Re: User friendly proxy configuration
You can put this in your ~/.bashrc: export http_proxy="http://127.0.0.1:3128"; export ftp_proxy="ftp://127.0.0.1:3128"; I'm not sure how many utilities use it but I think wget does. Bill On 11/16/2014 8:18 AM, Alexis Jeandet wrote: Le 15/11/2014 07:17, Tim a écrit : On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 13:55 +0100, Alexis Jeandet wrote: my question was more about apps like YUM/DNF which doesn't care about gnome config and doesn't like pac files. My thoughts are that I should write maybe a simple scripts triggered by network manager which configures everything depending on the current host IP or something like this. Have you looked through man yum.conf to see the proxy options? Perhaps you could write a network manager script to modify the yum.conf file each time you go online, and something checks for the pac file. This is the first thing I did, since YUM and DNF doesn't accept .pac file, the current solution is that each time you change you change your network you have to edit /etc/yum.conf or /etc/dnf/dnf.conf . Anyway I think I got my answer, I will write the script. The alternative option, if you don't want users to go around customising things, is to use a transparent proxy, which everything goes through, without option. I do agree, but sadly my lab doesn't manage the proxy, we have to deal with it and as it is. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Latest systemd news
Hi On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Right. Like "systemd developers" have such an established track record of > listening to feedback from the community, > That has no connection to what I said. If you have already made up your mind, that's fine but if you are wondering why it is implemented, the right place to direct the question is to the developers and not in a user mailing list of a distribution which doesn't even use the component at all yet. Rahul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Latest systemd news
Rahul Sundaram writes: Hi On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Why did the systemd project add this to the scope of the project for "a system and service manager for Linux"? This was something that could have been easily asked to systemd developers rather than the long rant that was posted. In any case, Right. Like "systemd developers" have such an established track record of listening to feedback from the community, and the DNS cache was implemented only pursuant to an open, lengthy discussion on the merits and disadvantages of it. https://lwn.net/Articles/621201/>https://lwn.net/Articles/621201/ Er… I don't think so. The scenario outlined there would be a valid argument for a simple DNS proxy, and nothing more. I could see this being a perfectly reasonable, and prudent, argument for a simple DNS proxy, that all containers get pointed to, and which forwards the DNS queries to whatever the current outside DNS server the host is configured for, at the moment. That makes perfect sense. A cobbled-together DNS cache, on the other hand, makes no sense, whatsoever. Reports of a compromised container poisoning the systemd DNS cache, and uses that to attack other containers on the same systems, in 3… 2… 1… This is really nothing more than a NIH syndrome. Really, that's all this is. pgp0puu9TObGS.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Latest systemd news
On 11/17/2014 06:54 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Chris Adamswrote: Why did the systemd project add this to the scope of the project for "a system and service manager for Linux"? This was something that could have been easily asked to systemd developers rather than the long rant that was posted. In any case, https://lwn.net/Articles/621201/ Also CoreOS sponsored development of a lot of network stack. You can refer to their guides on how they are using it. "already from the basic design resolved is very different from unbound. resolved keeps a seperate "scope" for the DNS servers on each interface. A "scope" is a resolver state machine plus a cache. That way, we can neatly separate VPN DNS servers from internet DNS servers, and merge them transparently. That means that with resolved in the mix for the first time you don't lose access to your LAN's DNS names, fully automatically, without any manual hacks. Also, as interfaces come and go their caches do too with this scheme, hence all the cache flushing complexity of dnssec-trigger doesn't exist at all. Then, because we actually implement LLMNR and DNS int he same stack (as well as mDNS very soon), we can transparently merge those protocols too." For those of us that deal with VPNs, we know how hard split horizon is, and actually how important it is for good performance. It is almost a shame it took until now for someone to address DNS by Interface. Actually it coincides with work in IETF on such matters. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Latest systemd news
Hi On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > > Why did the systemd > project add this to the scope of the project for "a system and service > manager for Linux"? This was something that could have been easily asked to systemd developers rather than the long rant that was posted. In any case, https://lwn.net/Articles/621201/ Also CoreOS sponsored development of a lot of network stack. You can refer to their guides on how they are using it. Rahul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Latest systemd news
