Re: [389-users] PassSync to 389DS SSL Error: Peer reports incompatible or unsupported protocol version.
On 28.7.2015 г. 9:23, ozikat wrote: Hi All, No luck, have inserted nsTLS1: on Can't work still. Still stay with PassSync 1.2.11.15 doraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users Hi, Have you tried adding LDAPSSL_ALLOW_OLD_SSL_VERSION=1 to the environment on the Windows machine? Regards, Deyan -- Deyan Stoykov, dstoy...@uni-ruse.bg ICT department University of Ruse -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: [389-users] PassSync to 389DS SSL Error: Peer reports incompatible or unsupported protocol version.
Hi Paul, Sorry for the delay in the answer. Our senior engineers have analyzed your problem. In fact pass sync 1.1.6 is using tlsv1.1. The first version of 389-ds-base in RHEL6 using this protocol is release 60, recently delivered, corresponding to RHEL6.7. An article has been written by the experts which will be published soon into our knowledge base describing this issue. Regards, German. On Jul 28, 2015, at 8:23, ozikat ozika...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, No luck, have inserted nsTLS1: on Can't work still. Still stay with PassSync 1.2.11.15 -- Paul Ooi On 7/27/15 23:25, German Parente wrote: Hi Ozikat, please, send your feedback as possible. thanks and regards, German. - Original Message - From: ozikat ozika...@gmail.com To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 4:43:16 PM Subject: Re: [389-users] PassSync to 389DS SSL Error: Peer reports incompatible or unsupported protocol version. Hi German, I am using 389-DS-BASE 1.2.11.15-48.el6_6. I got it working when installed PassSync 1.2.11.15 on the Windows 2008 R2 server. I will try to add nsTLS1 and see whether it works on 1.2.11.16 Thank you. -- Ozikat On 7/27/15 18:31, German Parente wrote: Hi, Which is the version of 389-ds-base you are running ? By the way, have you enabled TLS on server side ? In entry: dn: cn=encryption,cn=config the attribute nsTLS1 should be on : nsTLS1: on Thanks and regards, German. - Original Message - From: ozikat ozika...@gmail.com To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2015 6:20:13 PM Subject: [389-users] PassSync to 389DS SSL Error: Peer reports incompatible or unsupported protocol version. Good day everyday, I came across the problem to connect from 389PassSync Version 1.1.6-x86_64 running on Windows 2008 R2 _to_ 389-DS version 1.2.11.15 that running on Linux CentOS 6.6. Below is the error seen on /var/logs/dirdrv/slapd-xxx/access ### Access Log Start ### [26/Jul/2015:15:47:37 +] conn=4 fd=65 slot=65 SSL connection from x.x.x.x to y.y.y.y [26/Jul/2015:15:47:37 +] conn=4 op=-1 fd=65 closed - Peer reports incompatible or unsupported protocol version. [26/Jul/2015:15:47:45 +] conn=5 fd=65 slot=65 SSL connection from x.x.x.x to y.y.y.y [26/Jul/2015:15:47:45 +] conn=5 op=-1 fd=65 closed - Peer reports incompatible or unsupported protocol version. [26/Jul/2015:15:48:01 +] conn=6 fd=65 slot=65 SSL connection from x.x.x.x to y.y.y.y [26/Jul/2015:15:48:01 +] conn=6 op=-1 fd=65 closed - Peer reports incompatible or unsupported protocol version. [26/Jul/2015:15:49:15 +] conn=1 fd=64 slot=64 SSL connection from x.x.x.x to y.y.y.y [26/Jul/2015:15:49:15 +] conn=1 op=-1 fd=64 closed - Peer reports incompatible or unsupported protocol version. ### Access Log End ### I tried to connect using ldp.exe on Windows 2008 Server, it seems ok. Just that PassSync unable to communicate via the SSL connections from the server. ## ldp.exe start # ld = ldap_open(curry.noodle.com, 636); Established connection to curry.noodle.com. Retrieving base DSA information... Getting 1 entries: Dn: (RootDSE) dataversion: 020150726160257020150726160257; defaultnamingcontext: dc=noodle,dc=com; namingContexts (2): dc=noodle,dc=com; o=netscaperoot; netscapemdsuffix: cn=ldap://dc=curry,dc=noodle,dc=com:389; objectClass: top; supportedControl (21): 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.2; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.3; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.4; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.5; 1.2.840.113556.1.4.473 = ( SORT ); 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.9 = ( VLVREQUEST ); 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.16; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.15; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.17; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.19; 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.27.8.5.1; 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.27.9.5.2; 1.2.840.113556.1.4.319 = ( PAGED_RESULT ); 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.27.9.5.8; 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.666.5.16; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.14; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.20; 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.29539.12; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.12; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.18; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.13; supportedExtension (14): 2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.7; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.8; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.3; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.12; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.5; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.6; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.9; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.4; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.6.5; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.6.6; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.6.7; 2.16.840.1.113730.3.6.8; 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.20037 = ( START_TLS ); 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.11.1; supportedLDAPVersion (2): 2; 3; supportedSASLMechanisms (5): EXTERNAL; CRAM-MD5; DIGEST-MD5; ANONYMOUS; GSSAPI; vendorName: 389 Project; vendorVersion: 389-Directory/1.2.11.15 B2014.314.1342; --- res = ldap_simple_bind_s(ld, 'cn=spicy,cn=config', unavailable); // v.3 Authenticated as: 'cn=spicy,cn=config'. --- ## ldp.exe end # Hopefully there are jedi in the rom can help ;) -- Ozikat -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: keyboard
=== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 at 12:46 AM From: Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: keyboard On 07/31/15 05:47, Patrick Dupre wrote: In fedora 22, where can I say to start the first graphics screen (login) to load the right keyboard? It is set properly in Setting Region Language Input Screen Every time that I logout out, it return to the wrong keyboard. Is it something to set in grub? In Fedora 20, this was OK. I don't use GNOME either. But, I do use google... Instead of Setting Region Language Input Screen a simple google search seems to indicate what you want is... Settings Keyboard Input Sources Login Screen This exactly what I did, but it looks that I missed one point! Now it is OK. Sorry, I do not know why I missed the point -- If I wanted a blog or social media I'd go elsewhere -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: keyboard
On 07/30/2015 02:47 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, Greetings and salivations! In fedora 22, where can I say to start the first graphics screen (login) to load the right keyboard? It is set properly in Setting Region Language Input Screen Every time that I logout out, it return to the wrong keyboard. Is it something to set in grub? Most likely it's something to do with your display manager. If you're using Gnome, it's gdm. If you started with Gnome then switched to a different DE, it's probably still gdm unless you've specifically changed it. If you started out with a different DE, it's whatever display manager is default for that. Sorry to be so vague, but there's not enough in your post for me to be more exact. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Mounting exfat usb stick
$ grep sdc1 /etc/fstab UUID=BE5F-383B /sdc1 exfat noauto,rw,user,uid=508,gid=508 1 1 # cat /etc/fuse.conf # mount_max = 1000 user_allow_other $ mount /sdc1 FUSE exfat 1.0.1 fusermount: option blkdev is privileged So I tried as root, and it mounted OK: mount | grep sdc1 /dev/sdc1 on /sdc1 type fuseblk (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,user_id=508,group_id=508,allow_other,blksize=4096) then as root I tried to copy a file to /sdc1: # cp rpms.list /sdc1/ cp: cannot create regular file ‘/sdc1/rpms.list’: No such file or directory So, what else need I do so that regular users can mount and write to usb sticks that are formatted as exfat FS? These are the relevant rpms installed: fuse-exfat-1.0.1-1.fc20.x86_64 exfat-utils-1.0.1-1.fc20.x86_64 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: keyboard
On 07/31/15 05:47, Patrick Dupre wrote: In fedora 22, where can I say to start the first graphics screen (login) to load the right keyboard? It is set properly in Setting Region Language Input Screen Every time that I logout out, it return to the wrong keyboard. Is it something to set in grub? In Fedora 20, this was OK. I don't use GNOME either. But, I do use google... Instead of Setting Region Language Input Screen a simple google search seems to indicate what you want is... Settings Keyboard Input Sources Login Screen -- If I wanted a blog or social media I'd go elsewhere -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Kernel panic in 4.1.2-200.fc22.x86_64
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 16:13 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: On 07/30/2015 03:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 13:21 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:54:02 +0100 Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote: This is happening every few minutes since I updated today: Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0288 Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: IP: [8120f034] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x1c4/0x320 Going to try booting the previous kernel. This is likely a bug. Please file on BZ so that developers may know about it. It's wierd. I rebooted with 4.0.8 (which had previously been working with no issues) and got a different bug: Jul 30 18:54:49 Bree kernel: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3413! Jul 30 18:54:50 Bree kernel: invalid opcode: [#1] SMP I rebooted again with 4.0.6 and so far it seems to be working (several hours without crashing). I'll try updating again tomorrow before I report anything. That sort of inconsistency leads one to suspect a hardware issue. Perhaps a fan that's not running so things are too hot, a power supply that's dying, dirty memory connectors, etc. I don't think so. It's a desktop machine that's just over a year old and is not running hot. And I was getting no problems until I updated the system this morning. However I'll keep it in mind. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
keyboard
Hello, In fedora 22, where can I say to start the first graphics screen (login) to load the right keyboard? It is set properly in Setting Region Language Input Screen Every time that I logout out, it return to the wrong keyboard. Is it something to set in grub? In Fedora 20, this was OK. Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: keyboard
On 07/30/2015 03:03 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Yes, I run gnome. Do you need additional info? Sorry, but I don't use Gnome; I use Xfce and lightdm. However, as Gnome is the default DE for Fedora, I'm sure that somebody will. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Kernel panic in 4.1.2-200.fc22.x86_64
