moved to fedora mate
I would like to know how do I get compiz to auto start on boot -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: RFC: Multiboot Guide
On 2015-05-31 at 13:43:42 Pete Travis wrote: > Hi All, > > There's regularly questions here, and around the internet (ie > ask.fp.o) about dual booting Fedora with Windows systems, or other > Linux systems, or OSX. To address the more common questions, the > Fedora Docs team has written a Multiboot Guide[1]. > > The guide is intended to help set up a multiboot system in a > functional way, or to help get to a more functional state if needed. > For the most part, we've tried not to make it intimidatingly complex, > and I hope that it will aid you in most multibooting situations. > > As with all of Fedora's documentation, feedback from readers is > crucial to ensuring the quality of the work. Please use the guide, > and if you find questions unanswered or answers unclear, reply here > or use the 'multiboot-guide' component of the Fedora Documentation > product on https://bugzilla.redhat.com . > > [1] > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/Multiboot_Guide/index.html > Is it available in PDF form? -- Regards Erik P. Olsen -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
F21->F22 fedup on i386: no login screen
Greetings, On this Fedora release cycle, I have been hoping to use fedup rather than do a fresh install. To that end, I have three machines running F21: an x64 desktop, and two laptops - one x64 and the other i686. I began w/ the i686 (a Dell Inspiron 600M) using fedup. The process is lengthy; but it seems to be less buggy compared to the last time that I tried it (upgrading from F17 to F18, when on completion the machine was unuseable and required a fresh install). With reboot, I now have no login screen. In order to use the machine, I have to - in order to get a shell login screen. Once there, I can type startx and I get Gnome 3; alas, I'm an xFce user. I would like to be able to have my F21 environment Looking at some of the startup messages, I see Started GNOME Display Manager Starting UserManager for UID 42 Started Show Plymouth Boot Screen Started GNOME Display Manager.e" for details.t...n...nge transactions 7dfb6016c1.ks... and it stop there. Any advice as to how to proceed in order to get a login screen would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Max Pyziur p...@brama.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22 :: EFI boot :: grub2 does not find Windows 8.1 - solved
On May 31, 2015 1:53 PM, "Adrian Sevcenco" wrote: > > On 05/31/2015 10:27 PM, Pete Travis wrote: > > On 05/31/2015 01:27 AM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: > >> > >> One more clarification i would like: > >> what is the difference between the loaders?: > >> gcdx64.efi > >> grubx64.efi > >> MokManager.efi > >> shim.efi > >> shim-fedora.efi > >> > >> the shim part i know that is for secure boot (which is disabled in my case). > >> what are the others? is there a wiki page explaining this files? > >> > >> Thank you! > >> Adrian > >> > >> > >> > > > > There might be wiki pages that explain all this, but wiki pages can be > > hard to find and often get lost and unmaintained, so I wrote a guide > > instead. It doesn't explain the individual files at the moment > > (although there is some copy in the sources for it) because it's > > information that you don't really need to get the system going, and I > > didn't want to overwhelm new users. I'll look at adding the info in an > > appropriate section. > > > > Until then, grubx64.efi is the actual grub second stage binary, > > MokManager.efi is for signature management, shim is the part that is > > signed and allows SecureBoot to work. > Thanks a lot for help and info! > One more thing i would like to clarify (as i am new to EFI stuff): > is it possible to have a boot media with live isos (like an usb stick) for both > EFI and non-EFI systems? (i was wondering if just adding the /boot/efi part from > a system with a corresponding grub.conf would be enough to being bootable by both > legacy and UEFI only systems) > > Thank you! > Adrian > Yes, the Fedora install media is designed to work with both UEFI and not (as you discovered :) Installing the grub2-efi and shim packages will populate /boot/efi/ for Fedora. I think the part we might have brushed over was setting up the existing EFI System Partition in fstab and the chroot... --Pete -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: distcc only builds locally when using rpmbuild
Suvayu Ali writes: On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 03:29:29PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Suvayu Ali writes: > > >On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:24:07PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > >> > >> >> ps shows the maximum number of "/usr/bin/distcc /usr/bin/g++ [options]" > >> >> processes running locally, that I but nothing gets distributed to other > >> >> hosts. > >> > >> I've got distcc configured for 10 concurrent builds. 4 local, 6 distributed > >> to another host. I see ten distcc processes on the local machine during the > >> rpmbuild, /var/log/messages on the other host shows nothing – it logs > >distcc > >> server activity otherwise – and the local host appears to be running only > >> four concurrent compiles. > > > >Are you running under mock? Maybe chroot is preventing remote builds? > > No, this is an ordinary rpmbuild. How does rpmbulid decide how many threads to run? I think it looks at the local machine and decides. I also recall some variable called RPMBUILD_NCPU or something like that. That would explain why it only uses as many threads as the local machine can handle. Hope this helps, Sadly, no it doesn't. As I wrote above: > >> >> ps shows the maximum number of "/usr/bin/distcc /usr/bin/g++ [options]" > >> >> processes running locally, rpmbuild uses the _smp_mflags macro to pass the -j parameter to make, and I have it correctly configured to kick off ten parallel processes, to match the maximum number of ten processes distcc is configured (4 local, 6 remote). Yet, despite the fact that a manual build distributes the compiles correctly, with rpmbuild distcc throttles the number of concurrent parallel jobs that it kicks off to four, and runs them locally. pgphLnjpzVhhs.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: what replaces mplayer on F22??