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Juan Orti said: > > systemd-resolved is a daemon for resolving DNS. What's wrong about > > caching? All DNS servers perform caching. > > > > It's like if you have unbound at 127.0.0.1 as local resolver, that's a > > very common setup. > > Well, that's the point. We already have multiple, perfectly functional, > caching resolvers. We have resolver libraries. Why did the systemd > project add this to the scope of the project for "a system and service > manager for Linux"? Why didn't they re-use existing services and/or > libraries? Why re-invent a wheel that happens to have a number of > corner cases that can be tricky to get right (and a security problem if > you get it wrong)? > > In general DNS caching may be useful, but with other perfectly good solution(s) (i.e. nscd) for Linux the implementation of the same in systemd does not add value. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Latest systemd news
Once upon a time, Juan Orti said: > systemd-resolved is a daemon for resolving DNS. What's wrong about > caching? All DNS servers perform caching. > > It's like if you have unbound at 127.0.0.1 as local resolver, that's a > very common setup. Well, that's the point. We already have multiple, perfectly functional, caching resolvers. We have resolver libraries. Why did the systemd project add this to the scope of the project for "a system and service manager for Linux"? Why didn't they re-use existing services and/or libraries? Why re-invent a wheel that happens to have a number of corner cases that can be tricky to get right (and a security problem if you get it wrong)? -- Chris Adams -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dd question (from man page)
On 17Nov2014 13:22, Rick Stevens wrote: On 11/17/2014 11:28 AM, jd1008 issued this missive: Man page says: ... fdatasync physically write output file data before finishing fsync likewise, but also write metadata There is no explanation about this, as dd is supposed to be agnostic about the type of the data. If a disk is being dd'ed out to a file and the disk is mounted, (which is a BD thing to do), then even there, dd is agnostic about FS data and FS metadata. So, what data and metadata is the manpage talking about? I believe it's referring to LVM or BIOS RAID metadata. Not at all. dd neither knows nor cares about the underlying disc metaphor (RAID, whatever). These two terms refer to the fdatasync and fsync system calls; see "man 2 fdatasync" and "man 2 fsync". To quote from the fdatasync manual entry: fdatasync() flushes all data buffers of a file to disk (before the system call returns). It resembles fsync() but is not required to update the metadata such as access time. and has some followon discussion. Cheers, Cameron Simpson Never attribute to malice that which can be attributed to stupidity. - Hanlon's Razor -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Latest systemd news
El sáb, 15-11-2014 a las 08:53 -0500, Sam Varshavchik escribió: > Making the rounds of various technical mailing lists yesterday, with a > subject that's typically a variation of "Just for yucks, and giggles" is a > link to a commit to systemd's git, adding DNS caching to systemd; in one, > huge 857 line glop. Here's its entire commit message: "resolved: add DNS > cache". systemd-resolved is a daemon for resolving DNS. What's wrong about caching? All DNS servers perform caching. It's like if you have unbound at 127.0.0.1 as local resolver, that's a very common setup. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dd question (from man page)
On 11/17/2014 11:28 AM, jd1008 issued this missive: > Man page says: > ... > >fdatasync > physically write output file data before finishing > >fsync likewise, but also write metadata > > > There is no explanation about this, as dd is supposed to be agnostic > about the type of the data. > > If a disk is being dd'ed out to a file and the disk is mounted, > (which is a BD thing to do), then even there, dd is agnostic > about FS data and FS metadata. > > So, what data and metadata is the manpage talking about? I believe it's referring to LVM or BIOS RAID metadata. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - A squeegee, by any other name, wouldn't sound as funny. - -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Out of the Broadcom frying pan (DELL) to the fire (HP Envy)
On 17.11.2014 19:46, jd1008 wrote:
>
> On 11/17/2014 03:45 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>> On Monday 17 November 2014 10:39:20 Heinz Diehl wrote:
>>> You could also grep for "BCM4352" in the latest kernel sourcetree.
>> What would that give me?
>>
>> I'm certainly not up to kernel hacking, that's beyond my abilities.
> It is not hacking.
> Just a download of the source rpm, installing the source RPM (rpm -ivh
> fpm-file-name),
> cd to the SPECS directory, run the command
> rpmbuild -bp kernel.spec
> cd to where . BUILD/kernel-{version}
> there, run the command make xconfig
> and then search through the gui config for BCM4352 or bcm4352
> in case the search is case sensitive, and if found,
> enable the building of the driver, save and exit and run
> make all
> then make install
>
> I wish there was a way to edit kernel.spec, or provide args to rpmbuild
> to achieve the same thing
> I describe above.
