Re: Clone a system to an encrypted drive
Thank you! (The rsync flags that Anaconda uses is definitely a plus) On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, 23:58 Chris Murphy wrote: > The gist is: > > cryptsetup, you can use the defaults which uses aes-xts-plain64 with a > 256 bit key. I like the -y and -v options. > > You'll need to create or modify the /etc/crypttab file, which takes the > form of: > none > > The name can be anything but I do it the anaconda way which is > luks- and then is the LUKS UUID reported by blkid. > > Use that same UUID in the form rd.luks=UUID= as a boot parameter > in /etc/default/grub and then grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg > or > grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg > as the case may be if you have a UEFI system > > And finally, the fstab entry is created the same as if it weren't > encrypted, you still use the fs volume UUID as reported by blkid. > > And since i have it handy, the rsync command anaconda uses is: > > rsync -pogAXtlHrDx > > Chris Murphy > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Clone a system to an encrypted drive
The gist is: cryptsetup, you can use the defaults which uses aes-xts-plain64 with a 256 bit key. I like the -y and -v options. You'll need to create or modify the /etc/crypttab file, which takes the form of: none The name can be anything but I do it the anaconda way which is luks- and then is the LUKS UUID reported by blkid. Use that same UUID in the form rd.luks=UUID= as a boot parameter in /etc/default/grub and then grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg or grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg as the case may be if you have a UEFI system And finally, the fstab entry is created the same as if it weren't encrypted, you still use the fs volume UUID as reported by blkid. And since i have it handy, the rsync command anaconda uses is: rsync -pogAXtlHrDx Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Clone a system to an encrypted drive
Look Arch Linux's wiki for LUKS / dm-crypt, you will probably need to read some documentation but in an hour or less you should be able to create an encrypted partition, an encrypted swap, learn how to unlock it manually or via cryptab/cryptsecrets and so on. GL. On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, 22:21 Chris Adams wrote: > I have a running Fedora 21 system. I would like to make a backup of it > to a USB drive, a clone that can be booted. I know how to do all the > "normal" stuff (partition, LVM, mkfs, rsync, and GRUB), but I'd like the > USB drive to be encrypted, and I don't know how to set that up manually > (I haven't messed with encrypted filesystems under Linux before). > > The system I'm backing is also headless, so no GUI tools. > > Pointers, tips, suggestions? Thanks. > -- > Chris Adams > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Clone a system to an encrypted drive
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 20:21:25 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: I have a running Fedora 21 system. I would like to make a backup of it to a USB drive, a clone that can be booted. I know how to do all the "normal" stuff (partition, LVM, mkfs, rsync, and GRUB), but I'd like the USB drive to be encrypted, and I don't know how to set that up manually (I haven't messed with encrypted filesystems under Linux before). The system I'm backing is also headless, so no GUI tools. Pointers, tips, suggestions? Thanks. cryptsetup is the program used to create LUKS devices. I run LUKS on top of separate raid arrays, but you might also want to have just one LUKS device and run LVM on top of that. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Clone a system to an encrypted drive
I have a running Fedora 21 system. I would like to make a backup of it to a USB drive, a clone that can be booted. I know how to do all the "normal" stuff (partition, LVM, mkfs, rsync, and GRUB), but I'd like the USB drive to be encrypted, and I don't know how to set that up manually (I haven't messed with encrypted filesystems under Linux before). The system I'm backing is also headless, so no GUI tools. Pointers, tips, suggestions? Thanks. -- Chris Adams -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild error in F22 (looking for desktop file)
Michael, > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GSettings_Schema > > ? Reading this was a great help and I have been able to create a rpm (which works). Here is the rpm if someone is interested. https://streaming.stat.iastate.edu/~stat580/fedora/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.noarch.rpm What does do not work; 1. Transparency -- I can not get it to do anything: perhaps something is missing. (Perhaps some error in my packaging.) 2. GeoLocator also does not seem to be picking up automatically -- I had to put in my location manually. Things that will require development (and will not work with Yahoo! Weather which this application uses): 1. No "Feels Like" setting -- very useful as far as I can tell. 2. Hourly forecast (available as a popup). Hope this is helpful to someone! Best wishes, Ranjan FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 8 Dual boot lost after Fedora upgrade
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:25:32PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Fred Smith > wrote: > > > Yews, I believe that is correct. But just to save yourself some grief, make > > sure > > that ntfs-3g and ntfsprogs are installed BEFORE you do that. > > ntfs-3g is included by default in Fedora Workstation, but it's not > needed on UEFI installs for os-prober to find the Windows bootloader > because it's located on the FAT 32 EFI System partition. On BIOS > systems, the Windows bootloader is on an NTFS volume, hence the > dependency on ntfs-3g. And ntfsprogs is deprecated since Fedora 15. thanks for the clarification. -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - "For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen." - Jude 1:24,25 (niv) - -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 8 Dual boot lost after Fedora upgrade