On 06/01/15 07:50, Jack Craig wrote: > I am evaluating F22 on my netbook. > > I listen to a local FM radio using gnome/mplayer, eg, > > /bin/gmplayer > http://mapleton.securewmlive.internapcdn.net/live_secure_mapleton_vitalstream_com_KPIGFM2?token=D9F1726D-1517-9CCB-5160-50332B499CE7 > > what replaces gmplayer in F22 ?? gmplayer comes from rpmfusion. -- Sorta what I want to say when folks complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
what replaces mplayer on F22??
Hi All. I am evaluating F22 on my netbook. I listen to a local FM radio using gnome/mplayer, eg, /bin/gmplayer http://mapleton.securewmlive.internapcdn.net/live_secure_mapleton_vitalstream_com_KPIGFM2?token=D9F1726D-1517-9CCB-5160-50332B499CE7 what replaces gmplayer in F22 ?? TIA, jackc... -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: USB drive renamed during F21-F22 upgrade
On 06/01/15 06:27, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > Also, what's the right > way to set up automounting on a server that doesn't run a desktop > environment? When it comes to mounting external drives I always use either the UUID or LABEL. This way it matters not what HW I plug it into. -- Sorta what I want to say when folks complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: distcc only builds locally when using rpmbuild
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 03:29:29PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Suvayu Ali writes: > > >On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:24:07PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > >> > >> >> ps shows the maximum number of "/usr/bin/distcc /usr/bin/g++ [options]" > >> >> processes running locally, that I but nothing gets distributed to other > >> >> hosts. > >> > >> I've got distcc configured for 10 concurrent builds. 4 local, 6 distributed > >> to another host. I see ten distcc processes on the local machine during the > >> rpmbuild, /var/log/messages on the other host shows nothing – it logs > >distcc > >> server activity otherwise – and the local host appears to be running only > >> four concurrent compiles. > > > >Are you running under mock? Maybe chroot is preventing remote builds? > > No, this is an ordinary rpmbuild. How does rpmbulid decide how many threads to run? I think it looks at the local machine and decides. I also recall some variable called RPMBUILD_NCPU or something like that. That would explain why it only uses as many threads as the local machine can handle. Hope this helps, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
USB drive renamed during F21-F22 upgrade
It looks as though when I upgraded from F21 Server to F22 Server using fedup, the identifier for my USB attached drive in /dev/disk/by-id changed. As a result, the entry in /etc/fstab that mounted that drive failed at boot with no apparent warning. Files intended to be written to that drive went to / instead and filled the root partition. I don't recall why that disk was mounted by id in the first place, but I also don't understand why its id would change and how I should have handled that during the upgrade. Any thoughts, enlightenment, etc., appreciated. Also, what's the right way to set up automounting on a server that doesn't run a desktop environment? -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do I really prevent /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-coredump.conf
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Sun, 31 May 2015 09:51:25 -0400, Tom H wrote: >> >> Strange, Are you misnaming the file? > > I used cut&paste on the name from under /usr/lib > to make sure I didn't get it wrong :-). > > My theory is that systemd sets it manually despite > any udev rules, and the DumpCore=no setting > in /etc/systemd/system.conf is what really > turned it off (there appears to be no documentation > anywhere of what the heck DumpCore means to > systemd, but someone suggested doing it in > addition to setting kernel.core_pattern as the > last thing in /etc/sysctl.conf and one of those > two seemed to work). I've forgotten where I've read it, but "DumpCore=" in "/etc/systemd/system.conf" controls whether systemd will have a coredump or not. It has nothing to do with a coredump's name. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: ssh -X not working f22?
On 05/31/2015 03:17 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > Kevin Martin wrote: > >> On 05/28/2015 02:07 PM, Todor Petkov wrote: >>> On 28/05/2015 09:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote: clean installed f22 onto server (was f21). Now ssh -X doesn't seem to work to this server. In /etc/ssh/sshd_config I do have X11Forwarding yes and ssh -v -X doesn't give any error - just hangs. >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> what does "ssh -v" say? >> Have you "xhost +" on the receiver? >> >> Kevin > > Is xhost + long gone? Isn't it replace by xauth? > On my rawhide machine xhost + acts as it always has in the past (not to say that you shouldn't use xauth but this might be a way to see if there's an auth problem to start). Kevin -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
curl issue?
