Kernel modules: iwlwifi

At least it does for me. Your mileage may differ.


On 08/20/2014 02:11:13 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:

Hmmm ... memo to self: always google first.

So, two things. The MAC address that I used was for the ethernet
interface. ip does not show wifi, nor does lspci. The module is
loaded.

On 08/20/2014 02:02:48 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:

The kernel info at the link is helpful in that it confirms that the
7260 is supported. Your modprobe command is the key. With all of the
permutations I tried, that particular one never occurred :-) Of
course, modprobe installed the firmware with nary a complaint. With
this, NetworkManager permitted me to create an entry for wifi,
although this did not allow me to connect, even after a reboot
(modprobe config file in place)

The only thing that I can think of is that I mis-copied the MAC
address at install time. Any idea how to find it?


On 08/20/2014 01:07:22 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:

On 08/20/2014 03:47 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:

I'm setting up a laptop with Fedora 19 up-to-date. The wireless

chip

is an Intel 7260.HMW, and I've confirmed that it works (under
windows). The chip was not recognized by the install, so I did a

yum

install of iwl7260.firmware.noarch. That did not install the

module,

and insmod refuses to install either of the two ucode files. So,
presumably they're not modules ("firmware" might be a clue?) So,

how

should I proceed at this point?

Have you looked here?

http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/iwlwifi

What happens when you "modprobe iwlwifi" with the firmware

installed?



Thanks.



--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-   Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.-
--
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing firmware for intel 7260

2014-08-20 Thread Geoffrey Leach
Here's how to get a MAC address. Assuming (as I do) you have Windows on the 
same box, go there and start Windows. Then start wireless. Now go to the router 
admin page on Fedora, asn look to see what's attached. Voila!

The bad news: upgraded the definition for the connection. Still no luck.

How can I tell if the kernel sees the driver?


On 08/20/2014 02:11:13 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> Hmmm ... memo to self: always google first.
> 
> So, two things. The MAC address that I used was for the ethernet
> interface. ip does not show wifi, nor does lspci. The module is
> loaded.
> 
> On 08/20/2014 02:02:48 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> > The kernel info at the link is helpful in that it confirms that the
> > 7260 is supported. Your modprobe command is the key. With all of the
> > permutations I tried, that particular one never occurred :-) Of
> > course, modprobe installed the firmware with nary a complaint. With
> > this, NetworkManager permitted me to create an entry for wifi,
> > although this did not allow me to connect, even after a reboot
> > (modprobe config file in place)
> > 
> > The only thing that I can think of is that I mis-copied the MAC
> > address at install time. Any idea how to find it?
> > 
> > 
> > On 08/20/2014 01:07:22 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> > > On 08/20/2014 03:47 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> > > > I'm setting up a laptop with Fedora 19 up-to-date. The wireless
> > chip
> > > is an Intel 7260.HMW, and I've confirmed that it works (under
> > > windows). The chip was not recognized by the install, so I did a
> yum
> > > install of iwl7260.firmware.noarch. That did not install the
> module,
> > > and insmod refuses to install either of the two ucode files. So,
> > > presumably they're not modules ("firmware" might be a clue?) So,
> how
> > > should I proceed at this point?
> > > 
> > > Have you looked here?
> > > 
> > > http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/iwlwifi
> > > 
> > > What happens when you "modprobe iwlwifi" with the firmware
> > installed?
> > > 
> > > > Thanks.
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Kevin J. Cummings
> > > kjch...@verizon.net
> > > cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net
> > > cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us
> > > Registered Linux User #1232 (http://www.linuxcounter.net/)
> > > -- 
> > > users mailing list
> > > users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> > > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > users mailing list
> > users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
> 


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: CA pinning for DNF (sslcacert honoured?)

2014-08-20 Thread Joonas Lehtonen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Joonas Lehtonen:
> That tells me that dnf parses the same repo files as dnf,

should read:
That tells me that dnf parses the same repo files as yum,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=kJqV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


CA pinning for DNF (sslcacert honoured?)

2014-08-20 Thread Joonas Lehtonen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

since it has been suggested that I should file bug [1] (CA pinning for
mirrors.fedoraproject.org for yum) also against yum's successor dnf
[2], I'm wondering if sslcacert is also understood by dnf?

from the man page of dnf.conf:
"DNF  by  default uses the global configuration file at
/etc/dnf/dnf.conf and all *.repo files found under /etc/yum.repos.d."