On 07/30/2015 03:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 13:21 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:54:02 +0100 Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote: This is happening every few minutes since I updated today: Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0288 Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: IP: [8120f034] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x1c4/0x320 Going to try booting the previous kernel. This is likely a bug. Please file on BZ so that developers may know about it. It's wierd. I rebooted with 4.0.8 (which had previously been working with no issues) and got a different bug: Jul 30 18:54:49 Bree kernel: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3413! Jul 30 18:54:50 Bree kernel: invalid opcode: [#1] SMP I rebooted again with 4.0.6 and so far it seems to be working (several hours without crashing). I'll try updating again tomorrow before I report anything. That sort of inconsistency leads one to suspect a hardware issue. Perhaps a fan that's not running so things are too hot, a power supply that's dying, dirty memory connectors, etc. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - The world is coming to an end ... SAVE YOUR FILES!!! - -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fragile Live Fedora ? Device-mapper Snapshot vs. Layered Fs solution (AUFS or Overlayfs)
On 07/30/2015 04:26 PM, derek wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: Could be this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220950 However I don't see the same snapshot message in that bug, that you get. No, it's different. This bug is as easy to reproduce: run Fedora 22 Live Mode on laptop or VM, it boots default into liveuser, try a `sudo dnf install 'Development Tools'` then kernel crash, from console I collected the dm-0 IO Errors. This is always reproducible that makes me think Fedora Live Mode is not usable at all, or maybe no users at all. On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: Also, overlayfs is really recently added to the kernel. It's much much newer than device mapper stuff. So I wouldn't call it immature. You might be thinking of the thin provisioning snapshots which is much newer, but still has been around longer than overlayfs. But I don't think the live media is using thin snapshots (?) I think they're the conventional (thick) type. The fact is with overlayfs (or aufs from 2014 Ubuntu release) Live Linux you can apt-get install whatever (write to /) as much data as possible; till it becomes full and returns -ENOSPACE (and continues usable if clean some data), on this Fedora Live OS with device-mapper and simple sudo dnf install a few packages crashes kernel. Which is more mature? Maybe this is not the right place to complain or file a bug, could you tell where is a better place to draw attention from developers behind Fedora Live? Probably the fedora-test list. Most of the developers/bug triagers live there. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - Fear is finding a .vbs script in your Inbox- -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fragile Live Fedora ? Device-mapper Snapshot vs. Layered Fs solution (AUFS or Overlayfs)
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 5:26 PM, derek denc...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: Could be this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220950 However I don't see the same snapshot message in that bug, that you get. No, it's different. This bug is as easy to reproduce: run Fedora 22 Live Mode on laptop or VM, it boots default into liveuser, try a `sudo dnf install 'Development Tools'` then kernel crash, from console I collected the dm-0 IO Errors. Yes it's reproducible. The problem is not inherently with device-mapper. It's a configuration issue where the snapshot is too small and it's a fixed size, doesn't grow. So it fills up, the file system face plants, then kernel oopses. The untested workaround for this for baremetal install is to re-create the installer media using livecd-iso-to-disk with the --overlay-size-mb option and set to something like 1000. Now there will be a live overlay of sufficient size for this installation. For VM, just install the OS and then install the tools post-install. This is always reproducible that makes me think Fedora Live Mode is not usable at all, or maybe no users at all. Your snark amuses me. I might try to recruit you for QA. On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: Also, overlayfs is really recently added to the kernel. It's much much newer than device mapper stuff. So I wouldn't call it immature. You might be thinking of the thin provisioning snapshots which is much newer, but still has been around longer than overlayfs. But I don't think the live media is using thin snapshots (?) I think they're the conventional (thick) type. The fact is with overlayfs (or aufs from 2014 Ubuntu release) Live Linux you can apt-get install whatever (write to /) as much data as possible; till it becomes full and returns -ENOSPACE (and continues usable if clean some data), on this Fedora Live OS with device-mapper and simple sudo dnf install a few packages crashes kernel. Which is more mature? Feel free to ask a kernel developer. Based on development time and testing, device-mapper has a lot more of both compared to overlayfs. On that basis alone I think device-mapper is more mature by a lot. The failure of your use case with Fedora is a configuration related issue rather than device-mapper vs overlayfs. Whether your use case should be better supported I don't know, so I asked on the devel@ list. And in the footnote are the technical details on why this fails. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-July/212956.html -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mounting exfat usb stick