>
>
Broadcom 43xx PCI-SSB bridge module - Sonics Silicon Backplane driver
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/ssb/b43_pci_bridge.c
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
dd question (from man page)
Man page says: ... fdatasync physically write output file data before finishing fsync likewise, but also write metadata There is no explanation about this, as dd is supposed to be agnostic about the type of the data. If a disk is being dd'ed out to a file and the disk is mounted, (which is a BD thing to do), then even there, dd is agnostic about FS data and FS metadata. So, what data and metadata is the manpage talking about? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Out of the Broadcom frying pan (DELL) to the fire (HP Envy)
On 11/17/2014 03:45 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
On Monday 17 November 2014 10:39:20 Heinz Diehl wrote:
You could also grep for "BCM4352" in the latest kernel sourcetree.
What would that give me?
I'm certainly not up to kernel hacking, that's beyond my abilities.
It is not hacking.
Just a download of the source rpm, installing the source RPM (rpm -ivh
fpm-file-name),
cd to the SPECS directory, run the command
rpmbuild -bp kernel.spec
cd to where . BUILD/kernel-{version}
there, run the command make xconfig
and then search through the gui config for BCM4352 or bcm4352
in case the search is case sensitive, and if found,
enable the building of the driver, save and exit and run
make all
then make install
I wish there was a way to edit kernel.spec, or provide args to rpmbuild
to achieve the same thing
I describe above.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Clearing the unallocated disk space
On 11/16/2014 09:58 PM, Tim wrote: On Sun, 2014-11-16 at 22:17 -0600, g wrote: hard disk drive manufactures _are_not_ NSA. you _are_not_ NSA. they do not connect hdd's to computers and try to read drives to see what is on them. to do so is a waist of their time. There have been cases of people getting refurbished drives which did have the previous owners data on them. There's all sorts of data on a drive that you want to keep private, without even thinking of nefarious reasons. Personal mail, addresses, family photos, insecurely cached data pertaining to banking, or other data that can lead to identity theft. If the drive was cheap enough, and you've had enough life out of it before it went west, it's worth considering just wrecking it. But if it were fairly new, or horribly expensive, then I would consider wiping (or filling it with junk files) and returning it. Well, seeing how disk drive prices are coming down to earth, destruction seems to be a much more viable alternative. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Clearing the unallocated disk space
On 11/16/2014 09:46 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 2:04 PM, jd1008 mailto:jd1...@gmail.com>> wrote: Before sending the drive for warranty service, what is the best way to clean the unallocated blocks? If this is really important to you, just eat the cost of the drive and destroy it instead of sending it back. If not modern drives provide a secure erase function and you should use that. You can use hdparm to do this. Thank you Bruno. I had come across some sites a couple of years ago that claimed all modern drives have some number of gigabytes that are not touched by hdparm and are also untouched by using dd /dev/zero into the unmounted disk. How can anyone ascertain this unless one is a disk drive HW engineer and can tell the pieces of electronics inside the disk, and even on it's controller. If any part of this is true, then destruction seems to be the only alternative for all security and privacy minded users. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Linux Hardware Compatibility List (was: HP Envy ...)
On 11/17/2014 7:30 AM, Bill Oliver wrote: <[snip]> I'm thinking about replacing my aging laptop. I remember a few years ago that there were some places that listed what laptops were and were not linux-friendly. Is there a good site that lists the degree of fedora-friendliness for (relatively) recent laptop models? The LinuxQuestions.org site maintains an HCL -- Hardware Compatibility List. http://www.linuxquestions.org/hcl/ Ken -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: HP Envy Touchpad button problems
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, fedora wrote: Hi Gary i own an HP EliteBook with similar touchpad as you describe. I followed the instructions in https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Touchpad_Synaptics but was only partially happy, to say the least: 1. single tap as click left mouse button works practically always 2. two finder scroll works always 3. two finder tap as click right mouse button works about 50% 4. three finder tap as click middle button works practically never. suomi [snip] I'm thinking about replacing my aging laptop. I remember a few years ago that there were some places that listed what laptops were and were not linux-friendly. Is there a good site that lists the degree of fedora-friendliness for (relatively) recent laptop models? billo -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Clearing the unallocated disk space