That tells me that dnf parses the same repo files as dnf, but there is
no 'sslcacert' option in dnf.conf 's man page. So I'm wondering
whether just the man page is not complete or dnf has no such option (yet)?

next step would be to simply try it..




[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131673
[2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-June/199808.html
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceYumWithDNF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=SQ9u
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing firmware for intel 7260

2014-08-20 Thread Geoffrey Leach
Hmmm ... memo to self: always google first.

So, two things. The MAC address that I used was for the ethernet interface. ip 
does not show wifi, nor does lspci. The module is loaded.

On 08/20/2014 02:02:48 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> The kernel info at the link is helpful in that it confirms that the
> 7260 is supported. Your modprobe command is the key. With all of the
> permutations I tried, that particular one never occurred :-) Of
> course, modprobe installed the firmware with nary a complaint. With
> this, NetworkManager permitted me to create an entry for wifi,
> although this did not allow me to connect, even after a reboot
> (modprobe config file in place)
> 
> The only thing that I can think of is that I mis-copied the MAC
> address at install time. Any idea how to find it?
> 
> 
> On 08/20/2014 01:07:22 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> > On 08/20/2014 03:47 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> > > I'm setting up a laptop with Fedora 19 up-to-date. The wireless
> chip
> > is an Intel 7260.HMW, and I've confirmed that it works (under
> > windows). The chip was not recognized by the install, so I did a yum
> > install of iwl7260.firmware.noarch. That did not install the module,
> > and insmod refuses to install either of the two ucode files. So,
> > presumably they're not modules ("firmware" might be a clue?) So, how
> > should I proceed at this point?
> > 
> > Have you looked here?
> > 
> > http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/iwlwifi
> > 
> > What happens when you "modprobe iwlwifi" with the firmware
> installed?
> > 
> > > Thanks.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Kevin J. Cummings
> > kjch...@verizon.net
> > cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net
> > cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us
> > Registered Linux User #1232 (http://www.linuxcounter.net/)
> > -- 
> > users mailing list
> > users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
> 


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing firmware for intel 7260

2014-08-20 Thread Geoffrey Leach
The kernel info at the link is helpful in that it confirms that the 7260 is 
supported. Your modprobe command is the key. With all of the permutations I 
tried, that particular one never occurred :-) Of course, modprobe installed the 
firmware with nary a complaint. With this, NetworkManager permitted me to 
create an entry for wifi, although this did not allow me to connect, even after 
a reboot (modprobe config file in place)

The only thing that I can think of is that I mis-copied the MAC address at 
install time. Any idea how to find it?


On 08/20/2014 01:07:22 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> On 08/20/2014 03:47 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> > I'm setting up a laptop with Fedora 19 up-to-date. The wireless chip
> is an Intel 7260.HMW, and I've confirmed that it works (under
> windows). The chip was not recognized by the install, so I did a yum
> install of iwl7260.firmware.noarch. That did not install the module,
> and insmod refuses to install either of the two ucode files. So,
> presumably they're not modules ("firmware" might be a clue?) So, how
> should I proceed at this point?
> 
> Have you looked here?
> 
> http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/iwlwifi
> 
> What happens when you "modprobe iwlwifi" with the firmware installed?
> 
> > Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Kevin J. Cummings
> kjch...@verizon.net
> cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net
> cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us
> Registered Linux User #1232 (http://www.linuxcounter.net/)
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
> 


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing firmware for intel 7260

2014-08-20 Thread Joe Zeff

On 08/20/2014 12:47 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:

I'm setting up a laptop with Fedora 19 up-to-date. The wireless chip is an Intel 
7260.HMW, and I've confirmed that it works (under windows). The chip was not recognized 
by the install, so I did a yum install of iwl7260.firmware.noarch. That did not install 
the module, and insmod refuses to install either of the two ucode files. So, presumably 
they're not modules ("firmware" might be a clue?) So, how should I proceed at 
this point?


I tried to check this with yum info but it told me that there were no 
matching packages.  However, yum list iwl7260\* gave me 
iwl7260-firmware.noarch.  (A simple typo; tish happens.)  This time, yum 
info reports that it's the firmware needed by the iwlagn driver.  Do you 
have that installed?

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing firmware for intel 7260

2014-08-20 Thread Kevin J. Cummings
On 08/20/2014 03:47 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> I'm setting up a laptop with Fedora 19 up-to-date. The wireless chip is an 
> Intel 7260.HMW, and I've confirmed that it works (under windows). The chip 
> was not recognized by the install, so I did a yum install of 
> iwl7260.firmware.noarch. That did not install the module, and insmod refuses 
> to install either of the two ucode files. So, presumably they're not modules 
> ("firmware" might be a clue?) So, how should I proceed at this point?