Hi Group. I've got a curl issue that I figured I'd post here as well, given that this is a slow posting day for fed! Normally, I wouldn't post non fed things here, but this is a slow day... (I've also posted this to the curl list as well..) Heck, I'd even send your fav bev if you were close by!! Got a short test that "should" work. The test is doing a curl/fetch of a page from a site that's running jscript on the back. The test has stepped through the initial pages/using Firefox/LiveHttpheaders to see what the network traffic is actually doing. This is replicated in the test curl functions. The app uses cookies/SSL, but no user/password login process.. It's actually pretty straightforward as far as I can see. However, the test is not able to generate the target page, and in fact seems to be running into a 302 somewhere. The goal is is to generate the "page" after the initial pages that has the list of the dept alphnumeric selection list. If someone can point out what I've screwed up, much obliged. #!/bin/sh -v # # test shell for wget/curl # #test umich echo "" > ole.lwp curl -vvv -A "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009061118 Fedora/3.0.11-1.fc9 Firefox/3.0.11" --cookie-jar ole.lwp --cookie ole.lwp-L "https://csprod.dsc.umich.edu/services/schedofclasses?strm=2060"; curl -vvv -A "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009061118 Fedora/3.0.11-1.fc9 Firefox/3.0.11" --cookie-jar ole.lwp --cookie ole.lwp-L "https://csprod.dsc.umich.edu/psp/csprodpa/EMPLOYEE/HRMS/c/COMMUNITY_ACCESS.M_SR_SC_CLS_SRCH.GBL"; curl -vvv -A "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009061118 Fedora/3.0.11-1.fc9 Firefox/3.0.11" --cookie-jar ole.lwp --cookie ole.lwp-L "https://csprod.dsc.umich.edu/psc/csprodpa/EMPLOYEE/HRMS/c/COMMUNITY_ACCESS.CLASS_SEARCH.GBL"; # # at this point, the test gets the actual page with the "correct data # --the idea is to then get the page that would list # the "depts... # # #exit # # this curl should get the page that has the list of the depts.. # --- THIS is not working as expected... # curl -vvv -A "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009061118 Fedora/3.0.11-1.fc9 Firefox/3.0.11" --cookie-jar ole.lwp --cookie ole.lwp -e "https://csprod.dsc.umich.edu/psc/csprodpa/EMPLOYEE/HRMS/c/COMMUNITY_ACCESS.CLASS_SEARCH.GBL"; -d "ICAJAX=1&ICNAVTYPEDROPDOWN=0&ICType=Panel&ICElementNum=0&ICStateNum=3&ICAction=CLASS_SRCH_WRK2_SSR_PB_SUBJ_SRCH%240&ICXPos=0&ICYPos=182&ResponsetoDiffFrame=-1&TargetFrameName=None&FacetPath=None&ICFocus=&ICSaveWarningFilter=0&ICChanged=-1&ICResubmit=0&ICSID=JAQZNpudU6JUmDHUTyctshyzD2bx%2Ba6C2lE%2Bmljpf1U%3D&ICActionPrompt=false&ICFind=&ICAddCount=&ICAPPCLSDATA=" -L "https://csprod.dsc.umich.edu/psc/csprodpa/EMPLOYEE/HRMS/c/COMMUNITY_ACCESS.CLASS_SEARCH.GBL"; exit The cookie/post data is generated from the livehttpheader results.. Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: ssh -X not working f22?