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Fred Smith wrote: > Yews, I believe that is correct. But just to save yourself some grief, make > sure > that ntfs-3g and ntfsprogs are installed BEFORE you do that. ntfs-3g is included by default in Fedora Workstation, but it's not needed on UEFI installs for os-prober to find the Windows bootloader because it's located on the FAT 32 EFI System partition. On BIOS systems, the Windows bootloader is on an NTFS volume, hence the dependency on ntfs-3g. And ntfsprogs is deprecated since Fedora 15. -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 8 Dual boot lost after Fedora upgrade
On Wednesday 15 July 2015 16:23:54 Chris Murphy wrote: > > grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg > > efibootmgr -v## to list the boots > efibootmgr -o ,0001,0002etc ## to explicitly set the order, Chris, your advice has been priceless and spot on. I now have a laptop that boots into the GRUB memu, and have working Fedora and Windows options. All's right with the world - at least until I try to upgrade Fedora again. Gary -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 8 Dual boot lost after Fedora upgrade
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 04:09:29PM +0100, Gary Stainburn wrote: > On Wednesday 15 July 2015 13:36:53 Chris Murphy wrote: > > ++ GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=true > > > > This is why it's not making the Windows entry. I mentioned it previously. > > So comment out that line in /etc/default/grub and then rerun grub2-mkconfig > > -o ... to make a new grub.cfg in the proper location. > > > > Chris Murphy > > Hi Chris, > > Sorry I missed that. It's now included a chain loader entry for Windows, > included below. > > As you suggested, I tried looking at the man page for grub2-mkconfig. > Unfortunately, I don't have that man page installed so I tried googling it. > The search pointed me to > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2 > > which has only succeeded in confusing me more. Based on the generated config > file below, am I right in thinking that all I need to do to get GRUB to work > and to allow me to boot windows is to: > > grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg > > Assuming this is correct, I still need to work out how to get the laptop to > boot GRUB instead of the Windows OS Boot loader. Yews, I believe that is correct. But just to save yourself some grief, make sure that ntfs-3g and ntfsprogs are installed BEFORE you do that. -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven." -- Matthew 7:21 (niv) - -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild error in F22 (looking for desktop file)
> Are you aware of > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GSettings_Schema > > ? Thanks, no. I will take a look. > > > I guess trying to package this was not a very smart idea: issues here are > > getting to be beyond me. > > > > Have you ever before installed this program as superuser root? When > packaging it, one may need to duplicate things it does in its make > install target. No. Sorry. I have not actually made it run before packaging. I am not sure how one runs a python application such as this. Ranjan Can't remember your password? Do you need a strong and secure password? Use Password manager! It stores your passwords & protects your account. Check it out at http://mysecurelogon.com/password-manager -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild error in F22 (looking for desktop file)
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:41:18 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > However, there appears to be some errors in the actual application. Upon > installing, I get: > > > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon_lib/Builder.py:81: Warning: The > property GtkWindow:has-resize-grip is deprecated and shouldn't be used > anymore. It will be removed in a future version. > Gtk.Builder.add_from_file(self, filename) > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gi/overrides/__init__.py:313: Warning: The > property GSettings:schema is deprecated and shouldn't be used anymore. It > will be removed in a future version. > return super_init_func(self, **new_kwargs) > > (typhoon:1076): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: Settings schema 'net.launchpad.typhoon' is > not installed > Are you aware of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GSettings_Schema ? > I guess trying to package this was not a very smart idea: issues here are > getting to be beyond me. > Have you ever before installed this program as superuser root? When packaging it, one may need to duplicate things it does in its make install target. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 8 Dual boot lost after Fedora upgrade
And just FYI the Fedora NVRAM entry (revealed with efibootmgr -v) doesn't point to GRUB, it points to shim.efi. That's normal. Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 8 Dual boot lost after Fedora upgrade
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Gary Stainburn
wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 July 2015 13:36:53 Chris Murphy wrote:
>> ++ GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=true
>>
>> This is why it's not making the Windows entry. I mentioned it previously.