Have you looked here?

http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/iwlwifi

What happens when you "modprobe iwlwifi" with the firmware installed?

> Thanks.

-- 
Kevin J. Cummings
kjch...@verizon.net
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net
cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us
Registered Linux User #1232 (http://www.linuxcounter.net/)
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Installing firmware for intel 7260

2014-08-20 Thread Geoffrey Leach
I'm setting up a laptop with Fedora 19 up-to-date. The wireless chip is an 
Intel 7260.HMW, and I've confirmed that it works (under windows). The chip was 
not recognized by the install, so I did a yum install of 
iwl7260.firmware.noarch. That did not install the module, and insmod refuses to 
install either of the two ucode files. So, presumably they're not modules 
("firmware" might be a clue?) So, how should I proceed at this point?

Thanks.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: F20, XFCE : no X - xf86EnableIOPorts failed - FBIOBLANK Invalid

2014-08-20 Thread sean darcy

On 8/20/2014 11:31 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:

On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:02:09 -0400
sean darcy  wrote:


I've just installed F20 on on an Acer Asprire, A8-7100,  R5 Kaveri
graphics.

startx runs, then exits the server.

My errors show /dev/dri/card0 no such file. Is this because the
kernel isn't loading the radeon module?

Xorg.0.log shows the radeon driver loaded:

[snip]

Do you have something in /etc/X11/xorg.conf or /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ ?

Can you provide the full log file, just to be sure?

What is the output of "lspci | grep vga"?

Best, :-)
Marko



Thanks for the response.

It's a brand new install. No xorg.conf, nothing in xorg.conf.d:


[   596.757] (==) Using config directory: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d"
[   596.757] (==) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d"
[   596.757] (==) No Layout section.  Using the first Screen section.
[   596.757] (==) No screen section available. Using defaults.
[   596.757] (**) |-->Screen "Default Screen Section" (0)
[   596.757] (**) |   |-->Monitor ""
[   596.757] (==) No monitor specified for screen "Default Screen Section".
Using a default monitor configuration.
[   596.757] (==) Automatically adding devices
[   596.757] (==) Automatically enabling devices
[   596.757] (==) Automatically adding GPU devices

I modprobe'd radeon and drm, which got rid of the xf86EnableIOPorts 
error. But still /dev/dri/card0 was not created. Shouldn't the radeon 
kernel module create /dev/dri ?


Here's the full original log:

[   596.755]
X.Org X Server 1.14.4
Release Date: 2013-10-31
[   596.755] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[   596.755] Build Operating System:  3.14.3-200.fc20.x86_64
[   596.755] Current Operating System: Linux localhost.localdomain 
3.15.10-200.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Aug 14 15:39:24 UTC 2014 x86_64
[   596.755] Kernel command line: 
BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.15.10-200.fc20.x86_64 root=/dev/mapper/fedora-root 
ro rd.lvm.lv=fedora/swap vconsole.font=latarcyrheb-sun16 
rd.lvm.lv=fedora/root LANG=en_US.UTF-8

[   596.756] Build Date: 27 June 2014  01:35:28AM
[   596.756] Build ID: xorg-x11-server 1.14.4-11.fc20
[   596.756] Current version of pixman: 0.30.0
[   596.756]Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
[   596.756] Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default 
setting,

(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
[   596.756] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Wed Aug 20 
08:16:31 2014

[   596.757] (==) Using config directory: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d"
[   596.757] (==) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d"
[   596.757] (==) No Layout section.  Using the first Screen section.
[   596.757] (==) No screen section available. Using defaults.
[   596.757] (**) |-->Screen "Default Screen Section" (0)
[   596.757] (**) |   |-->Monitor ""
[   596.757] (==) No monitor specified for screen "Default Screen Section".
Using a default monitor configuration.
[   596.757] (==) Automatically adding devices
[   596.757] (==) Automatically enabling devices
[   596.757] (==) Automatically adding GPU devices
[   596.757] (==) FontPath set to:
catalogue:/etc/X11/fontpath.d,
built-ins
[   596.757] (==) ModulePath set to "/usr/lib64/xorg/modules"
[   596.757] (II) The server relies on udev to provide the list of input 
devices.