Kevin Martin wrote: > On 05/28/2015 02:07 PM, Todor Petkov wrote: >> On 28/05/2015 09:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote: >>> clean installed f22 onto server (was f21). Now ssh -X doesn't seem to >>> work >>> to this server. In /etc/ssh/sshd_config I do have >>> X11Forwarding yes >>> >>> and ssh -v -X doesn't give any error - just hangs. >> >> >> Hi, >> >> what does "ssh -v" say? > Have you "xhost +" on the receiver? > > Kevin Is xhost + long gone? Isn't it replace by xauth? -- Those who fail to understand recursion are doomed to repeat it -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Playing blu-ray disks on Fedora
Is it possible to play commercial blu-ray disks on Fedora? (I expect of course that I'd have to install some RPMFusion software, and even 'other' software off the net). If it is possible at all, are there external (USB) blu-ray drives which are better than others? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22 :: EFI boot :: grub2 does not find Windows 8.1 - solved
On 05/31/2015 10:27 PM, Pete Travis wrote: > On 05/31/2015 01:27 AM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: >> >> One more clarification i would like: >> what is the difference between the loaders?: >> gcdx64.efi >> grubx64.efi >> MokManager.efi >> shim.efi >> shim-fedora.efi >> >> the shim part i know that is for secure boot (which is disabled in my case). >> what are the others? is there a wiki page explaining this files? >> >> Thank you! >> Adrian >> >> >> > > There might be wiki pages that explain all this, but wiki pages can be > hard to find and often get lost and unmaintained, so I wrote a guide > instead. It doesn't explain the individual files at the moment > (although there is some copy in the sources for it) because it's > information that you don't really need to get the system going, and I > didn't want to overwhelm new users. I'll look at adding the info in an > appropriate section. > > Until then, grubx64.efi is the actual grub second stage binary, > MokManager.efi is for signature management, shim is the part that is > signed and allows SecureBoot to work. Thanks a lot for help and info! One more thing i would like to clarify (as i am new to EFI stuff): is it possible to have a boot media with live isos (like an usb stick) for both EFI and non-EFI systems? (i was wondering if just adding the /boot/efi part from a system with a corresponding grub.conf would be enough to being bootable by both legacy and UEFI only systems) Thank you! Adrian smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
RFC: Multiboot Guide
Hi All, There's regularly questions here, and around the internet (ie ask.fp.o) about dual booting Fedora with Windows systems, or other Linux systems, or OSX. To address the more common questions, the Fedora Docs team has written a Multiboot Guide[1]. The guide is intended to help set up a multiboot system in a functional way, or to help get to a more functional state if needed. For the most part, we've tried not to make it intimidatingly complex, and I hope that it will aid you in most multibooting situations. As with all of Fedora's documentation, feedback from readers is crucial to ensuring the quality of the work. Please use the guide, and if you find questions unanswered or answers unclear, reply here or use the 'multiboot-guide' component of the Fedora Documentation product on https://bugzilla.redhat.com . [1] http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/Multiboot_Guide/index.html -- -- Pete Travis - Fedora Docs Project Leader - 'randomuser' on freenode - immanet...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: distcc only builds locally when using rpmbuild
Suvayu Ali writes: On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:24:07PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > >> ps shows the maximum number of "/usr/bin/distcc /usr/bin/g++ [options]" > >> processes running locally, that I but nothing gets distributed to other > >> hosts. > > I've got distcc configured for 10 concurrent builds. 4 local, 6 distributed > to another host. I see ten distcc processes on the local machine during the > rpmbuild, /var/log/messages on the other host shows nothing – it logs distcc > server activity otherwise – and the local host appears to be running only > four concurrent compiles. Are you running under mock? Maybe chroot is preventing remote builds? No, this is an ordinary rpmbuild. pgp3HoAXpstGK.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: I'm shocked, shocked!
> > >> That's because you've moved from one "predictable" scheme to another... > > > > And linux really needs two predictable name schemes, because > > one is never enough :-). > > The developer who came up with the udev scheme considers it superior: > I'm shocked that the person who thought of this thinks it's better. The problem is that the vast majority of people only have one network interface and don't really care about the under-the-hood specifics. They just know that "ethernet interface" == "eth0" and has been for over 20 years now. And then some people with multiple interfaces -- such as myself -- aren't actually seeing the predictable interface naming for some reason or another. I have a Ceton InfiniTV card, and the driver exports access to it via a virtual network interface. Sometimes this interface is p5p1, and sometimes it's p5p2. This means that my firewall was occasionally working but mostly broken, and at the time the documentation was seriously lacking (trust me: I looked) and no one either here or on the MythTV list was able to troubleshoot my problem. So I had to disable my firewall in order to use the card. In the long-term this might be a good feature, but the roll-out was completely botched. If you have multiple systems for assigning interface names, DO NOT DEFAULT TO THE ONE THAT WILL BREAK MILLIONS OF LEGACY SCRIPTS AND CONFUSE EVERYONE. Use the one that's backwards compatible and works for the majority of users, and give people with complicated (i.e., multi-interface) systems the option to use the new system. My $0.02. -jdm > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/176773.html > > I say this as a happy Ubuntu user: Just be glad that Canonical didn't > think up its own scheme! :) > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22 :: EFI boot :: grub2 does not find Windows 8.1 - solved
On 05/31/2015 01:27 AM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> On 05/31/2015 03:04 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
>> Grub does not live in the MBR of a drive on UEFI systems. It's a UEFI
>> executable file on the EFI system partition. In Fedora, the relevant
>> bits come from a completely different package. You could try something
>> like this:
>>
>> - Set up a chroot with appropriate bind mounts (
>> https://fedorapeople.org/groups/docs/multiboot-guide/html/common_operations_appendix.html#common-chroot_from_live
>> )
>> - # dnf remove grub
>> - # dnf install grub2-efi shim
>> - Create an efi boot entry (the one in your paste is from the live
>> image)
>>
>> https://fedorapeople.org/groups/docs/multiboot-guide/html/GRUB-reinstalling.html
>>
>> It's a somewhat complicated and involved process; if you've just
>> installed Fedora it may be easier to reinstall.