>> So comment out that line in /etc/default/grub and then rerun grub2-mkconfig
>> -o ... to make a new grub.cfg in the proper location.
>>
>> Chris Murphy
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Sorry I missed that. It's now included a chain loader entry for Windows,
> included below.
>
> As you suggested, I tried looking at the man page for grub2-mkconfig.
> Unfortunately, I don't have that man page installed so I tried googling it.
> The search pointed me to
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2
>
> which has only succeeded in confusing me more. Based on the generated config
> file below, am I right in thinking that all I need to do to get GRUB to work
> and to allow me to boot windows is to:
>
> grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
That's for BIOS systems. Fedora's GRUB does a screwy thing on UEFI
putting it on the EFI System partition, so you have to do:
grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg
> Assuming this is correct, I still need to work out how to get the laptop to
> boot GRUB instead of the Windows OS Boot loader.
efibootmgr -v## to list the boots
efibootmgr -o ,0001,0002etc ## to explicitly set the order,
use the boot numbers separated by commas.
Or do it in the firmware configuration/setup UI.
> ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/30_os-prober ###
> menuentry 'Windows Boot Manager' {
> chainloader /EFI/Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi
> boot
> }
> ### END /etc/grub.d/30_os-prober ###
Yeah that's very clean. There's no set-root or search root or search
uuid or anything because the Windows bootloader is on the ESP, which
is also the GRUB root, and therefore there's no need to change the
root or search for a uuid to find the Windows bootloader. The path is
relative to the GRUB root.
--
Chris Murphy
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 8 Dual boot lost after Fedora upgrade
On Wednesday 15 July 2015 13:36:53 Chris Murphy wrote:
> ++ GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=true
>
> This is why it's not making the Windows entry. I mentioned it previously.
> So comment out that line in /etc/default/grub and then rerun grub2-mkconfig
> -o ... to make a new grub.cfg in the proper location.
>
> Chris Murphy
Hi Chris,
Sorry I missed that. It's now included a chain loader entry for Windows,
included below.
As you suggested, I tried looking at the man page for grub2-mkconfig.
Unfortunately, I don't have that man page installed so I tried googling it.
The search pointed me to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2
which has only succeeded in confusing me more. Based on the generated config
file below, am I right in thinking that all I need to do to get GRUB to work
and to allow me to boot windows is to:
grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
Assuming this is correct, I still need to work out how to get the laptop to
boot GRUB instead of the Windows OS Boot loader.
#
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE
#
# It is automatically generated by grub2-mkconfig using templates
# from /etc/grub.d and settings from /etc/default/grub
#
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/00_header ###
if [ -s $prefix/grubenv ]; then
load_env
fi
if [ "${next_entry}" ] ; then
set default="${next_entry}"
set next_entry=
save_env next_entry
set boot_once=true
else
set default="${saved_entry}"
fi
if [ x"${feature_menuentry_id}" = xy ]; then
menuentry_id_option="--id"
else
menuentry_id_option=""
fi
export menuentry_id_option
if [ "${prev_saved_entry}" ]; then
set saved_entry="${prev_saved_entry}"
save_env saved_entry
set prev_saved_entry=
save_env prev_saved_entry
set boot_once=true
fi
function savedefault {
if [ -z "${boot_once}" ]; then
saved_entry="${chosen}"
save_env saved_entry
fi
}
function load_video {
if [ x$feature_all_video_module = xy ]; then
insmod all_video
else
insmod efi_gop
insmod efi_uga
insmod ieee1275_fb
insmod vbe
insmod vga
insmod video_bochs
insmod video_cirrus
fi
}
terminal_output console
set timeout=5
### END /etc/grub.d/00_header ###
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/10_linux ###
menuentry 'Fedora, with Linux 3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64' --class fedora --class
gnu-linux --class gnu --class os --unrestricted
$menuentry_id_option
'gnulinux-3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64-advanced-7bd8b8aa-711f-4195-b6a9-27d1879e3079'
{
load_video
set gfxpayload=keep
insmod gzio
insmod part_gpt
insmod ext2
set root='hd0,gpt3'
if [ x$feature_platform_search_hint = xy ]; then
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root --hint-bios=hd0,gpt3