On 07/31/15 09:16, jd1008 wrote: $ grep sdc1 /etc/fstab UUID=BE5F-383B /sdc1 exfat noauto,rw,user,uid=508,gid=508 1 1 # cat /etc/fuse.conf # mount_max = 1000 user_allow_other $ mount /sdc1 FUSE exfat 1.0.1 fusermount: option blkdev is privileged So I tried as root, and it mounted OK: mount | grep sdc1 /dev/sdc1 on /sdc1 type fuseblk (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,user_id=508,group_id=508,allow_other,blksize=4096) then as root I tried to copy a file to /sdc1: # cp rpms.list /sdc1/ cp: cannot create regular file ‘/sdc1/rpms.list’: No such file or directory So, what else need I do so that regular users can mount and write to usb sticks that are formatted as exfat FS? These are the relevant rpms installed: fuse-exfat-1.0.1-1.fc20.x86_64 exfat-utils-1.0.1-1.fc20.x86_64 Tried to recreate your issue. I didn't have a exfat formatted USB so I used mkfs.exfat to create. Then I labeled it I didn't do things exactly as you did but [root@f22k ~]# exfatlabel /dev/sdb1 myexfat [root@f22k ~]# exfatlabel /dev/sdb1 myexfat [root@f22k ~]# exfatfsck /dev/sdb1 xfatfsck 1.1.1 WARN: volume was not unmounted cleanly. Checking file system on /dev/sdb1. File system version 1.0 Sector size 512 bytes Cluster size 32 KB Volume size1928 MB Used space4 MB Available space1924 MB Totally 0 directories and 0 files. File system checking finished. No errors found. [root@f22k ~]# grep mnt /etc/fstab LABEL=myexfat /mntexfat noauto,rw,user,uid=1029,gid=65539 1 1 [root@f22k ~]# cat /etc/fuse.conf # mount_max = 1000 # user_allow_other [root@f22k etc]# mount /mnt FUSE exfat 1.1.0 [root@f22k etc]# mount | grep sdb1 /dev/sdb1 on /mnt type fuseblk (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,allow_other,blksize=4096,user) As me... [egreshko@f22k /]$ cd mnt [egreshko@f22k mnt]$ ls [egreshko@f22k mnt]$ touch x Then as root [root@f22k etc]# cd /mnt [root@f22k mnt]# ls x [root@f22k mnt]# touch y [root@f22k mnt]# ll total 0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 egreshko egreshko 0 Jul 31 11:44 x -rwxr-xr-x. 1 egreshko egreshko 0 Jul 31 11:44 y Then as another user... [root@f22k mnt]# su - maria [maria@f22k ~]$ cd /mnt [maria@f22k mnt]$ ls x y [maria@f22k mnt]$ touch z [maria@f22k mnt]$ ll total 0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 egreshko egreshko 0 Jul 31 11:44 x -rwxr-xr-x. 1 egreshko egreshko 0 Jul 31 11:44 y -rwxr-xr-x. 1 egreshko egreshko 0 Jul 31 11:45 z And again as root [root@f22k mnt]# ls x y z [root@f22k mnt]# cd [root@f22k ~]# pwd /root [root@f22k ~]# cp avail.txt /mnt [root@f22k ~]# ll /mnt total 3584 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 egreshko egreshko 3655878 Jul 31 11:46 avail.txt -rwxr-xr-x. 1 egreshko egreshko 0 Jul 31 11:44 x -rwxr-xr-x. 1 egreshko egreshko 0 Jul 31 11:44 y -rwxr-xr-x. 1 egreshko egreshko 0 Jul 31 11:45 z -- If I wanted a blog or social media I'd go elsewhere -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mounting exfat usb stick
On 07/30/15 20:16, jd1008 wrote: So I tried as root, and it mounted OK: mount | grep sdc1 /dev/sdc1 on /sdc1 type fuseblk (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,user_id=508,group_id=508,allow_other,blksize=4096) then as root I tried to copy a file to /sdc1: # cp rpms.list /sdc1/ cp: cannot create regular file ‘/sdc1/rpms.list’: No such file or directory So, what else need I do so that regular users can mount and write to usb sticks that are formatted as exfat FS? do not have an answer for your question, but i do have a question about what you show above. you show /sdc1/ in command, while your 'mountgrep' shows /dev/sdc1. are you working in /dev directory? with command # cp rpms.list /sdc1/, is rpms.list in current directory? comment: when showing command lines, is best to 'drag and paste' than just write a command line. sometimes it helps to show full command line prompt. just asking and trying to understand. :-) -- If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6 tc,hago. g . -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mounting exfat usb stick
On 07/30/2015 08:38 PM, g wrote: On 07/30/15 20:16, jd1008 wrote: So I tried as root, and it mounted OK: mount | grep sdc1 /dev/sdc1 on /sdc1 type fuseblk (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,user_id=508,group_id=508,allow_other,blksize=4096) then as root I tried to copy a file to /sdc1: # cp rpms.list /sdc1/ cp: cannot create regular file ‘/sdc1/rpms.list’: No such file or directory So, what else need I do so that regular users can mount and write to usb sticks that are formatted as exfat FS? do not have an answer for your question, but i do have a question about what you show above. you show /sdc1/ in command, while your 'mountgrep' shows /dev/sdc1. are you working in /dev directory? No!! I mount /dev/sdc1 on the directory /sdc1 with command # cp rpms.list /sdc1/, is rpms.list in current directory? Current directory (of the shell) happens to be other than /sdc1. comment: when showing command lines, is best to 'drag and paste' than just write a command line. sometimes it helps to show full command line prompt. just asking and trying to understand. :-) No problem. I think that there are quirks about the implementation of exfat as a user land driver (filesystem), instead of a kernel driver like ext[n]. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Kernel panic in 4.1.2-200.fc22.x86_64
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 13:21 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:54:02 +0100 Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote: This is happening every few minutes since I updated today: Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0288 Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: IP: [8120f034] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x1c4/0x320 Going to try booting the previous kernel. This is likely a bug. Please file on BZ so that developers may know about it. It's wierd. I rebooted with 4.0.8 (which had previously been working with no issues) and got a different bug: Jul 30 18:54:49 Bree kernel: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3413! Jul 30 18:54:50 Bree kernel: invalid opcode: [#1] SMP I rebooted again with 4.0.6 and so far it seems to be working (several hours without crashing). I'll try updating again tomorrow before I report anything. mm/slub.c and kmmalloc are memory related functions, so if you regress to a previously working kernel I'd say memory related. Maybe try live media and see if it happens. And start a memtest over the weekend and see if that triggers something. -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F21: infection reported by chkrootkit.