> Thanks for info! basically what i tried was what you said (with chroot and
> recreate entry with efibootmgr)
> but without that reinstall of grub2-efi and shim .. it did not worked well
> with creating the efi entry..
> so, making sure that i have a uefi only bios, i reinstalled and things worked
> out:
I wouldn't expect it to work if you skipped the step where you install
the UEFI bootloader package for Fedora. Anyway, I'm glad you were able
to get a working system.
> Generating grub configuration file ...
> Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64
> Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64.img
> Found Windows Boot Manager on /dev/sda2@/EFI/Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi
>
> [root@x360 fedora]# efibootmgr -v
> BootCurrent: 0001
> Timeout: 5 seconds
> BootOrder: 0001,3001,0002,2001,2002,2004
> Boot0001* Fedora
> HD(2,c8800,82000,f5495ca8-ccea-4573-afe6-ec42fb4cdb01)File(\EFI\fedora\shim.efi)
> Boot0002* Windows Boot Manager
> HD(2,c8800,82000,f5495ca8-ccea-4573-afe6-ec42fb4cdb01)File(\EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi)WINDOWS.x...B.C.D.O.B.J.E.C.T.=.{.9.d.e.a.8.6.2.c.-.5.c.d.d.-.4.e.7.0.-.a.c.c.1.-.f.3.2.b.3.4.4.d.4.7.9.5.}...e
> Boot2001* EFI USB DeviceRC
> Boot3001* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State DiskRC
>
> One more clarification i would like:
> what is the difference between the loaders?:
> gcdx64.efi
> grubx64.efi
> MokManager.efi
> shim.efi
> shim-fedora.efi
>
> the shim part i know that is for secure boot (which is disabled in my case).
> what are the others? is there a wiki page explaining this files?
>
> Thank you!
> Adrian
>
>
>
There might be wiki pages that explain all this, but wiki pages can be
hard to find and often get lost and unmaintained, so I wrote a guide
instead. It doesn't explain the individual files at the moment
(although there is some copy in the sources for it) because it's
information that you don't really need to get the system going, and I
didn't want to overwhelm new users. I'll look at adding the info in an
appropriate section.
Until then, grubx64.efi is the actual grub second stage binary,
MokManager.efi is for signature management, shim is the part that is
signed and allows SecureBoot to work.
--
-- Pete
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: distcc only builds locally when using rpmbuild
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:24:07PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > >> ps shows the maximum number of "/usr/bin/distcc /usr/bin/g++ [options]" > >> processes running locally, that I but nothing gets distributed to other > >> hosts. > > I've got distcc configured for 10 concurrent builds. 4 local, 6 distributed > to another host. I see ten distcc processes on the local machine during the > rpmbuild, /var/log/messages on the other host shows nothing – it logs distcc > server activity otherwise – and the local host appears to be running only > four concurrent compiles. Are you running under mock? Maybe chroot is preventing remote builds? -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: I'm shocked, shocked!
On 31/05/15 02:29 PM, Harish Phulara wrote: > How to unsubscribe.? > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: I'm shocked, shocked!
How to unsubscribe.? Regards, Harish Phulara On 31 May 2015 at 19:55, Tom H wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Tom Horsley > wrote: > > On Sun, 31 May 2015 09:23:15 -0400, Tom H wrote: > >> > >> That's because you've moved from one "predictable" scheme to another... > > > > And linux really needs two predictable name schemes, because > > one is never enough :-). > > The developer who came up with the udev scheme considers it superior: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/176773.html > > I say this as a happy Ubuntu user: Just be glad that Canonical didn't > think up its own scheme! :) > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: distcc only builds locally when using rpmbuild
Kevin Cummings writes: As I recall, distcc involves running distcc instead of gcc. Do the RPM builds somehow override which compiler get used to use the standard gcc compiler instead of distcc? Perhaps through an environment variable in the build script? As I've explained in the paragraph you immediately quoted afterwards, during rpmbuild "ps" shows distcc getting invoked. So, distcc is being invoked from rpm. Except that it's not distributing the builds: > ps shows the maximum number of "/usr/bin/distcc /usr/bin/g++ [options]" > processes running locally, that I but nothing gets distributed to other > hosts. I've got distcc configured for 10 concurrent builds. 4 local, 6 distributed to another host. I see ten distcc processes on the local machine during the rpmbuild, /var/log/messages on the other host shows nothing – it logs distcc server activity otherwise – and the local host appears to be running only four concurrent compiles. pgpfbdlyff0eN.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: distcc only builds locally when using rpmbuild
On 05/31/2015 08:12 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > I've got distcc working correctly, when I run a build myself. I see the > build jobs getting distributed just fine. > > However, when I use rpmbuild, all builds appear to be running locally. As I recall, distcc involves running distcc instead of gcc. Do the RPM builds somehow override which compiler get used to use the standard gcc compiler instead of distcc? Perhaps through an environment variable in the build script? > ps shows the maximum number of "/usr/bin/distcc /usr/bin/g++ [options]" > processes running locally, that I but nothing gets distributed to other > hosts. > I've got %_smp_mflags set correctly to the number of build jobs that can > run in parallel, to the sum total of jobs that can be distributed via > /etc/distcc/hosts. Counting the number of distcc processes, I see that > the right number of jobs have started, but only the local build jobs are > running, and nothing gets distributed. > There must me something in the environment that's doing this, because > when I make the build myself, it works correctly. -- Kevin J. Cummings kjch...@verizon.net cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us Registered Linux User #1232 (http://www.linuxcounter.net/) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: I'm shocked, shocked!