--hint-efi=hd0,gpt3 --hint-baremetal=ahci0,gpt3
c0c76610-4d06-4aa7-a0a7-4345a1e74a7b
else
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root
c0c76610-4d06-4aa7-a0a7-4345a1e74a7b
fi
linuxefi /vmlinuz-3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64 root=/dev/mapper/fedora-root
ro
rd.lvm.lv=fedora/swap vconsole.font=latarcyrheb-sun16 rd.lvm.lv=fedora/root
rhgb quiet
initrdefi /initramfs-3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64.img
}
menuentry 'Fedora, with Linux 3.19.5-100.fc20.x86_64' --class fedora --class
gnu-linux --class gnu --class os --unrestricted
$menuentry_id_option
'gnulinux-3.19.5-100.fc20.x86_64-advanced-7bd8b8aa-711f-4195-b6a9-27d1879e3079'
{
load_video
set gfxpayload=keep
insmod gzio
insmod part_gpt
insmod ext2
set root='hd0,gpt3'
if [ x$feature_platform_search_hint = xy ]; then
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root --hint-bios=hd0,gpt3
--hint-efi=hd0,gpt3 --hint-baremetal=ahci0,gpt3
c0c76610-4d06-4aa7-a0a7-4345a1e74a7b
else
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root
c0c76610-4d06-4aa7-a0a7-4345a1e74a7b
fi
linuxefi /vmlinuz-3.19.5-100.fc20.x86_64 root=/dev/mapper/fedora-root
ro
rd.lvm.lv=fedora/swap vconsole.font=latarcyrheb-sun16 rd.lvm.lv=fedora/root
rhgb quiet
initrdefi /initramfs-3.19.5-100.fc20.x86_64.img
}
menuentry 'Fedora, with Linux 3.19.4-100.fc20.x86_64' --class fedora --class
gnu-linux --class gnu --class os --unrestricted
$menuentry_id_option
'gnulinux-3.19.4-100.fc20.x86_64-advanced-7bd8b8aa-711f-4195-b6a9-27d1879e3079'
{
load_video
set gfxpayload=keep
insmod gzio
insmod part_gpt
insmod ext2
set root='hd0,gpt3'
if [ x$feature_platform_search_hint = xy ]; then
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root --hint-bios=hd0,gpt3
--hint-efi=hd0,gpt3 --hint-baremetal=ahci0,gpt3
c0c76610-4d06-4aa7-a0a7-4345a1e74a7b
else
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root
c0c76610-4d06-4aa7-a0a7-4345a1e74a7b
fi
linuxefi /vmlinuz-3.19.4-100.fc20.x86_64 root=/dev/mapper/fedora-root
ro
rd.lvm.lv=fedora/swap vconsole.font=latarcyrheb-sun16 rd.lvm.lv=fedora/root
rhgb quiet
initrdefi /initramfs-3.19.4-100.fc20.x86_64.img
}
menuentry 'Fedora, with Linu
Re: rpmbuild error in F22 (looking for desktop file)
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:01:25 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:59:39 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > So, now with this modified spec file, I am in this predicament now (files > > not packaged but installed) -- how do I get rid of this problem? > > > > > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > > Well, obviously you need to edit the %files section of the spec file > and add as many entries as necessary to include (or exclude) in the > package what is found in the buildroot. That's: > > http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-files-list.html > and > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership > -- OK, thanks! Your response made sense to me, and I went back and looked at what I have also done in the past. (I never understood it at that point, but now I have a better sense of what it was doing.) So, now things work (and here is the spec file): $ fpaste typhoon.spec Uploading (1.5KiB)... http://ur1.ca/n4qq5 -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/244635/70759143 However, there appears to be some errors in the actual application. Upon installing, I get: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon_lib/Builder.py:81: Warning: The property GtkWindow:has-resize-grip is deprecated and shouldn't be used anymore. It will be removed in a future version. Gtk.Builder.add_from_file(self, filename) /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gi/overrides/__init__.py:313: Warning: The property GSettings:schema is deprecated and shouldn't be used anymore. It will be removed in a future version. return super_init_func(self, **new_kwargs) (typhoon:1076): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: Settings schema 'net.launchpad.typhoon' is not installed The last is perhaps a consequence of this application having been written in/for Ubuntu. Here is the offending file: $ more /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/net.launchpad.typhoon.gschema.xml '' Sample setting Longer description of this sample setting. Talk about allowe d values and what it does. But how do I get around it? Is there a similar schemas for Fedora also? I guess trying to package this was not a very smart idea: issues here are getting to be beyond me. Many thanks and best wishes, Ranjan FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: thunderbird+enigmail issue on fedora 21