Hello Matthew, Yes I'm Real. To prove I'm real first off.. You are Community support for Fedora users and your mail Id users@lists.fedoraproject.org I was just taking a quick shower and I heard my phone vibrate, my hair isnt even close to being dry yet but I wanted to quickly check my email to see if it was you writing me back. I guess since you responded you are not a faker haha, that is a big relief. Not sure if you were wanting to get together tonight, tomorrow ..or maybe wait until the weekend? I am not going to lie though I was really hoping to get some as soon as possible.. All you have do is verify on this website HERE http://www.bcmeetnow.com/userms/olivia/ where I am a member and do a safety verification. It only costs a dollar and just takes a sec. My cell number is on there and I have some other photos on there too. Get my cell number and give me a text or call me. Let's make this happen.. I have lots of free time. call me now! Sorry if it seems like I'm being a bitch and making you work too hard, but I have to look out for my own safety. There are tons of weirdos out there and I just want to have a good time. Hope you understand cause I really want to meet you.. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F21: infection reported by chkrootkit.
On 07/30/2015 11:39 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: List admins are on this. No need to spread this further by replying more. Thanks. You should have paid more attention to the final *plonk!* That was the sound of her email address dropping to the bottom of my killfile. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
the list spammer
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:50:57AM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: You should have paid more attention to the final *plonk!* That was the sound of her email address dropping to the bottom of my killfile. But that doesn't do anyone any good. The spammer certainly isn't going to care (or even read it), and the _rest_ of the list just gets more off-topic mail. The point of my message was to let everyone know that list admins are aware and that you don't need to give additional reports (or, indeed, continue responding to the spammer). -- Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org Fedora Project Leader -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: the list spammer
On 07/30/2015 11:54 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: (or, indeed, continue responding to the spammer). I have no idea if that spammer is still active or not because any further messages from that address are deleted before I see them. That was part of the point of my original message; the other part was the implicit suggestion that others do the same. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fragile Live Fedora ? Device-mapper Snapshot vs. Layered Fs solution (AUFS or Overlayfs)
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:37:32PM +, Olivia wrote: [...] Thanks to the community folks who caught this and mailed the list owners. Kevin moderated the account. Hopefully as we migrate this and other lists to Mailman 3 we can make use of some more advanced protection against these goofballs. -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Problem with running mcpdf on F22
Dear All, I am trying to run mcpdf (installed from https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/thomasfedb/mcpdf/ ) on Fedora 22, but not being successful: $ mcpdf demo.pdf output example.pdf Error: A JNI error has occurred, please check your installation and try again Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/itextpdf/text/DocumentException at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method) at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701) at java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048) at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018) at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784) at sun.launcher.LauncherHelper.validateMainClass(LauncherHelper.java:544) at sun.launcher.LauncherHelper.checkAndLoadMain(LauncherHelper.java:526) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.itextpdf.text.DocumentException at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:331) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:357) ... 7 more $ Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Kernel panic in 4.1.2-200.fc22.x86_64
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote: This is happening every few minutes since I updated today: Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0288 Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: IP: [8120f034] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x1c4/0x320 Maybe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244076 -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Kernel panic in 4.1.2-200.fc22.x86_64
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:54:02 +0100 Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote: This is happening every few minutes since I updated today: Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0288 Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: IP: [8120f034] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x1c4/0x320 Going to try booting the previous kernel. This is likely a bug. Please file on BZ so that developers may know about it. Ranjan Can't remember your password? Do you need a strong and secure password? Use Password manager! It stores your passwords protects your account. Check it out at http://mysecurelogon.com/password-manager -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fragile Live Fedora ? Device-mapper Snapshot vs. Layered Fs solution (AUFS or Overlayfs)
Could be this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220950 However I don't see the same snapshot message in that bug, that you get. -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Kernel panic in 4.1.2-200.fc22.x86_64