If no devices become available, reconfigure udev or disable 
AutoAddDevices.
[   596.757] (II) Loader magic: 0x80dd00
[   596.757] (II) Module ABI versions:
[   596.757]X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.4
[   596.757]X.Org Video Driver: 14.1
[   596.757]X.Org XInput driver : 19.2
[   596.757]X.Org Server Extension : 7.0
[   596.759] (--) PCI:*(0:0:1:0) 1002:1318:1025:0864 rev 0, Mem @ 
0xe000/268435456, 0xf000/8388608, 0xf0a0/262144, I/O @ 
0x3000/256, BIOS @ 0x/131072

[   596.759] Initializing built-in extension Generic Event Extension
[   596.759] Initializing built-in extension SHAPE
[   596.759] Initializing built-in extension MIT-SHM
[   596.760] Initializing built-in extension XInputExtension
[   596.760] Initializing built-in extension XTEST
[   596.760] Initializing built-in extension BIG-REQUESTS
[   596.760] Initializing built-in extension SYNC
[   596.760] Initializing built-in extension XKEYBOARD
[   596.760] Initializing built-in extension XC-MISC
[   596.760] Initializing built-in extension XINERAMA
[   596.760] Initializing built-in extension XFIXES
[   596.760] Initializing built-in extension RENDER
[   596.760] Initializing built-in extension RANDR
[   596.760] Initializing built-in extension COMPOSITE
[   596.760] Initializing built-in extension DAMAGE
[   596.760] Initializing built-in extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER
[   596.761] Initializing built-in extension DOUBLE-BUFFER
[   596.761] Initializing built-in extension RECORD
[   596.762] Initializing built

Re: F20, XFCE : no X - xf86EnableIOPorts failed - FBIOBLANK Invalid

2014-08-20 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:02:09 -0400
sean darcy  wrote:

> I've just installed F20 on on an Acer Asprire, A8-7100,  R5 Kaveri
> graphics.
> 
> startx runs, then exits the server.
> 
> My errors show /dev/dri/card0 no such file. Is this because the
> kernel isn't loading the radeon module?
> 
> Xorg.0.log shows the radeon driver loaded:
[snip]

Do you have something in /etc/X11/xorg.conf or /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ ?

Can you provide the full log file, just to be sure?

What is the output of "lspci | grep vga"?

Best, :-)
Marko

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: digikam problem

2014-08-20 Thread George Avrunin
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:28:46 +0100, "Patrick O'Callaghan"
 wrote:

> On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 17:51 -0400, George Avrunin wrote:
> > I wrote to the digikam list about this a few days ago, but haven't
> > gotten any response, so I thought I'd check here before filing a bug.
> 
> You might also consider the Fedora-KDE list, which would have a higher
> density of Digikam expertise than the general Users list. See
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
> 
> poc
> 

Thanks, I'll try that.

  George




signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


F20, XFCE : no X - xf86EnableIOPorts failed - FBIOBLANK Invalid

2014-08-20 Thread sean darcy

I've just installed F20 on on an Acer Asprire, A8-7100,  R5 Kaveri graphics.

startx runs, then exits the server.

My errors show /dev/dri/card0 no such file. Is this because the kernel 
isn't loading the radeon module?


Xorg.0.log shows the radeon driver loaded:

X.Org X Server 1.14.4
Release Date: 2013-10-31
[   596.755] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[   596.755] Build Operating System:  3.14.3-200.fc20.x86_64
[   596.755] Current Operating System: Linux localhost.localdomain 
3.15.10-200.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Aug 14 15:39:24 UTC 2014 x86_64
[   596.755] Kernel command line: 
BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.15.10-200.fc20.x86_64 root=/dev/mapper/fedora-root 
ro rd.lvm.lv=fedora/swap vconsole.font=latarcyrheb-sun16 
rd.lvm.lv=fedora/root LANG=en_US.UTF-8