On 07/15/15 21:40, François Patte wrote: > Le 15/07/2015 15:32, Paul Cartwright a écrit : >> On 07/15/2015 09:24 AM, François Patte wrote: >>> I have an issue with thunderbird+enigmail on fedora 21: TB is unable >>> to send a signed message and enigmail complains that it cannot find >>> the gpg key. >>> >>> Every time pinentry-curses is stuck and uses 100% of CPU. >>> >>> Using Enigmail>Manage keys shows that the key is there and valid... >>> >>> What's wrong? >>> >>> Thank you. >> is the key assigned to the right user that is sending the email?? > Of course! And I have absolutely no problem to use enigmail (and TB) on > a debian install (with same /home, and thus same account for me...) > Are you saying you're dual booting and using the same home directory in both? Has this worked before, or a new problem? -- If I wanted a blog or social media I'd go elsewhere -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild error in F22 (looking for desktop file)
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:59:39 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > So, now with this modified spec file, I am in this predicament now (files not > packaged but installed) -- how do I get rid of this problem? > > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: Well, obviously you need to edit the %files section of the spec file and add as many entries as necessary to include (or exclude) in the package what is found in the buildroot. That's: http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-files-list.html and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: thunderbird+enigmail issue on fedora 21
Le 15/07/2015 15:32, Paul Cartwright a écrit : > On 07/15/2015 09:24 AM, François Patte wrote: >> I have an issue with thunderbird+enigmail on fedora 21: TB is unable >> to send a signed message and enigmail complains that it cannot find >> the gpg key. >> >> Every time pinentry-curses is stuck and uses 100% of CPU. >> >> Using Enigmail>Manage keys shows that the key is there and valid... >> >> What's wrong? >> >> Thank you. > is the key assigned to the right user that is sending the email?? Of course! And I have absolutely no problem to use enigmail (and TB) on a debian install (with same /home, and thus same account for me...) -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: thunderbird+enigmail issue on fedora 21
On 07/15/2015 09:24 AM, François Patte wrote: > I have an issue with thunderbird+enigmail on fedora 21: TB is unable > to send a signed message and enigmail complains that it cannot find > the gpg key. > > Every time pinentry-curses is stuck and uses 100% of CPU. > > Using Enigmail>Manage keys shows that the key is there and valid... > > What's wrong? > > Thank you. is the key assigned to the right user that is sending the email?? I have a key, but I only use it on 1 email address.. -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
thunderbird+enigmail issue on fedora 21
Bonjour, I have an issue with thunderbird+enigmail on fedora 21: TB is unable to send a signed message and enigmail complains that it cannot find the gpg key. Every time pinentry-curses is stuck and uses 100% of CPU. Using Enigmail>Manage keys shows that the key is there and valid... What's wrong? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild error in F22 (looking for desktop file)
Hi,
Thanks (to Richard also)!
> Do some trouble-shooting. As a first step, forget rpmbuild. Run the
> same commands you run in %build and %install in your terminal. If
> the commands fail, you need to fix the source code and cannot blame
> rpmbuild or the spec file.
I was not familiar with setup.py files so this has been a learning experience
for me!
So the build section builds fine with no issues.
The install section installs without the error if I removed the --skip-build
(so that is what I did in my new .spec file).
> > Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X1IL6J
> > [...]
> > running install_egg_info
> > Writing
> > /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon-0.8.94-py2.7.egg-info
> > ("ERROR: Can't find",
> > '/home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/applications/typhoon.desktop')
> > [...]
>
> You may need to debug install_egg_info for this piece of software. This
> error is not a spec file error, because your spec %files section does not
> refer to this .desktop file anywhere [yet]. If the file were installed
> into the buildroot, you would see a different error (rpmbuild complaining
> about installed files not present in %files section).
So, now with this modified spec file, I am in this predicament now (files not
packaged but installed) -- how do I get rid of this problem?