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Sun, 31 May 2015 09:23:15 -0400, Tom H wrote: >> >> That's because you've moved from one "predictable" scheme to another... > > And linux really needs two predictable name schemes, because > one is never enough :-). The developer who came up with the udev scheme considers it superior: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/176773.html I say this as a happy Ubuntu user: Just be glad that Canonical didn't think up its own scheme! :) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do I really prevent /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-coredump.conf
On Sun, 31 May 2015 09:51:25 -0400 Tom H wrote: > Strange, Are you misnaming the file? I used cut&paste on the name from under /usr/lib to make sure I didn't get it wrong :-). My theory is that systemd sets it manually despite any udev rules, and the DumpCore=no setting in /etc/systemd/system.conf is what really turned it off (there appears to be no documentation anywhere of what the heck DumpCore means to systemd, but someone suggested doing it in addition to setting kernel.core_pattern as the last thing in /etc/sysctl.conf and one of those two seemed to work). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do I really prevent /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-coredump.conf
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Sun, 31 May 2015 07:17:49 -0400, Tom H wrote: >> >> While it's true that you usually override a sysctl value with a >> variable=value pair, symlinking a conf file in "/etc/sysctl.d/" to >> "/dev/null" overrides a conf file with the same name in >> "/usr/lib/sysctl.d/" (I've just tried it) in the same way that >> symlinks to "/dev/null" in "/etc/systemd/system/", >> "/etc/systemd/network/", and "/etc/udev/rules.d/" override same-named >> files in their corresponding libdir. > > I tried it also, and it had no effect for me, the kernel core name > file was still the screwy one systemd creates. Strange, Are you misnaming the file? I can override a setting in "/usr/lib/sysctl.d/" using a same-named file in "/etc/sysctl.d/" either by setting the variable to a different value or by symlinking the file to "/dev/null". Furthermore, from "man sysctl.d": If the administrator wants to disable a configuration file supplied by the vendor, the recommended way is to place a symlink to /dev/null in the configuration directory in /etc/, with the same filename as the vendor configuration file. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: I'm shocked, shocked!
On Sun, 31 May 2015 09:23:15 -0400 Tom H wrote: > That's because you've moved from one "predictable" scheme to another... And linux really needs two predictable name schemes, because one is never enough :-). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: I'm shocked, shocked!
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > > To see that the "predictable" network name for my > one and only ethernet port has changed once again. > On fedora 22 eno1 is what used to be em1. That's because you've moved from one "predictable" scheme to another... em1 is a name assigned by biosdevname where "em" stands for "embedded" (although I've seen an "ethernet on motherboard" explanation) and the generic name is "em". The other biosdevname option is "pp where the first "p" stands for "pci". eno1 is a name assigned by udev where "en" stands for ethernet and "o" for onboard. From "man systemd.link": NamePolicy= An ordered, space-separated list of policies by which the interface name should be set. "NamePolicy" may be disabled by specifying "net.ifnames=0" on the kernel command line. Each of the policies may fail, and the first successful one is used. The name is not set directly, but is exported to udev as the property "ID_NET_NAME", which is, by default, used by a udev rule to set "NAME". If the name has already been set by userspace, no renaming is performed. The available policies are: "kernel" If the kernel claims that the name it has set for a device is predictable, then no renaming is performed. "database" The name is set based on entries in the udev's Hardware Database with the key "ID_NET_NAME_FROM_DATABASE". "onboard" The name is set based on information given by the firmware for on-board devices, as exported by the udev property "ID_NET_NAME_ONBOARD". "slot" The name is set based on information given by the firmware for hot-plug devices, as exported by the udev property "ID_NET_NAME_SLOT". "path" The name is set based on the device's physical location, as exported by the udev property "ID_NET_NAME_PATH". "mac" The name is set based on the device's persistent MAC address, as exported by the udev property "ID_NET_NAME_MAC". AFAIR, there are more naming options, but these are the ones that I do remember: If a card has an ID_NET_NAME_ONBOARD value, it'll be called "eno". If a card doesn't have an ID_NET_NAME_ONBOARD value but has an ID_NET_NAME_SLOT value, it'll be called "ens". If a card doesn't have an ID_NET_NAME_ONBOARD value or an ID_NET_NAME_SLOT value but has an ID_NET_NAME_PATH value, it'll be called "enps". If a card doesn't have an ID_NET_NAME_ONBOARD value, an ID_NET_NAME_SLOT value, or an ID_NET_NAME_PATH value, its ID_NET_NAME_MAC value (its MAC address) will be used and it'll be called "enx". A wifi card's name starts with "wl". You can disable the udev ifnames by: 1) Setting "net.ifnames=0" on the kernel cmdline 2) Overriding "/usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link" # cp /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link /etc/systemd/network/99-default.link # vi /etc/systemd/network/99-default.link NamePolicy=kernel MACAddressPolicy=persistent 3) Masking "/usr/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules" # rm /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules (if it exists) # ln -s /dev/null /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules 4) Overriding "/usr/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules" (and "/etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules", if it exists) # vi /etc/udev/rules.d/-.rules [rules similar to the ones that were previously auto-generated as 70-persistent-net.rules] -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Nautilus not show "Move to trash" in some case