Hello Ranjan, Yes I'm Real. To prove I'm real first off.. You are Ranjan Maitra and your mail Id users@lists.fedoraproject.org I was just taking a quick shower and I heard my phone vibrate, my hair isnt even close to being dry yet but I wanted to quickly check my email to see if it was you writing me back. I guess since you responded you are not a faker haha, that is a big relief. Not sure if you were wanting to get together tonight, tomorrow ..or maybe wait until the weekend? I am not going to lie though I was really hoping to get some as soon as possible.. All you have do is verify on this website HERE http://www.bcmeetnow.com/userms/olivia/ where I am a member and do a safety verification. It only costs a dollar and just takes a sec. My cell number is on there and I have some other photos on there too. Get my cell number and give me a text or call me. Let's make this happen.. I have lots of free time. call me now! Sorry if it seems like I'm being a bitch and making you work too hard, but I have to look out for my own safety. There are tons of weirdos out there and I just want to have a good time. Hope you understand cause I really want to meet you.. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F21: infection reported by chkrootkit.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: ... it. For a very long time, it considered the main systemd executable as infected, and nobody did anything about that. Everywhere you could Obviously, given what a mess systemd is. I wouldn't blame chkrootkit for it! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fragile Live Fedora ? Device-mapper Snapshot vs. Layered Fs solution (AUFS or Overlayfs)
Also, overlayfs is really recently added to the kernel. It's much much newer than device mapper stuff. So I wouldn't call it immature. You might be thinking of the thin provisioning snapshots which is much newer, but still has been around longer than overlayfs. But I don't think the live media is using thin snapshots (?) I think they're the conventional (thick) type. Chris Murphy On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: Could be this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220950 However I don't see the same snapshot message in that bug, that you get. -- Chris Murphy -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fragile Live Fedora ? Device-mapper Snapshot vs. Layered Fs solution (AUFS or Overlayfs)
Hello Chris, Yes I'm Real. To prove I'm real first off.. You are Community support for Fedora users and your mail Id users@lists.fedoraproject.org I was just taking a quick shower and I heard my phone vibrate, my hair isnt even close to being dry yet but I wanted to quickly check my email to see if it was you writing me back. I guess since you responded you are not a faker haha, that is a big relief. Not sure if you were wanting to get together tonight, tomorrow ..or maybe wait until the weekend? I am not going to lie though I was really hoping to get some as soon as possible.. All you have do is verify on this website HERE http://www.bcmeetnow.com/userms/olivia/ where I am a member and do a safety verification. It only costs a dollar and just takes a sec. My cell number is on there and I have some other photos on there too. Get my cell number and give me a text or call me. Let's make this happen.. I have lots of free time. call me now! Sorry if it seems like I'm being a bitch and making you work too hard, but I have to look out for my own safety. There are tons of weirdos out there and I just want to have a good time. Hope you understand cause I really want to meet you.. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F21: infection reported by chkrootkit.
Hello Butrus, Yes I'm Real. To prove I'm real first off.. You are Community support for Fedora users and your mail Id users@lists.fedoraproject.org I was just taking a quick shower and I heard my phone vibrate, my hair isnt even close to being dry yet but I wanted to quickly check my email to see if it was you writing me back. I guess since you responded you are not a faker haha, that is a big relief. Not sure if you were wanting to get together tonight, tomorrow ..or maybe wait until the weekend? I am not going to lie though I was really hoping to get some as soon as possible.. All you have do is verify on this website HERE http://www.bcmeetnow.com/userms/olivia/ where I am a member and do a safety verification. It only costs a dollar and just takes a sec. My cell number is on there and I have some other photos on there too. Get my cell number and give me a text or call me. Let's make this happen.. I have lots of free time. call me now! Sorry if it seems like I'm being a bitch and making you work too hard, but I have to look out for my own safety. There are tons of weirdos out there and I just want to have a good time. Hope you understand cause I really want to meet you.. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fragile Live Fedora ? Device-mapper Snapshot vs. Layered Fs solution (AUFS or Overlayfs)
On 07/30/2015 11:29 AM, Olivia wrote: It only costs a dollar and just takes a sec. Let me guess: you get most of that dollar. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fragile Live Fedora ? Device-mapper Snapshot vs. Layered Fs solution (AUFS or Overlayfs)
Hello Joe, Yes I'm Real. To prove I'm real first off.. You are Community support for Fedora users and your mail Id users@lists.fedoraproject.org I was just taking a quick shower and I heard my phone vibrate, my hair isnt even close to being dry yet but I wanted to quickly check my email to see if it was you writing me back. I guess since you responded you are not a faker haha, that is a big relief. Not sure if you were wanting to get together tonight, tomorrow ..or maybe wait until the weekend? I am not going to lie though I was really hoping to get some as soon as possible.. All you have do is verify on this website HERE http://www.bcmeetnow.com/userms/olivia/ where I am a member and do a safety verification. It only costs a dollar and just takes a sec. My cell number is on there and I have some other photos on there too. Get my cell number and give me a text or call me. Let's make this happen.. I have lots of free time. call me now! Sorry if it seems like I'm being a bitch and making you work too hard, but I have to look out for my own safety. There are tons of weirdos out there and I just want to have a good time. Hope you understand cause I really want to meet you.. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F21: infection reported by chkrootkit.