Many thanks again and best wishes,
Ranjan
PS: Here is 1) the spec file and 2) the error messages:
$ fpaste typhoon.spec
Uploading (1.4KiB)...
http://ur1.ca/n4ptz -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/244574/43696498
$ rpmbuild -bb typhoon.spec
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.TXm6s4
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ rm -rf typhoon-0.8.9.4
+ /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /home/maitra/rpmbuild/SOURCES/typhoon-0.8.9.4.tar.bz2
+ /usr/bin/tar -xf -
+ STATUS=0
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd typhoon-0.8.9.4
+ /usr/bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .
+ rm -rf stapler.egg-info
+ exit 0
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3gtA9u
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd typhoon-0.8.9.4
+ /usr/bin/python setup.py build
Unable to init server: Could not connect: Connection refused
running build
running build_py
creating build
creating build/lib
creating build/lib/typhoon_lib
copying typhoon_lib/Window.py -> build/lib/typhoon_lib
copying typhoon_lib/helpers.py -> build/lib/typhoon_lib
copying typhoon_lib/Builder.py -> build/lib/typhoon_lib
copying typhoon_lib/typhoonconfig.py -> build/lib/typhoon_lib
copying typhoon_lib/__init__.py -> build/lib/typhoon_lib
creating build/lib/typhoon
copying typhoon/TyphoonWindow.py -> build/lib/typhoon
copying typhoon/__init__.py -> build/lib/typhoon
running build_scripts
creating build/scripts-2.7
copying and adjusting bin/typhoon -> build/scripts-2.7
changing mode of build/scripts-2.7/typhoon from 644 to 755
running build_i18n
intltool-update -p -g typhoon
intltool-merge -d po typhoon.desktop.in build/share/applications/typhoon.desktop
Merging translations into build/share/applications/typhoon.desktop.
running build_icons
running build_help
+ exit 0
Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1FB1JW
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ '[' /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64 '!=' / ']'
+ rm -rf /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64
++ dirname /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64
+ mkdir -p /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT
+ mkdir /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64
+ cd typhoon-0.8.9.4
+ rm -rf /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64
+ /usr/bin/python setup.py install -O1 --root
/home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64
Unable to init server: Could not connect: Connection refused
running install
running build
running build_py
running build_scripts
running build_i18n
intltool-update -p -g typhoon
running build_icons
running build_help
running install_lib
creating /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64
creating /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr
creating /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib
creating
/home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7
creating
/home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages
creating
/home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon_lib
copying build/lib/typhoon_lib/Window.py ->
/home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon_lib
copying build/lib/typhoon_lib/helpers.py ->
/home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon_lib
copying build/lib/typhoon_lib/Builder.py ->
/home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/li
Re: rpmbuild error in F22 (looking for desktop file)
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Ranjan Maitra < maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to make a rpm out of the following application: > > https://github.com/apandada1/typhoon > > but my spec file, created from looking at the batti.spec file looks for a > desktop file, rather than a desktop.in file. What I don't understand is > where it figures out how to look for a desktop file. Any suggestions/help? > I don't have a lot of experience with rpmbuild and spec files. > > Here is the spec file: > > $ fpaste typhoon.spec > Uploading (1.4KiB)... > http://ur1.ca/n4lhh -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/244462/14369268 > > And here is the error that I am getting: > > $rpmbuild -bb typhoon.spec > Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Mne9tW > + umask 022 > + cd /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILD > + cd /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILD > + rm -rf typhoon-0.8.9.4 > + /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /home/maitra/rpmbuild/SOURCES/typhoon-0.8.9.4.tar.bz2 > + /usr/bin/tar -xf - > + STATUS=0 > + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' > + cd typhoon-0.8.9.4 > + /usr/bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . > + rm -rf stapler.egg-info > + exit 0 > Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ZQvdSk > + umask 022 > + cd /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILD > + cd typhoon-0.8.9.4 > + /usr/bin/python setup.py build > Unable to init server: Could not connect: Connection refused > running build > running build_py > creating build > creating build/lib > creating build/lib/typhoon_lib > copying typhoon_lib/Window.py -> build/lib/typhoon_lib > copying typhoon_lib/helpers.py -> build/lib/typhoon_lib > copying typhoon_lib/Builder.py -> build/lib/typhoon_lib > copying typhoon_lib/typhoonconfig.py -> build/lib/typhoon_lib > copying typhoon_lib/__init__.py -> build/lib/typhoon_lib > creating build/lib/typhoon > copying typhoon/TyphoonWindow.py -> build/lib/typhoon > copying typhoon/__init__.py -> build/lib/typhoon > running build_scripts > creating build/scripts-2.7 > copying and adjusting bin/typhoon -> build/scripts-2.7 > changing mode of build/scripts-2.7/typhoon from 644 to 755 > running build_i18n > intltool-update -p -g typhoon > intltool-merge -d po typhoon.desktop.in > build/share/applications/typhoon.desktop > Merging translations into build/share/applications/typhoon.desktop. > Here it looks like it's taking the desktop.in file and creating the desktop file but... > running build_icons > running build_help > + exit 0 > Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X1IL6J > + umask 022 > + cd /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILD > + '[' /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64 '!