Il giorno dom, 31/05/2015 alle 14.20 +0200, Dario Lesca ha scritto: > Into nautilus / preferences / behavior / Trash, the flag "Include a > Delete command that bypasses Trash" is gone away (why?). > If the file to remove is into a folder into filesyste without usertra > sh, the right click on this file do not show "Move to trash". See attach for example. Nautilus (file) is last version, 3.16.2 -- Dario Lesca (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 22 con Gnome 3.16)-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Nautilus not show "Move to trash" in some case
Stop fixing what is not broken. Into nautilus / preferences / behavior / Trash, the flag "Include a Delete command that bypasses Trash" is gone away (why?). If the file to remove is into a folder into filesyste without user trash, the right click on this file do not show "Move to trash". So, in this case, it's not possible to remove the file or folder. Workaround solution is using Caja (Great file manager!), thunar or open a termina and delete the file/folder. Some suggest? Thanks -- Dario Lesca (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 22 con Gnome 3.16) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do I really prevent /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-coredump.conf
On Sun, 31 May 2015 07:17:49 -0400 Tom H wrote: > While it's true that you usually override a sysctl value with a > variable=value pair, symlinking a conf file in "/etc/sysctl.d/" to > "/dev/null" overrides a conf file with the same name in > "/usr/lib/sysctl.d/" (I've just tried it) in the same way that > symlinks to "/dev/null" in "/etc/systemd/system/", > "/etc/systemd/network/", and "/etc/udev/rues.d/" override same-named > files in their corresponding libdir. I tried it also, and it had no effect for me, the kernel core name file was still the screwy one systemd creates. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
distcc only builds locally when using rpmbuild
I've got distcc working correctly, when I run a build myself. I see the build jobs getting distributed just fine. However, when I use rpmbuild, all builds appear to be running locally. ps shows the maximum number of "/usr/bin/distcc /usr/bin/g++ [options]" processes running locally, that I but nothing gets distributed to other hosts. I've got %_smp_mflags set correctly to the number of build jobs that can run in parallel, to the sum total of jobs that can be distributed via /etc/distcc/hosts. Counting the number of distcc processes, I see that the right number of jobs have started, but only the local build jobs are running, and nothing gets distributed. There must me something in the environment that's doing this, because when I make the build myself, it works correctly. pgpUZIWFoqszY.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do I really prevent /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-coredump.conf
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Alchemist wrote: > 2015-05-29 16:23 GMT+03:00 Tom H : >> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Tom Horsley >> wrote: >>> >>> In some message a while back the claim was made that >>> creating a /etc/sysctl.d/50-coredump.conf that was >>> empty would override the systemd installed >>> /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-coredump.conf, but I can >>> state positively that doesn't work, the systemd >>> setting is still in force. >>> >>> What does work is (as root): >>> >>> rm -f /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-coredump.conf >>> >>> but that file will come back if there is a systemd >>> update. >>> >>> So is there really a way to get the default >>> kernel core file pattern to stick around even >>> with systemd updates? >> >> How about trying a symlink of "/etc/sysctl.d/50-coredump.conf" to >> "/dev/null", systemctl-mask-style? > > Don't use empty or nulled files. Sysctl variable names must be the same, to > override variable=value stored in /usr/lib/sysctl.d/*. I did say "try." While it's true that you usually override a sysctl value with a variable=value pair, symlinking a conf file in "/etc/sysctl.d/" to "/dev/null" overrides a conf file with the same name in "/usr/lib/sysctl.d/" (I've just tried it) in the same way that symlinks to "/dev/null" in "/etc/systemd/system/", "/etc/systemd/network/", and "/etc/udev/rues.d/" override same-named files in their corresponding libdir. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: auditd
On Sat, 2015-05-30 at 19:41 -0600, jd1008 wrote: > > On 05/30/2015 06:51 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 05/30/15 10:40, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > is pretty effective. Primary downside: if you have SELinux > > > violations, > > > you don't get (as close to as SELinux gets) user-friendly > > > explanations. > > Of course the biggest downside to turning off auditd, and > > potentially other logging services, is that when error/problems > > exist you'll not be notified nor will you have a record of what > > went wrong. So, I can easily see situations where things are > > failing but there is no log or evidence as to why. Thus, making > > troubleshooting nearly impossible. > > > I understand. > It's just that I want to reduce the number of tasks running in level > 5 > to a minimum. > I am getting rather short on ram and cpu bandwidths because some > programs that I use to edit large mp4 or webm or avi files need as > much > ram and cpu bandwidth as they can get. > > One might argue that I would not gain much in that regard. > But I think I should be able to gain some tha will reduce the > total time it takes to do the mods to those media files. Which desktop are you using? That probably has more effect on RAM usage than turning off auditing. As for cpu load, I suspect that audit processes have a minimal effect unless you have evidence to the contrary. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: I'm shocked, shocked!