On 07/30/2015 11:33 AM, Olivia wrote: Hello Butrus, Yes I'm Real. No you're not. This is the third copy of the exact same message I've received from you today, except for the name at the top. *plonk!* -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F21: infection reported by chkrootkit.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:38:01AM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: On 07/30/2015 11:33 AM, Olivia wrote: Hello Butrus, Yes I'm Real. No you're not. This is the third copy of the exact same message I've received from you today, except for the name at the top. List admins are on this. No need to spread this further by replying more. Thanks. -- Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org Fedora Project Leader -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: keyboard
=== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 at 12:00 AM From: Joe Zeff j...@zeff.us To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: keyboard On 07/30/2015 02:47 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, Greetings and salivations! In fedora 22, where can I say to start the first graphics screen (login) to load the right keyboard? It is set properly in Setting Region Language Input Screen Every time that I logout out, it return to the wrong keyboard. Is it something to set in grub? Most likely it's something to do with your display manager. If you're using Gnome, it's gdm. If you started with Gnome then switched to a different DE, it's probably still gdm unless you've specifically changed it. If you started out with a different DE, it's whatever display manager is default for that. Sorry to be so vague, but there's not enough in your post for me to be more exact. Yes, I run gnome. Do you need additional info? Thank. users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Kernel panic in 4.1.2-200.fc22.x86_64
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 13:21 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:54:02 +0100 Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote: This is happening every few minutes since I updated today: Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0288 Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: IP: [8120f034] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x1c4/0x320 Going to try booting the previous kernel. This is likely a bug. Please file on BZ so that developers may know about it. It's wierd. I rebooted with 4.0.8 (which had previously been working with no issues) and got a different bug: Jul 30 18:54:49 Bree kernel: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3413! Jul 30 18:54:50 Bree kernel: invalid opcode: [#1] SMP I rebooted again with 4.0.6 and so far it seems to be working (several hours without crashing). I'll try updating again tomorrow before I report anything. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: keyboard
On 07/31/15 06:46, Ed Greshko wrote: On 07/31/15 05:47, Patrick Dupre wrote: In fedora 22, where can I say to start the first graphics screen (login) to load the right keyboard? It is set properly in Setting Region Language Input Screen Every time that I logout out, it return to the wrong keyboard. Is it something to set in grub? In Fedora 20, this was OK. I don't use GNOME either. But, I do use google... Instead of Setting Region Language Input Screen a simple google search seems to indicate what you want is... Settings Keyboard Input Sources Login Screen Ahhh cat hit send before I finished Others have said that doesn't work and they have have had to place something similar to Section InputClass Identifier evdev keyboard catchall MatchIsKeyboard on MatchDevicePath /dev/input/event* Driver evdev Option XkbLayout gb EndSection In the file /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-evdev.conf -- If I wanted a blog or social media I'd go elsewhere -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fragile Live Fedora ? Device-mapper Snapshot vs. Layered Fs solution (AUFS or Overlayfs)
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: Could be this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220950 However I don't see the same snapshot message in that bug, that you get. No, it's different. This bug is as easy to reproduce: run Fedora 22 Live Mode on laptop or VM, it boots default into liveuser, try a `sudo dnf install 'Development Tools'` then kernel crash, from console I collected the dm-0 IO Errors. This is always reproducible that makes me think Fedora Live Mode is not usable at all, or maybe no users at all. On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: Also, overlayfs is really recently added to the kernel. It's much much newer than device mapper stuff. So I wouldn't call it immature. You might be thinking of the thin provisioning snapshots which is much newer, but still has been around longer than overlayfs. But I don't think the live media is using thin snapshots (?) I think they're the conventional (thick) type. The fact is with overlayfs (or aufs from 2014 Ubuntu release) Live Linux you can apt-get install whatever (write to /) as much data as possible; till it becomes full and returns -ENOSPACE (and continues usable if clean some data), on this Fedora Live OS with device-mapper and simple sudo dnf install a few packages crashes kernel. Which is more mature? Maybe this is not the right place to complain or file a bug, could you tell where is a better place to draw attention from developers behind Fedora Live? Chris Murphy Thanks, -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Dell WMI