=' / > ']' > + rm -rf /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64 > ++ dirname /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64 > + mkdir -p /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT > + mkdir /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64 > + cd typhoon-0.8.9.4 > + rm -rf /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64 > + /usr/bin/python setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root > /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64 > Unable to init server: Could not connect: Connection refused > running install > running install_lib > creating /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64 > creating /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr > creating > /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib > creating > /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7 > creating > /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages > creating > /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon_lib > copying build/lib/typhoon_lib/Window.py -> > /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon_lib > copying build/lib/typhoon_lib/helpers.py -> > /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon_lib > copying build/lib/typhoon_lib/Builder.py -> > /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon_lib > copying build/lib/typhoon_lib/typhoonconfig.py -> > /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon_lib > copying build/lib/typhoon_lib/__init__.py -> > /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon_lib > creating > /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon > copying build/lib/typhoon/TyphoonWindow.py -> > /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon > copying build/lib/typhoon/__init__.py -> > /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon > byte-compiling > /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.
Re: the akmod-nvidia will not work under kernel with version 4.0.7 for Fedora22
On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 20:13 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 07/13/15 20:43, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 18:38 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > On 07/13/15 17:27, Jean Jacques wrote: > > > > will not generated an module for kernel but works well under > > > > 4.0.6 > > > > > > > I see you got your answer on the rpmfusion list. > > > > > > When you have a problem with akmods you can check > > > /var/cache/akmods/akmods.log for information about what when > > > wrong. > > Same thing happened to me. I fixed it by checking the log and > > rerunning > > the modulebuild script manually. > > > > Just to add to this Check to see if you have both of these > enabled. > > [egreshko@meimei ~]$ systemctl is-enabled akmods > enabled > [egreshko@meimei ~]$ systemctl is-enabled akmods-shutdown.service > enabled > > I just tested and found that if the modules aren't built/installed > during the "dnf update" process they will get built/installed > properly during the reboot. > > Some have reported that one or both of these services weren't enabled > and this probably resulted in their failure. I have them both enabled, so there must be something else. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 8 Dual boot lost after Fedora upgrade
++ GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=true This is why it's not making the Windows entry. I mentioned it previously. So comment out that line in /etc/default/grub and then rerun grub2-mkconfig -o ... to make a new grub.cfg in the proper location. Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: the akmod-nvidia will not work under kernel with version 4.0.7 for Fedora22
On 07/13/15 20:43, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 18:38 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 07/13/15 17:27, Jean Jacques wrote: >>> will not generated an module for kernel but works well under 4.0.6 >>> >> I see you got your answer on the rpmfusion list. >> >> When you have a problem with akmods you can check >> /var/cache/akmods/akmods.log for information about what when wrong. > Same thing happened to me. I fixed it by checking the log and rerunning > the modulebuild script manually. > Just to add to this Check to see if you have both of these enabled. [egreshko@meimei ~]$ systemctl is-enabled akmods enabled [egreshko@meimei ~]$ systemctl is-enabled akmods-shutdown.service enabled I just tested and found that if the modules aren't built/installed during the "dnf update" process they will get built/installed properly during the reboot. Some have reported that one or both of these services weren't enabled and this probably resulted in their failure. -- If I wanted a blog or social media I'd go elsewhere -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Linux Foundation flings two full-time developers at OpenSSL
On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 16:40 -0600, jd1008 wrote: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/05/29/linux_foundation_core_infrast > ructure_initiative_update/ > I don't think there's any point in posting old stories from The Register (or anywhere else for that matter) unless you have something to add to them. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fwd: SHA-1 crypto hash retirement fraught with problems
On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 16:33 -0600, jd1008 wrote: > > > Forwarded Message > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/04/30/sha_2_migration_headaches/ This report is nearly 3 months old and says nothing about Fedora, or even Linux. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 8 Dual boot lost after Fedora upgrade
Right, attempt 2. As I started to say, thanks for the help Chris. The log file has been posted to: http://www.stainburn.com/grub2-mkconfig.log Now that the Windows side is working again, I'm wondering if it's worth biting thr bullet and doing a new clean Fedora install. At the moment I'm stuck with F20 as Fedup has decided that there are too many problems to allow me to upgrade to F21. Do you think that doing a clean install to F22 would fix the problems, or make them worse? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 8 Dual boot lost after Fedora upgrade
Thanks for your help Chris, this is invaluable I've posted the log to -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild error in F22 (looking for desktop file)
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:27:53 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > > I guess it might be helpful to know the difference between a desktop
> > > and a desktop.in file. Could someone please tell me about this
> > > difference?