Allegedly, on or about 30 May 2015, Tom Horsley sent: > To see that the "predictable" network name for my > one and only ethernet port has changed once again. > On fedora 22 eno1 is what used to be em1. Yes, I'm sick of that crap, too. eth0 was the ethernet port on all my computers, until that happened. Now each computer has a different name for its ethernet port, thanks do different hardware in each. And some have two wildly different names for ethernet ports in the same box. And now, somehow, I'm expected to know which is which. As if I can remember what hardware is in which box, in which board?! In most cases, in the past, those of us who had more than one ethernet port, simply configured eth0 to the specific MAC built into it, and likewise with eth1, etc. We only had to do it once per installation. Only a few people were lumbered with random-MAC ethernet ports, and quite frankly, I'm sure they're still lumbered with the current system. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. This email brought to you by potato omelates: Boil three medium potatoes for ten minutes, then smash them (that's mash them only once, so they're chunky). Stir up four eggs, like you're going to make scrambled eggs. Mix potatoes and eggs together. Melt a large lump of butter in a frypan. Slowly fry small helpings until golden brown. Replenish the butter as you go along, don't burn the butter. Tip out any butter that's starting to burn, as you go along. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22 :: EFI boot :: grub2 does not find Windows 8.1 - solved
On 05/31/2015 03:04 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
> Grub does not live in the MBR of a drive on UEFI systems. It's a UEFI
> executable file on the EFI system partition. In Fedora, the relevant
> bits come from a completely different package. You could try something
> like this:
>
> - Set up a chroot with appropriate bind mounts (
> https://fedorapeople.org/groups/docs/multiboot-guide/html/common_operations_appendix.html#common-chroot_from_live
> )
> - # dnf remove grub
> - # dnf install grub2-efi shim
> - Create an efi boot entry (the one in your paste is from the live
> image)
>
> https://fedorapeople.org/groups/docs/multiboot-guide/html/GRUB-reinstalling.html
>
> It's a somewhat complicated and involved process; if you've just
> installed Fedora it may be easier to reinstall.
Thanks for info! basically what i tried was what you said (with chroot and
recreate entry with efibootmgr)
but without that reinstall of grub2-efi and shim .. it did not worked well with
creating the efi entry..
so, making sure that i have a uefi only bios, i reinstalled and things worked
out:
Generating grub configuration file ...
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64
Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64.img
Found Windows Boot Manager on /dev/sda2@/EFI/Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi
[root@x360 fedora]# efibootmgr -v
BootCurrent: 0001
Timeout: 5 seconds
BootOrder: 0001,3001,0002,2001,2002,2004
Boot0001* Fedora
HD(2,c8800,82000,f5495ca8-ccea-4573-afe6-ec42fb4cdb01)File(\EFI\fedora\shim.efi)
Boot0002* Windows Boot Manager
HD(2,c8800,82000,f5495ca8-ccea-4573-afe6-ec42fb4cdb01)File(\EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi)WINDOWS.x...B.C.D.O.B.J.E.C.T.=.{.9.d.e.a.8.6.2.c.-.5.c.d.d.-.4.e.7.0.-.a.c.c.1.-.f.3.2.b.3.4.4.d.4.7.9.5.}...e
Boot2001* EFI USB DeviceRC
Boot3001* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State DiskRC
One more clarification i would like:
what is the difference between the loaders?:
gcdx64.efi
grubx64.efi
MokManager.efi
shim.efi
shim-fedora.efi
the shim part i know that is for secure boot (which is disabled in my case).
what are the others? is there a wiki page explaining this files?
Thank you!
Adrian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