On 07/29/2015 09:18 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: Jul 27 15:39:47 localhost kernel: [18095.720272] dell_wmi: Received unknown WMI event (0x11) Jul 27 15:39:48 localhost kernel: [18097.73] dell_wmi: Received unknown WMI event (0x11) Jul 27 15:40:38 localhost kernel: dell_wmi: Received unknown WMI event (0x11) Jul 27 15:40:41 localhost kernel: dell_wmi: Received unknown WMI event (0x11) Thanx Ed. It is not causing any malfunction. I wanted to know what the unknown event is and why it is labeled unknown. Seems to me that on such old hardware, there should not be any unknown interrupts/events. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
fragile Live Fedora ? Device-mapper Snapshot vs. Layered Fs solution (AUFS or Overlayfs)
users@lists.fedoraproject.org I tend to run Live Linux on laptop for months without a shutdown (suspend / resume only). Ubuntu and Mint work in this mode well, until recently I want to give Fedora a chance, but it failed with IO Errors like this, when I did sudo yum install something (or dnf install something), this is always reproducible kernel panic whenever I run it on laptop physical hardware, or in kvm, with the current Fedora 22 Workstation image, I tested a few other spins as well, failed the same https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/download/ https://labs.fedoraproject.org/security/download/index.html I wonder is this a well known issue ? on Fedora Bugzilla database ? If under Live OS mode, the / doesn't support writing how can it be called Live ? I researched a little more and figured out because Fedora Live mode runs on top of dev-mapper snapshot driver while Ubuntu runs on Overlayfs that looks more stable; wonder are there some technical reasons why Fedora use dev-mapper snapshot such immature driver ? [ 373.306048] device-mapper: snapshots: Invalidating snapshot: Unable to allocate exception. [ 373.310022] Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 1609980 [ 373.311236] Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 1609981 [ 373.313031] Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 1609982 [ 373.316023] Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 1609983 [ 373.319126] Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 1609984 [ 373.322136] EXT4-fs error (device dm-0): ext4_find_entry:1289: inode #45749: comm kworker/u2:2: reading directory lblock 0 [ 373.324414] Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 1609985 [ 373.328306] Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 1609986 [ 373.329445] Buffer I/O error on dev dm-0, logical block 0, lost sync page write [ 373.331205] Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 1609987 [ 373.332667] Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 1609988 [ 373.337317] Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 1609989 [ 373.338726] EXT4-fs error (device dm-0) in ext4_ext_truncate:4669: IO failure [ 373.339935] EXT4-fs (dm-0): previous I/O error to superblock detected [ 373.341146] Buffer I/O error on dev dm-0, logical block 0, lost sync page write [ 373.342554] EXT4-fs error (device dm-0) in ext4_ext_truncate:4669: IO failure [ 373.343961] EXT4-fs (dm-0): previous I/O error to superblock detected [ 373.352119] Buffer I/O error on dev dm-0, logical block 0, lost sync page write [ 373.359310] audit: *NO* daemon at audit_pid=789 [ 373.360056] audit: auditd disappeared [ 373.858134] Aborting journal on device dm-0-8. [ 373.858877] Buffer I/O error on dev dm-0, logical block 12679, lost sync page write [ 373.860548] JBD2: Error -5 detected when updating journal superblock for dm-0-8. [ 373.862332] EXT4-fs (dm-0): previous I/O error to superblock detected [ 373.863432] Buffer I/O error on dev dm-0, logical block 0, lost sync page write [ 373.865080] EXT4-fs error (device dm-0): ext4_journal_check_start:56: Detected aborted journal [ 373.866572] EXT4-fs (dm-0): Remounting filesystem read-only [ 373.867539] EXT4-fs (dm-0): previous I/O error to superblock detected [ 373.869236] Buffer I/O error on dev dm-0, logical block 0, lost sync page write [ 373.939115] EXT4-fs error (device dm-0): ext4_find_entry:1289: inode #145895: comm gmain: reading directory lblock 0 [ 373.939854] EXT4-fs (dm-0): previous I/O error to superblock detected [ 373.940415] Buffer I/O error on dev dm-0, logical block 0, lost sync page write [ 374.132832] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x000b [ 374.132832] [ 374.133007] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64 #1 [ 374.133007] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.8.1-20150604_211837-tipua 04/01/2014 [ 374.133007] a3109a5c 880052487c68 81782644 [ 374.133007] 81a4c850 880052487ce8 817813b4 [ 374.133007] 0010 880052487cf8 880052487c98 a3109a5c [ 374.133007] Call Trace: [ 374.133007] [81782644] dump_stack+0x45/0x57 [ 374.133007] [817813b4] panic+0xd0/0x203 [ 374.133007] [8109f69d] do_exit+0xb3d/0xb40 [ 374.133007] [8109f737] do_group_exit+0x47/0xb0 [ 374.133007] [810ab5dc] get_signal+0x27c/0x610 [ 374.133007] [81013547] do_signal+0x37/0x760 [ 374.133007] [81013cef] do_notify_resume+0x7f/0xa0 [ 374.133007] [81789952] retint_signal+0x48/0x86 [ 374.133007] Kernel Offset: 0x0 from 0x8100 (relocation range: 0x8000-0x9fff) [ 374.133007] drm_kms_helper: panic occurred, switching back to text console [ 374.133007] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x000b [ 374.133007] [liveuser@localhost ~]$ df -Th Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use%
Kernel panic in 4.1.2-200.fc22.x86_64
This is happening every few minutes since I updated today: Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0288 Jul 30 18:26:21 Bree kernel: IP: [8120f034] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x1c4/0x320 Going to try booting the previous kernel. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