A *.in file is an input/include file, i.e. a template file that is
taken by a tool to generate the complete output file by filling in the
missing details (such as unexpanded variables).
> The app looks cool and the current developer (who I contacted) is a high
> school student but does not know much about packaging for Fedora. He did
> suggest using Alien for creating the spec file from the debian package (but
> he did not know much about it, and I had not even heard about it) so I passed
> on that. I also thought that perhaps the debian package needs a Debian
> machine.
>
Do some trouble-shooting. As a first step, forget rpmbuild. Run the
same commands you run in %build and %install in your terminal. If
the commands fail, you need to fix the source code and cannot blame
rpmbuild or the spec file.
> Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X1IL6J
> [...]
> running install_egg_info
> Writing
> /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon-0.8.94-py2.7.egg-info
> ("ERROR: Can't find",
> '/home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/share/applications/typhoon.desktop')
> [...]
You may need to debug install_egg_info for this piece of software. This
error is not a spec file error, because your spec %files section does not
refer to this .desktop file anywhere [yet]. If the file were installed
into the buildroot, you would see a different error (rpmbuild complaining
about installed files not present in %files section).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: GNOME applications do not respect the chosen XFCE style
On 07/14/2015 07:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:10:05 +0200 Ralf Corsepius wrote: Could you be more verbose. What exactly are people supposed to install and which themes/settinga are known to work? Any theme that has both a gtk2 and gtk3 version should mostly work. adwaita-gtk2-theme.x86_64 albatross-gtk2-theme.noarch albatross-gtk3-theme.noarch bluebird-gtk2-theme.noarch bluebird-gtk3-theme.noarch clearlooks-phenix-gtk2-theme.noarch clearlooks-phenix-gtk3-theme.noarch egtk-gtk2-theme.noarch egtk-gtk3-theme.noarch greybird-gtk2-theme.noarch greybird-gtk3-theme.noarch light-gtk2-theme.noarch light-gtk3-theme.noarch zukini-gtk2-theme.noarch zukini-gtk3-theme.noarch zukitwo-gtk2-theme.noarch zukitwo-gtk3-theme.noarch zukiwi-gtk2-theme.noarch zukiwi-gtk3-theme.noarch Thanks for the list. I'll check if I can find a functional combo throughout the next couple of days. Or any locally installed one in ~/.themes that has both gtk2/gtk3. I don't have such folder - Is it supposed to be present and/or created? Of course some have bettter coverage than others... At least I have not been able to find any xfce/gtk2/gtk3 theme combo which harmonizes well with gnome3-apps under xfce on fc22 and deserves to be named "functional". IMO, it's all an annoying and dysfunctional mess. Well, adwaita is supposed to (it has a gtk2 version as well). adwaita doesn't seem to work. It seems to be being ignored by Firefox and Thunderbird and not harmonize well with some gnome3 apps (eg. rhythmbox). Of those I've tried so far, clearlooks-phenix seems to be closest to be functional with most apps, unfortunately it seems to have problems in computing the geometry/position of certains widgets correcty (I haven't tried to investigate deeper, yet). Ralf -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Evolution bug exporting calendar
On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 13:06 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I assume you mean in Fedora Bugzilla, in which case probably not. > > Ok, thanks. Yes, I meant Fedora bugzilla. > Note that the Evolution list is usually a better place to ask about > Evo > , see https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list > Okay. I will ask there. RM -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