[   596.756] Build Date: 27 June 2014  01:35:28AM
[   596.756] Build ID: xorg-x11-server 1.14.4-11.fc20
.
[   596.771] (II) LoadModule: "radeon"
[   596.771] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so
[   596.772] (II) Module radeon: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[   596.772]compiled for 1.14.3, module version = 7.2.99
[   596.772]Module class: X.Org Video Driver
[   596.772]ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1
[   596.772] (II) LoadModule: "modesetting"
[   596.772] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/modesetting_drv.so
[   596.772] (II) Module modesetting: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[   596.772]compiled for 1.14.2, module version = 0.8.0
[   596.772]Module class: X.Org Video Driver
[   596.772]ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1
[   596.772] (II) LoadModule: "fbdev"
[   596.772] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.so
[   596.772] (II) Module fbdev: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[   596.772]compiled for 1.14.2, module version = 0.4.3
[   596.772]Module class: X.Org Video Driver
[   596.772]ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1
[   596.772] (II) LoadModule: "vesa"
[   596.772] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.so
[   596.772] (II) Module vesa: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[   596.772]compiled for 1.14.2, module version = 2.3.2
[   596.772]Module class: X.Org Video Driver
[   596.772]ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1
[   596.772] (II) RADEON: Driver for ATI Radeon chipsets:
...


but then:

KAVERI, KAVERI, KAVERI, KAVERI, KAVERI, KAVERI, KAVERI, KAVERI
[   596.778] (II) modesetting: Driver for Modesetting Kernel Drivers: kms
[   596.778] (II) FBDEV: driver for framebuffer: fbdev
[   596.778] (II) VESA: driver for VESA chipsets: vesa
[   596.778] (++) using VT number 1

[   596.781] xf86EnableIOPorts: failed to set IOPL for I/O (Operation 
not permitted)

[   596.781] (EE) open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
[   596.781] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for modesetting
[   596.781] (EE) open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
[   596.781] (II) Loading sub module "fbdevhw"
[   596.781] (II) LoadModule: "fbdevhw"
[   596.781] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libfbdevhw.so
[   596.781] (II) Module fbdevhw: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[   596.781]compiled for 1.14.4, module version = 0.0.2
[   596.781]ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 14.1
[   596.781] (**) FBDEV(1): claimed PCI slot 0@0:1:0
[   596.781] (II) FBDEV(1): using default device
[   596.781] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for vesa
[   596.781] (EE) Screen 0 deleted because of no matching config section.
[   596.781] (II) UnloadModule: "modesetting"
[   596.781] (II) FBDEV(0): Creating default Display subsection in 
Screen section

"Default Screen Section" for depth/fbbpp 24/32
[   596.781] (==) FBDEV(0): Depth 24, (==) framebuffer bpp 32
[   596.781] (==) FBDEV(0): RGB weight 888
[   596.781] (==) FBDEV(0): Default visual is TrueColor
[   596.781] (==) FBDEV(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0)
[   596.781] (II) FBDEV(0): hardware: EFI VGA (video memory: 4224kB)
[   596.781] (II) FBDEV(0): checking modes against framebuffer device...
[   596.781] (II) FBDEV(0): checking modes against monitor...
[   596.781] (--) FBDEV(0): Virtual size is 1366x768 (pitch 1366)
[   596.781] (**) FBDEV(0):  Built-in mode "current": 104.9 MHz, 60.5 
kHz, 76.4 Hz
[   596.781] (II) FBDEV(0): Modeline "current"x0.0  104.92  1366 1398 
1566 1734  768 772 776 792 -hsync -vsync -csync (60.5 kHz b)

[   596.781] (==) FBDEV(0): DPI set to (96, 96)
[   596.781] (II) Loading sub module "fb"
[   596.781] (II) LoadModule: "fb"
[   596.781] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libfb.so
[   596.781] (II) Module fb: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[   596.781]compiled for 1.14.4, module version = 1.0.0
[   596.781]ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4
[   596.781] (**) FBDEV(0): using shadow framebuffer
[   596.781] (II) Loading sub module "shadow"
[   596.781] (II) LoadModule: "shadow"
[   596.781] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libshadow.so
[   596.781] (II) Module shadow: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[   59

Re: digikam problem

2014-08-20 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 17:51 -0400, George Avrunin wrote:
> I wrote to the digikam list about this a few days ago, but haven't
> gotten any response, so I thought I'd check here before filing a bug.

You might also consider the Fedora-KDE list, which would have a higher
density of Digikam expertise than the general Users list. See
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde

poc

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: HP officejet 7500A loose wireless connection with f19 & f20

2014-08-20 Thread Tim Waugh
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 19:18 -0400, Vinny Onelli wrote:
> A couple time I was able to print after going through the printer setup
> and re-installing the printer on computer, but only last for one or two
> print.

You could try using the printing troubleshooter:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_printing_problems#Printing_troubleshooter

That will try to diagnose the problem, and if it can't work out what the
issue is you will end up with some useful information to put into a bug
report.

Tim.
*/



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org