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Ed Greshko wrote: On 11/17/14 12:58, Tim wrote: There have been cases of people getting refurbished drives which did have the previous owners data on them. Do you have first hand knowledge of this or is this something you've just heard about? The reason I ask this is I have a friend that worked at WD in the HD manufacturing and refurbishment area a few years back. I had asked him about this very same thing. He indicated that WD had very strict quality control and he couldn't think of a way it would pass through their processes with previous data still intact. Or, maybe you're talking about cases where the drives aren't actually going back to the manufacturer? Well, it's been reported a number of times. See, for instance: http://ask.slashdot.org/story/12/02/09/1525212/ask-slashdot-how-to-deal-with-refurbed-drives-with-customer-data I've bought "refurbished" *computers* with data on them -- though it was clearly not the drive that was "refurbished." There are still a lot of small computer stores, particularly in rural areas, that spiff up older boxes and sell them at a discount, and there are vendors at those things they hold at the state fairgrounds now and then who show up with piles of old laptops they sell for a song. Those are all sold as "refurbished," but pretty much really mean "we vacuumed the keyboard and replaced the broken power connector." billo -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: HP Envy Touchpad button problems
Hi Gary i own an HP EliteBook with similar touchpad as you describe. I followed the instructions in https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Touchpad_Synaptics but was only partially happy, to say the least: 1. single tap as click left mouse button works practically always 2. two finder scroll works always 3. two finder tap as click right mouse button works about 50% 4. three finder tap as click middle button works practically never. suomi On 2014-11-17 12:31, Gary Stainburn wrote: Onwards and upwards. I'm going for a micro USB WIFI adaptor to fix my wireless problem so I'm now moving onto my touchpad. The problem I have is that unlike traditional touch pads the left and right mouse buttons on this laptop are part of the touch pad itself. The problem I'm experiencing here is that when I press the lower left or lower right corner to activate the mouse buttons the mouse pointer also moves. Does anyone have any suggestions? One option for the left button is a single tap of the pad. This laptop is (unfortunately) Win8 dual boot. In Win8, if I tap the middle of the touch pad, it acts like a left button click. Is there any way to do the same in Linux - I'm using F20 with KDE. Also, on the DELL I had the following script which turned on 3-button emulation. Anyone got any suggestions how I could do this better on the HP? #!/bin/bash X='/usr/bin/xinput' for F in `$X list|grep Logitech|cut -d = -f 2|cut -c1-3` ; do $X set-prop $F "Evdev Middle Button Emulation" 1 done Gary -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Clearing the unallocated disk space
Tim: >> There have been cases of people getting refurbished drives which did >> have the previous owners data on them. Ed Greshko: > Do you have first hand knowledge of this or is this something you've > just heard about? I read about it on the internet, so it must be true... ;-) But seriously, I should have said there's been "reports" of such a thing "allegedly" happening, just to cover myself. Of course we'll never know if it's true, but I can see how it can happen by accident. All it needs is for someone dealing with a batch of drives, to accidentally skip a step in handling incoming and outgoing, and one pending drive erroneously becomes a done one. > Are *all* manufacturer's strict about how they manage it? Do some people return a drive through their dealer, rather than straight back to the manufacturer, and might a dealer not bother to properly handle it? -- tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.17.2-200.fc20.i686 #1 SMP Tue Nov 4 18:28:00 UTC 2014 i686 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
HP Envy Touchpad button problems
Onwards and upwards. I'm going for a micro USB WIFI adaptor to fix my wireless problem so I'm now moving onto my touchpad. The problem I have is that unlike traditional touch pads the left and right mouse buttons on this laptop are part of the touch pad itself. The problem I'm experiencing here is that when I press the lower left or lower right corner to activate the mouse buttons the mouse pointer also moves. Does anyone have any suggestions? One option for the left button is a single tap of the pad. This laptop is (unfortunately) Win8 dual boot. In Win8, if I tap the middle of the touch pad, it acts like a left button click. Is there any way to do the same in Linux - I'm using F20 with KDE. Also, on the DELL I had the following script which turned on 3-button emulation. Anyone got any suggestions how I could do this better on the HP? #!/bin/bash X='/usr/bin/xinput' for F in `$X list|grep Logitech|cut -d = -f 2|cut -c1-3` ; do $X set-prop $F "Evdev Middle Button Emulation" 1 done Gary -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Out of the Broadcom frying pan (DELL) to the fire (HP Envy)
On Monday 17 November 2014 10:39:20 Heinz Diehl wrote: > You could also grep for "BCM4352" in the latest kernel sourcetree. What would that give me? I'm certainly not up to kernel hacking, that's beyond my abilities. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Out of the Broadcom frying pan (DELL) to the fire (HP Envy)
On 17.11.2014, Gary Stainburn wrote: > I'll check again but I believe this is a new chipset and not yet supported You could also grep for "BCM4352" in the latest kernel sourcetree. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Out of the Broadcom frying pan (DELL) to the fire (HP Envy)
On Sunday 16 November 2014 22:03:51 jd1008 wrote: > > Gary, did you take a look at driver for all all broadcom b43xxx ??? > > http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/b43 I'll check again but I believe this is a new chipset and not yet supported -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
